It has been brought to my attention that I actually played the Komodo engine in this video, and Stockfish is chess.com's analysis engine. Sorry for the slip up! Here is a video where we play the REAL Stockfish 17: m.ruclips.net/video/-cQ58zhZrSo/видео.html&pp=ygUhaG93IG1hbnkgcXVlZW5zIHRvIGJlYXQgc3RvY2tmaXNo And thanks to those that pointed it out :)
@@itsdanmoore Where are you going after you die? What happens next? Have you ever thought about that? Repent today and give your life to Jesus Christ to obtain eternal salvation. Tomorrow may be too late my brethen😢. Hebrews 9:27 says "And as it is appointed unto man once to die, but after that the judgement
Doubling up your pawns in the first game froze the whole left wing in place. This allowed black to focus on building an advantage on the right. Combine this with sending the bishop out to the left by itself and this created enough of an imbalance for black to break through on the right. I don't think any of the ideas you tried were poor, quite the contrary. But it was more a matter of not properly supporting your attacks, and over-congesting the left side. I would say intentionally doubling your pawns (especially after talking about how it, "wasn't usually the best idea") was a flat out blunder. But I think if you had played more aggressively you may have been able to equalize a bit better afterward. There were a number of moments where you decided to respond to his threat by "evading" or "blocking;" however, you almost never decided to respond to his threat with a threat of your own. Sometimes offense is the best defense. And sometimes you need to cut your losses in a position and attempt to free up an advantage in another part of the board. After he retreated his Bishop from the 1st rank, you could have played h4 to pressure it all the way back and open up space for your right wing to breathe. That bishop also ended up being the lynchpin piece that enabled the entirety of black's assault on the right, so forcing it back would have taken quite a bit of black's punch away. You mention a lot during the match how he was "disconnecting your pieces," I would challenge that and say that you did a lot of the disconnecting on your own, the engine simply capitalized. Pushing e5 without castling first is a pretty clear idea given the position, if you ask me you were in no position to even think about his king, therefore he has no need to preemptively defend an attack that won't come. The engine would rather spend that time consolidating it's overall position. It'd already won the battle on the right, and an attack on the left would come about as quick as Napoleon's 3rd reign, so all that leaves is the center. There were also a couple moments earlier in the game where you could have gone b4 into d5 with your c2 knight to threaten the center, and relieve pressure on the right, but by the time the knight joined the attack it was too late. You also mention a lot at the end about him, "not capitalizing on his advantage," but he does. Developing his pieces in those moment ensures that he remains ahead on tempo, because while you deal with the threat he just placed in front of you, he's preparing the next threat. You seem to often miss the forest for the trees. You played the second game like a different person. It's clear you lost the first game before the first move, and were trying to just, "hold on" as opposed to actually win. The mentality shift in the second game is a big factor in how well you did. Probably played 500 points higher in the second game off the mentality alone, screw the extra queen. That's just my opinions though... Feel free to ignore them.
I believe you are mistaken about the doubled pawns. Doubling your pawns is a common motif in Qb6 lines of the London as it earns a semi-open file for your rook and does not create any meaningful weaknesses. The knight play was sloppy and f3 gave the engine a lot of play for no gain. I would argue those were the main weaknesses of his opening.
The fact you’re extremely good at explaining and making a ton of sense and magnus is 800 rating above you just goes to show they’re astronomically insane at chess
I just stumbled upon this channel in my recommended. You’ve got potential! I didn’t expect your subscriber count to be so low. You’ve earned a subscription and the quality of your content makes you a very underrated content creator. Hope to see you grow in the future!
It's terrifying how everything always seems to wind up being perfect for the engine. It's just manipulating every single piece on the board at all times
Also it isnt stockfish, it's komodo. Forgot to mention he had two queens in the secons gamw so yeah a lot of people would win with two queens, not sayong he is bad he is really good but you are just glazing the ever licing shiznit out of him
Geez your videos are actually unreal. You’re great at explaining, especially since I’m a 550 rated player, and I love your soothing voice as well. Good luck in the future and cannot wait for you to become a massive part of the chess community. Best of luck in improving as well, from Australia 🇦🇺
15:54 I am not qualified to correct you, but I think offering a queen trade (Qh4) would be better because you would be up a queen like at the start, but get rid of it’s most powerful checkmating/defending piece. Love the vid
Fun usage for 1 queen: 1) You need it to be on A rank. 2) Qa2-f7 Immediately capture enemy's pawn. So, you make stockfish's king move, and it can no loger castle!
At 2:52 can someone explain why it was not considered an option to capture the knight on c6? This would allow him to move his knight safely to e5 without it being attacked. You lose the bishop, but get their knight, and it advances your pieces forward for more center board control instead of retreating the knight back where it us less powerful.
Hey! This isn’t a bad idea at all and certainly could have been on the table. Generally speaking however, a bishop exerting pressure on a knight is considered better than the knight itself, especially when the bishop on d7 has to stay put to interpose the pin. Trading off an active bishop for a stationary knight may not be bad in this context to centralize the f3 knight, but I personally overlooked it because conceptually it’s usually not the best move. If you are the one on offense, it’s typically better to keep the tension on the board rather than trade it off. That’s my analysis, and excellent suggestion and question :)
Hey man i just wanted to let you know you definitely deserve far more subscribers and i think you are well on your way Im only a few minutes in and i absolutely love your commentary, when the engine plays h4 in the first game my first thought was "free pawn? How could that be bad?" and the fact that you answered my question immediately makes me really excited to keep watching
@iwantcheckmate excited to see it man! One thought I had is you mentioned at the end looking at game review and checking brilliant moves and stuff, I think that would have been cool to see. I don't know if you're open to ideas, but just a thought I had is that it would be cool to see a little bit of post game analysis, maybe the highlights? Moves that the engine praised, and, positions you thought were (close to) even, that the computer hated, for example, in the first game you went Nf5 instead of cxd5, (or Nxg2, which walks into a fork) the engine evaluation dropped from like -2 to -8. I don't know if you already thought about this kinda thing and decided against it, or maybe it would fit in a shorter video or something, I can see how you wouldn't want to make a 30 minute video even longer, but I would've happily watched it Feel free to totally disregard this by the way!
21:50 doesn't the move rook to f4 win? If the pawn takes then you check with the queen on h3, and if the knight runs you take the pawn with the queen on f5 for free, with some sort of mating idea in the near future
You’re doing a great job, and I wish you even more success and recognition. However, I think your videos could be even better if you analyzed the games after losing or even wining
In game 1 you could have taken his knight on C6 with the bishop and check. If he takes with pawn, then maybe see what the engine thought about A1 to A6. If instead he blocks with the bishop, trade a bishop for a bishop and another check. His knight at least would be going backwards to recapture since he would probably want to reserve the castle and not recapture with the King. Then move your other bishop to prevent its capture.
Awesome job at making it that far with no advantage! But I want to point out that the engine you played was Komodo dragon (I think), which has around 50 elo less than stockfish.
24:27 Isn't the queen trade forge after ...Kg8 (forced)// Qd8+ Kg7 // Qd7+ Kg6//Qxh7 Kxh7 and the king is in the h colum instead of the g. which is a little worse I think
This was very nice. Your explanations are great, but also sometimes I disagree with your move and it feels frustrating even though at this challenge I would certainly not fare better than you did lol.
at 11:06 wouldnt knight to h4 have been better? Force him to take the other knight and you can recapture with your rook on d1. It's a similar result to what you did but you would have essentially an unguarded knight to clean up his undefended pawns. I'm not a chess expert, it's just what i was thinking
If Ne4, black could capture the knight with the pawn, which defends his own knight for the next turn. If I take the pawn with fxe4, Nf2+ incoming. Good question! :)
Now I'm curious to see how many extra pawns would be needed for you to be able to beat stockfish. The only issue is that they will be very obstructive to your position so two extra pawns won't help much. i can see you pulling a win at 4-5 extra pawns minimum.
At around 4:25 you may have been able to protect your knight with the one rook and be able to make a trade, idk if its a good idea tho as im no where near Profesional
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
It has been brought to my attention that I actually played the Komodo engine in this video, and Stockfish is chess.com's analysis engine. Sorry for the slip up! Here is a video where we play the REAL Stockfish 17:
m.ruclips.net/video/-cQ58zhZrSo/видео.html&pp=ygUhaG93IG1hbnkgcXVlZW5zIHRvIGJlYXQgc3RvY2tmaXNo
And thanks to those that pointed it out :)
It’s ok😄
Yeah, you'd probably need a couple more queens for SF on CCRL. Now is a good time, too, considering SF 17 is here.
You could always change the title and description
@@lorddashdonalddappington2653 nobody knows what komodo is. Stockfish and good engine are basically synonymous anyway
This isn't even the full power SF. One queen advantage is honestly overkill for a 2000+ player
'It will be interesting to see what the engine says about my play after this game' Yes, it would've been.
💀
222likes😮
@@iwantcheckmatestill not saying it jesus
@@iwantcheckmatelove the video and all and it was really fun and informative but I'm unironically pissed you never showed that at the end
@@PremiumUsername
To everyone in this chat, I just want to let you know that *Jesus loves you* and he can *save you from sin,* sadness and sickness.
challenge idea: beat nelson but he has no queen so he's depressed and immediately resigns
Solid plan
many queens would nelson with no queens need to beat stockfish?
The fabled M0
Nelson is a doofus
@@iwantcheckmateI am the70th like
Love the way you explain every move haha, learned a lot today
Happy to hear it :)
Agreed, you’ve earned a sub!
yea, i've learned a lot from this match. mainly the principles of what to do in X. great job.
@@itsdanmooremake it two
@@itsdanmoore
Where are you going after you die?
What happens next? Have you ever thought about that?
Repent today and give your life to Jesus Christ to obtain eternal salvation. Tomorrow may be too late my brethen😢.
Hebrews 9:27 says "And as it is appointed unto man once to die, but after that the judgement
Video idea: play bullet against martin but you lose a piece every game
Sounds fun and terrifying haha
Ooooo that's a good one!! 😁
you can’t play a timed game with a bot sadly
@1stDaylight He could just set his own timer
Doubling up your pawns in the first game froze the whole left wing in place. This allowed black to focus on building an advantage on the right. Combine this with sending the bishop out to the left by itself and this created enough of an imbalance for black to break through on the right. I don't think any of the ideas you tried were poor, quite the contrary. But it was more a matter of not properly supporting your attacks, and over-congesting the left side. I would say intentionally doubling your pawns (especially after talking about how it, "wasn't usually the best idea") was a flat out blunder. But I think if you had played more aggressively you may have been able to equalize a bit better afterward. There were a number of moments where you decided to respond to his threat by "evading" or "blocking;" however, you almost never decided to respond to his threat with a threat of your own. Sometimes offense is the best defense. And sometimes you need to cut your losses in a position and attempt to free up an advantage in another part of the board. After he retreated his Bishop from the 1st rank, you could have played h4 to pressure it all the way back and open up space for your right wing to breathe. That bishop also ended up being the lynchpin piece that enabled the entirety of black's assault on the right, so forcing it back would have taken quite a bit of black's punch away. You mention a lot during the match how he was "disconnecting your pieces," I would challenge that and say that you did a lot of the disconnecting on your own, the engine simply capitalized. Pushing e5 without castling first is a pretty clear idea given the position, if you ask me you were in no position to even think about his king, therefore he has no need to preemptively defend an attack that won't come. The engine would rather spend that time consolidating it's overall position. It'd already won the battle on the right, and an attack on the left would come about as quick as Napoleon's 3rd reign, so all that leaves is the center. There were also a couple moments earlier in the game where you could have gone b4 into d5 with your c2 knight to threaten the center, and relieve pressure on the right, but by the time the knight joined the attack it was too late. You also mention a lot at the end about him, "not capitalizing on his advantage," but he does. Developing his pieces in those moment ensures that he remains ahead on tempo, because while you deal with the threat he just placed in front of you, he's preparing the next threat. You seem to often miss the forest for the trees.
You played the second game like a different person. It's clear you lost the first game before the first move, and were trying to just, "hold on" as opposed to actually win. The mentality shift in the second game is a big factor in how well you did. Probably played 500 points higher in the second game off the mentality alone, screw the extra queen.
That's just my opinions though... Feel free to ignore them.
Very thorough analysis! Thanks for the input
Big words hurt brain
I believe you are mistaken about the doubled pawns. Doubling your pawns is a common motif in Qb6 lines of the London as it earns a semi-open file for your rook and does not create any meaningful weaknesses. The knight play was sloppy and f3 gave the engine a lot of play for no gain. I would argue those were the main weaknesses of his opening.
24:26 he was like "Did you just make a 360 backwards jump??"
“He’s bad”
“He’s bad”
“Holy shit why is he so good”
I would scold my child for such move
Proceeds to find out that all was going as planned
That’s not stockfish, that’s maximum.
its not stockfish, youre right. Its Kommodo 25
Based on stockfish
@@McFlurry3301 no, based on Komodo sweetheart
@@Schnitzelwurmwt o dam, ok nvm
The fact you’re extremely good at explaining and making a ton of sense and magnus is 800 rating above you just goes to show they’re astronomically insane at chess
They really are 😅 and thank you for the kind comment!
Play the bot again and everytime it beats you, you remove one of it's pieces. How bout that?
I like that idea!
I love how this guy talks about his thoughts and plans throughout the game. It’s very clear and and calming👍
Thank you!
This was such a good video u do a good job at explaining it's funny because when I think of a move you explain how that particular move is losing 😂
If it makes you feel better I’m explaining it because I thought of it too hahaha
Didn’t realize how little subscribers you had until after I watched the whole video. You definitely deserve a lot more!
Thank you!
I felt like I was in class listening to you talk and explain things as you played. Awesome job!
Thank you! That’s a very nice compliment :)
that's not stockfish, stockfish easily beats this bot
He’s not a bot.
@LucasUng fr u dumb@ss ? maybe because i am talking about the bot side not the channel owner who play queens
@@LucasUngleast obvious rage bait
@@LucasUng 🤦♂️
@@LucasUngwell you are
Video idea: play martin but every time you win remove one piece on your side
Second this idea, sounds fun
I just stumbled upon this channel in my recommended. You’ve got potential! I didn’t expect your subscriber count to be so low. You’ve earned a subscription and the quality of your content makes you a very underrated content creator. Hope to see you grow in the future!
Thank you for the super kind comment! I’ve got lots more vid ideas queued up and coming soon :)
Good video, although this Engine is not Stockfish
8:39 what about Rg1 here? it kinda cuts of the blacks g Rook or am I completely missing something here?
I learnt so much from this video. Thank you for this amazing video. You’ve got a new sub
Thank you :)
Very well played :) This was much more interesting than i expected.
Did you get that brilliant you were vying for?
I don’t believe I did haha
this was extremely interesting video, loved it
Thank you!
Subbed! Your teaching style of explaining the consequences of each move thoroughly is amazing
Thank you! :D
very dedicated creator, you reminded me about chess and how much fun it is
Thank you :)
You should do a series where you try to beat all bots but you have 3 minute for each
It was very entertaining to see your expertise at work!
Thank you very much!
Damn such a nice video, subscribed, such a good explanation of the moves and ideas, i am new to chess so this was very helpful and fun
I’m glad you enjoyed! :)
It's terrifying how everything always seems to wind up being perfect for the engine. It's just manipulating every single piece on the board at all times
It really is, it’s fun to learn from but quite difficult to play against 😅
Dude, that first match. As soon as you retreated knight to E1, it was like the AI smelt blood in the water.
Literally hahahaha
Man this guy's a genius. He made it to the endgame vs stockfish on his first game . Anybody else would not have even lasted for a few moves
Man guess what this guy completely destroyed stockfish in the 2nd game . I doubt magnus carlsen or hikaru Nakamura could do that
This must be iwantcheckmates's second account
bro this is not stockfish😂
bro is an alt account of iwantcheckmate
Holy glaze. Who let his alt account let loose?
Also it isnt stockfish, it's komodo. Forgot to mention he had two queens in the secons gamw so yeah a lot of people would win with two queens, not sayong he is bad he is really good but you are just glazing the ever licing shiznit out of him
The way you explain all the moves and ideas flowing inside your mind makes it easier to understand, more so than anyone else. Great video!
I appreciate that! Thanks :)
11:06 h4 was the move
Yessir! Put pressure on the rook, or take. If he still decided to check with knight to f2 (unlikely), easy defend.
How many bishops to beat stockfish
Geez your videos are actually unreal. You’re great at explaining, especially since I’m a 550 rated player, and I love your soothing voice as well. Good luck in the future and cannot wait for you to become a massive part of the chess community. Best of luck in improving as well, from Australia 🇦🇺
Thanks! I appreciate the kind comment
4:39 you didnt actually have to move the bishop because the pawn was pinned to the rook
Wow man nice content i like this so much
Thanks and glad you enjoyed!
Same here ur the best ytuber I know !🎉
I would love to see the game review at the end of these videos
Nice vid, it would be cool to see the cpu analisys tho
I don't know anything about chess, but I watched your whole video just for how you describe the game like it's some kind of fight or something.
Hahaha thank you :)
this is really polished great effort
Thank you :)
i wish we got the game review at the end
15:54 I am not qualified to correct you, but I think offering a queen trade (Qh4) would be better because you would be up a queen like at the start, but get rid of it’s most powerful checkmating/defending piece. Love the vid
Thank you! And I’m always open to feedback, this is my first time facing stockfish with a queen too haha
show us the review!
Oh yes good point!!
Your explanation were good it didn't feel boring or serious at all. You sounded like a narrator.
Thank you :)
I like how you explain everything thats happening so well!
Thank you! :D
love the videos man :) keep it up, fun to watch while eating or just chilling, stay safe!
Thank you! I have a plan to post daily so more to come :)
Damm I was just expecting the game review after the game ended
NO QUEENS, HIKARU AND 271 MOVES. THAT WILL BE EASY
But actually that was old stockfish with tons of bugs🤓🤓🤓
So entertaining. Thanks for that.
Fun usage for 1 queen:
1) You need it to be on A rank.
2) Qa2-f7 Immediately capture enemy's pawn.
So, you make stockfish's king move, and it can no loger castle!
At 2:52 can someone explain why it was not considered an option to capture the knight on c6? This would allow him to move his knight safely to e5 without it being attacked. You lose the bishop, but get their knight, and it advances your pieces forward for more center board control instead of retreating the knight back where it us less powerful.
Hey! This isn’t a bad idea at all and certainly could have been on the table. Generally speaking however, a bishop exerting pressure on a knight is considered better than the knight itself, especially when the bishop on d7 has to stay put to interpose the pin. Trading off an active bishop for a stationary knight may not be bad in this context to centralize the f3 knight, but I personally overlooked it because conceptually it’s usually not the best move. If you are the one on offense, it’s typically better to keep the tension on the board rather than trade it off. That’s my analysis, and excellent suggestion and question :)
Wow thanks for the quick answer!@@iwantcheckmate
@@johnmarksmithmiller9895 Of course!
"I'm gonna play F3"
Ben Finegold, somewhere:
Improved challenge idea: Give yourself an extra queen but you have to do the bongcloud
This was great :)
Thank you :)
Hey man i just wanted to let you know you definitely deserve far more subscribers and i think you are well on your way
Im only a few minutes in and i absolutely love your commentary, when the engine plays h4 in the first game my first thought was "free pawn? How could that be bad?" and the fact that you answered my question immediately makes me really excited to keep watching
Thank you for the super nice comment, glad you enjoyed and more to come!
@iwantcheckmate excited to see it man! One thought I had is you mentioned at the end looking at game review and checking brilliant moves and stuff, I think that would have been cool to see.
I don't know if you're open to ideas, but just a thought I had is that it would be cool to see a little bit of post game analysis, maybe the highlights? Moves that the engine praised, and, positions you thought were (close to) even, that the computer hated, for example, in the first game you went Nf5 instead of cxd5, (or Nxg2, which walks into a fork) the engine evaluation dropped from like -2 to -8.
I don't know if you already thought about this kinda thing and decided against it, or maybe it would fit in a shorter video or something, I can see how you wouldn't want to make a 30 minute video even longer, but I would've happily watched it
Feel free to totally disregard this by the way!
This is actually a tutorial to how to play chess.
Haha glad it was helpful!
@20:10 why not move g5>e7 to fork the rooks?
The queen protects one rook so there isn’t a real threat after that then re8 pins the queen to the knight
Also allowing the e pawn to be hit if the knight moved
Very well explained
Thanks! :D
I'd kill to see that game review.
Stockfish is trained on the standard board arrangement, does the engine perform as well with non-standard setups?
I believe it can perform at a very high, over-human level anyway
Ive been subbed to this guy before 500 subs and holy moly I love this guy def one of my fav chess Yt if not my 2nd ( 1st is top chess)
Thank you! And haha yes I’m subscribed to a bunch of awesome channels too, I’m happy to be one of your favs!!
@@iwantcheckmate:D
I want to see the game review!!
21:50 doesn't the move rook to f4 win? If the pawn takes then you check with the queen on h3, and if the knight runs you take the pawn with the queen on f5 for free, with some sort of mating idea in the near future
You’re doing a great job, and I wish you even more success and recognition. However, I think your videos could be even better if you analyzed the games after losing or even wining
Someone else mentioned this and I agree! I may start incorporating them in some future videos
In game 1 you could have taken his knight on C6 with the bishop and check. If he takes with pawn, then maybe see what the engine thought about A1 to A6. If instead he blocks with the bishop, trade a bishop for a bishop and another check. His knight at least would be going backwards to recapture since he would probably want to reserve the castle and not recapture with the King. Then move your other bishop to prevent its capture.
Awesome job at making it that far with no advantage! But I want to point out that the engine you played was Komodo dragon (I think), which has around 50 elo less than stockfish.
Yes! See pinned comment :)
24:27 Isn't the queen trade forge after ...Kg8 (forced)// Qd8+ Kg7 // Qd7+ Kg6//Qxh7 Kxh7 and the king is in the h colum instead of the g. which is a little worse I think
Yes, probably a reason why he played Qg7 instead :)
Stockfish will not forget that extra queen scheme and will nuke humans if he ever gains consciousness in the future
This was an oversight on my part 😬
I just need one more queen to defeat stockfish
Nice!
This is not stockfish this is komodo
Yes, see pinned comment :)
video idea: how many bishops to beat magnus
Playing against chess engines is seeing completely questionable moves that look like blunders but it's actually mate in 30 moves.
This was very nice. Your explanations are great, but also sometimes I disagree with your move and it feels frustrating even though at this challenge I would certainly not fare better than you did lol.
I totally understand! Feel free to comment any ideas you had and thank you for watching :)
At 4:29 why didnt you just look for a better move?… im not that high rated but the pawn IS pinned to rook right?
I am rated 1000 and I think first game was more brutal than what would be between you and me
Haha it was rough for sure
You should show the review in your next vid
Idea: play martin, and the goal is to make the game last as long as possible (in moves) and maybe win
Show the game review next time! Let’s see if you had any brilliant moves
But ofc…amazing video!
Would you consider doing a games with viewers type video? Maybe an educational type thing?
This is something I’ll consider doing soon!
Video Idea: You give nelson a free queen ( or rook ) everytime you win, Until you lose.
I like it!
at 11:06 wouldnt knight to h4 have been better? Force him to take the other knight and you can recapture with your rook on d1. It's a similar result to what you did but you would have essentially an unguarded knight to clean up his undefended pawns. I'm not a chess expert, it's just what i was thinking
Not a bad idea! I’d assume he’d still play Nf2+ and then pick up the exchange. Interesting suggestion!
21:50 i’m new to chess but why would queen to h7 be a bad move wouldn’t that win the game?
nvm i’m an idiot can you tell?
Haha don’t be so hard on yourself
@@iwantcheckmate thank you 🙏🤣
How do you add more pieces, like without promotion how would i start with like 3 rooks or smth
Custom position then play against computer
@@iwantcheckmate ohhhh, Thanks!
at 4:30 if he takes your bishop with pawn can't you just take his rook and check?
At 12:17 could you not have played knight to e4 instead?
If Ne4, black could capture the knight with the pawn, which defends his own knight for the next turn. If I take the pawn with fxe4, Nf2+ incoming. Good question! :)
What were your game review stats
Don’t have them anymore but I’ll start incorporating it in future videos
@ Yay
I was screaming F rook to G1 before that knight to F2 was even a concern. Should've pushed that rook trade.
Took a lot less than I thought
Now I'm curious to see how many extra pawns would be needed for you to be able to beat stockfish. The only issue is that they will be very obstructive to your position so two extra pawns won't help much. i can see you pulling a win at 4-5 extra pawns minimum.
I like this idea! I may need a few more pawns depending on how well I can adapt to the new starting position
How many pieces less do you need to get check mated by Martin
Dodging checks! I like this as a video idea!!!
I guess I'll sub since everyone else is doing it
Choo choo all aboard
I think that axb3 in the first game was a big mistake. The problem here is that your Knight in d2 has basically nowhere to go after that.
Play Nelson with multiple queens. He'd probably be pretty excited 🤣
Haha sounds good!
At around 4:25 you may have been able to protect your knight with the one rook and be able to make a trade, idk if its a good idea tho as im no where near Profesional
Can we see the game review?
I may start including these in future videos
can the top 10 world deciding/voting which move to play can beat this 3200 elo stockfish ?
That’s a good question, I’m not sure but my gut says it’s unlikely.
can u make a tutorial video for us how we can play these custom positions against the bots
Bro how do you have a rating of 2000 and only 3k subs we need to fix that