NEW! Jury Member SPEAKS OUT from Amber Heard Johnny Depp Trial
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2022
- Help support my content for $2 USD a month:
/ @josephmorris
Tip Jar: paypal.me/JosephMorris
SOURCE: www.tiktok.com/@seekinginfini...
I don't think this is fake.
NEW! Jury Member SPEAKS OUT from Amber Heard Johnny Depp Trial, don’t forget to subscribe!
A jury member from the Amber Heard Johnny Depp Trial has spoken out. They wish to remain anonymous but answered some pretty interesting questions. Turns out, they did NOT check out TikTok during the trial as Elaine Bredehoft claimed, but they found the edits HILARIOUS. They also noticed Amber Heard tripped up in her final testimony where she admitted she wrote the op-ed about Johnny.
The jury also noticed she did not shed a tear in the full 6 weeks of the trial. But they didn’t picked up on the ‘bruise kit’ in the photo of Johnny Depp passed out with ice cream running down his legs.
Some pretty eye-opening stuff! Check it out and don’t forget to susbcribe by hitting my face on the right hand side!
#JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard 
Кино
Crazy how Elaine accused multiple people of looking for their “15 minutes of fame”, but in less than 24 hours following the verdict, she embarked on a “media tour”. 🙄
😂😂😂
Elaine did the media tour (as paid services from media) when she realized that Amber Heard will only Pledge their Representation Services to Amber's Legal Team.😂😂😂
She's got to make money somehow because AH ain't paying up!!! Lol
Just kidding. AH has insurance that's been paying.
Imagine that!
She's just like AH
Juror sounds like a real, genuine, authentic, down to earth person, with common sense.
I hope him saying all of this was real! I'm hopeful and believe it, but you have to wonder in this world.
Thank you 🙏 juror, spot on!
How can we confirm it's real? I thought jurors can't speak until a year later.
People usually do when they successfully end up on a jury
They sound like a voice
yall really let this guy trick you into thinking its an actual juror huh?
Take this content with a grain of salt because we have absolutely no way to verify that this is an actual jury member speaking out
CONCORDO ISSO PODE SER UMA ARMADILHA QQ PESSOA SE PASSANDO POR JURI
Elon Musk has to know who they really are, and have to be true that this man is a jury, on internet they are saying that was a reason for Johnny Depp for not look Amber H on her eyes🤔 a weird thing about that, So what this man is saying about the look is a confirmation Plus the Jury (all of them) on the ending was not looking at her at all, they were avoiding her🤔
It's totally fake news....In my Trump voice😂😂😂😂😂
@Peace Maker That is not a juror...are you so easy to believe anything.? People, don't be like lost sheep
@@ednadunham8892 They can't help it. People are gullible as fuck!
She lost when she tried to explain that donating and pledging are synonyms. That right there baselined her veracity for the jurors.
If I had to try to squirm my way out of not paying a *charity for children* millions of dollars by trying to hoodwink the *world* on *live television* that a pledge is the same as payment … I’d spontaneously cease to exist out of shame and embarrassment.
I can’t believe how AH so confidently (and angrily) held her ground that they were the same thing and cobbled something up
@@chelseaandhobbes Apparently, in the UK trial she said she donated it. So maybe she was trapped by that lie - and chose the synonym path to avoid being caught out in front of the US jury as a liar. Well, one of the jurors was doing AMA on tik Tok, and pointed to the synonym debacle as when he decided she was a liar. Also he was so uncomfortable with her looking at the jurors when she spoke he stopped looking at her.
@@chelseaandhobbes that was some funny shit! Spontaneously cease to exist! Lol! I bust out laughing 😃
Or the great video where she admits to alerting TMZ, then quickly tries to cover her ugly face realizing she caught herself up…
@@jeninlight that clip plus the TMZ guy testifying really was a bad look for Ambuser Turd. Glad johnny got justice. Sad to see the media STILL trying to go after johnny and paint him as the abuser. Idk why they're trying to defend her so hard. Well it's a good thing if they keep doing it do people can see the media lies about almost everything.
The way she kept staring at the jury freaked me out, and I wasn't there. She's scary.
It was her attorney's idea. I have no clue what they were thinking.
Yeah, I feel like she's going to hold a vendetta against that jury and try to harass them. Psycho b***
Heard gave evidence in the UK case where witnesses are always advised to address their answers directly to the Judge or Jury (if there is one ) and not to the lawyer asking the questions...obviously this isn't the practice in US courts and it hasn't worked for her this time..
Are you a man?with one punch will make her forget her name
Yeah, that was very odd behaviour!
How do they know it was a legit jury member? 🤔
Exactly! For all we know this is the content creator!
We don’t. I have questions.
I am hoping all the real jurs stay quiet for the 21 days as to not cause a mistrail or mess somethung up after all this hard work!
@@ChelseaNae what 21days ? I don't recall hearing that. However, I think this person is probably a fraud anyway.
Is definitely not a jury member. Definitely team AH to have a legitimate right of appeal. After 21 days probably they will speak.
their is zero proof this is a member of that jury.
Glad to hear him clarify how jurors were not privy to social media during this time, this will help knock down AH's chance of appeal
Omg that would be great cause she’s done enough damage to Johnnys well being, it’s time for her to leave and get the heck out of the country.
If Elaine keeps bashing and blaming the jury and court it will catch up with her in appeals!
@@sorrella oh that would be good
If I remember correctly they’re not suppose to research anything during trial.
@@Moonlight-yx5sgthey are not, but to me that seems pretty much impossible. Even if they weren't searching for anything, I bet someone they know might "hint" at certain things..but hey..what fo I know..just seems like it would be hard not to hear or see ANYTHING about those two
I think the jury listened, weighed the evidence heard the recordings and took their job very seriously, like all juries should: well done 👍🏼👏🏼👏🏼💜
I agree. Even if they were sequestered, i believe it wouldn’t have changed the verdict. AH did all the damage to herself by herself… ok, her legal team helped 😄
Right!
Actually the jury made erroneous judgements. Out of 3 statements they got 2 wrong conclusions.
you are 100 spot on. i have been a juror twice, once on a similar case but it was a criminal proceeding. I kn ow what it is like in there to have to compromise especailly , and everyone take it very seriously. It is an actual honor to provide this service for your country and no one , i mean pretty much no one treats it like a joke when peoples lives are at stake. Every single piece of evidence would have been l;ooked at, throughout the trial and after the trial in deliberations. The right verdict came out and as far as Elaine getting on the media and basically saying she does not believe in her own countries due process, she should be ashamed of herself and perhaps think about retirement becuase at one point I empathized with her but after seeing her on the media now spitting out rubbish and lies compelling evidence that was thrown out . That was a total load of crap. as she knows the law and know the rules of the court litigation and if she doesnt like it she should retire. I have no sympathy for her anymore. she deserves everything she gets too
Absolutely. It was appalling to hear Elaine run to different television shows and insulting the jury! She of anyone should know know she can’t say that. Very very unprofessional. And I would feel greatly insulted by her if I was a juror.
That Is not an actual juror. Come on now people!
This is not one of the jurors. This can hurt Johnny Depp and help with their appeal. They will wait for the 21 days before even thinking about anything til verdict is final. Please stop believing in this. Let Johnny finally live his life
The Juror sounded genuine and upfront. What I'm thankful for is that they didn't need social media to make their decision, they used their discernment. Says alot about how we should ALWAYS TRUST OUR GUT!!! Justice for Johnny!!!!
Exactly!! This also blows Elaine's remarks this morning out of the water of how the jurors were privvy to outside information. She's a liar as well.
@@witch_haunts_ghost still poor Ms elaine I think its an order from AH PR team but Ms Elaine talking to TV shows right now not helping AH at all, im not saying they dont have a voice and should not talk but I dont know, i feel like the timing is not right.
Elaine has said in an interview the jurors were influenced by media the woman can’t accept defeat
Yet, with Elaine's interview earlier, she almost insisted that the jury defied the judge's order to stay away from social media. smh.. any excuse to uphold AH's BS.
@@witch18Lho I hope Johnny's team will be able to use it against Amber's case if they appeal
She tried to convince the jury those two photos were different also. Imagine how annoyed you'd be as a juror when someone is blatantly lying in their face. That would have turned me.
I was so annoyed at her testimony, the audacity of her to think she can manipulate anyone and everyone..
That’s how Gaslighting works, they lie to your face, you know they’re lying because you have evidence however they continue to lie, twist the narrative to make you think you’re going insane and you must be missing the truth.
AH: "Of course these two photos are different, I edited them myself!!!"
Yupp, it's fucking insulting to the jury to think they would believe this nonsense
She literally thinks everyone is just that stupid that they’d not get the fact that it’s the exact same photo and her lying is enough to cover that up
And we really believe this person is one of the jurors....really?
Why would a legit juror out themselves on TikTok? This sounds like a scam and we need to be careful because this could compromise the case. Also what Elaine is doing by throwing the jury under the bus and saying they were influenced by social media is despicable! It totally undermines the system in which she is licensed to practice law.
This happened after the OJ trial. It doesn't matter tbh. One of them wrote a book IIRC. Heard + EB are evil though and went after the nurse's license and reported her "former friend" to the IRS. I wouldn't out myself until after her appeals were exhausted but maybe the guy or gal is judgment proof. Who knows if this is real tho.
The only person who mentioned media was Amber who complained about hate comment on social media while on the stand!!! This is team loco!!!
Elaine is not undermining the system. She is destroying her credibility as a lawyer. Everyone knows that a jury is not allowed to consider any media while they are jurying.
Same thing I thought I don’t believe this I think it’s scam
No juror would do this.
As a spectator I was uncomfortable with how Amber would stare at the jury and rephrase the question to answer what she wanted to say instead of what was asked so I can only imagine how weird that felt for the actual jury members
Her lawyers should have got her to stop doing that. Poorly coached I thought
@@jimstanborough825 Most of her witnesses did the exact same thing so I assumed that they were coached to do exactly that
@@jimstanborough825 I do not think they themselves could get Amber to stop doing anything!!! She literally sabotaged her own case they were trying to defend.
If AH didn't do it on every single question then perhaps it would've looked better. But questions that are so short like "that's correct", "that's incorrect" should be directed at the lawyer, that's what made her creepy.
@@slapstickdome9797 I doubt those same lawyers will want to take on her appeal. Bet they're glad to see the back of her! All that note passing was absurd.
“ everything heard said seemed like Bullshit”....pretty much consensus and straight to the point. Good job Jurors.
I'm sure the Hearders will use this dude's statements as grounds for appeal, that the jury was biased. He shoulda STFU rather than compare her to his ex in a public interview - makes the process look less legit. Dude, everybody's had an ex like this; we understand. You didn't need to say it out loud. As f'd up as it is, juror personalizing to himself would be something for her team of d*psh*t lawyers to jump on.
@@zyrosqrd2552 it's going to be really hard to appeal when there's not guaranteed proof of it being an actual juror during the case.
It looks like a HOAX to me from the moment she figured out that Johnny had enough and wanna get out of the marriage… she then file divorce before him with TMZ notified and throw Johnny under the bus!
Continue to play the victim then represent them and killed Johnny one last time with the op-ed in front of the world!!!
What a cruelty!!!
You can NEVER trust the words a narcissist speaks! If you let them know you've ONCE believed them, they hook into this and end up manipulating/controlling you. I've just been through it and had never even heard of narcissism before - believe me, it's DANGEROUS and very much MIND CONTROL.
@@zyrosqrd2552 none of my exes were like amber heard
I don't believe that this is someone on that jury at all.
*ATTENTION *
I just want to make people aware that this guy has a history of giving false information for views and posting corpses in thumbnails apparently.
Another youtuber has mentioned if you slow down his voice it sounds a hell of a lot like the " Jurors ."
This can be Extremely damaging for Johnny Depp.
So please don't take this as fact.
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
🙏🏽🙏🏽 I still can’t find the link to the “juror’s” TikTok
@@marshe2009 That’s because Joseph Morris has took it down cuz he knows hes been caught out lying AGAIN
Also I hardly believe the juror would call amber a "crazy" woman on his post so soon / if ever after the trial ..although we all know she def is crazy but for juror to say that, IS a bad move, considering it can possibly be brought back up to the courts,and may try lookin to get it reversed on mistrial grounds, if that's actually a thing In civil court. 🤔.. Just sayin ......... It can havr a strong motion to act on during appeals ..
Sounds like bull****
And I don't think a real jury member would be in much of a rush to examine the trial on social media.
I knew that sitting in her presence and feeling it- someone was going to have experienced someone like her before and recognize it for what it was. Good job jury. 👏🏼
It’s not surprising that she was trying to hold eye contact with male jurors. She was probably relying on her manipulative ways, but fails to realize she’s not exactly the bombshell she was when she was w Depp. I guess being evil to the core really ages you 😬
Reminds me of my ex tbh, would gas light and belittle me whenever she’d get upset.
@@astrodude9146 its astonishing how cluster B people act the same...it's like they go to Narc U...this guy knew it...so glad they saw the BS
The reason why everyone is talking about this case is because someone lied without any proof or evidence & people didn’t question it. Plz don’t let the host of this channel fool you. He put this out himself for views & likes & donations He has done this before with Gabby patito case & was caught out. Don’t let him insult your intelligence before you look into this. He is no better than Amber Turd & her lies. Think before you believe everything you hear. 😡🤬😡🤬
I appreciate this juror's honesty of how things went. He sounds like he was not biased and help to make sound and right decisions. Thanks for serving and coming forward.
This youtuber has faked stuff before apparently. Thats the word anyway. He faked being some fugitive. I think this is BS
The jury members are not allowed to speak about the case so this is not true
@@suemjloaf I was under the impression that the juror themselves could come forward with who they were and talk but that on all other fronts their names were sealed for one year.
@@commiecomrade2644 if this is true, I hope there is truthful exposure.
@@suemjloaf I don't know how the laws work after cases. I have also heard they can speak like this, but they will remain anonymous for a year. This would majorly suck.
Yo… This guy is full of it. There’s absolutely no proof that this is a real juror and look at this guy‘s history with posting inaccurate blatantly wrong information. This is for clicks and we all did it. And yeah I’m a total Johnny Depp fan and I can see through the BS here
Could be.
@@Starry_Night_Sky7455 Not 'could be', but "IS" Miss. Download his bullsh1t audio, play it back and speed it up a tad in Audacity (free & safe software), you will immediately find that the recording is of Mr Morris HIMSELF, reading an unintelligent script he presumably made up himself, and then just slowed it down a little, before mixing to mp3. I hope the actual Juror publicly objects to this seemingly libellous publication by Mr Morris, because if I become aware of his identity, I will send him the details regarding Mr Morris being the originating public source of the claims (on Twitter). And I hope he gets sued and loses everything he owns. Profiteering from spreading fabrications and lies in public, it's a despicable 'trade' for anyone to choose. Ve
ITS FAKE! The host of this channel did it He is KNOWN FOR LYING to get views & likes
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
This isn’t a real juror there’s no way…
"Uncomfortableness of eye contact when you can't say anything back"
Yes. This is a thing. Eye contact affects us at a very basic animalistic level. More eye contact = dominance, authority. This is why parents, teachers, employers, bosses, lawmen play staring contests with you. This is why we are told to maintain eye contact if in close proximity with a wild predatory animal. This is why sheep dogs, police dogs, military dogs are taught to maintain eye contact with their subject. This is also why your mom said "look at me when I'm talking to you". That wasn't so she could see your eyes. That was so you would look up and see her eyes. That's why that teacher said you had an attitude when you looked him straight in the eye. Eye contact = dominance, authority.
Excellent, accurate points.
Holy shit that's why I avoid eye contact
JD said he would never let AH see his eyes again. That is why he would never look at her during the trial. She was constantly looking over at him, trying to catch his eye. Maybe we all missed a major clue there. She was probably eye balling him like she did the jury throughout their partnership / marriage.
🙄
On the day of her verdict, she made no contact with her lawyer, Ben Rottenborn. She never greeted him, acknowledged him, hugged him, as she did to Elaine and her other legal representative. He is probably very relieved that this trial is over. Good Luck to BR when trying to get any money out of AH. Another law case coming up perhaps?
IMO. Allegedly.
All valid points, but there is a flip side to eye contact as well and both need to be used "appropriately" and "genuinely". AH was neither "appropriate" nor "genuine".
Very insightful! Thanks for sharing! 👍✨
I honestly feel that the jury did their part and stayed off social media the whole time during the trial. I thank all the jurors for doing a wonderful job. Not because of the out come mind you. They had to listen to all of the testimonies and then go back through everything all over again.
I agree. Imagine being there every single day, early morning to afternoon, for 6 weeks just listening to people constantly point fingers (he said and she said) at each other... and maybe sometimes listen to or read evidence. That's exhausting.
I would absolutely hate to look through social media and see it again, while I still had to deal with it the next day. 😅
Technically all we can say is he says he stayed off Social Media. He can't really speak for the other jurors.
AH admitted that she was watching social media, Oh! I forgot rule doesn’t apply to her!! I told everyone she won’t stop, but in court she said “ all I want is to move on and for Johnny to leave me alone “ we all saw that she was stalking him the moment he left the court room, and telling social media where he was at all times!! ( AH is truly a monster)
Jury seems to have done well on deciding on more realistic amount of money than the one in the initial claim. Hence yes, this jury can be congratulated on being able to reach a very-down-to-earth financial decision. What is interesting yet what could have been expected is the fact that this member of the jury seemed to have relied more on his own direct personal experience with gaslightning than on hard evidence in this case.
@@nancygallantclough7623 Preach… And her delusional Girlfriend. They will live happy together in their fantasy land.
OK but literally ANYONE could say they were a juror I would take this with a grain of salt
Jury member has NOT BEEN VERIFIED. Please do not just post story without verifying please. We do not want jury misconduct.
The judge has the jurors names and identity sealed for one year, there is no way to be able to confirm identity
Wow. So interesting to hear directly from a jury member about how uncomfortable it made him feel that she was so aggressively seeking eye contact. I wondered about that. Even when she's eliciting sympathy she is aggressive. She can't hide that about herself. No self insight whatsoever.
You make an excellent point that I have not heard before! Yep, aggressive at every turn. That’s really interesting too. It’s like a body language “tell”.
hiatrionic
she wanted them to react
she didnt get any reaction
and she was getting even weirder.😅
Everything she said- even her body language, when she was ‘crying’, etc. - her demeanor was ALWAYS aggressive. Noticed that right from the start. Angry and full of hate/rage too.
Yep, leave it to the Fly Guy J Depp, to slay the Goliath of that crappy me too movement!... now me too is canceled 2!
I think it is sad that she might have had a case but when I watched the trial for myself, her lawyer told AMBER to look at the Jury when she answered. I THINK BOTH Member's lawyers were not helping her case to say the least. Just my thoughts...
So proud of this jury and was thrilled they were able to see and hear the truth.
I really doubt he's a real juryer
Same here. I honestly didnt care about either of them until I saw a clip of AH on the stand and I immediately said “she’s lying!”, after that I got drawn in and couldn’t believe that she did this to him! To lie about DV and then to add sexual assault on top just to make it that much worse is despicable, and she should be investigated for perjury! In the US and UK!
@@angelwings0224 yeah I got that impression too. And does anyone really think that no juror saw anything about this case on social media? 😂 I’m sure they stayed off their phones for 2 months
@@brandonc7189 Yea they released the race and ages of the jurors and this guy's voice doesn't seem to fit any of the profiles. I bet he's just looking to make a buck🙄
No they had to compromise etc, i just knew there was gonna be that ONE bitch on ambers side and i bet thats why it took so long. Amber didn’t deserve anything fuck that 2m johnny shoulda had his 25m at the least considering the gall of AH trying to counter sue for double what johnny asked.
How do we know that this person was actually a jury member?
He’s not legit. (That lawyer you know, YT) he used an LA County Juror badge
@@kpcali3348 great find this video is worthless lmao
What rubbish - and dangerous to JD's result. Prove this"juror" is real!
It is so cool hearing from this juror’s perspective all the things we kept saying the jury must be thinking. We were so afraid they’d be duped by her, but no, not even close. Thanks for posting this! Justice has been served.
its literally a guy with a burner account on tiktok, could be anybody
This youtuber was outed faking stories in the Gaby Petito case and you’re just going to believe he out of everyone else who is bigger in RUclips just happened to get a juror, please 😒
@@WriterDude130 LOL yeah I really don't believe it but that's ok, the trial is over and JD got his life back. I would only assume the jurors reactions were similar to ours, it's hard not to be in favor of JD after watching this trial. I myself came in from an unbiased perspective but the facts clearly didn't add up for AH and her testimony which was tragic to say the least. She made it even easier with the smirking and smiling which leads me to believe she's so narcissistic that she can't even control it.
I commented that throughout the trial. Her spinning her head and staring at the jury EVERY TIME she responded was downright obsessive psychotic behavior. They all had to be getting uncomfortable with it. She NEVER stopped doing it. I'm glad they got weirded out by her.
Even if it was just a "No" answer.
I like the actor Depp, I am convinced he spoke the truth, and I believe Heard lied whenever she spoke.
But I would never perform any "body language analysis" with actors on the stand.
A good actor is just that - able to actively control his body language, demeanor, speech, etc.
Also, it is not needed in this case. The countless proven lies, and the convincing statements by Depp suffice, in my opinion.
BTW, I would not feel uneasy by Heard's looks. More by the assertive way she speaks.
It should be noted that all of AH witnesses did the same, so i´m guessing they were instructed to do so. That is a terrible fail from her lawyers, to not have picked up on how that was affecting the jury´s predisposition towards her. Some eye contact is a good thing. A lot of eye contact is counter-productive, because it looks made on purpose. Total fail on Elaine´s part.
Right now, Elaine is still her lawyer, spinning that the jury was "influenced". But pretty soon i expect AH to throw her lawyers under the bus, and claim she was a "victim of bad counseling". You just wait.
@@Biden_is_demented Yes she may be going down that road, especially if she decides to appeal. She would be better advised, however, to use her remaining friends (if any) to help her pay out Depp, get therapy and finally get her life in order (note I'm not saying "back in order"). And hope that no one goes after her perjury incidents....
@@Chr15T your problem is, that you are reasonable. Just stoppit.
How do you know for a FACT that this person is a legit jury member? It could be anyone claiming to be a juror, when they had nothing to do with the trial. It could even be someone from Amber's team trying to get a mistrial.
They showed their Juror Badge on their tiktok page.
There can't be a mistrial the case is over & the jury is free to give their opinion but if this was done during the trial then yes.
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
Exactly. But yet people believe this crap. Jury won't speak out for awhile. The trial isn't over, as such yet anyway
The case isn't over at all
They have to meet to discuss certain things. Numerous lawyers have stated not to speak to these people incase they are members of AH team. They are citing social media for grounds of appeal, then like magic, jurors pop up speaking. Yeah right
This “juror” could be anyone. No way to prove. The info/ answers seem like BS.
i agree and something about the use of “lol” and “bs” from this juror’s answers raises an eyebrow 🤨
I agree, this doesn't sound legit at all.
Download the audio and speed up a little in any sound editing app. It sounds like Mr Morris' voice. It's another Joseph Morris scam.
ITS FAKE! The host of this channel did it He is KNOWN FOR LYING to get views & likes
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
The Juror seems like a smart, honest man. He went with his gut feeling and that led to the truth. Thank you so much Mr. Juror.
It's pretty hilarious all y'all believe this video WITHOUT any actual facts to back up this is in fact one of the jury members! Just like everyone belived Amber 6 years ago and they turned out to be wrong, I bet you anything this is fake also and actually in all honesty sounds like Joseph himself!!!!🤷🏼♂️🤦♂️🤣🤦♂️
This comment made me laugh. You hear a random guy speak for less than a minute and you say he seems like a smart and honest man? I’m gonna guess that if the verdict had gone to Amber Heard you’d be saying the exact opposite. 😂
@@noctislucis5862 Actually, you are wrong. Nice try though.
@@Bizzy7891 When you reply, it helps to construct your sentences to make sense. Lmao!
@@noctislucis5862 lol totally! People are completely unaware of themselves. Also, who can guarantee this guy was juror? Not that I think he wasn’t, he’s responses are quite diplomatic. But, being a juror or pretending to be one is perfect opportunity for social media fame.
It amazes me that Elaine and others in the media are still championing Amber’s cause, still spewing out lies about the jury and the trial. Good to hear what I thought all along. The jury could see through Miss Heard’s deceit and cruel callousness.
They both deserve each other lol.
When she was asked if she thought jury watched the trial etc on social media during trial, and she said yes ...its like no no dum dum. Only ure legal team, turd and friends did. She is only proving shes as awful as appeared. Had sum sympathy for her for a moment, having to deal with wicked witch however, shes STILL spewing falsehoods about him AFTER the trial rather than moving on. Its like lady, EVEN if thete were no pics etc, your client was an asstard on stand, put her foot in her mouth MANY times during testimony and cross, she shld have read the same script she had her friends/fam memorize. She elaborated EACH time she told the story. Maybe she also realizes he was the only one since, that actually gave a crap about her and took care or her loved ones also.
Lastly, im so happy the jury and judge gave a fair trial/verdict.
I agree, doesn't she/they have anything better to do?
I just ended my subscription to the NYT and told them they need to start reporting the truth: women ARE capable of abuse. We are totally being gaslit by mainstream media. I can’t believe a word of the news after this. I know what I saw with my own eyes, heard with my own ears. The losers from this trial are AH and nearly every news publication. Can’t trust any of them.
They will stop soon because AH cannot pay them anymore. Can you say: BANKRUPT 😳
"You heard it here first "....did you confirm this is true yet?
This is dangerous and could affect the verdict and threaten the whole trial. You need to take this down!!!!
I was wondering. I don't know too much about this type of stuff, but listening to this immediate caused my brows to furrow and brought about concern and nervousness about if this could still affect the case.
This isn’t verified as true and could be harmful to the case if spread. I agree this needs to be taken down
@@gvfodor1 too late it’s already been published in the daily Mail
ITS FAKE! The host of this channel did it He is KNOWN FOR LYING to get views & likes
@@lawoftheuniverse3089 Damn that's effed up! Will block him!! That's shit people like Ambuser does! Egregious!
I'm glad the jury picked up alot of what the public did following this trial.
I feel that if this trial had not been so transparent and clean the jury might have had a different outlook than the public. The fact that we the public got to see EVERYTHING was the key to both opinions being similar. I saw a lot of minds who were in the Amber camp change during the course of the trial based on evidence.... as its suppose to be.
@@Spartan1312 but by saying that you assume that everyone who followed the trial has watched the trial in its entirety, which is not true. The vast majority of people who followed it mainly got their information from youtube compilations and tiktok video’s, which were heavily swayed in Depp’s favour
@@purplefishy8164 But the trial is still there to be watched, even in the past sense. The public who did watch it got to see the legal teams argue their points and why, we got to see the jury instructions and the negotiations as to why they were worded the way they were. It is also why everything in these cases is a matter of public record. It is one of the key functions of our legal system.
@@Spartan1312 Exactly. I have said on a number of posts that after the testimonies and evidence was presented and examined... any Amber Heard supporters remaining were people that were cut from the same cloth that she is.
@@nyronfranklin5789 Or just a ideologue pushing a personal or public agenda
Funny how Johnny's guilty of his lawyer's statements but Amber was dodging all responsibility for what her camp did.
She is literally bat 💩 crazy. So in her mind, Johnny can’t have an opinion in the public only Amber can? He should lose millions and she should be rewarded and the fact that her attorneys are doubling down and trying to call out the jurors and the legal system is equally crazy. I originally kind of felt sorry for her attorneys having to deal with Amber but now I don’t. Dig in deeper Elaine, you are out of your depth.
I still don't agree with how they could find both were guilty of defaming each other. if they believed that Amber did indeed defame Johnny with a hoax, then what Johnny's lawyer said wasn't Defamation and didn't have malice as he believed it. doesn't make sense
@@alexbro4187 Right. And the jury did that as a compromise with the slowest juror.
@@alexbro4187 I totally agree.....not to mention that Johnny didn't even say it---his lawyer did! So how can she sue Johnny Depp for it? Just seems like she'd have to sue the lawyer. Makes no sense!
@@lisaomalley160 I think it was because he was Johnny's lawyer before he was pulled off the team for publishing that article. The association was enough to have a degree of defamation
By spreading this, you could be giving Amber grounds for an appeal by jury misconduct. Use your brain!
I'm not sure how it works, but do they have to wait 21 days? I've seen some jurrors get interviewed from other high profile cases literally the next day. Not sure how she could say it's misconduct now that the trial is officially over.
I am skeptical about the credibility of this so called “juror”. Literally any one of us could hide our faces, go on one of the socials and say we were a juror for clicks and likes. His verbiage was not that of a juror. Firstly, he uses the term “guilty” instead of “liable” & says regarding damages that they left it blank instead of awarding her anything. I doubt this as they probably left it blank because they had no intention of giving her anything other than the zero they agreed upon. I could go on and on and on as nauseam but I have serious credibility questions.
Note: I could be wrong but he even uses the jury numbering process that Runkle and DUI Guy used not the numbering the courts used.
Also the dude linked his spiritual instagram to the post so..... Attention whore is my guess for now
I have the same issue. If this was real why isn't it all over lawtube and Twitter??? Like you, I could be wrong but I am skeptical.
Exactly! PLEASE DONT BELIEVE THIS!
You raised a good point. It's probably fake. The history of this channel definitely doesn't add more credibility.
@@fadingworld5569 He is not the only individual that has posted this content. Trust me, I am not personally swayed by YT content creators.
Her staring at them was an attempt at intimidation imo. The fact that she also made at least him, and probably others feel HIGHLY uncomfortable says a lot about how she projects herself tbh.
I think it might have also been a manipulative thing she does with men.....She's probably used to getting her way with men.
Witnesses are often advised to look at the jury, to connect.
But like everything else she way overdid it .
It was almost comical, the level of exaggeration,if not such a serious matter.
Her energy was so bad I could hardly watch much less listen to her via TV. Hard to believe anyone is comfortable around that!
@@peaceblossom5852 Same !
Whatever day it was toward the end of the trial , when she kept staring directly into the camera ...I had to put a post it note over her face on the screen . So creepy!
@@peaceblossom5852 I agree. I was watching just the court feed until she got on the stand. I had to watch Emily Baker while she was on because it just made me ill... I needed some other energy to counteract it.
Being a female it infuriates me when women like Amber lie about abuse, which hurts women who really suffered. Sometime ago, I watched that tape, and listened to how cruel she is, and how she volunteered that she would smack Johnny around. These two were so toxic around each other, and they knew this before the marriage! Amber kept speaking about how she loved Johnny, she hasn't a clue what love is, sadly Johnny doesn't either. The settlement the jury came up with sounds fair, looks like in the end they will both break even.
Agree with you.
I don't know about that. He has a good relationship with and says he loves his children. He may not know how to a balance a relationship with work yet was married for a number of years and sounded fairly level headed and compassionate on the audio tapes when he was trying to problem solve with AH.
Yeah my wife was abused by parents that were both narcissists. But AH is one of the worst I’ve seen. And she could tell right away who was the abuser. I worry about her new baby child and what it will be like behind closed doors.
@@themisfit9465 I hope that child won’t be abused, but I’m hopeful that any nanny or teachers of that kid would pay attention and make sure there’s nothing amiss.
I think she brought out toxicity from him that he’d maybe never expressed before. I could see him being a jealous partner but not abusive or aggressive
How exactly did you "confirm" that it's a juror?...
There is absolutely NO way for you to verify this juror. People, there are better channels than this one. I encourage you to look for them. It's not this one.....
First and foremost, makes me happy to know they took their jobs as jurors seriously. I'm happy they took notice of everything we did...no tears from nutty Amber, she made things up as she went along, they caught on to her lie when she first said she didn't write the op-ed about Johnny then days later slipped and admitted she had. A job well done by all 7!
They did a great job!
You said it perfectly!!
It’s fake! Slow the voice down, It’s Morris the host of this channel Hes known for lying just to get views n likes
"You go before a judge and jury and tell them you're a victim of abuse, see if they believe you!" Well, he did, and they did.
Yes!!! 💜
The Jurors got it right❤
Amen
THIS is CRAP and you need to take THIS down.....NO REAL JUROR is going to DO this and jeopardize the results of the trial BEFORE the the window is closed for the appeal process.
Where's the proof that this is a juror? And if you don't have confirmation this is a real juror, you are spewing BS. This is not good for anyone if it's fake!
I TOO TOTALLY appreciate that juror's honesty - he was and did what was right!
Thank God for these down-to-earth jurors.
As an audio expert, i can confidently say that the guys just edited his voice deeper and pretend to be the juror. Pathetic
Ya'll. There's no way to verify this is real at all and could potentially hurt the case as it is not over due to appeals. AH could try and use this as jury misconduct. Also, identities being under seal for one year makes it harder to verify. Stop using this for views Joseph. Life wtf..
Totally! Guys you have to stop spreading this “info” it’s not verified as true.
Totally agree
I thought the same thing :(
This is not juror misconduct. Once the verdict is announced they free to discuss.
The only thing they have to do is remain anonymous. Which is exactly what he did. 🤡🤡
My faith in the justice system with respect to juries has been restored. After the Casey Anthony trial, I was a little worried but one would have had to be completely blind not to see how manipulative Amber Turd is, right down to staring at the jury during testimony. It was quite obviously an attempt to play to, manipulate the jury rather than an effort to connect with them. Thank you, sir.
Actually, if that case had been done on “lawtube”, I think the media spun bias would have prepared people for “not guilty”. I had served on a jury and watched that trial similar to how the jury was hearing things. AND right away, I said “not guilty” for murder. At no time did the prosecutor connect Casey to the body of her child. And the whole family came off as shady people. Dad looked suspicious and came off as lying on the stand… and of course, Casey never took the stand to witness her in a examination or cross.
Also, Jose, her attny, was amazing to the jury. The judge and prosecutor being over the top “acting tough”, played ok to the cameras, but a jury wouldn’t like that crap.
I was Never surprised by the verdict- especially because they went overboard and tried to add a death penalty. Hard to kill a young woman who shows up and can cry in court at times.
You are so ignorant 🤣. Justice system is as fucked as before you just changed ur whole opinion after 1 trial including famous and rich people televized to the public
Why? Nothing will end up happening to her. She will not pay one red cent.
@@marsoblivi0n945 perjury charges would be something….
The Casey Anthony jury was not well informed of what their job was. I remember one juror who said the prosecution couldn't prove the manner of death so she walked. The instructions they received were terrible.
I lost a lot of hope in juries over the years but this jury gives me hope that the truth will prevail. Good over evil and justice for the innocent. Nice job jury!!
Same here
Same here.
Just out of curiosity, which jury decisions made you lose hope?
@@MentosBejeweled2 I truly marvel at whoever were those jurors who felt empathy for such a vicious beast as Heard.
THIS ISNT JURY
It's not confirmed this guy was really in the jury. This is for clicks. If we accept every random person was there they could say something wrong, which may even be challenged legally by Amber's team.
It's really good to hear that her bs acting didn't fool the jury, they say what the rest of the world saw. I thought being in the court room may have impacted the jury differently. Much respect for the judge and jury having to sit through this.
facts
The irony in all this is that AH is supposed to be an actress. Yet she couldn’t act well enough save her own case.
It was probably more obvious in the court room, unedited… she can’t keep the act up every second…
I’m glad the jurors had common sense and really listened to facts of the situation.
Wow you cannot prove this is an actual juror since all of their names have been sealed you are doing extreme damage at this point you need to stop and take down this video stop telling people that this is an actual juror you don't know...
and how do you even know if this isn't just some crazy person putting that out, what and how did you confirm it?
Glad to hear from the jurors. That proves that Elaine's statement trying to portray them as confused and stupid is inaccurate and condescending. We all got it right
The only thing that was confused and stupid was compromising and finding that Johnny defamed Amber. That was illegal. Each is supposed to give their own vote, not compromise.
@@genxx2724 one of the jurors was stubborn about that. Probably also the one that voted for the 2million that's given to Scamber.
Elaine even argued with the Judge throughout the weeks........ Idk why she's still working she should've been disbarred or retire with cats as her only companions.
@@MollyHJohns That’s fine. They were required to report that they were deadlocked. If the judge determined that they could not reach a unanimous verdict, there would have been a mistrial on Amber’s case rather than Johnny being found liable and having to pay $2 million. All are required to agree, NOT COMPROMISE.
@@MollyHJohns i actually think it was good strategy to give Amber 2 million. The second statement from Waldman is the weakest among 3 due to lack of evidence. They awarded her 2 million, it will make it harder for her to appeal because in a way she "won" proving one statement to be defamatory towards her. So why appeal if you won?
Agree with what the juror said, glad he could see straight through her.
"You heard it here first" lmao people falling for this thinking its real is pretty sad. Wouldn't be surprised if this dude created it himself for views
When I commented the same, his reply was "you'll get over it"
don´t let yourself get fooled - there is no confirmation that this is an actual juror!!!
I was like him. I didn't really know much about Johnny Depp and Amber Heard's case until the trial began in US. I watched some of the trial videos and listened to the witnesses' testimonies and it wasn't too difficult to figure out who was the real abuser. And I hoped that Johnny would win since then. I'm glad that justice has been served!
Well said
I suppose many people watching the case have been in your position. At least this is my impression. In fact, seems to me that many actual survivors of domestic violence , not fans of both sides and keen cinema goers as mass media wanted us to believe, have followed this trial. Precisely due to the fact that this case was about a defamation resulting from an accussation of an alleged physical abuse. And yes, this is also why a response to mrs Heard and to the verdict has been so intense. Since most followers and observers of this trial were people like you, not familiar with her or her ex-husband until this very trial.
same here ... I would see posts froma FB friends about the ongoing case but chose to ingore them, though curious ( I am not really keen on people in show business) , anyway, not until days before the verdict that started to watch some of the videos and there and then, I should say, never that I sympathize with the woman.
Same here.
Can this be proven? Anybody can claim they were part of the jury since they were anonymous.
This ALLEGED juror needs to be verified by one of the yt channels that were actually in the court room !!!!!
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
Doxxing is bad
Thanks for sharing this! It's great to hear the perspective of a juror!
Amber made her bed of lies now she has to live with them , I thought it was pretty awful what she wrote on Twitter right after about dv she should be ashamed of herself .
She made her bed of lies and where she lies with her poo too! 😄
But, as a narcissist, she isnt.
Bed full of sh*t
That’ll never happen. Until she’s put in the slammer, that thing will NEVER stop!
People like amber never experience shame. They are so self centered.
Elaine, straight-up, insults the integrity of the jury---improper as heck.
Well she took amber as a client , are you surprised? She’s a dirty lawyer and we could all feel that she doesn’t even believe in her client . A loss for women would mean a win for amber .
This could damage the case there is no proof this is a member of the jury ,, please take it down !
Thank you !!! Gabby too. Keep this coming it’s great to hear the jury’s insight. Thank god they were RATIONAL 🙏🏻
I love this juror, he's saying exactly what I thought
Which means you could have said you were a juror too and replied the same way. We still cannot be sure about this person being member of the jury.
@@doicounttoo6861 I think he sound like one of the jury so maybe he actually is
@@E.A what 🤣 what in this video did you here or see anything that proves they're real Jury members. This is just a guy trying make money
@@Simlife101 i agree. The judge said the jurors are not allowed to talk about the case for a year.
@@daisysfield5456 not true. She approved protection if they wanted anonymity, but they have full freedom to talk if they want.
😄 So satisfying to hear a juror say exactly what we were feeling. I appreciate the entire video! 🙏
Please tell me you’re not faking stuff again Joseph. I’m seriously not trying to be mean I just don’t want anything messing this up for Johnny…
Brilliant! Thank you for this
I feel that the jury's decision was a victory for all domestic violence victims. I hope more men who suffer at the hands of their abusers will come forward.
The case wasn't about domestic violence. It was a defamation case.
@@WILLYLYNCH. Legally, yes, but it became a platform for DV victims
SAME.. I watched my mother abused My Sweet Daddy for most of my life and she still does. Amber Heard reminds me of my mother when she was younger
@@WILLYLYNCH. defamation case based on domestic violence... so....
I feel so too. And not only domestic violence. any kind of abuse, in any environment and from all sorts of people. And poor Amber, she dug her hole VERY deep with those sneaky recordings.
AH's assertion that "pledged" and "donated" were interchangeable words settled it for me, not only because it spoke volumes about her relationship with the concept of "truth" but also because it demonstrated a scheming nature, i.e. her willingness to lie on-camera in an effort to feed the media material designed to manipulate public opinion in her favour.
It was worse that AH tried to compare it to buying a house! Lol 😆
Such a good point and so true! People might be able to fabricate or embellish here or there to a small extent and it doesn't mean that you are skeptical of everything they say... But with Amber, she told enough bald face lies, and as you alluded to, made it obvious how sinister she was, that you simply couldn't believe anything that came out of her mouth...
She is a despicable person, and that's what typically manifests when you are as disordered, clinically, as she is. Btw I think she likely has NPD as well, FWIW...
Plus the testimony by JD's accountant explaining that he on his own took the initiative to send the first installments directly to the charities and AH's lawyers ordered him to pay her instead. If her goal was truly to send that money to the charities there was no legitimate reason to waste time by adding extra steps in the process.
And her saying that the trial forced her to delay those payments while she had all the money on her account for more than one full year before she published the article that caused the trial. She's justifying a misdeed based on unforeseeable events that happened way later. That's another hint at her relation to the truth. She has zero issue with reordering a timeline over several months or years just to sell her narrative.
Yes, and as it turned out also being abused and being the abuser is interchangeable for her.
You NEED TO TAKE THIS DOWN!!!! ITS GOING TO RUIN JD VERDICT.!!!!
Before we believe this how about we verify that this is an actual Jury person.
Fascinating to finally hear what the jury was processing, what they picked up on and what they didn't. For the jury members who were still left with some empathy for AH after all her ridiculous machinations, I wonder if their perspective shifted at all after seeing the response of the vast majority of watchers.
I doubt it. If they were that ignorant of the mountains of evidence Depp's side presented and still champion her, they are lost in lala land.
He described their perspective as 'they defamed each other', so I would say probably not. The only thing they gave in her favour was the statement about the 2nd call to the police, roughing up the apartment, conspiracy with friends (an 'ambush' I think he said). Waldman called it a hoax in his other statements and they found in favour of Johnny. One might agree that the friends weren't actually part of a planned 'ambush' but reacted/were coerced into the hoax after the fact. Only one person corroborated any violence by Johnny - Ambers sister, and if you believe Jennifer Howell, then that's blown away.
How do we know this is real?
@@juliege2586 good point. I cant find any info on this anywhere else.
@@jodybobble Did the court watched whitney's uk testimony? Cause that seemed way off when i watched it.
Sounds like a fair and intelligent guy.
In fact, from what he said the jury took their job seriously and the outcome was just and balanced.
I call bullshit on this one. No juror would risk causing an appeal by doing this. This guy has a shady past of making things up take this video for what its worth.
how do we know they're even real when literally anyone can just go on social media and claim anything they want.
I hope he's careful with what he's saying bc her lawyers will be watching and waiting for one to say something that would cause misconduct and appeal.
That's what I thought.
Judge Penny said they could speak to the media if they wanted to but thier names old not be published for a year
Agree . So if he's watching Please jury guy don't say to much and plz don't answer any questions that could be misconstrued.
Someone dm him and tell him that!
I’ve already left a comment on something he said in comments that he needs to delete!
So disappointed in Amber’s attorney. I was really feeling so I for her but now I realize she speaks just like Amber. Why couldn’t she be honest! Doesn’t she know people can fact check all these things that she is saying about the UK trial
It’s obvs to me that Elaine is not just a lawyer to her. I’m positive that Elaine encourages her further & is apart of Ambers close circle.
We can't stand Amber Heard here in the UK. Johnny is being congratulated everywhere he goes here !!.
Birds of a feather..... 😒 Elaine can't take any responsibility nor will she stop!!! Both woman can't and won't let go!
Elaine will go to her grave insisting she was wronged by everyone in this case.
How about looking in the mirror and right next to you, Elaaaaaiiiiiiiiiinnnneeee?! 😜😏
The reason AH's attorney Elaine, acts like AH is that Elaine is actually AH's mother. Just kidding.
@@ginger19431 You are welcome xx
This is great. Thanks. Your recent videos are pulling things together.
Joseph Morris I’m very disappointed with this video.
This could be very damaging to your reputation and is hurting the case
I’m a JD supporter and I’m telling you
Please take the video down
It’s not good
I don’t like it
Must be satisfying for him to know the general public also saw what he felt about Amber. Confirmation that their gut was right.
Good point! It’s always nice to be validated.
Yes ! I'm so glad to hear a juror saying that Amber staring at them when answering questions made them uncomfortable. It was so phony. I'm sure someone told her to make eye contact so they will believe you. Instead it was just creepy. The jury just like everyone else saw through her lies.
She was probably trying to "flirt" with him to win him over. Glad he didn't fall for it.
One jury did liked Turd staring at them, she/he feels important!
Good job as always!!
There is no way to know if this is real, it could be anybody..
The juror sounds like they could see through Heard's maliciousness and lies! I only hope that with his honesty and the statements about the jury not being unanimous in the settlement amount gives Amber any ammunition in her hunt for an appeal, which should be denied the second it's filed since she's wasted enough of the courts time with her lies! The next time I want to see her in court again is hopefully when she has to answer for committing perjury under oath and filing false reports she made to the police and a TRO where she had to sign the report as true under penalty of perjury!
Yeah and she’s in big trouble with Australia for lying about her dogs, so she’s gonna have to face that matter she might get jail time and fines.
@@lildebra7941 also about the "glassing" incident, not sure what the statute of limitations are on that but it is now public record in America that she used a bottle in an assault which is illegal in Australia.
I hope she loses custody of her innocent daughter before she becomes her next victim
It has zero to do with an appeal. The jury was unanimous. That is why each one had to stand up and affirm they support the verdict the foreman read. There will be no successful appeal here. Elaine is running her mouth in ways that will likely get her disbarred like a trumper attorney. She is attacking the judge and jury with baseless accusations. I also think the early speculation that elaine is dating amber must be true, elaine is acting like a girlfriend on tv, not an attorney who submitted tons of false evidence in a trial. Elaine should be distancing, not doubling down.
Isn’t that the truth, Whitney will be her punching bag.
Thank you for bringing us this gem. Amber is found to be lying about everything and she comes out of court saying, "I let women down". Really?
Well she did let women down just not in the way she thinks
The only people she let down are real DV victims and herself. She really is a piece of work to think she can get away with her lies. Shame on her
Thank you for your service!
cannot confirm this guy is who he says he is, he may be someone working for ambers pr or a supporter trying to get fame. unless the juror tells the court they can release his name and it can be verified this could be me for all you know trolling you with a fake account.
It’s fake! Slow the voice down, It’s Morris the host of this channel Hes known for lying just to get views n likes