This left out all the juicy, hardcore stuff - and it was actually quite refreshing. An historical outline that tries very had to not make either side look bad.
6:00 If you are going to use the term Palestine from now on to decribe the entire area. Then how come the Romans used the term Judea to decscribe it prior to the Bar-Kochva revolt of 162AC?
@@arielg.2681 Judea referred to a smaller territory centered on the former Jewish Kingdom of Judah and the Hasmonean Kingdom (which was created in the Maccabean revolt in the territory of Judah and conquered by Pompey). Palestine referred to a larger area from Syria to Egypt. This nomenclature was established by the Greeks centuries before the Romans. Judea is the hellenized version of the name Judah and Palestine was used by the Greeks to describe the entire coastal Levant.
What we need to remember is that there was not a Palestine under the Ottomans. This identity was decided on by colonialists. We have the descendants of Jews who converted and some Jews who had never converted or gone abroad and returnees from the diaspora. The contention of the Palestinians that they are a people is a very modern construct
One of the earliest known figures to self-identify as a Palestinian in written records is al-Muqaddasi, born in Jerusalem around 946 CE. A Palestinian Arab scholar, al-Muqaddasi was a pioneer in systematic geography. In Ottoman maps the region was named Palestine. It was not an administrative district but a geographic area for the Ottomans. The Filistin Risalesi which translates in English to the Palestinian Treatise, was a military manual published in 1915 for officers of the Ottoman 8th Army Corps. see more here: ruclips.net/video/ICaIkwEK35A/видео.html
Very well researched, was surprised at the academic rigor of this video. The narrative presented here is unpopular among Jews and Palestinians, but nevertheless accurate.
You know the content creator and he asked you to balance the rightfully hostile comments. I won't insult you by thinking that you believe this piece of...
@@Iditsl hostile remarks that can't cite one fact to challenge anything in the video. I'm sorry that the science and the history doesn't affirm your political agenda. Science has no political bias. DNA doesnt care what you would like to believe is true. and I have no idea who khoas7044 is.
@History.Culture.projects-y5m it is preposterous from a pseudo historian to pretend that history and archaeology that are taught in universities (i.e. mainstream academic consensus) have political agendas. The facts are undisputed, because they are validated by ancient text and archeological discoveries but their interpretation can vary according to the authors. Your version is fantasy, and obviously delivers a political agenda: Palestine is forever. I am not going to pick each lie, half truth and approximation you utter. "Frequently, people who engage in pseudoarchaeology have a very strict interpretation of evidence and are unwilling to alter their stance, resulting in interpretations that often appear overly simplistic and fail to capture the complexity and nuance of the complete narrative"
Tell that to the researchers at Tel Aviv University and Harvard University who did the study upon which all the DNA information in the video is based - the study was funded by the Israel Science Foundation. Here is the study: The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant, Cell, Volume 181, Issue 5, 28 May 2020, Pages 1146-1157 You are welcome to share any facts or research or anything that disproves wrong anything said in the video.
With all those questions about how where the name "Palestine" came from, does anyone care to consider that, in Arabic, "Palestine" is "Falasteen"... "Phillistine", perhaps? To say it never existed till the 19th or 20th centuries is pretty weird!
Where you find that the Arabs say palestina before 1920. Never. The Arabs palestinian called themselves only Arabs until 1920 ,they saw themselves as syrian Arabs. They called the area southern syria and in January 1919 in the peace conference in Paris they want big Arab state called greater syria. Only after they learned about the secret agreement called the sies picot agreement signed between britain and france that divided the area between them the Arabs understand that syria go to france they felt betrayed and started to develop new identity separate from the Syrians and the Jordanians.
@@ichigoshukutoBecause the coming of the European Askhenaz who were deported illegally in Palestine from Europe have raised divisons and political tensions. The Europeans in complicity with the UN forced for political reasons the local palestinian unhabitants to leave some of their lands to the newcomers. For generations Muslims, JEWS and christians have live together peacefully and harmoniously. The arrival of the Askhenaz destroyed the family links and collapsed the social structures of the communities.
I bet you did not reached High School... right? There is no palestinian people nur there is no palestine nation in the ancient jewish homeland. . Palestine It is the name given by the British empire to the ancient jewish homeland territory after the ottoman empire fall in 1918.
Aristotle, Herodotus and the Greeks were writing about the Palestinian people in 450 BC. Thats 2400 years before the 1960s. The DNA of the Palestinian Arabs matches the DNA discovered in Cannaanite sites that are 5,000 years old. It is virtually identical to the DNA profile of Lebanese, Palestinian and Syrian Jews. We have science and years of archeological finds now.
@History.Culture.projects-y5m No. He mentioned the land of plishtim , the same land mentioned in the Bible whose inhabitants disappeared a few hundred yrs after their arrival from Crete. The said land was a strip slightly biggervthan current Gaza strip, not where Judea/Samariabhave been forbthousands of years till today.
@@deavman The Greeks never mentioned the Philistines in their writings because the Philistines had disappeared before the Greeks were writing about Palestine. We know what the Greeks wrote. Palestine for them was the entire coastal Levant and had nothing to do with the Philistines. It's in writing in the historical record. The Romans, Arabs, and Ottoman Turks all used Palestine to describe the area. None of them were referring to the Philistines. They used the term in the same way it is understood today.
@@deavman That was the Egyptians and Hittites: There is an inscription dated to around 1150 BC at the Medinet Habu temple in Luxor which refers to the Peleset (land of the Philistines) - that was 600 years before the Greeks. The Greeks never mentioned the Philistines and were not as the Egyptians were referring to the Land of the Philistines when they used the word Palestine. The word has its root in the name for the Philistine's country but its meaning had lost any connection to the Philistines by the time of the Greek Classical period. A very common occurance in language called semantic shift. In the 5th century BC, the great Greek historian and geographer Herodotus of Halicarnassus2 (Ἡρόδoτoς Ἁλικαρνᾱσσεύς), known as the ‘Father of History’, mentions in his Historiae (Ἱστoρίαι, ‘Investigations’), the name of ‘Palestine’ (Παλαιστίνη) up to eight times. one mention: "These Phoenicians formerly lived, as they themselves say, by the Red Sea, and after crossing from there, now they inhabit the coast of Syria; this part of Syria to Egypt is called Palestine." From Syria to Egypt is what the Egyptians called Canaan. The Greeks called it: ‘Palestine’ (Παλαιστίνη) Here is Aristotle writing about the Dead Sea: "If it is as some say, in Palestine there is such a lake that if you tie a man or beast and throw it, it floats and does not sink in water, which would attest to what was said. Because they say that this lake is so bitter and salty that no fish lives in it; and the clothes are cleaned, if they get wet and shaken." The Dead Sea was never in Philistine lands, neither was Syria. No Greek ever mentions the Philistines I have no idea where you are getting your infrmation from. We have the orginak Greek texts
@@History.Culture.projects-y5m they wouldn't call it Palestine because at the time it was called Judea. You remind me of the Germans who called themselves Aryans while they have nothing to do with the true Aryans who were from India, slight brown skinned people, far from the blue eyed Ubermensch they picture themselves to be. They even organised expeditions in Tibet to find traces of their pseudo origin. Extreme ideologies are fond of mythical origins, that they try to dress up in a pseudo scientific context. Another attempt to falsify history.
You aré shortcoming, Phalestine, were justo the shore área south phenician área. Nothing about, when César ask to jews, who were yours most hated enemys? They answered The Philistines. So, César named Philistine to all Judea and Samaria
@@mylesfranco3545 SOme of the images where generated with AI. The data is all from the reference material. The genome of Ashkenazi Jews is from the study done by Tel Aviv University together with Harvard University and published in Cell journal: The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant, Cell, Volume 181, Issue 5, 28 May 2020, Pages 1146-1157
Dna studies has proven that modern day palestinian are direct descendant of israelite.. how could they are not indigenous to the land? 1. An article published by national geographic 2020 about a study on dna of ancient cananites tombs show that the ancient dna still alive in modern modern palestinian. So the contemporary zionist slogan tt was used to justify the killing and dehumanized palestinian as savage arabian from arab peninsula were just an evil liar concocted by zionist.. as what other lies they made. 2. The study titled “ The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant” by Cell. The study Excluded Askenazi and Ethiopian jewish from a control group because of more than 40% ancient european dna in Askenazi while more than 80% west african dna in Ethiopian. No research even by zionist could ever manipulated of fact tt dna of askenazi show of ancient european origin. Palestinian were the descendant of the ancient hebrew. Not jewish settler from ukraine or poland. The thousand years of jewish hebrew history on the land got nothing to do with settlers from europe. What are the evidences of settler from europes are the descendant of israelite? Artefacts? Historical facts? Dna? We dont have any historical fact of arrival of israelite in ukraine.. none By the way.. the cananites has been living on the land thousands years before emergence of a tribe called israelite. 3. A study on geographical dna of askenazi jews by eran elhaik 2017 show that they were the people of from slav, turkic, irano. Not palestine. The study using the Geographical Population Structure (GPS), which localizes genomes to where they experienced the last major admixture event. Nothing semitic about askenazi. They were just impostor 4. Mass arrival of juice settler also consist of russian recent convert of sobutnik. The sobutnik tt settled around galillee become the staunch supporter of zionist and the main force of ethnic cleansing machine 5. European jews speak yiddish. While russsian speak russian. They dont speak hebrew. Yiddish originated from area of ancient trade route of irano-turkic-slav. There were no evidence to show tt Ithe askenazi were expelled by roman move from italy all the way crossing the alps into germany, poland , and ukraine. Their language surely influenced by italian. The truth was that they were the people that originated along iran, turk, and slav route. 6. Based on all those points above. I could conclude tt israel zionist were just bunch evil impostor. Their country were created based on lies , created based on on genocide, ethnic cleansing, occupation and oppression on palestinian for more than 75 years
Jews trace their ancestary to the Levant. Just face the fact. If a culture behaves like it is indigenous to a certain plot of land for 3000 years. Then it probably is.
You might want to watch the section on how the Palestinians became Arabs. The Berbers of Northwest Africa, Egyptians, Palestinian and Lebanese Arabs are not Arabs from the Arabian peninsula. They adopted Arabic and an Arab identity after the Arab conquests. That is why Palestinians DNA is a dead match for the Bronze Age Canaanites.
@@History.Culture.projects-y5m Exactly, we've been Arabized and don't even share much with the Arabs of the Arabian Peninsula beyond the language. Our dialect is also very different from theirs and retains traces of our past, such as Phoenician, Ottoman, and other influence.
Arabs are an ethnolinguistic group of people. We're considered Arabs simply because we speak Arabic, although our dialect is very different and influenced by our historical heritage.
Thats easy. The same way Italians, Germans and Poles became Americans. They learned English and adopted an American identity. The same way the Normans, Saxons and Angles became English. Before the Arabs and Romans conquered the Levant the Greeks did. Many people became hellenized adopting Koine Greek as their native language. Its no surprise that after 1,000 years of successful rule that Arab and Islam were adopted by most of the population.
@@tombuddy100 The other way around? The Arabization of the peoples of the Arab empire is well documented. It was not only Muslims and Christians, - Jews were Arabized as well. For a 1,000 years Arab Jewish communities lived in Arab speaking countries. The term Mizrahi Jew is a 20th century invention.
Well, according to dna. 20+ dna tests of Palestinians they are canaanites and the ancestors of the ancient israelites 85% are. Very localized dna to that specific piece of land. Most israelis simply aren't genetically tied to the land whether they like it or not. It's a religious belief I get it. I think 🤔 it doesn't justify violence and the land should be shared.
@@arielg.2681do jew from europe speak and judean speak the same language? Or after they decide to become impostor and adopt new language hebrew+yiddish Lol Today hebrew after heavily influenced by yiddish has become different language than what ancient judean speak
@@baikorg Yes, the modern Hebrew accent is different from the ancient one. You can notice it by the difference in Mizrahi and Ashkenazi dialects in Israel. However, the written Hebrew language has stayed consistent with its ancient counterpart found in the Torah scrolls and artifacts. Yes, many modern Hebrew revivalists added new terms to make the language adapted to modern times. But its ancient written form makes up almost all of modern Hebrew.
Modern Hebrew isn't a mixture of ancient Hebrew and Yeddish. It's a version of ancient Hebrew with extra vocabulary added from a mixture of different languages or that is completely made up. The Yiddish contribution simply lies in the spoken accent.
@@baikorg obviously the language would be influenced by the region that its spoken in. that doesn't contradict the obvious liniage and connection between modern Ashkenazi jews and ancient judeans, who were also jews.
This left out all the juicy, hardcore stuff - and it was actually quite refreshing. An historical outline that tries very had to not make either side look bad.
6:00
If you are going to use the term Palestine from now on to decribe the entire area. Then how come the Romans used the term Judea to decscribe it prior to the Bar-Kochva revolt of 162AC?
they didn't it was Palestine then as it is now.
Government letters of the Roman empire from that time say otherwise.
@@arielg.2681 the Greek letters before the Romans clles it Palestine. Get over it.
@@arielg.2681 Judea referred to a smaller territory centered on the former Jewish Kingdom of Judah and the Hasmonean Kingdom (which was created in the Maccabean revolt in the territory of Judah and conquered by Pompey). Palestine referred to a larger area from Syria to Egypt. This nomenclature was established by the Greeks centuries before the Romans. Judea is the hellenized version of the name Judah and Palestine was used by the Greeks to describe the entire coastal Levant.
Great work, and very insighful!
What we need to remember is that there was not a Palestine under the Ottomans. This identity was decided on by colonialists. We have the descendants of Jews who converted and some Jews who had never converted or gone abroad and returnees from the diaspora. The contention of the Palestinians that they are a people is a very modern construct
One of the earliest known figures to self-identify as a Palestinian in written records is al-Muqaddasi, born in Jerusalem around 946 CE. A Palestinian Arab scholar, al-Muqaddasi was a pioneer in systematic geography.
In Ottoman maps the region was named Palestine. It was not an administrative district but a geographic area for the Ottomans.
The Filistin Risalesi which translates in English to the Palestinian Treatise, was a military manual published in 1915 for officers of the Ottoman 8th Army Corps.
see more here:
ruclips.net/video/ICaIkwEK35A/видео.html
the amount of disinformation in this one video,is way too high
what part?
This was very well-explained and very correct. Thank you. Please release more videos
Thank you, I will
Very well researched, was surprised at the academic rigor of this video. The narrative presented here is unpopular among Jews and Palestinians, but nevertheless accurate.
You know the content creator and he asked you to balance the rightfully hostile comments.
I won't insult you by thinking that you believe this piece of...
@@Iditsl hostile remarks that can't cite one fact to challenge anything in the video. I'm sorry that the science and the history doesn't affirm your political agenda. Science has no political bias. DNA doesnt care what you would like to believe is true. and I have no idea who khoas7044 is.
@History.Culture.projects-y5m it is preposterous from a pseudo historian to pretend that history and archaeology that are taught in universities (i.e. mainstream academic consensus) have political agendas.
The facts are undisputed, because they are validated by ancient text and archeological discoveries but their interpretation can vary according to the authors.
Your version is fantasy, and obviously delivers a political agenda: Palestine is forever.
I am not going to pick each lie, half truth and approximation you utter.
"Frequently, people who engage in pseudoarchaeology have a very strict interpretation of evidence and are unwilling to alter their stance, resulting in interpretations that often appear overly simplistic and fail to capture the complexity and nuance of the complete narrative"
Genesis 12: 3 you have been warned
Either u want to re write history which is called Historic revisionism or you are just ill read.
Tell that to the researchers at Tel Aviv University and Harvard University who did the study upon which all the DNA information in the video is based - the study was funded by the Israel Science Foundation. Here is the study: The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant, Cell, Volume 181, Issue 5, 28 May 2020, Pages 1146-1157
You are welcome to share any facts or research or anything that disproves wrong anything said in the video.
With all those questions about how where the name "Palestine" came from, does anyone care to consider that, in Arabic, "Palestine" is "Falasteen"... "Phillistine", perhaps? To say it never existed till the 19th or 20th centuries is pretty weird!
Where you find that the Arabs say palestina before 1920. Never. The Arabs palestinian called themselves only Arabs until 1920 ,they saw themselves as syrian Arabs. They called the area southern syria and in January 1919 in the peace conference in Paris they want big Arab state called greater syria. Only after they learned about the secret agreement called the sies picot agreement signed between britain and france that divided the area between them the Arabs understand that syria go to france they felt betrayed and started to develop new identity separate from the Syrians and the Jordanians.
You did such a great job!
All that history and no palestinian leader, no palestinian state.
I wonder why
@@ichigoshukutoBecause the coming of the European Askhenaz who were deported illegally in Palestine from Europe have raised divisons and political tensions.
The Europeans in complicity with the UN forced for political reasons the local palestinian unhabitants to leave some of their lands to the newcomers.
For generations Muslims, JEWS and christians have live together peacefully and harmoniously.
The arrival of the Askhenaz destroyed the family links and collapsed the social structures of the communities.
@@khalilndiaye-vs4bq I was making a sarcastic comment. ;P
I bet you did not reached High School... right?
There is no palestinian people nur there is no palestine nation in the ancient jewish homeland. .
Palestine It is the name given by the British empire to the ancient jewish homeland territory after the ottoman empire fall in 1918.
Lots of misinformation here
i hate the amount of mental gymnastics you make in order to steal a country
You got it backwards. Local Arabs "suddenly" became the Palestinian People in late '60's. Propaganda is rife here..
Aristotle, Herodotus and the Greeks were writing about the Palestinian people in 450 BC. Thats 2400 years before the 1960s. The DNA of the Palestinian Arabs matches the DNA discovered in Cannaanite sites that are 5,000 years old. It is virtually identical to the DNA profile of Lebanese, Palestinian and Syrian Jews. We have science and years of archeological finds now.
@History.Culture.projects-y5m No. He mentioned the land of plishtim , the same land mentioned in the Bible whose inhabitants disappeared a few hundred yrs after their arrival from Crete. The said land was a strip slightly biggervthan current Gaza strip, not where Judea/Samariabhave been forbthousands of years till today.
@@deavman The Greeks never mentioned the Philistines in their writings because the Philistines had disappeared before the Greeks were writing about Palestine. We know what the Greeks wrote. Palestine for them was the entire coastal Levant and had nothing to do with the Philistines. It's in writing in the historical record. The Romans, Arabs, and Ottoman Turks all used Palestine to describe the area. None of them were referring to the Philistines. They used the term in the same way it is understood today.
@@deavman That was the Egyptians and Hittites: There is an inscription dated to around 1150 BC at the Medinet Habu temple in Luxor which refers to the Peleset (land of the Philistines) - that was 600 years before the Greeks. The Greeks never mentioned the Philistines and were not as the Egyptians were referring to the Land of the Philistines when they used the word Palestine. The word has its root in the name for the Philistine's country but its meaning had lost any connection to the Philistines by the time of the Greek Classical period. A very common occurance in language called semantic shift.
In the 5th century BC, the great Greek historian and geographer Herodotus of Halicarnassus2 (Ἡρόδoτoς Ἁλικαρνᾱσσεύς), known as the ‘Father of History’, mentions in his Historiae (Ἱστoρίαι, ‘Investigations’), the name of ‘Palestine’ (Παλαιστίνη) up to eight times.
one mention:
"These Phoenicians formerly lived, as they themselves say, by the Red Sea, and after crossing from there, now they inhabit the coast of Syria; this part of Syria to Egypt is called Palestine."
From Syria to Egypt is what the Egyptians called Canaan. The Greeks called it: ‘Palestine’ (Παλαιστίνη)
Here is Aristotle writing about the Dead Sea:
"If it is as some say, in Palestine there is such a lake that if you tie a man or beast and throw it, it floats and does not sink in water, which would attest to what was said. Because they say that this lake is so bitter and salty that no fish lives in it; and the clothes are cleaned, if they get wet and shaken."
The Dead Sea was never in Philistine lands, neither was Syria. No Greek ever mentions the Philistines I have no idea where you are getting your infrmation from. We have the orginak Greek texts
@@History.Culture.projects-y5m they wouldn't call it Palestine because at the time it was called Judea. You remind me of the Germans who called themselves Aryans while they have nothing to do with the true Aryans who were from India, slight brown skinned people, far from the blue eyed Ubermensch they picture themselves to be. They even organised expeditions in Tibet to find traces of their pseudo origin.
Extreme ideologies are fond of mythical origins, that they try to dress up in a pseudo scientific context.
Another attempt to falsify history.
You aré shortcoming, Phalestine, were justo the shore área south phenician área. Nothing about, when César ask to jews, who were yours most hated enemys? They answered The Philistines. So, César named Philistine to all Judea and Samaria
I think there's some disinformation about the Ashkenazi here.
The description says its an AI Video, so that makes sense.
@@mylesfranco3545 SOme of the images where generated with AI. The data is all from the reference material. The genome of Ashkenazi Jews is from the study done by Tel Aviv University together with Harvard University and published in Cell journal: The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant, Cell, Volume 181, Issue 5, 28 May 2020, Pages 1146-1157
Dna studies has proven that modern day palestinian are direct descendant of israelite.. how could they are not indigenous to the land?
1. An article published by national geographic 2020 about a study on dna of ancient cananites tombs show that the ancient dna still alive in modern modern palestinian. So the contemporary zionist slogan tt was used to justify the killing and dehumanized palestinian as savage arabian from arab peninsula were just an evil liar concocted by zionist.. as what other lies they made.
2. The study titled “ The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant” by Cell. The study
Excluded Askenazi and Ethiopian jewish from a control group because of more than 40% ancient european dna in Askenazi while more than 80% west african dna in Ethiopian.
No research even by zionist could ever manipulated of fact tt dna of askenazi show of ancient european origin.
Palestinian were the descendant of the ancient hebrew. Not jewish settler from ukraine or poland. The thousand years of jewish hebrew history on the land got nothing to do with settlers from europe. What are the evidences of settler from europes are the descendant of israelite? Artefacts? Historical facts? Dna? We dont have any historical fact of arrival of israelite in ukraine.. none
By the way.. the cananites has been living on the land thousands years before emergence of a tribe called israelite.
3. A study on geographical dna of askenazi jews by eran elhaik 2017 show that they were the people of from slav, turkic, irano. Not palestine. The study using the Geographical Population Structure (GPS), which localizes genomes to where they experienced the last major admixture event. Nothing semitic about askenazi. They were just impostor
4. Mass arrival of juice settler also consist of russian recent convert of sobutnik. The sobutnik tt settled around galillee become the staunch supporter of zionist and the main force of ethnic cleansing machine
5. European jews speak yiddish. While russsian speak russian. They dont speak hebrew. Yiddish originated from area of ancient trade route of irano-turkic-slav. There were no evidence to show tt Ithe askenazi were expelled by roman move from italy all the way crossing the alps into germany, poland , and ukraine. Their language surely influenced by italian. The truth was that they were the people that originated along iran, turk, and slav route.
6. Based on all those points above. I could conclude tt israel zionist were just bunch evil impostor. Their country were created based on lies , created based on on genocide, ethnic cleansing, occupation and oppression on palestinian for more than 75 years
Jews trace their ancestary to the Levant. Just face the fact.
If a culture behaves like it is indigenous to a certain plot of land for 3000 years. Then it probably is.
what disinformation?
Arabs didn't come from Canaan. They came from the Arabian Peninsula, hence the word Arab. Also, it didn't happen until the seventh century AD.
You might want to watch the section on how the Palestinians became Arabs. The Berbers of Northwest Africa, Egyptians, Palestinian and Lebanese Arabs are not Arabs from the Arabian peninsula. They adopted Arabic and an Arab identity after the Arab conquests. That is why Palestinians DNA is a dead match for the Bronze Age Canaanites.
@@History.Culture.projects-y5m I don't think he even watched the video smh
Jane the stubborn ignorant
@@History.Culture.projects-y5m Exactly, we've been Arabized and don't even share much with the Arabs of the Arabian Peninsula beyond the language. Our dialect is also very different from theirs and retains traces of our past, such as Phoenician, Ottoman, and other influence.
Arabs are an ethnolinguistic group of people. We're considered Arabs simply because we speak Arabic, although our dialect is very different and influenced by our historical heritage.
This video is so wrong all wrong. Itis a load of Rubbish.
May be your English is better than rubbish.
Right from your start u error..how can Palestians.bcome Arabs...
Thats easy. The same way Italians, Germans and Poles became Americans. They learned English and adopted an American identity. The same way the Normans, Saxons and Angles became English. Before the Arabs and Romans conquered the Levant the Greeks did. Many people became hellenized adopting Koine Greek as their native language. Its no surprise that after 1,000 years of successful rule that Arab and Islam were adopted by most of the population.
or, the other way around in the 20th century
@@tombuddy100 The other way around? The Arabization of the peoples of the Arab empire is well documented. It was not only Muslims and Christians, - Jews were Arabized as well. For a 1,000 years Arab Jewish communities lived in Arab speaking countries. The term Mizrahi Jew is a 20th century invention.
Well, according to dna. 20+ dna tests of Palestinians they are canaanites and the ancestors of the ancient israelites 85% are. Very localized dna to that specific piece of land. Most israelis simply aren't genetically tied to the land whether they like it or not. It's a religious belief I get it. I think 🤔 it doesn't justify violence and the land should be shared.
NOT Jews.
JUDEANS.
The Judeans were Cananites.
But the Jews of today and the Judeans of back then have almost identical languages.
The term Jew originates from Judea for a reason.
@@arielg.2681do jew from europe speak and judean speak the same language? Or after they decide to become impostor and adopt new language hebrew+yiddish
Lol
Today hebrew after heavily influenced by yiddish has become different language than what ancient judean speak
@@baikorg Yes, the modern Hebrew accent is different from the ancient one. You can notice it by the difference in Mizrahi and Ashkenazi dialects in Israel.
However, the written Hebrew language has stayed consistent with its ancient counterpart found in the Torah scrolls and artifacts. Yes, many modern Hebrew revivalists added new terms to make the language adapted to modern times. But its ancient written form makes up almost all of modern Hebrew.
Modern Hebrew isn't a mixture of ancient Hebrew and Yeddish.
It's a version of ancient Hebrew with extra vocabulary added from a mixture of different languages or that is completely made up.
The Yiddish contribution simply lies in the spoken accent.
@@baikorg obviously the language would be influenced by the region that its spoken in. that doesn't contradict the obvious liniage and connection between modern Ashkenazi jews and ancient judeans, who were also jews.
THIS IS THE TYPICAL LIAR DISINFORMATION VIDEO.