This video is an informative video and shows all the facts around the WCC 2024. Title and thumbnail should enhance our viewers to speak their opinion about the match between Gukesh and Ding Liren. There have been a lot of videos on the internet (videos about magnus, kasparov, hikaru and so many more critizing BOTH Ding and Gukesh). We say Gukesh 100% deserved his title he did everything fair and square! We hope you enjoy watching the video. Let us know your opinion in the comments.
CHESS IS GAME OF PATIENCE. IT IS YOUR SELF DEFEND YOURSELF. WAIT TO OPPONENT TO MAKE WRONG MOVES. DING MADE WRONG MOVES GUKESH FINDS IT AND WINS IT. SIMPLE...
Gukesh won the candidates still people saying nepo caruana were better who played in the same tournament .. 😂 . Chill guys dont watch such videos anymore . Celebrate gukesh . He is the undisputed world champion and he fully deserves to be there . If ding makes a one move blunder wont gukesh capitakise to win . Maybe nepo caruana lost the candidates on purpose as well 😢 . What nonsense . Become mature guys Gukesh rocked west world shocked 😂😂😂 .
yeah. he is the lucky one. defying all odds and winning the candidates, then ding blundering at the pivotal moment. this will definitely go down in history
i thought someone can win a chess game when blunder occurs, i think i was wrong. Can you tell me what are the other odd's that someone can win a chess game without any blunder?
@@studentscouncil659 apparently a perfect game by computers will always lead to a draw. But those computers have an elo of like 3600. I would say Game 6 of the world championship between magnus and ian nepomniatschi would be a good example of someone winning a game without their opponent blundering.
@@shironeko3107 he is 18 and very far off from actually reaching his true elo. Magnus at 18 was rated lower than Gukesh. If everyone is better than him then why did they not win candidates ? Caruana is better than gukesh? Cool, win candidates and then beat him
@@kartikeyatiwari2502 it's not about age it's about the title and the title is for the best player not the youngest. Even though he won the current best player didn't even attend the championship
You may as very well be right, but its a piss poor take because you simply have no weight here, as you're not quoting anyone and are just ranting your own opinions. Unless you're a grandmaster, none of us care about your opinion as an individual.
I can't understand one thing, why the world, few nations and fellow few GMs and few former GMs are raged with such an envy over his victory 💔💔 I think and deeply believe the main cause is India not only holds the "world championship" but also the "world's youngest champion"🏆 ever!! He came step by step, cleared and came no. 1 in candidates thereby qualified for world championship challenger. After a very hard tough competition he managed to win after a great struggle. Despite of many odds both himself and his family faced. At last he made it. Many doubt of Ding blunder. But, "To err is human" everyone makes mistake. No matter he is GM or super GM. Just mere humans at the base!! Ding is a very strong solid player. Please appreciate Gukesh he is just a budding super GM. Above all he is a super gentleman I have ever seen. Who truly deserved to be the world champion. I deeply believe in. ❤ Gukesh ❤
Some mistakes, which are necessary for a decisive result, but most games were fighting chess. I agree with you guys. (In actual reality, the worst championship of the last quarter-century was Kasparov-Kramnik, since Shirov won the Candidates final and Kasparov, who was the head of the federation AND the world champion (conflict of interest anyone?) replaced Shirov with Kramnik by fiat. Kramnik went on to beat Kasparov, mostly by boring him to death.) So, for the first time ever, you had a World Champion who hadn't earned the right to play the match in the first place. This is HIGHLY ironic, because if you've ever read anything by Kasparov, he's *convinced* that there was a huge conspiracy to replace him as Karpov's opponent in 1984: "I can't prove it, but I know it!". Turns out, he just thinks that because that's what HE would do. I don't mean to cast shade on Kasparov -- he's an excellent writer and teacher, EXCEPT when talking about himself. In _My Great Predecessors,_ I was happily surprised by how fair and insightful he was about Karpov, who's my favorite player, and sort of a sleeper "best of all time".
true it was fighting chess and surely very interesting to watch! Also, very interesting what you said (especially since Kasparov complains a lot about FIDE tournaments). This will be something we will look into! ty! :)
@@2ChessNoobs NP: I got trolled by the title into thinking your question was a statement (a few other commenters are having that problem), so apologies if you read my extremely snarky first draft :/
Assume for a second that, in football, an underdog like Sweden just won the World Cup Would they be called the best out there? No. If situations had not been favorable to them, would they have become world champions in football? Possibly No. But did they become world champions? Yes. Titles in each sport are discussed like this and often the most deserving or strongest is not the world champion. To be the world champion, you have to play the cards right and hope conditions are favorable. Kudos to Gukesh for doing everything right enough to be world champion. Who participated and who didn’t is irrelevant now. It’s what it is. And he’s the youngest world champion
@@VichitraChitta01 bruh I said well deserved for a reason also chess isnot football here the WCC is always the best player except two cases one during Bobby Fisher's Era and Now because of Magnus so being WCC is like being no 2 I mean Gukesh isn't even the Highest rated player from his country so it's just unjustified all this Magnus effect has changed Chess History the WCC is just a Top10 Player of the world Yes Gukesh created history and he did it in an spectacular fashion and I am rooting for him to bring a new era of Chess Indeed I hope he quickly becomes the Strongest in terms of title and strenght so that chess history get improved
World champion used to mean something before.. It used to mean that best chess player in the world.. Now it just means someone who got lucky and played when best player got too bored and current wc is mentally ill
the first part is the reason why so many GMs critizised it. But gukesh didnt get lucky... i dont think you win the candidates by being lucky so he definetly had his fair share
If that's the case what's the point of organising the championship? Who knows there may be better chess player than Magnus in the world who is not interested in competing. Does that make Magnus's titles less deserving?
@@the3rdEye2187 no, Ding and now Gukesh 100% deserved the title! No doubt about that. There is just a couple GMs that dont like the format of the championship. Doesnt mean titles are less deserving in our opinion :)
@2ChessNoobs I agree. Is he the best chess player right now? I don't think so. However those questioning whether he 'DESERVE' the World Champion title or not is a bit condescending. He didn't reach the final stage by LUCK or CHANCE only.
@2ChessNoobs I agree. Is he the best chess player right now? I don't think so. However those questioning whether he 'DESERVE' the World Champion title or not is a bit condescending. He didn't reach the final stage by LUCK or CHANCE only.
This video is an informative video and shows all the facts around the WCC 2024. Title and thumbnail should enhance our viewers to speak their opinion about the match between Gukesh and Ding Liren. There have been a lot of videos on the internet (videos about magnus, kasparov, hikaru and so many more critizing BOTH Ding and Gukesh). We say Gukesh 100% deserved his title he did everything fair and square!
We hope you enjoy watching the video. Let us know your opinion in the comments.
There is some sense of jealousy 😢
From hikaru pr do you mean in general?
CHESS IS GAME OF PATIENCE. IT IS YOUR SELF DEFEND YOURSELF. WAIT TO OPPONENT TO MAKE WRONG MOVES. DING MADE WRONG MOVES GUKESH FINDS IT AND WINS IT. SIMPLE...
Gukesh won the candidates still people saying nepo caruana were better who played in the same tournament .. 😂 . Chill guys dont watch such videos anymore . Celebrate gukesh . He is the undisputed world champion and he fully deserves to be there . If ding makes a one move blunder wont gukesh capitakise to win . Maybe nepo caruana lost the candidates on purpose as well 😢 . What nonsense . Become mature guys
Gukesh rocked west world shocked 😂😂😂 .
Gukesh deserves his title 100%! And also we celebrated his victory just like many in the west world :)
Undisputed and lineal world champion!, to borrow boxing terminology.
@@jessejordache1869 lol yeah we will include that in the next video haha
yeah. he is the lucky one. defying all odds and winning the candidates, then ding blundering at the pivotal moment. this will definitely go down in history
He surely did a great job and played an amazing Match against Ding. He deserved it 100%.
i thought someone can win a chess game when blunder occurs, i think i was wrong. Can you tell me what are the other odd's that someone can win a chess game without any blunder?
@@studentscouncil659 apparently a perfect game by computers will always lead to a draw. But those computers have an elo of like 3600. I would say Game 6 of the world championship between magnus and ian nepomniatschi would be a good example of someone winning a game without their opponent blundering.
He won. I dont think anyone now has right to judge if he 'deserved ' it. He fought and won. Period !!
@@diadon5674 you definetly right, he 100% deserved it!
The only reason everyone is salty is because gukesh is brown
as a brown person i must say because gukesh isnt the best player in chess
even though happy that the crown returned to our country
@@shironeko3107 he is 18 and very far off from actually reaching his true elo. Magnus at 18 was rated lower than Gukesh. If everyone is better than him then why did they not win candidates ? Caruana is better than gukesh? Cool, win candidates and then beat him
@@kartikeyatiwari2502 it's not about age it's about the title and the title is for the best player not the youngest.
Even though he won the current best player didn't even attend the championship
@@kartikeyatiwari2502 also about magnus rated lower than gukesh ( I'm not really sure ) magnus didn't have the previous championship owner as a mentor
Amazing video guys! Really enjoyed the editing and the nice narrating voice of dre ;)
@@theog96 thanks buddy! Appreciate it 😉
You may as very well be right, but its a piss poor take because you simply have no weight here, as you're not quoting anyone and are just ranting your own opinions. Unless you're a grandmaster, none of us care about your opinion as an individual.
I mean we are definetly showing what people said and also you dont have to be a grandmaster for people to care. Example is GothamChess
I can't understand one thing, why the world, few nations and fellow few GMs and few former GMs are raged with such an envy over his victory 💔💔
I think and deeply believe the main cause is India not only holds the "world championship" but also the "world's youngest champion"🏆 ever!!
He came step by step, cleared and came no. 1 in candidates thereby qualified for world championship challenger. After a very hard tough competition he managed to win after a great struggle.
Despite of many odds both himself and his family faced. At last he made it.
Many doubt of Ding blunder. But, "To err is human" everyone makes mistake. No matter he is GM or super GM. Just mere humans at the base!!
Ding is a very strong solid player.
Please appreciate Gukesh he is just a budding super GM.
Above all he is a super gentleman I have ever seen. Who truly deserved to be the world champion.
I deeply believe in.
❤ Gukesh ❤
Ty for this comment, very good words :)
Truely a historic moment gukesh gave us!
Nice name, i understood after your video
Thank you! That was our goal! :)
Some mistakes, which are necessary for a decisive result, but most games were fighting chess. I agree with you guys.
(In actual reality, the worst championship of the last quarter-century was Kasparov-Kramnik, since Shirov won the Candidates final and Kasparov, who was the head of the federation AND the world champion (conflict of interest anyone?) replaced Shirov with Kramnik by fiat. Kramnik went on to beat Kasparov, mostly by boring him to death.)
So, for the first time ever, you had a World Champion who hadn't earned the right to play the match in the first place. This is HIGHLY ironic, because if you've ever read anything by Kasparov, he's *convinced* that there was a huge conspiracy to replace him as Karpov's opponent in 1984: "I can't prove it, but I know it!". Turns out, he just thinks that because that's what HE would do. I don't mean to cast shade on Kasparov -- he's an excellent writer and teacher, EXCEPT when talking about himself. In _My Great Predecessors,_ I was happily surprised by how fair and insightful he was about Karpov, who's my favorite player, and sort of a sleeper "best of all time".
true it was fighting chess and surely very interesting to watch! Also, very interesting what you said (especially since Kasparov complains a lot about FIDE tournaments). This will be something we will look into! ty! :)
@@2ChessNoobs NP: I got trolled by the title into thinking your question was a statement (a few other commenters are having that problem), so apologies if you read my extremely snarky first draft :/
@@jessejordache1869 dont worry haha. The video clearly shows we were celebrating with Gukesh :)
World classical champion ❌
World Chess Champion ✅
❤❤😅😅
I think we said both :)
well deserved at the same time lucky and tbh becoz of Magnus WCC doesnot feel valuable
yeah i understand that argument. Its not gukesh's fault tho, he simply deserved it still :)
Assume for a second that, in football, an underdog like Sweden just won the World Cup
Would they be called the best out there? No.
If situations had not been favorable to them, would they have become world champions in football? Possibly No.
But did they become world champions? Yes.
Titles in each sport are discussed like this and often the most deserving or strongest is not the world champion. To be the world champion, you have to play the cards right and hope conditions are favorable. Kudos to Gukesh for doing everything right enough to be world champion. Who participated and who didn’t is irrelevant now. It’s what it is. And he’s the youngest world champion
@@VichitraChitta01 bruh I said well deserved for a reason also chess isnot football here the WCC is always the best player except two cases one during Bobby Fisher's Era and Now because of Magnus so being WCC is like being no 2 I mean Gukesh isn't even the Highest rated player from his country so it's just unjustified all this Magnus effect has changed Chess History the WCC is just a Top10 Player of the world
Yes Gukesh created history and he did it in an spectacular fashion and I am rooting for him to bring a new era of Chess Indeed I hope he quickly becomes the Strongest in terms of title and strenght so that chess history get improved
@@zarathustra_13agreed friend
World champion used to mean something before.. It used to mean that best chess player in the world.. Now it just means someone who got lucky and played when best player got too bored and current wc is mentally ill
the first part is the reason why so many GMs critizised it. But gukesh didnt get lucky... i dont think you win the candidates by being lucky so he definetly had his fair share
If that's the case what's the point of organising the championship? Who knows there may be better chess player than Magnus in the world who is not interested in competing. Does that make Magnus's titles less deserving?
@@the3rdEye2187 no, Ding and now Gukesh 100% deserved the title! No doubt about that. There is just a couple GMs that dont like the format of the championship. Doesnt mean titles are less deserving in our opinion :)
@2ChessNoobs I agree. Is he the best chess player right now? I don't think so. However those questioning whether he 'DESERVE' the World Champion title or not is a bit condescending. He didn't reach the final stage by LUCK or CHANCE only.
@2ChessNoobs I agree. Is he the best chess player right now? I don't think so. However those questioning whether he 'DESERVE' the World Champion title or not is a bit condescending. He didn't reach the final stage by LUCK or CHANCE only.