Why Sedevacantism is Wrong! (Sedevacantism isn't Catholic with William Albrecht)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- Why Sedevacantism is Wrong! (Sedevacantism isn't Catholic with William Albrecht). In this video we give at least 5 reasons why sedevacantism is wrong and not Catholic. People should run away from anything sedevacantist.
SUPPORT OUR WORK: Help us catechize the masses, build up and defend Holy Mother Church, and bring non-Catholics home!
Patreon: / catholictruth
PayPal: catholictruth....
GoFundMe: bit.ly/4eq95fj
More Videos Debunking Mad Rad Trads:
1. Debunking VaticanCatholic & the Dimond Brothers: • Catholic Exposes Vatic...
2. Debunking Sedes om the Vatican being Satanic: • Refuting Rad Trads on ...
3. SSPX is in Schism. Catholics Cannot Attend: • SSPX vs Catholic (SSPX...
4. Why SSPX is Wrong: • John Salza Leaves SSPX...
5. Defending Vatican II and the Novus Ordo: • Vatican 2 Catholic Res...
6. Taylor Marshall’s 2 Big Lies against Pope Francis: • Taylor Marshall Slande...
7. Why Archbishop Vigano is a Schismatic: • Archbishop Vigano Exco...
8. Latin Mass and Novus Ordo: • Novus Ordo vs Latin Ma...
FOLLOW CATHOLIC TRUTH:
Instagram: / catholictruthofficial
Facebook Page: / catholictruth.org
Alt. RUclips channel - Catholic Truth Living: (Advice on Love, Dating, Engagement, Marriage and Kids) / @catholictruthliving
Podcast: www.buzzsprout...
Articles Library: thecatholictru...
Twitter: / catholictruth7
TikTok: / thecatholicofficial
Alt Instagram (CatholicTruthLiving) (Love, Relationships, Life) / catholictruthliving
Facebook Group Page: / catholictruthct
Pinterest: / catholictruth
Rumble: rumble.com/use...
MERCH: catholictruth....
APOLOGETICS COACHING:
Would you like 1-on-1 Apologetics training with Bryan? Or would you like a chance to ask questions, get advice, or find direction? Contact Catholic Truth: info@theCatholicTruth.org
Need Apologetics responses crafted for you? info@catholictruth.org
QUESTIONS? Ask us here: www.subscribep...
BOOK: "Counterfeit Spirituality: Exposing the False Gods:"
Our Sunday Visitor: bit.ly/3vtK63Z
Amazon: amzn.to/3e1BqMk
BOOK: "WHY Do You Believe In GOD?" amzn.to/2S1Dadb
**Need an in-person or online retreat? catholictruth.org
Related Searches: sedevacantism is heresy, sedevacantist delusion, sedevacantist pope
Music Credit: http//www.bensound.comroyalty-free-music
We are all being tested. These people are failing. We must be strong. Believe in the Church's authority and Christ's promise. The seat of Peter can not fall. Or our faith is invalid.
You dont understsnd - the seat is still there as it has aleays been. Its the PERSON who occupy that sest is heretic and blasphemer which render him unlegitimate for the office. Simple
The see of Blessed Peter always remains unblemished by any error. (Pastor Aeternus, 6)
Ok so enjoy "pride" masses
That's where you are wrong because you are busy watching the seat of Peter in to line yourself with the church authority, believe in Jesus Christ and not the church authority. By doing that you will know the truth and the truth will set you free. As Catholic you are always busy with catholic as a name and not Christianity to line up with other fellow true Christian brethren. Woke up Catholics. The Pope has disclosed his direction and you are busy smiling and laughing while defending the Pope. Throwing catholic name as a source of pride will be the best decision ever and you won't regret it at all. It's the Christ's seat that is empty and not the he so-called Peter who while acknowledging Jesus as Lord he also ended up turning his back against Christ
Yes if we doubt that the church is indefectable, we doubt Jesus and His power to preserve His Church..
The collaboration I didn’t expect but I love it!
What a catholic team up ❤
Good to see you behind the mike, Bryan. Swift healing! 😁🌹🙏
It will be a while, but thank you.
Wow William brother in Catholic truth love it.
There's something in the current society. Catholics who think the old mass is better, hipsters who think vynil records are better, protestants who think the KJV is better, etc. There is a wide distrust of the modern world.
Sede vacantism has kept my family away from the sacraments for decades.
So sad!
@@CatholicTruthOfficial agreed. My mom is getting near the end of her life and she won't receive last rites, just like my dad didn't.
That's truly tragic.
@@jackieo8693 yeah I agree with you it's really sad because they must not realize or they are totally ignorant what it means to stay away from the mass if you can go to mass on Sunday it is an obligation that don't mean you shouldn't want to go but unless you have a good reason you must be there if not the catechism says it is a mortal sin which means unconfessed and unrepented of will send you to hell . I will pray for them as we all should.
@@kurtmurphy5994 thank you
There are so many similarities between sedevacantism and the protestant revolutionaries. Its all about feelings and personal views. Never made the connection with a cult, but I do see that too. The anger and darkness though, that I have seen since the beginning. God bless you both for providing all of us with this video!
Enjoy your "pride" masses
Yeah a bunch of Protestant Sedevacantists banned me from their channels (Taylor Marshall, The Thomist, Catholic Esquire, etc) for mentioning Vatican 2 and challenging their logic for calling Jesus and God a liar putting forth their own interpretations for his promise in Matthew 16:13-20 that “the gates of Hell shall never prevail against the Church” which is the Catholic Church.
No there is not. It’s based on evidence and papal teaching.
Protestantism seeks to overthrow and undermine Catholic authority altogether. Sedevacantism is a principled boycotting of the demonstrably un-Catholic influence that has hijacked Rome post Vatican 2. It is an observation that there is a substantial break in the tradition of the Church rather than a new religion, we’re essentially the holdouts waiting for the licit authority to obey
Good to see William and Bryan together, two great sons of the Church 🙏
Both have gotten destroyed by Bro. Peter Dimond.
@@deus_vult8111
What are you smoking?
@@deus_vult8111 Why did you make Peter Dimond your own pope by following his personal interpretation of the Word of God (Tradition and Scripture) and church teachings when his interpretation is not protected from grave error or heresy by the Holy Spirit? Only the Pope's interpretation is protected from heresy by the Holy Spirit when he is teaching from the Chair of Peter. Peter Dimond is a
c i t e r e h (reverse the letters), so are you.
Pope Blessed Pius IX wrote in his Encyclical SINGULARI QUIDEM (paragraph 7) in 1856:
"Outside of the Church (physical Church), nobody can hope for life or salvation UNLESS HE IS EXCUSED THROUGH IGNORANCE BEYOND HIS CONTROL."
Pope Blessed Pius IX wrote in his Encyclical QUANTO CONFICIAMUR MOEORE (paragraph 7) in 1863:
"There are of course those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches, and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts and nature of all, His supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishment."
😅 7:00 I was thinking just that. And coming from a protestant background I have seen how volatile these divisions can be.
Thank you Bryan for this video. You always have great content! William is an excellent teacher, debater, speaker, author and apologist for the truth of the Catholic faith! 🙏🙏
Thank you to for watching!
Did not expect William on! Great Guest. People need to check his work also.
I converted to Catholicism through the Latin Mass, I didn’t know they were Sedevacantist at the time. Once I realised I had to go deep into the debates and church fathers and I’d like to share the message I sent to some of the beautiful but misguided people I had made friends with there:
Traditionally as laity we don’t have authority to believe we are above the pope nor can we pass judgement on the pope. That has always been known since the early church fathers, that we are not to be the ones engaged in liturgical debate as we are not trained in such matters.
So under what authority could we claim the pope to be a heretic or that the Catholic Church is no longer holy and 100% infiltrated by Satan (as Rev Sanborn said in his newsletter any miracle in the Novus ordo is the work of the Devil).
Historically the only time theologians said that the cardinals could collectively pass a judgement on the pope was to make a declarative sentence that he was never validly elected.
Once he’s assumed the papacy only the subsequent pope can declare a past pope as a heretic.
However it’s not true that we must obey every one of his statements or teachings. It’s not that he cannot be in error, and in cases where Vatican teachings are put forward that the community of the faithful feel are wrong we should follow the Sensus fidei and thus, the tried and true apostolic teachings. The Holy Ghost would not allow the entire faithful of the church to hold to some point of doctrine when it was heretical. This is the Sensus Fidelium as defined in the Council of Trent.
Fracturing into Sedevacantist groups though, is heretical. We can begin behaving like Protestants. Each different Sedevacantist group is at odds with the other, each believes they are the true church, there is a disbandment from unity. We do not fix the Catholic Church by abandoning it, rather this fracturing weakens the community of the faithful and aids in the Evil Ones plan to fracture the Catholic Church in the same way he did in the different denominations of Christianity. Though in this case he’s taking the most traditional and obedient of the flock away from the Holy Catholic Church at the time we need them most.
Great guest! Love and appreciate William’s work & channel! (Patristic Pillars)
Whoever denies or not in communion with the bishop of Rome is not a Catholic.
Irenaeus
“But since it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul, that church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. With that church, because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world, and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition” (Against Heresies 3:3:2 [A.D. 189]).
Eusebius of Caesarea
“A question of no small importance arose at that time [A.D. 190]. For the parishes of all Asia [Minor], as from an older tradition held that the fourteenth day of the moon, on which the Jews were commanded to sacrifice the lamb, should be observed as the feast of the Savior’s Passover. . . . But it was not the custom of the churches in the rest of the world . . . as they observed the practice which, from apostolic tradition, has prevailed to the present time, of terminating the fast [of Lent] on no other day than on that of the resurrection of the Savior [Sunday]. Synods and assemblies of bishops were held on this account, and all, with one consent, through mutual correspondence drew up an ecclesiastical decree that the mystery of the resurrection of the Lord should be celebrated on no other but the Lord’s day and that we should observe the close of the paschal fast on this day only. . . . Thereupon [Pope] Victor, who presided over the church at Rome, immediately attempted to cut off from the community the parishes of all Asia [Minor], with the churches that agreed with them, as heterodox. And he wrote letters and declared all the brethren there wholly excommunicate. But this did not please all the bishops, and they besought him to consider the things of peace and of neighborly unity and love” (Church History 5:23:1-24:11).
And how can you be a Catholic when you are in communion with a man who rejects the essence of the gospel, i.e. an apostate? Looks like you Catholics are on the horns of a dilemma because of your joke of a religion.
False. Sedes don't deny submission to the pope.
Ok ...then All Religions are true. If you disagree you're not catholic.😊
@@RockerfellerRothchild1776 Do you have any historical evidence to support your erratic and false claim/statement.
Because, I do have some historical evidence and sources to prove that what you are saying is just garbage!!!!
Here's what the Church Fathers have to say in relation to the unity and communion with the Bishop of Rome:
Irenaeus
“But since it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul, that church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. With that church, because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world, and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition” (Against Heresies 3:3:2 [A.D. 189]).
@@RockerfellerRothchild1776 Do you have any historical evidence to support your erratic and false claim/statement.
Because, I do have some historical evidence and sources to prove that what you are saying is just garbage!!!!
Here's what the Church Fathers have to say in relation to the unity and communion with the Bishop of Rome:
Irenaeus
“But since it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul, that church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. With that church, because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world, and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition” (Against Heresies 3:3:2 [A.D. 189]).
Wow, I love the topic of Sedevecant..
When I was former Protestant turning Catholic, I accidentally watch and subscribe, Dimon brothers, which I thought at the moment a Catholic, but when I watch more and more of their videos, it got more confused when they attack the church by saying the sit of Rome is vacant and after the pope Pius 12, the rest of the pope are illegitimate bastard in their own believe ..
To make the story short, I thank God, I never returned back to anti Christ again.. Because Sedevecantist adds confusion, gladly I do more some research, until I discovered and understood that Sede ( before I don't know there is a group such as Sede, a Catholic but attacks the Catholic openly..) is a rebellious Catholic sects.. who are far worse than the Eastern Orthodox church, who doesnt recognize the pope, but also totally see the current pope after pope Pius 12, are the Anti Christ pope...
In the end, for me, Sedevecantist are toxic and evil much worse than the Protestants....
@ Catholic truth , Hey Bryan Mercier, why not set a debate against the Dimon brothers.. to clear things up.. Sedevecantist cause lots of confusion among Catholics..
Amen!
EXCELLENT VIDEO! Great timing and with William Albrecht - one of the best Catholic Apologists.
William Albrecht is the same guy who got destroyed by Brother Peter so badly that he didn’t want another debate,
After he destroyed Peter twice and Peter was begging for more debates so he could redeem himself, the same Peter who refuses to debate him on the Novus Ordo.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Just curious but do you remember any arguments that Albrecht made in the new Mass debate that Brother Peter couldn't refute? If I remember correctly William lied about a supposed quote from St Jerome and he also made some other mistakes.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Peter Dimond made several follow-up videos after he debated with William on the New Mass. He said he was willing to debate William again if he would provide the source for a quote he used during the debate. From what I understand William didn't provide the source so no more debates have happened. Also with as many people as Peter has debated it's laughable to think Peter would turn down another debate with William. I've watched both debates, and you're living in a clown world if you think William destroyed Peter.
@deus_vult8111 "Brother Peter O.S.B."? Do you mean Robert Dimond S.O.B(ad woman)., the guy who plays pretend as a Benedictine monk in upstate New York? You know, the same guy who cut ~20-30 minutes out of his debate with Albrecht? The same guy who demands unreasonable debate conditions and gish-gallops so the debates would be forced to come out in his favor? That Guy?
@@apg8536 Why did you make Peter Dimond your own pope by following his personal interpretation of church teachings when his interpretation is not infallible because it is not protected from heresy by the Holy Spirit? Only the pope's interpretation is protected from heresy by the Holy Spirit when he is teaching from the Chair of Peter. Peter Dimond contradicted Pope Blessed Pius IX who wrote in his Encyclicals that one could be saved outside the physical Church through invincible ignorance and if he faithfully follows natural law. St. Therese also wrote in her autobiography Chapter 1 that there are people who are saved and will be saved outside the physical Church. It's also in the Bible. Read Romans 2:12:16. If Peter Dimond gravely erred in this matter, his interpretations of other church teachings are not free from heresy too and not credible. You are no different from protestants who do their personal interpretations. Personal interpretation is unbiblical and not the teaching of the Church.
The chair of the Pope (and of any other apostle) cannot be unoccupied. There must be a successor sitting there. “Now in the Book of Psalms it says: Reduce his encampment to ruin and leave his tent unoccupied. And again: Let someone else take over his office.” ( Acts of the Apostles 1: 20)
Both of you are doing incredible work….thank you!
Thank you too for watching!
Glad you're back.
I'm not, but thank you. I shouldn't have talked that much. It's going to be a long road.
Wondered when you two would work together 💪🙏✝️
Sedevacantism is really just protestantism
Slander + it goes against VII
@@polodown4729 Bro,you probably attend a Protestant-like mass, your "popes" signed joint declarations with Lutherans, vatican says that Luther is a witness of the gospel and according to Bergoglio Protestants are members of the Church.
@@kimmosimann6776 yeah Sedevacantism sucks
@@polodown4729 yeah, it sucks. Do you think we like being sedes? Lol
Amen! EGO rules.
Thank you for putting this message out there, God bless both of you
When I was in Protestantism, I saw that problem there. That's why I left Protestantism!! Because in Protestantism, if you're a major conspiracy theorist, you don't trust other people. How do you wanna live?
Love both of you gentleman. Thank you for speaking the truth. We faithful must stay strong and unified to the See of Peter, as our faith in Christ’s promise and power is being tested!
Great video Bryan. William is absolutely incredible.
I used to think I was a sedevacantist because I like going to the beach, but then someone told me that's a sandy vacationist, which is something different.
Funny . 😂
This makes me think about that darn Luther calling Pope Leo antichrist.
Luther was so anticatholic: Unless I am convinced by the testimony of the Scriptures or by clear reason (for I do not trust either in the pope or in councils alone, since it is well known that they have often erred and contradicted themselves), I am bound by the Scriptures I have quoted and my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and will not recant anything, since it is neither safe nor right to go against conscience. May God help me. Amen.[4]
I do believe and I may be wrong but I don't think so. Sedevacantist can draw people in just as other Protestants do in that they pray on people who don't know their faith very well I am a Protestant convert from the Church of Christ like most converts I know my faith pretty well I cannot be drawn in by anyone including a Sedevacantist or any Protestant.
Oh I need this, some of educated Catholic even believe in Sedevacantism. Sedevacantist need to read the Bible.
They need HUMILITY.
There is no despair or sadness in sedevacantism. sadness, and despair would be thinking that you have to take what the holy father says and decipher for yourself what is Catholic. In other words? Be your own Pope. Take that back 100 years and see how you'd do. YOU'D BE OUT OF THE CHURCH.
Sede vacante is actually truly a Catholic position. It happens every time a pope dies.
I don't know of too many groups that claim to be THE church. As far as cultish? There are a few, but its not the rule..
Bring on Bishop Sanborn or Bishop Pivurunas. You want to talk sede vacante, give it an honest shake
Also anger? I don't see any anger. Pity might be the better word
I would avoid following one bishop or another, instead follow all the bishops in union with the holy father, this is the Catholic position and always has been.
@MyCatholicReflections
You are correct. That is the Catholic position, but that was before the days of false eccumenism, which has led countless souls to hell. just think if the early martyrs, even the apostles would have known about eccumenism, they would not have had to give their lives. That is why in the Apocalypse, when talking about the whore of Babylon, says she is drunk on the blood of the martyrs and of the saints of Jesus. And again it says come out of her my people.
Antichrist has taken hold of the structures of the church.
Albrecht criticizes sedevacantists because there are disagreements amongst the different groups. But in the Vatican 2 sect there is also a wide spectrum of beliefs e.g. I'm sure many people on this channel disagree with Francis and James Martin for their promotion of LGBT. There are so many "Catholics for Choice" groups but you can find other priests who will try to deny Communion to someone who supports abortion, so where is the unity for you guys?
He also argued that Brother Peter's interpretation of Revelation (called the Apocalypse in Catholic Bibles) is novel, however the Catholic Encyclopedia gives some examples such as Saint Bernard (a Doctor of the Church) saying the antichrist would be an antipope.
This is so obvious it can't possibly be a reason you left the true church.
I dont care if 5,000 people who pretend to be Catholic are prochoice. The Catholic church has already infalliblly taught that abortion are mortal sin.
They have effectively cut themselves off from catholicism. They are not Catholics if they fully know that they contradict Catholic Dogma. Especially once they've been corrected by their brothers, then the elders, the priests, and bishops of their diocese. If they refuse to change, they are eventually excommunicated. There are no prochoice Catholics. There are ignorant people who think they are Catholic. There are wolves in sheep clothing pretending to be sheep.
The answer isn't to leave the church on some bogus claims about the popes. The answer is to stay within the church and make it strong again.
Leaving the church is a classic heretical move.
@@blappappa3836 You misrepresented my position but actually prove sedevacantism is correct. I never said I left the "true church" because a certain number of people in it are pro-choice. I said there are various factions and contradictions within the Vatican 2 sect and gave support for abortion as an example. William and Bryan argued that because there are many sedevacantist groups who have different opinions, it must be false. That's hypocrisy because we know there are Novus Ordo "bishops" who give "Communion" to pro-abortion politicians, etc. Just because there are a few different sedevacantist groups doesn't mean not a single one of them is correct. Would you excuse a pagan who made the same argument about Christianity "Well, the Catholics disagree with the Orthodox who disagree with the Protestants, so Christianity can't be true"? Just because there are disagreements doesn't mean nobody is correct.
When you say someone who contradicts Catholic dogma is cut off from the Church, that's the same argument sedevacantists make to show that the Vatican 2 sect is not the Catholic Church. The antipopes teach heresy. Francis recently said verbatim "All religions are a path that arrives at God" which contradicts the words of Jesus Christ (John 14:6) and the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation. Don't try to explain that away. I speak Italian and that's exactly what he said. Francis believes souls are saved in all religions - a heresy. Pope St Celestine taught in his letter to the people of Constantinople that the moment a cleric teaches heresy, he immediately is excommunicated. Canons 188 §4 and 2314 §1 also teach the same principle that anyone who preaches heresy is excommunicated without any warning, declaration, trial etc. You correctly claim that people who are pro-abortion are not Catholic, even though nobody excommunicated them. But you fail to apply the principle to antipope Francis who has taught many heresies and even honored an abortionist, Lilianne Ploumen, and gave her a medal.
Just because Francis wasn't speaking "ex cathedra" doesn't excuse him from the sin of heresy. Martin Luther wasn't a pope, wasn't promised infallibility, couldn't speak ex cathedra but he was still a heretic because he denied Catholic teaching. Antipope Francis said Luther was correct on justification and not a heretic. So when William and Bryan said there are some sedevacantists who reject the Council of Trent, they don't even acknowledge the man they think is pope who also rejects Trent.
Can you show me where canon law teaches a pope can be a heretic and preach heresy, commit acts of apostasy, change the catechism, etc. but still remain the pope so long as he does not say "I am teaching this heresy ex cathedra"?
@@ALDCC58- Show us in the catechism/teaching where the laity or even bushops have the authority to judge the Pope.
@@atrifle8364 Hello, I already addressed this but can make some more points. Loss of office due to heresy isn't a topic found in a catechism (which usually explains the creeds, 10 commandments, etc.) but is a topic found in canon law because it is deals with governance of the Church and rules for membership. But we can start looking at some encyclical teachings.
Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, #22-23 "Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith… For not every offense, although it may be a grave evil, is such as by its very own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy."
Here he teaches that to be in the Catholic Church you need to profess the true faith; if someone commits heresy or apostasy, he is outside the Church.
Pope Leo XIII, Satis cognitum, #9 "The practice of the Church has always been the same, as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the Fathers, who were wont to hold as outside Catholic communion, and alien to the Church, whoever would recede in the least degree from any point of doctrine proposed by her authoritative Magisterium… 'if any one holds to one single one of these [heresies] he is not a Catholic.'"
This pope says the same that if you depart even slightly from the faith then you are outside the Church. He quotes St Augustine who says someone who holds just one heresy is not a Catholic.
Looking at canon law, it says that all heretics are excommunicated.
Canon 188 §4 "Any office becomes vacant upon the fact and without any declaration by tacit resignation recognized by the law itself if a cleric… Publicly defects from the Catholic faith"
Canon 2314 §1 "All apostates from the Christian faith and each and every heretic or schismatic… Incur by that fact excommunication."
The moment someone preaches heresy he loses his office. Notice is says any office, whether it's a pope, cardinal, archbishop etc. and it says without any declaration. Meaning the person is outside the Church immediately and ceases to be pope, cardinal etc.
Pope Paul IV taught in 'Cum ex apostolatus' that "any Bishop... prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy... the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless..."
He's saying that if someone was a heretic and got elected pope, it would be an invalid election. Even if all the cardinals voted for him he would not be the pope because he doesn't hold the true faith and would be outside the Church because of his heresy.
In the same constitution he writes that "the laity;… shall be permitted at any time to withdraw with impunity from obedience and devotion to those thus promoted or elevated and to avoid them as warlocks, heathens, publicans, and heresiarchs...” So this means the laity can recognize that someone is not a pope because they see him as a heretic and that they need to avoid them, not defend their heresies, stay in their cult and attack anyone who rejects the heretic.
The Church teaches through encyclicals and canon law that a heretic is outside the Church and that there is no trial or declaration needed to determine if someone is a heretic. Pope Paul IV says that even if the cardinals accept someone as pope, if there is proof that the man is a heretic then he is not the pope and even the laity could reject him. Is there evidence that Francis is a heretic? Yes there is when he teaches that "all religions are a path that arrives at God," that Martin Luther was correct on justification and not the Council of Trent, that the death penalty is immoral, that people in adultery can receive Holy Communion, when he takes part in non-Catholic worship, etc.
It doesn't matter that he never taught these heresies "ex cathedra" because he still preaches them and believes them and includes them in his encyclicals which would constitute his "ordinary magisterium." The onus is really on you (and those who hold your position) to show that heretics are members of the Church, can preach heresy and keep their office, that the laity can call public heretics Catholics despite overwhelming evidence.
Final thought, let's say the sedevacantists got it wrong even though we see so much proof of heresy. What does canon law say about us then?
Canonist Father Franz Xavier Wernz, Ius Canonicum, Gregorian University, Rome, 1937, vol. 7, n. 398: “Finally, one cannot consider as schismatics those who refuse to obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person suspect or, because of widespread rumors, doubtfully elected (as happened after the election of Urban VI) or who would resist him as a civil authority and not as pastor of the Church."
Therefore, there is no sin of schism for Catholics who see how bad Francis is and think he's not the pope.
But there is a great sin for you who see all the horrible things he does like how he teaches that sodomites can be 'blessed' as couples, rejects converting non-Catholics, writes the preface to James Martin's book, agrees with Luther on justification, condemns the death penalty, worships with Buddhists, etc. And then defend him, call him Catholic, say he's in the Church, etc.
Isaiah 5:20 “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”
Those things certainly need to be addressed, but they are bugs nor features.
You okay? Welcome back hope the voice is better. BLESSINGS
Thank you. It's not. Not even close. Keep the prayers coming! :)
@@CatholicTruthOfficialHave you asked your priest for a Saint Blaise blessing?
Recently, yes.
Loved this video of two heavyweight apologists
Great dialogue! God bless y'all! 🙏❤
You’re back!!! 🥰. Hope you feel better.
No not back. >_< Not even close sadly. It's going to be a long road to healing. That's why we will have guests where my talking can be minimized.
It would be good to have a SedeVacantist on...unless Catholic Truth can't handle the truth
Sedevacantists tend to turn down debates with people prepared to argue with them.
That's like having a Muslim on. Why would we do that?
@@CatholicTruthOfficial You won't have any sedevacantists on because honestly, you're scared. Everyone saw how Peter Dimond destroyed Jeff Cassman in the debate, & you guys can't risk losing like that again. It's easy to exist in your own echo chamber where you can perform for your fans who will never push back on the points you get wrong.
You are all little cult groupies. You think because he beat cassman that they are infallible lol. They refuse to debate our guest who beat them, not once but twice and they refuse to debate him on the NO. Sorry, we don't talk to crazy. That's always been our policy. It's the same reason we won't debate James White. Although tempting, we don't talk to cults who aren't open to truth and think they are God.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Can you actually deal with a sedevacantist argument w/o referring to strawmen or ad hominems? I understand William is your friend but if you actually listen to the debates & are honest it is clear Peter Dimond won, but at the end of the day winning debates doesn't matter. You guys have little to no understanding about the sedevacantist position so if you are too scared to hear the other side can you please quit acting like you're defeated it?
Love this episode. And its so important right now because it is a 'growing poison'.
There’s one thing that I’ve noticed and that is of what one of the Apostles revealed and spoke about and that is that there will be a great falling away of the faith which means of it’s members obviously as it is pointing at the closer we get to the end of time,now this is more difficult and strenuous than people can perceive or absorb.For not only does the apostle reveal this in his epistles but also in the apocalypse and yet Jesus Christ our Lord and God says it clearer than Daylight when I return shall I find think you any faith on earth this is a helpful video to try and help Catholics understand the signs of the times of which is spoken about in scriptures which is not at all easy to understand thanks for the video I will be very cautious of not excepting anything I listen to or read for I’ve started to realize that there’s so so so much much more to know and understand of what God has taught his Catholic Church from millenniums and centuries back
I'm looking forward to the man with a glowing head. 😂
Wow love both you and William great job guys God Bless
Thanks for listening!
Very timely
Another important warning for Sede’s. Their teachings aren’t all public. One of the priests sent us a newsletter from MHT - Most holy Trinity Donald Sanborn. He stated this very clearly and it was my wake up call. He said, if at any point since at least 1960, ANY miracles occurred in a Novus Ordo mass, that was indeed the work of none other than the Devil himself.
Thank God he said that because it forced me to pray so deeply to God and it became the wake up call I needed to realise a sedevacantism was a wicked wicked ideology.
A liturgy that is substantially Protestant, such as the Novus Ordo, can not in any way produce miracles. That's hardly a controversial belief.
@@TheDTCory Ah, yes, such a sensationalist, unfounded in reality and incoherent rhetoric, thank you for proving his point.
But nice projection.
My position is proven by substantiated claims that form a valid conclusion. Your view has to resort to ad hominem.
Ottaviani Intervention: "[T]he Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent."
@@TheDTCory Said no one, ever. Stop reading sensationalist and schismatic news or whatever you take your info from.
Also you should learn what an Ad hominem is, there was not a single attack on your persona that was not related to what you said. Your failed rhetoric was simply exposed, that's all.
Have a good day. May God grants you discernment.
The DTCory, those are claims without facts
Take a shot every time he says “you have no muh authority” if you want to end it all already
I think Vatican I disproves this but even if it were true, why do you think the pope has “official” and “unofficial” teachings that contradict each other?
What's the problem with lacking authority in the Church? It shouldn't bother you. It means a whole less responsibility come judgment day.
@@atrifle8364 I don’t know what you’re saying
Good to see you brother! How's your voice? Seems better.
Not at all haha. It hurt as lot after using it on this shows. Shouldn't have talked that much. Thanks for checking in. It will be a long road. Probably months, I'm guessing. God bless.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Please, take care of yourself. Health comes first. 🙏
Catholics who don't obey and submit to the Church/Pope or through his Magisterium (official teachings) and non-catholics who became such through their own fault will not attain holiness and will not be saved. Therefore, they will also not convert and save others esp the members of their families. If you want to become a saint and help save the members of your family, obeying and submitting to the reigning pope is necessary.
Maybe you would quote Pope Francis's words "all religions are paths to God/religious diversity is a gift from God" or St. Mother Teresa's statement "If you believe in your heart that your religion is your way to God and your salvation and you have no doubt about it, then, that is your way to God and your salvation." Well, I have an answer and explanation for that. :)
Hi.👋🙂
@@Mr.CUTE777 Hello, beshie! Good morning, brother :). There are many things going on in my mind which I will put in the comment section later. God bless you. 🙂😃
@@marietav7342
Ok.. I see.. 💞🤗
Excited to read your comments, Sis . 📿🙏👍
@@marietav7342
Good morning too sisters in Christ.. 📿📿🙏🙏
You will all fall hard when you will realize we were all right.
Or visa versa. Protestants, Orthodox, Sspx, all say the same as you. Yet, the Catholic Church has stood here for 2000 years. For you, it's a pride thing. For us, its a truth thing based on history.
I think we need to affirm the indefectability of the Church.
Thanks much for this video.
It is precisely bc I studied my way into the Church that I became SVist. After entering the NO I learned about Assisi....scratched my head and thought how could a pope do that? But, bc I was positive the Catholic faith was true, I told myself I had to be wrong. Same when I learned about "Divine Mercy". Sounded like protestantism to me (a former prot)...but once again, told myself, this is the true Church, I must be wrong. Also the state of the Church AND the world, points to the truth of SVism.
You didn't leave Protestantism by being a SVist. It's Protestantism with the sacraments. It's like converting to Eastern Orthodoxy. Protestantism is a mindset where people rely on their own judgement and seek out "purity" in themselves and their congregation. Peter and the apostles are hardly perfect, neither are most OT leaders. God uses them anyway to lead his people.
Divine Mercy is usually something the traditionalists are into. But as the Protestant mindset as not been left behind, I can see why you're rejecting it.
Yes, don't think for yourself, just blindly and uncritically believe what the RCC tells you to believe. (this is sarcasm)
Just blindly accept everything the RCC tell you... this is an argument right out ofnthe Protestant play book. I'm guessing you're a former Protestant because you're talking like one.
Jesus gave us the Church and said we MUST listen to the church or you reject HIM and have no salvation. Thus, yoy bet we are going to listen to the Church Christ established as opposed to mere men like yourself not guided by the Spirit and who have no promise of infalliblility. You and your opinions... or the church. We choose Christ's church. :)
@@atrifle8364 all sedevacantists reject the divine mercy, it was rightly condemned, there are over a hundred heretical or blasphemies passages from it.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial how on earth can you claim your sect has infallibility when you guys bless sodomite couples living in open public "marriages"?
Just as a side note on the SSPX they desire to be in communion with Rome. And even Francis has validated their sacraments. But further than this if we look at catechism 838 it is clear that the church considers anyone calling themselves ‘Christian’ validly baptised are de facto part of the church albeit ‘imperfectly’ so how can anyone be in true schism based on the V2 documents it cites to affirm this catechetical teaching?
They are connected to the Church, not part of the Church. The CCC and Trent, Vatican II, etc says they are outside the Church though having some connection to it
@@CatholicTruthOfficial the catechism 838 says they and this includes all types of Christians that profess to have a valid baptism are certain (and I want to stress the word ‘certain’) but imperfectly part of the Catholic Church they even give the example of the Orthodox Church as being so close and these are schismatics. So please be honest to the text.
CCC 838 “The Church knows that she is joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter.”1 Those “who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church.”2 With the Orthodox Churches, this communion is so profound “that it lacks little to attain the fullness that would permit a common celebration of the Lord’s Eucharist.”3
Then why does it say in CCC838 under the section of ‘who belongs to the Catholic Church’ that in that it says it is certain that those who have a valid baptism are joined to the Church.
And then emphasise the Eastern Orthodox who are in schism as being so close to fullness.
The answer is they absorb all Christians de facto and then graduate their closeness by fullness of truth in them. Despite their whole religious belief being anti Catholic and Catholic truth?
@@CatholicTruthOfficialyour C 838 literally says all baptized have certain communion and are joined with the Catholic church.
A schismatic would be one who leaves the Catholic Church, what Lefebre did was a schismatic act even though he was validly baptized.
Where is the Church in terms of rapture, removal of bride before Tribulation?
It is clear the seven years of Jacobs trouble is upon thevworld.Israel and middle East is a mess.
No such thing as the Rapture. That's a man made doctrine.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial I'm reading the Bible, there are numerous passages on this. The early church fathers, eusebius works were reviewed, by today's scholar, and is there. It's looking like the rapture mimics the resurrection / glory of Jesus. Consider that in book of Mathew, the Graves opened and 40 days the people were seen.
It's a catalyst for the sudden numbers of conversions in early Christian. Even the disciples were clueless that Jesus would resurrect.
From that time, the church became underground, HUNTED down.
The future church is United in the persecution thru the name of Jesus.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial I'm not Catholic but you're absolutely correct. That's a made up thing.
The doctrine of the rapture is not Catholic and was invented only about 200 years ago with Darby. I would recommend avoiding any content that promotes it.
@@MyCatholicReflections Early church father, Eusebius had it.
The recent Catholic Bible NRSVUE, restored the missing Esdras passages, that by middle centuries was deliberately removed.
It was disheartening to read a recently poorly written article by Catholic News Agency that claims the SSPX is not in schism. They cited Jimmy Akin as a source, never thought I'd find myself disagreeing with Jimmy Akin on anything Catholic.
At the very least, and being generous, they are in material schism.
Hi, is it possible to make to make a clear explanation of the comparison between the old and new rite of consecration of bishops? It's quite concerning. May need a canonist on this one ....
Check out the articles on the True Or False Pope website on this topic
Where did the term novus ordo come from because I believe that is a term mentioned by Pope Paul VI once but latched onto by the Sedes?
It's unfortunately the official name for the current missal on many Church documents. It's a perfectly solid name, but it's obviously been weaponized. The official name of "TLM" is the Extraordinary Form or the Missal of 1962. That official name is helpful, because how is "the Mass of the Ages" simply the modified Missal of 1962?? Hmm...🤔🙂
It just means the New Order of the Mass.
Excellent video Bryan!
I assume that this one was prerecorded before voice therapy.
No, it wasn't. We will be having more interviews so I can do minimum talking (though I spoke a bit too much in this video). Won't so much in the future. Hopefully. >_
I must say that the pope is not the Son of God or immaculate and all of the hierarchy and priesthood and members in the Catholic Church,there’ll be problems of problems in the Catholic Church that even Jesus Christ himself revealed but it doesn’t mean that those who truly love and live for Jesus and his one true church will give up on it
Overturn the 1962 and 1963 Supreme Court decisions
Bryan I'm waiting for you to debate Kelly Powers.
Is this a joke? 😂
Bryan won't be debating anyone for a long time because of his voice. At least speaking debates. Maybe a written debate.
Why would any Catholic deal with that guy, He is only wanting clicks from Catholics on YT because absent that He has no content anyone wants to listen to. I tell Catholics whenever He does a Catholic topic, don't bother with His channel and give Him clicks. Let His channel flop.
No one should give extremists the time of day. That goes for Catholics and Protestants.
Thank you for this video. We have too many sedevacantists going around lying about Francis in heresy over his recent comments in Singapore and making themselves the ultimate authority over the Magisterium and Vatican 2 with Francis’s very poor job of communicating Nostra Aetate paragraphs 1-4
Sedevacantism = at this point deny the papcy all together
False. Sedes believe in the papacy. Those who accept Bergoglio are bound to deny Vatican I.
Read pastor aeternus 6.
I'm on Team Francis - the eternal, ever winning team. "No time for losers 💩cause we are the champions...of the world". 💃🕺
Why won't you debate the Dimonds? You seem to have a great command on your theology. They are asking for a debate????????
@@BethCordova-sv7ou Why did you make Peter Dimond your own pope by following his personal interpretation of church teachings when his interpretation is not infallible because it is not protected from heresy by the Holy Spirit? Only the pope's interpretation is protected from heresy by the Holy Spirit when he is teaching from the Chair of Peter. Peter Dimond contradicted Pope Blessed Pius IX who wrote in his Encyclicals that one could be saved outside the physical Church through invincible ignorance and if he faithfully follows natural law. St. Therese also wrote in her autobiography Chapter 1 that there are people who are saved and will be saved outside the physical Church. It's also in the Bible. Read Romans 2:12:16. If Peter Dimond gravely erred in this matter, his interpretations of other church teachings are not free from heresy too and not credible. You are no different from protestants who do their personal interpretations. Personal interpretation is unbiblical and not the teaching of the Church.
@@BethCordova-sv7ou Show this to your "Pope" Peter Dimond
Pope Blessed Pius IX wrote in his Encyclical QUANTO CONFICIAMUR MOEORE (paragraph 7) in 1863:
"There are of course those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches, and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts and nature of all, His supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishment."
@@BethCordova-sv7ou And this:
Pope Blessed Pius IX wrote in his Encyclical SINGULARI QUIDEM (paragraph 7) in 1856:
"Outside of the Church (physical Church), nobody can hope for life or salvation UNLESS HE IS EXCUSED THROUGH IGNORANCE BEYOND HIS CONTROL."
The comments to this post are fair. It would be better to be in union with all the bishops who are in union with the see of Peter than to follow one man's personal interpretation of Church teaching in the past, especially when it diverges from the present, living magisterium.
What is it? I never heard Sedevacantis?
The accusation that the seat of Peter is vacant. Revelation 12:10 reveals the spirit behind accusation.
The believe there has not been a real pope in many decades and the ones that we have had are fraudulent heretics.
The Dimond Brothers did a good job exposing the charismatic movement!!
Maybe, but we would be careful watching them. They are also a poison and full of many errors.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial , well, in that case, Brian, do you guys think you could make a video debunking the charismatic movement? It would be good if you guys could!!
@@OrthodoxChristianBeliever the Vatican endorses the heretical Catholic charismatic movement, just another sign that the v2 counterchurch is a satanic counterfeit mockery
@@OrthodoxChristianBeliever I agree. The doctrine of tongues that he often purported there is not really Catholic.
@@MyCatholicReflections , the way we View Tongues, In The Orthodox Church Is They Are Real Languages Which Can Be Interpreted, First Corinthians Chapter Fourteen. Our charismatic, "friends" never follow that rule!! When I Was At Eastern Orthodox Easter, we Had Bible Readings From Six, Different Languages. There May Have Been Six Languages Spoken, But The Pattern Of Which The Readers Followed Was Identical To First Corinthians Chapter Fourteen!!
St. Catherine of Sienna was a laywoman and called out the false Pope of her day.
She also on her own authority wrote a letter to the Cardinals urging them to accept the true pope, but @CatholicTruthOfficial or @WilliamAlbrecht won't tell the listeners that...
The pope was not false in her day, but she did call him out, as did other bishops.
@@CatholicTruthOfficialdo you not know Catholic history? I thought you were an apologist who could smash sedevacantism? St Catherine of Siena (a lay person) was alive during the GWS when there were at one time three claimants to the papacy. She recognized the real one and wrote a letter to the cardinals urging them to quit supporting the anti pope and follow the true pope. So where did she as a layperson get the authority to recognize and act on an anti pope?
@@apg8536- Having 3 Pope around is not the same as claiming no Pope exists. It's the opposite problem. Also, writing a letter is hardly the level of action most modern sedes take.
@@atrifle8364 You're missing my point. As a layperson, St. Catherine was able to recognize an Anti-Pope & sound the alarm to the faithful. A common argument against sedes is "bY wHaT aUtHoRiTy dO yOu HaVe To SaY tHaT?" Catholic history & Catholic teaching are clear that even the laity can recognize heretics (wolves in sheep's clothing) and alert others to this. The entire argument used by Novus Ordos is wrong & misses the point, but I'm not surprised because most of you guys don't even understand the sedevacantist position.
Sir Bryan Mercier, why not set up a debate against the Dimon brothers. To clear things up..
Thanks for the comment. There's nothing to clear up. Sedes can't even agree with each other. Like Protestants. Maybe the different groups should debate each other first to see who's correct. Then we could move from there. :)
@@CatholicTruthOfficial
I see, ok.. thanks..
But I'm still hoping that someday, you'll be actually debating the Dimon brothers..
Just you know, I'm not giving up on that one just yet..
It would be a debate of the century , if that happens in the near future..
God bless you Sir Bryan Mercier and the rest of the Catholic Church..
📿🙏✝️❤️💚💙
Ever play tetherball? Imagine cutting the tether when the ball is at max velocity. All dissdents, sedes, etc, are the loose ball.
Why are you afraid of the dimonds? That will be the best time for you to correct them. If you think they are in error. Do not be chicken if you really think your argument is correct.@@CatholicTruthOfficial
@@russelbangot3036- Nobody is afraid of the Diamonds. The issue is that a)they will probably turn down debate offers anyway, as sedes become very fragile with time and b) it's probably a waste of time as even the soundest case for the Church will still be interpreted by their followers as being the losing one.
Are you aware of what Pope Francis said? Haven't you seen the news? Gotta wait for the next Pope cause this one goes against the Bible.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father except through me"
Honestly it makes me sad. As a fellow South American. I used to think he was cool. Hopefully the next one doesn't contradict the Bible. And he went against Catgolic tradition too. Honestly you can't blame sedevacantists.
Maybe ignore the news and gain a full understanding of everything that Francis has said and written on the subjects of interreligious dialogue and evangelization.
The differences between the sede groups points to the truth there is no valid pope to settle the matter.
Also, the VII fake Catholic Church says there is salvation outside the Church, so even if we're wrong, we win. We're Catholic and there is no denying that.
As to "old Catholics" and the Dimond brothers, they are truly lost. The Dimonds deny baptism of desire and blood.
Literally Vatican II documents repeat the catechism. Please read it for yourself at some point. What makes a Catholic a Catholic is accepting and submission to the chair of Peter. We can all be Christians, but only those that submit to Rome are Catholic.
@@atrifle8364 They literally introduce condemned religious ideas such as false religious liberty and false ecumenism. You can't be in schism if you refuse submission to a questionable person claiming to be a pope. It's most obvious to honest people that Francis isn't a Catholic, much less the pope.
@@atrifle8364Vatican 2 says the Catholic church is not identical to the church of Christ. Word for word the opposite from mystici corporis.
There certainly is no salvation without the Church, so if any one is saved it will be in virtue of the truths and graces emanating from the Church. God is not confined to his sacraments, and his grace certainly reaches out and draws people, it can be implicit and non-normative but God can do in the hearts of others who are sincere and honestly following what God gives to them.
sedevacantis is like cancer
And "pride" masses aren't?
Does the sedevecantism religion lead to God? Pope francis says "Yes"...arnt they part of the mystical body of Christ?
@@RockerfellerRothchild1776 what do you mean pride masses ???
Have you guys any thoughts on the new sins the pope is introducing during the October synod? I’m scared of what he’s about to do!
These worries are about a lack of faith. It's not entirely your fault, as many channels run on fear. Pope Francis is not changing any doctrine, no matter how many left leaning Catholics might wish it or how many right leaning channels need to generate clicks.
If it's all too much, become a pious medieval Catholic. They might have known the name of their Pope and prayed for him. What he said and did was not even news and nobody cared. Pay attention to your priest and bishop if it's all too confusing.
These worries are about a lack of faith. It's not entirely your fault, as many channels run on fear. Pope Francis is not changing any doctrine, no matter how many left leaning Catholics might wish it or how many right leaning channels need to generate clicks.
If it's all too much, become a pious medieval Catholic. They might have known the name of their Pope and prayed for him. What he said and did was not even news and nobody cared. Pay attention to your priest and bishop if it's all too confusing.
The best way to stop being scared: shut off the social media feeds.
Such as ….. ?
Catholic News Service reported the following:
• “The second session of the Synod of Bishops on synodality, set to bring 368 bishops, priests, religious and laypeople to the Vatican, will begin by asking forgiveness for various sins on behalf of all the baptized.” [1]
• “According to the Vatican, the sins confessed will include: sins against peace; sins against creation, sins against Indigenous populations and migrants; the sin of abuse; sins against women, family and youth; the sin of using doctrine as stones to be hurled, sins against poverty; and sins against synodality or the lack of listening and communion.” [1]
Once again, the Roman Catholic Church, through its leadership, is rejecting the 10 Commandments and is redefining what sin is. This is a distortion of God’s standard of truth and morality. Destroying the ecosystem is now a “sin” against God.
Sedevacanists may be wrong but Pope Francis hasnt done us any favors with his recent statements. They are indefensable.
Cut down on the social media. Trust that the Holy Father knows what he's doing and just don't pay attention when the media spins him yet again.
@atrifle8364 I have a brain and I can't ignore what he said which is directly opposite to what Jesus said. And it was social media that got me back into the Catholic Church, so I won't be cutting it out anytime soon.
@@MrJoebrooklyn1969- We don't really have idea what his complete thoughts are. His thoughts/words are literally translated, broken up into pieces, and the media adds their "helpful" context. It is less work to simply shut off the media than to try to analyze every quote out of context that goes viral. So, yes it's possible to completely ignore Pope Francis and it's the work of letting go of a time wasting habit. Also, it's wonderful that social media brought you back the Church, but continuing it should be entirely unnecessary if it's causing confusion currently.
@atrifle8364 I'm an Italian American and I understand Italian, I've listened to the whole thing in Italian, nothing was taken out of context and a couple of days later he doubled down on what he said by saying that is was God's active will to have different religions. I'm constantly attacked by Protestants and weak Catholics about this Pope, especially my old Evangelical Church. I have to defend the Catholic Church correctly which is something that was not done for me and why I left at the age of 15. Catholics have to stop being wimps and learn the Bible and their faith and when a Pope is wrong, especially this one who has been sus, we need to own up to it. He may be an anti-Pope.
@@MrJoebrooklyn1969 Really?! Pope Francis said it was God's ACTIVE will to have different religions?! Are you sure about it that he used the word ACTIVE instead of PERMISSIVE (will)?!
It's hard to take this video seriously when you have so many distortions and misunderstandings about sedevacantism, but you two act like experts about it.
Except we don't. You guys can't even agree with each other. Get it figured out among yourselves first then we can talk
@@CatholicTruthOfficial What you fail to point out is beyond the Dimond brothers, who hold to the Feeneyite heresy, our lack of unity is on the nature of this crisis & how we resolve it. For the rest of Catholic teaching, we agree. Look at the Novus Ordo. You guys have zero unity of faith. You have the crazy German bishops who embrace & promote heterodoxy. Even Hans Kung who denied papal infallibility was still never excommunicated, and don't even get me started with all the US Catholic politicians who openly promote the sodomite/anti-life agenda. The Novus Ordo is no different than the Anglicans with high-church & low-church sects.
@@CatholicTruthOfficialwhat do sedevacantist clergy disagree on?
90% of clergy agree on everything except how we have no pope (totalism vs sedeprivationism) and use of the 1955 holy week rites (which Cardinal Roncalli didn't even use as a Bishop).
The other 10% disagree on a sacramental intention issue, and they don't even call themselves sede and aren't really a part of much of anything.
On all dogmatic,moral, and mystical theology there is a 99.5% unity among the clergy (one feeneyite out of 200 sede priests). The Novus ordo is the one in communion with feeneyites (st Ben center in Mass)
@@apg8536 Show this to your "Pope" Peter Dimond
Pope Blessed Pius IX wrote in his Encyclical QUANTO CONFICIAMUR MOEORE (paragraph 7) in 1863:
"There are of course those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches, and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts and nature of all, His supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishment."
Sedevacantism is not a monolith so not all statements will apply to every group. The main point is that they are not faithful to the living magisterium in our time.
Peter Diamond and William Albrecht had a debate a while back, And IMO William didn't do to well. Maybe we can have another debate about the Issue. Also, Peter Diamond had a debate with Jeff Cassman where Jeff Cassman couldn't even answer whether Pope Francis practice's the One True Faith. I'm not a Sede, but this pontificate is extremely concerning.
The last debate we had was on the Novus Ordo and it was so bad for Peter Dimond he made a condition on debating me again in the future-with demands that he could edit out portions of the debate to his liking. If I didn't "DO TOO WELL" he would not have made those qualifications and would not have avoided debating me on Vatican II for over 15 years now. I know the arguments very well and each and every time he used to call into R&T he would get thoroughly refuted.
As I understand it that was the third debate. The first two Peter didn't do well and so he kept asking to have another one.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Are you talking about the debate held found on Diamonds channel? I watched a debate that's split up into 23 parts. William didn't do to great. I watched it a couple of times.
@@loganmisiak5573- Maybe go watch the unedited version elsewhere.
@@atrifle8364 it's not edited, just split up into parts.
What utter nonsense! No, we don’t claim to depose any pope. No, we don’t believe popes are just “losing their offices”, and no, we are not so much concerned about the personal heresies of these Vatican II “popes.” If you’re going to try and debunk our position, at least get our position right.
We did. The problem is that you guys can't agree with each other. Get it figured out among yourselves and then we can chat.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial none of us claim to have the authority to depose a pope. That is a lie. If a random layman online tweets as such, then he is mistaken and wrong. We don’t have the juridical authority to do such a thing. Furthermore, most of the disagreements among sedevacantists center around the fact that there is no pope to settle such disputes. Are you seriously going to pretend that Novus Ordo land is one big happy family? From James Martin to EWTN to the SSPX and the million other groups along the spectrum, please spare us.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial any reason my reply was deleted?
@@Matthew_JosephRUclips does most of the deleting, I can tell because some comments slip by the algorithm, but AFAIK Bryan said in one of his videos that he allows comments no matter what
@@Ticket7G I see, thank you
Wjo is this William Albrecht???
Watch the video and see. :)
One of the best Catholic Apologists, debaters and authors of our time.
@@Theosis_and_prayer really??? Im over 40 cradle catholic and never ever heard of him. Ever.
@@helenakurcewiczowna6695 Maybe it is the circles you run in. He has published some excellent books. His co-authored work with Fr. Kappes, a Byzantine Catholic Priest, on the Canon of the Bible is excellent.
@@helenakurcewiczowna6695where have you been?
And you believe that Jorge Bergolio alias "Pope" Francis is Catholic than sedevacantist for teaching that "All religions are path to God denying the dogma of the Church " No Salvation outside the Catholic Church"😂
If a quote can fit in a meme, it's not the complete thoughts of the Holy Father. It's apparently a CS Lewis type moment, which several past popes have also done at various times.
Pope Francis was speaking with a particular audience of secular children. And it is true to the extent that other religions contain the truth that they are path to God. We have many Protestant converts. The truth they learned other places led them to the fullness of the faith and God.
On the flip side, the Church has never taught that laity can judge the Pope. Be careful with "no salvation outside the Church". It applies much more to sedes than those in situations beyond their immediate control.
God does indeed use other means to draw men to himself. The Logos reaches down from heaven and utilizes those rays of truth. No one is saved without the Catholic Church, so if one is saved it is in virtue of Christ and his Church even if implicitly.
An embarrassingly shallow and ridiculous presentation.
It's a summary presentation. My personal experience is that it's correct.
Artrifle, it's okay. What he meant to say is that he didn't even watch the video. That's why he couldn't give anything about it. These sedes just like to yell and scream but don't have any facts
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Jeremiah Alphonsus has a channel always saying against the Catholic Church which he believes is a false church and against Pope Francis which he believes is a false pope.
@@JeremiahAlphonsus Hello, bestie (or beshie in gay lingo)! Thanks for banning me from your channel! :)
@@CatholicTruthOfficial Jeremiah Alphonsus has a channel always saying against the Catholic Church and Pope Francis which he believes is a
Suggested alternate channel name "Catholic Cope"
That applies to the sede channels, not this one
Except there are sede group that do things to soread the beauty of the faith. Cmri( congegation of mary immaculate) do. I grew up and went to highschool with them and learned my fsith really well, church history, baltimore catechsim, read lives of saints for book reports, even learned about denominations and heresies and how they started evn ones that no longer exist today.along with true devotion to Mary which is the center banner of the group. They have a yearly annual fatima conference in spokane which typically gets hundreds of goers. I remember praying the 15 decade rosary around the big old jesuit building with so many people. The most ive prayed a rosary with let alone a 15 decade. It was dark and so all nuns , people at the conference prayed tye rosary with father casimir leading with a mike so as to be heard.. everyone had lit candles and in between each decade was song a verse of the hymn to Our lady of fatim," Oh Fatima cove I the thirteenth of May" song. Going to school with them i learned so many marian hymns which I still remember by heart today at least for one chorus.. Also they not all doom and gloom if you look up their videos posted. Some of priest i knew there and individuals students were some of the biggest joksters ive ever met.
It's good to spread the faith, and we are glad you learned a lot. However, they also spread poison and heresy. Even a little poison in a brownie can kill.
We've looked on their websites. They are doom and gloom, friend. They have little that is positive, loving, kind, or wholesome.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial then maybe you should look further on their website as they have index of articles on lots of different aspects of the faith not just the current situation. Also maybe you should check out their adsum letters or the guardian. The guardian contains articles by the minor seminarains ( highschoolers) which are sent out to their families and anyone who request it as well. Then sent out hundreds of those a month. I know because at school the students once a month would take off some classes in order to fold and envelope the guardian to be mailed out.
@@CatholicTruthOfficial then maybe you should check out their website again because they have indexof articles for many aspects of the faith not just the current situation. Many priest I knew perso ally and so far the most inspiring speeches I've heard about the mother of God came with them. Only Father ripperger and Gabe after hours can rival
@@CatholicTruthOfficial- Yes, unfortunately the hard core sedes lack all 3: faith, hope, and charity.
Do you know about the Litgury of the Hours?? If you pray the hinge offices, you pray as Mary prayed every night. The Rosary is wonderful, but it seems like it can turn into a competition of repetition.
What difference does it make whether catholic or not according to the Pope's message to the world?????????? Does catholic preach the gospel???????????
It's someone's lay interpretation of the popes message to the world.
That's the problem with your statement.
You do not know what he really said. You do not know what he meant. Read some analysis.
Yes, the Catholic Church preaches the gospel and teaches that Catholicism is the fullness of the faith.
One must put some thought into this. All religions have at least "some" truth in them. Look at their beliefs. They might be mostly false, but there is a kernel of truth there. That fraction of truth appeals to us and we naturally desire more. When we desire more, we seek more.
Look at converts to Catholicism: they come from every religion on earth and no religion at all. Yet, there had been "some" truth in their lives. That bit of truth and their desire for more lead them to the fullness of Jesus Christ - which is not in Protestantism and cannot be.
Nice to see you’ve recovered from your major voice issues that conveniently arose after the Popes heretical statements in Singapore. A shame I really wanted to hear your thoughts on the Pope denying Jesus Christ being the truth the way and the life. No one comes to the father except through him. The Pope not infallible. Think we need to pray for the Pope that his liberalism doesn’t continue to pull him away from Christs teachings.
I haven't. Not even close. Shouldn't be talking that much. >_< That's why we will be having more guests on for the near future.
Before damning the pope to hell, spend some time in prayer and listen to some analysis. RASH JUDGMENT will net you a severe judgment.
But 2022 Sede is plausible. 1958 is insane and wicked.
They all are. ;)
God bless you brother. They are both severely defective. Honestly, if the sede narrative is true, it would mean Catholicism as a whole is wrong and broken bc Jesus never kept His promise to preserve His visible Church.
Both options are heresy
@@OzCrusader Nope. It’s very possible Bergoglio was never the pope. He is certainly a heretic and is working to destroy the Church.
@@Theosis_and_prayer Nope. Bergoglio is most probably an antipope.