I wish they'dput some sort of handle on the back to help assist adjusting the monitor, my oled monitor is insane but adjusting is feels wrong cause theyre so thin.
Pricing seems a little off compared to the competition that’s out at the moment offering similar specs. Guess people are going to buy it and Sony know what they’re doing compared to me 😂
@@starlingspm4872 probably the Asus man. I feel like they spent more time on their design. The Sony one feels like they rushed it out just cause the ROG one was making a name in the 1440p high refresh rate scene
it's pretty much the same panel (LG's MLA WOLED with anti-glare matte coating) so the experience shouldn't be very different, but the Sony M10S has DP2.1 which is good for future-proofing
may be check other brands 27 inch qhd 480hz oled monitor price first😅 ppl really think Sony need to earn back the 400 million in 8 years meanwhile their mobile phone department cost way more money?
Being an OLED, VRR with G-sync, 27in, 480hz the price isn't really that high consider comparing other monitor prices with an equal amount of features and specifications. They also have a cheaper model that's an LED but can do 4k at 144hz if you prefer.
@@MrFreedomHD When they list Displayport 2.1 as a feature they are forgoing that the exact reason anyone would actually by this monitor is missing. There are multiple tiers of Displayport and HDMI bandwidths. DP 1.4, for example, had HBR 1-3 which are the tiers of bandwidth. HBR 3 was the highest bandwidth version of cable and port that DP 1.4 could provide. For DP 2.1 there are 3 tiers as well named: UHBR10, UHBR13.5 and UHBR20. UHBR20 indicates that each lane through the cable and port can transfer 20 gbps adding up to a total of 80 gbps. The lower the tier the lower the bandwidth. Sony listed DP 2.1 as one of their features omitting the fact that DP 2.1 isn't being used to its full potential in its marketing material. Lack of UHBR20 (80gbps) is bad because anything lower and it is not possible to run this monitor at its full speed without using DSC which locks you out of some GPU driver features and causes the slightly irritating issue of black screens while switching tabs. People also make relatively long term investments into their monitors so future proofing is needed and without UHBR20 people will be forced into using DSC years down the line even though it would not be necessary when GPUs supporting DP 2.1 UHBR20 exist on the common market. Also controversially, some people claim that DSC is visually lossless despite that being nothing but a baseless marketing term used by VESA. DSC does reduce image quality and it can causes many other issues too. Samsung displays (and now some of the newer monitors using DSC) have had issues with scanlines and all sorts of funky problems that don't exist in the vast majority of monitors that do not use DSC. I would say: If you are in the market for a new monitor wait until a monitor supporting DP 2.1 UHBR20 releases to make a purchase. At the very least it is wiser to avoid things like DSC for the sake of peace of mind.
1.4a: 32.40 Gbit/s, maximum frequency at 10 bit is 205 Hz for 1440p. 2.1: (UHBR10 used on this monitor): 40.00 Gbit/s , maximum frequency at 10 bit is 293 Hz for 1440p. So, not fake. Fake is HBR3, which is the same 32 Gbit as DP 1.4a. Anyway, DSC will make it easy for 480 Hz and visually lossless.
@@oversemper It also causes lots of issues with incompatible driver settings, long blank screens when alt-tabbing and there are problems like weird scanline issues and all sorts of color errors that appear on malfunctioning screens with DSC. Issues that never really appeared on screens without DSC.
why not coming cheaper version.. most of us using mid end PC doesnt need 480hz OLED. can even PS5 running 480 Hz if some user prefer 27" monitor instead TV
480 vs 144hz frame by frame comparison is genius, I can finally show something to some trolls insisting anything abobe 60hz is useless
Trying to find out whether the panel is qd oled or woled
woled
No 480hz QD OLED yet exists in this world.
@@oversemper it does the Asus rog dual mode monitor has qd oled.
@@sherwinmathew179 which model exactly?
@@sherwinmathew179that isn’t a qd oled check again
does this atleast work with ps5 pro to get 120hz?
Hello thank you Sony I loved.itis god so so amazing.
I’ll take two please Sony! Looks great 😊
that'll be 2200, thank you for your purchase
will there be same design like this but for 32 inch 4K oled?
I wish they'dput some sort of handle on the back to help assist adjusting the monitor, my oled monitor is insane but adjusting is feels wrong cause theyre so thin.
Glossy or matte ?
Matte
Pricing seems a little off compared to the competition that’s out at the moment offering similar specs.
Guess people are going to buy it and Sony know what they’re doing compared to me 😂
1:19 "Bottom position" 😭😭😭
You have brain rot.
W reliable Sony
My next baby monitor XD
This or the ROG PG27AQDP?
It all comes down to price. Which will be cheaper?
@@grimdicer152 nope. It all comes down to quality lol
@@GhosTigreI’m on the same boat which one will you pick?
@@starlingspm4872 probably the Asus man. I feel like they spent more time on their design. The Sony one feels like they rushed it out just cause the ROG one was making a name in the 1440p high refresh rate scene
it's pretty much the same panel (LG's MLA WOLED with anti-glare matte coating) so the experience shouldn't be very different, but the Sony M10S has DP2.1 which is good for future-proofing
DISPLAYPORT 2.1 FINALLY!!!!
Nope. Its advertised like that but you only get 40gbps max. Hdmi 2.1 has more bandwidth than that.
Release date ?
It's available for purchase but be warned it isn't full bandwidth DP 2.1. It's bandwidth is actually less than HDMI 2.1.
October
Wow
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
That DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR10 is useless. 40Gbps is nowhere near enough for 1440p 480Hz without DSC.
Glossy or Matte ?
Matte
@@MSayeed
🤮
unfortunately matte
1349€? Seems like this monitor got the Concorde tax too😂 Ridiculous pricing🤡
may be check other brands 27 inch qhd 480hz oled monitor price first😅 ppl really think Sony need to earn back the 400 million in 8 years meanwhile their mobile phone department cost way more money?
@@feihongtan3125asus one is 1170€
Being an OLED, VRR with G-sync, 27in, 480hz the price isn't really that high consider comparing other monitor prices with an equal amount of features and specifications. They also have a cheaper model that's an LED but can do 4k at 144hz if you prefer.
Brokie
SONY always late.. that why this good quality company always as loseser..
Shut up and take my money
1440p? With such a beast of a monitor why not 4k?
@@AntonioKH2 true but can it run doom
You guys didint include an hdmi 2.1 cable with this monitor. Crazy high price to put in just a cheap DP. Smh
1440p is not enough for a 27". PPI is way to low.
L Sony. Fake DP 2.1 doesn't support full UHBR20 80gbps bandwidth.
Can you explain that to me brother? i’m trying to understand :)
@@MrFreedomHD When they list Displayport 2.1 as a feature they are forgoing that the exact reason anyone would actually by this monitor is missing.
There are multiple tiers of Displayport and HDMI bandwidths. DP 1.4, for example, had HBR 1-3 which are the tiers of bandwidth. HBR 3 was the highest bandwidth version of cable and port that DP 1.4 could provide.
For DP 2.1 there are 3 tiers as well named: UHBR10, UHBR13.5 and UHBR20. UHBR20 indicates that each lane through the cable and port can transfer 20 gbps adding up to a total of 80 gbps. The lower the tier the lower the bandwidth.
Sony listed DP 2.1 as one of their features omitting the fact that DP 2.1 isn't being used to its full potential in its marketing material.
Lack of UHBR20 (80gbps) is bad because anything lower and it is not possible to run this monitor at its full speed without using DSC which locks you out of some GPU driver features and causes the slightly irritating issue of black screens while switching tabs. People also make relatively long term investments into their monitors so future proofing is needed and without UHBR20 people will be forced into using DSC years down the line even though it would not be necessary when GPUs supporting DP 2.1 UHBR20 exist on the common market.
Also controversially, some people claim that DSC is visually lossless despite that being nothing but a baseless marketing term used by VESA. DSC does reduce image quality and it can causes many other issues too. Samsung displays (and now some of the newer monitors using DSC) have had issues with scanlines and all sorts of funky problems that don't exist in the vast majority of monitors that do not use DSC.
I would say: If you are in the market for a new monitor wait until a monitor supporting DP 2.1 UHBR20 releases to make a purchase. At the very least it is wiser to avoid things like DSC for the sake of peace of mind.
1.4a: 32.40 Gbit/s, maximum frequency at 10 bit is 205 Hz for 1440p.
2.1: (UHBR10 used on this monitor): 40.00 Gbit/s , maximum frequency at 10 bit is 293 Hz for 1440p.
So, not fake. Fake is HBR3, which is the same 32 Gbit as DP 1.4a. Anyway, DSC will make it easy for 480 Hz and visually lossless.
@@oversemper DSC is not visually losless. That is a marketing term.
@@oversemper It also causes lots of issues with incompatible driver settings, long blank screens when alt-tabbing and there are problems like weird scanline issues and all sorts of color errors that appear on malfunctioning screens with DSC. Issues that never really appeared on screens without DSC.
Apex legends do not even reach 480 fps lol, max is 299, useless
why not coming cheaper version.. most of us using mid end PC doesnt need 480hz OLED. can even PS5 running 480 Hz if some user prefer 27" monitor instead TV
Because it costs the same price for LG & Samsung to make the 480Hz panels vs the 120Hz panels.
There is the M9 LED model which does 4k at 144hz which is $799.99 USD
then go find another monitor bruh, you can get last gen LG panels at a cheaper price (27GS93QE, XG27AQDMG, these are 27" 240Hz WOLED MLA panels)
$9999?
Crazy spec, ugly design
wait until you see how ugly the ROG version is
Ugly design? My guy this design is one of the best I seen. Especially the monitor stand. Not some alien ship looking like garbage that rog has
@@PahEz ROG is ugly too but the spec is too good of a trade-off, this has a big bunda bro for an oled