“It’s the mistake EVERY business makes” Rory Sutherland
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- In today’s episode of Nudge, Rory Sutherland explains:
The reason behind Brexit, how doormen were undervalued, what bees teach us about creativity, the problem with R&D, and Amazon’s two way door
Don’t miss this.
Access the bonus episode here: nudge.ck.page/...
Rory’s book Alchemy: tinyurl.com/3uc...
Sign up to the Nudge Newsletter: www.nudgepodca...
@Rory Sutherland is one of the great communicators of our age and should basically be running the country...! I've been following Nudgestock since its inception - and the reason it's not as popular as it should be is because the modern world is driven by people seeking those that offer easy / quick answers (which in the vast majority of cases turn out to be either bullshit or very short-sighted). What Nudgestock is offering is questions - questions on how we should think, how we should collaborate and how we should approach the challenge of both business & community (once must not separate the two - conventional captialist economics has been doing that for the last 70 years and that's why we're all in the shit together)... and the majority of "business / social leaders" do not like questions... and nor does society in general.... because our entire education system is built on certainty and knowledge power structures... what Nudgestock is doing is challenging the fundamental basis of those. Keep up the great work team - challenge the status quo..!!
100% Rory for PM
I don't understand how the Nudge Podcast isn't more popular. I loved rory's ideas about this and I agree with him too many businesses lose sight on what creativity can provide. I am glad I watched this as I am going to apply these principles to my own business right now. Thank you for the information and the video much love love Nudge podcast
Because they censor, nobody likes that today, people start hearing beeps and the tune away, this podcast may think they are in 1950s America, too much heavy editing to overexplain and beeping on top of their guests' voices, that's very daft.
Rory for pm!!
I don't understand why this broadcast has been edited and has a voice over explanation. The only explanation needed is why there's an explanation.
Very very good as always. Having just 6.6k views is a sad reflection on where we’re at….linear & legacy habitual behaviours rule. So much benefit for so many people in videos like this
The asides in this video are an automatic door opener.
I totally agree that customer service has this robotic style of handling things in the UK. One thing I love about living in Italy (ok, and despise every now and then!) is that most of the time, things aren't black or white. It is the perstitence of the grey areas that help us get along. Even laws are ' open to interpretation'.
I with Rory would do business lunches in Australia!
Great clip of RS. I have no idea why someone added a voiceover to repeat him.
looks like someone is re-packaging someone else original podcast for the income stream hence the voice-over
Your podcast is just: great value/per time unit
Fantastic video. Thank you.
risk distribution is a fantastic idea
In the risk pooling example I would say against Rory’s view ( I’m just adding a question, by no means I say it’s right, just an observations) the time it takes both option also plays an important point. If you lose 30%, it’s because something went wrong and you almost lose if immediately. If it goes well and you’ll win, those gains won’t come from one day to another, it will take time. So sometimes you are not in a position to take a risk which could end losing everything in no time only for a 10% surplus
Rory was unlucky with the Swiss insurance. Last week I went online to order a Swiss passport. Took 5 mins including booking the next day visit to the passport office to do the biometrics. A week later I had a passport. That is not possible in the UK! I suppose that is a micro efficiency. Rory's experience was one of his macro inefficiencies.
I thought like you that UK passports would take a long time (in my case, because of what I heard in the media about massive backlogs), but, earlier this year, I ordered a replacement passport - took about 1h online, and I had to post my old passport, but the new passport was with me less than 2 weeks later... maybe I was lucky.
You should have left this episode off with a cliffhanger…
The pubs thing wouldn’t work, unless they sold sof drinks onlky🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Interesting as always Rory but no - we voted for leave bc we didnt want to be ruled by unelected beaureaucrats and we wanted decisions to be nationally considered.
Speak for yourself. I voted leave for the reasons he discussed. I think the upsides of the EU as it was at the time probably, just about, made up for the downsides. However, everything about how the EU had developed over years - and the way it reacts to any kind of negative feedback - meant I was pretty sure I wouldn't want to be part of it in the form it would be in 10-20 years. I still think that, long-term, we're better off out, I just wish the deranged hard-Brexit lot hadn't chucked the baby out with the bathwater based on only a 4% winning margin (especially when there wasn't even consensus amongst the 52% - me included - on what Brexit means... there definitely wasn't a mandate for a hard-Brexit).
To be fair to Rory, he says at 27:36 "the reason 5, 10, 15, 20 percent of people voted leave was on the precautionary principle..." - I agree with him that it is complex, and that you can''t say "all people voted leave because..." eg I voted leave for similar reasons to you: I believe devolution rather than centralisation leads to better decision making... but also Rory's point is valid in my case, in that I saw increased centralisation across the EU in future, and this was a once in a lifetime opportunity to stop the UK spiralling down into the EU's gravity well.
@@simonjgriffithshr I feel that Theresa May's original deal was a reasonable compromise, but it was rejected both by the hard-Brexiteers, and also by most Remainers (who were hoping to stall and force a second referendum)... if the Remainers had voted for Theresa May's deal, it would have got through (even with the hard-Brexiteers voting against) and it would have been a softer Brexit that probably reflected the overall view of the country - and more importantly, we wouldn't have had what felt like years of political deadlock.