Very well researched, was surprised at the academic rigor of this video. The narrative presented here is unpopular among Jews and Palestinians, but nevertheless accurate.
Aristotle, Herodotus and the Greeks were writing about the Palestinian people in 450 BC. Thats 2400 years before the 1960s. The DNA of the Palestinian Arabs matches the DNA discovered in Cannaanite sites that are 5,000 years old. It is virtually identical to the DNA profile of Lebanese, Palestinian and Syrian Jews. We have science and years of archeological finds now.
@History.Culture.projects-y5m No. He mentioned the land of plishtim , the same land mentioned in the Bible whose inhabitants disappeared a few hundred yrs after their arrival from Crete. The said land was a strip slightly biggervthan current Gaza strip, not where Judea/Samariabhave been forbthousands of years till today.
@@deavman The Greeks never mentioned the Philistines in their writings because the Philistines had disappeared before the Greeks were writing about Palestine. We know what the Greeks wrote. Palestine for them was the entire coastal Levant and had nothing to do with the Philistines. It's in writing in the historical record. The Romans, Arabs, and Ottoman Turks all used Palestine to describe the area. None of them were referring to the Philistines. They used the term in the same way it is understood today.
@@deavman That was the Egyptians and Hittites: There is an inscription dated to around 1150 BC at the Medinet Habu temple in Luxor which refers to the Peleset (land of the Philistines) - that was 600 years before the Greeks. The Greeks never mentioned the Philistines and were not as the Egyptians were referring to the Land of the Philistines when they used the word Palestine. The word has its root in the name for the Philistine's country but its meaning had lost any connection to the Philistines by the time of the Greek Classical period. A very common occurance in language called semantic shift. In the 5th century BC, the great Greek historian and geographer Herodotus of Halicarnassus2 (Ἡρόδoτoς Ἁλικαρνᾱσσεύς), known as the ‘Father of History’, mentions in his Historiae (Ἱστoρίαι, ‘Investigations’), the name of ‘Palestine’ (Παλαιστίνη) up to eight times. one mention: "These Phoenicians formerly lived, as they themselves say, by the Red Sea, and after crossing from there, now they inhabit the coast of Syria; this part of Syria to Egypt is called Palestine." From Syria to Egypt is what the Egyptians called Canaan. The Greeks called it: ‘Palestine’ (Παλαιστίνη) Here is Aristotle writing about the Dead Sea: "If it is as some say, in Palestine there is such a lake that if you tie a man or beast and throw it, it floats and does not sink in water, which would attest to what was said. Because they say that this lake is so bitter and salty that no fish lives in it; and the clothes are cleaned, if they get wet and shaken." The Dead Sea was never in Philistine lands, neither was Syria. No Greek ever mentions the Philistines I have no idea where you are getting your infrmation from. We have the orginak Greek texts
6:00 If you are going to use the term Palestine from now on to decribe the entire area. Then how come the Romans used the term Judea to decscribe it prior to the Bar-Kochva revolt of 162AC?
@@mylesfranco3545 SOme of the images where generated with AI. The data is all from the reference material. The genome of Ashkenazi Jews is from the study done by Tel Aviv University together with Harvard University and published in Cell journal: The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant, Cell, Volume 181, Issue 5, 28 May 2020, Pages 1146-1157
Dna studies has proven that modern day palestinian are direct descendant of israelite.. how could they are not indigenous to the land? 1. An article published by national geographic 2020 about a study on dna of ancient cananites tombs show that the ancient dna still alive in modern modern palestinian. So the contemporary zionist slogan tt was used to justify the killing and dehumanized palestinian as savage arabian from arab peninsula were just an evil liar concocted by zionist.. as what other lies they made. 2. The study titled “ The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant” by Cell. The study Excluded Askenazi and Ethiopian jewish from a control group because of more than 40% ancient european dna in Askenazi while more than 80% west african dna in Ethiopian. No research even by zionist could ever manipulated of fact tt dna of askenazi show of ancient european origin. Palestinian were the descendant of the ancient hebrew. Not jewish settler from ukraine or poland. The thousand years of jewish hebrew history on the land got nothing to do with settlers from europe. What are the evidences of settler from europes are the descendant of israelite? Artefacts? Historical facts? Dna? We dont have any historical fact of arrival of israelite in ukraine.. none By the way.. the cananites has been living on the land thousands years before emergence of a tribe called israelite. 3. A study on geographical dna of askenazi jews by eran elhaik 2017 show that they were the people of from slav, turkic, irano. Not palestine. The study using the Geographical Population Structure (GPS), which localizes genomes to where they experienced the last major admixture event. Nothing semitic about askenazi. They were just impostor 4. Mass arrival of juice settler also consist of russian recent convert of sobutnik. The sobutnik tt settled around galillee become the staunch supporter of zionist and the main force of ethnic cleansing machine 5. European jews speak yiddish. While russsian speak russian. They dont speak hebrew. Yiddish originated from area of ancient trade route of irano-turkic-slav. There were no evidence to show tt Ithe askenazi were expelled by roman move from italy all the way crossing the alps into germany, poland , and ukraine. Their language surely influenced by italian. The truth was that they were the people that originated along iran, turk, and slav route. 6. Based on all those points above. I could conclude tt israel zionist were just bunch evil impostor. Their country were created based on lies , created based on on genocide, ethnic cleansing, occupation and oppression on palestinian for more than 75 years
Jews trace their ancestary to the Levant. Just face the fact. If a culture behaves like it is indigenous to a certain plot of land for 3000 years. Then it probably is.
@@arielg.2681do jew from europe speak and judean speak the same language? Or after they decide to become impostor and adopt new language hebrew+yiddish Lol Today hebrew after heavily influenced by yiddish has become different language than what ancient judean speak
@@baikorg Yes, the modern Hebrew accent is different from the ancient one. You can notice it by the difference in Mizrahi and Ashkenazi dialects in Israel. However, the written Hebrew language has stayed consistent with its ancient counterpart found in the Torah scrolls and artifacts. Yes, many modern Hebrew revivalists added new terms to make the language adapted to modern times. But its ancient written form makes up almost all of modern Hebrew.
Modern Hebrew isn't a mixture of ancient Hebrew and Yeddish. It's a version of ancient Hebrew with extra vocabulary added from a mixture of different languages or that is completely made up. The Yiddish contribution simply lies in the spoken accent.
@@baikorg obviously the language would be influenced by the region that its spoken in. that doesn't contradict the obvious liniage and connection between modern Ashkenazi jews and ancient judeans, who were also jews.
You might want to watch the section on how the Palestinians became Arabs. The Berbers of Northwest Africa, Egyptians, Palestinian and Lebanese Arabs are not Arabs from the Arabian peninsula. They adopted Arabic and an Arab identity after the Arab conquests. That is why Palestinians DNA is a dead match for the Bronze Age Canaanites.
@@History.Culture.projects-y5m Exactly, we've been Arabized and don't even share much with the Arabs of the Arabian Peninsula beyond the language. Our dialect is also very different from theirs and retains traces of our past, such as Phoenician, Ottoman, and other influence.
Arabs are an ethnolinguistic group of people. We're considered Arabs simply because we speak Arabic, although our dialect is very different and influenced by our historical heritage.
![[DRAGON BALL LEGENDS REVEALS ＆ STUFF] LEGENDS FESTIVAL 2024 Special Edition Part 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mV5bGIswTtQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Very well researched, was surprised at the academic rigor of this video. The narrative presented here is unpopular among Jews and Palestinians, but nevertheless accurate.
You got it backwards. Local Arabs "suddenly" became the Palestinian People in late '60's. Propaganda is rife here..
Aristotle, Herodotus and the Greeks were writing about the Palestinian people in 450 BC. Thats 2400 years before the 1960s. The DNA of the Palestinian Arabs matches the DNA discovered in Cannaanite sites that are 5,000 years old. It is virtually identical to the DNA profile of Lebanese, Palestinian and Syrian Jews. We have science and years of archeological finds now.
@History.Culture.projects-y5m No. He mentioned the land of plishtim , the same land mentioned in the Bible whose inhabitants disappeared a few hundred yrs after their arrival from Crete. The said land was a strip slightly biggervthan current Gaza strip, not where Judea/Samariabhave been forbthousands of years till today.
@@deavman The Greeks never mentioned the Philistines in their writings because the Philistines had disappeared before the Greeks were writing about Palestine. We know what the Greeks wrote. Palestine for them was the entire coastal Levant and had nothing to do with the Philistines. It's in writing in the historical record. The Romans, Arabs, and Ottoman Turks all used Palestine to describe the area. None of them were referring to the Philistines. They used the term in the same way it is understood today.
@@deavman That was the Egyptians and Hittites: There is an inscription dated to around 1150 BC at the Medinet Habu temple in Luxor which refers to the Peleset (land of the Philistines) - that was 600 years before the Greeks. The Greeks never mentioned the Philistines and were not as the Egyptians were referring to the Land of the Philistines when they used the word Palestine. The word has its root in the name for the Philistine's country but its meaning had lost any connection to the Philistines by the time of the Greek Classical period. A very common occurance in language called semantic shift.
In the 5th century BC, the great Greek historian and geographer Herodotus of Halicarnassus2 (Ἡρόδoτoς Ἁλικαρνᾱσσεύς), known as the ‘Father of History’, mentions in his Historiae (Ἱστoρίαι, ‘Investigations’), the name of ‘Palestine’ (Παλαιστίνη) up to eight times.
one mention:
"These Phoenicians formerly lived, as they themselves say, by the Red Sea, and after crossing from there, now they inhabit the coast of Syria; this part of Syria to Egypt is called Palestine."
From Syria to Egypt is what the Egyptians called Canaan. The Greeks called it: ‘Palestine’ (Παλαιστίνη)
Here is Aristotle writing about the Dead Sea:
"If it is as some say, in Palestine there is such a lake that if you tie a man or beast and throw it, it floats and does not sink in water, which would attest to what was said. Because they say that this lake is so bitter and salty that no fish lives in it; and the clothes are cleaned, if they get wet and shaken."
The Dead Sea was never in Philistine lands, neither was Syria. No Greek ever mentions the Philistines I have no idea where you are getting your infrmation from. We have the orginak Greek texts
the amount of disinformation in this one video,is way too high
what part?
All that history and no palestinian leader, no palestinian state.
I wonder why
6:00
If you are going to use the term Palestine from now on to decribe the entire area. Then how come the Romans used the term Judea to decscribe it prior to the Bar-Kochva revolt of 162AC?
they didn't it was Palestine then as it is now.
Government letters of the Roman empire from that time say otherwise.
This video is so wrong all wrong. Itis a load of Rubbish.
I think there's some disinformation about the Ashkenazi here.
The description says its an AI Video, so that makes sense.
@@mylesfranco3545 SOme of the images where generated with AI. The data is all from the reference material. The genome of Ashkenazi Jews is from the study done by Tel Aviv University together with Harvard University and published in Cell journal: The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant, Cell, Volume 181, Issue 5, 28 May 2020, Pages 1146-1157
Dna studies has proven that modern day palestinian are direct descendant of israelite.. how could they are not indigenous to the land?
1. An article published by national geographic 2020 about a study on dna of ancient cananites tombs show that the ancient dna still alive in modern modern palestinian. So the contemporary zionist slogan tt was used to justify the killing and dehumanized palestinian as savage arabian from arab peninsula were just an evil liar concocted by zionist.. as what other lies they made.
2. The study titled “ The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant” by Cell. The study
Excluded Askenazi and Ethiopian jewish from a control group because of more than 40% ancient european dna in Askenazi while more than 80% west african dna in Ethiopian.
No research even by zionist could ever manipulated of fact tt dna of askenazi show of ancient european origin.
Palestinian were the descendant of the ancient hebrew. Not jewish settler from ukraine or poland. The thousand years of jewish hebrew history on the land got nothing to do with settlers from europe. What are the evidences of settler from europes are the descendant of israelite? Artefacts? Historical facts? Dna? We dont have any historical fact of arrival of israelite in ukraine.. none
By the way.. the cananites has been living on the land thousands years before emergence of a tribe called israelite.
3. A study on geographical dna of askenazi jews by eran elhaik 2017 show that they were the people of from slav, turkic, irano. Not palestine. The study using the Geographical Population Structure (GPS), which localizes genomes to where they experienced the last major admixture event. Nothing semitic about askenazi. They were just impostor
4. Mass arrival of juice settler also consist of russian recent convert of sobutnik. The sobutnik tt settled around galillee become the staunch supporter of zionist and the main force of ethnic cleansing machine
5. European jews speak yiddish. While russsian speak russian. They dont speak hebrew. Yiddish originated from area of ancient trade route of irano-turkic-slav. There were no evidence to show tt Ithe askenazi were expelled by roman move from italy all the way crossing the alps into germany, poland , and ukraine. Their language surely influenced by italian. The truth was that they were the people that originated along iran, turk, and slav route.
6. Based on all those points above. I could conclude tt israel zionist were just bunch evil impostor. Their country were created based on lies , created based on on genocide, ethnic cleansing, occupation and oppression on palestinian for more than 75 years
Jews trace their ancestary to the Levant. Just face the fact.
If a culture behaves like it is indigenous to a certain plot of land for 3000 years. Then it probably is.
what disinformation?
NOT Jews.
JUDEANS.
The Judeans were Cananites.
But the Jews of today and the Judeans of back then have almost identical languages.
The term Jew originates from Judea for a reason.
@@arielg.2681do jew from europe speak and judean speak the same language? Or after they decide to become impostor and adopt new language hebrew+yiddish
Lol
Today hebrew after heavily influenced by yiddish has become different language than what ancient judean speak
@@baikorg Yes, the modern Hebrew accent is different from the ancient one. You can notice it by the difference in Mizrahi and Ashkenazi dialects in Israel.
However, the written Hebrew language has stayed consistent with its ancient counterpart found in the Torah scrolls and artifacts. Yes, many modern Hebrew revivalists added new terms to make the language adapted to modern times. But its ancient written form makes up almost all of modern Hebrew.
Modern Hebrew isn't a mixture of ancient Hebrew and Yeddish.
It's a version of ancient Hebrew with extra vocabulary added from a mixture of different languages or that is completely made up.
The Yiddish contribution simply lies in the spoken accent.
@@baikorg obviously the language would be influenced by the region that its spoken in. that doesn't contradict the obvious liniage and connection between modern Ashkenazi jews and ancient judeans, who were also jews.
Arabs didn't come from Canaan. They came from the Arabian Peninsula, hence the word Arab. Also, it didn't happen until the seventh century AD.
You might want to watch the section on how the Palestinians became Arabs. The Berbers of Northwest Africa, Egyptians, Palestinian and Lebanese Arabs are not Arabs from the Arabian peninsula. They adopted Arabic and an Arab identity after the Arab conquests. That is why Palestinians DNA is a dead match for the Bronze Age Canaanites.
@@History.Culture.projects-y5m I don't think he even watched the video smh
Jane the stubborn ignorant
@@History.Culture.projects-y5m Exactly, we've been Arabized and don't even share much with the Arabs of the Arabian Peninsula beyond the language. Our dialect is also very different from theirs and retains traces of our past, such as Phoenician, Ottoman, and other influence.
Arabs are an ethnolinguistic group of people. We're considered Arabs simply because we speak Arabic, although our dialect is very different and influenced by our historical heritage.