🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:29 🚀 *Microsoft 365 Copilot enhances productivity by using large language models in various Microsoft apps.* 01:27 🗨️ *Large language models (LLMs) generate responses based on prompts and context provided.* 03:20 🧠 *LLMs retain conversation context temporarily and don't use it for training.* 04:46 ☁️ *Microsoft 365 Copilot uses private LLM instances and employs an orchestration engine.* 06:46 📝 *Copilot helps generate content by combining LLM knowledge with user-selected inputs.* Made with HARPA AI
Thanks for Sharing Nick - it’s interesting to see it working and its limitations at the moment and you can certainly see it’s a ‘V1’ product and therefore let’s hope Microsoft keep rolling out the updates to improve it further 😊
Thanks for watching Scott. In my view the inclusion right there in the app will be the game changer for bringing this tech to the masses. There are clearly product improvements to be made but with something like Copilot in Word, the workflow impact of being able to do it all right there rather than jumping around different tools is the differentiator.
Microsoft Copilot: Bloatware meet Massively Huge and Useless Bloatware. I can appreciate that Artificial Intelligence has its place in Society, especially in highly technical and demanding professions. But on a personal computer, how challenging can it actually be for a reasonably intelligent human being to actually do things themselves? In a few years, how illiterate are people going to become when more and more they rely on technology to do everything for them? Just look at the written comments online now. Most barely know how to use words properly or construct a coherent sentence, let alone a complete paragraph. Copilot For Dummies!
It’s right to be aware of risks around the deployment of this technology both from the technology itself AND its impact on its users. However, I’m sure the same set of arguments existed to some extent with the transition from the typewriter to the computer, or with the addition of spellcheck. Thousands of years of human history tell us the introduction of technologies to allow us to do things we were already doing but in an easier way have quite the opposite impact on average than you are suggesting. Will it negatively impact some? Probably. Will it negatively impact overall? There’s no reason to think so based on the history of similarly disruptive tech.
I find this kind of thinking lacking in objectivity. such technologies allow people like me, a freelancer, to save time on working on my business and have more time to actually design. co-pilot is going to supplement my virtual assistant cost and potentially make me more money. Instead of as you say "do it myself" ... and make less money as a result of doing everything myself, and thus have to spend more time working on my business, and ironically make even less money. That is not very intelligent. I was prepared to hire someone next year for many of the things I need, but now I don't have to.
@@lifeisagift.cherisheverymoment different outlook on technology. these things are tools. imagine how silly it was for someone to discount the invention of an electrical screwdriver because we can screw things ourselves. same relationship. technology buys back our time.
@@eingoluq Look at the lack of literacy of the United States of America compared to other developed nations on all important educational metrics. Too much reliance on technology isn't serving the wealthiest country in the world well. Wealth isn't the only measure of success that matters. Perhaps to a Capitalist, but when China and India get their acts together, the most populous nations in the world will vastly eclipse the USA, then what? Tools are simply that: Tools. There is no substitute for human talent. Even in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Unless you want A.I. to eclipse human beings.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:29 🚀 *Microsoft 365 Copilot enhances productivity by using large language models in various Microsoft apps.*
01:27 🗨️ *Large language models (LLMs) generate responses based on prompts and context provided.*
03:20 🧠 *LLMs retain conversation context temporarily and don't use it for training.*
04:46 ☁️ *Microsoft 365 Copilot uses private LLM instances and employs an orchestration engine.*
06:46 📝 *Copilot helps generate content by combining LLM knowledge with user-selected inputs.*
Made with HARPA AI
Thanks for Sharing Nick - it’s interesting to see it working and its limitations at the moment and you can certainly see it’s a ‘V1’ product and therefore let’s hope Microsoft keep rolling out the updates to improve it further 😊
Thanks for watching Scott. In my view the inclusion right there in the app will be the game changer for bringing this tech to the masses. There are clearly product improvements to be made but with something like Copilot in Word, the workflow impact of being able to do it all right there rather than jumping around different tools is the differentiator.
Very useful sir, thanks for demonstrating this out. We are discussing whether we take the dip in the pool now or to wait.
Thanks for watching. Just make sure you hit all the purchase requirements if you’re thinking of buying now:
ruclips.net/video/q1KLPfKvziY/видео.html
Microsoft Copilot: Bloatware meet Massively Huge and Useless Bloatware. I can appreciate that Artificial Intelligence has its place in Society, especially in highly technical and demanding professions. But on a personal computer, how challenging can it actually be for a reasonably intelligent human being to actually do things themselves? In a few years, how illiterate are people going to become when more and more they rely on technology to do everything for them? Just look at the written comments online now. Most barely know how to use words properly or construct a coherent sentence, let alone a complete paragraph. Copilot For Dummies!
It’s right to be aware of risks around the deployment of this technology both from the technology itself AND its impact on its users. However, I’m sure the same set of arguments existed to some extent with the transition from the typewriter to the computer, or with the addition of spellcheck. Thousands of years of human history tell us the introduction of technologies to allow us to do things we were already doing but in an easier way have quite the opposite impact on average than you are suggesting. Will it negatively impact some? Probably. Will it negatively impact overall? There’s no reason to think so based on the history of similarly disruptive tech.
I find this kind of thinking lacking in objectivity. such technologies allow people like me, a freelancer, to save time on working on my business and have more time to actually design. co-pilot is going to supplement my virtual assistant cost and potentially make me more money.
Instead of as you say "do it myself" ... and make less money as a result of doing everything myself, and thus have to spend more time working on my business, and ironically make even less money.
That is not very intelligent. I was prepared to hire someone next year for many of the things I need, but now I don't have to.
@@eingoluq
Different mindset. Different objective.
@@lifeisagift.cherisheverymoment different outlook on technology. these things are tools. imagine how silly it was for someone to discount the invention of an electrical screwdriver because we can screw things ourselves.
same relationship. technology buys back our time.
@@eingoluq
Look at the lack of literacy of the United States of America compared to other developed nations on all important educational metrics. Too much reliance on technology isn't serving the wealthiest country in the world well. Wealth isn't the only measure of success that matters. Perhaps to a Capitalist, but when China and India get their acts together, the most populous nations in the world will vastly eclipse the USA, then what? Tools are simply that: Tools. There is no substitute for human talent. Even in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Unless you want A.I. to eclipse human beings.