I keep forgetting Planes isn't Pixar because its like a sequel to cars, but it was just disney. So when we were in the top 10, I started to get nervous...
Yeah Planes always confused me, like, it was Pixar or Disney? Or both? But well i guess Disney got the rights to make an unecessary spin-off that literally only conects with a random Mater Tall Tales episode..
TJMonsterr it was made by the Walt Disney Animations studio, the same people who made Moana, The older movies, and Frozen. Yeah. Also, of course they had the rights...who do you think owns Pixar? Edit: holy damn I was wrong these were made by the same bastards who made bad sequels and...anything but good movies
Auto does conspire to keep people on the ship but it isnt really explained why other than he just does it. I mean if auto's real deal was all about following instructions blindly, why would he disobey the instruction from the manual. Actually while writing this comment i kind of thought, auto is a part of the ship, people leave the plane, auto would have no purpose what's so ever. Could it be that this is auto's reason, keeping humans to stay in power. It does fit in with what I think really is the main antagonist of this movie: the axiom
@@toukisacecard6532 AUTO just doesn't want to be useless. Following his programming to keep the humans alive is his one and only purpose and the only thing that gives him any value so if humanity no longer relies on the ship to survive then AUTO becomes worthless.
Yh but maybe if he had told us instead his personality just being a computer. If he had said something like " humans can never change and willl continue to destroy the earth" cause that's what he's been programmed to think but really he's the only one who can't change would have made his character more interesting and villonous. That's just my opinion though
squarespace- from websites and onlines stores to marketing tools and analytics, squarespace is the all in one platform to build a beautiful online presence and run your buisness.
I'm not gonna lie-- as someone who has short term and long term memory loss, Finding Dory hit me HARD man. It's such an amazingly different experience being someone that the main character is trying to represent (not talking about movies from a racial standpoint, that is a completely different type of relatability in my opinion). I'd never felt so incredibly well represented in a movie before. Dory's memory loss issues, and how she remembers things through word and picture association (the shells being one of them, helping her trigger the memory of her family) is amazingly accurate. I straight up cried in theatre when I first saw it, and my grandmother had to help me get in to the car on the way back because it was hard to see from my puffed up eyes. Also wanted to note that Marlan getting mad at Dory and frustrated with her is 100% something that happens to people like me, all the time. And it made sense that Marlan would still get frustrated at her seeing as you can't simply make that feeling go away via character growth. That's just not how real people work. Even my grandparents get frustrated with me at times, though they always apologise afterwards when they realise what they had said. Because, to be honest, living and dealing with someone that has memory loss issues can be straining on all parties. The constant reminders, the frustration when you forget a very obvious or important piece of information. Having to remind that person to eat by making food for them or giving them a bottle of water (which, I often need help with. I often forget to eat, drink, or sleep at the proper times). The struggle is real. Compared to the first movie, where Dory's memory loss was often played off for laughs a little bit too much, she is so much stronger as a character. And arguably I'd say the writing concerning the subject is stronger and more respectful. And that fact makes me so happy-- heck, just thinking about it makes me get a little choked up. Long story short: It's a cloud nine feeling to think about watching the first movie as a kid, only to grow up, learn I have the struggles of one of my favourite movie characters of all time, only to see her get her own movie and representation by the time I was in college. Feels good man.
@@PapaBearIsHere 1) Monsters Inc 2) Incredibles 3) Wall-E 4) Inside Out 5) Finding Dory I'm not really a big Toy Story fan because I didn't watch those movies nearly enough as I have the top 4. Though I must say that they are quite good having re-watched them as an adult. I haven't seen Soul yet (even though I've been spoiled to the twist, which, I honestly don't mind). Also Coco may be a very good movie, extremely good even, but I do not have any personal connection with it. I'd probably rank Coco directly under Finding Dory at 6, followed by (I'm sorry) Monsters University. Monsters University helped me through a really rough patch in life when I was trying to decide if I should drop out of college for the first time or not. I tend to rank stuff based on personal enjoyment and less so because of the actual quality. If I were to rank it on quality, it'd be pretty similar to how it was in the video (except I'd switch Toy Story 3 with Wall-E).
I mean they're not an antagonist but I'd say the corporations who fucked up the planet in wall-e were pretty villianous. And the ones doing the same thing IRL.
No clear villain makes the movie a lot better IMO... Since in most cases (IRL) problems result more from bad behaviour of ordinary people instead of the acts of evil people.
It kinda has a lorax vibe to it, everyone is doing what they believe is good, auto was ordered to keep humans in space at all costs and it just tried to do its duty
See, I like Auto as a villain because he’s an antithesis to every other robot in Wall-E, which goes against its programming to be able to develop their own personalities and make their own decisions. Meanwhile, Auto is following his programming to a T, to the point where he refuses to go back to Earth despite the plant being proof that life can’t flourish on Earth, just because he hasn’t received orders to do so from the ones who had programmed him in the first place.
I totally agree, and about the motivations thing, I can totally see them. Just look at the state of earth and how most humans are perfectly content with living on the axiom, the audience can connect the dots of auto’s motives on their own
The point of Wall-E's villian is that he had no character. A representation of the lifeless shells humanity was becoming if you will. No back story, no character, no emotion and the humans survived but didn't live. A machine. One could say the humans are less compelling than the robot protagonists because they've lived in such a shallow, souless environment for so long. Auto takes the "care" out of "character" in that he cares about nothing but his programming. The prefect obstical for a message that begs any eyeballs on the screen to feel deeply for life on earth and life as a whole.
I completely agree but I want to add a few things. I think he also represents the Mindset of humans of our era. He believes the plant is irreverent because the humans programmed him to think that. He represents men while the robots and the fat humans represent nature.
Also the part where Syndrome shoots down the plane while holding Mr. Incredible hostage, as a kid I never thought too much about it but I can't imagine what Mr. Incredible went through when he thought his wife and children were killed.
A cool thing that at least in portuguese, Dash and Syndrome had a phrase that was identical, Dash fighting with his mother says a phrase about being special, in the lines of "Saying that everyone is special is basically saying that no one is." and Syndrome has the Super line that everyone knows. That is just cool
"But for the love of God, don't make any more Toy Story movies. There's nowhere left to go for real this time. Please stop here. Thank You." Ok, that didn't age well . . .
"Why is AUTO just a boring villain with no personality and just doing what he is told?" I think you're missing the point of AUTO's character and what the movie might be trying to get at with him. Perhaps not thinking for himself and just doing what he was programmed is what lead him to be a villain. The fact that he was so focused on following his directive is what lead him to literally put the whole ship in danger to keep it from returning to earth. I think part of the movie is telling us that blindly following instructions can lead to self destruction. WALL-E's only directive was to clean the earth, but he ended up developing a personality outside of his programming and ended up being the only survivor of his whole robotic race. I don't think that was a coincidence. The humans on the ship are so used to living their life hands off that when the captain hears about the prospect of going back to earth, he's afraid of the idea of actually having to take control of his own life instead of leaving it to the auto pilot. The humans are so blinded by technology that they didn't even know about the jogging track or the pool on the ship. There's definitely plenty of theme's that the movie incorporates that we can discuss, like how we blindly accept our culture of consumerism and materialism, however I have to disagree that the producers dropped the ball when writing AUTO's character.
I see what you're getting at, but they could've given him some personality. It kinda reminds of Jiren from Dragon Ball Super: they lean wayyy to heavily on a character being the an emotionless piece of bread, and could've made him more intimidating or sinister. A robot can have a personality but still follow it's programming to a T, like Hal from 2001. In Wall-E he's more an obstacle than a compelling antagonist.
In defense of Cars 3, when I took my ex-racer dad to the theatre to see it, he really identified with it and appreciated it going back to the roots of racing, that being the moonshiners. It's quality isn't great, but I really like it for the sole purpose that my dad was able to see alot of himself in it.
@@Kev24 To me the plot was just boring and the girl car was annoying. I also think it's weird that every time lightning McQueen gets character growth he goes back to being the same in the next movie
The whole point of the movie is being your own person. WHAT BETTER VILLAIN TO IT THAN A TOTALLY AUTOMATED MACHINE WHICH DOES ONLY WHAT IT WAS PROGRAMMED FOR AND TRIES TO MAKE EVERYONE BE AS OBEDIENT!? Really, it makes more sense than any other alternative.
@@galaxystudios370 but that's a thing, his personality is a cold seemingly pragmatic control freak who serves commands, even if they were based on foolishness of corporations. It's not new or last time we see that trope, but it shows value of compassion compared to cold planning which makes you stuck.
It's kinda hilarious that someone who worked on the prince of egypt, lion king, and beauty and the beast was fired. Now I know why brave crashed and burned.
For me, I actually really like the story of Up. Even past the first 15 minutes. It's a charming story about a grumpy old man learning how to move on from the past. He spends most of the movie caught up on fulfilling his dead wife's dream, but then learns that the life they spent together was the best adventure she could have ever asked for. As for your critique on Auto, I think what you said makes him boring actually makes him interesting as an AI villain. There's a video I saw that pointed this out really well how nothing Auto does is out of malice or evil intentions, but cold-hearted efficiency towards its prime directive: Keep humanity onboard the Axiom and make sure they stay safe.
When he mentioned that he didn’t cry during his Up rewatch, but cried during Coco I was like “No, there is no way Coco has a moment that will make me cry harder than that”. Then I went and watched Coco for the first time... 😭
Yeah, no, I’ve watched both and both make me cry. But UP is definitely better, and made me cry harder. UP is a masterpiece and makes you sob in the first five minutes, and possibly multiple times throughout the movie. That’s impressive
me, watching coco for the 4th time: i won't cry this time i swear mama coco and miguel: sings remember me together me, already grabbing 2 tissues: ...god damn it
@@thisisaterribleargument_but Are you really suggesting that this is true? In the movie, 2319 means a sock stuck on someone’s back. Are you saying that they all immediately connected lights turning off to a fucking sock, and then immediately shared that?
44:27 The robots being complex IS the reason why Auto is so basic, and that IS the contrast to Wall-E and Eve narratively. I don’t think they could have made a better villain than this one, if you ask me. So this section misses the mark for me, but at least we are in agreement that everything else is amazing lol
Literally, every criticism he made about AUTO in WALL-E is the point. WALL-E is full of personality. He is unique while still following his programming. AUTO is the antithesis to WALL-E. He has no personality and only follows programming
@@jasminelai8829 I think it would muddy the message tbh, the whole point was that the conflict was caused by mindless short sightedness incapable of seeing the bigger picture, or it simply didnt matter, Auto encapsulated that perfectly.
My theory is that his development of a personality and the ability to think for himself is the only thing that let WALL-E survive. He was able to adapt unlike all the other WALL-E units. AUTO can’t adapt or ignore his orders, so even if he could think for himself, he would still assume survival is impossible. I don’t know if I worded that well.
So we watched cars 2 in English class (second language to us, so we do basically nothing) and it was the greatest cinematic experience of all time. 10/10, spy cars are great and no one can tell me otherwise.
I have to completely agree, Cars 2 has the extra amount of bullshittery and crazyness that makes it an actually great movie. The living cars get a fucking spy movie with guns and lasers and torturing a spy car to death in the first act. Bcs fuck you, that's why.
@@epzoit was one of the first movies I watched as a kid, and I don’t want to have some weirdo n RUclips taking things way too serio ruining my pure image of the movie
I really like that Schaf will point out stuff that's bad about movies, but will also say 'if it makes you happy and you relate to it, then that's worth the movie existing alone'
And thats the only thing that matters at the end of the day. Movies are made for entertainment, so if you have a good time watching a film, no matter what quality that film might be objectively, then it deserves to exist.
I think the reason why Joy’s arc works better is because there’s real meaning behind it. The film’s a metaphor for emotions (no shit) and Joy’s arc is a metaphor for how toxic positivity leads to burnout and it’s ok to be sad, which is a legit thing that kids and their parents should realise
@@oklahomacityradiowaves5462 Toxic Positivity simply is the idea that one always has to be happy and things are always fine. Part of being happy is being sad, and bad things will inevitably happen. You shouldn't shame someone for being happy but you also shouldn't dismiss feelings of sadness and such.
As a kid, I always loved that they didn’t make Jessie a love interest for Woody. Obviously he had Bo Peep but it would have been so easy to do cowgirl likes cowboy. And I actually like the connection of Buzz and her liking each other. Cute and from different worlds.
Aren't they supposed to basically be related since they're from the same line of toys? Kinda would be implying some slight incest if you make them love interests
@@xdeathcon first of all: your mind is sick, stop watching porn. Secondly, wtf, this line of thought doesn’t make any sense. A husband and his wife are still “family” but there’s nothing creepy about it, Woody and Jesse can be from the same line and not be siblings. Also, did you forget that Mr and Mrs Potato Head are also from the same toy line? Is there any in***t in their relationship?
@@pedrorenault5335 idk man it's just a stupid head canon theory thing I came up with at like 2 am. Also Mr. and Mrs. Potato Head are made specifically to be married together judging by their titles.
The whole buzz’s inner voice thing sounded like it was gonna resolve at the end, when he kept turning on the thing and it kept saying leave, I thought his conscious was gonna tell him otherwise and for him to defy his voice buttons. But instead he sarcastically says “thanks inner voice” and listens to it anyway
He did a whole video on Ratatouille and talks about the writer in it. It's Brad Bird, he also produced the incredibles, Iron Giant, helped with Jassisic World, a lot of the pixar shorts, and even more. Pretty talented guy I must say, but @Vinicius is right, he prolly doing a lot of drugs lmao
Even though he is credited as the director, Brad Bird didn't actually come up with the concept of the movie. Ratatouille is the brain child of Jan Pinkava in 2000. The movie was stuck in development hell for years until executives lost confidence in him as a director and they handed the project over to Brad Bird, where he had to turn the production around in 18 months. Looking at deleted scenes and marketing, it looks a lot like Ratatouille was originally going to be a heist movie, and then when Brad Bird took over, he turned it into an art house film.
Stay strong Schaff, I watched you in a time where it was very difficult to me. I will never know what this pain is, but I want you to know that I, and others, appreciate you.
“You know what finding Nemo has?” Lol what “A net, you know what also has a net?” This is gonna be an ad isn’t it “The interne-“ *rapidly taps the right side of the screen*
I don’t know why specifically, but Coco will always be one of my personal favorite Pixar movies of all time, simply because of the twist villain, the music, and the absolutely phenomenal emotional climax and ending, this is the only movie that has ever made me cry, and I still choke up at the ending to this day
For me, it's Monsters University. If you ask me, it's the most fun and entertaining movie in Pixar, it's also taught us a good life lesson, I would say, movies like Ratatouille, Coco, Soul I find them descent.
Schaff: "Why does the villian in WALL-E blindly follows his programming but the other good personified robots don't???" [44:19] Pixar: _"Because that's... the point?"_
@@tanner201x8 because he’s the antagonist. One of the messages of the film is don’t blindly follow orders, have your own personality. So of course the bad guy isn’t gonna do that
@@hhhhhh-vk9wk I mean, technically so does Pixar. Art is iterative. The Incredibles 2 absolutely could have looked towards any other work of art and used it as inspiration when constructing its own villain. It could have been the same in everything but name really.
Fun Fact: Test audiences who sympathized with Lotso for his backstory wanted him to push the button in the incinerator scene to redeem himself. However, according to the DVD commentary, director Lee Unkrich explained that the filmmakers decided to drop Lotso's chance for redemption in order to make the audience who had gotten to know Andy's toys over the past 15 years in three movies care about the characters even more as they went to the fire, when it looked like the end for them before the Squeeze Toy Aliens rescued them with the claw.
Honestly, I think he’s just too hard on all of Cars as a franchise. Cars is a fantastic movie, and I’d definitely put it higher on the list. Sure, the concept is weird, but it’s not enough to ruin the movie, or even make it less than great. The entire movie is great, but the third act race was genuinely incredible. Cars 2 definitely places lower, but it’s still a good movie in itself, as long as you accept that it really should have been marketed as a feature-length Mater’s Tall Tales and not a sequel to Cars.
What I find hysterical about cars 3 is that they don’t acknowledge anything about cars 2. It’s like Pixar said “ yeah, we fucked up; so here’s a movie with no more spy stuff and less Mater”
@@xiiwolfy You are not alone I loved it for the car culture in seeing cars from across the ages and the engine noises are heaven. Mater is ok but I agree he isn't strong
I feel that the majority of unrest regarding Cars 2 derives from its disruption of the McQueen story. If it were just a spin-off movie, I think it would’ve received far less attack
Can I we just appreciate the effort and small details on the video thumbnail? -Mike’s face being covered up just like the commercial he starred in the movie. -Edna and Disgust essentially making the same pose, while being next to each other; a very interesting parallel. -Nemo, is hidden in the thumbnail, unlike Dory and Marlin who take front stage, you gotta FIND NEMO. :) -The fact that the Ellie and Carl’s house from UP is seen in the distance, emphasizing that it’s high UP in the sky! -And Anton Ego looking real confused by Forky. I mean he’s seen Rats cook, but never a talking fork! -and there are probably way more references that I missed, but like: I just love this thumbnail so so much.
Has anyone else realized that cars and Thor have the exact same plot 1. Character has been separated from his world 2. is forced to sit in a small town and rediscover themselves 3. Finds a way to get back to said world and fights for the honor of the small town.
I grew up loving Cars and Wall E as a kid, however when I saw Thor in theaters originally, I had to leave due to it being to scary for kid me, I still haven’t seen it, same happened with Green Lantern in the same year, however my middle school okayed some of that movie and it was whatever I guess
What haunts me is if Pixar ever made a sequel to Ratatouille not only it would be probably be worse but more importantly they would name it rataTWOille
@Victor Greenwood hmmm. Didn’t know that. But I will still stand by my point about Disney not giving two flying fucks about creativity lmao. Wish they brought back 2D animation. Btw I’m not mad at you. Just that it really irks me when so little effort is given to things that could go towards better projects.
Finding Dory isn't my favorite Pixar film. It's not even in my top 3. But my God, if it doesn't have one of my favorite scenes in any animated movie ever. As someone with ADHD, this scene right here 29:33 makes me absolutely sob every time I watch it. Yes, Dory's forgetfulness can be funny and is often played for jokes, but it's also handled with so much genuine care and heart in this movie. Like, this scene REALLY captures what it is like to have a disability like hers. When Dory finds her parents again, she breaks down into tears and immediately apologizes, saying she's so sorry for being forgetful, and she wishes she wasn't but she just can't help it. And how do her parents respond? By telling her it's ok, because she found them again. And not only that, she did it on her own, and gained more confidence in herself in the process too. Like...wow. Not only is that incredibly touching, it's also extremely relatable for people like me who ACTUALLY have disabilities that affect our memory. I've had basically that exact conversation with my parents in real life. Feeling guilty and apologizing for times my ADHD has caused me to mess up and forget important things, but then being reassure by my parents that it's ok, and they are still proud of me and my accomplishments even if sometimes I also have failures. It's a scene that makes me grateful for my family, which is exactly what I believe the goal of the scene was. I really cannot sing its praises enough. I feel like whoever wrote it just...understands. Around the time this film was made, a lot of people were joking about how Disney and Pixar were just trying as hard as possible to make audiences cry during their movies so that they could get nominated for Oscars. But this scene doesn't feel that way. It's one of the most genuine, most relatable, most heartwarming scenes I have ever watched from Pixar. And it keeps me coming back to Finding Dory over and over even in spite of it not being one of my favorite movies. It's just that good of a scene.
"Finding Nemo is saying the least." It pits a character too obsessed with the past to let his son live his life (which ultimately pushes his son away to near death) up against a character who is practically unable to remember the past (and thus acts impulsively). In the end, Marlin realizes that he has to find balance between the two and ultimately trust his son. It's also about disability - obviously Dory's disability, but also Nemo's. Nemo has never known life without two functional fins, but that's all Marlin sees when he sees Nemo. He sees a fish that's weak and incapable and, by the end, has to understand that Nemo is capable in his own way (aka: Finding Nemo). I actually find Finding Nemo's themes to be deeper than people give it credit for. That scene inside the whale is one of the best that Pixar has ever done. "How do you know something bad isn't going to happen?" "I don't." Good shit. Plus, the music is fuckin fire.
It's funny, out of all the movies Pixar has done it's probably one of the few that also quite literally repeats one of its core messages as well with the conclusion having the phrase be a mantra that gets repeated in order to save everyone: "Just keep swimming"
Exactly, my favorite Pixar movie because of how strong those characters are. The entirety of the scenes inside the whale are some of the most influential animated scenes I've ever watched.
I mean otto is genius because he is the only realistic robot villain, he does not feel, he does not think, he is programmed and it makes sense for him to be the villain since wall-e and eve seem to feel, every single robot seems to feel except the villain one
I never got above the absolute heartsplitter that is buzz realizing he isn't a special space ranger destined to save the galaxy. The cold dismissal of the truth, under the truck. The shock as he sees the comercial for the buzz toy on the TV. The moment of absolute grief before he resolves to overcome his mundanity, climbing up the stair's railing and taking his best shot at proving to himself he can be special. And then he fails it. Having wagered life, limb, and Ego, he is faced with the truly horrifying reality that he is not special. He is something as mundane as a toy. He ends up getting way too deep in his cups, and ends up with a genuine depressed apathy, at the realization that he can't save the world. His road out of this funk, is not only the lesson from woody that "even if you can't save the world, you can still make somebody else happy, and that is important", but it also comes in the opportunity to help woody out of the box, instantly proving the point. From there, buzz' finds that even if he isn't a special space ranger who can save the galaxy, he is talented, and actually does have wings he can use to reach Andy. He actually is special, but in a much more mundane way, and that is wonderful. Buzz' arc in toy story 1, is not entirely dissimilar to the one faced by Woody in TS2, but the fact that his delusion is something he has believed the entire time, and he has to not only overcome his own fear of mortality, but his entire life's illusion, means that it hits way deeper for me. Woody overcoming death seems a less challenging thing than buzz overcoming his life. People will obviously be different, and for people who didn't enter their teens with a belief that they were special and talented won't resonate with buzz that strongly. But to me, who had to come to terms with the harsh reality that talent isn't special, Buzz' story in Toy Story 1 has a very special place in my heart.
I agree, I just rewatched the movie and the buzz scene was just so well made, even the score was beautiful and tender when he tried to fly out of the window. Also the overall movie’s soundtrack is just fantastic in my opinion.
Oh please, the hardest scene in cinematic history is when Megamind’s robots dress him in the Black Mamba and the camera slowly pans out and you see him dripping in glory as he narrowly gazes at the camera with his arms out and the EPIC music plays in the background... yeah
The Intro is the Piston Cup Race where we see Lightning McQueen Chick Hicks and The King racing along a buttload of cars from cameos such as Dale Earnhardt Jr. And an Apple Car who has the number of 84 referencing the Macintosh the scene Dj boost wingo and snot rod let’s Mack go to sleep is after the Mack and McQueen conversation after the life is a highway scene😥
The monsters ink comment where you said “why didn’t the dean put the can in a glass case” I felt that. It always makes me mad. why would she have it in a classroom with college students? Obviously someone is gonna be clumsy
Anyone else almost piss themselves when the dean came on screen? Like JEEZ I get that she's supposed to have an ominous presence but she REALLY freaked me out when I first saw her on the big screen.
Pixar has two main strengths The humor in the more child friendly ones The story in the more adult directed ones And then there’s cars 2 without either
I have a slight issue with the first "problem" with Coco being "it isn't funny". I appreciated Coco for being less funny and taking itself more seriously considering the ideas that its trying to convey.
Auto is the product of his environment. He has been told for almost 700 years that earth is unsustainable and all is lost. He is the culmination of the themes in this movie. This film is about rejecting luxury and orders, and learning to have free will. Auto is everything this film is warning us about, and delivers with an amazing example. He is a robot that blindly follows orders and acts on them which only cripples humanity even further. His main philosophy is: "Good soldiers follow orders". The fact that he is literally the autopilot of the ship makes this just too perfect.
As defence for AUTO, he does actually have a motivation for not going back to Earth besides his programming. If everyone went back to earth, he would have no power over anyone like he does on the Axium. This is also shown in the scene where you can see him slowly get closer in the photos showing each captain from the past, showing he is taking control of the Axium rather than just following his only programming of not returning to Earth. He gains his own goal that is to have sheer power over everything.
I agree, but I also feel like Schaff is right too in that his character feels weak compared to the other robots. That one line where he says "irrelevant" is a bit too short for the weight of the conversation. i honestly love when he talks, i wish he had said something sinister (and longer) like "earth is no longer salvageable. there is no positive chance for reclamation." to show his programming mixed in with his character as a overcontrolling computer AI.
I have a way simpler explanation for AUTO in that, he's old. Old fashioned. Like, not only is he basic in programming and motives, he uses a Text-To-Speech for a voice, has been there since the beginning of the Axiom, and has stayed true to his objectives throughout. If he were to change his mind earlier, the Axiom wouldn't have stuck the course, as I'm sure some of the earlier captains, at some point, would've wondered about returning before they completely forgot about it.
@@javiiibot5887 I think it was the point that Auto had no personality, he's the obedient, stoic computer villain to contrast the emotional, deep robot heroes.
@@GeneralJaydonius I really enjoy your explanation. It diverges from the overdone characterization of "machines want to take over / don't have feelings" (like Terminator and I, Robot), and is also a lot more relevant as a modern fable. Auto's background that you highlighted is also something very interesting to consider.
While I thought Brave was okay and not as terrible as other people say, the way they treated the director WAS HORRIBLE!!!! In fact, it could have been a break-the-glass-ceiling movie and was actually a masterpiece.
@@deadaccount8054 in the final feature, you at least get to see Woody’s perspective and how he’ll start to hate Buzz. That, and he didn’t mean to throw Buzz out of the window, but just knock him behind the furniture instead. It’s just that things went out of his control from that point.
@@linkxmidna57 I mean it sure is lol ...like Fun fact : In the Philippines, they have this like toy man made of wood where hes wearing a barrel and when you take it off you can see his "woody" ahahaha
Inside Out is probably my favorite Pixar movie, standing right next to Soul and the Incredibles. I like The Incredibles because it's just incredibly (pun intended) entertaining. But Soul and Insides out are the only movies that really make me look at myself and think "what am I doing with my life?". They're just so relatable
I came to read the comments during the top 10 commercial break and “oh no he hasn’t ranked ralph breaks the internet yet and we’re on NEMO” suddenly dawned on me, and i started freaking out. Thanks for clarifying that i don’t have to worry about that being ranked here
I loved your input to Soul - this movie means a lot to me because it just came out when I was at a very low and lonely place in my life. This movie benefited my mental health so much, I still tear up whenever I see the scene at the piano with the montage of all of 22s adventures in a real human body. This movie made me feel alive again and I’m so so thankful for this to exist ❤
Mike Wasowski: “so we’re just gonna waltz right up to the factory right?” 1 second later Mike: “I cannot believe we are waltzing right up to the factory.” Comedy Gold
It’s hilarious because what! I mean don’t get me wrong I used to love every toy story movie but buzz having a existential crisis in toy story 1 is not only powerful, but less hilarious and more serious. However toy story 2 did at least made a follow up buzz’s storyline, and while toy story 3 is the best toy story movie it’s just that buzz being Spanish while funny he only speaks Spanish after he was switched to demo mode and none of andys toys ever considered switching back to play mode😥 man that was long😥
AUTO may not be a deep or complex villain but he is thematically appropriate for Wall-E. The movies main message with it's environmental stance is "things get better when we take action". AUTO is the embodiment of "do what is easiest: what you're told to do." He represents humanities tendency to take the easy route whenever possible, while Wall-E is humanity's curiosity, passion and independence. As a kid he genuinely terrified me because he was the only Pixar villain to actually harm the protagonist in a deep and real way (syndrome gets close, but he only ever scratches Mr. Incredible) AUTO short circuiting Wall-E in such a personal and visceral way with zero hesitation is an amazing analogy for how corporate policy exists to stamp out that drive and independence in it's participants and it stuck with me from my first viewing to this day.
Agreed. Wall•E is my favorite movie ever, and while I get his perspective with how he wants a certain kind of villain that AUTO isn’t, I think he’s missing why AUTO acts like he does. To be honest, it’s more of a subversion of that expected AI-becoming-a-human thing like HAL from 2001, which he is a visual reference to: he is completely emotionally absent. Which is pretty much what a human can become when overtaken my immense greed. And even other robots found a way to be unique and go against their programing. But AUTO follows directions unflinchingly. He is willing to kill Wall•E to achieve the mission of greedy humans who created him, to stay on the Axiom in a sleepwalking state of mediocrity forever. And that makes AUTO terrifying. He may not be the type of villain Schaffrillas personally likes the most, but he’s the perfect villian for the film.
this is honestly such a great perspective! i agreed with schaff’s views on AUTO, and even though i still have my gripes about him i love this perspective, too.
Ye I live in Edinburgh (not Scottish tho) and people in my school rlly like it mostly coz of Scottish culture and stuff so I usually talk to people about Pixar who think Brave is one of the best Pixar films, and when Schaffrilas put it near the bottom I realised how much it would trigger my friends
@@GoodSaulman_is_McJimmyGill same I grew up with Ratatouille,Walle,Shrek and others but had never seen monsters inc before. Now its my top 5 once I watched it
I don’t like the movie because it doesn’t have a lively and expressive atmosphere like monsters university, I also don’t really find the jokes laugh out loud funny.
I actually thought making Auto this soulless slave to his programming was a good decision. As you point out, every other robot in the story has a personality. But that's kinda the point. Wall-E and Eve and all the other robots are the good guys BECAUSE the stray from their programming in one way or the other. Hell, Eve is portrayed as the terminator for most of Act 1 because she's just following her programing, everything else be damned. It's only after she finds the plant and is separated from the goal of her programing on the spaceship that she becomes an actual character.
Agreed: 1. IDK why the EVEs are just apple-made terminators but it’s true - you make a sound near one and it’ll blow you to bits, and why supersonic flight? 2. What you said about them straying from their programming is pretty on-point. If Auto could stray from his programming, I think his motivation would be this: he’s spent 700 years fulfilling his directives, but what happens when they return to Earth? Auto would have no purpose, and he isn’t like the other robots in a sense that they can *leave* the ship - Auto is a wheel literally tethered to the ceiling. He would be stuck their with no purpose or company. I like to think that this was his real motivation, and not just, y’know... being a bot.
Once, I watched Ratatouille as a kid when I wasnt supposed to. The copy of the movie belonged to my stepdad. I snuck it to my room and watched it on my DVD player. He found out, took it out of my DVD player, turned to me and CRUSHED IT IN HIS HANDS IN FRONT OF MY EYES LIKE??????? WHAT KIND OF REACTION IS THAT??????? I guess it traumatized me enough to not watch it really for a while but man did not have to do all that.
The 'awful by Illumination standards' insult stings more when you remember that by the time Cars 2 came out Illumination only had two films (one of which was live action) and hadn't begun oversaturating the Minions yet.
Yeah, the actual villain of Inside Out is how stupid the fact that 2 color memories apparently always existed and yet were never once noticed because the plot needed such a fake reveal to work at all.
@@Vanreis True, she's 100% an antagonist in the movie. Come to think of it, I like to compare her to Marlin; both are overprotective parental figures who have to learn to let their "children" confront the nastiness and sadness of the world, otherwise they'll never grow. The difference is that we KNOW why Marlin is overprotective; his wife and other unborn children were killed. It's a lot easier for an audience to see him as a protagonist because we know why he's overprotective. Joy doesn't really have that trauma. What people forget though is that Joy is an emotion. She's basically us. Everyone knows what it's like to try and see the 'bright side' of bad situations, to try and suppress our sadness, to deny ourselves of the bad things are happening in our lives. All the time, we tend to avoid unpleasant situations and conversations because it makes us feel bad. It's a human, natural reaction and Joy is basically the embodiment of that reaction. I think if people thought of her in that mindset, they would see her as more of an antagonist or a flawed protagonist than a straight-up villain
@Thomas Bequette Not really, it just didn't stick like the average Pixar movie. That's not to say I didn't enjoy it. I actively enjoyed the movie I just didn't dwell on it for days on end afterward. Still, I've seen it like 6 times now.
It's a 'meh' movie for me, it's fine, but not a movie that I'll go back to multiple times. The plot is just not my cup of tea. I don't mind the Chris Pratt voice though,,
That quote about not being good enough for something but it still being okay really hits for me! I wanted to make video games ever since i picked up a controller, but as i grew up i realized making one was alot harder than i had thought. But through the process i learned one thing i was great at! Story telling!
IM ON A THUMBNAIL!
2 like and get pin ..... lol
This is a throwaway, ain’t it?
Hey look, Betty!
I read that in fingers crushed yelling voice.
Omg I didn’t notice, that’s amazing thank you for pointing that out
I keep forgetting Planes isn't Pixar because its like a sequel to cars, but it was just disney.
So when we were in the top 10, I started to get nervous...
Lmao
Hahahaha!
Yeah Planes always confused me, like, it was Pixar or Disney?
Or both? But well i guess Disney got the rights to make an unecessary spin-off that literally only conects with a random Mater Tall Tales episode..
@@NotCosmicBeam Disney
TJMonsterr it was made by the Walt Disney Animations studio, the same people who made Moana, The older movies, and Frozen. Yeah. Also, of course they had the rights...who do you think owns Pixar?
Edit: holy damn I was wrong these were made by the same bastards who made bad sequels and...anything but good movies
Auto is a good villain because he's literally the anti-thesis of all other robots: he *can't* think for himself, only able to follow his programming.
I never realized that.
Auto does conspire to keep people on the ship but it isnt really explained why other than he just does it. I mean if auto's real deal was all about following instructions blindly, why would he disobey the instruction from the manual.
Actually while writing this comment i kind of thought, auto is a part of the ship, people leave the plane, auto would have no purpose what's so ever. Could it be that this is auto's reason, keeping humans to stay in power. It does fit in with what I think really is the main antagonist of this movie: the axiom
@@toukisacecard6532 AUTO just doesn't want to be useless. Following his programming to keep the humans alive is his one and only purpose and the only thing that gives him any value so if humanity no longer relies on the ship to survive then AUTO becomes worthless.
Wait his name is Auto? I always thought it was Otto?
Yh but maybe if he had told us instead his personality just being a computer. If he had said something like " humans can never change and willl continue to destroy the earth" cause that's what he's been programmed to think but really he's the only one who can't change would have made his character more interesting and villonous. That's just my opinion though
“It’s awful by Illumination standards” is one of the best and most biting insults I’ve ever heard
@Заработок от 3000 в день same
I like cars 2
@Заработок от 3000 в день i cant speak indian
Am sowwy
@@volfgang1393 You are evil
@@deadaccount1.57 it shouldn't be a cars movie, and that's why I like it
Schaff: “Please don’t make any more. There’s no where left to go-”
Pixar: *Toy Story 5-*
🎶How 'bout we do, anyway?🎶
"How bad?! How BAD can this POSSIBLY BE?!!"
DreamWorks doing the same with Kung Fu Panda..
Oh no
Well shit, how did I not hear about this?
The universe didn’t start with a Big Bang, it started with: “funding for Schaffrillas is provided by”
I'm pretty sure its "provided by" not "probably by"
@@The_cool_duck sorry, stupid autocorrect and everything.
s k i l l s h a r e
and then Schaff said.. "let there be sponsorship!"
squarespace- from websites and onlines stores to marketing tools and analytics, squarespace is the all in one platform to build a beautiful online presence and run your buisness.
I'm not gonna lie-- as someone who has short term and long term memory loss, Finding Dory hit me HARD man. It's such an amazingly different experience being someone that the main character is trying to represent (not talking about movies from a racial standpoint, that is a completely different type of relatability in my opinion). I'd never felt so incredibly well represented in a movie before.
Dory's memory loss issues, and how she remembers things through word and picture association (the shells being one of them, helping her trigger the memory of her family) is amazingly accurate. I straight up cried in theatre when I first saw it, and my grandmother had to help me get in to the car on the way back because it was hard to see from my puffed up eyes.
Also wanted to note that Marlan getting mad at Dory and frustrated with her is 100% something that happens to people like me, all the time. And it made sense that Marlan would still get frustrated at her seeing as you can't simply make that feeling go away via character growth. That's just not how real people work. Even my grandparents get frustrated with me at times, though they always apologise afterwards when they realise what they had said. Because, to be honest, living and dealing with someone that has memory loss issues can be straining on all parties. The constant reminders, the frustration when you forget a very obvious or important piece of information. Having to remind that person to eat by making food for them or giving them a bottle of water (which, I often need help with. I often forget to eat, drink, or sleep at the proper times). The struggle is real.
Compared to the first movie, where Dory's memory loss was often played off for laughs a little bit too much, she is so much stronger as a character. And arguably I'd say the writing concerning the subject is stronger and more respectful. And that fact makes me so happy-- heck, just thinking about it makes me get a little choked up.
Long story short: It's a cloud nine feeling to think about watching the first movie as a kid, only to grow up, learn I have the struggles of one of my favourite movie characters of all time, only to see her get her own movie and representation by the time I was in college. Feels good man.
🥺🥺🥺
thats nice to hear my dude, where would you rank it in your personal list then.
This deserves WAY more likes
@@PapaBearIsHere 1) Monsters Inc
2) Incredibles
3) Wall-E
4) Inside Out
5) Finding Dory
I'm not really a big Toy Story fan because I didn't watch those movies nearly enough as I have the top 4. Though I must say that they are quite good having re-watched them as an adult. I haven't seen Soul yet (even though I've been spoiled to the twist, which, I honestly don't mind). Also Coco may be a very good movie, extremely good even, but I do not have any personal connection with it. I'd probably rank Coco directly under Finding Dory at 6, followed by (I'm sorry) Monsters University. Monsters University helped me through a really rough patch in life when I was trying to decide if I should drop out of college for the first time or not.
I tend to rank stuff based on personal enjoyment and less so because of the actual quality. If I were to rank it on quality, it'd be pretty similar to how it was in the video (except I'd switch Toy Story 3 with Wall-E).
A+ Could be a Pixar movie, who knows
"The Incredibles is the best superhero movie of all time."
It's ok Megamind you're still the best superhero movie in my mind
In your...
MEGA MIND
I have no regrets
Megamind is the best superVILLAIN movie of all time
Let’s say
Best Disney super hero film
And best dreamworks super hero film
No...
Best supervillain movie!
i do love me some megamind.
it's not better than incredibles though.
1:20 Cars 2
3:45 Brave & The Good Dinosaur
9:47 Cars
11:15 Onward
13:55 Incredibles 2
17:57 Monsters University
21:48 Cars 3
24:01 A Bug's Life
25:25 Toy Story
27:35 Finding Dory
30:13 Up
31:23 Finding Nemo
34:03 Inside Out
36:52 Toy Story 4
40:30 Soul
42:01 Coco
43:56 WALL-E
46:13 Toy Story 3
48:02 Monsters, Inc.
50:19 Toy Story 2
52:55 Ratatouille
53:38 The Incredibles
Man's a war criminal to rate the cars trilogy this low, cars 2 and 1 definitely need to go higher
Cars 2 is shot but cars 1 is amazing
what did the cars movies do to him 😂
@@fantafiz666 sorry I meant cars 2 is shit
@@fantafiz666also wdym sorry if I'm being rude but I don't know what you mean
Scaff: “The bad thing about Walle is that Auto is a bad villain”
Me, who believes Walle has no villain: “I’m going to allow that”
I mean they're not an antagonist but I'd say the corporations who fucked up the planet in wall-e were pretty villianous. And the ones doing the same thing IRL.
No clear villain makes the movie a lot better IMO...
Since in most cases (IRL) problems result more from bad behaviour of ordinary people instead of the acts of evil people.
@@metawarp7446 100% agreed.
Maybe humans were the real monsters :0
It kinda has a lorax vibe to it, everyone is doing what they believe is good, auto was ordered to keep humans in space at all costs and it just tried to do its duty
See, I like Auto as a villain because he’s an antithesis to every other robot in Wall-E, which goes against its programming to be able to develop their own personalities and make their own decisions. Meanwhile, Auto is following his programming to a T, to the point where he refuses to go back to Earth despite the plant being proof that life can’t flourish on Earth, just because he hasn’t received orders to do so from the ones who had programmed him in the first place.
I totally agree, and about the motivations thing, I can totally see them. Just look at the state of earth and how most humans are perfectly content with living on the axiom, the audience can connect the dots of auto’s motives on their own
Thank you
YES
Yes! Auto's whole shtick is is complete lack of humanity, to the point of being the only robot in the film to be voiced by an actual robot
Technically if they went back to Earth, Auto wouldn’t have a purpose anymore, so there’s his motivation for wanting to stay in the ship right there
Monsters Inc. definitely gave us the best musical of all time: “Put that thing out where it came from or so help me”.
I'm pretty sure he said "back", not "out".
'Hehe its a musical!
*Put that thing back where it came from or so help me! So help me so help me!'* And cut!
Ironically, the best musical was featured in a movie that was not a musical.
I unironically hum the actual theme of this movie at random moments.
Hamilton got nothin on this musical
As someone who grew up watching Cars 2, I would absolutely love a cinematic disaster review
same. I hate cars 2 with a burning passion
Cars 2 is my Shark Tale, I absolutely despise it yet I am infatuated with it
I like it (nostalgia), but I can admit that it is not a good sequel/movie
the only thing about the incredibles I didn’t like is that we didn’t know where Frozone’s super suit was
I think a deleted scene shows Honey hiding it in a cabinet to prevent him from going to save the world.
Honey ate his suit
@@Su1xq Impossible, Frozone appeared in his suit after that scene.
@@sonicfan9144 shut
@@sonicfan9144 she shat it out just before the big fight... obviously
The point of Wall-E's villian is that he had no character. A representation of the lifeless shells humanity was becoming if you will. No back story, no character, no emotion and the humans survived but didn't live. A machine. One could say the humans are less compelling than the robot protagonists because they've lived in such a shallow, souless environment for so long. Auto takes the "care" out of "character" in that he cares about nothing but his programming. The prefect obstical for a message that begs any eyeballs on the screen to feel deeply for life on earth and life as a whole.
Was just about to say this, but you said it better than I could have.
Holy shi-
I completely agree but I want to add a few things. I think he also represents the Mindset of humans of our era. He believes the plant is irreverent because the humans programmed him to think that. He represents men while the robots and the fat humans represent nature.
What do you expect from someone who thinks the big crab in Moana is a good villain. Laughable
@@MrSoso1050 I hate to say it but you're right. Tamatoa had nothing going for him imo...and his song wasn't even the best one in the movie
As a kid you never really realize how horrifying that computer scene from the incredibles really is honestly. It’s actually chilling
Also the part where Syndrome shoots down the plane while holding Mr. Incredible hostage, as a kid I never thought too much about it but I can't imagine what Mr. Incredible went through when he thought his wife and children were killed.
A cool thing that at least in portuguese, Dash and Syndrome had a phrase that was identical, Dash fighting with his mother says a phrase about being special, in the lines of "Saying that everyone is special is basically saying that no one is." and Syndrome has the Super line that everyone knows.
That is just cool
@@conic2721 ye he says that in the English version too I believe
I’d honestly say that’s probably the best scene in any Pixar movie
C h i l l s
"But for the love of God, don't make any more Toy Story movies. There's nowhere left to go for real this time. Please stop here. Thank You."
Ok, that didn't age well . . .
All I'm gonna say is that if this is not a spin off movie, this will probably be Tom Hank's worst role ever
I mean, Toy Story 4 was a banger, ngl
@@sethender443they mean the recent Toy Story 5 announcement
@@falcon8105 It will be hard to top Pinocchio.
"Why is AUTO just a boring villain with no personality and just doing what he is told?"
I think you're missing the point of AUTO's character and what the movie might be trying to get at with him. Perhaps not thinking for himself and just doing what he was programmed is what lead him to be a villain. The fact that he was so focused on following his directive is what lead him to literally put the whole ship in danger to keep it from returning to earth. I think part of the movie is telling us that blindly following instructions can lead to self destruction. WALL-E's only directive was to clean the earth, but he ended up developing a personality outside of his programming and ended up being the only survivor of his whole robotic race. I don't think that was a coincidence. The humans on the ship are so used to living their life hands off that when the captain hears about the prospect of going back to earth, he's afraid of the idea of actually having to take control of his own life instead of leaving it to the auto pilot. The humans are so blinded by technology that they didn't even know about the jogging track or the pool on the ship. There's definitely plenty of theme's that the movie incorporates that we can discuss, like how we blindly accept our culture of consumerism and materialism, however I have to disagree that the producers dropped the ball when writing AUTO's character.
I don't think the guy has seen 2001 Space Odyssey. Auto's artificial personality is on point. He doesn't want to be useless
I see what you're getting at, but they could've given him some personality. It kinda reminds of Jiren from Dragon Ball Super: they lean wayyy to heavily on a character being the an emotionless piece of bread, and could've made him more intimidating or sinister. A robot can have a personality but still follow it's programming to a T, like Hal from 2001. In Wall-E he's more an obstacle than a compelling antagonist.
What they said
@@frogglen6350 absolutely, 2001 is a huge inspiration for AUTO. It makes complete sense when looking at it in that frame
Schaff has actually stated he knows that Auto is just programming.
Either he doesn't know how programming works or forgot his own words.
In defense of Cars 3, when I took my ex-racer dad to the theatre to see it, he really identified with it and appreciated it going back to the roots of racing, that being the moonshiners. It's quality isn't great, but I really like it for the sole purpose that my dad was able to see alot of himself in it.
I'm still wondering how moonshine works in the Cars universe
Personally, I didn't like cars 3 compared to the first one
I think cars 3 was a solid movie. Nothing special about it but also nothing necessary awful either apart from a few of the choices they made plotwise
@@Kev24 To me the plot was just boring and the girl car was annoying. I also think it's weird that every time lightning McQueen gets character growth he goes back to being the same in the next movie
@@Kev24 yeah, that's one reason why this isn't Pixar's best franchise (along with the fact that there's no reason for them to be cars).
with all do respect, Barley has taught me WAY more about being a good older brother than I needed to learn.
“Why can’t he formulate his own opinion?”
Bruh, his name is literally AUTO
The whole point of the movie is being your own person. WHAT BETTER VILLAIN TO IT THAN A TOTALLY AUTOMATED MACHINE WHICH DOES ONLY WHAT IT WAS PROGRAMMED FOR AND TRIES TO MAKE EVERYONE BE AS OBEDIENT!? Really, it makes more sense than any other alternative.
I see your point and Auto’s contrast with the other robots is pretty genius.
But he would’ve been better with a personality ok bye
yeah. and he does have some emotion like breaking the button in an attempt to kill wall-e and stop the plant being installed
@@galaxystudios370 but that's a thing, his personality is a cold seemingly pragmatic control freak who serves commands, even if they were based on foolishness of corporations. It's not new or last time we see that trope, but it shows value of compassion compared to cold planning which makes you stuck.
you guys sound like the kind of people who think CinemaSins is legitimate film critique
It's kinda hilarious that someone who worked on the prince of egypt, lion king, and beauty and the beast was fired. Now I know why brave crashed and burned.
technically she was only a write to the lion king and batb but point stands
I guess you can say it was a BRAVE move that blew up in their faces
@@Joemam024 Sorry I think you wrote it wrong. It's not spelled BRAVE, it's spelled STUPID
She’s a amazing director but I still think Brave is just average not bad
Literally the worst decision ever
The only problem with Incredibles is there wasn't enough Frozone.
That’s fair
We also never got to see honeys face sadly
HONEY? YES? WHERE IS MY SUPER SUIT?
Absolutely
Mostly yeah
Yea p much
For me, I actually really like the story of Up. Even past the first 15 minutes. It's a charming story about a grumpy old man learning how to move on from the past. He spends most of the movie caught up on fulfilling his dead wife's dream, but then learns that the life they spent together was the best adventure she could have ever asked for.
As for your critique on Auto, I think what you said makes him boring actually makes him interesting as an AI villain. There's a video I saw that pointed this out really well how nothing Auto does is out of malice or evil intentions, but cold-hearted efficiency towards its prime directive: Keep humanity onboard the Axiom and make sure they stay safe.
When he mentioned that he didn’t cry during his Up rewatch, but cried during Coco I was like “No, there is no way Coco has a moment that will make me cry harder than that”. Then I went and watched Coco for the first time...
😭
Yeah man, we always think we won't cry...
Always...
Coco is the best pixar movie no cap
Yeah, no, I’ve watched both and both make me cry. But UP is definitely better, and made me cry harder. UP is a masterpiece and makes you sob in the first five minutes, and possibly multiple times throughout the movie. That’s impressive
@@yuilinkmat9469 I never cried when I saw up but my first watch of coco I cried. Up nearly made me cry
me, watching coco for the 4th time: i won't cry this time i swear
mama coco and miguel: sings remember me together
me, already grabbing 2 tissues: ...god damn it
The Good Dinosaur is just a flex on how good they can make landscapes
nice username bro
Facts through
The Good Landscapes
they just gave up on the story and went: “ah fuck it. let’s just have fun doodling.”
The Good Dinosaur is basically PG Primal
Monsters inc. is so iconic. One time my middle school hallway lights flickered and then turned black and we all were screaming 2319
comedy G O L D
Lmao
r/thathappened
@@humanperson6372 nothing ever happens
@@thisisaterribleargument_but Are you really suggesting that this is true? In the movie, 2319 means a sock stuck on someone’s back. Are you saying that they all immediately connected lights turning off to a fucking sock, and then immediately shared that?
44:27 The robots being complex IS the reason why Auto is so basic, and that IS the contrast to Wall-E and Eve narratively. I don’t think they could have made a better villain than this one, if you ask me. So this section misses the mark for me, but at least we are in agreement that everything else is amazing lol
AUTO*
@@MorganKing95 shhhh you never saw that (thx lol)
Literally, every criticism he made about AUTO in WALL-E is the point. WALL-E is full of personality. He is unique while still following his programming. AUTO is the antithesis to WALL-E. He has no personality and only follows programming
To me, if auto was more 3d to his character that would be more interesting
Yeah Schaffrilas is kind of a big bruh moment
Especially with his cringy tamatoa kink
@@jasminelai8829 I think it would muddy the message tbh, the whole point was that the conflict was caused by mindless short sightedness incapable of seeing the bigger picture, or it simply didnt matter, Auto encapsulated that perfectly.
My theory is that his development of a personality and the ability to think for himself is the only thing that let WALL-E survive. He was able to adapt unlike all the other WALL-E units. AUTO can’t adapt or ignore his orders, so even if he could think for himself, he would still assume survival is impossible. I don’t know if I worded that well.
@@shady8045 ahh gotcha
Schaffrilas: "Please don't make more Toy story sequels."
Pixar: "He didn't say anything about Spin-offs."
And shorts. (Lamp Life for example).
27:34
Tbh If Disney wants to continually milk the Toy Story franchise, I’d much rather a cool Buzz Lightyear spin off than a Toy Story 5
@@IcyDiamond facts
To be fair, I love me some Toy Story shorts!
Fun fact about Coco, surveys done in retirement homes have actually shown that music has the potential to help people with things such as dementia.
Dementia... Everywhere at the end of time
@@theununtrium It's just a burning memory
@@hatsunemikuenjoyer6900 We don't have many days
@@hatsunemikuenjoyer6900 I'M LITERALLY LISTENING TO THIS ON LOOP.
h place on the world fades away
So we watched cars 2 in English class (second language to us, so we do basically nothing) and it was the greatest cinematic experience of all time. 10/10, spy cars are great and no one can tell me otherwise.
cars 2 is 0/10 😂 ur a weirdo
Finally someone agrees with me! I'm glad someone else likes Cars 2!
I have to completely agree, Cars 2 has the extra amount of bullshittery and crazyness that makes it an actually great movie. The living cars get a fucking spy movie with guns and lasers and torturing a spy car to death in the first act. Bcs fuck you, that's why.
@@epzonah you’re wrong. 10/10 movie
@@epzoit was one of the first movies I watched as a kid, and I don’t want to have some weirdo n RUclips taking things way too serio ruining my pure image of the movie
I really like that Schaf will point out stuff that's bad about movies, but will also say 'if it makes you happy and you relate to it, then that's worth the movie existing alone'
And thats the only thing that matters at the end of the day. Movies are made for entertainment, so if you have a good time watching a film, no matter what quality that film might be objectively, then it deserves to exist.
@@joshevans3421 Facts
@@joshevans3421 Unless that movie is Cats, in which case, those principles do not apply :D
@@rickygforce4217 No. Blind people can still enjoy cats
@@joshevans3421 With James Corden's voice? naw
I think the reason why Joy’s arc works better is because there’s real meaning behind it. The film’s a metaphor for emotions (no shit) and Joy’s arc is a metaphor for how toxic positivity leads to burnout and it’s ok to be sad, which is a legit thing that kids and their parents should realise
Absolutely
Toxic positivity sounds like a word miserable people would use to shame others into feeling down because they hate other peoples happiness
@@oklahomacityradiowaves5462 someone didn’t watch the movie lol
@@Turt3752 :)
@@oklahomacityradiowaves5462 Toxic Positivity simply is the idea that one always has to be happy and things are always fine. Part of being happy is being sad, and bad things will inevitably happen. You shouldn't shame someone for being happy but you also shouldn't dismiss feelings of sadness and such.
As a kid, I always loved that they didn’t make Jessie a love interest for Woody. Obviously he had Bo Peep but it would have been so easy to do cowgirl likes cowboy. And I actually like the connection of Buzz and her liking each other. Cute and from different worlds.
Aren't they supposed to basically be related since they're from the same line of toys? Kinda would be implying some slight incest if you make them love interests
@@xdeathcon wouldnt that make barbie and ken incestuous too
@@xdeathcon first of all: your mind is sick, stop watching porn.
Secondly, wtf, this line of thought doesn’t make any sense. A husband and his wife are still “family” but there’s nothing creepy about it, Woody and Jesse can be from the same line and not be siblings. Also, did you forget that Mr and Mrs Potato Head are also from the same toy line? Is there any in***t in their relationship?
@@pedrorenault5335 idk man it's just a stupid head canon theory thing I came up with at like 2 am. Also Mr. and Mrs. Potato Head are made specifically to be married together judging by their titles.
@@pedrorenault5335 Bro you're getting heated over a mild offhand comment about some toys from a kid's movie lmfao chill
The whole buzz’s inner voice thing sounded like it was gonna resolve at the end, when he kept turning on the thing and it kept saying leave, I thought his conscious was gonna tell him otherwise and for him to defy his voice buttons. But instead he sarcastically says “thanks inner voice” and listens to it anyway
Ngl I was a little disappointed you didn't see the message in AUTO, blindly following directions leading to actually doing more harm than good.
"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not."
But the point tht machines are like us and have personality except AUTO didn't matched too well with the theme I guess
@@italucenaz The point is more about change. AUTO was unable to change
who was creative enough to write the entire story of a rat who was secretly a chef? That's gold
It's a rat cooking. Omg he probably smelled alot of coke to think on that. I couldn't.
He did a whole video on Ratatouille and talks about the writer in it. It's Brad Bird, he also produced the incredibles, Iron Giant, helped with Jassisic World, a lot of the pixar shorts, and even more.
Pretty talented guy I must say, but @Vinicius is right, he prolly doing a lot of drugs lmao
@@outoftheembers9053 I know right. I saw this video 3 times and my point still stick to me how does he tought on that
Even though he is credited as the director, Brad Bird didn't actually come up with the concept of the movie. Ratatouille is the brain child of Jan Pinkava in 2000. The movie was stuck in development hell for years until executives lost confidence in him as a director and they handed the project over to Brad Bird, where he had to turn the production around in 18 months. Looking at deleted scenes and marketing, it looks a lot like Ratatouille was originally going to be a heist movie, and then when Brad Bird took over, he turned it into an art house film.
@@dr.heinzdoofenshmirtz4759 “smelled alot of coke”
Okay, kiddo, time for bed.
Hearing James Corden's voice coming out of Barley nearly gave me a heart attack
And then Jack Black settled it down a bit
I never realized how amazing Jack Black as Barley would’ve been until he showed me
@@nezaniatoimya I agree. eww Stay away James Corden!
LOL whu?
The fact I know that audio is from The Emoji Movie
Stay strong Schaff, I watched you in a time where it was very difficult to me.
I will never know what this pain is, but I want you to know that I, and others, appreciate you.
Somewhere there is an alternative reality when the original director for Brave wasn't fired and the movie is one of the best works from Pixar.
I want to visit it. I bet it is also the timeline where Balan Wonderworld was actually a good game
Would be better if a timeline that every animated movie is super good
@@KazuhaEien and where lucasfilm wasn't owned by disney
and where woke feminism didnt exist
@@g3n371 ok then
“You know what finding Nemo has?”
Lol what
“A net, you know what also has a net?”
This is gonna be an ad isn’t it
“The interne-“
*rapidly taps the right side of the screen*
Same
Lmao same
In my case **rapidly mashes L**
I was about to comment that.
The early bird gets the worm i guess
Exactly what I did too
Finding Nemo gives off strong “lives in the car’s DVD player” vibes and I don’t know how to feel about that
So true
I’ve never had one but now that you say it...
y'all had some privileged ass childhoods if your family actually had a DVD player in their car.
@@antipsychotic451 I guess for some of us it's "lives in the friend's car's DVD player" vibes. Nostalgic yet unappetizing
Finding Nemo is one of those movies you think you wanna watch but after like 5-10 minutes, you're no longer interested
I don’t know why specifically, but Coco will always be one of my personal favorite Pixar movies of all time, simply because of the twist villain, the music, and the absolutely phenomenal emotional climax and ending, this is the only movie that has ever made me cry, and I still choke up at the ending to this day
Have you by any chance watched interstellar?
@@f5tornado831 ok I should specify, the only ANIMATED movie to make me cry
For me, it's Monsters University. If you ask me, it's the most fun and entertaining movie in Pixar, it's also taught us a good life lesson, I would say, movies like Ratatouille, Coco, Soul I find them descent.
Schaff: "Why does the villian in WALL-E blindly follows his programming but the other good personified robots don't???" [44:19]
Pixar: _"Because that's... the point?"_
Isn’t auto meant to literally be Anti WallE? As in wallE has a personality and Auto doesn’t
You could say he is AUTOmatic.
Holy crap i never even thought of it that way, that's such a good point
But why is the robot the only one who will always follow their programming?
@@tanner201x8 because he’s the antagonist. One of the messages of the film is don’t blindly follow orders, have your own personality. So of course the bad guy isn’t gonna do that
Can we all agree that Mysterio in Spider-Man: Far From Home was basically the Screenslaver done 100 times better?
Yeah, I agree
Tbf they have like decades of comics and cartoons etc to base the Mysterio character on.
Yes
@@hhhhhh-vk9wk I mean, technically so does Pixar. Art is iterative. The Incredibles 2 absolutely could have looked towards any other work of art and used it as inspiration when constructing its own villain. It could have been the same in everything but name really.
yes
Fun Fact: Test audiences who sympathized with Lotso for his backstory wanted him to push the button in the incinerator scene to redeem himself.
However, according to the DVD commentary, director Lee Unkrich explained that the filmmakers decided to drop Lotso's chance for redemption in order to make the audience who had gotten to know Andy's toys over the past 15 years in three movies care about the characters even more as they went to the fire, when it looked like the end for them before the Squeeze Toy Aliens rescued them with the claw.
Pixar literally just wanted to kill everyone emotionally with that movie (and they succeeded in the best way possible)
Cars 2 actually had an amazing score tho, that intro sequence is fucking fire
I KNOW RIGHT
Yeah the one unironically and non-nostalgic-affected good part about it it
The intro from cars is better than cars 2 by mies
I would say the whole soundtrack was awesome
Honestly, I think he’s just too hard on all of Cars as a franchise. Cars is a fantastic movie, and I’d definitely put it higher on the list. Sure, the concept is weird, but it’s not enough to ruin the movie, or even make it less than great. The entire movie is great, but the third act race was genuinely incredible. Cars 2 definitely places lower, but it’s still a good movie in itself, as long as you accept that it really should have been marketed as a feature-length Mater’s Tall Tales and not a sequel to Cars.
What I find hysterical about cars 3 is that they don’t acknowledge anything about cars 2. It’s like Pixar said “ yeah, we fucked up; so here’s a movie with no more spy stuff and less Mater”
Fr my fav part is that cars 3 pretends that cars 2 didn’t even exist,I’m pretty sure that at this point it being a Mater’s fairytale is canon
ok why am i literally the only person who likes cars 2 like i genuinely love that movie 😔
That was my favorite one (of cars movies)
@@xiiwolfy You are not alone
I loved it for the car culture in seeing cars from across the ages and the engine noises are heaven. Mater is ok but I agree he isn't strong
I feel that the majority of unrest regarding Cars 2 derives from its disruption of the McQueen story. If it were just a spin-off movie, I think it would’ve received far less attack
Zooming into random faces: the foolproof way to make me laugh
Yup they get way funnier the more tired you are
The Office?.
Can I we just appreciate the effort and small details on the video thumbnail?
-Mike’s face being covered up just like the commercial he starred in the movie.
-Edna and Disgust essentially making the same pose, while being next to each other; a very interesting parallel.
-Nemo, is hidden in the thumbnail, unlike Dory and Marlin who take front stage, you gotta FIND NEMO. :)
-The fact that the Ellie and Carl’s house from UP is seen in the distance, emphasizing that it’s high UP in the sky!
-And Anton Ego looking real confused by Forky.
I mean he’s seen Rats cook, but never a talking fork!
-and there are probably way more references that I missed, but like:
I just love this thumbnail so so much.
Now do the dreamworks thumbnail
Hidden A113
Even Joy is waving from the Pizza Planet Truck. She just wants to give you a free pizza
thanks for this fun observation. now I'm gonna stare at this thumbnail for a while
Linguini is horrified at Anger's fire like how he was first revealed in the movie
Can't wait for Toy Story 5 to delve deep into the Human vs. Toys war, where toys realize they don't want to be play things and start to rebel.
No instead we get gen alpha brainrot
I had the exact same idea, but with toy genocide and slavery instead.
Has anyone else realized that cars and Thor have the exact same plot
1. Character has been separated from his world
2. is forced to sit in a small town and rediscover themselves
3. Finds a way to get back to said world and fights for the honor of the small town.
I grew up loving Cars and Wall E as a kid, however when I saw Thor in theaters originally, I had to leave due to it being to scary for kid me, I still haven’t seen it, same happened with Green Lantern in the same year, however my middle school okayed some of that movie and it was whatever I guess
That is a lot of movies XD
And in both cases the second movie is terrible
There is a green guy too
Owned by disney
The only thing i can remember from cars 2 was when the bad guys fucking tortured and killed a car
Rated G
I remember child me having crush on the female cars. Tf was wrong with child me ._.
He was also disables, and cars 2 was kinda eugenics propaganda
I remember when they crushed alive a car, like wtf
This stuff was my favorite thing about it. All of the action sequences were dope.
What haunts me is if Pixar ever made a sequel to Ratatouille not only it would be probably be worse but more importantly they would name it rataTWOille
You know, I have a feeling Pixar is crazy enough to make like a back story of Toy Story
@@luisn642 they are making a new toy story movie about Buzz. Not the toy, but the fictional character the toy is based on.
@@ThomasTiberio-qf9wd gotta make that cash unfortunately. Ugh. So much excess
@@JorgeGomez-hx5uu if they’re gonna milk the franchise, I’d rather them make a spin off than a Toy Story 5
@Victor Greenwood hmmm. Didn’t know that. But I will still stand by my point about Disney not giving two flying fucks about creativity lmao. Wish they brought back 2D animation. Btw I’m not mad at you. Just that it really irks me when so little effort is given to things that could go towards better projects.
Finding Dory isn't my favorite Pixar film. It's not even in my top 3. But my God, if it doesn't have one of my favorite scenes in any animated movie ever. As someone with ADHD, this scene right here 29:33 makes me absolutely sob every time I watch it. Yes, Dory's forgetfulness can be funny and is often played for jokes, but it's also handled with so much genuine care and heart in this movie. Like, this scene REALLY captures what it is like to have a disability like hers. When Dory finds her parents again, she breaks down into tears and immediately apologizes, saying she's so sorry for being forgetful, and she wishes she wasn't but she just can't help it. And how do her parents respond? By telling her it's ok, because she found them again. And not only that, she did it on her own, and gained more confidence in herself in the process too. Like...wow. Not only is that incredibly touching, it's also extremely relatable for people like me who ACTUALLY have disabilities that affect our memory. I've had basically that exact conversation with my parents in real life. Feeling guilty and apologizing for times my ADHD has caused me to mess up and forget important things, but then being reassure by my parents that it's ok, and they are still proud of me and my accomplishments even if sometimes I also have failures. It's a scene that makes me grateful for my family, which is exactly what I believe the goal of the scene was. I really cannot sing its praises enough. I feel like whoever wrote it just...understands. Around the time this film was made, a lot of people were joking about how Disney and Pixar were just trying as hard as possible to make audiences cry during their movies so that they could get nominated for Oscars. But this scene doesn't feel that way. It's one of the most genuine, most relatable, most heartwarming scenes I have ever watched from Pixar. And it keeps me coming back to Finding Dory over and over even in spite of it not being one of my favorite movies. It's just that good of a scene.
Movie character: *Screams*
Schaffrillas: _"Now this looks like a Gangsta's Paradise moment"_
That's what I'm saying.
Timestamp?
OOOAAAAAAAA-
AAAAAAAUAAAAAAAAAA
@@snowleopard064 one of them is at around 7:03 but there’s many more probably lol
"Finding Nemo is saying the least." It pits a character too obsessed with the past to let his son live his life (which ultimately pushes his son away to near death) up against a character who is practically unable to remember the past (and thus acts impulsively). In the end, Marlin realizes that he has to find balance between the two and ultimately trust his son. It's also about disability - obviously Dory's disability, but also Nemo's. Nemo has never known life without two functional fins, but that's all Marlin sees when he sees Nemo. He sees a fish that's weak and incapable and, by the end, has to understand that Nemo is capable in his own way (aka: Finding Nemo). I actually find Finding Nemo's themes to be deeper than people give it credit for. That scene inside the whale is one of the best that Pixar has ever done. "How do you know something bad isn't going to happen?" "I don't." Good shit.
Plus, the music is fuckin fire.
It's funny, out of all the movies Pixar has done it's probably one of the few that also quite literally repeats one of its core messages as well with the conclusion having the phrase be a mantra that gets repeated in order to save everyone: "Just keep swimming"
Exactly, my favorite Pixar movie because of how strong those characters are. The entirety of the scenes inside the whale are some of the most influential animated scenes I've ever watched.
That's one of the reasons that Finding Nemo will forever be my favorite pixar film.
For real people don’t give it enough credit, it’s one of my Pixar favorite films
I love it for all these reasons and more, as well as that Finding Nemo is what got me into marine biology
Honestly for a while I forgot that mike doesn’t actually have sully’s face
Man Mike can't catch a break can he
I was kinda expecting Schaff to edit it over XD
Mike is a meme legend
Most of them call Mr. Wisowzki
I mean otto is genius because he is the only realistic robot villain, he does not feel, he does not think, he is programmed and it makes sense for him to be the villain since wall-e and eve seem to feel, every single robot seems to feel except the villain one
I never got above the absolute heartsplitter that is buzz realizing he isn't a special space ranger destined to save the galaxy. The cold dismissal of the truth, under the truck. The shock as he sees the comercial for the buzz toy on the TV. The moment of absolute grief before he resolves to overcome his mundanity, climbing up the stair's railing and taking his best shot at proving to himself he can be special.
And then he fails it.
Having wagered life, limb, and Ego, he is faced with the truly horrifying reality that he is not special. He is something as mundane as a toy. He ends up getting way too deep in his cups, and ends up with a genuine depressed apathy, at the realization that he can't save the world.
His road out of this funk, is not only the lesson from woody that "even if you can't save the world, you can still make somebody else happy, and that is important", but it also comes in the opportunity to help woody out of the box, instantly proving the point.
From there, buzz' finds that even if he isn't a special space ranger who can save the galaxy, he is talented, and actually does have wings he can use to reach Andy. He actually is special, but in a much more mundane way, and that is wonderful.
Buzz' arc in toy story 1, is not entirely dissimilar to the one faced by Woody in TS2, but the fact that his delusion is something he has believed the entire time, and he has to not only overcome his own fear of mortality, but his entire life's illusion, means that it hits way deeper for me. Woody overcoming death seems a less challenging thing than buzz overcoming his life.
People will obviously be different, and for people who didn't enter their teens with a belief that they were special and talented won't resonate with buzz that strongly.
But to me, who had to come to terms with the harsh reality that talent isn't special, Buzz' story in Toy Story 1 has a very special place in my heart.
I agree, I just rewatched the movie and the buzz scene was just so well made, even the score was beautiful and tender when he tried to fly out of the window. Also the overall movie’s soundtrack is just fantastic in my opinion.
Woody overcoming death seems a less challenging thing than buzz overcoming his life.
That is such a powerful sentence. Thank you.
“Toy Story 1 is the weakest Toy Story movie but it’s also the funniest one”
Oh my gosh! I thought I was alone in thinking that!!!
I disagree, Toy Story 1 is better than 4, but it's his opinion
I thought I was alone in thinking that as well
The first one is my favorite lmao
BUZZ, LOOK! AN ALIEN!!
I think it’s weakest toy story too I think Woody is pretty funny but he’s kinda a jerk and a bit of a villain in the first act
I can't believe you ranked Cars so low when it has the hardest scene in cinematic history, the introduction of DJ, Boost, Wingo and Snot Rod
@Camila Gomez now that you say it, it sounds so dumb
Oh please, the hardest scene in cinematic history is when Megamind’s robots dress him in the Black Mamba and the camera slowly pans out and you see him dripping in glory as he narrowly gazes at the camera with his arms out and the EPIC music plays in the background... yeah
The Intro is the Piston Cup Race where we see Lightning McQueen Chick Hicks and The King racing along a buttload of cars from cameos such as Dale Earnhardt Jr. And an Apple Car who has the number of 84 referencing the Macintosh the scene Dj boost wingo and snot rod let’s Mack go to sleep is after the Mack and McQueen conversation after the life is a highway scene😥
@@gerremyajoseph6365 I’m pretty sure it’s the I Like To Move It Move It I Like To Move It Move It We Like To.....
yea I know where all the dislikes are coming from.
I absolutely love Toy Story, it feels like an S Tier Dreamworks movie. It isn’t a great all around movie, but is unbelievably hilarious.
The monsters ink comment where you said “why didn’t the dean put the can in a glass case” I felt that. It always makes me mad. why would she have it in a classroom with college students? Obviously someone is gonna be clumsy
I went: HOLY SHIT THAT'S SO RIGHT when he said that
Anyone else almost piss themselves when the dean came on screen? Like JEEZ I get that she's supposed to have an ominous presence but she REALLY freaked me out when I first saw her on the big screen.
Damn I wasn’t even alive when monster university comed out
@@Flome810 are you 9 years old
@@Flome810 how old are you
Pixar has two main strengths
The humor in the more child friendly ones
The story in the more adult directed ones
And then there’s cars 2 without either
and i still love it
Ew
@@martys9568 thanks for sharing! Remember, it’s ok to share your opinion, even if it is wrong
Cars 2 was hilarious and silly. Idk it kinda introduced the spy genre to me as a kid
@@martys9568 same bro
I have a slight issue with the first "problem" with Coco being "it isn't funny". I appreciated Coco for being less funny and taking itself more seriously considering the ideas that its trying to convey.
I agree, but I feel like what he was trying to say was that the jokes don’t land.
I agree with you on that, the lack of humor makes the emotional bits pack more of a punch than 'planned funny movies'
But it did try to be funny at times. His problem is it failed at being funny, not that it didn't try.
Intro 0:13
23 Cars 2 1:19
22/21 Brave and The Good Dinosaur 3:45
20 Cars 9:47
19 Onward 11:15
18 The Incredibles 2 13:55
17 Monsters University 17:57
16 Cars 3 21:47
15 A Bugs Life 24:01
14 Toy Story 25:25
13 Finding Dory 27:35
12 Up 30:13
11 Finding Nemo 31:23
SquareSpace 32:36
10 Inside Out 34:03
9 Toy Story 4 36:53
8 Soul 40:30
7 Coco 42:01
6 Wall-E 43:56
Auto is the product of his environment. He has been told for almost 700 years that earth is unsustainable and all is lost. He is the culmination of the themes in this movie. This film is about rejecting luxury and orders, and learning to have free will. Auto is everything this film is warning us about, and delivers with an amazing example. He is a robot that blindly follows orders and acts on them which only cripples humanity even further. His main philosophy is: "Good soldiers follow orders". The fact that he is literally the autopilot of the ship makes this just too perfect.
Exactly
Yo got that reference
Hwta
So what you’re saying is... Wall-E is a communist...
@@whiskeyshaw8818 You mean Auto?
As defence for AUTO, he does actually have a motivation for not going back to Earth besides his programming. If everyone went back to earth, he would have no power over anyone like he does on the Axium. This is also shown in the scene where you can see him slowly get closer in the photos showing each captain from the past, showing he is taking control of the Axium rather than just following his only programming of not returning to Earth. He gains his own goal that is to have sheer power over everything.
I agree, but I also feel like Schaff is right too in that his character feels weak compared to the other robots. That one line where he says "irrelevant" is a bit too short for the weight of the conversation. i honestly love when he talks, i wish he had said something sinister (and longer) like "earth is no longer salvageable. there is no positive chance for reclamation." to show his programming mixed in with his character as a overcontrolling computer AI.
I have a way simpler explanation for AUTO in that, he's old. Old fashioned. Like, not only is he basic in programming and motives, he uses a Text-To-Speech for a voice, has been there since the beginning of the Axiom, and has stayed true to his objectives throughout. If he were to change his mind earlier, the Axiom wouldn't have stuck the course, as I'm sure some of the earlier captains, at some point, would've wondered about returning before they completely forgot about it.
@Yeet Yote AUTO as in Autopilot
@@javiiibot5887 I think it was the point that Auto had no personality, he's the obedient, stoic computer villain to contrast the emotional, deep robot heroes.
@@GeneralJaydonius I really enjoy your explanation. It diverges from the overdone characterization of "machines want to take over / don't have feelings" (like Terminator and I, Robot), and is also a lot more relevant as a modern fable. Auto's background that you highlighted is also something very interesting to consider.
Fun fact, There is 19 deaths in cars 2 making it one of the most gruesome Pixar movies
Do not ask me why I know this
@@fatpeebmonkeywhy4278 cars 2 kill count video?
That's honestly my favorite part of the entire movie. I love to think about how it would be like if they were humans and the super gruesome deaths.
I just liked the way that some of the bad guy cars in the opening sequence just fell down and drowned.
Pardon 😃
2:29
Schaff: *Cars 2 is worse than the worst DreamWorks movies.*
Megamind 2: *Hold my dehydration gun*
well megamind 2 isn't an animated feature but still.
Bro magamind the button of doom is good.
BRAVE STANDS 1000X BETTER THAN SHREK THE TURD, MEGAMIME 2, SHIT TALE, ETC.
True, totally…f…ing…true.
@@AdrianAnimations360Sure, but it’s truly underrated.
Listen to Megamind The Button Of Doom & ignore 💦🍆.
💦🍆-Peacock.
Hearing what they did to the only female Pixar director infuriated me to another level omfg
just chill knowing that in an alternative universe they didn't fire the original director and Brave is a better movie
Hopefully if Pixar ever hired another female director, they keep her for that movie and not fire her like she was nothing.
While I thought Brave was okay and not as terrible as other people say, the way they treated the director WAS HORRIBLE!!!! In fact, it could have been a break-the-glass-ceiling movie and was actually a masterpiece.
who made the best dreamworks movie like ughhhhh
@@enzomottacodeco7795 reality shifting doesn't exist! watch the odd1sout's vid.
“Woody is a dick for so long”
bruh have you seen the original portrayal of Woody?
He legit attempted murder on Buzz and even verbally abused Slinky
That doesn't make him less bad tho
@@deadaccount8054 in the final feature, you at least get to see Woody’s perspective and how he’ll start to hate Buzz. That, and he didn’t mean to throw Buzz out of the window, but just knock him behind the furniture instead. It’s just that things went out of his control from that point.
I read the first part of this comment very wrong....
@@justalula7151 it’s a great but provocative name am I right 😂
@@linkxmidna57 I mean it sure is lol ...like Fun fact : In the Philippines, they have this like toy man made of wood where hes wearing a barrel and when you take it off you can see his "woody" ahahaha
Ok fine but when mator said
“HE DID WHAT IN HIS CUP!?”
Comedy peaked
Damn right
Was waiting for the praise for that line which never happened
fact
Probably laugh at Hazbin Hotel lmao
That was pretty funny.
Inside Out is probably my favorite Pixar movie, standing right next to Soul and the Incredibles. I like The Incredibles because it's just incredibly (pun intended) entertaining. But Soul and Insides out are the only movies that really make me look at myself and think "what am I doing with my life?". They're just so relatable
Toy Story 3 is Andy's conclusion whereas Toy Story 4 is Woody's conclusion.
Yeah basically
That's an excellent way of putting it that I didn't think of before...
*sppy talking* CORRECT
Ikr, it's much more fun when both guys conclude at the same time
imo Woody has always been THE main character, so I found it fitting that he had his own meaningful conclusion.
I was getting nervous with Ralph Breaks the Internet, but that wasn’t Pixar.
Woah, I forgot about that
Bruhhhh
I came to read the comments during the top 10 commercial break and “oh no he hasn’t ranked ralph breaks the internet yet and we’re on NEMO” suddenly dawned on me, and i started freaking out. Thanks for clarifying that i don’t have to worry about that being ranked here
Yeah
And not even anyone knows that it’s also their 57th motion picture in this reality.
I was expecting a Big Hero 6 reference and It never happened, I now feel disappointed, but I guess It was my mistake
😂😂🤣
that was his mistake
The movie was kinda bad though would have been SOOO much more interesting if it actually went with the robot route
There was one. Callahan was Schaff's professor when he was in college and talking about Monsters University.
We was all waiting for it man
I loved your input to Soul - this movie means a lot to me because it just came out when I was at a very low and lonely place in my life. This movie benefited my mental health so much, I still tear up whenever I see the scene at the piano with the montage of all of 22s adventures in a real human body. This movie made me feel alive again and I’m so so thankful for this to exist ❤
Mike Wasowski: “so we’re just gonna waltz right up to the factory right?”
1 second later
Mike: “I cannot believe we are waltzing right up to the factory.”
Comedy Gold
Comedy silver
Comedy bronze
Comedy... uh... plastic
Comedy wood
Comedy Air
I think Buzz's existential crisis in Toy Story -- realizing his whole identity is a lie -- is very powerful and also hilarious
idk how he didn't like toy story as much as i did, i genuinely thought that was the perfect pixar movie.
i think you mean mrs. nezbit. huaHAHAHAHAHAh
@@thebiolibrary5572 Lmaoo, that bit was the fcking best
Years of academy training WASTED!!!
It’s hilarious because what! I mean don’t get me wrong I used to love every toy story movie but buzz having a existential crisis in toy story 1 is not only powerful, but less hilarious and more serious. However toy story 2 did at least made a follow up buzz’s storyline, and while toy story 3 is the best toy story movie it’s just that buzz being Spanish while funny he only speaks Spanish after he was switched to demo mode and none of andys toys ever considered switching back to play mode😥 man that was long😥
AUTO may not be a deep or complex villain but he is thematically appropriate for Wall-E. The movies main message with it's environmental stance is "things get better when we take action". AUTO is the embodiment of "do what is easiest: what you're told to do." He represents humanities tendency to take the easy route whenever possible, while Wall-E is humanity's curiosity, passion and independence. As a kid he genuinely terrified me because he was the only Pixar villain to actually harm the protagonist in a deep and real way (syndrome gets close, but he only ever scratches Mr. Incredible) AUTO short circuiting Wall-E in such a personal and visceral way with zero hesitation is an amazing analogy for how corporate policy exists to stamp out that drive and independence in it's participants and it stuck with me from my first viewing to this day.
Agreed. Wall•E is my favorite movie ever, and while I get his perspective with how he wants a certain kind of villain that AUTO isn’t, I think he’s missing why AUTO acts like he does. To be honest, it’s more of a subversion of that expected AI-becoming-a-human thing like HAL from 2001, which he is a visual reference to: he is completely emotionally absent. Which is pretty much what a human can become when overtaken my immense greed. And even other robots found a way to be unique and go against their programing. But AUTO follows directions unflinchingly. He is willing to kill Wall•E to achieve the mission of greedy humans who created him, to stay on the Axiom in a sleepwalking state of mediocrity forever. And that makes AUTO terrifying. He may not be the type of villain Schaffrillas personally likes the most, but he’s the perfect villian for the film.
FACTS
AUTO looks like a villain from portal
@@devinskoglund6320"you are a horrible person"
this is honestly such a great perspective! i agreed with schaff’s views on AUTO, and even though i still have my gripes about him i love this perspective, too.
40:26
Bob Iger: *makes Toy Story 5 a thing*
Me: Oh sorry, you were saying?
"I don't rate a movie's quality solely on relatability"
It's amazing how much I related to this
*_(insert SrPelo's "Wow! That is relatable!" clip here)_*
Ironic, he could save others from relatability but not himself
@@TheAkingofengland I got my daily dose of real laughter from this, thanks a bunch XD
The fact that Schaff noticed that the lighting told the story in soul really made me realize why I subscribe to him.
Yes
It's one of those things that people make fun of English teachers for, but Schaff just makes you feel the same way.
@@dasoupsoup it’s also a theater thing which is ironic because he has said that he was a musical theater person when he was in school
“Relatability to a movie does not mean that the movie is good” AUTOMATICALLY THE BEST VIDEO ON THIS WHOLE WEBSITE THANK YOU
I agreed with that line. I can relate with the struggles of Bob in Math, but Incredibles 2 hasn’t aged well since its release
@@noobmasterruben5167 when a movie released 3 years ago aged more than even older Pixar movies
Wrong! This video still sucks, and you have bad taste!
The Deep-Deep Dive theme from Kirby’s Epic Yarn behind Finding Dory is to die for - love your music choices!
"I guess Woody is the villain in Toy Story 1 then!"
You should look up the history of this films development, you're in for a fucking treat.
Oh he definitely knows about the Black Friday reel. I remember his older YTPs using them as a source in one of them
I honestly would like to see that film.
Wood is no villan he good guy who mak mistake becase he overcum by his pride.
@@thefalseflaminggnemu7669
You've missed the point so much, it's got its own area code.
@@N-GinAndTonicTM are you saying he is the villain, I thought you were joking
I’d say Brave is better then The Good Dinosaur. Not by much, but at least it shows a perspective on Scottish culture.
Ye I live in Edinburgh (not Scottish tho) and people in my school rlly like it mostly coz of Scottish culture and stuff so I usually talk to people about Pixar who think Brave is one of the best Pixar films, and when Schaffrilas put it near the bottom I realised how much it would trigger my friends
What about dinosaur culture?
@@TherealKevin865 If they didn't draw a weird Circle some point in history, they aren't a culture.
@@C.N.D._The_72nd deez nuts ain't a culture
@@TherealKevin865 more than likely
Monsters inc is honestly a masterpiece of it’s time. It’s such a nostalgic movie plus the villains in this film is one of Pixar’s best Villains.
It is easily in my top 5 in terms of nostalgia backing it up.
I loved it as a kid, and I love it now.
I have no nostalgia to Monsters Inc,but its in my Top 3 Favorite Movies of all time
@@GoodSaulman_is_McJimmyGill same I grew up with Ratatouille,Walle,Shrek and others but had never seen monsters inc before. Now its my top 5 once I watched it
Idk why but I read this as “Monsters inc *university” and proceeded to be deeply confused for longer than I’d like to admit 😭
I don’t like the movie because it doesn’t have a lively and expressive atmosphere like monsters university, I also don’t really find the jokes laugh out loud funny.
"How come the giant wave killed arlos dad but not him?!"
Well you could argue its because of that fact that arlo knew how to swim and his dad didnt
I actually thought making Auto this soulless slave to his programming was a good decision. As you point out, every other robot in the story has a personality. But that's kinda the point. Wall-E and Eve and all the other robots are the good guys BECAUSE the stray from their programming in one way or the other. Hell, Eve is portrayed as the terminator for most of Act 1 because she's just following her programing, everything else be damned. It's only after she finds the plant and is separated from the goal of her programing on the spaceship that she becomes an actual character.
Agreed:
1. IDK why the EVEs are just apple-made terminators but it’s true - you make a sound near one and it’ll blow you to bits, and why supersonic flight?
2. What you said about them straying from their programming is pretty on-point. If Auto could stray from his programming, I think his motivation would be this: he’s spent 700 years fulfilling his directives, but what happens when they return to Earth? Auto would have no purpose, and he isn’t like the other robots in a sense that they can *leave* the ship - Auto is a wheel literally tethered to the ceiling. He would be stuck their with no purpose or company. I like to think that this was his real motivation, and not just, y’know... being a bot.
@@ChrystalGek well it would make sense for EVE to be made by apple because...well...
Cars 2 is so bad that they used a joke about an old dude pissing himself in public as a PLOT DEVICE
When was that part in the movie?
i was actually gonna watch cars 2 to see if it was actually that bad but im just gonna take your word for it
Old cars leak oil
I love Cars 2 just for nostalgia. Young me thought spy cars fighting each other was the coolest shit ever.
ataricynical you should watch it anyways if you want, i always like it bc i like pretty much any pixar movie but everybody has their own opinions
"The exact legacy that John Lasseter deserves" is the most brutal fucking sentence I've heard this year so far.
Once, I watched Ratatouille as a kid when I wasnt supposed to. The copy of the movie belonged to my stepdad. I snuck it to my room and watched it on my DVD player. He found out, took it out of my DVD player, turned to me and CRUSHED IT IN HIS HANDS IN FRONT OF MY EYES LIKE??????? WHAT KIND OF REACTION IS THAT??????? I guess it traumatized me enough to not watch it really for a while but man did not have to do all that.
The 'awful by Illumination standards' insult stings more when you remember that by the time Cars 2 came out Illumination only had two films (one of which was live action) and hadn't begun oversaturating the Minions yet.
It's even worse given how terrible Hop actually was. It truly IS awful by Illumination standards.
@@haydenboggs3271 Hey! I thought Hop was okay!
And by the way, all Illumination movies are just okay
@@sophiebubbles07 the original Despicable Me was actually great in my opinion, but every other Illumination movie is mediocre or just straight up bad
@@reddeath5791 agreed
Schaffrillas popping off with that “Joy is not the villain” argument is the highlight of my 2021
people really trying to find a villain character without realizing that the villain doesn't need to exist to make a story
Yeah, the actual villain of Inside Out is how stupid the fact that 2 color memories apparently always existed and yet were never once noticed because the plot needed such a fake reveal to work at all.
Joy is not a villain but she is an antagonist though. Not evil but still positioned against what the protagonist and/or the audience want/need.
@@Vanreis True, she's 100% an antagonist in the movie. Come to think of it, I like to compare her to Marlin; both are overprotective parental figures who have to learn to let their "children" confront the nastiness and sadness of the world, otherwise they'll never grow. The difference is that we KNOW why Marlin is overprotective; his wife and other unborn children were killed. It's a lot easier for an audience to see him as a protagonist because we know why he's overprotective. Joy doesn't really have that trauma. What people forget though is that Joy is an emotion. She's basically us. Everyone knows what it's like to try and see the 'bright side' of bad situations, to try and suppress our sadness, to deny ourselves of the bad things are happening in our lives. All the time, we tend to avoid unpleasant situations and conversations because it makes us feel bad. It's a human, natural reaction and Joy is basically the embodiment of that reaction. I think if people thought of her in that mindset, they would see her as more of an antagonist or a flawed protagonist than a straight-up villain
For me, there is nothing really to actively dislike in Onward, it just feels less special than the average Pixar film.
@Thomas Bequette Not really, it just didn't stick like the average Pixar movie. That's not to say I didn't enjoy it. I actively enjoyed the movie I just didn't dwell on it for days on end afterward. Still, I've seen it like 6 times now.
It's not that it's bad, it's just that there are much *much* better movies from Pixar
Yes I really liked it idk why he hates it so much.
I liked it a lot more than I expected to, and I don’t hate Chris Pratt as Barley either, but it’s not a movie that I necessarily wanna rewatch.
It's a 'meh' movie for me, it's fine, but not a movie that I'll go back to multiple times. The plot is just not my cup of tea. I don't mind the Chris Pratt voice though,,
That quote about not being good enough for something but it still being okay really hits for me! I wanted to make video games ever since i picked up a controller, but as i grew up i realized making one was alot harder than i had thought. But through the process i learned one thing i was great at! Story telling!