While admiring the restraint and demeanour of the security guys, I do, in this instance, wish we were still in the days when a bouncer would use your face to open a fire exit.
“Touch me that’s assault”, I’ll regurgitate laws protecting me but I’ll disrupt, break the laws myself and that’s okay. The double standards these “things” have are appalling.
I'm in the US. I have several questions. What mode of transportation do they use to get to all the areas they protest at? How do they heat their homes, cook their meals, heat water for bathing? Seems to me there must be some major hypocrisy going on.
@myleftfoot1201 i don't want or promote that. I saw one member of staff holding the arm of a protester as they were being led ....or ushered out. I have to ask, if the security guy did nothing, would he be at risk of losing his job.? Saving the planet is an amazing idea and we all are aware of the dire consequences. However, are the JSO protesters willing to lose people their, job and potentially their home, just to tell us what we already know?
The problem with the oil is setting it on fire releasing all the co2 into the atmosphere that is causing the planet to heat up. If we didn't burn 97,103,871 barrels of oil every day. They wouldn't be talking about stopping drilling. 35 billion barrels of oil up in smoke each year and folk still deny it will have an effect on the planet.. It's obvious the entire planet is heating up. There aren't parts of planet earth that are significantly cooler than they were 50 years ago. The problem is people think a humans lifetime is a significant amount in terms of planet earths changing climate. If we weren't burning fossil fuels thousands of times faster than carbon itself takes to grow, planet earth would take many thousands of years to change as opposed to just a few decades like we are witnessing. 32 billion barrels of oil a year up in smoke. 2 million olympic swimming pools worth of oil up in smoke. after taking between 60 and 250 million years to form...
@@alanrogerson7608Just plodding around doing nothing. I've been watching the approach taken in Germany. It is truly impressive. Police and civilians dragging the protesters off the roads.
You can't outlaw protest groups or political organisations. This isn't China. You can outlaw certain activities such as trespass and blocking roads, or incitement to commit a crime, which are already outlawed and which each individual in this organisation is guilty of.
@@epoch71 How do you define trespass then ? A business can trespass you from their property / business. Shopping centres (including the parking lot) is private property. Therefore, if you are standing / walking / running / driving on their property they can have you removed and banned from their property.
@@roadmonitoroz I was replying to @MonstaMunch101 specifically in regard to the offence of aggravated trespass. I don't need schooled in other variants of trespass (of which I'm well aware) because that wasn't the purpose of my comment or my participation in the discourse. Thanks anyway!
@@epoch71 It has nothing to do with being indoors or outside. If you are on private property and have been asked to leave and refuse to do so, it is aggravated trespass. The distinction between trespass (a civil matter) and aggravated trespass (a criminal matter) is whether you are merely on private property without permission (trespass) or have been instructed to leave a private property and have refused to do so (aggravated trespass).
@@MonstaMunch101 Yup. My bad. The outdoors clause is Section 68 of the Criminal Justice & Public Order Act (1994) which is what I was referring to. This was enacted to deal with hunt saboteurs, raves etc. I seem to remember quite a stir about it being used in the mid-90s against the Newbury Bypass protestors. But yes you’re quite right … provision for aggravated trespass indoors was enacted in the Anti-Social Behaviour Act (2003). Per my previous comments I am only referring to criminal trespass. I’ve had enough dealings with civil trespass issues to last me a lifetime!
“We’re non-violent”. Aren’t these cretins always going on about how certain words or certain behaviour are “violent”? By their own definition, what they are doing counts as violence. Personally I think that deliberately and intentionally causing a disturbance in a public place, event, or road, should be met by stiff penalties, with the affected parties being allowed to claim damages off the perpetrators.
That last sentence was comical: "We are non-violent." I would have happily replied: "Too bad for you, then, because I in fact can be quite violent when provoked." 😆
As a matter of fact by imposing their presence they just practice another type of violence. This kind of person are ready to go mad about a mild tap on the protected bottom of a kid but are ready to any form of psycholical assault to try to impose their point of view. In fact they do not have other choice as most of their theory are bs 😂
As a former shopkeeper myself, you (the public) are allowed to enter shop premises by “implied invitation “ that can be withdrawn at any time. Reasonable force can be used to eject you. The same as a public house. These coffin dodgers deserve a rougher handling than they’ve got so far.
Funny how when its private security its dealt with easily and fast, but for some reason the better funded and equiped police cant do anything... weird...
It's much easier to remove unwanted people from a private building than a public place/road....... oh, that and the Police are a bunch of simpering halfwits who struggle to tie their own shoelaces, let alone uphold the law. They're usually too busy affixing the latest rainbow flag paraphernalia to their stab vests in support of the most recently vocal gender minority.........
That's because this so-called protest is being staged. I'm going to refer to it as 'reverse propaganda' so you might understand. It's classic Goebbels - unattractive protesters being fought off by the 'brave' and strong public. Big Oil money is funding this, as well as paying to have these videos moved to the top of the RUclips queue.
They are, it's a government (sponsored) message to make everyone think that everyone else believes the climate change myth in order to justify new green/carbon taxes the EU have planned for us. That's why JSO never protest to the Government. It's a public-brainwashing exercise.
It's unbelievable how a couple of years ago, people were arrested by police for drinking a cup of coffee in a park during lockdown, yet standing in the middle of the road blocking traffic get's no response from police.
he's saying they're not tresspassing...they are on private property in a retail store. If the management wish to eject you with reasonable force they can. They should read up on the law
There was a time that any shop owner or keeper had the right to refuse entry to their shop. What's gone wrong. The lack of police intervention is creating domestic terrorism. Forcing your will on another person who is not interfering with anybody just going about their business is terrorism.
Nice to see rubbish being cleared from the store. In England each year there are about 800 deaths associated with the heat but over 60,000 associated with the cold. In England global warming will save lives.
These people have more than the average joe, and instead of being quietly humble, they try and make life worse for those that have less. Quite sickening when you think about it.
Absolutely. If it was my store, I would first have my "nabbers" grab all of the cell phones being used to take video, put them on the floor, and stomp them into dust. THEN the pepper spray would come out, and other stuff as well. These "hostile protestors" are the same people who block ambulances when people in critical condition are being denied life-saving healthcare. Nothing non-violent about them.
You mean bored/boring middle-class wasters? Didn't do that at Glastonbury though!!even though it was Whiter than a Royal balcony 🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅 Security should have put the duster on them 😎👍
They are on private property and have been told to leave. Therefore they have no implied right to be there. If they don't leave then remove them by force.
If anything they are not nonsensical, they are highlighting a real problem , which is a huge problem humanity is facing. I can understand that minor annoyance and disruptions to daily routines trigger you, and that their tactics are up for debate , but not the cause.
@@mikiafu Absolutely. But their antics cause the problem to be lost over the method they use. They are oblivious to their own hypocrisy, and that's the real dilemma here.
@@mcarp555 Yes, that might be true to an extent, but also I think it's been blown out of proportions. I never met anyone who would come across them in London, it's not like they are everywhere.
@@mikiafu Nonetheless, I can't think of anything they've done that hasn't just annoyed people. Whether it's slow-walking in the road, disrupting televised Snooker or trying to deface historic works of art, it only draws attention away from what they are protesting about.
@@mcarp555 yes but we need to put these action in a context .as said most people are not being impacted. I live in London know a lot of people who commute daily and none of them was ever incoveniced by them. It's not like all roads all being blocked. Rather a 0,1% percent are temporarily annyoed, but most of us get the message, about a potential calamity that will affect all of us, across. It's the sun etc that are trying to portray these people as the worst criminals.
These guys don’t hv jobs they are funded by someone to do this. It’s very easy to find out who funds them. But Govt is busy arresting people over FB posts.
@@bonysminiatures3123 And what relevance does that have? What matters to us is that they're blocking the roads and causing a public nuisance. Why would we care who's funding them?
Hypocrisy knows no bounds. Shouldn't they be running around naked? Oil and other minerals are used to make their shoes and clothes. Shouldn't they walk everywhere? Because even to make a bicycle is used oil and other minerals. Why hasn't any journalist yet shown their hypocrisy?
I'am impressed with their security team. They are allowed to use a certain amount of force to remove these people from private property. Well done. Trouble is that these nut jobs will move on to the next store.
I would have thought JSO would stay away from their favourite stores like Selfridge, M+S, Waitrose and any of the charity shops that sell jumpers, sandals and corduroy trousers.
I have noticed just recently that these people are being directed in what they do on the road there are also guy's with camera's protecting them from anyone who attempts to remove them or forcibly drive through them, I wonder if some of these protesters are being paid to do what they do?
They're extremely well funded, mainly by the "climate emergency fund" which receives donations from some very high profile and wealthy supporters. According to the website the CEF dispersed over $5.1m funding climate activism last year. 🙄
the tall guy hold the cam and recording is apparently a "centurion" - responsible for the field operative of the protest & recording - he won't get his hand dirty by directly holding a sign himself, but he certainly is the one schemed for this protest; those poor ones in orange shirts are just newly joined members being used as "cannon fodder" to attract police/guard attention.
The ones with the camera is the co-ordinator they need to start arresting these and confiscating their camera equipment as evidence of terrorist activity so they might get it back in a few years if extremely lucky. Have them marked as the organiser so senten3cing will b3 much greater than for the brand dead retard terrorists with yellow bibs. We need to sieze this equipment if they come by vehicle which is most likely after all it is do as we say not as we do sieze the vehicles slap them with fines that after the first time are easily in the thousands then tens of thousands if the rich scum want to fund them fine let them h3lp pay off the national debt with their ill-gotten money.
Can you imagine ever employing one of these people should they ever decide to work for a living? If they indicate any support for just stop oil how could you trust them as employees? Some small issue could cause offence, trigger them and start them off on some unreasonable crusade causing huge disruption. You could try to reason but reason isn’t effective, the only thing that matters is the current obsession. I worry about the state of mind of people who could do this I really do. It’s impossible to justify.
Why do they always have that slow, shuffling zombie walk. I’ve seen videos where people drag them off the street, and they just mindlessly shamble back to their spot.
It is regrettable that these very professional and effective security people in Selfridges could not be employed to similarly remove the politicians behind this criminal behaviour from the houses of parliament .
At least in a privately owned shop/business, they can be asked to leave and if they don't they are then trespassing (sadly a civil matter, not criminal!).
Agreed that security staff can use reasonable force to evict "shoppers" from the premises. They also have the right to get the police involved if they have reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been, or is likely to be, committed. There is also the little-known procedure, known as Citizens' Arrest, which anybody can carry out. Also, trespass becomes a criminal offence when the trespassers damage the land on which they are trespassing, or cause a nuisance to the landowners.
I think every citizen should file a restraining order of sorts from this organization. This way, they cannot get close to the citizens. Let alone block there right of way
Removed firmly and efficiently from a shop which is entered by the public with tacit permission from the proprietors subject to their behaviour whilst on the premises.
What was the purpose of people going into Selfridges, or any store for that matter, if they were not going to buy anything, and had no intention to do so?
"If you touch me, that's assault". Then they're sbout to commit various assaults. Besides, I don't know for certain but I'm pretty sure removing someone from private property who is a criminal trespasser overrides the "unwanted touching is assault" clause.
"im here because of my sons future" thats admirable but were here to remove you because your on private property trying to cause a disturbance so dont see why you think thats a valid reason to let me let you stay
"we are not violent"perhaps those morons should gain an understanding of violence. Those idiots physically place themselves in positions that cause damage to others. That is violence.
While admiring the restraint and demeanour of the security guys, I do, in this instance, wish we were still in the days when a bouncer would use your face to open a fire exit.
😂😂😂
I miss those days ❤❤😂😂😂, although I was often on the wrong end of a few bouncers 😂😂😂
I remember those days ...😂😮
Yep, you're proper hard you aren't you.
@@jimjones-bk2is says the girl behind a screen
“Touch me that’s assault”, I’ll regurgitate laws protecting me but I’ll disrupt, break the laws myself and that’s okay. The double standards these “things” have are appalling.
“things “ 👌🏼
Mindless drones.
Mate you’re lucky he’s only touching.
It’s not assault anyway. Once they’ve been asked to leave, trespassers can be removed with minimum force.
they did get touched and found out it wasn't assault
I'm in the US. I have several questions. What mode of transportation do they use to get to all the areas they protest at? How do they heat their homes, cook their meals, heat water for bathing?
Seems to me there must be some major hypocrisy going on.
Plenty of hypocrisy. They only hate it when it suits them, though. If we really did "just stop oil," the world would be in crisis.
Hi Viz vests , rubber soled shoes?trainers clothing etc. etc....... They would all have to be naked to take them seriously tbh!
I think these mobs they sleep walk 😂 they are absolutely thick in the head
Exactly!
You got it complete idiots
Selfridges' security doing a better job than the police
I was about to ask if Sefridges security have more power than the police 🚔
@myleftfoot1201 i don't want or promote that. I saw one member of staff holding the arm of a protester as they were being led ....or ushered out.
I have to ask, if the security guy did nothing, would he be at risk of losing his job.?
Saving the planet is an amazing idea and we all are aware of the dire consequences. However, are the JSO protesters willing to lose people their, job and potentially their home, just to tell us what we already know?
@@HoofHearted314 They had no plans to leave the property. At this point, you can use reasonable force to remove them.
@@HoofHearted314 They were trespassers FFS!
Because they are inside private property and when they refuse to leave, it's trespassing. On a public street, however, the police have limited powers.
They shout "we are non violent" whilst causing immense anger in others.....their abuse of other people's rights is emotional violence.
That's a private establishment so they cannot do whatever they want and clearly the private security is much more efficient than the public one
get the old fashioned security to move them like they used to have in clubs and pubs they never used to muck around bloody do gooders
@@TrevorWheeler-jn9kb A couple of LENNY McLEAN types would clear up the fuss !
Calling for assault when the security is not even doing anything. It makes the word "assault" invalid for those people who really are assaulted.
The shop is private property, security employed to throw out unwanted visiters, so I hope they dragged him out the door 🤣🤣🤣
so many words are losing their meanings these days, the world is getting worse
it's very American, to look at an American wrongly is assault
@@strangeoldman1876 agree to this. I don't know why society is on the decline. Common decency is not common anymore.
@@chadstaryshouldn't be correct tho change the laws or something because touching someone isnt assault
“Touch me, that’s assault”. What a horrible piece of 💩 threatening a decent man trying to make a living.
How do you know he's a decent man trying to make a living?
@@jimjones-bk2is a pathetic attempt at diverting, Jim 🤡
@@jimjones-bk2isbecause he doesn't look like a dismissed teacher that got found with dodgy text messages vs a security guard wearing a suit.
@@interestedobserver587 never judge a book by its cover.
@@jimjones-bk2is When the dismissed teacher makes false accusations then he has shown the deficiency in his character and can be judged.
Now they think they can disrupt PRIVATE businesses. 🤦♂ Whoever is in charge of this organization needs to be brought up on charges.
These nutballs are being paid to do this. Follow the money. I wonder how you would find out about the payer?
Think the police should take notes that this is how it's should be done ,very professional and calmly done
*‘JUST STOP OIL’ if you don’t want :*
*HOMES* - _Insulation, roofing, guttering, flooring, furniture, appliances, pillows, curtains, rugs, paint, dishes, cups, non-stick pans, detergent, etc …_
CLOTHING - _Shoes, purses, acrylic, rayon, vegan leather, polyester, nylon, spandex, etc …_
MEDICAL _Hearing aids, IV Bags, aspirin, antihistamines, artificial limbs, dentures, syringes, heart valves, etc …_
PERSONAL CARE - _Perfume/Aftershave, hair dye, cosmetics, hand lotions, toothpaste, soap, shaving cream, deodorant, combs, shampoo, eyeglasses, contact lenses, etc …_
ELECTRONICS - _Smartphones, computers, cameras, television, etc …_
SPORTS - _Basketballs, golfballs, backpacks, surfboards, skis, tennis rackets, fishing rods, etc …_
Reason and facts seem to be lost on them
The problem with the oil is setting it on fire releasing all the co2 into the atmosphere that is causing the planet to heat up.
If we didn't burn 97,103,871 barrels of oil every day. They wouldn't be talking about stopping drilling.
35 billion barrels of oil up in smoke each year and folk still deny it will have an effect on the planet..
It's obvious the entire planet is heating up. There aren't parts of planet earth that are significantly cooler than they were 50 years ago.
The problem is people think a humans lifetime is a significant amount in terms of planet earths changing climate.
If we weren't burning fossil fuels thousands of times faster than carbon itself takes to grow, planet earth would take many thousands of years to change as opposed to just a few decades like we are witnessing.
32 billion barrels of oil a year up in smoke.
2 million olympic swimming pools worth of oil up in smoke.
after taking between 60 and 250 million years to form...
Brilliant
⬆️ This! 👏
Yep it's used for just about everything in everyday living items...
Well done that security team. Very professionally handled.
They need a kick in the a ss
And where is the useless well paid plods.
@@alanrogerson7608Just plodding around doing nothing. I've been watching the approach taken in Germany. It is truly impressive. Police and civilians dragging the protesters off the roads.
@@ts757arse Hahahah, agreed! Your comment is GOLD!
Their security team must cost a fortune in salaries and benefits.
Well done to the Security in Selfridges for removing these scum from the premises, thank goodness that Selfridges wasn’t relying on the local Police 🙈
Stop press africa has been a hot country for a million years
THEY ARE IN FACT far left SCUM
@@johnthompson7105Not as hot as it is now.
Calling people you don’t agree with ‘scum’ says more about you than them.
@@viv8117 oh year over 100 million people murdered by comunism in the 20th century communist SCUM
The security team handled them with such care and politeness - and frankly they don't bloody deserve it, they're a f***ing nuisance!
"Im here because im terrified for my sons future" im terrified for him right now if youre his father.
Ban them from everywhere, in fact outlaw JSO and ever other protest group that disrupts
hard working people.
some politician should just have the ballz to lable them as the terrorist organistaion that they are!
You can't outlaw protest groups or political organisations. This isn't China.
You can outlaw certain activities such as trespass and blocking roads, or incitement to commit a crime, which are already outlawed and which each individual in this organisation is guilty of.
@@EzioAuditoreDaFirenze99 Terrorist organisations can be proscribed.
A certain Austrian painter would have liked you.
@@romanpolanski4928 They're not a terrorist organisation. There's been no acts of terror or hate on their part.
The law allows reasonable force against people committing aggravated trespass.
Unfortunately, I don't think this constitutes aggravated trespass as it's indoors. Pretty sure that offence only applies if it's outside.
@@epoch71 How do you define trespass then ? A business can trespass you from their property / business. Shopping centres (including the parking lot) is private property. Therefore, if you are standing / walking / running / driving on their property they can have you removed and banned from their property.
@@roadmonitoroz I was replying to @MonstaMunch101 specifically in regard to the offence of aggravated trespass. I don't need schooled in other variants of trespass (of which I'm well aware) because that wasn't the purpose of my comment or my participation in the discourse. Thanks anyway!
@@epoch71 It has nothing to do with being indoors or outside. If you are on private property and have been asked to leave and refuse to do so, it is aggravated trespass. The distinction between trespass (a civil matter) and aggravated trespass (a criminal matter) is whether you are merely on private property without permission (trespass) or have been instructed to leave a private property and have refused to do so (aggravated trespass).
@@MonstaMunch101 Yup. My bad. The outdoors clause is Section 68 of the Criminal Justice & Public Order Act (1994) which is what I was referring to. This was enacted to deal with hunt saboteurs, raves etc. I seem to remember quite a stir about it being used in the mid-90s against the Newbury Bypass protestors. But yes you’re quite right … provision for aggravated trespass indoors was enacted in the Anti-Social Behaviour Act (2003). Per my previous comments I am only referring to criminal trespass. I’ve had enough dealings with civil trespass issues to last me a lifetime!
Just because you're non violent it doesn't give you extra powers.
especially while fiming everything trying to be the victims
“We’re non-violent”. Aren’t these cretins always going on about how certain words or certain behaviour are “violent”? By their own definition, what they are doing counts as violence.
Personally I think that deliberately and intentionally causing a disturbance in a public place, event, or road, should be met by stiff penalties, with the affected parties being allowed to claim damages off the perpetrators.
They're stupor heroes.
It was dale vince money power
it isn't non violent when property is damaged ...
That last sentence was comical: "We are non-violent." I would have happily replied: "Too bad for you, then, because I in fact can be quite violent when provoked." 😆
As a matter of fact by imposing their presence they just practice another type of violence. This kind of person are ready to go mad about a mild tap on the protected bottom of a kid but are ready to any form of psycholical assault to try to impose their point of view. In fact they do not have other choice as most of their theory are bs 😂
If jso have driving licences they won’t mind them being taken away as punishment
As a former shopkeeper myself, you (the public) are allowed to enter shop premises by “implied invitation “ that can be withdrawn at any time. Reasonable force can be used to eject you. The same as a public house. These coffin dodgers deserve a rougher handling than they’ve got so far.
Thanks for the clarification. :). Never really thought about it :)
So JSO were useful for something after all hehe
Yes. "Right of admission reserved!"
And that trouble maker trying to use his phone to film them, many premises do NOT allow photography.
Coffin Dodgers 😂
@@MargaretAnderson-ti1sw okay? But you only want the law applies to you? You can take their phone because you don't allow photography.
Funny how when its private security its dealt with easily and fast, but for some reason the better funded and equiped police cant do anything... weird...
It's much easier to remove unwanted people from a private building than a public place/road....... oh, that and the Police are a bunch of simpering halfwits who struggle to tie their own shoelaces, let alone uphold the law. They're usually too busy affixing the latest rainbow flag paraphernalia to their stab vests in support of the most recently vocal gender minority.........
That's because this so-called protest is being staged. I'm going to refer to it as 'reverse propaganda' so you might understand. It's classic Goebbels - unattractive protesters being fought off by the 'brave' and strong public. Big Oil money is funding this, as well as paying to have these videos moved to the top of the RUclips queue.
They do at home, trust me. 😳🤕😢
Remember that the next police want a pay rise.
World of difference between private and public security.
They are not even spreading message , so far only thing they have done is annoying people
They are, it's a government (sponsored) message to make everyone think that everyone else believes the climate change myth in order to justify new green/carbon taxes the EU have planned for us. That's why JSO never protest to the Government. It's a public-brainwashing exercise.
I have actually become more of a climate skeptic, thanks to them.
@@anthtansome people so gullible
Imagine you're an ambulance driver rushing the dying patient to the hospital and you see these idiots blocking the highway...
Imagine if youre the patient!!!! I think if physically possible the patient would wanna get out and clear the path at all costs!!!!
@@MoveoverAndbark absolutely.
Drempels
It's unbelievable how a couple of years ago, people were arrested by police for drinking a cup of coffee in a park during lockdown, yet standing in the middle of the road blocking traffic get's no response from police.
Not the first time Selfridges have had to deal with nonsense. Some of the best the security industry has to offer, well handled.
I hope the security guards are ok after that harrowing experience of having to touch the unwashed mob?
probably caught fleas
Take a closer look at that 'mob'
@@jimjones-bk2isthey look like a bunch of dirty hippies. The only clean looking guy was the guy with the camera.
@@jimjones-bk2ispensioners and people that should be on a mental home.
@@stewartsteinecke7301 exactly. Hardly a threatening mob, are they.
"I'm petrified for my son's future"....... so am I for him with a father figure like that!
they should worry about knife crime if they really are worried about kids future
@@ramsey633 But knife crime doesn't affect the children of middle class white people?
Haha they were the first words that came into my head.
LOL EXACTLY WHAT I WAS THINKING
I seriously doubt that loser has procreated.
he's saying they're not tresspassing...they are on private property in a retail store. If the management wish to eject you with reasonable force they can. They should read up on the law
Laws only apply to "other people"
Well done Selfridges security for removing these numpties very professionally and with as little fuss as possible.
Who the hell do they think they are, going into shops and making a nuisance of themselves. Nice work by the security guards, well done guys.😊😊😊
I'd love Joe public to blockade their drives ,houses ,and just harass them,as not allowed to bash them.
I was just thinking the same thing. It's time to give these idiots a taste of their own medicine. Make their lives a living hell.
Perfectly valid to remove a trespasser having asked them to leave first. Not assault at all. Reasonable force.
They have a weak case, but they are not prepared to listen to other people
They are dangerous
Way more polite than I would have been to those irksome lying self-obsessed criminals
Agree
I would be tempted to give a VIGOROUS bum's rush to those trespassers
@@philherrick7319For these occasions, judges need to have a third verdict between guilty and not guilty: had it comin’
And what would you do, ,mr. honourable daily follower ?
They’ve done whatever they wanted for their whole life but decided to tell everyone else how to live. YOU’RE PART OF THE CAUSE
Who are paying these people?
well when the WEF decides to depopulate lets hope its this lot first 😏
Trespassers can be removed using necessary force.
End of.
These people are ridiculous ,well dine security
There was a time that any shop owner or keeper had the right to refuse entry to their shop. What's gone wrong. The lack of police intervention is creating domestic terrorism. Forcing your will on another person who is not interfering with anybody just going about their business is terrorism.
Selgridges security seem fair and professional to me.
The crying JSO grifter doesn't want to be assaulted. All hard working people want to throw him over the side of the escalater.
This idiocy has to stop
You can't change an idiot , unless they spend some serious jail time to adjust their attitudes .
Correct. Further extraction of fossil fuels needs to end.
There's always going to be idiots roaming the world.
Nice to see rubbish being cleared from the store. In England each year there are about 800 deaths associated with the heat but over 60,000 associated with the cold. In England global warming will save lives.
These people have more than the average joe, and instead of being quietly humble, they try and make life worse for those that have less. Quite sickening when you think about it.
These hostile protesters looked extremely threatening to me, I suggest the liberal use of pepper spray would have been entirely justified 😉
I suggest transporting them to an island in the middle of nowhere, where they can protest in peace.
Absolutely. If it was my store, I would first have my "nabbers" grab all of the cell phones being used to take video, put them on the floor, and stomp them into dust. THEN the pepper spray would come out, and other stuff as well. These "hostile protestors" are the same people who block ambulances when people in critical condition are being denied life-saving healthcare. Nothing non-violent about them.
Poke the bearded clown in the eye and the camera up his jaxci
You mean bored/boring middle-class wasters?
Didn't do that at Glastonbury though!!even though it was Whiter than a Royal balcony
🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅
Security should have put the duster on them
😎👍
Bored/boring middle class wasters should have been at Wimbledon Cheering for neo-nazi Ukraine
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
They are complete and utter hypocrites!!!
You can't protest on private property. They should know that.
In my country, filming is prohibited in private property, you need the owners consent. I doubt that is different in the UK.
Why not?
@@jimjones-bk2is well I have oil central heating and i’d be mighty p’d off if they tried protesting in my living room 😅
@@1ninjatiger 😂
@@jimjones-bk2isIt’s trespass.
Kudos to the security team, who handled the matter professionally and, to the best of their ability, with discretion.
They are on private property and have been told to leave. Therefore they have no implied right to be there. If they don't leave then remove them by force.
"We are non-violent! We are non-violent!" No, you're nonsensical.
If anything they are not nonsensical, they are highlighting a real problem , which is a huge problem humanity is facing. I can understand that minor annoyance and disruptions to daily routines trigger you, and that their tactics are up for debate , but not the cause.
@@mikiafu Absolutely. But their antics cause the problem to be lost over the method they use. They are oblivious to their own hypocrisy, and that's the real dilemma here.
@@mcarp555 Yes, that might be true to an extent, but also I think it's been blown out of proportions. I never met anyone who would come across them in London, it's not like they are everywhere.
@@mikiafu Nonetheless, I can't think of anything they've done that hasn't just annoyed people. Whether it's slow-walking in the road, disrupting televised Snooker or trying to deface historic works of art, it only draws attention away from what they are protesting about.
@@mcarp555 yes but we need to put these action in a context .as said most people are not being impacted. I live in London know a lot of people who commute daily and none of them was ever incoveniced by them. It's not like all roads all being blocked. Rather a 0,1% percent are temporarily annyoed, but most of us get the message, about a potential calamity that will affect all of us, across. It's the sun etc that are trying to portray these people as the worst criminals.
These guys don’t hv jobs they are funded by someone to do this. It’s very easy to find out who funds them. But Govt is busy arresting people over FB posts.
@@Errantwarrior ROFL, that's about 3 steps below "a bloke in the pub told me".
they are funded by dale vince
@@bonysminiatures3123 Did you have a point, or is it just your turn to say something stupid?
@@TheIrvy they are funded by dale vince owner of forest green rovers you are a few steps behind let you catch up ( if that is possible )
@@bonysminiatures3123 And what relevance does that have? What matters to us is that they're blocking the roads and causing a public nuisance. Why would we care who's funding them?
I recognise the camera man. He was the protester who climbed the QE2 bridge at Dartford.
He was seething with hate and anger, very dangerous person
I'd still slap him one. Obnoxious little 💩
"We are non-violent!"
Bro, you're giving people reason to be violent.
Hypocrisy knows no bounds. Shouldn't they be running around naked? Oil and other minerals are used to make their shoes and clothes. Shouldn't they walk everywhere? Because even to make a bicycle is used oil and other minerals.
Why hasn't any journalist yet shown their hypocrisy?
The vests they wear are made using fossil fuels and are transported to them using fossil fuels
I just made that point above, then read you had beat me to it. Exactly.
I recognise one of them as being on the bridge at Dartford.
He looks very angry and belligerent
Why doesn't someone exact real punishment on these idiots
by age these are people who have enjoyed the benefit of coal and oil most of their comfortable lives.
I'am impressed with their security team. They are allowed to use a certain amount of force to remove these people from private property.
Well done. Trouble is that these nut jobs will move on to the next store.
I JUST LOVE OIL
Dump all the Just Stop Oil protesters into river thames or lock em up all in prison for life -CLOWNS 🤡
I would have thought JSO would stay away from their favourite stores like Selfridge, M+S, Waitrose and any of the charity shops that sell jumpers, sandals and corduroy trousers.
🤦♂️🤣🤣
Lol! 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
I have noticed just recently that these people are being directed in what they do on the road there are also guy's with camera's protecting them from anyone who attempts to remove them or forcibly drive through them, I wonder if some of these protesters are being paid to do what they do?
They're extremely well funded, mainly by the "climate emergency fund" which receives donations from some very high profile and wealthy supporters. According to the website the CEF dispersed over $5.1m funding climate activism last year. 🙄
@@sidean26 I wonder how many of the high profile and wealthy supporters use private jets.
If I was a bystander for that I'd be applauding so hard I'd have to ice my hands afterward.
At least they were not stopping people from driving.
Very professional security team. Firm but respectful.
That was about as "dramatic" as that time i poured a glass of juice and spilled a drop on my kitchen table.
title didn't live up to the video
😆🤣😂
😂😂😂
They should be stripped of any garment or footwear that used petrochemicals in it's manufacture.
the tall guy hold the cam and recording is apparently a "centurion" - responsible for the field operative of the protest & recording - he won't get his hand dirty by directly holding a sign himself, but he certainly is the one schemed for this protest; those poor ones in orange shirts are just newly joined members being used as "cannon fodder" to attract police/guard attention.
The ones with the camera is the co-ordinator they need to start arresting these and confiscating their camera equipment as evidence of terrorist activity so they might get it back in a few years if extremely lucky.
Have them marked as the organiser so senten3cing will b3 much greater than for the brand dead retard terrorists with yellow bibs.
We need to sieze this equipment if they come by vehicle which is most likely after all it is do as we say not as we do sieze the vehicles slap them with fines that after the first time are easily in the thousands then tens of thousands if the rich scum want to fund them fine let them h3lp pay off the national debt with their ill-gotten money.
Poor cannon fodder? What sort of results do those fools expect? They all look addled and confused like Joe Biden.
@@tomsherwood4650 Veganism is bad for the brain.
He look the NUTTIEST is that why he's in charge 😂😂😂😂😂
You right, and he is the only one getting paid, all other are just useful idiots.
Each and every one being PAID £100 a day and not declaring to the INLAND REVENUE breaking the law
Touch me that's assault, uninvited on premises that's trespass
Where do they find the protesters - at the nursing homes ? How much do they pay the clowns. Kudos to the security team .
You could see the security guards would love to have dragged them out feet first.
Shame they kept their cool.
Some of them have dangerous personalities and are reckless as to the consequences
Can you imagine ever employing one of these people should they ever decide to work for a living? If they indicate any support for just stop oil how could you trust them as employees? Some small issue could cause offence, trigger them and start them off on some unreasonable crusade causing huge disruption. You could try to reason but reason isn’t effective, the only thing that matters is the current obsession.
I worry about the state of mind of people who could do this I really do. It’s impossible to justify.
These folk all look quite retired to me. They've all got very grey hair.
And people have been trying reason for a very long time.
Just give them a month's extra pay and terminate their employment.
Selfridges is not used to the great unwashed on their premises! Glad they were thrown out.
And how did they actually get to Selfridges by teleportation or did they use flying Unicorns?
They are dangerous and aggressive now and need to be stopped immediately
They need to have a hobby and a proper job.
Can we retire the police force and employ security guards
They may not be violent but the rest of us are fed up with them and will turn angry.
Funny that they think preventing people from living their lives isn’t violence! 😮
I think it is only a matter of time before someone snaps and gives them a hiding...Security staff acted perfectly here
"we are none violent" says the most passive aggresive group of people ever!!!
Why do they always have that slow, shuffling zombie walk. I’ve seen videos where people drag them off the street, and they just mindlessly shamble back to their spot.
The security guards are doing the rigth thing. They dont need to talk to these nuisance activists
It is regrettable that these very professional and effective security people in Selfridges could not be employed to similarly remove the politicians behind this criminal behaviour from the houses of parliament .
Excellent idea, how those security people can be so polite in those circumstances is mind boggling .
@@veronicaevans8993That's because they didn't get rid of the cameras filming them.
Well-programmed zombies.
Thats for sure they certainly are mentally programmed otherwise they would be responding differently.
At least in a privately owned shop/business, they can be asked to leave and if they don't they are then trespassing (sadly a civil matter, not criminal!).
Yup, they can also use reasonable force to evict them too.
In the U.S., at least, civil trespass can become criminal trespass.
Agreed that security staff can use reasonable force to evict "shoppers" from the premises. They also have the right to get the police involved if they have reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been, or is likely to be, committed. There is also the little-known procedure, known as Citizens' Arrest, which anybody can carry out. Also, trespass becomes a criminal offence when the trespassers damage the land on which they are trespassing, or cause a nuisance to the landowners.
Not if they don't leave then it becomes aggravated trespass which is criminal.
The criminality is established during the civil proceedings
It's just that the police aren't prosecuting them in the courts
It’s incredible how many non-violent types forget to be non-belligerent or non-antagonistic.
I think every citizen should file a restraining order of sorts from this organization. This way, they cannot get close to the citizens. Let alone block there right of way
Removed firmly and efficiently from a shop which is entered by the public with tacit permission from the
proprietors subject to their behaviour whilst on the premises.
Just a joke....they do what they do and get largely ignored!
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence
Well done security
All shops have the right of admission reserved. Which means if they do require your presence they can have removed from their property
What was the purpose of people going into Selfridges, or any store for that matter, if they were not going to buy anything, and had no intention to do so?
"If you touch me, that's assault".
Then they're sbout to commit various assaults. Besides, I don't know for certain but I'm pretty sure removing someone from private property who is a criminal trespasser overrides the "unwanted touching is assault" clause.
"im here because of my sons future" thats admirable but were here to remove you because your on private property trying to cause a disturbance so dont see why you think thats a valid reason to let me let you stay
Well done boys ,don't let them back in 💪
Don't these people have jobs or are they all on benefits?
"we are not violent"perhaps those morons should gain an understanding of violence. Those idiots physically place themselves in positions that cause damage to others. That is violence.