Jehovah's Witnesses SKETCHY Translation of the Bible (JWs made their OWN Bible)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- Jehovah's Witnesses SKETCHY Translation of the Bible (Made their own Bible). The New World Translation can't even be properly called a Bible because of all the intentional mistranslations in it.
For more on Jehovah's Witnesses, see our videos below here.
FULL JW VIDEOS:
1. The biggest error of the Jehovah's Witnesses: • The Single Biggest ERR...
2. Beliefs of the Jehovah's Witnesses: • The Beliefs and Teachi...
3. History of the Jehovah's Witnesses: • Jehovah Witness Origin...
4. True Stories of talking to Jehovah's Witnesses: • Catholic vs. Jehovah W...
5. A Prominent Jehovah's Witness converts to the Catholic Church: • From Jehovah's Witness...
QUESTIONS? Ask us here: www.subscribep...
FOLLOW CATHOLIC TRUTH:
Catholic Truth FAMILY (Advice on Love, Dating, Engagement, Marriage and Kids) / @catholictruthfamily
Podcast: www.buzzsprout...
Twitter: / catholictruth7
TikTok: "TheCatholicTruth" - / catholictruthofficial
Instagram: Catholic_Truth_Official
Facebook Page: bit.ly/3eDvMO8
Facebook Group Page: / catholictruthct
Blog: thecatholictru...
Rumble: rumble.com/use...
APOLOGETICS TRAININGS:
Would you like 1-on-1 Apologetics training with Bryan? Or a chance to ask questions or get advice? Contact Catholic Truth: info@CatholicTruth.org
Need a Speaker or Retreat? CatholicTruth.org
Online Confirmation Retreat: catholictruth....
MERCH: thecatholictru...
Like our shirts? Designed by Glorybound Apparel: gloryboundco.com/
NEW AGE BOOK: Counterfeit Spirituality (Yoga, Reiki, Astrology, Law of Attraction, etc.)
Our Sunday Visitor: bit.ly/3vtK63Z
Amazon: amzn.to/3e1BqMk
Also see Barnes & Nobles, etc.
BOOK: "WHY Do You Believe In GOD?" amzn.to/33iZSk3
Related searches: Jehovah witness bible translation, jw bible
Music Credit: http//www.bensound.com
I studied with the JWs for about 9 months, don't judge they were the first church I checked out when I started believing in God. Anyway the first stumbling block for me was John 1.1 their version says the word was 'a' God. I said to my instructor "didn't jehovah say in Isiah that "I know of no other gods" my instructors looked at eachother with a hard look and he said let's skip that question for now. Just trust in the lord and die patient, that I don't have the wisdom yet to understand why that's not a problem. They never got back to it so more of these stumbling blocks started forming till I was tripping everywhere! Eventually I had enough and left, they scheduled for me to discuss these things with the elder at the hall but I didn't even keep the appointment.
They stalked me for a couple weeks after that as well... looking back I'm sure they were just concerned. I totally ghosted them after I realized that both Daniel and John the revelator see St Michael and the son of man in their prophecies and neither mentions that they're the same being. It was like ok this whole JW thing is BS. I stopped trusting all Christians after that and stuck to the Bible only. I figured every denominstion out there just cherry picks the bible to build their theologies. No theology is perfect so why be a part of a church at all? Ended up a calvinist for 10 years with a low church mentality. I went to a presby church but never settled on a denomination before being confirmed this easter. I'm now catholic and sooooo much confusion has been cleared up. I've been obsessed with catholic apologetics like a thirst I can't quench. I just love how true it is... when I was with the witnesses, they called catholics counterfeit christians but the opposite is true by every metric and its super easy to prove.
Thank you so much for sharing. So glad you saw the problematic aspects. And I totally understand the Catholic apologetic subsession. When everything makes sense, and you just can't get enough. It's like putting puzzle pieces in place and seeing the whole puzzle picture.
Wow! What a journey!
I am Catholic as well.
@@badjinacecile391 thats awesome. I love to be a part of the church's growth.
You’ve been freed “for His yoke is light.”
Please Don't let that cult keep you from believing in Jesus and God! Actually the Greek Linear Translation written in 1906, published by Watch Tower regarding John 1:1 is as follows: According to their own translation, God is given 2 names: the 2nd name given is "Outoc" or "THYTOZ," which interpreted from the Greek means the "Word." Jehovah Witnesses interpretation is as follows: In the beginning the word was, and the word was with God, and the word was 'a god.' This one was in the beginning with God." Jesus was the "word" of God. This scripture according to the interpretation of the Jehovah Witnesses disproves their "False Doctrine" that Jesus was the Arch Angel Michael! It upholds His Diety as the Son of God and if God the Father said" Here is my son...He died for you ..he is the only mediator..." I will my knee to the name of Jesus!
Thank you Bryan. My sister-in-law who is Jehova Witness kept telling me as a young girl (her and my brother kept trying to witness to me but I was never interested) that it was the same Bible. They go specifically to Catholics and show them "it's the same Bible". And so many Catholics fall into the trap because they really believe the Jehovah Witness Bible and Catholic bible are the same. Not sure if my brother and sister-in-law really believe/know they are the same or not. As I got older, I started noticing differences....and big differences too. Thank you for educating us on this. I pray many people watch this.
Even when u show them the difference in meaning of the verses, they will say it is the same🤦♂️
@@frankle9617 Yes, I know. 😣😥
facts i show my twin sister on how there many verses missing me and my older sister both try to get her the truth she still denied it @@frankle9617
Catholicism is also a cult, they teach a false gospel!
@@frankle9617 Really? Try me then.
i invite them in and ask them why they are here. They tell me about Jehovah and how he wants to have a new world. I ask them if Jehovah has all wisdom and power? they say YES! I ask to look at their Bible. I turn it to 1 Cor. 1:24 where it says 'Christ, the Power and Wisdom of God" They don't know what to say and leave
Lol
One should never willingly who knows allow a Jehovah witness in there home. Not just Jehovah witnesses but all clut Religions. For it opens the door to evil and can open the door for evil spirits to take possession. One must always be careful on who they allow in their home.
I always step outside to talk to them and will never accept their poison they try handing you to read.
Im not trying to tell people to live in fear but to always be mindful.
One True God , one True Religion , one true Church. The Catholic Church.
@@user-yf5fo7xj2y Planting seeds with them is fine. I evangelize them and got two JW"s to leave that wicked faith
@@EdwardGraveline Wow! That’s great! They can be so entrenched.
It makes sense. Am I missing something here?
This breaks my hert yall beleive this😢 jehovah witnesses r good people
I saw some Jehovah's Witnesses on a bridge overlooking the Tennessee River, they asked me to speak to them and I made the sign of the cross and said "I am a proud Roman Catholic and I follow the one true Church" they tried to clap back as I walked away and ignored them, they are lost and misguided souls, I wish to not have unification with them since they are so far gone, Jesus will correct them one day when it is right
It's easy just preach to them basic stuff they contradict the bible with .
Jesus is the One we ought to follow...read other translations of the Bible please.There was alot of dark times that arose because of Catholicism...please read up on the history of Christiniaty.Yes we should just trust the Holy Spirit....it's good to he informed but stay focused on what's important to God and Jesus
J.W edited the bible
And
Mormons added the book of mormon which has nothing to do with real scripture .
And then Helen Schucman channelled Jesus and wrote a new 'bible'
You call Catholics a lie but you follow a faith that started in 1870 you think all Christians for generations had no way to salvation only you and your buddies who found the truth in the late 1800s
Again Jesus said, “Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.” 22 And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive anyone’s sins, their sins are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”
@@julianapatrick7451 JW's are simply being good Protestants. Their religion is a natural result of the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura.
@@julianapatrick7451 Do you believe that when St. John the Baptist was baptizing people in the Jordan, that families left their infants, toddlers and small children behind? That makes no sense. They absolutely were baptized with the rest of the family. No where does the Bible say one must be “of knowledgeable age.”
@@julianapatrick7451 One thing is true. You do not have any knowledge of the One Holy Catholic Apostolic Church. I invite you to read some Catholic books before making all of these false statements. Then pick one of your claims and show proof. This may be interesting.
The member of Jehovah witnesses door to door spread their catechism
So did a few others make their own manmade bible sadly to fit their agenda:( Have two sweet JW at my apt complex the nicest of guys that I love but creepy religion! The guy who started this religion I used to walk by his old house in Normal Heights in San Deigo C.A. it is still there today ,he was a peddler a snake oil salesman before he started the fake religion! Then there is my sweet childhood friend saying sola scriptura lol but her scripture came from ours, help us Jesus!
People used to always say we had our own Bible I used to defuse it , but they were right
What does your comment mean? It doesn't make sense grammatically.
Do you mean that when you were a JW, people used to tell you that you had your own bible but you had been taught to explain it away without believing it to be true. But now to realise that it is true?
The JW that I have spoken to know that their bible is different from all the rest. They did try to claim that NWT is just a different translation and not the only one to have those differences, but when questioned further they were not able to name another translation and admitted that their bible fundamentally different.
Its a translation of Greek. That's how it started. We haven't changed passages. We believe our translation is correct. Take the word stauros. Its found in the Greek texts. Its what jesus was crucified on. It translates to tree or stake. Google the word if you'd like. Find it in the Greek texts
I’m a born in JW who left the faith. They do indeed have their own translation of the scriptures. I was one of the sisters who attended Pioneer School (for those who devote 70 hrs per month to preaching) and we were told by the man conducting the school to throw away any other Bible translation because they are demonic. They have their own bible and refuse to read any other translations with non JWs.
Thank you for sharing!
They read my bible when I held it next to theirs to show them the differences.
I also asked them to search for John 1:1 in Bible Hub to show all of the popular translations side by side - they refused!
@wordforever117 The NWT's rendering of the anarthrous predicate theos at John 1.1c as indefinite, "a god", is correct. There is nothing in the grammar or the context to understand it as definite, "God." Most scholars up to date with their studies of the Greek recognise this. Comparing Bible translations proves little and does not show which is the correct translation. By the way, I own copies of over 50 English Bible translations. I have no need to go to any 'Bible hub'.
With your own argument you can use it the other way as well . The majority of Greek scholars do render it as the word was God because they understand the account of what the apostle John is telling us. Right from the 1st verse to the confession of Thomas
Any time you encounter JW's, do not get into any Biblical discussions because you will be speaking two different languages.
Only talk about their Bible and try and get them to tell you where it came from because that is the sole authority of their "faith."
Emphasis that if that's their faith then they should know EVERYTHING about it, especially who created the Bible which is the Catholic Church.
Our approach, per recommendation of former Witnesses is to talk about the Watchtower authority and how its not credible especially with all of their false predictions of the end of the world. ruclips.net/video/2lma9la6ca0/видео.html
The only thing you need to do is discuss common doctrines
Like
If they believe in the TRINITY ?
Ask how can you biblically explain their faith is the Church Jesus started?
Is Jesus God ?
How did they get scripture?
"who created the Bible which is the Catholic Church." If you could only actually parse that fact correctly in your mind.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial eventually that is how all the abrahamic religions will be disproved: By the lack of returning messiahs. Mormonism will go first since they've called the times the "latter days" meaning that at the time of the founding we were at least half way to the return of the messiah. When he doesn't show in 3660, they'll have been disproven. Same with the rest in a few more tens of thousands of years.
I believe it was 5 "translators" - Nathan H Knorr, Frederick W Franz, Albert D Schroeder, George D Gangas and Milton G Henscel. Only Franz had any training in Greek or Hebrew, but not enough to even translate one line of Genesis when tested under oath in court.
That is what I have read about it. Is this correct? I want to get it right when I talk to these people on the street.
That’s incorrect.
@@RiskeFactorIt is only incorrect if you are a JW member. Because the Watchtower lies to you
Bought a copy at a thrift shop for $1.00. It's as bad as you'd think.
You overpaid!😅
Google lies about their bible being the most translated when in reality it's not and Google really needs to come to their senses and change that
Even the foundation is bigoted
Just another Doomsday Cult.🥱
Catholics and Jehovah's witnesses are cults, you need the TRUE JESUS of the Bible, not a religion
The JW bible is sketchy AT BEST.
LMAO It follows the King James Bible except for adding Jehovah 237 times in the new testament. The new King James Bible actually says the same thing as the NWT Bible you just haven't looked at the bottom of the page at the NU text.
@ScottRock-mr6qk what a load of utter bollox. I could quote many scriptures, but John 1.1 alone does not say a god. Keep reading and learning sunshine 🤦🏻♀️
@li2h6 And I'll point you to Zechariah 12:8, Galatians 4:14 and Daniel 3:24-28 do that you may see who Jesus truly was before he came to earth as a man. And speak English because I have no idea what Bollox is. If that's a slang cuss word, aren't you the true Christian. Potty mouth.
@li2h6 And I spent 5 years reading 5 different translations of the Bible sunshine. I have extensive knowledge of what's in all those Bible's and John 1:1 doesn't effect how I think or feel for Jesus because I know exactly who God truly is and its not Jesus pal. Try Exodus 6:3 in your King James Bible. Oh and Genesis 22:14 and Exodus 17:15 and Judges 6:24 and Psalms 83:18 and Isaiah 12:2 and Isaiah 26:4. That should tell you who God Almighty truly is. Potty mouth. And yes im fully aware of his name being YHWH but Yeshua without the vowels is YSH NOT YHWH so still that's not Jesus. And Isaiah 60:16 says They will certainly have to know that I am the LORD your Savior, and the powerful one of Jacob is your repurchaser. The powerful one of Jacob is Jesus, just like Isaiah 10:21 says he is as does Luke 1:32, 33. So who that at Isaiah 60:16 that's called LORD your Savior???? Yeah it ain't Jesus potty mouth. Do yourself a favor and go wash your mouth out with soap and then read your Bible to fully know who Jesus was before he came to earth as a man. Potty mouth.
Here’s a question for everyone. What translation do you use the most?
The Third Millennium Bible and the KJV (tie), with the Orthodox Study Bible and the RSVCE as close seconds.
I have a Douay Rheims in English and a Jerusalem in Italian.
RSV-CE 2
@@CatholicTruthOfficial I use the NABRE but I worry at Bible study I couldn’t find the verse that the pastor was on. Either it was a different verse than what they were on or something else.
Comme catholique, La Bible de Jérusalem et la Traduction œcuménique de la Bible.
They are the nicest people, I give them that. Still studying.
Until you're not interested in what they have to say Then they don't become so nice anymore. Or if you have questions and disagree with the organization, they cease to be friendly anymore as well. I know many people who are kicking up just for asking simple questions.
It’s a cult, do some research about them.
My parents are JW and I’m an ex jw who has not been disfellowshipped. My mother told me from her own mouth the only reason she still associates with me is because I have her only grandchildren. Please don’t get mixed up in this religion. It’s love bombing until you get baptized. Then you’re on your own.
It is a doomsday cult please research before joining listen to ex JWs stories there are many. People don't buy houses without doing research.... the same method should apply before joining a religion.
They told me I practised paganism. I asked them "in what way?" but then they packed up their cart and left.
Wondering why😢
I look at the works and what they teach that they are God's people. ❤ I see that Jehovah's Witnesses follow the truth. They are loyal to the one true God of the Bible and are clearly led by the Holy Spirit. They follow Jesus and they are driven by love for Jehovah and their fellow human beings. They have an undeserved bad reputation. Much exaggeration and lies are directed at them. Much injustice is done to them. But that's the way it should be. Jesus was also treated this way. The devil is desperate, he knows he has little time left.
Charles Russel was taken to court and asked if he could speak Greek he said yes and then when asked if he could translate certain words they gave him in greek he knew none of them. 🤦♂️
Lol. That’s a complete misrepresentation of what took place.
@@RiskeFactorthank you for your comment because it led me to look up Charles Russell and read more about him. Wow, if only being untrained in Greek was the worst you could say about him….
@@pm1783 he sure had his issues…unlike Pope John XII. 🤔
I’d be more concerned about the Catholic history of persecuting and the murdering of many for religious dominance reasons
Well, what is as it should be? Because there like over 5 translations that are all acceptable.
As an atheist who has read many different versions of the Bible, I think the Jehovah's Witness version is one of the less accurate versions.
This is a very strange comment.
Wow, that's completely nonsensical! More people should be aware of this.
Far be it from me to defend the New World Translation Jehovah's Witnesses Bible, but on the other hand who doesn't have their own translation (interpretation) of the Holy Scriptures these days?
True, but some are just much worse than others.
It is not merely a different translation...there are differences that change the meaning of the passage is major ways...like Jesus is not God, but a god, Jesus is not eternal, the blood of Jesus is not divine and Jesus is a secondary creator - these differences are directly opposed to the fundamentals of Christianity.
What is more, is that it looks very much like a deliberate act to affirm the unique beliefs they had prior to this "translation" being published.
I keep hearing this accusation.
But what are the actual differences aside from words like "cross" & "church"? And side from the ye olde style...
Or is this just haters being "our bible is the greater than yours"?
i actually would like to know the differences that "EVERYONE" likes to point out...
I did see a difference (not much of a difference) in ezekiel with the description of Satan's arrainment??
Because people were like "Satan" was the "Angel of Music", which they extrapolated from "their translations", which i thought just sounds stupid because king david was a musician and psalms means songs so that doesn't quite make sense.
There's a ton of differences, actually. You can look them up online. One of the biggest is that in John 1:1. It says Jesus was God. The JW book changes it to Jesus was 'a' God. So apparently, there's more than one God now. And any and all passages referring to Jesus being worshiped, they changed the word worship because they don't believe he is God.
I’m a Catholic and former Jehovah’s Witness. I appreciate the work you do and I follow you regularly, but your information here is incorrect. This bible, while not a good translation, is still a fairly reliable translation in most cases.
Many passages have been altered to support their Arian doctrine, also the name "Jehovah" was imposed everywhere....what reliability are you seeing there?
@@angelicalee6 I’m not saying I agree with using Jehovah in the New Testament, or other differences from more traditional versions,however the use of the name is supported by 25 different older Hebrew translations of the New Testament. Also the use of the indefinite article at John 1:1 is supported by 7 different older translations of the New Testament such as “The New Testament, in an Improved Version” copyright 1808. Again I don’t agree with this but they are not doing so without support.
@@billfold1717 Our Lord Jesus did not teach us to call Him Jehovah. We should listen.
@angelicalee6 exodus 6:3 in the bible it says gods name is jehovah
@@dannyalvarez9051 Jehovah is the transliteration of the tetragrammatom and the vowels of Adonai (LORD) God's name most likely pronunciation is "Yahweh" We know this translates to english as "I AM"
Did you know many other religions have there own Bible too not just JW's?
Like who? The Jehovah's Witnesses is notable because none of the people who translated it knew any biblical Greek. Plus, it diverges from the rest of the Christian translations severely.
Judaism
I'm almost 100% sure that wasn't translated by their own native speakers too
Hebrew is a dead language
The reason I say Hebrew is a dead language because it's not the same Hebrew spoken today
When I heard them mocking the Trinity, I knew they were completely off track.
The bible mocks the trinity. Matthew 3:17
@@snap-off5383 JW's are simply being good Protestants. Their religion is a natural result of the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura.
@@snap-off5383 Your interpretation is out there. 🪐🔭
Well the trinity wasn’t created till 300 years after Jesus’s death and the old testament never mentioned a trinity either n even in the New Testament their is many contradictions in it and most theologians say the trinity is to inconsistent and to contradictory to be taken as fact and the Bible never says the holy spirt is a body but a force but the Bible is for interpretation so anyone can interpret it how they see fit ig
Yes the JW Organization have their own Bible but what’s more Interesting is they changed Bible passages to fit their belief system. For example at Colossians 1:16 In the KJV it says Jesus created all things,in the NWT it says Jesus created all other things. Another example is at John 1:1 where they really alter the scripture to fit their belief system that Jesus was created.
The NWT is being accurate at both these places, namely, Colossians 1.16 and John 1.1.
@@brucebarnard It isn't being accurate.
@@brucebarnard "16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him." And, the greek also agree with the "all things were created".
@misterauctor7353 As I've written elsewhere about this. The Son is said to be the πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως(v.15) which is undoubtedly partitive genitive and which means the "firstborn" is part of the group "all creation", that the firstborn is itself a created being, the first one that was created. Also, the Greek verbs Paul uses from v.16 onwards are all *passive* , which shows it is not the Son who is the source of creation, but another is, it being the Father. The Son is the agent that the Father used to create "all things.". Hence, it is the case that these τὰ πάντα, "all things" of v.16 are not the equivalent of πάσης κτίσεως, "all creation," of v.15, and so then are all *other* things that were created by the Father through the agency of the Son. A translation can bring this out by using the English word "other," making what is implicit in the Greek explicit in the English translation. (Compare Acts 5.29, where most translations have the English word "other," though there is no equivalent word in the actual Greek.)
@@brucebarnard " firstborn is itself a created being"
Firstborn has to do with ranks.
Quote: "There are several issues with the comment:
Misunderstanding of πρωτότοκος (firstborn):
The comment interprets πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως (firstborn of all creation) as meaning the firstborn is a created being. However, in Greek usage and within the context of Colossians 1:15, πρωτότοκος does not denote temporal priority but rather preeminence or supremacy. It signifies the Son's unique and highest status over all creation, not that he is part of creation.
Interpretation of Greek verbs as passive:
The comment states that the Greek verbs Paul uses from verse 16 onwards are all passive, indicating that it is the Father who is the source of creation, not the Son. This interpretation is not accurate. In Colossians 1:16, while there are passive verbs ("were created"), the context clearly identifies the Son as the agent of creation ("all things were created by him"). The passive verbs indicate the reception of action, not the source.
Equating τὰ πάντα (all things) with πάσης κτίσεως (all creation):
The comment suggests that τὰ πάντα (all things) in verse 16 are not equivalent to πάσης κτίσεως (all creation) in verse 15. However, grammatically and contextually, Paul uses these terms to emphasize the comprehensive nature of the Son's role in creation. They are not intended to be mutually exclusive but rather complementary in describing the extent of the Son's creative agency.
Translation suggestion:
The comment proposes translating πάντα (all things) as "other things" to distinguish it from πάσης κτίσεως (all creation). This translation suggestion is unnecessary and imposes a distinction that is not present in the Greek text.
In summary, the comment shows a misunderstanding of Greek grammar, semantic nuances, and the theological context of Colossians 1:15-16. It incorrectly interprets πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως as implying the Son is a created being, misinterprets the passive verbs as indicating the Father as the creator rather than the Son, and proposes a translation that does not accurately reflect the intended meaning of the original text. These issues stem from a lack of familiarity with Greek language nuances and theological interpretation principles."
the only reason why they changed it because ppl didnt know the meanings of most words(e.g thee, thy thou)
People knew the meaning for 1800 years before JWs. No one who translated their original Bible even knew the biblical languages.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial 2024?
Did you know most religions have their own bibles❤ Did you know their Bible is much easier to understand than any other Bible.
It doesn't matter if it's easy to understand if it's wrong.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial how so may it be wrong.
Among many other glaring scholars pointed out by scholars, they changed all passages regarding the divinity of Christ. John 1:1 for example. It says that the Word was with God and the Wold was God. But the JW Bible says, was 'A' God.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial a lot of other scripture alludes to the fact that Jesus may very well be a god but not god. So the question then becomes is the scripture being changed or fixed.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Jesus is the son of Jehovah and Jehovah approved jesus and gave him his high ruling position. Jesus says himself that all his power has been given him. He was the firstborn of all creatures but god is described as a being with no beginning or end. God says you can’t see my face or you will die. Everyone saw Jesus so who are we talking about you might ask, maybe it’s the one and only god that gave Jesus his power. (Jehovah is god’s name that is mentioned in king James also btw, not a whole different god)
Poor souls 😢
Indeed. Pray for them.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Most Precious Blood of Jesus Christ save us and the whole world!
They teaching us here archangel Michael is the other name of Jesus Christ
Don’t listen to them
Where does it say that in the bible?
@@Bobby-xr4bo when They spread their teaching they didn't tell ua if they a new sect/New religion, they just tell us they want my friend and me to join and learning holy bible
@@CatholicTruthOfficial I saw in their book, and i have it
@@floraricemamul9979 get yourself a good Catholic Bible such as the RSV and compare with what they give you..
can you give me the evidence pls
Same as protestants,changed bible to fit their dogmas, even that protestants change it a bit, but JW made their own mad thing and act how they discover some ancient Truth their find , even that they recycle just old gnostic ideas
Oh that's unfortunate! I got this bible for free and liked the cover. 😂
Sorry! The Gideon Bible Foundation would send you one for free too I believe.
According to the book of Revelation “The True Church Of The Living GOD are those whose Robes are wash In The Blood Of The Lamb ❤
They changed the bible to say that "purchased the church of God with the blood of His own son" rather than "His own blood"
But it still says that the Holy Spirit did this purchase, not the Father. Which makes no sense in their version and perfect sense the in true version. But you can at least tell them that their bible says that the Holy Spirit is equal to the Father seeing as Jesus is their son.
Who were the translater i want the names please
Thanks for the question. Nathan Knorr, Albert Schroeder, Fredrick Franz, and George Gangas.
These are the presumed names of the committee, who have co-ordinated the translation work. Whether Franz was the sole translator is unknown.
The Catholics also have their own Bible. They changed the commandments of God to fit their own narratives
Actually, Catholics have the original Bible. They didn't change any commandments.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial no, brother. Read the Catechism and you’ll find that the Catholic church changed many things including the 4th commandment of God. Your leaders themselves admit that the Catholic church has no scriptural authority to do that…
Why get a Greek expert if you’re gonna skip
1900y ? Makes no sense.
Exactly
@@CatholicTruthOfficial are you referring to their older bible or the current silver bibles they use? The new silver one is even more inaccurate and has been changed even from the older NWT versions 😮
Please tell their errors
Did you know that on psalms 83;18 the king James most trusted Bible n the jw Bible r the only ones that call GOD Jehova
Jehovah is a faulty translation. It was never heard of before the 1200s.
Did you know Jehovah's witnesses are not even classed by the Roman Catholic Church as being Christian at all, because they have this blizzard stance that Jesus is actually Saint Michael , yes according go them, Saint Micheal was already in heaven, he morphed into Jesus for his earthly ministry, then morphed back into Saint Michael when he went back to heaven, this belief is so wacko and out of line with Church teaching, they ard not even considered Protestant. Why don't you do a video on that Mr Mercier assuming You haven't already, God bless and may Christ be with the UNDEBUNKABLE DEBUNKER Amen🙏.
Yea I know that it’s crazy
That's good brings different character future cards
No one know greek/ hebrew? Cheap book then
Catholic also have their own Bible
The original Bible.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial how come your original is so different from the dead sea scroll
Do a search on the kJ bible. See how many errors you find.
We have, and all scholars say there's errors.
Being a Jehovah’s Witness I unfortunately have to agree on this. The New World Translation twists so many bible verses to comply with our current held believes. If only the top of Jehovah’s Witnesses had the courage to pick up the bible and read it how it was reveald to us by God. And then would think of how their teachings should match the bible. It is after all the Word of God only when it is not adulterated.
Well said!
The system of jws beliefs keep changing... God does not change. Very simple.
Partly why people are leaving. I certainly wasn't happy as a JW to learn they Bible's been edited to match man made doctrine. But I ultimately Left the cult for other reasons.
@@ramrod576 wow. Never heard that before. Knowing their bible is corrupted is a big deal for everybody.
I've been trying to get their NWT but I can't seem to find it. I collect Bibles.
Any advice on how to get one? I want to compare it with my great adventure catholic bible
Just go to their "church" and ask them for one. We've done that a few times
@@CatholicTruthOfficial thanks!
@@ThinkLuckyThinkalternatively, if you can’t get a physical Bible right away, you can search it on their jw website and read it there to compare translations
JWs dont sell their Bibles but individuals sell them on line. Maybe former JWs or people that studied and have them.
So, their translator was the KJV. Lol
@@deleteduser1892 The end-result, yes.
Ultimately, since no translation was really offered, in my eyes: they just took the KJV and edited it from there.
It seems like they translated the KJV into modern English and along the way changed any scripture that described Jesus as divine, making sure to put an excuse for doing so in the footnotes. There are a LOT of footnotes in the NWT!!!
@@wordforever117 That's why we use the Catholic Christian Douay-Rheims, not the non-Christian New World Translation from the JWs who say Jesus was just the archangel St. Michael.
@@batmaninc2793Oh yeh the NWT is only for JWs. It is completely wrong, and I say said before, I think intentionally wrong to back up their invented doctrine.
Just like when Martin Luther inserted the word "alone" after "faith" in his first translation.
Extremely dodgy behaviour!
Btw, I use the Jerusalem Bible with Grail Psalms because it matches the lectionary in the UK, which is kind of handy!
@@wordforever117 Interesting.
I've kinda been going back and forth between one from Baronious Press in DRC, The Didache Bible, and a vest-pocket sized ESV for the NT with Psalms and Proverbs.
Not the preferred, but, it really is pocket-sized and I bring it everywhere because of that.
JW's are simply being good Protestants. Their religion is a natural result of the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura.
💯
Along with sola scripture, they allow a small group of men in NY translate bible passages to them. The teachings only “pass” if there is a 2/3rds vote to pass it. It’s not holy spirit directed. Former jw here 😊
Look up their extreame shunning practices and you tell me if they are really "good"
Don't call nick Jesus of your preast ser. Jesus I am Rahab God Jesus bibles are all about same all evil but Rahab family Mathew 12.42 Ezekiel
False information
Yeah, you can't name even one thing said that was false? It's not false. Don't ignore truth.
How?
Nothing is different from the holy Bible & there Bible only thing that is different holy Bible says god & they Bible say Jehovah
Jehovah is my father
Yahweh. But yes. Us too.
i think the Vatican is sketchy and the KJV all the same.
No that's not true. They adopted their Bible they don't have their own. Why are you so concerned about something that you have no business being concerned??? Does anyone come bashing your King James Bible and believe me there are faults with the King James Bible. So get a LIFE
We don't go by the King James Bible. ;)
God bless you.
@CatholicTruthOfficial And that's obvious because I know ya'll use a Catholic Bible that has seven extra books in it, and I've read some of ya'lls Bible, too. Still you shouldn't go around bashing other people's Bible's or beliefs because ya'll have some messed up beliefs yourselves. Oh and I didn't realize that I was actually talking with the Catholic people and if I am, well them let me just say that your church leaders are in some trouble when the poop hits the fan. God isnt too happy with them. Saying that they are God on earth (Leo XIII) and changing his day of rest from Saturday to Sunday. Yeah he's gonna wreak havoc on them.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial And Bless you too.
Provide one example where they are wrong then.
One example: They predicted the world to end in 1914 (and many other times) and failed. The Bible says that if you predict something in the name of the Lord, and it doesn't come to pass, then you are a false prophet and should not be listened to.
@@deleteduser1892 In John 1:1 there are two different Greek words to describe two divine beings.
Jesus "The Word" is theos ( God or a god). The one that he was with however is ton theon ( The God)
This highlights how Jesus is a divine being and yet distinct from his father Jehovah who is Almighty God.
In everything Jesus did whether in heaven or earth Jesus is always a subordinate of the God he himself worshiped.
Nowhere in scripture were the discipline told to pray to Jesus or worship him.
Sure, as God's foremost apostle, high priest, and chosen king we do obeisances to Jesus( proskeneo) bowing before him, as it were, but this doesn't mean we worship him the way Jehovah, his God and Father is worshiped, or that we replace Jehovah with Jesus. That would be idolatry.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial they didn't predict anything. What they did do is discuss, and highlight, chronology which was already in the Bible.
They don't claim to be inspired or infallible or that they completely understood everything due to happen without any further fine tuning.
We still hold to the date 1914 as the year" The Times of The Nation's" ended, Luke 21:24.
In a nutshell Jesus now rules in heaven as the heir of the Davidic throne, God's chosen king.
Soon he will seperate the sheep from the goats, Matthew 25:31-32 and as lord of lords and King of Kings he is going to war against and replace all human governments, Revelation 19:15,16.
So rather than condemn Jehovah's Witnesses here on earth you should like them recognise Jesus's kingship and do good to his oppressed brothers because thats the same as doing good to him:
" In reply the king will say to them truly I say to you to the extent that you did it to one of the least of these my brothers you did it to me, " Matthew 25:40
@@deleteduser1892 John used theos god in contrast to ton theon The God in this instance to demonstrate the divine nature of Christ as a mighty supernatural spirit being who was with God, depicting two distinct beings, not the same God as later trinitarians insist, something John had no concept of at all.
This is emphasized again in John 1:18 where it literally reads: "No man has seen God at any time; the only-begotten god who is at the Father’s side is the one who has explained Him."
@@deleteduser1892 bowing, and prostrating as in the act of proskeneo does not always mean worship: "Then David got up and went out from the cave and called out after Saul: “My lord the king!” When Saul looked behind him, David bowed down low with his face to the ground and prostrated himself," 1Samuel 24:8.
David certainly wasn't worshiping Saul, his Lord and King, and neither were Jesus's disciples worshiping Jesus when they performed similar acts of obeisance before him; likewise, however they recognised him as Lord and King:
"...look! astrologers from the East came to Jerusalem, saying: “Where is the one born king of the Jews? For we saw his star when we were in the East, and we have come to do obeisance to him, " Matthew 2:1-2.
You should fully know ur facts before making a video on half the facts please.
Feel free to say one thing that was wrong.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial It's wrong for you to make accusations without giving a single example and the valid reason/ facts why syntax, etymology, writer's style, scripturally, historically or otherwise. So it's on you that can present one that is absolutely irrefutable
@@jahtruthdefender
What reputable scholars say about the New World Translation of John 1:1:
Barclay: Dr. William Barclay, a leading Greek scholar of the University of Glasgow, Scotland: "The deliberate distortion of truth by this sect is seen in their New testament translations. John 1:1 is translated: '...the Word was a god, ' a translation which is grammatically impossible...It is abundantly clear that a sect which can translate the New Testament like that is intellectually dishonest."
Bowman, Robert Bowman, All scholars agree that in John 1:1 "logos" is the subject and "theos" is the predicate. This sets the translation of John 1:1c as, (The Word was God" not "God was the Word". Jehovah's Witnesses, Jesus Christ, and the Gospel of John.)
Boyer: Dr. James L. Boyer of Winona Lake, Indiana: "I have never heard of, or read of any Greek Scholar who would have agreed to the interpretation of this verse insisted upon by the Jehovah's Witnesses...I have never encountered one of them who had any knowledge of the Greek language."
Bruce: Dr. F. F. Bruce of the University of Manchester, England: "Much is made by Arian amateur grammarians of the omission of the definite article with 'God' in the phrase 'And the Word was God.' Such an omission is common with nouns in a predicative construction...'a god' would be totally indefensible." [Barclay and Bruce are generally regarded as Great Britain's leading Greek scholars. Both have New Testament translations in print!]
Colwell: Dr. Ernest C. Colwell of the University of Chicago: "A definite predicate nominative has the article when it follows the verb; it does not have the article when it precedes the verb...this statement cannot be regarded as strange in the prologue of the gospel which reaches its climax in the confession of Thomas. 'My Lord and my God.' - John 20:28"
Feinberg: Dr. Charles L. Feinberg of La Mirada, California: "I can assure you that the rendering which the Jehovah's Witnesses give John 1:1 is not held by any reputable Greek scholar."
Griesbach: Dr. J. J. Griesbach (whose Greek text - not the English part - is used in the Emphatic Diaglott): "So numerous and clear are the arguments and testimonies of Scriptures in favor of the true Deity of Christ, that I can hardly imagine how, upon the admission of the Divine authority of Scripture, and with regard to fair rules of interpretation, this doctrine can by any man be called in doubt. Especially the passage, John 1:1-3, is so clear and so superior to all exception, that by no daring efforts of either commentators or critics can it be snatched out of the hands of the defenders of the truth."
Johnson: Dr. J. Johnson of California State University, Long Beach: "No justification whatsoever for translating THEOS EN HO LOGOS as 'the Word was a god.' There is no syntactical parallel to Acts 28:6 where there is a statement in indirect discourse; John 1:1 is direct....I am neither a Christian nor a Trinitarian."
Kaufman: Dr. Paul L. Kaufman of Portland, Oregon: "The Jehovah's Witnesses people evidence an abysmal ignorance of the basic tenets of Greek grammar in their mistranslation of John 1:1."
Mantey: "I have never read any New Testament so badly translated as The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of The Greek Scriptures.... it is a distortion of the New Testament. The translators used what J.B. Rotherham had translated in 1893, in modern speech, and changed the readings in scores of passages to state what Jehovah's Witnesses believe and teach. That is a distortion not a translation." (Julius Mantey, Depth Exploration in The New Testament (N.Y.: Vantage Pres, 1980), pp.136-137)
Mantey: "Well, as a backdrop, I was disturbed because they (Watchtower) had misquoted me in support of their translation." (These words were excerpted from the tape, "Martin and Julius Mantey on The New World Translation", Mantey is quoted on pages 1158-1159 of the Kingdom interlinear Translation)
Mantey: Dr. Julius Mantey, author of A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament, calls the NWT "a shocking mistranslation." "Obsolete and incorrect." "It is neither scholarly nor reasonable to translate John 1:1 'The Word was a god.'"
Mantey: the translators of the NWT are "diabolical deceivers." (Julius Mantey in discussion with Walter Martin)
Martin: Dr. Walter R. Martin (who does not teach Greek but has studied the language): "The translation...'a god' instead of 'God' is erroneous and unsupported by any good Greek scholarship, ancient or contemporary and is a translation rejected by all recognized scholars of the Greek language may of whom are not even Christians, and cannot fairly be said to be biased in favor of the orthodox contention."
Metzger: Dr. Bruce M. Metzger, professor of New Testament at Princeton University, calls the NWT "a frightful mistranslation," "Erroneous" and "pernicious" "reprehensible" "If the Jehovah's Witnesses take this translation seriously, they are polytheists." (Professor of New Testament Language and Literature)
Mikolaski: Dr. Samuel J. Mikolaski of Zurich, Switzerland: "This anarthrous (used without the article) construction does not mean what the indefinite article 'a' means in English. It is monstrous to translate the phrase 'the Word was a god.'"
Nida: "With regard to John 1:1, there is of course a complication simply because the New World Translation was apparently done by persons who did not take seriously the syntax of the Greek." (Dr. Eugene A. Nida, head of Translations Department, American Bible Society: Responsible for the Good News Bible - The committee worked under him.)
Rowley: British scholar H.H. Rowley stated, "From beginning to end this volume is a shining example of how the Bible should not be translated."
Wescott: Dr. B. F. Wescott (whose Greek text - not the English part - is used in the Kingdom Interlinear Translation): "The predicate (God) stands emphatically first, as in IV.24. It is necessarily without the article...No idea of inferiority of nature is suggested by the form of expression, which simply affirms the true deity of the Word...in the third clause 'the Word' is declared to be 'God' ans so included in the unity of the Godhead."
Go vegan Hindu Jesus Ezekiel Daniel Isaiah worthy Rev 4.7 drackulah Rahab Shiva love you Gen 1.29 gen21.19 Mathew 12.42
There's plenty we disagree on, but this I'm 110% behind you on.
so who are the translators?
Nathan Knorr, George Gangas, Fredrick Franz, and Albert Schroeder.
Can you name one error the NWT has ?
Yes, many.
Ok. Please name one ? Thank you.
For starters, they mistranslate John 1:1. They use the translation of Johanne Greber who was a spiritualist and who got his “translation” of manuscripts from the spirit realm through his wife who was a medium. I’m a born in JW who left at age 25. I was baptized at age 16 and devoted 70 hours a week of my life for one year as a pioneer minister. I was in good standing and realized the teachings are false. I left when i couldn’t deal with the lies anymore.
@bethany,
How is John 1:1 “mistranslated” ? I am surprised with the amount time invested preaching God’s Kingdom, you never looked into this text properly.
@@MC-sd1uy
What reputable scholars say about the New World Translation of John 1:1:
Barclay: Dr. William Barclay, a leading Greek scholar of the University of Glasgow, Scotland: "The deliberate distortion of truth by this sect is seen in their New testament translations. John 1:1 is translated: '...the Word was a god, ' a translation which is grammatically impossible...It is abundantly clear that a sect which can translate the New Testament like that is intellectually dishonest."
Bowman, Robert Bowman, All scholars agree that in John 1:1 "logos" is the subject and "theos" is the predicate. This sets the translation of John 1:1c as, (The Word was God" not "God was the Word". Jehovah's Witnesses, Jesus Christ, and the Gospel of John.)
Boyer: Dr. James L. Boyer of Winona Lake, Indiana: "I have never heard of, or read of any Greek Scholar who would have agreed to the interpretation of this verse insisted upon by the Jehovah's Witnesses...I have never encountered one of them who had any knowledge of the Greek language."
Bruce: Dr. F. F. Bruce of the University of Manchester, England: "Much is made by Arian amateur grammarians of the omission of the definite article with 'God' in the phrase 'And the Word was God.' Such an omission is common with nouns in a predicative construction...'a god' would be totally indefensible." [Barclay and Bruce are generally regarded as Great Britain's leading Greek scholars. Both have New Testament translations in print!]
Colwell: Dr. Ernest C. Colwell of the University of Chicago: "A definite predicate nominative has the article when it follows the verb; it does not have the article when it precedes the verb...this statement cannot be regarded as strange in the prologue of the gospel which reaches its climax in the confession of Thomas. 'My Lord and my God.' - John 20:28"
Feinberg: Dr. Charles L. Feinberg of La Mirada, California: "I can assure you that the rendering which the Jehovah's Witnesses give John 1:1 is not held by any reputable Greek scholar."
Griesbach: Dr. J. J. Griesbach (whose Greek text - not the English part - is used in the Emphatic Diaglott): "So numerous and clear are the arguments and testimonies of Scriptures in favor of the true Deity of Christ, that I can hardly imagine how, upon the admission of the Divine authority of Scripture, and with regard to fair rules of interpretation, this doctrine can by any man be called in doubt. Especially the passage, John 1:1-3, is so clear and so superior to all exception, that by no daring efforts of either commentators or critics can it be snatched out of the hands of the defenders of the truth."
Johnson: Dr. J. Johnson of California State University, Long Beach: "No justification whatsoever for translating THEOS EN HO LOGOS as 'the Word was a god.' There is no syntactical parallel to Acts 28:6 where there is a statement in indirect discourse; John 1:1 is direct....I am neither a Christian nor a Trinitarian."
Kaufman: Dr. Paul L. Kaufman of Portland, Oregon: "The Jehovah's Witnesses people evidence an abysmal ignorance of the basic tenets of Greek grammar in their mistranslation of John 1:1."
Mantey: "I have never read any New Testament so badly translated as The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of The Greek Scriptures.... it is a distortion of the New Testament. The translators used what J.B. Rotherham had translated in 1893, in modern speech, and changed the readings in scores of passages to state what Jehovah's Witnesses believe and teach. That is a distortion not a translation." (Julius Mantey, Depth Exploration in The New Testament (N.Y.: Vantage Pres, 1980), pp.136-137)
Mantey: "Well, as a backdrop, I was disturbed because they (Watchtower) had misquoted me in support of their translation." (These words were excerpted from the tape, "Martin and Julius Mantey on The New World Translation", Mantey is quoted on pages 1158-1159 of the Kingdom interlinear Translation)
Mantey: Dr. Julius Mantey, author of A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament, calls the NWT "a shocking mistranslation." "Obsolete and incorrect." "It is neither scholarly nor reasonable to translate John 1:1 'The Word was a god.'"
Mantey: the translators of the NWT are "diabolical deceivers." (Julius Mantey in discussion with Walter Martin)
Martin: Dr. Walter R. Martin (who does not teach Greek but has studied the language): "The translation...'a god' instead of 'God' is erroneous and unsupported by any good Greek scholarship, ancient or contemporary and is a translation rejected by all recognized scholars of the Greek language may of whom are not even Christians, and cannot fairly be said to be biased in favor of the orthodox contention."
Metzger: Dr. Bruce M. Metzger, professor of New Testament at Princeton University, calls the NWT "a frightful mistranslation," "Erroneous" and "pernicious" "reprehensible" "If the Jehovah's Witnesses take this translation seriously, they are polytheists." (Professor of New Testament Language and Literature)
Mikolaski: Dr. Samuel J. Mikolaski of Zurich, Switzerland: "This anarthrous (used without the article) construction does not mean what the indefinite article 'a' means in English. It is monstrous to translate the phrase 'the Word was a god.'"
Nida: "With regard to John 1:1, there is of course a complication simply because the New World Translation was apparently done by persons who did not take seriously the syntax of the Greek." (Dr. Eugene A. Nida, head of Translations Department, American Bible Society: Responsible for the Good News Bible - The committee worked under him.)
Rowley: British scholar H.H. Rowley stated, "From beginning to end this volume is a shining example of how the Bible should not be translated."
Wescott: Dr. B. F. Wescott (whose Greek text - not the English part - is used in the Kingdom Interlinear Translation): "The predicate (God) stands emphatically first, as in IV.24. It is necessarily without the article...No idea of inferiority of nature is suggested by the form of expression, which simply affirms the true deity of the Word...in the third clause 'the Word' is declared to be 'God' ans so included in the unity of the Godhead."
Do you know any Hebrew or Greek, yourself?
Yes, but irrelevant to the video.
At what university did you read Greek and Hebrew? You make some very bold claims ("they made up their own bible"), which is at odds with even the quite positive evaluation of the NWT by the Catholic Encyclopedia. The content of the NWT is 99.99% the same as every other bible. In the case where there are differences, like John 1:1 or John 8:58, their different readings are perfectky within the scope of what the original Greek text allows. Pretending something different is intellectually dishonest. For these texts other translations can be Found with the same rendering. For "a god" in John 1:1c the earliest translators (into Coptic) give the exact same translation, at least 1600 years ago.
Yeh and there’s absolutely no mistranslations in our Bible 🤦♀️
You should never have to put down anyone else to make yourself feel good or better. This is a nonsense this channel
I knew their Bible was off, but didn't know why.
Do your homework please
Yes, it’s a more easy to understand bible, but we also welcome you to use your bible if you would prefer
There are plenty of watered down, easy to understand translations, (NIV) but what a person should be looking for is a fully accurate translation.
False.
Prove it. We gave facts. Feel free to debunk them. God bless.
...
...
@@CatholicTruthOfficial ....
Lies
Proof?
No response
Negative lol
i think translation means converting one language to another, but muxed there buddy
THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE
From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5
Isa 9:6 the word Prince in the Prince of Peace means PATRON ANGEL also Leader. WHO IS the ONE LEADER that we have? Jesus. Now, that same exact Hebrew word was used for Daniel 12:1 which is used for Michael the Archangel. So are you saying there are MANY LEADERS now?
It's 100% impossible. The Bible says in 1 Corinthians 1:24 that Jesus is the _power_ of God and the _wisdom_ of God. And since there was never a time when God was without his power or his wisdom, for both are eternal, it means that Jesus the Christ is eternal and one in being with the Father. This is what all Christians have believed for 2000 years, and what all of the earliest Christians believed unanimously.
Jesus is God:
Jn. 1:1 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the *Word was God.*
Jn. 5:17-18 - They try to stone Jesus for “Making himself God”
Jn. 8:57-59 - Stoned for taking the Sacred Name of Almighty God, I AM. And not the only time He did this.
Jn. 10:27, 31-33 - Try to stone Jesus for Blasphemy
Jn. 20:28 Greek: Ho Theos = “The Lord of Me and the God of Me”) - Jesus did not reject this or stop Thomas.
Col. 1:15; Col. 2:9 (Jesus hall all the fullness of Divinity in Him).
Heb. 1:8 (Jesus calls the Father God but here the Father calls Jesus God).
Isaiah 9:6 (Jesus is called the Mighty God and “everlasting Father.” In Is. 7 He is called Emmanuel, which means “God with us.”
Worship is for God alone, yet people worship Jesus and he accepts it.
Jn. 20:28
Jn. 9:38
Mt. 28:9
Lk. 24:52
Rev. 5 - Jesus praised and honored on same level as Father and with same praise and honor.
Jn 6:44-46 - God came to teach us in Jesus
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Jesus is the FIGURATIVE WISDOM of GOD and GOD has always his LITERAL wisdom. as 1 Cor 8 shows , the GOD is the Father (excluding others)
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Bryan's interpretation is correct and yours is not.
@@Mr.DC3.1914 John 17, Jesus prayed..
Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world. "Righteous Father, though the world does not know you, I know you, and they know that you have sent me.
Now If we read Isiaih 42:8
I am the Lord; that is My name. And My glory will I not give to another neither My praise to graven images.…
So God will not give his Glory to Another.. Yet Jesus Shared in Gods glory from before creation….
If Jesus isn’t God then the Father Lied in Isiaih 42:8 . Or Jesus Lied in John 17..
which is it because one of these verses is a Lie if Jesus is Not God..
@@deleteduser1892 GOD said Let us MAKE, does the word MAKE there NOT mean create? Make of course has many meanings and you cannot change the fact that create is one of the meanings. Why, have you seen the Bible describe the Father as MADE? Only Jesus was called MADE BOTH as Lord and Christ and as SON. also, Mat 21:42 uses EGENETO same word used in John 1:3 in creation to refer to Jesus - from the Lord was(egeneto-come into being) this (Jesus, the chief Cornerstone). Jesus is called SAR-PATRON ANGEL in Isa 9:6 and if you look at the Hebrew Interlinear, it actually shows in order "Michael the Princes' Chief", the word "Of" is actually an addition for has-sarim, or if you look at it literally,Michael is the CHIEF of the Princes
The bible is just a collection of ancient tall tales set in historical times.
Can you prove that?
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Yes. In the same way as knowing no leprechauns, no tooth fairy, no santa clause, and no bigfoot exists. We disprove it by saying to the person who makes the claim that something exists: "where's your evidence?" and reminding them of the "burden of proof." When they have no evidence other than a fictional story, you don't even need any evidence to dismiss it. "That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."
B.u.l.l.s.h.i t. MAN
N.o.t at a.l.l.