Great pointers there John. Good job. My order of mods for racing pro ATV mx is: 1. Width (A-arms and axle) 2. Suspension (revalve or upgrade) and 3. Motor
@@johnbruzzi4381 Yes, a revalve can do wonders for suspension, especially back in my day when there weren't many aftermarket shocks available. Nowadays replacement is pretty much the only option. Stock shocks even revalved can't compare to a set of Elkas.
The extra lift of an aftermarket cam is really not going to work like it should without porting Yes you can throw a cam in but I think you're a little backwards in the order to do these upgrades It's best to do the pipe first because if you do the intake the carburetor the cam porting all that other stuff you've still left the bike choked right down by the stock pipe Yes you can take the stock baffle out of the stock pipe I didn't hear you talk about that
I totally get it’s none of our business as viewers, but are you thinking about ever linking back up with Michael Sabo?? Love those older vids of you guys battling it out on the 400’s and the other shit too. Just bummed I don’t see yall kick together anymore
One of the upgrades for the carburetor is to go to the Lectron smart carburetor there's also the SC2 which is smart carburetor too they use a metering rod instead of jets
You must not be too well versed in the dirt bike ATV world Lectron carburetors are used quite often especially people that go up and down in elevation I know a few people that run them on their banshees
@@johnbruzzi4381 a lot of people don't use them because of the very expensive price I know people that run them on banshees CR250 CR500 snowmobiles side-by-sides I probably know a 15 people at least that are using them either the SC2 or the Lectron
Unplugging the TPS does not move it to a higher ignition map or anything look it up there's a 2D and a 3D map The 2D map just uses RPM as it's base 2 advanced timing a 3D map uses RPM as well as throttle position sensor to make a 3D timing map Yes it starts a little easier with the TPS connected but I haven't had any issues running the 2D or the 3D timing map It's just important when starting it with the TPS still connected you don't hit the throttle that's what kills the starting components on these bikes I fix hundreds of bikes so trust me I know these things
I did look it up and got great information from very reputable sources. The cdi does not make its own timing map based on throttle position and rpm. These 2 maps are preset locked in and have no variation in them because theres no other information being input to the cdi for it to be able to calculate anything different based off of things like air temperature, coolant temperature and such. The only reason it starts easier is because the timing is a few degrees retarded on the 1st map otherwise this wouldnt be the case because nothing else changes. This is a common issue with 2 strokes also when advancing the timing on a plate they become harder to start because of the timing advance. It absolutely will not hurt the bike to leave the tps unplugged on a carbureted bike, it will just stay in the advanced timing map. Different story on efi but the trx was never efi from the factory. The only way you can change the ignition timing within the map is to have a programmable unit installed and make your own. Stock cdi is super basic its just 2 simple timing curves.
@@StupidFastJohn it doesn't make its own map but the position in the map that it uses the 3D map gets its inputs from the TPS and the throttle position whereas the 2D map only gets its input from crank position It's like an EFI map it can use different parts of the map depending on the inputs
@@StupidFastJohn it uses the pickup on the stator as a crank position it has to know a crank position in order to fire it's not like a crank position in a car but the pickup on the stator is what is used as a crank position sensor
The 2D table clearly has 2-dimensions, the 1st being the RPM, the second being the associated value. The limitation of this type of tuning is that the tune is static - it has no adaptability. If you are over ~66% throttle, then the DME uses this table, and it doesn't care about actual load. So, for example, if you are at 4000rpm, and 0psi of boost, your ignition timing is ~19°BTDC. And if you are at the same RPM, but 15psi of boost, your ignition is exactly the same: ~19°BTDC. Obviously the load on the motor is not the same for these two situations, so the ignition timing should be different, but it isn't.solution is to change the engine-management strategy to use 3-dimensions.Now the ignition timing is no longer purely dictated by RPM. With the additional axis of load, we can adjust to the dynamic-load nature of a turbocharged vehicle. Using our example from earlier: 4000rpm and 0psi of boost, the ignition timing dictated is ~42°BTDC. And at 4000rpm and 15psi of boost the ignition timing is ~23.2°BTDC. That is a huge change from the static 2-D table in the first example.The added dimension should be immediately obvious. The 1st dimension is LOAD; the second dimension is RPM; the third dimension is the associated value.Now the ignition timing is no longer purely dictated by RPM. With the additional axis of load, we can adjust to the dynamic-load nature of a turbocharged vehicle. Using our example from earlier: 4000rpm and 0psi of boost, the ignition timing dictated is ~42°BTDC. And at 4000rpm and 15psi of boost the ignition timing is ~23.2°BTDC. That is a huge change from the static 2-D table in the first example. The addition of the 3rd-axis provides much better control and adaptability to changing engine loads and rpms. The end-result is a smoother, more linear power delivery, with multiple "secondary effects" such as economy, emissions, safety, ect.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Great pointers there John. Good job. My order of mods for racing pro ATV mx is: 1. Width (A-arms and axle) 2. Suspension (revalve or upgrade) and 3. Motor
@@F5Tornado44 revalves for a pro rider idk about that guy
@@johnbruzzi4381 Yes, a revalve can do wonders for suspension, especially back in my day when there weren't many aftermarket shocks available. Nowadays replacement is pretty much the only option. Stock shocks even revalved can't compare to a set of Elkas.
Great video brother!
but if I pierce my carburetor by 3mm do you think it's too big or should 3mm put a port
Great video man nice quad
if I want to put a 41mm carburetor I do you need to have a porting
@@Cedrick_lessard14 no but porting would def make it better 🤙
@@StupidFastJohnok tanks
@@StupidFastJohn but if I pierce my 3mm carburetor, do you think it's too big or would it be better to put a porting at 3mm?
Would love to see a ltr 450 on the channel!
Yoooo John my Trx is spitting oil from the crankcase breather hose what can it be I have no idea I’ve been asking and getting no answers
Is it overfull? If the vent on the valve cover free of dirt and debris? The crankcase air has to vent from somewhere!
Can ya make some trx content? I just bought a 05 the content on them just isn’t there all 450er stuff
Can't wait to see what going on ur yfz . Im doing a yfz lt250r motor swap
Turbo blaster updates?? You cant start the project and not finish it...
Agreed
These things take time, i always circle back to them bro. Its just fine tuning now, the hard parts been done 🤙
thank you man, video was helpful
Great video! Great order.
thank you brother your video was very helpful
The extra lift of an aftermarket cam is really not going to work like it should without porting Yes you can throw a cam in but I think you're a little backwards in the order to do these upgrades It's best to do the pipe first because if you do the intake the carburetor the cam porting all that other stuff you've still left the bike choked right down by the stock pipe Yes you can take the stock baffle out of the stock pipe I didn't hear you talk about that
Where did those nerf bars come from?
My 05 Trx has a problem when its in high gears it feels like something is limiting it idk its super weird
It’s probably the Rev limiter. So you don’t over rev the engine
Is ur motor built?
@@nickdorso3400 no
cool stuff bro i wish i had a way to collaborate with you on my new project any way i could get a way to talk to you?
Hey bro been trying to find ya on fb lol my buddy looking for a used warrior stage 1 or 2 cam if u or Wes got one layin on the shelf lmk k
I totally get it’s none of our business as viewers, but are you thinking about ever linking back up with Michael Sabo?? Love those older vids of you guys battling it out on the 400’s and the other shit too. Just bummed I don’t see yall kick together anymore
U're quad is plenty strong an fast. I'm always on the side of more air more power
Good ol’ ass dyno!
🤙🏻
🤣
Cool video
You wouldn’t happen do know what the stock jet sizes are?
170 main I believe
Do a smaller leak jet,
For the 05s just put on a 06+ carb
The green and pink don’t mix but sick quad tho
I agree it got me wanting to powdercoat it 😅
High compression stock bore , stage 2 cam, porting , exhaust,intake , go reliable power.
Literally did this but with a stroker kit stage 3 cam porting jetting exhaust vp110
Lectron carbs was gonna get one over 1000$
Green wire mod works
Stock cdi is the best cdi period.
You only need 1 mod. Buy a banshee.
One of the upgrades for the carburetor is to go to the Lectron smart carburetor there's also the SC2 which is smart carburetor too they use a metering rod instead of jets
Nobody uses that garbage
You must not be too well versed in the dirt bike ATV world Lectron carburetors are used quite often especially people that go up and down in elevation I know a few people that run them on their banshees
@@johnbruzzi4381just because you don't understand how it works or are unable to set it up correctly does not make the part junk
@@Adam-banshee-man I race xc and I Guess I'm saying that nobody is using them there.
@@johnbruzzi4381 a lot of people don't use them because of the very expensive price I know people that run them on banshees CR250 CR500 snowmobiles side-by-sides I probably know a 15 people at least that are using them either the SC2 or the Lectron
Unplugging the TPS does not move it to a higher ignition map or anything look it up there's a 2D and a 3D map The 2D map just uses RPM as it's base 2 advanced timing a 3D map uses RPM as well as throttle position sensor to make a 3D timing map Yes it starts a little easier with the TPS connected but I haven't had any issues running the 2D or the 3D timing map It's just important when starting it with the TPS still connected you don't hit the throttle that's what kills the starting components on these bikes I fix hundreds of bikes so trust me I know these things
I did look it up and got great information from very reputable sources. The cdi does not make its own timing map based on throttle position and rpm. These 2 maps are preset locked in and have no variation in them because theres no other information being input to the cdi for it to be able to calculate anything different based off of things like air temperature, coolant temperature and such. The only reason it starts easier is because the timing is a few degrees retarded on the 1st map otherwise this wouldnt be the case because nothing else changes. This is a common issue with 2 strokes also when advancing the timing on a plate they become harder to start because of the timing advance. It absolutely will not hurt the bike to leave the tps unplugged on a carbureted bike, it will just stay in the advanced timing map. Different story on efi but the trx was never efi from the factory. The only way you can change the ignition timing within the map is to have a programmable unit installed and make your own. Stock cdi is super basic its just 2 simple timing curves.
@@StupidFastJohn it doesn't make its own map but the position in the map that it uses the 3D map gets its inputs from the TPS and the throttle position whereas the 2D map only gets its input from crank position It's like an EFI map it can use different parts of the map depending on the inputs
@@MrATOMBOMB420 these dont have a crank position sensor.
@@StupidFastJohn it uses the pickup on the stator as a crank position it has to know a crank position in order to fire it's not like a crank position in a car but the pickup on the stator is what is used as a crank position sensor
The 2D table clearly has 2-dimensions, the 1st being the RPM, the second being the associated value. The limitation of this type of tuning is that the tune is static - it has no adaptability. If you are over ~66% throttle, then the DME uses this table, and it doesn't care about actual load. So, for example, if you are at 4000rpm, and 0psi of boost, your ignition timing is ~19°BTDC. And if you are at the same RPM, but 15psi of boost, your ignition is exactly the same: ~19°BTDC. Obviously the load on the motor is not the same for these two situations, so the ignition timing should be different, but it isn't.solution is to change the engine-management strategy to use 3-dimensions.Now the ignition timing is no longer purely dictated by RPM. With the additional axis of load, we can adjust to the dynamic-load nature of a turbocharged vehicle. Using our example from earlier: 4000rpm and 0psi of boost, the ignition timing dictated is ~42°BTDC. And at 4000rpm and 15psi of boost the ignition timing is ~23.2°BTDC. That is a huge change from the static 2-D table in the first example.The added dimension should be immediately obvious. The 1st dimension is LOAD; the second dimension is RPM; the third dimension is the associated value.Now the ignition timing is no longer purely dictated by RPM. With the additional axis of load, we can adjust to the dynamic-load nature of a turbocharged vehicle. Using our example from earlier: 4000rpm and 0psi of boost, the ignition timing dictated is ~42°BTDC. And at 4000rpm and 15psi of boost the ignition timing is ~23.2°BTDC. That is a huge change from the static 2-D table in the first example.
The addition of the 3rd-axis provides much better control and adaptability to changing engine loads and rpms. The end-result is a smoother, more linear power delivery, with multiple "secondary effects" such as economy, emissions, safety, ect.
👍🏾🤘🏾
🤙
Dude just pull the hood. Show the people.
This is sone of the worse advice I’ve heard for reliability.
LiKe the title says for MAX POWER 🤣🤙 its a honda anyways theyre bulletproof
What about alcohol
To drink?
@@johnbruzzi4381 to burn as in methanol