What’s most upsetting is that this young woman didnt have one knowledgeable adult in her life to tell her not to sue the manager. Idk how long ago this happened but darling, go to your state’s corporate business website and type in the business name in the search bar. Open the articles of organization and you will find the owner’s name and address. Sue THAT person.
I’m sure the business is a plc . It’s terrible business practice to take money out of an employees check without evidence . Shady . I feel sorry for her
This show demonstrates episode after episode that many people DO NOT have at least one knowledgeable person in their lives to guide them regarding basic consumer law and the importance of keeping written record of business transactions.
Maybe she sued the manager cause he's the one who took it out her ✔️ she said she couldn't find the office to the payroll department, and they got paid in cash
Yes it is what kind of business let anybody handle the money why do they need a manager then he don't open,close ,handle money,call police be the owner sound crooked ,👀
I believe the owner was responsible for crooky and shady business went down in that store and the manager and owner can come to the store via the back or side entrance.
I don’t know. It sounds like the company was operating illegally. I think I’d try to dig and see if the company was actually set up correctly to have protection under an llc or corporation. If it was not I’d report the owner and sue him personally. I’d report him to the U.S. Department of Labor for failure to pay earnings. I’d also report him to the Attorney General of my State. At the most I’d get my money. At the least he’d regret pulling that stunt on me.
@@geoffJG1 I don't subscribe to the Talmud or kabbalah. Only the Torah/1611KJV. if you believe in the Bible or the prophecies of the prophets you would know the real jews are not the ones in Israel right now. They never went into captivity by ships and sold at the four corners of the earth to their enemies. There is suppose to be peace in the land when the true Israelites are there so why is there constant conflict and war? Who were the people in Spain and Portugal during the inquisition? Who did most of the native Americans claim to be? Who was the God of the earliest slaves in America? What did the Roman catholic church say and feel about negroes? What did the Roman Catholic church and k k k have in common? What was the first church of free blacks called in America? .... Exactly!
The damn manager himself could have taken the money, how do they magically decide it MUST be the lady? I think that the owner was on hard times and made up this crap with the manager to have an excuse to keep 450 knowing they were already knee deep in debt already.
Seriously for 450 and not the thousands they had in business accounts. All a plan to steal this one lady’s money? Nah more than likely the owner was on a power trip and took her money because he thought she stole
How do we know the defendant/store manager didn't take the $450 - twice - once from the store and again from her. She said she was paid in cash with no pay stub in the envelope. He could have taken it - both times. Also, the person who closed the store the previous night could have taken it, as was pointed out. Even the other employee who came in that morning with the plaintiff , perhaps when the plaintiff went to the donut shop. Maybe she ate the donut at the shop or on the way back. For that matter, the owners of the business could have taken it as a frame-up if they wanted to discharge the plaintiff for some other reason. I believe the plaintiff. I don't think she would be going to all this trouble to sue if she had stolen the money. If she were guilty, it's more likely that she would want the whole thing to go away. That company NEEDS to be out of business; doesn't sound like anybody knows what they're doing.
I bet the owner shut down his stores because he was shady and doing illegal crap. No safe? No cameras where money is kept? Wth? I felt bad for her. That look on her face when she realized she was losing this case 😢
You can't legally doc an employees check without their consent. even for theft doesn't matter that is even a bigger crime than an employee theft of $450.
@@sharonlewis3979 what no that is not how it works especially for theft only the court can make her pay. Now a place can ask you either we dock your pay or call the cops. But there is no waiver you sign for that it would be voided in any court, because that would interfere with the judicial process.
@@ReymundoCortez no it wouldn’t 😐 I’ve worked in retail most my life and that’s always how it’s been. If your register comes up short then that’s on you and your pay to replace it. If you break an item in the store it comes outta your pay. If you give a discount that wasn’t authorized then it comes out of your pay. What you’re talking about doesn’t even make sense… you know how long it would take for businesses to recoup their losses if they had to do what you stated ? Why would a company pay you your regular pay check when you stole something from them ? lol that don’t even make sense
The "entrepreneurs" that run Corporates branches are some of the shadiest people i've ever known.. They know exactly what they're doing and know how to avoid liability. I knew a guy that would open up a branch, run it for a few years, close it down, change companies, open up a new branch, etc.. He was the shadiest guy i've ever met.
The same god who gave us cancer, autoimmune disorders, prion diseases, and watches and does nothing when police shoot black people and women get raped? Your god even admits that's he's evil: Isaiah 45:7 King James Version 7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and *create evil:* I the Lord do all these things.
This actually happened to my team when I was in my early twenties and worked at a popular shoe store. Right before they went bankrupt, they sent an investigative team to our location and accused us of nonsense. It’s interesting that he closed his locations after money goes “missing” and that the mode of payment was inconsistent.
This is exactly why when I was cashier and it was time for me to go I refused to leave. I stayed until the draw was done being counted and deposited into the safe. And I made sure they paid me until that was done.
That she was gone for awhile .. while On company time that was close by and didn’t bring anything back.. but besides that it really doesn’t matter she is suing the wrong the person .
People go to court seeking justice, but instead find the law. The owner should be sued. You're not exempt from accountability just because you close up your unprofessional business.
@@benjie128 so if you and I work for a company that you do not own, I can Sue you for something the company did if the company closes down? I’m surprised you even replied.
Pain & suffering is also determined by anxiety & fear. But I really wish people know this prior to filing a court case. Pain & suffering is physical, HOWEVER, that’s after an accident or crime. It’s not for stupid crap like ‘I was inconvenienced’, ‘they made me mad’, ‘they said lies about me’, etc Edit: Not just this case, but the rest of the cases.
@@MrsBryant1024 I agree with you, but I thought she held her own regarding the theft. I can’t imagine the struggle of losing your job for theft as an hourly employee. I was fired because of my district having a high shortage percentage. It was my responsibility. Not my fault. I am educated and confident and I was stunned and struggled to think on my feet.
According to the law of responsibility, key holders assume charge in the absence of officials. In other words, if the manager fails to open the door, but you do open the door, then you are presumed to be in charge and responsible for all matter of business until someone from management arrives and relieves you of the responsibility.
The store manager could have taken it and frame her. Girl this was a waste of your time filing this lawsuit. By the simple fact she's not allowing you to explain anything. I'm a firm believer you can catch a person in a lie by listen to what they have to say, she has already made her decision! lol
What are you not understanding .. she is suing the wrong person. Just because she is a black female and u want to defend her doesn’t make it right. She would very likely win her lawsuit .. if she sued the RIGHT person
I don’t necessarily believe that. What better way to try and look innocent than by suing. Not saying she did it. Obviously they can’t say who did and her pay should not have been docked without proof but it doesn’t prove innocence.
I just can’t get over the fact that she left and went to Dunkin Donuts and came back empty handed 😶 🤷🏽♀️ maybe they both were in cahoots and because she lost her job this lawsuit is in retaliation against him… Her story about the theft just doesn’t make sense and she glossed over the fact that she left… didn’t even explain that! 👀
@@eurydicespell4046 yeah I thought about that but he said she opened the store and then left shortly after… what company do you know that allows an employee that early of a break while on the clock… and you’ve also left the premises 🤦🏾♀️ it’s legit suspicious that she would leave right after opening up the store AFTER being in a room with the money and no camera 🤷🏽♀️
Working in retail a lot of employees walk in and out at random times. I’ve had a lot of my managers at the retail store I worked it would open it so we could come in, and leave to get breakfast or we’d do the samething so her story isn’t surprising. Just because she didn’t come back with anything doesn’t mean she never had it, plenty of people just eat in the car or before they get back.
Ok, I’ll play the Devils advocate. What if the manager stole the money in the morning when he got there and blamed it on her? Is this possible? YES! Because it happened to me many times while working midnight shift at a gas station. The manager would come to work in the morning and count the receipt money in his office. I was always $10, $15, or $20 short and the deducted it from my paycheck. I complained to corporate headquarters. They sent a corporate representative out and he worked the midnight shift with me and HE deposited all the money in the safe. Every time there was $100 in the till it went into the safe. I didn’t touch the money. He drove to a restaurant before the manager came in. Then about 30 minutes later he showed up pretending he was just arriving to check on the station. He asked the manager how the night receipts were. The manager replied, oh he was $20 short. The manager got fired on the spot and I ended up getting all my money back that they had deducted from my pay check.
No but they can always look it up. I'm sure if this thing happens at Walmart they would have a way to find out stuff like that. I've never heard of any corporation that's doesn't have documents or info on the corporate office. @@thecheshirecat299
The interesting thing here would be to see how long she had been working there along with the one that counted the money down for the deposit. Here is where it gets interesting. Since the plaintiff was there to open - Seems to me she used that time to her advantage to both take money out of the deposit and hide it as well using the DD as the excuse to leave the store. IF she knew she wanted to go to DD she could have done that before you entered the store to open it up. The dead giveaway would be - She knew the deposit was still there from the night before and she honestly had no reason to go near it. Knowing there was a camera in place to document her going to the room where there are no cameras in place that can show how long she was back there. If she honestly wanted to clear her name she shouldn't have left the store before another manager came knowing she was the only one with the deposit still there in the store along with the fact she was in the room with it. The employee that counted the money for the deposit and placed it in the drawer would seem to be in the clear just because there is documentation of her counting it and the time it took to place it there. If indeed it was short or stolen at that point - it would have been discovered the next day by the manager. Which we both know did not happen. ( He got there late ) Clearly there is room for an exploit of the camera not being in place and all we have to go by is the timing of who goes into the room with the deposit. It seems to come down to who is most likely to have removed the funds. If both were suspected WHY did only one employee get fired? I would have loved to see the video of the deposit and the video of deposits being made at other times along with the day she was there to open the store and left for DD.
I use to work for them and yes the business was always sketchy we had to drive to another state to pick up everybody checks and they never really came on time. I had to tell them that they were making me pay my car payment late every week and I have to pay extra fees. My manager was lazy and when they had a meeting she would just stay away from the store my last day was when she held our checks for her to just be hanging out at home.
Yeah, there’s a couple holes in her statement. If she left to go to Dunkin Donuts, why would she return with no food. And even if the manager is sometimes late, the person who closes at night can’t magically guess when he’s going to be late. So if they stole it, they would be the prime suspect. Now, it is possible that the other worker who was there with her did it, but her taking so much time, leaving the store, and then returning with no food makes her look the most suspicious. She definitely can’t sue the manager though. She’d have to sue the company. The fact that they had an open box and no cameras in the back was a terrible business practice, though, and I’m not surprised they are out of business.
@@deshanaewilliams2464 Except they say the place is across the parking lot. I have a hard time believing you can finish a Dunkin Donuts meal when the place is less than a block away. It does depend on what she got, though.
@@mistyk.2152 True, but they say the place is across the parking lot. Probably in the same strip mall. It’s hard to believe she got something to eat & drink, and finished it in such a short walk, didn’t have any trash, etc.
@@UmohowetYelayu he even said the other employee was on camera and was in the back for like 5 “seconds” opposed to her being in the back for 5 to 10 “minutes” and then she promptly left and returned empty handed 👀 sis probably thought about doing this all those other times he was late and finally took her opportunity 😂 🤷🏽♀️
I kinda understand what she was saying: the nite girl counted the money on camera, when behind the doors, no camera, wrote $800 on deposit, then took the 450 out. (Could have happened). The plaintiff comes in the morning, not knowing its short. But the question should have been asked: how much was in the opening deposit? It could have been anyone bc there wasn't a lock.
That’s what she was saying, but the judge is saying it doesn’t make sense that the closing employee would do that. Under normal circumstances, that would make the closing employee the prime suspect. The closing employee couldn’t foresee that the manager would be late the next morning, so why would she steal knowing that she’d be caught?
Initially, I thought that the defendant stole the money. In my career in retail loss prevention, I have had to show up at 3 am to count deposits left in a safe, wait for a store manager to count the deposit and when it didn't match, we would have the manager arrested. There are managers who will either through financial hardships or just want to get rid of someone, blame missing money on them. However... after hearing that the plaintiff was in the backroom for 5-10 minutes and then left the property, it made me think she did it.
One time I quit from a low-end job. The manager deducted $200 from my paycheck for my "uniform" (a hat and a t shirt) that I never brought back to the store. I should have sued the company LOL!!!
Something is not right!!! Anytime you file for unemployment and they cannot verify the company, the company is not on the right side of the U.S. law. Also, another red flag is there are cameras only in the front of the store and none in the back, where the money is thrown in a regular old drawer. One would think that a legitimate business would have cameras everywhere where money is stored AND that it would be kept more securely in a *S-A-F-E.* I think she sued the mgr. because he's the only one she can find. I do not believe she stole anything. I truly do believe she is a victim, in this case.
He is think really she steal the money.. its like a game for him. They didn't call the police...its a big thing steal money..its ruining her reputation without proof..maybe it's him who steal the money
Alarms went off with her. She was cornered and HAD to sue otherwise it would be admitting guilt. "...but he wasn't always on time" - yes, but the other employee still couldn't predict what was going to happen the next day and she would've been in handcuffs! No, GUILTY and justice was served indirectly. She'll never see that extra $450. It was all a very risky waste of time. By the way the Judge saying "you should tell the boss we need a safe" made me laugh. Most bosses today don't want to buy paperclips! :)
Many companies when you fired, they usually supposed to cash you out, or write a check then and there so you don't have to deal with them anymore or mail the last check
She stole it, and hoped the other girl would get blamed. She knew a lot about the cameras and didn’t mind providing a motive as to why “somebody else” took it. Before she walked off you could tell she knew she was guilty
Maybe she ate her dunking donuts in the car like most people do. If you don't have evidence that she took it. You can't blame her. He said out of his own mouth it was two people in the store. When she left it was still someone in the store. So I would of took 225 from her and 225 from the other person.
The only strange this is why she would start her shift, go in the back room where she has no need to go, and then go to DD. Surely she should have gone to DD before her shift started. I don't understand why there were not more questions about the DD trip. I would be curioud to hear her explain it.
What they did taking her money is totally illegal. It's not legal to take deductions like that even IF she stole it. She needs to file a state/federal wage claim
This judge just like to talk talk talk talk! Her mouth is like a machine gun! Before you can complete your sentence she'a already asking you another question, just so annoying!
That supervisor could have stole the money and said she stole it. He could have known the company was going down. Or either she knew there was no camera so there was no proof of her stealing the money, but why would she have the balls to sue that guy with that guilty conscience if she stole the money?
I worked at a cash only BBQ restaurant that was hit or miss with the food. There was no button for refunds because the manager didn't want refunds done. Since I was the cashier I was told on 2 occasions the register was short and it was suspicious. What the manager didn't know was that his assistant manager would just give people cash refunds without writing anything down. When informed of it the conversation immediately shut down before he could even accuse me.
I used to work at a Burger King as a young adult. We had a manager who, when doing skims, would grab a handful of money WITHOUT COUNTING IT. He would then enter a GUESS for how much he skimmed in the register. He often chewed people out because their register did not match, BEFORE counting the money at the end of the night, and finding out the totals actually matched.
If you ask me there are three potential suspects. The closing employee, who could've easily counted the total within the camera's view, then swiped 450 and put it in the deposit box; the plaintiff could've went back there, grabbed it, then left to hide it then went back; or the manager who could've thought he'd have the perfect alibi by showing up late then claiming the deposit was short.
I don't think the closing employee would have stolen it, because she knew she would be the only suspect. She thought the manager was going to come in early & get the money, so if it was short it would all be on her. I think it was either the plaintiff (who conveniently did not mention that she came in that morning, saw that the manager was late, spent 10 minutes in the back with the money, then left out the back door...which is really suspicious), or it could be the manager himself, like you pointed out, which would make him really scummy.
What’s most upsetting is that this young woman didnt have one knowledgeable adult in her life to tell her not to sue the manager. Idk how long ago this happened but darling, go to your state’s corporate business website and type in the business name in the search bar. Open the articles of organization and you will find the owner’s name and address. Sue THAT person.
I’m sure the business is a plc . It’s terrible business practice to take money out of an employees check without evidence . Shady . I feel sorry for her
This show demonstrates episode after episode that many people DO NOT have at least one knowledgeable person in their lives to guide them regarding basic consumer law and the importance of keeping written record of business transactions.
And if she cannot find their name or evidence of that business registration…. She has an even bigger fish to catch.
She said the business didn’t exist anymore
Maybe she sued the manager cause he's the one who took it out her ✔️ she said she couldn't find the office to the payroll department, and they got paid in cash
It's too bad the company closed down. You can't dock somebody's pay based on suspicion. You need evidence!!
Exactly. They had 0 proof she stole it. If she had stolen it, she wouldn't have tried to sue.
I did not expect him to sound like that...
Ikr! 🙊
I was looking down eating chips heard that voice expecting to see a young lady and then NOPE I WAS DEAD WRONG
I don't think it's "his" natural voice...me too, I was looking around like "who's talking 🤔?
Me either lol
i was looking for this comment lol
As a former store/ general manager of retail stores, I have to say there are too many opportunities to rip off that deposit by anyone.
Yes it is what kind of business let anybody handle the money why do they need a manager then he don't open,close ,handle money,call police be the owner sound crooked ,👀
That part. Having worked in a grocery store cash office, I was gobsmacked when they described the drop drawer.
I believe the owner was responsible for crooky and shady business went down in that store and the manager and owner can come to the store via the back or side entrance.
Yes!
How much did you get?
I think she tried to sue the company but they disappeared so this was her last resort.
She’s and idiot then because the owners name is public record and it would have only took zoom research to find him
Makes you wonder why they closed? Who knows, maybe it was the owner that stole it?
I don’t know. It sounds like the company was operating illegally. I think I’d try to dig and see if the company was actually set up correctly to have protection under an llc or corporation. If it was not I’d report the owner and sue him personally. I’d report him to the U.S. Department of Labor for failure to pay earnings. I’d also report him to the Attorney General of my State. At the most I’d get my money. At the least he’d regret pulling that stunt on me.
How many times do you think the defendant has been at a drive-thru and been told "thank you ma'am drive around"😂😂😂😂😂
What a gorgeous young lady. Wish her the best.
You're right; Israelite women are the best looking women!
The defendant or the plaintiff?
@@L.A.M.B4 Israelite you don't know the Torah, Talmud or Kabbalah you Phillistine fake Hebrew apostate.
She is a cutie pie!
@@geoffJG1 I don't subscribe to the Talmud or kabbalah. Only the Torah/1611KJV. if you believe in the Bible or the prophecies of the prophets you would know the real jews are not the ones in Israel right now. They never went into captivity by ships and sold at the four corners of the earth to their enemies. There is suppose to be peace in the land when the true Israelites are there so why is there constant conflict and war? Who were the people in Spain and Portugal during the inquisition? Who did most of the native Americans claim to be? Who was the God of the earliest slaves in America? What did the Roman catholic church say and feel about negroes? What did the Roman Catholic church and k k k have in common? What was the first church of free blacks called in America? .... Exactly!
No one told her it was wrong to sue him instead of the company and owner?
Right. She didn’t consult anyone? Someone should have advised her when she filed. Before the show? Waste of everyone’s time.
I know right? Kinda sad
Some will still say she is right .. and it will be those that look like her .. just check the comments
@@thecheshirecat299 ????
@@thecheshirecat299 you racist
The damn manager himself could have taken the money, how do they magically decide it MUST be the lady? I think that the owner was on hard times and made up this crap with the manager to have an excuse to keep 450 knowing they were already knee deep in debt already.
They set her up to fire her.
Seriously for 450 and not the thousands they had in business accounts. All a plan to steal this one lady’s money? Nah more than likely the owner was on a power trip and took her money because he thought she stole
Ive known her for a long time she such a sweetheart and Does not steal smh
Your friend is FINE AS HELL!!
She's so cute. She got a man?
It looks like big pimpin probably took it. Allegedly.
Tell your friend i said wasssup lol
Jfc all these people hitting on your gf.
Sorry this happened to her. She totally got F’ed by Kricket and whoever stole the $$ had a party.
How do we know the defendant/store manager didn't take the $450 - twice - once from the store and again from her. She said she was paid in cash with no pay stub in the envelope. He could have taken it - both times. Also, the person who closed the store the previous night could have taken it, as was pointed out. Even the other employee who came in that morning with the plaintiff , perhaps when the plaintiff went to the donut shop. Maybe she ate the donut at the shop or on the way back. For that matter, the owners of the business could have taken it as a frame-up if they wanted to discharge the plaintiff for some other reason. I believe the plaintiff. I don't think she would be going to all this trouble to sue if she had stolen the money. If she were guilty, it's more likely that she would want the whole thing to go away. That company NEEDS to be out of business; doesn't sound like anybody knows what they're doing.
How do we know the OWNER didn’t enter the store and take the money after turning cameras for a moment b4 shutting DOWN his stores....
It could have been him trying to blame her
The manager probably knew they were going to close soon and stole the money.
how do we know she didn't steal the money?
@@GeorgiaWhisper good point then he says she didnt come back with DD so what he probably knew where all the cameras point shots were SMH
I bet the owner shut down his stores because he was shady and doing illegal crap. No safe? No cameras where money is kept? Wth? I felt bad for her. That look on her face when she realized she was losing this case 😢
Right, sounds a little sus don't it... 😅
Every business should alway's have cameras in the back rooms. That's where most of the shady thing's tend to happen.
*always
*things
Especially when employees know there is no camera on that money drawer in back. Whoever took it did so knowing they cant prove it.
That's also where cake-clapping happens.
@@brdobie Thanks mom
@@DarkReapersGrim1 🤣
You can't legally doc an employees check without their consent. even for theft doesn't matter that is even a bigger crime than an employee theft of $450.
You sign that during the application process
Most people don’t read the small print
@@sharonlewis3979 nope.
@@sharonlewis3979 what no that is not how it works especially for theft only the court can make her pay. Now a place can ask you either we dock your pay or call the cops. But there is no waiver you sign for that it would be voided in any court, because that would interfere with the judicial process.
@@ReymundoCortez no it wouldn’t 😐 I’ve worked in retail most my life and that’s always how it’s been. If your register comes up short then that’s on you and your pay to replace it. If you break an item in the store it comes outta your pay. If you give a discount that wasn’t authorized then it comes out of your pay. What you’re talking about doesn’t even make sense… you know how long it would take for businesses to recoup their losses if they had to do what you stated ? Why would a company pay you your regular pay check when you stole something from them ? lol that don’t even make sense
I really hope she didn't steal the money😒, and on that basis, 🥰I really hope she does go and sue the owner of the franchise. God Bless 🙏🏾✝
The "entrepreneurs" that run Corporates branches are some of the shadiest people i've ever known.. They know exactly what they're doing and know how to avoid liability. I knew a guy that would open up a branch, run it for a few years, close it down, change companies, open up a new branch, etc.. He was the shadiest guy i've ever met.
I don't think she stole it.
she better sue cricket wireless.
@@quebochinche7086 Yes
The same god who gave us cancer, autoimmune disorders, prion diseases, and watches and does nothing when police shoot black people and women get raped?
Your god even admits that's he's evil:
Isaiah 45:7
King James Version
7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and *create evil:* I the Lord do all these things.
This actually happened to my team when I was in my early twenties and worked at a popular shoe store. Right before they went bankrupt, they sent an investigative team to our location and accused us of nonsense. It’s interesting that he closed his locations after money goes “missing” and that the mode of payment was inconsistent.
Why didn't she get the owner name and sue them.
I wouldn’t of known that too she doesn’t work for the law.
@@alexlol4160 ignorance of the law is not an excuse . Just can’t sue anyone
This case made no sense! She should’ve sued the owner of the business
Exactly!
😍
exactly i greed with you
Some people don't understand how the legal system truly works
Well she appears to be very young. I'm surprised nobody with some life experience didn't explain that to her.
His voice completely threw me off....
Yeah a lil Kevin Hart letmeexplain-ish.
😂
I wasn’t looking at first and thought it was a woman 🙄
Kind of got that Gary Coleman thing going on 😀😀
Right! 🤣 I took my earbuds out, thought a coworker was talking to me
Shes gorgeous! I hope she got all this sorted out
Lies!
How does he know "it was only the big bills that were missing" if he never saw the deposit?
Usually, they have to write down the bills when counting the money.... 4- $100's, 6- $20's, and so on, on a transaction slip
And it’s on video too.
This is exactly why when I was cashier and it was time for me to go I refused to leave. I stayed until the draw was done being counted and deposited into the safe. And I made sure they paid me until that was done.
What's suspicious about going to a donut store and not coming back with anything ...if they don't have my favorites...I'm out of there
That she was gone for awhile .. while
On company time that was close by and didn’t bring anything back.. but besides that it really doesn’t matter she is suing the wrong the person .
She took that money
She didn't go to Dunkin Doughnuts. She went to hide the cash in her car. She's a pretty thief.
Why no one is realizing that u can eat at dunkins…
@@MikeNelli-uq2wl 😮
People go to court seeking justice, but instead find the law. The owner should be sued. You're not exempt from accountability just because you close up your unprofessional business.
I’m the manager. I’m just the manager. I don’t have or take any responsibility. I’m useless really
How you suing a member of staff and not the company you worked for?.
Because the company was shady and shut down.
@@benjie128 so if you and I work for a company that you do not own, I can Sue you for something the company did if the company closes down? I’m surprised you even replied.
She tried but the address was not valid......
@@Jeustar I understand that, but the person she sued was an employee, not the owner.
Because she doesn’t understand how business and life works. All people know is the word “lawsuit”. They can’t think beyond the word.
Sis said she gonna conjure 🧙🍵, gather, or whatever it takes to get her evidence together. I Stan a thorough scammer. This franchisee is shady.
Pain & suffering is also determined by anxiety & fear. But I really wish people know this prior to filing a court case. Pain & suffering is physical, HOWEVER, that’s after an accident or crime. It’s not for stupid crap like ‘I was inconvenienced’, ‘they made me mad’, ‘they said lies about me’, etc
Edit: Not just this case, but the rest of the cases.
Very intelligent well spoken young woman.
How well spoken was Jordan Belfort ? And he stole damn near a billion .
She's well spoken? @8:04 She says she's "conjuring" up her evidence 🙄 which isn't even a damn word? But, you say she's well spoken??? Umm, okay 👌 lol
@@MrsBryant1024 I agree with you, but I thought she held her own regarding the theft. I can’t imagine the struggle of losing your job for theft as an hourly employee.
I was fired because of my district having a high shortage percentage. It was my responsibility. Not my fault.
I am educated and confident and I was stunned and struggled to think on my feet.
All she have to do is find out who the owner is and sue him
According to the law of responsibility, key holders assume charge in the absence of officials.
In other words, if the manager fails to open the door, but you do open the door, then you are presumed to be in charge and responsible for all matter of business until someone from management arrives and relieves you of the responsibility.
The store manager could have taken it and frame her. Girl this was a waste of your time filing this lawsuit. By the simple fact she's not allowing you to explain anything. I'm a firm believer you can catch a person in a lie by listen to what they have to say, she has already made her decision! lol
What are you not understanding .. she is suing the wrong person. Just because she is a black female and u want to defend her doesn’t make it right. She would very likely win her lawsuit .. if she sued the RIGHT person
@@thecheshirecat299 wtf does being a black female have to do with her being defended? This person never mentioned her race ONCE in this comment
@@cecelove2821 that’s the only reason they defending them. I promise u the original poster is black
@@thecheshirecat299 okay racist
When someone steals from a company ..they don't turn around and Sue that company... she's innocent
I would be blasting the other employee..seems she could hv but because no cameras..no proof🤷♀️
I don’t necessarily believe that. What better way to try and look innocent than by suing. Not saying she did it. Obviously they can’t say who did and her pay should not have been docked without proof but it doesn’t prove innocence.
I just can’t get over the fact that she left and went to Dunkin Donuts and came back empty handed 😶 🤷🏽♀️ maybe they both were in cahoots and because she lost her job this lawsuit is in retaliation against him… Her story about the theft just doesn’t make sense and she glossed over the fact that she left… didn’t even explain that! 👀
Let me play the devils advocate...MAYBE SHE AT HER FOOD THERE FOR A BREAK INSTEAD OF BRINGING FOOD BACK!!
?Ate lol
@@eurydicespell4046 yeah I thought about that but he said she opened the store and then left shortly after… what company do you know that allows an employee that early of a break while on the clock… and you’ve also left the premises 🤦🏾♀️ it’s legit suspicious that she would leave right after opening up the store AFTER being in a room with the money and no camera 🤷🏽♀️
I don't think she is explained why she left the store to the judge. Millian used to be on top of her game but she missed that point.
Working in retail a lot of employees walk in and out at random times. I’ve had a lot of my managers at the retail store I worked it would open it so we could come in, and leave to get breakfast or we’d do the samething so her story isn’t surprising. Just because she didn’t come back with anything doesn’t mean she never had it, plenty of people just eat in the car or before they get back.
I’m glad she called him out saying he’s not a good manager. I would be heated if I was accused of stealing that’s not right
Ok, I’ll play the Devils advocate. What if the manager stole the money in the morning when he got there and blamed it on her? Is this possible? YES! Because it happened to me many times while working midnight shift at a gas station. The manager would come to work in the morning and count the receipt money in his office. I was always $10, $15, or $20 short and the deducted it from my paycheck. I complained to corporate headquarters. They sent a corporate representative out and he worked the midnight shift with me and HE deposited all the money in the safe. Every time there was $100 in the till it went into the safe. I didn’t touch the money. He drove to a restaurant before the manager came in. Then about 30 minutes later he showed up pretending he was just arriving to check on the station. He asked the manager how the night receipts were. The manager replied, oh he was $20 short. The manager got fired on the spot and I ended up getting all my money back that they had deducted from my pay check.
That was a very satisfying story!! Yay! I'm happy for you. What a creep he was, ugh!
S Mobile sounds kinda shady. The manager doesn’t even know where this place is.
Exactly!
He’s the manage of one location.. not the head quarters . U think all
The managers at Walmart know the address where corporate is located ?
No but they can always look it up. I'm sure if this thing happens at Walmart they would have a way to find out stuff like that. I've never heard of any corporation that's doesn't have documents or info on the corporate office. @@thecheshirecat299
I don’t think she stole it I would have investigated the other stores to see if the owners did anything shady. For them to close down so abruptly.
I don't think she stole it either
It doesn’t matter if she stole it or not. She is suing the wrong the person.. and u think the business shut down all of it stores over $450?
@@thecheshirecat299 no idiot not over that. I think the owner was being shady to other businesses.
She is sooooo gorgeous.
She is not bad looking but the blonde girl behind her actually caught my eye!
@@chrisconstantin4584 I saw her too. Both are gorgeous though.
Yes the plaintiff is gorgeous.
Black is beautiful.
Conjure up 🤣 I love it. Maybe the spirit's she conjures up will guide her to sue the right person 🤣
Maybe she meant exactly what she said.
It also means to bring to mind certain memories.
The interesting thing here would be to see how long she had been working there along with the one that counted the money down for the deposit.
Here is where it gets interesting.
Since the plaintiff was there to open - Seems to me she used that time to her advantage to both take money out of the deposit and hide it as well using the DD as the excuse to leave the store.
IF she knew she wanted to go to DD she could have done that before you entered the store to open it up.
The dead giveaway would be - She knew the deposit was still there from the night before and she honestly had no reason to go near it. Knowing there was a camera in place to document her going to the room where there are no cameras in place that can show how long she was back there.
If she honestly wanted to clear her name she shouldn't have left the store before another manager came knowing she was the only one with the deposit still there in the store along with the fact she was in the room with it.
The employee that counted the money for the deposit and placed it in the drawer would seem to be in the clear just because there is documentation of her counting it and the time it took to place it there.
If indeed it was short or stolen at that point - it would have been discovered the next day by the manager.
Which we both know did not happen. ( He got there late )
Clearly there is room for an exploit of the camera not being in place and all we have to go by is the timing of who goes into the room with the deposit.
It seems to come down to who is most likely to have removed the funds.
If both were suspected WHY did only one employee get fired?
I would have loved to see the video of the deposit and the video of deposits being made at other times along with the day she was there to open the store and left for DD.
I use to work for them and yes the business was always sketchy we had to drive to another state to pick up everybody checks and they never really came on time. I had to tell them that they were making me pay my car payment late every week and I have to pay extra fees. My manager was lazy and when they had a meeting she would just stay away from the store my last day was when she held our checks for her to just be hanging out at home.
Why did this even make it to people's court
Agreed waste of time.
Exactly
Yeah, there’s a couple holes in her statement. If she left to go to Dunkin Donuts, why would she return with no food. And even if the manager is sometimes late, the person who closes at night can’t magically guess when he’s going to be late. So if they stole it, they would be the prime suspect. Now, it is possible that the other worker who was there with her did it, but her taking so much time, leaving the store, and then returning with no food makes her look the most suspicious. She definitely can’t sue the manager though. She’d have to sue the company. The fact that they had an open box and no cameras in the back was a terrible business practice, though, and I’m not surprised they are out of business.
You can eat it on the way back .
There’s never any food left by the time I get back from Dunkin’ just for me. Everything they sell is one handed food you can eat and drive.
@@deshanaewilliams2464 Except they say the place is across the parking lot. I have a hard time believing you can finish a Dunkin Donuts meal when the place is less than a block away. It does depend on what she got, though.
@@mistyk.2152 True, but they say the place is across the parking lot. Probably in the same strip mall. It’s hard to believe she got something to eat & drink, and finished it in such a short walk, didn’t have any trash, etc.
@@UmohowetYelayu he even said the other employee was on camera and was in the back for like 5 “seconds” opposed to her being in the back for 5 to 10 “minutes” and then she promptly left and returned empty handed 👀 sis probably thought about doing this all those other times he was late and finally took her opportunity 😂 🤷🏽♀️
The guy sounds like a stud …
Biggest secret: We are all considered "companies". If you know this rule life gets clearer.
This poor girl ain’t no one tell her she’s suing the wrong person? Where her mom dad auntie uncle brother sister friend no one gave her advice?
Wow. Sis didn't know she had to sue the company and not the manager/supervisor for her money? This generation coming up really is clueless. 🙄
sad, but true.
Right and can she prove she didn't take it
She tried to sue but the address from her paycheck is not valid so that's why she sued the manager
Yea but it’s pretty obvious you can’t sue the manager fir something like this.
@@deanwinchestersgirl8767 She doesn't have to prove her innocence (that's the default position), the employer has to prove her guilt.
That's a shame! I feel badly for her!
Me too
I feel bad for him
I know she lost but the plaintiff is so pretty 😍😍😍
She knew way to much about the security cameras and the walk out to the store and got nothing. That’s fishy too.
I kinda understand what she was saying: the nite girl counted the money on camera, when behind the doors, no camera, wrote $800 on deposit, then took the 450 out. (Could have happened). The plaintiff comes in the morning, not knowing its short. But the question should have been asked: how much was in the opening deposit? It could have been anyone bc there wasn't a lock.
I would go a step further and say he did it. He was late and there were two employees there already that he could put it off on.
That’s what she was saying, but the judge is saying it doesn’t make sense that the closing employee would do that. Under normal circumstances, that would make the closing employee the prime suspect. The closing employee couldn’t foresee that the manager would be late the next morning, so why would she steal knowing that she’d be caught?
You weren't following what the judge said. That scenario immediately incriminates the night cashier.
It sooooo could have happened....when short manager should have been called ASAP to avoid this
@@MelissaRae1975 yeah, I was surprised at the judge: she's usually on point about those things.
Initially, I thought that the defendant stole the money. In my career in retail loss prevention, I have had to show up at 3 am to count deposits left in a safe, wait for a store manager to count the deposit and when it didn't match, we would have the manager arrested. There are managers who will either through financial hardships or just want to get rid of someone, blame missing money on them. However... after hearing that the plaintiff was in the backroom for 5-10 minutes and then left the property, it made me think she did it.
File with the local Department of Labor. That’s the right entity when a business has closed. They collect a $1MM payroll bond in most states.
LISTENING HOW SHE TALK ABOUT THE CAMERA LOCATION… SHE DID IT!
One time I quit from a low-end job. The manager deducted $200 from my paycheck for my "uniform" (a hat and a t shirt) that I never brought back to the store. I should have sued the company LOL!!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You could've also complained to your state's labor department
If you didn't bring back the uniform, that is theft, so they had every right to make you pay for it...
@@arianefr78 not 200 dollars
I can tell you first hand the Texas Labor commission doesn't play. They're a tad bit slow due to covid but they investigate and act fast.
You call them slow AND fast in the same sentence.
@@brdobie I Said they're a tad bit slow now only due to the covid. Other than a Pandemic they act swiftly...hopefully you understand now.
The managers voice caught me off guard 😳
In California, you go to the labor department with paycheck disputes...it's a different court.
Young lady should be an attorney! Go to law school!!
Not if she didn’t know u can’t sue an employee
@@thecheshirecat299 she’s young she’ll learn the law.
This guy at the end that interviews gets me on my nerves with his snappy and antagonistic comments.
That’s the best part! lol
Something is not right!!! Anytime you file for unemployment and they cannot verify the company, the company is not on the right side of the U.S. law. Also, another red flag is there are cameras only in the front of the store and none in the back, where the money is thrown in a regular old drawer. One would think that a legitimate business would have cameras everywhere where money is stored AND that it would be kept more securely in a *S-A-F-E.*
I think she sued the mgr. because he's the only one she can find. I do not believe she stole anything. I truly do believe she is a victim, in this case.
Judge Milian STOP ASKING QUESTIONS YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWERS TOO 😠
Exactly cutting ppl TF off
She so took it !! Went to DD I don't think so ..where's the donuts you would have bought 🤣🤣🤣
If she had stolen the money, would she be sueing them? I'm suspicious, when he was giving testimony she was smiling.
.
He’s smiling because he knows he has no responsibility ..
Anybody could've taken that money. From the person who closed the night before to the other employee who supposedly went in the back for just 5secs
Defendant is wearing a cross, he's guilty of the theft in some way
She's so adorable maybe there's a modeling contract in her future that will more than make-up for the $450.00 she lost here 💯
Watch out she’ll steal your heart !
@@danieltucker632 It wasn't proven she stole anything! 💯
@@robbbietheim2096 it was a joke lol... but it wasn’t proven she didn’t take it either .
@@danieltucker632 😂😂I knew that
Damn nobody told her before hand that she had to sue the company...this was a total waste of her time🤦
Idk why it bothers me when someone says supposebly when it's pronounced supposedly
I been in a similar situation and it was extremely hard to sue because the business shut down and didn't know the owners real name.
He is think really she steal the money.. its like a game for him. They didn't call the police...its a big thing steal money..its ruining her reputation without proof..maybe it's him who steal the money
Chile. His voice…that’s all I got 🥴
😂😂😂
Trans man on hormone therapy (if you're wondering).
This is unnecessary.
Listen!!! I wasn't looking when he first started speaking and was shocked when I looked up😳
🛑😀😆😄😁😂😅
She's pretty.😊
Alarms went off with her. She was cornered and HAD to sue otherwise it would be admitting guilt. "...but he wasn't always on time" - yes, but the other employee still couldn't predict what was going to happen the next day and she would've been in handcuffs! No, GUILTY and justice was served indirectly. She'll never see that extra $450. It was all a very risky waste of time. By the way the Judge saying "you should tell the boss we need a safe" made me laugh. Most bosses today don't want to buy paperclips! :)
Many companies when you fired, they usually supposed to cash you out, or write a check then and there so you don't have to deal with them anymore or mail the last check
i wish the judge let people finish answering the a question!!!!!!!
She stole it, and hoped the other girl would get blamed.
She knew a lot about the cameras and didn’t mind providing a motive as to why “somebody else” took it.
Before she walked off you could tell she knew she was guilty
All of them could! I would be so mad if I was accused, I would call police! I would make a scene 😅
First words out of the plaintiffs mouth were, "supposedly, supposedly, accusations".... lol I bet she did take it
Maybe she ate her dunking donuts in the car like most people do. If you don't have evidence that she took it. You can't blame her. He said out of his own mouth it was two people in the store. When she left it was still someone in the store. So I would of took 225 from her and 225 from the other person.
or she ate at Dunkin Donuts before coming in.
The only strange this is why she would start her shift, go in the back room where she has no need to go, and then go to DD. Surely she should have gone to DD before her shift started. I don't understand why there were not more questions about the DD trip. I would be curioud to hear her explain it.
I like how the judge explained that
Seems very convenient that he was late that morning.
DAMN... Let the girl talk please. Let her answer before you interrupt again and again and again.
What they did taking her money is totally illegal. It's not legal to take deductions like that even IF she stole it.
She needs to file a state/federal wage claim
This company is probably a shady scam. They probably hired hundreds of employees, gave them irregular pays and closed down.
I'm thinking the business owner is shady
God bless everyone on here❤🐦
This owner and company sounds real fishy and scammy with the way they did business.
She's a Beautiful young lady Eye Don't Believe she stole anything dude is a clown 🤡 and doesn't have good management skills at All 😂
😆
Because she looks good to you she’s not a thief 😬 okay
@@CHICAGOBULLrc Vibe HIGH have a Great Day
You can’t just blame somebody for some bs and tack it on then without evidence.
This judge just like to talk talk talk talk! Her mouth is like a machine gun! Before you can complete your sentence she'a already asking you another question, just so annoying!
Why watch then?
@@SparDanger Because I am free to do so and to say to you FU!
That supervisor could have stole the money and said she stole it. He could have known the company was going down. Or either she knew there was no camera so there was no proof of her stealing the money, but why would she have the balls to sue that guy with that guilty conscience if she stole the money?
I worked at a cash only BBQ restaurant that was hit or miss with the food. There was no button for refunds because the manager didn't want refunds done. Since I was the cashier I was told on 2 occasions the register was short and it was suspicious. What the manager didn't know was that his assistant manager would just give people cash refunds without writing anything down. When informed of it the conversation immediately shut down before he could even accuse me.
Store manager sounded like he had not hit puberty yet!
She’s after the wrong person instead of the company !! Dumb move !! Sis not smart 😃😃😃😃
“ conjure up my evridence “ 🤣😂🤣
I used to work at a Burger King as a young adult.
We had a manager who, when doing skims, would grab a handful of money WITHOUT COUNTING IT. He would then enter a GUESS for how much he skimmed in the register. He often chewed people out because their register did not match, BEFORE counting the money at the end of the night, and finding out the totals actually matched.
If you ask me there are three potential suspects. The closing employee, who could've easily counted the total within the camera's view, then swiped 450 and put it in the deposit box; the plaintiff could've went back there, grabbed it, then left to hide it then went back; or the manager who could've thought he'd have the perfect alibi by showing up late then claiming the deposit was short.
I don't think the closing employee would have stolen it, because she knew she would be the only suspect. She thought the manager was going to come in early & get the money, so if it was short it would all be on her.
I think it was either the plaintiff (who conveniently did not mention that she came in that morning, saw that the manager was late, spent 10 minutes in the back with the money, then left out the back door...which is really suspicious), or it could be the manager himself, like you pointed out, which would make him really scummy.