Psychologist Disagrees with Amber Heard's Diagnoses by Dr. Shannon Curry
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 май 2022
- During her testimony on Tuesday, Forensic Psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes testified that she disagrees with Dr. Shannon Curry's diagnoses of Amber Heard. Dr. Hughes was called to the stand by Heard's legal team, while Dr. Curry was called by Depp's legal team.
#JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter! bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on RUclipsTV!
tv.ruclips.net/user/welcome?...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
READ MORE GREAT ARTICLES FROM LAW&CRIME NETWORK HERE:
lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS:
Coptales&Cocktails Apple Podcast:
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Law&Crime Sidebar:
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
So, let me get this straight. Johnny Depp was NEVER tested by her and never interviewed by her and her assessment was done completely on what Amber reported?? Does anybody else see a problem with this???
👍
@YAAD yeah but dr. curry didn't attempt to diagnose or jump to conclusions about johnny like this woman did
Dr. Curry had dinner at JD's house, that lasted 3-4 hours, so we should assume she got a sense for the man. Thats when she looked at notes and depos and such, flew and spent 12 hours with AH. So.. idk even though she wasn't clinically evaluating JD she at least spent time with both of them. Dr. Hughes *forgive if mispelled* can't claim the same.
That was so weird to me as well, even Dr. Curry stated multiple times when being questions on Depp’s behavior that she did not test Depp and does not have a diagnosis for him while Heard’s defense attorney try to get her to agree to one for Depp.
Everybody in the medical profession knows it's unethical to diagnose anybody without thorough asessment and examinations. One can't even diagnose Vladimir Putler with any kind of health problem mental or physical even though he's clearly insane and has very much grandiose delusions and swollen face due to glucocorticoid treatment for cancer it's just unethical and way beyond professional. At the VERY LEAST she should have made it very clear that her testimony was not an expert testimony but rather just her own opinion. This woman should not be board certified and i'm very much sure that will change and she should not have a licence to practice anymore
How Dr.Curry identifies an abuser: “The Abuser.”
How this person identifies an abuser: “He.”
Just shows whose the real professional here.
Ugh.
I'm in a minute or two, and cannot continue. She's so pathetic.
Exactly!
Dr.Curry is wonder woman from justice leage, and other from one of the housewives of Beverly Hills.
Imagine how many men lifes she ruined, hope she will never get into any court after that.
I absolutely agree!
So let me get this straight:
JDs legal team hires their own forensic psychologist who does a battery of testing on Amber. Presents her findings painting a picture of Amber based on those findings. She is not swayed but presents her findings on testing and own clinical judgement. AH’s dollar tree lawyers cross exam her and try to discredit her due to “bias”. When that didn’t work they starting throwing anything at the wall to see what will stick, ie muffin incident, accusing her of talking to her own spouse about this case, saying she isn’t board certified, will not let her go back to her 25 page assessment. In contrast to the Defenses psychologist who brings a whole 3 reams of paper and gets to rifle through them at will.
Then here comes the defenses psychologist-who also doesn’t seem to have spent much time with AH. Who discredits and disagrees with EVERY finding that Dr. Curry has. And is the most bias person yet in this trial. And that is fair how?
I really hope this jury weighs this heavily and makes a decision based on logic and the true evidence. And not bullying and emotional outbursts that are seemingly in the realm of acting.
Ready for the cross examination. I hope they are good at note taking. There is a lot to cross exam.
AH's dollar tree lawyers 💀🤣
You killed me w dollar tree laywers. I am dead 😅😁😂🤣
Dollar Tree lawyer's 🤣
Dollar Tree lawyers 😂😂❤
That one lawyer in the back that big man on Johnny's team he was taking so many notes when this woman was on the stand.
There isn’t a single psych exam or test you can give a person that will determine whether or not an event occurred. You’re a psychologist, not a detective. So for her to sit there and claim that her exam of Amber indicates that events occurred based on Amber literally just saying they did is probably the most unethical and ridiculous thing I can imagine in the world of psychology.
Exactly. This is what Dr. Curry said.
Note the simplicity of the PTSD test. It might as well just be asking "do you have PTSD" and "how bad is it?"
Agreed. Also, best Username I've ever seen 😂
@@lissandrafreljord7913 OMG I am watching Dr. Curry's testimony live right now and read your comment just as she had to repeat it again.
@@Anonymous-gu2pk So true!!!
i find it funny that Amber's lawyer is so understanding when this psychologist asks to see her report to "refresh her memory" but when Dr. Curry asked to see the report she ignored it and zoomed past saying she shouldn't need to see the report to remember important stuff...what a hypocrite. It's also interesting to note that she's basing all of the potential behavior from just Heard's account, how does she know that that's actually how Depp responded? It's straight-up hearsay, and we all know we can't take Heard's word on anything.
She’s Amber lawyer.. it’s her job lol
Excellent point! Thanks for reminding us that the attorney did hat. Hopefully, the jury remembers that too!
@Maggie Pegg Very well said. In fact, this 'psychologist' is only their to present a phony veneer of science and objectivity while reporting what Heard claimed. It's ridiculous.
It'll be an interesting cross examination tomorrow, no doubt.
@@simplymeconnie4003 Did AH tell this women that?
This woman should administer every single domestic dispute case! She apparently can 100% tell EXACTLY what happened without even being present! Amazing for a mere human being!
Exactly what i was thinking
Dr Currey said its not a physcologist job to find out what happened.. they only asses personalities
Right ?! This lady makes me so frustrated
@@IsraaN Ikr, that's what I was thinking the whole time listening to her testimony. Almost all she said was all just hearsay. Don't know why Johnny's team didn't object this. Maybe it's part of their strategy?
@@piercingspear2922 Most likely Ben (JD's lawyer) didn't want to object yet to make AH's team more pathetic when it comes to their counter-arguments, with relation to what Dr. Curry's responses and explanations were when she took the stand.
Are these tests based on what she observes or what she is told? This witness needs to go. What’s the name of these tests? Pfffttt
May I just say, that Dr Curry is most definitely a psychologist that I’d like to go to for my own complex mental health struggles. Whereas, Dr Hughs is someone I would not feel comfortable around at all. I think that says a lot.
Prepare to be told your narcissistic partner or friend is the victim & something is wrong with you. Something happened to someone I know where a bad psychologist didn't recognise someone was dealing with a narcissist & blamed the victim as being obsessed.
Oh for sure, would freeze up with her there. Dr Curry has very nice energy.
EXACTLY 💯
@@izabelaR I disagree, I think she would pander to the person visiting her regardless of the truth so she would get her money. Why would she blame the person paying her lol
She's so good she should be charging $2m an hour so even people like you and I can't go and see her! :p
My first marriage was abusive. It was in the 70’s, when no one wanted to talk about domestic violence. I got out, filed a restraining order. To this day, I can recall the terror. No fake tears, no whining - terror. Amber, in my view, does not exhibit the signs of being in an abusive relationship nor having PTSD. I have lived it for 40 years. Now married to a saint on earth who helped me heal. SGT
So, because she Miss Amber does not exhibit those signs to you, it means she hasn't have them, that's an absurd thinking,
You don't know her personally more than what you just watch here.
This is bizarre. I work as a counselor, when I do notes I put it in a “client stated…” I wouldn’t take what clients state as fact. It’s their experience not fact.
Exactly! AH stated to me…..
Exactly, even as a medical assistant on patients' charts we explicitly write "Patient stated..., or patient states..." Those are their claims, we don't know what happened for a fact.
Well you would if you were for sale, and your job was to introduce through the back door, “hearsay” as actual evidence. 😉. That woman is slimy. The whole team on that side is so… slimy, abrasive, hard to like.. you just know energetically they are all dirty.
Bingo you nailed it
this person was paid off, he license should be revoked
She discredited herself by labeling men as abusers. She kept using “he” even when not specifically naming JD. Her bias against male DV victims is obvious. And the VA jury will see right through this. They are not in LA anymore.
Yes and the victims she always would say "she". This woman is pathetic.
I remember her comment saying “typically men” how awful
Noticed that. I guess she never met anyone like my mom who used to beat and torture her three little boys until they were old enough to run away from home and live their lives full of pain and confusion.
Someone count those ummms.
Exactly
This woman looks like a bully. Mean, angry and dramatizing. Same as AH, what a team. Selective and incomplete information instead of the truth. A person to hire when you need someone to BS for you. Money talks. Imagine how many people this awful woman screwed over.
"This woman looks like a bully"
What kind of childish phrasing is that? You are not a professional, you have absolutely no clue of psychology so don't be as arrogant you poser.
Yes
When she wanted to say abuser, she used 'he'. Please someone tell this lady that the abusive behaviors are not only done by men. It really is increadibly horrible to see gender-biased people in 21st century, especially a psychologist...
It’s a deliberate tactic to make the jury associate the word abuser with masculine implications.
@@philipgodsworth4764 Yeah. And just like us, Johnny Depp's lawyers must have noticed that because the first question they asked in yesterday's testimony was "Why do you always use the pronoun 'he' when you want to address the abuser?"
She's speaking from a statistical standpoint.
@@Asia.Persuasia But we all know that this is not what she meant in this case. She is just trying to create a perception to make Depp guilty in people's minds.
@@Asia.Persuasia except a professional would know not to use words like "he" or "she" in cases like this
Kind of incredible how Amber has managed to put together an entire team of people who are all totally and completely unlikable and off-putting.
Exactly!
"Law of attraction" seems to be working well
@@icesystem7 dont opposites attract tho xD
Birds of a feather
generally the only people who will work with a narcissist are other narcissists
Just like her.
A professional cannot “score” a person without actually testing them and never meeting them! Basing this on Amber’s words is 100% hearsay! I cannot wait for cross-examination tomorrow!!
Shameful
@@fadefade986 It really is!!! It's an insult to the field of psychology!!!
Where's Heard's lawyers now? "Hearsay, Hearsay... Hearsay..."
It’s unbelievable that the jury would take her seriously.
what's cross-examination?
I am always frightened when I see multiple “experts” in the same field with opposite opinions. Not just slightly different, completely opposite assessments of the same subject. We are supposed to trust doctors, historians, law enforcement personnel, yet they continuously get up in front of a camera in these high-profile court cases and show us how unstable their foundations really are.
again, this is a civil suit involving millions upon millions of dollars, where the purpose of these "assessments" are to sway an audience. this is not a clinic
Well like dr K has said : some doctors are bad doctors.
It’s money. Offer enough cash someone will be your expert. Facts
There's an expert epidemic in the law. Justifies higher costs I suppose. I really look forward to AI getting rid of a lot of junk in the legal system.
@@aphrodieMonkey that has nothing to do with an expert. I get that these people are paid well to testify for one side or the other, but having multiple experts with such polarized opinions greatly diminishes the value of the term “expert.”
I love how her entire deposition is directly looking at the jury and saying "the report says mr depp did" when in actuality the report is produced by what AH told them. Sad.
@Mac-Attack except what she said Johnny did was only coming from Amber lol. How is that reliable evidence in any way?
This dr literally got up there and testified that her complete diagnosis was based on what Amber told her. And her evaluation of Johnny was based on what Amber told her SMH
This woman is a laughingstock to professional psychology as a whole
exactly!
She is making false assumptions and allegations. The SAME THING Mr. Depp is fighting against!
I can't wait for the Cross examination. JD's lawyers are gonna end her career.🤣
A lot of people are ruining their own careers by trying to ruin Johnny's.
She will be celebrated in some circles, though. "You go, girl".
nah they're showing their true colors and these people need to be fixed. honestly so gross
karma is a beautiful thing..and shine a light and it shows all truth
Not buying it
That's one of the most astute comments I've seen re this case.
How did they find a psychologist willing to break all ethics surrounding this field of science?
Wow.
Sadly, probably easily. Dishonest people will do anything for a buck.
Easy $500 an hour
I'm a retired ER RN who once had to deal with the likes of this level of "doctor." I could easily convince her that I have any of a large number of psychological pathologies with minimal effort.
Also, it's really off-putting (to me, at least) that she looks at the jury and not AH's lawyer when she answers the lawyer's question. I get that's she speaking to the jury because they ultimately have to issue the verdict, but there's something 'performative' and 'manipulative' about it 😬
She's the exact type you go to if you want to score drugs like adderall or xanax (assuming she is even able to prescribe). You can just go to WebMD, look up the symptoms of ADHD or an Anxiety disorder, then just say that's what you experience.
It’s horrible how she’s literally trying to defend Heard rather than give her psychological evaluation in honest. Like she really tried to bring the pity party, you can really tell with the tone of her voice throughout this.
Didn’t Amber report to her nursed that she struggled with similar issues with prior partners? Wasn’t she arrested for DV with a previous partner. How can the psychologist say there’s no evidence of the behaviors before or after?
@@vincejohn8413 that was first thing that came into my mimd when she said that
@@vincejohn8413 There is a history for sure.
She is totally biased. Hope Depp’s team will mop the floor with her today.
@@jjjonse when will johnny's team question her?
90% of this witness' dialogue is hearsay, 10% reading.
The problem with her scoring so high on all 4 PTSD tests is its highly unlikely even in the most traumatized people. This entire case would have her so broken down she wouldn't be able to function if it was that traumatic. I can't believe this psych isn't questioning the fact that the test results are a bit suspicious .
I didn't even score that high after my abuser attempted to murder me infront of my son, and was in the hospital for a week over my injuries. Doesn't even take my experience to see all of her team is lying as much as her. Unbelievable.
Agree! And the overreporting is sooo well known in psychology and Mmpi-2 is very valuable to detect over-reporting.
i have comp,ex ptsd from decades of various forms of severe trauma that i won't elaborate on, and i score extremely high on all symptom-exploring tests. i cannot function like a normal person, in any way. every moment of my life is negatively effected by the extreme symptoms that i experience. i cannot have a romantic relationship, my friendships are inevitably destroyed by my erratic emotions and behavior. i cannot work, i cannot concentrate. i can't even read a book because of the noise in my mind all of the time. puplic speaking is unthinkable. amber heard is making movies, marrying movie stars, standing in front of large groups of people and speaking without shame or fear, traveling around the world, etc etc etc. amber heard makes a mockery of people like me, with true extreme forms of ptsd.
She didn't score the highest,
She scored 28%, were you not listening!,
She even said is an average percentage,
try again!
As a psychologist I am shocked how inept this „expert” is. Period.
Oh man. As a psychologist I put my head down in shame. Please, people, keep in mind: we´re not all this way! Most of us hold on to ethical standards and don´t validate test scores on a person we´ve never seen for real. This behavior is so ridiculous, it is really annoying me. She does so much damage to any psychologists reputation!
I was considering doing a masters in clinical psychology but this has genuinely made me sad and hesitant. I can’t say anything else but conclude that practical psychology seems completely meaningless because of this.
so glad you say this because I was thinking it's scary that someone with apparently so many credentials can't conduct themselves properly in court .she shows extreme bias and makes a nonsense of psychology. she is infact very hard to listen to because she is just talking and talking without any real attention to others or the court and I am not a psychologist but I know what ignorance and prejudice sound like. she also states defamatory allegations about JD as fact which is surely proving JD's case for him?
@@pietjepaal9631 I think it is now our job as psychologists to show people that this shown behaviour is NOT the state of the art. Practical psychology is indeed a battlefield and we really need to think about how (in which EXACT words) we describe cases and test scores. I guess Dr. Hughes should even think about it a little longer ;)
Truly unbelievable what Heard and her followers are trying to pull!
This whole thing makes me cringe. I’m a LCDC and I cannot stand this and then she has the audacity to say “we don’t make assumptions”
Why is this “psychologist” so emotionally invested in declaring amber the victim..? For a so called professional this is very strange.
Money
To be fair, there is no such thing as neutrality when it comes to DV. To be neutral is to carry the flag for the abuser, which is no longer neutral.
Because according to some people, only women can be the victim. It's true that this is true in most cases, but in some other cases (even if it's a few) the men are the victims. And some people are so biased and radical that they can't just see the evidence.
Perhaps projection?
@@Tamarahope77 yeah but that isn't her job. her job is to assess all parties here and she didn't even do that. it's been pre-determined by her who the "victim" is, completely baseless
I genuinely feel that we “the people in these comments and those that watch the case closely” can see VERY clearly what’s happening here. There’s just too man unethical wrongdoings in the process here. I’m In the medical field and was a combat medic/Healthcare Specialist in the Army. I worked in a hospital for 4 years working in many different specialized areas to include psych. All I’m gonna say is, this woman is obviously on the take.
This psychologist is literally just regurgitating everything that AH has told her, she's claiming to be able to assess their relationship without having had a SINGLE interaction with Johnny Depp, she refused to talk with/interview AH and Johnny Depp's relationship counselor who believes that AH is lying, she refused to talk with AH's personal nurse who claims to not have seen any wounds or injuries on AH after she came back from Australia which AH claims to have, she reviewed all their notes though and says that she doesn't believe any of them, but she believes everything that AH says and everything that supports AH's claims blindly.
Seems pretty biased to me.
Interesting that she basically says Amber scored practically 100% on everything. The previous psych eval said that someone scoring 100% on everything is more an indicator of someone who studied how to fake the test. I believe the first psych eval more than this
I hope the jury sees this- serioiusly they have to see the difference in concepts and conclusions! plus desperation and atritude from this so called psycologist- fidgetting- pulling faces - rude and common.
well said :-)
I hope Johnny’s lawyers point this out
Amber this time round wasn’t writing her notes! Coz she knows this testimony is what she wrote for the psych to say on her behalf. Lol
Yes, as with everything associated with Ms Heard it's like someone trying to paint a totally saintly picture of her despite all the evidence revealing the total opposite - this is the world narcissists live in, in their minds only. Delusion! I suppose this woman was paid handsomely to give what she has done.
This woman is not credible because she is on the defensive. No need to have an attitude if you know your work is legit.
Exactly.
this woman is nuts i think she hates men she reading notes old ones
But the same argument can be made for the doctor from the other side couldn’t it?
Agree she looks very angry!!
and the psychologist hired by Depp who is the prosecutor was credible? 😂
She doesn’t speak like a psychologist… usually they’re more neutral. Seems like a psychologist is compromised and she’s emotionally Sympathizing
The more I watch this trial the more amazed I am that Johnny made it out alive. We could easily be watching Ambers trial alledging she killed her abuser in self-defense. Really glad you're still with us mate! May Johnny and justice prevail. Glad to see the huge shift in public opinion, finally.
As a psychologist I would like to just say that most of us are NOT like this. This is highly unethical. And by the way, correct me if I am wrong, but an MMPI-2 does NOT TELL YOU if Mr. Depp was abusive to Miss Heard or vica versa. Hope the jury sees this is not the actual case...
Maybe you are not a good one
@@ashcita21 why would you say that?
@@ashcita21 Why so? I am not a psychologist but I have studied psychology in uni. I agree with what she is saying.
@@ashcita21 SMH
As a psychologist I totally agree with you, @Fruszsina Varga. I feel so ashamed watching this video, this woman is an embarrassment to the psychology workfield. There are no tests what so ever that can tell what abusive behaviour took place. It's not our place to say anything about whether a person is guilty or not. And let's not forget that tests can be easy to manipulate if you wish for a certain outcome.
And it's so weird hearing the entire testimony how she often genders domestic violence. Toward the end she sounded emotionally invested( more like a friend trying to defend their friends stand point. Amber's story rather than clinically and objectively. Next to Curry, she doesn't sound professional, spite her background.
Yessss!!!! That's what I thought too !! That she HAS to be a secret friend of hers or something becUse she is just so biased !!!!! At one point I thought this could be her mother, as I was just listening to this on headphones, ugh, I did not like this women at all
Excellent comment and observation.
This is the way that evaluations are truly explained. Dr. Curry's interpretations are amateur and erroneous at best.
That's a really good point. Her gendering of DV in a seemingly clumsy rather than nuanced way seems to point to a misrepresentation of our current understanding of DV.
I was wondering the whole time if he could object for something. That’s completely biased.
It's funny how Jonny's team is patient enough to actually listen and Amber's does the exact opposite
Idk how this lady can state so many credentials and talk about how passionate she is on advocating for DV victims and then present such a gender bias so blatantly through her entire testimony. I worry for the people in her care
There's no way the jury will buy this. Totally primed by Amber's Attorneys, constantly referred to abusers as men and looked liked her opinions were completely personal and not objective. Looking forward to her being cross examined tomorrow. She can't read her pre prepared notes then
YES!! I got the same impression. Always referred to women as victims; I too felt she'd gone through some bad personal stuff.
You’ve got to be joking can’t you hear the judge? The jury is far worse ngl
@@janelfont8874 exactly
What a surprise that she disagrees with Dr. Curry. Who would you believe?
She is not going to be non bias she is over speaking like it's personal. She is a sabotage archetype who has an agenda,MONEY.
Did she lose a body part?
I’m a clinical scientist. Was Depp at this woman’s assessment?!!!!!!’
If not….a psychologist cannot comment professionally on a person who is not present who they have not directly evaluated. No psychologist would do this. That is diagnosis by proxy. It is considered scientific malpractice. Any clinical professional would be struck off by their professional body.
She also, speaks too much and overloads the listener with data. Uses excessive jargon. The jury likely won’t know what standard deviation is. Also speak clearly, why say symptomatology instead of just ‘symptoms’. She also uses terms I’ve never heard of. She’s also wrong on what a personality disorder is. It need not pervade all areas of life.
She is plain wrong on some basic facts given that I know the literature. She’s painting a biased picture. This lady can only be from a cheap back street practice.
She has a clear vendetta. Every profession has its bad seeds. She may well be biased due to trauma in her own childhood.
Either way I seriously smell a rat!!
Edit just read the term ambulance chaser. We don’t have that here in the UK. She looks at the jury with a furrowed brow. She’s not reporting the science she is trying to coherce. She communicates very poorly for a psychologist. Too intense. Too face on. Speaking about Depp as if he isn’t there is even bad practice. I would say she is 100% someone willing to say anything if the price is right. What a cold and depraved human.
Well said.
just curious. Do you think it was proper for Curry to diagnose AH with TWO personality disorders after meeting with her once and going through her papers?
Whats an ambulance chaser
@@Justin-fx9xu Allow me to reply. I think it's possible. I was diagnosed with clinical depression after a single session by a psychiatrist. However she did indeed evolve her treatment as how I responded to the medications and sessions with psychologist. Depression is no the same cluster as personality disorders, I know. However we can take into consideration that Dr Curry took extensive hours in spite spending face-to-face time with AH; reviewing papers/documents, testimonies, etc. Despite all that, we all have heard across the globe how doctors misdiagnosed people including within mental health disorders scope. So I'm thrilled for cross exam tomorrow
@@jjba3571 Ambulance-chasers are personal injury lawyers who reach out to people who were recently injured in an attempt to score a case. The fictional depiction of this practice involves a lawyer literally driving behind/following an ambulance (which is illegal in America).
The first time in this trial that compassion is visible on amber heard’s face, and it’s for herself.
PTSD is why Amber seems like she's acting when she's testifying. PTSD causes you to disconnect without even knowing it. It's the mind's way of protecting you until you're able to process the trauma. This woman has unparalleled experience and should be listened to. She's correct. I've lived it.
Also self reports and even collaborated to fill some forms lol absolutely laughable stuff
@@deathitself6985 Domestic violence is not laughable.
@@crystalparker100 Thats something we can agree on im glad the victim got justice in this case.
Also i said the self reports and collaborating with your patient is laughable if not pathetic when you know its related to a court case
@@deathitself6985 Just remember that a jury found OJ Simpson and Michael Jackson not guilty.
@@crystalparker100 Thats a wild comparison and yes a jury has sent alot of innocent men to prison aswell. Whats your point? The evidence was overwhelming her narrative was completely contradicted by everyone including 3rd party witnesses and audio recordings. She lied and got caught lying multiple times on the stand anyone who wants to do even the most minimal amount of research about her narrative about the events will quickly figure out just how much she lied and how she was the aggressor.
Psychologist couldn’t even remember anything without her “notes”. Literally the only person to take a stack of papers up there with them to have to read off of. Smh. Sooo many things wrong with her, what she said and how she acted… this whole thing was hard to listen to. I hope his attorneys don’t take it easy on her tomorrow.
Smh
That’s kinda nitpicky. If she handles multiple cases, the human brain can’t remember everything so it’s actually a good thing to bring notes. There’s so many other things to criticize besides referencing notes
Not true
@@TheDizzleHawke It’s her job as an expert to give her testimony based on her memory, not her reading her reports or notes. Otherwise they would just read expert notes in court
@@Takobella that’s not anyone’s job, silly. It’s unreasonable to expect anyone to have it all memorized.
I was shocked! This woman can literally tell who is guilty by listening to one side of a story. The mere fact that she offers training to judges etc should have the whole judicial system shook! With someone like this you don't need court or police she clearly has a crystal ball!
Ha! Unlike every armchair lawyer sharing their views in the comments of every social media platform right?
And her ‘scale’ is based on Heard’s warped, biased answers! Garbage in garbage out. Her testimony should be thrown out.🤢
@@MarkArnoldMusic haha point taken
She is not very smart
problem is Amber's attorneys say the same thing about Johnny's psychologist
so this is getting nowhere
why cant the court just hire *_independent_* psychologists to settle this once & for all
AH has everyone fooled, she plays such a victim, look how many times she glances at the judge to see if the judge feels pity for her, she doesn't fool me, the more she tries to destroy Johnny the more he will come back winning, we can see who is the liar!
"I've been a psychologist for over 25 years"
*"I think that's enough."*
I agree. She doesn’t have any credible evidence-she said so herself 😨!
This psychologist was so anxious to prove AH is innocent that she didn't realize she had taken the role of AH's attorneys. This certainly has gone well beyond her duty of giving AH psychological diagnosis. She was anxious, nervous and tried very possible mean to destroy JD. It made me suspect that she had a much bigger agenda than just does her job as a psychologist.
right I think she was paid off 👀
She really did come off as biased. Made her look so uncredible. It’s obvious to us. Let’s hope the jury can see through this.
It was AH lawyers that accused Dr. Curry of never being a expert if she didn’t agree with Depp.
Well, she can be passionate about her profession and about something she completely disagrees with. And she provided convincing proof why she disagrees with the previous doctor’s assessment, her scores were not elevated past 150% of the mean.
Oh she knew. It was deliberate. She was strategically used to enter pure HEARSAY into evidence for the jury, without Amber having to get on the stand.
And no one stopped her. Not the judge, not Depps team. They should have been jumping on their desks over that illegal BS.
Johnny's lawyers are going to have a field day discrediting this woman's assertion of events. A diagnosis that is purely speculative is something every single one of us at home can do, but a professional should know better.
Indeed. Pleased they had the evening to prepare the cross examination. So much to discredit.
She could not even answer without her notes.
I highly doubt that the tests amber answered, were answered honestly, bc this seems like she purposely tried to get the highest scores on PTSD to prove a point
Garbage in, garbage out. Her ‘chart’ is useless.🤢
@michaela naneva Also dr curry managed to avoid directly saying anybody did anything to anybody bc SHE DOESNT KNOW.. this psychologist loved to talk about everything johnny did to amber, she mustve been there!
Johnnys team is so smart to have hired Dr Curry. They really wanted someone squeaky clean, who could not be challenged in bias or credibility whatsoever and not only that but she is gorgeous and incredibly well spoken and professional throughout. Then you have this lifetime hallmark movies dollar tree defense psychologist on contrast.
I love that this Dr is the defense’s witness and yet AH’s attorney still screws up and calls her Dr Curry several times! Just shows that even her presence in the courtroom rattles that attorney! Lol DR CURRY FOR PRESIDENT!!
Making a diagnosis from a questionaire filled out by Amber is ridiculous. We all know we are capable of filling those things out to get the results we want conveyed to the professionals.
That's how the other one who was testifying for JP did too, lol. Do you know why? Because that's how ALL diagnosis are made!
That’s why they’re only ever used as a baseline to figure out which steps are next in testing usually. If treatment may be needed etc. especially since anyone whose ever taken stats which is necessary for most BA psychology degrees could tell you surveys are the most inaccurate form of data! So how are these even being considered as possibly valid? (ex: I could say on a self report that I’m depressed to get anti depressant meds but it doesn’t mean I’m actually depressed)
In college I was told most personality tests were not reliable
Exactly what I saw. One of her findings was based solely on 4 “checklists” completed by Amber. Ridiculous.
@@rileyscott5827 the earlier testimony was using a test designed to detect exaggeration as well. That's the part where a layperson wouldn't be able to fake authentic results easily.
I can’t take anything she says seriously. She lost me when she attempted to convince\brainwash the jury into thinking men are always the abusive one in the relationship 🙄 what a complete waste of time.
I agree. She said a lot of “he” “she” instead of “victim” and “perpetrator”.
@@nope.2284 Yes, but she often refers to JD as the abuser and AH as the victim. It's all based on what AH told her, not first hand knowledge. That's my impression anyway.
You people are coming into this with a bias. You don't think the doctor hired by Depp's legal team lied? "Did you discuss this case with your husband "? Response: "No." We're really supposed to believe a woman didn't tell her husband anything about the case or court, etc?? The psychologist hired by Depps team is snobby and sketchy. She did good as a witness for JD however in general she comes across as a rude snobby self righteous person and unprofessional.
@@nope.2284 Only at the beginning and when the lawyer asked her like she was leading her to say it those are the only times she agreed men can be victims
drug addicts at some point always guilt of violence. Facts
Where tf is she looking? Is she looking directly at the jury when the jury is not the one asking her questions?
The scale was elevated regarding her not being able to take fault, I’ve been saying she was playing victim all day.. thanks doc ah testimony was an insult to the jury’s intelligence after hearing all the recordings. she was this scared puppy? 😒 who was that mad woman they played in the evidence? No accountability whatsoever
Notice how attentive Ms. Heard is when they are talking about HER as a victim!!! She puts on that sad , poor me face! She is so transparent!!!
Sickening
What worries me the most is this shows that Ambushpoo legal team is willing to go any lengths including continuing to smear Depp. This ‘professional’ testimony should be striked. All Depps team is gotta ask certain questions to prove that she was watching trial online which You can clearly see - she did.
She’s sitting there looking like a scolded puppy. Its pathetic🙄
Sad face 😞?????? She looked to me that she wanted to go and couldn't find a bed to 💩in.
As a psychiatrist I know several things are true. 1. 90% of therapists and psychiatrists are not very good. 2. You can pay an “expert” to say anything you want in court.
Martin Edwin: Are you saying there is a 90% chance Dr. Curry is not very good?
@@davidgori4500 Yes probably but after seeing both experts testify it should be clear that they did not display the same level of professionalism at all
@@davidgori4500 That's not what they're saying. 90% isn't saying Dr. Curry isn't very good or all therapist and psychiatrist, it's just saying that the large majority of therapist and psychiatrist aren't always good.
How do you find a good one?
@@davidgori4500 what does common sense tell you?
I don't understand why she can just sit up there and spout off what Amber reported to her as fact, without being fully transparent that it's just Amber's allegations, and not actual proven fact.
I hope they both get the help that they need. Both of them are messed up and need some deep psychological healing.
She is approaching this from the position of a therapist, who will simply believe everything you self-report. Johnny's team should have a field day here.
They really do. My ex said his therapist diagnosed me, without ever meeting me. The therapist told him what he wanted to hear.
He's going to inn cross
She's disordered. They both are.
Therapy only works when you’re 100% truthful and if she actually has bpd like I do as long as all the other things dr. Curry said, then I think she’d find it extremely hard to put herself on blast because she’s narcissistic
Yes they do have to believe everything they say- at first; but after a while of knowing the person and continually hearing about their behavioral patterns and treating them in every area, they can begin to assess if the person is fabricating what's going on, or if they're being truthful- especially when they bring another person into the picture who is in close contact with the patient they're treating.
She is actively looking at the paper repeatedly. This testimony was entirely prompted.
Suuuure. Depp was destroyed here, truth hurts.
@@Simon-zo1vf Amber will never see you or know that you exist. So stop sucking up to her
@@riadhsyr4097 yeah same to you about Johnny.
@@Simon-zo1vf I've seen you in multiple comments desperately trying to defend Amber 💀
Disgusting human
@@Simon-zo1vf this woman is sat here trying to say there is no previous indicators to show a borderline personality disorder or history of violence. I am fairly certain her ex wife from before her marriage to Johnny would disagree given Amber was arrested for DV against her. The woman is unstable. She made calculated attempts to film and record in an effort to instigate. And every single attempt got nothing more than a verbal return to match her own BS. She makes people who have actually suffered DV and who aren't just seeking attention look like liars and idiots.
She also has a same trait as AH-staring at the jury as she talks 🙄🙄
Literally all you have to do, is think about how you'd feel having these two women as teachers. You would think of Dr Curry as the kind, well-educated, happy to help if you ask for help teacher, who you can go to about anything....whereas you'd think of old Dr Poos here as the teacher who'd never admit she's wrong when she is, and who you'd never want to give any indication to that you were having a problem, because she'd shout about it in front of the class then turn it round to being your fault
do u even know them personally ?you just assume who is bad or good
@BicBiro you're so right...I've had teachers both like this and I can totally feel the Karen vibes from Dr Hughes
@@AAA-kr7nh It's not just about an assumption...the body language and attitude of Dr Hughes is very hostile and unagreeable, whereas Dr Curry seems more stable and understanding. It's not about assumption, it's about analysis of actions.
@@randompenguwithayoutubeacc3047 Exactly. If anything she'd have all the reason to be more calm right now since she's on the team that's questioning her. People act like you can't see body language, attitude & tone that someone is nasty af as a person. The way you can tell in AH's videos that she's lying & making up stories about his violence towards her. Many people can spot them from the body language. It's not that hard.
The difference between 2 psychologists is remarkable. Dr Curry was reassuring, calm, down to earth, explaining in direct terms and unflappable. Dr Hughes was condescending, rude, patronising, browbeating directly at the jury, very angry every time she was interrupted, pulling faces at the judge and Depps team every objection, very impatient and dismissive. Lots of word salad to try and impress with her knowledge as if that is enough for anyone to believe. Obviously she believes everything she is told by what she considers a victim. As someone who has suffered from emotional instability and wanted to do something about it I would rather be seen by Dr Curry than someone who just tells me what I want to hear. I actually think Dr Hughes would benefit from some treatment herself for her traits that she shows here.
Absolutely!
I would'nt want to meet her in a dark alley.🥵
Yep. She's a typical lefties. Condescending and rude
She also talked about her educational background for 10mins to make the jury believe she was credible when all AH's lawyer focused on with Dr. Curry that she was not board certified. Manipulation at high level.
I couldn’t have said it better. I am shocked the hearsay with no medical records, that she could just slander JD so badly. It’s disgraceful. The events also do not match up with previous timeline. I hope she is owned tomorrow. It’s disgusting for real survivors.
The difference between this psychologist and Dr Curry is astounding. Dr Curry presented her findings calmly, without using emotive language, kept her tone neutral and was extremely careful to correct any statements which were incorrect or could be considered ambiguous, she was also very clear that her duty as an expert witness was to the fact finder in the case, not to Mr Depp or to Miss Heard.
This psychologist is using aggressive and accusatory language and a tone which I would never expect of a mental health expert because it's completely inappropriate and unprofessional.
This woman wishes she was Dr Curry.
She'd be better off bringing the muffins back up cuz this was pathetic Dr. Curry findings are playing right before our eyes in the court just look at Amber's reactions
She isn’t a psychologist. Just a psychopath like Amber Heard. Gosh I’ll never go to her. We all saw how Dr. Shannon Curry spoke. She was so clear and confident in whatever she was saying. This woman is blabbering lies without any evidence. Disgusting
I agree! 👍👍👍
This woman is exteemely robotic and consistent her entire disposition. Get woke or get clowned further by me.
I wasn't quite able to completely process the part where she mentions that there are a lot of things wrong in her testimony but there hasn't been time to correct them? Is that something usual?
Hughes's entire testimony was based on what Amber self-reported and appeared to be strongly biased in favor of Amber's, almost like she was simply trying to manipulate the jury to play on their emotional reactions to the offensive language by painting a picture for the jury of how JD was a terrible person.
Dr Hughes with 4 pages of notes:
"Let me just access my notes"
Dr Curry with 20 pages of notes:
"Let me just access my brain'
She isn’t a psychologist. Just a psychopath like Amber Heard. Gosh I’ll never go to her. We all saw how Dr. Shannon Curry spoke. She was so clear and confident in whatever she was saying. This woman is blabbering lies without any evidence. Disgusting
dr shannkn curry was amazing
Dr Shannon wrote a 25 analysis on miss heard. And I wish to God we could read the whole thing. It should be showed to jury. Does anyone know if it is?
@@chrisabshire82 They only get access to the transcripts from whatever Dr Curry said in her testimony.
EXACTLY! AND Dr.Curry wasn't even allowed to refer to her report!
I believe this video should be replayed in law school's classes as example for students about unpolished, unprofessional, biased and non credible testimony on cases like this.
The reality is, it's a very professional, objective, and honest testimony. It just doesn't fit with your biases.
@@budweiser600 there was nothing professional about this witness and how she was referring to allegations as if they were factual! This was a very biased supposed expert.
@@nataliemcmillan2605 more like a gossiper tbh
@@budweiser600 are you brain damaged?
@@budweiser600 Maybe her test and opinions were professional but the way she presented them in court wasn't.
She said Low level of violence, she lost me there. How does she know this?? must be paid by that woman because ain't no way
If AH wins this argument, that's it. I've lost faith in all humans. This would set an extremely bad precedent for the future where the wrong are right. And I'll be ashamed that this is the society we live in. That woman must pay, fully for all the miseries she caused Depp and ruining his career and his time. She used to be the worst actress i had ever seen on the screen. But at 9:58 , I was convinced. She's the best actress not only in Hollywood, but all the woods that are or were ever existent. She must be stripped of all honor and thrown into prison.
You can’t lose faith in humanity because of this snake. In fact, if anything my faith is renewed because of the overwhelming support I see someone getting that acknowledges that he is human and makes mistakes but was never a “thing” or “monster”.
Well ready to get lost all faith because she has a high chance of winning just based on her being a female and it involves domestic violence. Depp already lost one in UK..
Let’s be real they probably both hit each other. Neither’s an angel is all of this
Her passive aggressive “pffftchs” were really pitiful. I really hope the jury sees through her.
👍🏽
I wouldn't hold my breath, jury's are very carefully curated.
So, let me get this straight.....Amber’s greatest stressor was the title and how no one would believe her, yet she claims she didn’t write the title? This witness just exposed another of her LIES.
Hahaha
Yet she told Johnny no one would believe him to be a victim of domestic violence bc he is a male
Wow!!!!! EXCELLENT
Lol! Exactly!! Smelling corruption yet?
Hope his attorneys catched up on this!
I’m wondering how many eyes rolled when she looked through her notes 🤣
It’s sad to watch a therapist have such an angry deposition while also supporting and enabling an abuser….
It is extremely unethical to make conclusions about someone’s psychological state without actually interviewing them. It’s wild and insane all these things she is reported is based on Ms. Heard’s account alone, and being reported as fact. Can I go to this psychologist, tell her that the sky is green and red and that it rains star dust in my bedroom every night based solely on my account, and she will testify to it as if it’s fact? The gendered language is also wild, shows bias against male DV victims immediately. At least Dr. Curry interviewed both parties before making clinical decisions. Yes, this doctor has better credentials but Dr. Curry had better clinical practice and insight. I truly cannot wait for Depp’s attorney to tear this testimony apart.
Anddd THIS is how to lose your license.
Great comment! Dr. Curry is a complete professional.
Totally agree with you.
Need a lie detector here and test them upon both Johnny and Amber.
💯💯💯
Without her notes she cant remember anything. But when it goes to the "very bad Things" Depp do to Heard she can remember all without her notes. She is Lying and everbody can see it. Depps Laywers will destroy her today.
Notable differences between the two psychologists testimonies:
1. Dr Curry testified with neutral language within the boundaries of facts, findings and solid, evidence supported conclusions. A more solid, professional argument was provided by Dr Curry as a result for all her findings.
2. DR Curry did not use repeated gender bias in general or as subsequent backing to her findings. The gender bias was heavily used as argument in itself.
3. DR Hughes testifies as though her opinions drawn from her assessments are actually factual and references graphic scenarios as though they actually occurred. Shows strong personal bias.
4. DR Hughes repeatedly justifies the toxic patterns of behaviour by Amber and altogether dismisses what suffering Johnny clearly had to endure as though it holds no weight. This discredits her professional clinical judgment as an objective practitioner.
Good analysis. I completely agree.
I agree 100%. Well put.
As despicable as it is, there will most likely be demand for professional liars. No matter how unfounded her testimony is, the fact is she's able to provide something in such a clear cut case and not get objected out of there. Hopefully people like this can be reprimanded before further damage.
W comment
💯
Approaching my practicum now, the notion that a psychologist in any regard would state that events took place is frankly unbelievable. This psychologist is in the radical line of affirmation therapy, if you are paying for therapy or psychiatric care believe me when I tell you to run as fast as you possibly can and seek better treatment. They will tell you what you want to hear, diagnose you in the most positive frame or in such a way that you get to absolve yourself with victimhood, and affirm you into an early psychological grave that you frankly are unlikely ever to recover from.
Also as an aside, the testing she used was at best unsophisticated and at worst intentional malpractice.
13 minutes of my life down the drain listening to this woman's BS - I'm just sorry for the people involved in the trial.
🤔🤔🤔🤔 Why did Amber's lawyer allow her doctor to look at her paperwork...but REFUSED to allow the other doctor to look at her paperwork. 🙄
because it's Heard's witness. The same reason Depp's team is not going to treat Heard's witnesses like they treated their own.
Yes they allowed her to do it once and then she ran with it and kept doing it. Finally she was told about it. Most of why she was saying was hearsay. She had nothing to back up what she said. Then we have to finish watching her testify tomorrow morning 😠
@@Gwen0902 can’t wait to see JD team destroying her.
Gwen E but tomorrow morning is cross and it will be fun to watch depps lawyers grill her
Johnny's doctor didn't need to look she was a professional. Not at all like Amber's doc.
So unprofessional, reporting something she was told, as if it was a fact. Reading reports by other people who had reported what was told to them by AH, as if they were proven facts. The majority of her examination with AH was over Zoom, so has no idea who was coaching AH off camera.
This!!! Yes, totally agreed! Why isn't she saying things like I have formed my professional opinions on the basis of...then insert some actual scientific facts and research based on scientific and peer approved methods? You hit the nail on the head.
They need someone to call HEARSAY! Lol
@@stephaniejongeling2969 I think the reading doesn't have any problem cuz more professional for me they don't have to memorize for each clients background. 😉 that's my opinion I'mnot with AH at all. She's a lier girl!!!!!
If Dr Curry wasn’t a psychologist she could’ve definitely been a lawyer ❤️
Funny how nice Amber’s attorney is now when she isn’t interrogating JD’s defence for fake info but now she’s such a “delight” to these bs stories for AH
This was the strangest expert testimony I’ve ever seen, and I’ve been a litigator over two decades. I can hardly wait until cross.
Can you explain why it was strange? I have no experience with courts this is the first time I am listening/watching anything like this and I find it fascinating
I'm a Psychologist and completely weirded out by this Psychologists' unethical behavior on the stand. She is using definitive language.
@@gumija literally read the next 2 comments lol
@@lesliemint1378 yes, same. I was wondering if it’s a forensics psychology thing or if it’s a court setting thing and settled on just completely unacceptable…
@@lesliemint1378 is it a specializing in DV/IPV thing? because there is very specific language used for DV/IPV advocacy which this psychologist seems to specialize and be heavily immersed in.
those who’ve suffered DV/IPV get better treatment from those trained about DV/IPV than with other psychologists or therapists who do CBT, talk therapy, or general trauma therapies.
There’s a different protocol and approach for DV/IPV advocacy and treatment because of how complex it is with that interpersonal dynamic and escalated outer threat.
I'm a psychologist and this lady needs to return to university! where are the psychological evaluations of JD? She can't assume something without more investigation. I have never seen someone SO unprofessional. When one of your parents is an abuser, you will relate with the victim OR the abuser. This psychologist didn't even take a personality disorder to Amber.
Is 29 hours even enough to know anything about a person? Doesnt seem alot.
My understanding is Amber being evaluated is because she states PTSD as part of her complaint. JD isn’t using that as part of his so therefore they are not able to evaluate him for this lawsuit. It’s not relevant.
Honestly this woman needs to be thoroughly investigated her own self and licenses potentially revoked. She looks like a very sketchy character.
She’s unbelievably biased.
@@maryjeter8490 That is exavtly the point, that is why she shouldn't testified on Johnny.
Shameful this women is even allowed to testify in this way.
BROOOO, seriously from the lawyers down to the psychologist... They are so poorly prepared. It seems like they wanna help Depp not Heard lol
She didn’t forget to talk about what AH said about Johnny but forgot everything else… she kept reading… why is this ok?! She was lost without the script
Biggest red flag 🚩
Johnny made her $?!t on his side of the bed…it’s his fault. 🥴
she keeps looking sideways as well she's weird.
@@TheRealRenn 😂😂😂😂
that's good then for cross examination tomorrow 😏
As someone who has been a victim of domestic violence multiple times, this shouldn't have been allowed it's disgusting. My ex would tell the same things to professionals, friends and family. Demonise me, make me look terrible. That's what narcissists do, they always victimise themselves and slander their partner to cover up that they themselves are the abuser to keep their perfect image. How is that slander allowed to present in a court room as facts from an "expert". What a joke.
I agree with you wholeheartedly as my husband does the same to me. It's frustrating and upsetting. I really hope Amber doesn't get away with this.
She’s either getting paid a really nice sum or she’s been played. Amber does not have PTSD. This woman is a dingbat.
They are allowing her to implode. Depp's team will not stop the train wreck.
@@gwenreader6631 more like a demon in human form if you ask me🤷🏿♀️
They had to let her talk so they could let her hang herself. Notice at one point she claims “it would require a pervasive pattern” and that they had “no evidence of it before or after”…. Except heard was already found guilty of DV with her ex. That’s a pattern and she gave cross examination the perfect length of rope to hang her with tomorrow.
The way amber pouts & looks in the camera I can’t 🤣🤣🤣
And this lady never ever met Johnny depp ever in person and made a report on him loool
What scares me is how this so called expert has apparently testified in other cases, because I suspect she has gone on the stand and testified that DV occurred when it may not have done. She seems to be a hired gun who will testify whatever you want her to testify.
I thought the same thing--what other true victims of DV have been done wrong because of this crazy woman.
now you know why there are so many wrongfully convicted in united state
Dr. Hughes was the most unprofessional "doctor" I've ever seen in a court room. She stated every opinion of hers and her colleagues that favored Heard as verifiable fact and with an odd anti-male feel to all of it, basically on more than one occasion excusing Heards actions, even violent ones, simply because she was female, and Depp was male. I turned it on partially into her testimony not knowing who she was, and I honestly thought it was perhaps Heard's mother or like a close family friend who was just blindly defending her loved one and believing everything she said. Many times, she stated things as if she was there, as if she had witnessed it first-hand...when it was all just what Heard had told her or other psychologists. I was really surprised the judge let it go on without some kind of warning to Heard's legal counsel or to Dr. Hughes herself.
I find the nurse was the most creditable person. She kept notes on her visits. And referred to them because that was the moment in time when all this occurred. So you can't change what was written at the visit... moment in time
Have you seen many doctors on the stand? Do you work in the legal system? Or are you talking about watching some RUclips clips occasional?
@@roems6396 well it doesn't take a genius to know you're not supposed to include your opinion in a psychological evaluation ..
@@nicelaknowles8382
You beat me to it...
what I can say is....that's the main reason why she is on her Amber's witness....they can lie for Amber, who would not?! coz they will be paid by J.D's hard earned money.... the person they are destroying...so sickening. Well one thing I can say the money Amber got from J.D did not made her happy still coz is she did she won't be too desperate to do crazy things she have done to a person whose's mistake was to fall in love with her.
Dr Dawn Hughes needs to be investigated, peer reviewed, and fired from any Boards she is part of.
I would be shocked if the judge herself does not understand that this psychologist is completely biased. Truly, I would be.
She’s using crib notes to cheat on the stand? The judge letting her do this needs to be replaced. She’s biased. This witness is a clown 🤡.
No this is good.. the judge is trying to make sure that, there won't be any reasons for a mistrial, or appeal.. she's giving some leeway, and Johnny's team is allowing it, because they can tomorrow point attention to ALL the issues of what she said.. 🤭 going to be interesting 🤣
And Dr. Curry is sitting in the courtroom and can help give things for them to ask her or point out.. like bias.. they have the entire evening to prepare for cross 😝
@@Goddess4moon Yup!!! whole night to prepare for tomorrow and totally grill her. I believe queen Dr. Shannon will also come back
@@Goddess4moon The cross examination is going to be very interesting this time around.
Just wait until they get to cross and won't allow her to refer to her notes!!
Since this psychologist brought up having been aware of a.h.'s previous relationships, the prosecution can bring them up now, INCLUDING a.h.'s previous DV charge. Please let this happen. Her history should now be shown to the jury.
I think you should bring this to Depp's team attention. Sometimes during this trial they seem like they let a lot of things slide.
No professional I’ve ever worked with would ever speak with this level of certainty because they acknowledge that these things are left to interpretation, bias, etc. And especially that she bars her finding only on self reporting and never interviewing other people involved. This is crazy!
She was looking down again judge!! She put her glasses back on.
Half this women’s testimony was hearsay, why weren’t his lawyers objecting?
I wondered that…there was a lot of hearsay 🥰
they are smart.... they let her dig the whole ground and they are gonna use that dirt to bury her tomorrow. Can't wait...
"Never Interfere With an Enemy While He’s in the Process of Destroying Himself"- Napoleon Bonaparte
The more she says the more they can cross exam her. And they will! justice for JD.
They're letting her dig herself in a hole, tomorrow JD's attorneys will question her and Oh Boy she has a lot of explaining to do.
No facts. JD has facts and evidence to back him.
I’m most deeply disturbed by her credentials, experience background, her APA positions and roles. As someone in the field, her highly respected board certified status and participation in APA work groups scares me. How the heck are regular folks supposed to trust anyone in our field if someone so vetted behaves so unethically unprofessionally and biased. She’s taking so many of the right things that are true and turning them into something they’re not. Ugh!
She's an assistant professor. Not super high rank.
100% Malena.
Welcome to the VA!
I’m curious how she is biased on test results and background context of her childhood. Asking for a professional point of view, not unprofessional feedback.
This is exactly right. I was about to post and will, that this is a huge reason why so many do not and will not take these tests seriously and give them any validity. I’ve had the experience that you can take the same situation with the same facts and two psychologists and you can get a split in opinions and who is diagnosed with what.
Five hundred dollars per hour. This woman wasn't testifying, she was giving them their money's worth.
Her staring at the jury makes me uncomfortable
Why is she speaking to the jury. When the lawyer ask her something she answers to the jury. It makes me uncomfortable