I prefer the a6400 because of its incredible autofocus and unlimited recording. But the xt30 seems to be a smarter choice because of better lens selection. Thumbs up for detailed comparison 👍
In Australia, I could get the XT30 and f2.8 ,18-55mm lens at least $200 cheaper than a6400 with f 3.6- kit lens Sony compatible lenses are significantly more expensive, and often larger, than Fuji options. Loved the feel of the Nikon Z50, but lack of affordable lenses at f2.8 killed that one for me, too ☹️
I had a Fujifilm X-T1 for many years, the still pictures it takes are amazing, but after I start shooting family pictures I quickly saw the need for autofocus. I think this is one of the most important feature from a camera today. Almost every camera today are great, and takes amazing pictures, can you pick wrong if you look just on spec's? The ease of use, the customisations and autofocus are the reason I got the Sony A6400... great comparison mate :-) Thank you
Thanks Maarten. Great video as always. I'm really looking forward to Part 1 when you dive into still image quality differences. I hope you talk about differences between the two cameras with SOOC jpegs. Thanks again for your thoroughness and excellent, detailed explanations!
Do anyone concern that the super noise with A6400 as usual at 12:17？ And I was shocked by the image detail from the comparison video of part one at 16:19. Why Fuji was totally lost ？
Always glad to hear that my examples are useful for you to make your decisions, but remember it's a pretty extreme scene and not really representative of how you might light a low light scene.
Thanks, I do appreciate your kind words. Clear Image zoom (Sony) is a nearly noticeable loss in quality (thanks to the lower resolution of video than the image area of the sensor).
Excellent videos, thanks! I ended up going with the A6400 but it was two days of agonizing. In the end, I needed a camera that could take great video, shoot really well and act as my web cam due to the coronavirus outbreak. Despite my like for the X-T30's slightly better still pictures, the video with the Sigma 16mm 1.4 really sold it for me. Either way, both cameras are really excellent. I don't think there's a bad choice here. Just a difference in what you need more/less.
are there any new options in 2021? the X-E4 seems like a rangefinder equivalent with identical settings to the T-30 but the S-10 seems to be an improvement over the T-30, but all I see in the description is OIS, which at 200$ more (amazon lists the t-30 at 799 right now) I don't see as compelling enough especially since it doesn't have the discounted lenses when bought as a kit.
Difficult decision, but i ended up with the a6400. Did you observe when using the my dial settings and a custom button to cycle between 1->2->3 only works when using the rear LCD? When using the EVF I cannot cycle. I was using position 2 to control ISO.
@@MaartenHeilbron I just tested it out. Toggle and cycle My dial won't operate when using EVF. Prior to using EVF, if you switch to my dial 1,2 or 3, you will have that functionality while looking through the EVF, but you won't be able to hit the custom button to switch to the next my dial. If you use my dial (1, 2 or 3) on hold button, then it will work with the EVF while you are holding that button and honor that my dial's settings. It will return to the default operation upon release. Not the most intuitive.
I think that the xt30 has some kind of tracking object function in video right? the wide/tracking. When do you record FHD 24fps do you see overheating alarm also in the xt30?
Well, not really - certainly not like the A6400. Both are much less likely to overheat in HD mode, but it depends on the temperature where you’re recording.
Hallo Maarten, thanks for your vidéo. As a Fuji lover I have a question, is it possible to charge the X-t30 with usb when the HDMI is use with the Atomos Ninja V please ? You know where i'm going to... The idea is bypass the 10min limitation recording thanks to the Atomos and to know if the combination of charging and using HDMi is fine (... and if I can buy X-t30 in place of X-t3, it's better for my wallet) Thanks for your answer. GillesR
There is no preset that matches it. However, it is likely possible to re-create the results in post, if you're starting with the neutral creative style. Although I haven't tried it, I'm confident that the picture profile settings do provide the controls to fully replicate Eterna, or any camera's on the A6400. If you really want Eterna, probably best to buy a Fujifilm camera.
"Give the people what they want." I remember subscribers asking for this comparison and you've delivered, "delivered in spades." Fantasist, thorough job as usual.
I choose the XT 30 because of the lightweight wide angle lens selection. I am using this on a gimbal and trying to keep the entire set up as light as possible for wedding work, currently paired it with the new 16 f/2.8. I even tried to make the RX100 VA work but the overheating issues were horrible, couldn't even make it past 3 mins at times on a 60 degree day. The 6400 does not offer much in a 2.8 range wide angle that is not heavy besides the 16mm pancake (which is terrible) and maybe the Zeiss Touit 12 which is not the best focusing lens. Anyway... great video my friend.
What settings do you suggest if I pass the Xt30 to a stranger on the street to help us take family pictures? Touch to focus & shoot or use face select and make sure it is prioritising the face I have selected?
@@MaartenHeilbron thanks for the reply. Switching it to auto does mean the camera is shooting JPEG right. Also shooting auto doesn't necessarily mean the subjects would be 100% in focus. I'm worried that there would be other poeple in the frame and the camera would focus on them instead. Appreciate your input thanks
That's correct, no RAW in auto. However, I find this the best compromise when asking non-photographers to take photos. The fault is not usually the focus, it's the composition.
Unless the scene is dark, or changing too quickly to focus properly, it's not likely. The D90 is a good camera with a good sensor - the rest depends on the lenses and on you, particularly the settings you use.
@@MaartenHeilbron hi...thanks for your answer...i have 3 lenses: nikkor 50mm 1.8g, nikkor 70-200mm and nikkor 18-105mm...i still feel missing sharpen on picture even if some are nice... And the d90 is a second hand...so i guess i'll have to check the number total of pictures taken cause it's not unlimited...
@@romualdb5968 Maybe you just need to take some time to perfect the right settings and method you're using for focus. That gear should provide sharp photos.
Wow, I just had to comment on how awesome your reviews and comparison videos are. When you say "super detailed" you sure mean it! (and there's still a part one coming, wow!) Thank you for these great in-depth videos! Looking forward to (hopefully) a future "best video settings for the Fuji X-T30" Oh, and these are both such amazing cameras. It was a really tough choice to make but I chose the X-T30 because once I held it in my hands at the store, I just knew it was the one. The A6400 has some really great features (like the autofocus) but I love having my camera with me all the time and the X-T30 just makes me happy to have it out with me and is good enough for what I need it for. The A6400 is a camera I would take out to a shoot when I need it, but the X-T30 is the camera I want to carry around all the time.
Great comparison! Considering 2 camera body also need to consider choice of lens and battery grip, battery life. It's good to add these general information in the summary section. Cheers!
Excellent and detailed comparison, thanks! I'm looking at the X-T30 because I like it's physical style, quality of the images, and the variety of affordable lenses including the 18-55mm F2.8-4 which is what I like to use as an every day shooter. I don't think Sony has any good options for a fast standard zoom.
Thanks for the review! Very well done! I am wondering your thoughts on the similar priced Sony a7ii vs the Sony a6400 to go full frame instead? Thanks!
Maarten, excellent review as usual! I am new to Sony and have a A6500, Excellent overview of the A6400 menus, made it seem clearer to me than before. Soooo many options today!
Hello Maarten. Thanks for the detailed review! I am trying to seriously consider the xt30 for video.( I am convinced on the stills side). I Wonder If adding an external recorder would prevent the heating risk. Did you try shooting thr xt30 as long as possible with the external recorder? I would love to know that. Thanks a lot
I'm sorry, I did not test that. In my experience with other models where i have tried that, it's not usually a solution, or a best provides a few more minutes.
Mr Marteeen Kindly advise me i want camera for video shoot and photography kindly advise me which one is best sony a6600 or fujifilm xt30 i m wating from your reply after that i will order
They're both great cameras. I'm kind of partial to the Fujifilm interface (physical and menu) so that would be my choice - but I would suggest that you let your wallet, your hand and your design/style preference make your decision.
Good one! Seem like T30 is better for videos while it'll require an external recorder to utilize high-end functions. Would you like to suggest a few 4K external recorders for T30?
Thanks! Always nice to see your avatar. Any recorder from Atomos that supports 4K/30 is suitable. They come in various sizes, you don't need (for the X-T30 anyway) one that supports a higher frame rate.
@@MaartenHeilbron 🙏🙏🙏 1. I find Atomos Ninja Flame suitable. What do you say? 2. Would you like to make some lens recommendations especially for videos? 3. And if I choose not to go with Fujinon lenses, which brand may work for me?
Always happy to help. 1) It is suitable. 2) The MKX series, but I use the 16-55 and it provides good results, although I don't zoom while shooting. 3) No experience with non-Fuji x mount lenses.
@@jblaauw Thanks for the kind words, always my pleasure. Only a parfocal lens will stay in focus while zooming. The only Fujifilm lenses that are parfocal are the MKX series of cinema lenses. If you watch cinema, you will see very few zooms in the majority of videos.
I had a chance to play with a friends A6300 recently. While it seemed like a very capable camera, its ergonomics and odd lens-to-body proportions felt awkward and weird to use. I certainly missed having more dials, and overall I just found it a bit less fun and intuitive to use than my Fuji bodies.
Hello and thank you for the thorough review. I have decided to go with the X-T30 because of higher resolution. Do you think the camera will be able to perform well with the 56mm f1.2 lens compared to the X-T3? Thank you again.
@@MaartenHeilbron Absolutely. An unrelated question please. I ordered a brand new 56mm f1.2 from Amazon sold by Adorama. I received a box that looks like it has been opened before. The lens itself doesn't look damaged and functions normally but you may suspect that it has been mounted once on a camera before. Should I return it back? Sorry to bother you with my questions.
I love all yours reviews and comparison Maarten, your way to explain things is great, easy to understand... I chose the X-T30 as my 1th ever camera, it has an original appeal, and I love it. I like the Fujifilm colors, the film simulations, and JPGs. So if you don't have time to edit the photos, you can use the JPGs thats are fantastics... Greetings from Italy!
48 years old and new to "real photography". I agonized over the decision between these two for the last month, going back and forth, even going so far as to order the Sony then cancel and finally wind up with the Fuji. I've only had it a day. Based on all the reviews online it really is splitting hairs between these two. I liked the look of the Fuji (silly but hey, for $1K, i want to like how it looks too if possible, though the Sony is cool in its own right.) Seemed like the Fuji is a little more geared towards "art of photography" and Sony to "getting the shot". I'm sure either would have been fine but I'm buying a camera now to get into a new hobby and learn photography, so the Fuji seemed like a better pick with it's manual controls. If the Fuji had a better grip and weather seal it would have been a much easier choice. Get rid of the video record limit and it's even easier. Need to do lots of learning, and have a few weeks to start doing so until the nice weather hits here. I'm excited!
Trying to get into prairie photography and learn as much photography as possible. I think the manual controls of the X-T30 will help me tinker around more and get a feel for camera settings. It also seems nice with the instant changes through the electronic viewfinder. Was going to get the X-T2, but it seems to have gone up in price in the last few days for some reason....
@@MaartenHeilbron Would you recommend someone to start with the kit lens or to purchase another one? Assuming I'll be doing some landscape and flower shots
Actually, Fujifilm's 18-55 kit lens is quite reasonable and matches the quality of the camera. It's good for those purposes. For a second lens, Fujifilm makes some excellent primes - for flowers in particular, they will provide better results (with softer backgrounds).
I wasn’t able to decide at first, but im totally going for xt30 either video or photo. Since sony way ahead in their video. The 10minutes limit on xt30 wasn’t a deal breaker, im a wedding videopher and rarely records more than 3 minutes of footages. And i really appreciate the review man. Helped me alot on deciding. Thanks again.
Great video, but I would like your opinion on which camera records the best video. I'm shopping for an affordable video camera and that would be a big help. Thanks.
Maarten, thanks as always. Wonderful dilemma having all these great cameras to choose from with that choice soon to be even more challenging with the possible announcement of a new APS-C camera from Sony later this month . I was leaning toward the fuji system but a friend has noted with his XT3 some consistent slightly inaccurate metering with his camera tending to meter a scene about 1/3-1/2 a stop darker than it is, resulting in an exposure that is always about 1/3-1/2 too bright. He also notes an issue with fairly frequent lockups/freezing . I know you have reviewed many fuji camera and IIRC you have a fuji as a personal camera and wondered if any of these issues plagued you as well . Hope your summer is going well and many thanks again
It is always my pleasure to read your kind words, thanks. A difference that small doesn't qualify as a metering error. If you need meter accuracy of that level, you'll need a real meter. In my experience, I often find I'd like to adjust the overall exposure of an image in Lightrooom. Luckily that's an adjustment that's easily made and a slight under or overexposure can be made without affecting the quality of the image. As sensors and cameras are becoming ISO invariant, accurate exposure isn't really important - even for a larger miss. I did not have issues with the X-T3, which I found to be very reliable. The original firmware for the X-H1 often locked up, particularly for video and particularly when using an external monitor. However, even those edge cases have been addressed, and I while I use my X-H1 a lot, haven't had any issues in a long time.
Enough to manage most situations, but you'll need to be prudent. The whole weather-sealing, weather-resistant thing is greatly exaggerated. Unless you have a tendency for extreme conditions, or you are unusually careless, I wouldn't worry.
I would like to ask you about Sony a6400. I want a mirrorless for high quality stills when travelling, but I’d like a tilting screen for selfies and group pics. Would you recommend Sony a6400 or is there another camera with tilting screen that is better for stills on this price range? Thank you so much for your videos.
If a titling screen is your only criteria, then Panasonic and Canon do it better on several models. However, neither makes a camera that provides the performance and features the A6400 does. Although I'm not sure whether to recommend that A6400 or the X-T30, either is substantially better than the competition's similar models.
They both provide high quality stills. For stills shooting, the Fujifilm has somewhat better controls unless you're only going to shoot auto and program.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you so much for your help. I think I'm gonna opt for the Sony because of the incredible specs. I know the controls are not very user-friendly, but practice makes perfect :)
You are the Best. Great review. Wich one would you preffer? In Your big experience wich is The best for stills and eventually video use? Thanks in advance
That depends on your needs and perceptions, the amount of post-processing you intend to do, and the requirements of your broadcaster and/or distributor. If you're producing for distribution on the web (like youtube) the answer, in my opinion, is "no".
@@markjwolfson Then you will have to check with them to determine what their standards and accepted practices are. It may depend on the content, and whether the footage is for dramatic, documentary or news programming.
@@MaartenHeilbron Let me phrase it this way. If I put side by side videos displayed on identical monitors of the same scene with the same conditions, i.e., lighting, profi, etc....would the 200MB/sec footage of the X-T30 look noticeably better than the footage recorded at 100MB/sec? What I'm getting at is...is the Fuji camera capable of recording better footage at double the frame rate of a A6400?
@@markjwolfson To start with your last question - yes, of course a higher data rate will result in more and better information. The 10 bit 4:2:2 capability is clearly superior. However, if you bring streaming bandwidth, display quality and human perception into the discussion, not all viewers will be able to discern the difference.
am confused as a mid level person in filmmaking to decide between sony and fuji ! am a filmmaker and more on too videos so can you suggest me the best option because my videos are gone for projections etc !!
Excellent comparison.Iin the end I went with the xt30 and am very happy with the choice. nice to go back to "old school" that which I grew up with. 1 year in have finally sorted out the learning curve and the changes from Pentax.Stills are excellent and the video time constraints do not bother me as I only shoot short travel video.
Good in-depth review. I have a few questions popped up and would be very grateful if you answer at least a few of them. 1) Does picture noise reduction & sharpening can be turned off for video mode? 2) Which is better in case of video dynamic range - 6400 in HLG 2020 or X-T30 in Externa with 'Dynamic Range' setting set to maximum? 3) Is it true that 6400 has some parasitic yellowish tint (even in compare to 6300/6500)? 4) Can 6400 record 4K 25fps in Super 35mm? 5) Where is better in-built audio quality? Thank you.
Thanks, I appreciate your kind words. 1) Yes, off or down 2) I have not compared these - but you'd have to have an HLG compatible TV set for HLG footage, so not really a fair comparison. 3) I did not notice that 4) I did not try the PAL settings. 5) They are about the same, XT30 offers more control.Neither have any audio quality controls.
Excellent work Maarten and thank you for the comparison! I have just picked up the X-T30 and it is my first fuji. So far I'm loving the fuji system. Those out of camera jpgs are incredible which is great for a guy like me that doesn't want to spend a lot of time in post! The affordable f2 primes are very good quality but that 16mm F1.4 is amazing. I'm a long time Sony/Minolta shooter with RX10IV, RX100V and A7III so this is new territory for me.
Really thoroughly well prepared comparison. The only thing I would suggest if I may is to just simply mention "SONY" or "FUJI" rather than repeating every time mouthful A6400 & XT30, because audience already know that the comparison is on these two model.
Both give the potential buyer a lot to think about whether which one to choose. I’d just be using it for landscapes though, but even so, that’s a lot to consider.
Awesome review! I was really considering the Fuji for the physical dials, out-of-camera image quality, lenses, and honestly the design. The autofocus on the Sony is making me reconsider. I don't shoot video so those features don't matter to me. What are you thoughts on these cameras now? I'm coming from a Nikon D5100 so either are a nice upgrade. Thanks!
@@MaartenHeilbron Good to know. I think I'm going to go with the X-T30. On B&H they currently have a kit with both 14-45mm and 50-230mm lenses for just over $1,000. I'll be sure to use the affiliate link!
Mr Maarten, Which one would be a better pick for a beginner like me? It will be my first camera and I wish to use it mainly for Portrait, Travel and Everyday photography. My options are: 1. Sony a6400 with 16-50mm kit lens (priced at $1070) 2. Sony a6400 with 18-135mm kit lens ($1380) 3. Fujifilm X-T30 with 18-55 kit lens ($1380) 4. Or do you suggest any other option? It is really hard for a newbie to choose the best camera considering many aspects 😒
Don't worry about best, but concentrate on your needs. What do you plan to do - but be fairly certain that unless you've picked something very specific (like astrophotography) that any of these are more than suitable. Then, let your wallet; your hand (how it feels/fits), how the controls meet your fingers; and your sense of style and brand preference guide your decision.
Best comparison on RUclips I’d suggest buyers also handle both cameras .... I found the Sony more awkward than the Fuji The left-sided EVF and lack of touch screen on the Sony menu made it awkward I loved the feel of the Nikon z50, but the lack of affordable lenses other than the kit zooms (with higher apertures) made it impractical. If you don’t want f2.8 zoom, and are happy with the kit lenses, that camera is worth a look
Thanks for adding those detailed observations - yes, one should most definitely put a camera in your hand before purchase. That's one of the reasons I recommend supporting your local camera store, even if that means spending a few dollars more.
I'm sure the Sony A6400 is a very good camera and gets very good results but the menu system looks really complicated to me. I bought an XT30 and that menu is fairly simple to understand and use. It's a real nuisance though, as you mentioned Maarten, that it always reverts back to the first section. I save a lot of my settings in 'My menu' and have made full use of the Q menu settings. Oh and that darned Q menu does keep popping up when I nudge it. Don't think my hand are too big, but maybe the XT3 would be better for me, otherwise the XT30 is great.
In my opinion, Panasonic has the best menu system - both from the standpoint of design (it's font works nicely on the small screen) and organization (although some recent additions are making it less well organized).
@@MaartenHeilbronThanks Maarten, I think you're right there. I have a TZ100 and the menu system is very easy. My Wife has FZ 1000 11 and I did have a G80. All good menu systems on those cameras.
I love the form of the Sony but the soul and controls of the Fuji. Will Fujifilm ever build an X camera with a flat top, a viewfinder and a tilt screen? I wish and wait, but my 8-ball says ''doubtful." Great review as always!
all the internal recording on the x-t30 (≈28min) were made with only 1 battery? and how much battery life was left? Really relaxin video comparing in complete detail every feature. Thanks :) I think im leaning towards the xt30: I really like the look (dials and size), the film simulations (for video speacially), the small lenses and bright kit lense and the pro controls for video. My only doubts are regarding the handling of the camera (I wish i could go to a store and test it), the video recording limit (more for the Overheating since I live in the tropic, a place where the avarage temps are around 35°C) and maybe the flash that cant be bounce up like the sony and the mic jack which are little inconveniences I supposed. Regardless, if I had the money I woudl certanly buy the xt30 with the 18-55mm, it makes a really good starting kit in the system.
Very difficult to decide between these two. I somehow feel the xt30 would be more enjoyable... or at least RUclips had lead me to think this way. Thanks for your videos
Do have a look at the slightly newer X-S10 (particularly if you're coming from Canon and are used to PASM - unless going PASM free interests you). ruclips.net/video/wmomwFw5yWg/видео.html
@@MaartenHeilbron thank you so much, it would’ve been perfect if it wasn’t for the fully articulated screen, I couldn’t get used to it so I’m trying to go back to tilted screen
@@Yesthankyou8 Understood, thanks for your kind words. I do have a PayPal link, and in general the commission is about 2%, so if you really feel the need - www.paypal.com/paypalme/maartech
Thanks Maarten for the nice video. I probably prefer the sony for the outstanding autofocus, mode dial, d-pad instead of joystick, wider selection of inexpensive lenses (?) and the slightly smaller size. But if any of the two had IBIS that would be the key difference, that's one of the reasons I recently bought one of the sony a7 series cameras instead....
well, I am not a very experieced photographer, I mainly use the camera for landscape and street photography, and I am interested also in wildlife and portraits. I see that several new lenses are coming out from new manufacturers which often are not stabilized (and sometimes don't have af either) so I like IBIS because it opens up a lot of possibilities for using different lenses, without restricting too much the shutter speed range or having to worry about it...
thanks for the advise. I guess that Is because a fast shutter speed not only avoids blurring due to the photographer's shaking but also that due to subject movements. And a non stabilized lens has a less complex mechanics and therefore is probably more durable and less prone to specific copy variations. And when using a tripod, the stabilized lens loses its strenght, whilst the faster one fully retains it. But all this supports the importance of ibis....
I understand the theory, I was looking for the situation(s) where you do/would use it. You can't use in-body stabilization on a tripod - it will made a smooth pan jumpy, particularly at the start. But it sounds like you're reinforcing my point - that it's somewhat over-requested.
I'm leaning towards the X-T30 but the lack of 3rd party lenses is holding me back. And most 3rd party lenses are full manual. Samyang makes lenses with AF now but they're very expensive. It's now 52 Philippine peso to a dollar.
@@FouSurLaColline Viltrox makes some x-mount autofocus lenses (I've been shooting with the 85mm). But why does this bother you? Fujifilm has an excellent and widely varied selection of lenses.
Great two part series with much more info than I could absorb in one sitting. I'm a recent switcher from Sony APS-C to Fuji. My primary reason is still valid, I think. The Price/Value of Fuji's lenses for APS-C is far more favorable for Fuji users. I think their ecosystem is a relevant point of comparison. Thanks for your comprehensive analysis, Martin.
Thanks - although you haven't seen part one yet (just finishing it).That is a good reason, however there are some nice value Sigma e mount lenses. And thanks for the kind words.
I'd buy the Sony for its superior autofocus. The unlimited recording in 4k is not a decider: I never use it. But the lenses are few and very expensive (even te base SEL models cost almost twice the equivalent Fuji). Wow! I've never seen such an in depth comparison!
Focus, sony wins, because its tracking mode can use in any object, while fuji’s is weak when there is no face in the picture. Color, fuji wins. Details, sony contains more details, although fuji’s resolution is higher. Screen, none of them is good, I prefer the fully articulating screen like that of Panasonic’s GH5.
While neither have in-body stabilization, there are stabilized lenses available. What do you do that requires in-body stabilization? Do you have it in your current camera?
you like to sit on the fence, and not offend any manufacturer with my limited knowledge obviously less than you. In summary, I think Fuji XT-30 has an edge over the A6400 end of story no need part 1 and 2 over 40min of video.
This is not sitting on the fence, I'm certainly not afraid to offend anyone - just watch the reviews, both get their (fair) share of criticism and complaint. While I felt at the start that Fujifilm might have the edge - as I said at the beginning, it's the look I prefer, however, there are just too many considerations and pain points in each. I could recommend either, I think they are perfect little mirrorless models, but best to go in understanding what the limitations will be.
I'd prefer the X-T30 over the A6400 (or any other Sony APS-C camera) since the lens selection is much better, the lenses are smaller and less pricey. Fujifilm's image quality is better or at least I like it better than Sony's. I've had the X-T20 for nearly two years and couldn't be happier. It's small, light, easy to use, offers excellent image quality and you don't have to work your way through complicated and unintuitive menus since you have hardware buttons and dials for almost all relevant functions. I understand that the X-T30 is a very decent upgrade, but since the X-T20 and X-T30 aren't worlds apart, I'll wait for another two years before I upgrade to the X-T40. ;-)
Oh? Fujifilm does make some heavy glass (50-140), and although the selection of Sony's crop lenses isn't the equivalent of the full frame in quality, they are much lighter. There are also many more third party e-mount lenses. I'd agree, the X-T20 remains an excellent camera, and the X-T30 isn't really an upgrade I'd get.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
I prefer the a6400 because of its incredible autofocus and unlimited recording. But the xt30 seems to be a smarter choice because of better lens selection.
Thumbs up for detailed comparison 👍
Thanks, and thanks for the kind words, always appreciated.
Sony has an extensive lens selection and they also have a lot of third party lens
@@moltenpros That is true. And with the wide selection of adapters, there's pretty much no lens that can't be used with an e-mount camera.
In Australia, I could get the XT30 and f2.8 ,18-55mm lens at least $200 cheaper than a6400 with f 3.6- kit lens
Sony compatible lenses are significantly more expensive, and often larger, than Fuji options.
Loved the feel of the Nikon Z50, but lack of affordable lenses at f2.8 killed that one for me, too ☹️
@@ozwrangler.c There are a lot of factors to consider.
Thanks for another complete, unbiased comparison. Really informative!👍🏻
Thank you - that's what I do my best to provide, I appreciate the kind words.
“Please tell me if there is an aspect I’ve missed?” I almost died when I heard you say that.
And you haven’t seen part one ... hopefully tomorrow.
I had a Fujifilm X-T1 for many years, the still pictures it takes are amazing, but after I start shooting family pictures I quickly saw the need for autofocus. I think this is one of the most important feature from a camera today. Almost every camera today are great, and takes amazing pictures, can you pick wrong if you look just on spec's? The ease of use, the customisations and autofocus are the reason I got the Sony A6400... great comparison mate :-) Thank you
Always nice to hear from a viewer who's found the right camera for their needs. Thanks for the kind words.
I was really torn between these two cameras. Thank you so much for the in-depth comparison!
It's a tough comparison - both have a lot to offer.
Thank you for these 2 videos.. Best comparison of these 2 cameras on youtube.
Decided to go with the Fuji xt30..
Always nice to know my videos where useful, thank you.
Thanks Maarten. Great video as always. I'm really looking forward to Part 1 when you dive into still image quality differences. I hope you talk about differences between the two cameras with SOOC jpegs. Thanks again for your thoroughness and excellent, detailed explanations!
Thanks for your kind words. I'm just finishing it, should be up tomorrow - thanks for waiting.
Sir, thank you so much! I can only imagine the amount of effort it took to make that detailed video. Very helpful! Best of luck!
It doesn't seem like a lot of time to me, as I enjoy doing it.
Do anyone concern that the super noise with A6400 as usual at 12:17？ And I was shocked by the image detail from the comparison video of part one at 16:19. Why Fuji was totally lost ？
Always glad to hear that my examples are useful for you to make your decisions, but remember it's a pretty extreme scene and not really representative of how you might light a low light scene.
Great video as always. Keep up the great work!
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words.
You dragging me into photography Mr. ! Good job
Always happy to help, thanks for the kind words.
Maarten, excellent review as usual!
A question - how is the video quality in 4k and 1080p when you use ClearImage Zoom?
Thanks!
Thanks, I do appreciate your kind words. Clear Image zoom (Sony) is a nearly noticeable loss in quality (thanks to the lower resolution of video than the image area of the sensor).
Excellent videos, thanks! I ended up going with the A6400 but it was two days of agonizing. In the end, I needed a camera that could take great video, shoot really well and act as my web cam due to the coronavirus outbreak. Despite my like for the X-T30's slightly better still pictures, the video with the Sigma 16mm 1.4 really sold it for me. Either way, both cameras are really excellent. I don't think there's a bad choice here. Just a difference in what you need more/less.
Exactly right. Thanks for the kind words.
are there any new options in 2021?
the X-E4 seems like a rangefinder equivalent with identical settings to the T-30 but the S-10 seems to be an improvement over the T-30, but all I see in the description is OIS, which at 200$ more (amazon lists the t-30 at 799 right now) I don't see as compelling enough especially since it doesn't have the discounted lenses when bought as a kit.
If you don't feel the features of the X-S10 are an improvement, I'd get the X-T30.
Difficult decision, but i ended up with the a6400. Did you observe when using the my dial settings and a custom button to cycle between 1->2->3 only works when using the rear LCD? When using the EVF I cannot cycle. I was using position 2 to control ISO.
Didn't notice that - thanks for pointing that out.
@@MaartenHeilbron I just tested it out. Toggle and cycle My dial won't operate when using EVF. Prior to using EVF, if you switch to my dial 1,2 or 3, you will have that functionality while looking through the EVF, but you won't be able to hit the custom button to switch to the next my dial. If you use my dial (1, 2 or 3) on hold button, then it will work with the EVF while you are holding that button and honor that my dial's settings. It will return to the default operation upon release. Not the most intuitive.
What an interesting anomaly, thanks for adding this detail.
Hi if i want choice between fuji x_t3 and canon eso rp what the best can you help me 😬?
What are your needs and intentions? Both are very good choices.
I think that the xt30 has some kind of tracking object function in video right? the wide/tracking. When do you record FHD 24fps do you see overheating alarm also in the xt30?
Well, not really - certainly not like the A6400. Both are much less likely to overheat in HD mode, but it depends on the temperature where you’re recording.
Hallo Maarten, thanks for your vidéo. As a Fuji lover I have a question, is it possible to charge the X-t30 with usb when the HDMI is use with the Atomos Ninja V please ? You know where i'm going to... The idea is bypass the 10min limitation recording thanks to the Atomos and to know if the combination of charging and using HDMi is fine (... and if I can buy X-t30 in place of X-t3, it's better for my wallet) Thanks for your answer. GillesR
The ports are a little tight, but yes, that works. However, you may still overheat ...
Lovely video as always.. one quick question though.. is there a colour profile in Sony which can match up to the Eterna simulation in Fuji
There is no preset that matches it. However, it is likely possible to re-create the results in post, if you're starting with the neutral creative style.
Although I haven't tried it, I'm confident that the picture profile settings do provide the controls to fully replicate Eterna, or any camera's on the A6400.
If you really want Eterna, probably best to buy a Fujifilm camera.
@@MaartenHeilbron awesome.. thanks for the quick reply.. you are great
@@arjunramkumar7 Always happy to help.
"Give the people what they want." I remember subscribers asking for this comparison and you've delivered, "delivered in spades." Fantasist, thorough job as usual.
Always nice to have your comments, thanks for the very kind words.
One of the only reviews I'll trust when comparing the 2. Thanks.
Thanks, I appreciate your confidence and kind words. Part 1 tomorrow - even more details.
I choose the XT 30 because of the lightweight wide angle lens selection. I am using this on a gimbal and trying to keep the entire set up as light as possible for wedding work, currently paired it with the new 16 f/2.8. I even tried to make the RX100 VA work but the overheating issues were horrible, couldn't even make it past 3 mins at times on a 60 degree day. The 6400 does not offer much in a 2.8 range wide angle that is not heavy besides the 16mm pancake (which is terrible) and maybe the Zeiss Touit 12 which is not the best focusing lens. Anyway... great video my friend.
I'm glad to hear that you're not having overheating issues on the X-T30. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, appreciated.
What settings do you suggest if I pass the Xt30 to a stranger on the street to help us take family pictures? Touch to focus & shoot or use face select and make sure it is prioritising the face I have selected?
Just switch it to auto. Then switch it back to return to your settings.
@@MaartenHeilbron thanks for the reply. Switching it to auto does mean the camera is shooting JPEG right. Also shooting auto doesn't necessarily mean the subjects would be 100% in focus. I'm worried that there would be other poeple in the frame and the camera would focus on them instead. Appreciate your input thanks
That's correct, no RAW in auto. However, I find this the best compromise when asking non-photographers to take photos. The fault is not usually the focus, it's the composition.
How much effort u have given..Hatsoff!💐
Thanks a lot, always nice to have my work recognized.
i came from a d90 wich camera will you advice to improce sharpness of picture (picture of protrait of my daughter and when she plays)?
Unless the scene is dark, or changing too quickly to focus properly, it's not likely.
The D90 is a good camera with a good sensor - the rest depends on the lenses and on you, particularly the settings you use.
@@MaartenHeilbron hi...thanks for your answer...i have 3 lenses: nikkor 50mm 1.8g, nikkor 70-200mm and nikkor 18-105mm...i still feel missing sharpen on picture even if some are nice...
And the d90 is a second hand...so i guess i'll have to check the number total of pictures taken cause it's not unlimited...
@@romualdb5968 Maybe you just need to take some time to perfect the right settings and method you're using for focus. That gear should provide sharp photos.
@@MaartenHeilbron Hi Maarten i guess you are right i'll need lessons to improve i'm a beginner :)
@@romualdb5968 Lessons, or just trying the various settings and your way to select a focus point and take a photo.
Wow, I just had to comment on how awesome your reviews and comparison videos are. When you say "super detailed" you sure mean it! (and there's still a part one coming, wow!)
Thank you for these great in-depth videos! Looking forward to (hopefully) a future "best video settings for the Fuji X-T30"
Oh, and these are both such amazing cameras. It was a really tough choice to make but I chose the X-T30 because once I held it in my hands at the store, I just knew it was the one. The A6400 has some really great features (like the autofocus) but I love having my camera with me all the time and the X-T30 just makes me happy to have it out with me and is good enough for what I need it for. The A6400 is a camera I would take out to a shoot when I need it, but the X-T30 is the camera I want to carry around all the time.
Thanks for your kind words, they are appreciated. You will enjoy part one, particularly the focus bit.
Great comparison! Considering 2 camera body also need to consider choice of lens and battery grip, battery life. It's good to add these general information in the summary section. Cheers!
Thanks, appreciate the kind words. Yes, good points. Lenses in part one (today) but accessories would be an interesing topic.
Excellent and detailed comparison, thanks! I'm looking at the X-T30 because I like it's physical style, quality of the images, and the variety of affordable lenses including the 18-55mm F2.8-4 which is what I like to use as an every day shooter. I don't think Sony has any good options for a fast standard zoom.
I appreciate the kind words - and those are valid reasons to choose the X-T30.
Thanks for the review! Very well done! I am wondering your thoughts on the similar priced Sony a7ii vs the Sony a6400 to go full frame instead? Thanks!
At this point I feel the A6400 is a little more full-featured with better AF. I don't think that most of us can appreciate the full frame sensor.
Sir which is good for sony a6400 or fugifilim xt30 for wildlife photogharaphy and sport photogharaphy
Both are good. Sony does a better job with tracking for autofocus, which might be useful in those situations.
Maarten, excellent review as usual! I am new to Sony and have a A6500, Excellent overview of the A6400 menus, made it seem clearer to me than before. Soooo many options today!
Thanks, I do appreciate the kind words.
Hello Maarten. Thanks for the detailed review! I am trying to seriously consider the xt30 for video.( I am convinced on the stills side). I Wonder If adding an external recorder would prevent the heating risk. Did you try shooting thr xt30 as long as possible with the external recorder? I would love to know that. Thanks a lot
I'm sorry, I did not test that. In my experience with other models where i have tried that, it's not usually a solution, or a best provides a few more minutes.
hello, do you know if the sony can track you on video at 4k , 24-30fps ?
Yes, it's possible to use the AF-C mode with video, and it does a reasonable job. However, it does not reliably detect all faces in all situations.
Sir thanks for the info. But you have not touched on their EVF. Are they usable like the a7III. Or rather how good are their EVFs.
They are not are good as the A7III, but they are more than usable. These two have nearly identical viewfinder specifications.
Thanks a lot, sir it was a huge help and a very detailed review. Huge respect for you coz of the effort you put in.
Glad it helped, always nice to hear from a viewer who appreciates my videos.
Mr Marteeen Kindly advise me i want camera for video shoot and photography kindly advise me which one is best sony a6600 or fujifilm xt30
i m wating from your reply after that i will order
They're both great cameras. I'm kind of partial to the Fujifilm interface (physical and menu) so that would be my choice - but I would suggest that you let your wallet, your hand and your design/style preference make your decision.
Good one!
Seem like T30 is better for videos while it'll require an external recorder to utilize high-end functions. Would you like to suggest a few 4K external recorders for T30?
Thanks! Always nice to see your avatar. Any recorder from Atomos that supports 4K/30 is suitable. They come in various sizes, you don't need (for the X-T30 anyway) one that supports a higher frame rate.
@@MaartenHeilbron 🙏🙏🙏
1. I find Atomos Ninja Flame suitable. What do you say?
2. Would you like to make some lens recommendations especially for videos?
3. And if I choose not to go with Fujinon lenses, which brand may work for me?
Always happy to help.
1) It is suitable.
2) The MKX series, but I use the 16-55 and it provides good results, although I don't zoom while shooting.
3) No experience with non-Fuji x mount lenses.
@@jblaauw Thanks for the kind words, always my pleasure.
Only a parfocal lens will stay in focus while zooming.
The only Fujifilm lenses that are parfocal are the MKX series of cinema lenses.
If you watch cinema, you will see very few zooms in the majority of videos.
I had a chance to play with a friends A6300 recently. While it seemed like a very capable camera, its ergonomics and odd lens-to-body proportions felt awkward and weird to use. I certainly missed having more dials, and overall I just found it a bit less fun and intuitive to use than my Fuji bodies.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, I understand.
@@MaartenHeilbron no problem Maarten, keep up the great videos !
Always happy to help.
Excellent review, Maarten. I have a X-H1 and X-T3. I am contemplating trading in my X-H1 for the X-T30. What do you think?
While the X-T30 is an excellent camera, I would not trade my X-H1 in for it. However, if you don't use video, maybe.
Hello and thank you for the thorough review. I have decided to go with the X-T30 because of higher resolution. Do you think the camera will be able to perform well with the 56mm f1.2 lens compared to the X-T3? Thank you again.
Always a pleasure to hear from a viewer who appreciates my work. Yes, in most ways, particularly for stills, the X-T3 and X-T30 are comparable.
@@MaartenHeilbron Absolutely. I believe everyone was able to actually learn by watching your review. Thank you very much!
@@zabooog That's very kind, thanks.
@@MaartenHeilbron Absolutely. An unrelated question please. I ordered a brand new 56mm f1.2 from Amazon sold by Adorama. I received a box that looks like it has been opened before. The lens itself doesn't look damaged and functions normally but you may suspect that it has been mounted once on a camera before. Should I return it back? Sorry to bother you with my questions.
@@zabooog I would contact Adorama and ask what happened.
part 1 coming soon ?....ahhhh man...I was getting crazy looking for part 1.....let me activate the bell...
Sorry, working as fast as I can. Today, I promise.
Don´t worry Maarten , take your time !!!....Its just that I thought that part 1 was in somewhere else place in your channel.
It's done and uploaded now.
I love all yours reviews and comparison Maarten, your way to explain things is great,
easy to understand...
I chose the X-T30 as my 1th ever camera, it has an original appeal, and I love it. I like the Fujifilm colors, the film simulations, and JPGs. So if you don't have time to edit the photos, you can use the JPGs thats are fantastics...
Greetings from Italy!
Thanks for your kind words and sharing your thoughts about the X-T30. Please say hello to all my friends in Italy.
48 years old and new to "real photography". I agonized over the decision between these two for the last month, going back and forth, even going so far as to order the Sony then cancel and finally wind up with the Fuji. I've only had it a day. Based on all the reviews online it really is splitting hairs between these two. I liked the look of the Fuji (silly but hey, for $1K, i want to like how it looks too if possible, though the Sony is cool in its own right.) Seemed like the Fuji is a little more geared towards "art of photography" and Sony to "getting the shot". I'm sure either would have been fine but I'm buying a camera now to get into a new hobby and learn photography, so the Fuji seemed like a better pick with it's manual controls. If the Fuji had a better grip and weather seal it would have been a much easier choice. Get rid of the video record limit and it's even easier. Need to do lots of learning, and have a few weeks to start doing so until the nice weather hits here. I'm excited!
It sounds like you have made an excellent choice.
Trying to get into prairie photography and learn as much photography as possible. I think the manual controls of the X-T30 will help me tinker around more and get a feel for camera settings. It also seems nice with the instant changes through the electronic viewfinder. Was going to get the X-T2, but it seems to have gone up in price in the last few days for some reason....
Yes, the physical, manual controls certainly give you a better feeling of control.
@@MaartenHeilbron Would you recommend someone to start with the kit lens or to purchase another one? Assuming I'll be doing some landscape and flower shots
Actually, Fujifilm's 18-55 kit lens is quite reasonable and matches the quality of the camera. It's good for those purposes. For a second lens, Fujifilm makes some excellent primes - for flowers in particular, they will provide better results (with softer backgrounds).
I wasn’t able to decide at first, but im totally going for xt30 either video or photo. Since sony way ahead in their video. The 10minutes limit on xt30 wasn’t a deal breaker, im a wedding videopher and rarely records more than 3 minutes of footages. And i really appreciate the review man. Helped me alot on deciding. Thanks again.
Always nice to hear that I've provided the information you needed to make a decision. Thanks for commenting.
Great video, but I would like your opinion on which camera records the best video. I'm shopping for an affordable video camera and that would be a big help. Thanks.
Thanks for the kind words. Fujifilm's higher data rate has to be balanced against Sony's unlimited recording time, so not easy to make a call there.
@@MaartenHeilbron for shooting b-roll, having limited recording time wouldn't be a problem then sire?
@@megatazman5129 I can't imagine that any piece of b-roll would be longer than 30 minutes.
Maarten, thanks as always. Wonderful dilemma having all these great cameras to choose from with that choice soon to be even more challenging with the possible announcement of a new APS-C camera from Sony later this month . I was leaning toward the fuji system but a friend has noted with his XT3 some consistent slightly inaccurate metering with his camera tending to meter a scene about 1/3-1/2 a stop darker than it is, resulting in an exposure that is always about 1/3-1/2 too bright. He also notes an issue with fairly frequent lockups/freezing . I know you have reviewed many fuji camera and IIRC you have a fuji as a personal camera and wondered if any of these issues plagued you as well . Hope your summer is going well and many thanks again
It is always my pleasure to read your kind words, thanks. A difference that small doesn't qualify as a metering error. If you need meter accuracy of that level, you'll need a real meter. In my experience, I often find I'd like to adjust the overall exposure of an image in Lightrooom. Luckily that's an adjustment that's easily made and a slight under or overexposure can be made without affecting the quality of the image. As sensors and cameras are becoming ISO invariant, accurate exposure isn't really important - even for a larger miss.
I did not have issues with the X-T3, which I found to be very reliable. The original firmware for the X-H1 often locked up, particularly for video and particularly when using an external monitor. However, even those edge cases have been addressed, and I while I use my X-H1 a lot, haven't had any issues in a long time.
@@MaartenHeilbron thanks for the reply Maarten....much appreciated
I'm always happy to help, thanks for the kind words.
I thought the a6400 has weather sealing.
Enough to manage most situations, but you'll need to be prudent. The whole weather-sealing, weather-resistant thing is greatly exaggerated. Unless you have a tendency for extreme conditions, or you are unusually careless, I wouldn't worry.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you.
I would like to ask you about Sony a6400. I want a mirrorless for high quality stills when travelling, but I’d like a tilting screen for selfies and group pics. Would you recommend Sony a6400 or is there another camera with tilting screen that is better for stills on this price range? Thank you so much for your videos.
If a titling screen is your only criteria, then Panasonic and Canon do it better on several models. However, neither makes a camera that provides the performance and features the A6400 does. Although I'm not sure whether to recommend that A6400 or the X-T30, either is substantially better than the competition's similar models.
Thanks so much for your prompt reply. Yes, I have two criteria: the tilting screen and high quality stills
They both provide high quality stills. For stills shooting, the Fujifilm has somewhat better controls unless you're only going to shoot auto and program.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you so much for your help. I think I'm gonna opt for the Sony because of the incredible specs. I know the controls are not very user-friendly, but practice makes perfect :)
I'm always happy to help.
You mentioned that the a6400 crops in at 4k30, how much of a crop exactly?
It's demonstrated in my review of the A6400: ruclips.net/video/JisbELHAXBM/видео.html
You are the Best. Great review. Wich one would you preffer? In Your big experience wich is The best for stills and eventually video use?
Thanks in advance
I thought I summed it up - both have advantages and shortcomings - you have to decide for you.
Does the higher data record rate on the X-T30 result in noticeably better video image quality?
That depends on your needs and perceptions, the amount of post-processing you intend to do, and the requirements of your broadcaster and/or distributor. If you're producing for distribution on the web (like youtube) the answer, in my opinion, is "no".
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you for the reply. What about if the footage is for broadcast use?
@@markjwolfson Then you will have to check with them to determine what their standards and accepted practices are. It may depend on the content, and whether the footage is for dramatic, documentary or news programming.
@@MaartenHeilbron Let me phrase it this way. If I put side by side videos displayed on identical monitors of the same scene with the same conditions, i.e., lighting, profi, etc....would the 200MB/sec footage of the X-T30 look noticeably better than the footage recorded at 100MB/sec? What I'm getting at is...is the Fuji camera capable of recording better footage at double the frame rate of a A6400?
@@markjwolfson To start with your last question - yes, of course a higher data rate will result in more and better information. The 10 bit 4:2:2 capability is clearly superior. However, if you bring streaming bandwidth, display quality and human perception into the discussion, not all viewers will be able to discern the difference.
am confused as a mid level person in filmmaking to decide between sony and fuji ! am a filmmaker and more on too videos
so can you suggest me the best option because my videos are gone for projections etc !!
The A6400 has unlimited recording and is less likely to overheat, but it's data rate is lower. Paired with an external recorder it would be my choice.
Excellent detailed comparison
Glad to hear you found it worthwhile. Thanks for commenting.
Great review. Thanks!
Always nice to hear from a viewer who appreciates my work.
Excellent comparison.Iin the end I went with the xt30 and am very happy with the choice. nice to go back to "old school" that which I grew up with. 1 year in have finally sorted out the learning curve and the changes from Pentax.Stills are excellent and the video time constraints do not bother me as I only shoot short travel video.
Thanks for the kind words - glad to hear you have found your workflow.
Your videos helped me decide that the Sony a6400 is right for me. I'm in heaven with it! Thank you!
Thanks, it's always a pleasure to know that my videos provide useful information.
Quality information, thanks 🤩
My pleasure! Thanks for taking the time to comment.
nothing is more detail than ur review sir!!!
Thanks you, that's what I strive for. I appreciate the kind words.
Fuji menu is still confusing for me, and my friend Fuji XT30 glitches after 3k shots, BUT fuji manual dials is so much faster than the best menu
I find both to be very reliable cameras.
@@MaartenHeilbron of course sony had made a lot of a6000 series and fuji had made an equal if not more x series camera.
Yes, good point.
Good in-depth review. I have a few questions popped up and would be very grateful if you answer at least a few of them. 1) Does picture noise reduction & sharpening can be turned off for video mode? 2) Which is better in case of video dynamic range - 6400 in HLG 2020 or X-T30 in Externa with 'Dynamic Range' setting set to maximum? 3) Is it true that 6400 has some parasitic yellowish tint (even in compare to 6300/6500)? 4) Can 6400 record 4K 25fps in Super 35mm? 5) Where is better in-built audio quality? Thank you.
Thanks, I appreciate your kind words.
1) Yes, off or down
2) I have not compared these - but you'd have to have an HLG compatible TV set for HLG footage, so not really a fair comparison.
3) I did not notice that
4) I did not try the PAL settings.
5) They are about the same, XT30 offers more control.Neither have any audio quality controls.
Excellent work Maarten and thank you for the comparison! I have just picked up the X-T30 and it is my first fuji. So far I'm loving the fuji system. Those out of camera jpgs are incredible which is great for a guy like me that doesn't want to spend a lot of time in post! The affordable f2 primes are very good quality but that 16mm F1.4 is amazing. I'm a long time Sony/Minolta shooter with RX10IV, RX100V and A7III so this is new territory for me.
Always nice to hear from a photographer who's found a camera they love, thanks for the kind words.
you really do reply to every comment 😂. I got an x-t30. I just love the way it feels.
Glad to hear you were able to decide between these two.
Really thoroughly well prepared comparison. The only thing I would suggest if I may is to just simply mention "SONY" or "FUJI" rather than repeating every time mouthful A6400 & XT30, because audience already know that the comparison is on these two model.
Thanks for your kind words and your suggestion. I felt I needed to make it clear.
Both give the potential buyer a lot to think about whether which one to choose. I’d just be using it for landscapes though, but even so, that’s a lot to consider.
Thanks for your thoughts, it is a lot to consider.
Awesome review! I was really considering the Fuji for the physical dials, out-of-camera image quality, lenses, and honestly the design. The autofocus on the Sony is making me reconsider. I don't shoot video so those features don't matter to me. What are you thoughts on these cameras now? I'm coming from a Nikon D5100 so either are a nice upgrade. Thanks!
With firmware upgrades, both have improved, both excellent choices.
@@MaartenHeilbron Good to know. I think I'm going to go with the X-T30. On B&H they currently have a kit with both 14-45mm and 50-230mm lenses for just over $1,000. I'll be sure to use the affiliate link!
Thanks, always nice to know I've been able to provide assistance in making your choice.
where is part 1?
In progress, I need another day or two to finish.
I want to buy my first camera to start my short film making ... Which camera should i prefer? Mm
Either of these could be a good choice - I've provided a lot of detail in these videos to help you decide.
Mr Maarten, Which one would be a better pick for a beginner like me? It will be my first camera and I wish to use it mainly for Portrait, Travel and Everyday photography. My options are:
1. Sony a6400 with 16-50mm kit lens (priced at $1070)
2. Sony a6400 with 18-135mm kit lens ($1380)
3. Fujifilm X-T30 with 18-55 kit lens ($1380)
4. Or do you suggest any other option?
It is really hard for a newbie to choose the best camera considering many aspects 😒
Don't worry about best, but concentrate on your needs. What do you plan to do - but be fairly certain that unless you've picked something very specific (like astrophotography) that any of these are more than suitable.
Then, let your wallet; your hand (how it feels/fits), how the controls meet your fingers; and your sense of style and brand preference guide your decision.
@@MaartenHeilbron Do you think a6400 with 18-135 lens is better option to X-T30 with 18-55 lens when both are available at the same price?
@@ravikiran0092 I would judge them as both the same. The Fujifilm lens although it has less range, is better quality.
@@MaartenHeilbron thank you
Well explained 👏👏😍
A pleasure to read your kind words and emojis.
Top notch show hosting. Your channel should be on cable TV.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
For travelling, both will do the job, they are small with full functionality, but i prefer the X-T3.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
I'm confused, why part 2 before part 1 (coming soon)?
Planning accident. Sorry.
Thanks for sharing... Have a good one.
Alway my pleasure, thanks for the kind words.
Best comparison on RUclips
I’d suggest buyers also handle both cameras ....
I found the Sony more awkward than the Fuji
The left-sided EVF and lack of touch screen on the Sony menu made it awkward
I loved the feel of the Nikon z50, but the lack of affordable lenses other than the kit zooms (with higher apertures) made it impractical. If you don’t want f2.8 zoom, and are happy with the kit lenses, that camera is worth a look
Thanks for adding those detailed observations - yes, one should most definitely put a camera in your hand before purchase. That's one of the reasons I recommend supporting your local camera store, even if that means spending a few dollars more.
I like the six foe. Fits my hand better, I prefer the buttons and knobs, the flip screen plus the whole thing feels more intuitive to me.
Great reasons, thanks for commenting.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks for the video and reply.
Always my pleasure.
I'm sure the Sony A6400 is a very good camera and gets very good results but the menu system looks really complicated to me. I bought an XT30 and that menu is fairly simple to understand and use. It's a real nuisance though, as you mentioned Maarten, that it always reverts back to the first section. I save a lot of my settings in 'My menu' and have made full use of the Q menu settings. Oh and that darned Q menu does keep popping up when I nudge it. Don't think my hand are too big, but maybe the XT3 would be better for me, otherwise the XT30 is great.
In my opinion, Panasonic has the best menu system - both from the standpoint of design (it's font works nicely on the small screen) and organization (although some recent additions are making it less well organized).
@@MaartenHeilbronThanks Maarten, I think you're right there. I have a TZ100 and the menu system is very easy. My Wife has FZ 1000 11 and I did have a G80. All good menu systems on those cameras.
I love the form of the Sony but the soul and controls of the Fuji. Will Fujifilm ever build an X camera with a flat top, a viewfinder and a tilt screen? I wish and wait, but my 8-ball says ''doubtful." Great review as always!
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words - and your thoughts. Yes, doubtful on all except the tilt screen - I'm hoping for that.
I'm a beginner, video is priority.
Please suggest between xt30 and xt4
The X-T4 is the best consumer APS-C camera for video production.
@@MaartenHeilbron thank you the reply
why fuji don't show real red color?
What are you referring to?
all the internal recording on the x-t30 (≈28min) were made with only 1 battery? and how much battery life was left?
Really relaxin video comparing in complete detail every feature. Thanks :)
I think im leaning towards the xt30: I really like the look (dials and size), the film simulations (for video speacially), the small lenses and bright kit lense and the pro controls for video. My only doubts are regarding the handling of the camera (I wish i could go to a store and test it), the video recording limit (more for the Overheating since I live in the tropic, a place where the avarage temps are around 35°C) and maybe the flash that cant be bounce up like the sony and the mic jack which are little inconveniences I supposed.
Regardless, if I had the money I woudl certanly buy the xt30 with the 18-55mm, it makes a really good starting kit in the system.
Yes, both will record about 100 minutes on a battery. Thanks for the kind words.
but does one come in red?
I should have mentioned that sadly, neither of them do.
Mr Maarten..Thank You so much...
Thank you for your kind words, appreciated.
Very difficult to decide between these two. I somehow feel the xt30 would be more enjoyable... or at least RUclips had lead me to think this way. Thanks for your videos
Do have a look at the slightly newer X-S10 (particularly if you're coming from Canon and are used to PASM - unless going PASM free interests you). ruclips.net/video/wmomwFw5yWg/видео.html
@@MaartenHeilbron thank you so much, it would’ve been perfect if it wasn’t for the fully articulated screen, I couldn’t get used to it so I’m trying to go back to tilted screen
@@MaartenHeilbron I wish you had affiliated links in the UK too
@@Yesthankyou8 Understood, thanks for your kind words. I do have a PayPal link, and in general the commission is about 2%, so if you really feel the need - www.paypal.com/paypalme/maartech
Thanks Maarten for the nice video. I probably prefer the sony for the outstanding autofocus, mode dial, d-pad instead of joystick, wider selection of inexpensive lenses (?) and the slightly smaller size. But if any of the two had IBIS that would be the key difference, that's one of the reasons I recently bought one of the sony a7 series cameras instead....
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I"m intrigued by your need for in body stabilization. What are the situations where you would use it?
well, I am not a very experieced photographer, I mainly use the camera for landscape and street photography, and I am interested also in wildlife and portraits. I see that several new lenses are coming out from new manufacturers which often are not stabilized (and sometimes don't have af either) so I like IBIS because it opens up a lot of possibilities for using different lenses, without restricting too much the shutter speed range or having to worry about it...
Understood. I would always prefer a faster lens over a stabilized one.
thanks for the advise. I guess that Is because a fast shutter speed not only avoids blurring due to the photographer's shaking but also that due to subject movements. And a non stabilized lens has a less complex mechanics and therefore is probably more durable and less prone to specific copy variations. And when using a tripod, the stabilized lens loses its strenght, whilst the faster one fully retains it. But all this supports the importance of ibis....
I understand the theory, I was looking for the situation(s) where you do/would use it. You can't use in-body stabilization on a tripod - it will made a smooth pan jumpy, particularly at the start. But it sounds like you're reinforcing my point - that it's somewhat over-requested.
I still cannot decide w/c one to buy.
Wow - and I did provide a LOT of details here.
I'm leaning towards the X-T30 but the lack of 3rd party lenses is holding me back. And most 3rd party lenses are full manual. Samyang makes lenses with AF now but they're very expensive. It's now 52 Philippine peso to a dollar.
@@FouSurLaColline Viltrox makes some x-mount autofocus lenses (I've been shooting with the 85mm). But why does this bother you? Fujifilm has an excellent and widely varied selection of lenses.
Thank you. It's so nice of you. More power.
I like XT30 but I still thinking about Full frame 6D Mark2 😔
It is fun to think about the 6DMII.
Hi sir..please tell me X-T30 is Environmentally packed or not ?
I do not understand what "environmentally packed" means.
Great two part series with much more info than I could absorb in one sitting. I'm a recent switcher from Sony APS-C to Fuji. My primary reason is still valid, I think. The Price/Value of Fuji's lenses for APS-C is far more favorable for Fuji users. I think their ecosystem is a relevant point of comparison. Thanks for your comprehensive analysis, Martin.
Thanks - although you haven't seen part one yet (just finishing it).That is a good reason, however there are some nice value Sigma e mount lenses. And thanks for the kind words.
I guess I got it conflated with the earlier videos about the xt 30. My bad and Im looking forward to part 1.@@MaartenHeilbron
Yes, sorry, a lot of X-T30 content.
Not entirely true, but certainly a very limited choice in comparison.
I'd buy the Sony for its superior autofocus. The unlimited recording in 4k is not a decider: I never use it. But the lenses are few and very expensive (even te base SEL models cost almost twice the equivalent Fuji).
Wow! I've never seen such an in depth comparison!
Thanks, a pleasure to read your kind words. There really are lots of e-mount lenses, not just from Sony. Have a look at the third party selection.
Focus, sony wins, because its tracking mode can use in any object, while fuji’s is weak when there is no face in the picture.
Color, fuji wins.
Details, sony contains more details, although fuji’s resolution is higher.
Screen, none of them is good, I prefer the fully articulating screen like that of Panasonic’s GH5.
Good points, thanks for sharing your notes.
Fuji looks better, and Sony's eye detect is more accurate.
I see you're also finding it hard to choose ...
While neither have in-body stabilization, there are stabilized lenses available. What do you do that requires in-body stabilization? Do you have it in your current camera?
Thanks for clarifying.I would always prefer a faster lens over a stabilized one.
Where have I heard that before?
I have, and find I have little use for it. What are the situations where you find it useful? Certainly not video.
I lost value promocional..
Oh dear.
you like to sit on the fence, and not offend any manufacturer with my limited knowledge obviously less than you. In summary, I think Fuji XT-30 has an edge over the A6400 end of story no need part 1 and 2 over 40min of video.
This is not sitting on the fence, I'm certainly not afraid to offend anyone - just watch the reviews, both get their (fair) share of criticism and complaint. While I felt at the start that Fujifilm might have the edge - as I said at the beginning, it's the look I prefer, however, there are just too many considerations and pain points in each. I could recommend either, I think they are perfect little mirrorless models, but best to go in understanding what the limitations will be.
I'd prefer the X-T30 over the A6400 (or any other Sony APS-C camera) since the lens selection is much better, the lenses are smaller and less pricey. Fujifilm's image quality is better or at least I like it better than Sony's. I've had the X-T20 for nearly two years and couldn't be happier. It's small, light, easy to use, offers excellent image quality and you don't have to work your way through complicated and unintuitive menus since you have hardware buttons and dials for almost all relevant functions. I understand that the X-T30 is a very decent upgrade, but since the X-T20 and X-T30 aren't worlds apart, I'll wait for another two years before I upgrade to the X-T40. ;-)
Oh? Fujifilm does make some heavy glass (50-140), and although the selection of Sony's crop lenses isn't the equivalent of the full frame in quality, they are much lighter. There are also many more third party e-mount lenses. I'd agree, the X-T20 remains an excellent camera, and the X-T30 isn't really an upgrade I'd get.
Already in the first video my choice was the Fuji, and this video hasn't changed that.
However, my final choice was given in advance: None of them.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts - always nice to have your comments on my work.