Type A Personality and Burnout? Genetics are Involved
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 ноя 2020
- Come along with Dr. Ben Lynch as he reviews Dr. Drew Sinatra's StrateGene report.
See first hand how your genes make Dopamine, use it, and eliminate it.
If any of these steps are altered genetically or epigenetically, focus, drive, attention and moods are affected in a big way.
You'll learn:
How dopamine is made
How dopamine is used in the brain
How dopamine is eliminated
How some people are caffeine sensitive
Why genetic testing by itself isn't useful. You need a full approach.
Ready to see how your Dopamine is made, used and eliminated?
Ready to see some genes which are associated with Caffeine sensitivity?
If so, you're ready to put StrateGene DNA Kit to work.
Here's where you order your StrateGene DNA Kit:
www.strategene.me
fantastic:)
thanks as always for the lecture, please do MORE
we need vitamins & minerals, but MD's don't know anything or dismiss this !
Thanks from Germoney! 🇩🇪😍
Thank you from Germany 🇩🇪
I'm earthing, too!
You should see my Strategene report - I'm so broken 😥
I'm wondering if the report ties all these things together like Dr Ben is doing.
Good to hear from you again Ben, You should start reading the fourth phase of water by Gerald H. Pollack I think this is the missing peace in biology.
Good one, thanks.
30:00
Please place a link to the podcast. Thank you.
Dr. Lynch, will StrateGene Kit be available internationally soon?
I want to know where I can get myself tested like this
I am ++ for the FUT2 gene & apparently do not secrete my blood in my saliva. Will Strategene be able to appropriately test my DNA?
Does LDN bring your dopamine levels up, and do you recommend it for people with high seratonin and low dopamine?
I have my report and just read the part where I am FAST MAOA it’s overwhelming for me. What do I do for this? Thank you 😊
Can StrateGene use 23andme data?
how many snips are accounted for here in relation to how many we know there are? and how many do we not know about? I wonder how much is all this really an indication of anything. I mean if it's a really small number, it seems like better to focus on the epigenetic effects alone and just forget about testing for genes. doesn't it? at least until we learn about most genes. otherwise we might be looking at an enzyme with 50 mostly "fast" snips and deducing it is slow because of the 5 snips we know of, 4 of which were slow, but is actually fast because of the others we know nothing about. I'm very for this idea and think it's amazing but wonder if we are there yet to make it a reliable thing as far as the genes go.
I agree with you about focusing on effects, however there is so much that people don't know to ask, it makes sense to have multiple strategies to study and learn the terrain, especially if it helps one to focus on the most probable issues for individuals. I'm sure that over time we will come up with many different ways to use this knowledge and analyze health more effectively as a consequence of asking questions like you are doing.