@@PhilNickinsonnah theyre just forcing ppl to buy the more expensive one. They're already at peak economy of scale with the chromecast, it's not expensive for them
The Google TV Streamer has to be one of the worst follow-on products I have ever seen. There is essentially no advancement over the CCWGTV 4k and the new features are things that most people won't use e.g. "Thread" hub. For me, the Streamer is actually a step backwards, it does not allow deinterlacing of OTA broadcasts e.g. HDHomeRun.
I'm getting the Google Streamer because it has a USB-C port that I use to add a dongle for my keyboard, trackpad, and additional storage. I can sideload more usable apps with it. And the extra gig of RAM and plenty more storage will be a welcome and stable upgrade from my Chromecast dongle.
Hate to say it but this review was bad. Typically you guys kill it. Felt like the review was "hey, it does smart home stiff, neat!" How does it compare to apple tv, Nvidia or other big dogs?
@@JadenRoss-v3s Well... he is basically correct. Streaming robs you of picture and audio quality due to a lower bitrate being used. I did, as other pro's have done, performed a side by side with same content from both sources. You are definitely convinced once you see it. So, it is not an opinion, but a technical fact.
Have them on my Jellyfin/Plex. Also, many Blu-ray collections ruin the original intent and / or have modified the shows (Buffy HD for example). Basically, I torrent have to torrent all the correct versions anyway.
I purchased the Chromecast non-4K almost years ago when I went on sale. Should have purchased the 4K version, hopefully the TV Streamer will go on sale during Black Friday. And I'll use my old Chromecast on my bedroom tv. I agree I would trust Google more than ONN for timely updates.
Google Streamer. How does it handle TrueHD, not ATMOS, streaming from Plex? Can it pass through via HDMI? And I am talking about the TrueHD portion, NOT the lossy "Core" that is included. Does the ONN do pass through for TrueHD? I know ATMOS works but want to know if I should migrate from my CCWGTV to an ONN or the new Streamer.
No streaming app allows Dolby Tru HD or DTS HD Master Audio 5.1. Dolby Digital plus or Atmos is allowed. Those lossless codecs require more bandwith for streaming services. Only on Bluray discs you will get them. Atmos is not a standalone on bluray or 4k bluray discs. It is a spatial surround expansion of Dolby Tru HD.
Yeah, here in the UK it only comes in the gross cream colour. That match is nothing in my house if they want me to have it out on display they should probably have more options. Then again, I'm not buying it anyway. I got sick of giving money to Google for half baked products that stop working properly 6 months in.
Can you please compare it to the Nvidia Shield Tv Pro? I love my Shield, but it's wifi antennas are awful, and I strictly use it to stream YT, Netflix, and Stremio
Shield is old old old. No one really cares or wants to compare a device that came out in 2015, 2017 or 2019 depending on the model but they all mostly the same. I had but its lacking in so many things that I ended up selling it and buying the Dune HD Homatics R 4K plus. It does everything the Shield does and more since it has AV1 support. Android 12, HDR plus, Frame matching, All the Audio codecs etc etc etc
@@nitmare64people ask about the Shield because it is the mainstream gold standard. Most people with a Shield are happy with it, they are still have decent performance for the age, so they ask because they may want to know if it is worth finally upgrading. I have the Homatics with Core Elec and it's fantastic.
I've already saved up some credits to help buy the Google Streamer. Definitely going with that because it has a USB-C port that I use to add a dongle for my keyboard, trackpad, and additional storage. I can sideload more usable apps with it. And the extra gig of RAM and plenty more storage will be a welcome and stable upgrade from my Chromecast dongle.
The software support for these is a fair point - the Chromecast 4K/HD are getting 5 years, so the Streamer likely will also, but the Onn streamers will probably get closer to 3 years. I know the 2021 Onn box hasn't gotten an update since the summer and is likely EOL.
I guess, but they also said they'll continue to support it. I just bought the Chromecast 4K on saturday to update our old 2017 samsung tv in the bedroom and I love it. I have a newer Apple TV 4K in our media room on our big screen and honestly, the CC4K is just fine. I'd prefer another AppleTV but for a bedroom TV that just needed more speed the CC4K does what I need it to do. I wasn't about to spend another $150 on an AppleTV. The CC4K is still snappy, software is still good and I don't know why it would need to be faster or more updated when all most people do is click into an app. And most people should have it on App-only mode to reduce any network bandwidth it's using and to just get into their streaming app easier.
My Onn 4k Pro is a little jerky playing back my video from a 4TB flash drive plugged into the USB port. I usually publish MP4 at less than 100Mbps, in h264 or h265. I wonder if the hardware in the Google is more capable at decoding h264 or h265? What kind of bitrate can they support?
I have the Onn 4k pro, bought it because of all these reviews saying it doesn't lag. Well it LAGS, lags like crazy. It doesn't stutter like other devices, it just straight up goes crazy and becomes unusable sometimes. Scrolling through Netflix has a noticeable delay for when you press the button and the action occurs on the TV. It's very much a mid device, it worked great new but not sure what happened.
I was looking forward to this new Google TV streamer, but they completely killed any excitement I had when they left off a USB port so I could connect external storage. Unfortunate.
You forgot to mention that the new Google remote swapped the Home and Mic buttons. This can be inconvenient for people who are still using the older Chromecasts on other TVs in their home. FYI, the Onn 4K Pro isn't officially available here in Canada. Even Amazon's Canadian site doesn't offer an import option (the only option is for the original non-pro 4K). Even the dark grey version of the TV Streamer isn't available here. :(
Fellow Canadian here. I grabbed a few Onn 4K/4K Pro when I crossed the border last summer and it's really a great inexpensive device. I replaced my Chromecast w/ GTV 4k with the Onn 4k Pro since it's way snappier + backlit remote is great. I must also mention that the main difference between the Pro and Non-Pro versions are the integrated speaker (which is only used for Google Assistant to respond. You can't play music with it for example) and the backlit remote. Apart from that, both devices use the same hardware and have the same capabilities. The Non-Pro Onn 4k is already great if you don't need these extra features.
bought a pair of tivo 4k devices while we were still in the good ole us of a. real cheap, managed to kill ALL ads on homescreen (disabled a service in apps menu, it was that easy). even after the updates it stuck. pretty ok device, as snappy as our shield pro, highly recommended. never used tivo app integration, so cant say much about that. the only downside is that you cant run it off of tv usb port, needs a charger. i really loved our roku sticks since it ran off of tv usb, but lack of codec support made us switch to tivo 4k. im actually thinking getting 3-4 more and paying all the duties and taxes and shipping just to have a few more as backups. oh, never used it with hdr/dv material so i dunno if tivo 4k supports those at all…
Beside all the smart home functionalities, why would one use this over the native TV apps? Is it even worth it for just YT, Netflix? What advantages does it have over a new Tizen OS? How is the upscaling? Does it even upscale 1080p? Why do Google want me 100 bucks if I have native TV apps. So many questions...
I would use something out of the 'native tv apps' for than I don't need to sit all the advertisement in some apps that take full 8 minutes.. If I watch via the native tv app I can't switch to cable tv while the app is running in the background.. With a seperate device via hdmi... I can..
I have a Samsung S95D tv, got a couple of questions: - what's the advantage using this rather the Tizen OS - if I use this will it make use of the processor on the TV to improve image quality? - does the image quality of streaming services better/same/worse if using this rather than the apps from the tv? Thanks
Advantage is just more of quality of life update. Basically apart from the google integration and more apps support it’ll just be much more faster and optimised experience. There wouldn’t be much of a picture quality though.
I bought the ONN 4K pro when it came out and it's been nothing but trouble. I have 2 user profiles. one of them randomly stopped working. if you use another app and go to RUclips, it stutters. Only option is to reboot. I had no option but to abandon it and go back to the Chromecast.
There's nothing wrong with more choices and the Onn does the job and does it for half the price. Let's also not forget that there are millions of Chromecast devices and TVs running Chromecast so I'm pretty sure Google will have to update it. Currently, there are very few Google TV Streamer devices so if anything is getting updated it's probably Chromecast, not Streamer.
Ironically the google streamer is buggy, with audio sync issues, no Dolby Vision 7 profile support for file playback and no audio passthrough. The Onn has all the same limitions and specs for half the price. without sync audio issues.
Does the ONN support the full enhancement layer for Dolby Vision? Or does it fall back to I think profile 5 for DV support? I bought an Ugoos and slapped Core Elec on it to get full Dolby Vision support. FEL and profile 7 work great.
Google TV Streamer "Horrible Name, Really Horrible Device. I Fixed that for you Phil. Onn 4K pro is the best value for the buck! Hands down! and its more powerful than The Streamer. Never mind that the Onn pro has better audio codecs. The streamer only has matter going for it. Thats it.
Is anything going to come close to the Nvidia Shield? Or am I doomed to one day downgrade? Been getting ansy since it hasn't updated now in like 2 years.
I have Chromecast 4k and like where the volume buttons are. This new Google streamer is step back in that regard. Instad, they should have removed the mic button, this is really annoying and I'm never-ever going to use voice commands.
Seems like a good device, but I'm not sure I can justify $100 for it when the Onn device is only $50. So far Walmart has done a good job keeping up the software on the Onn devices. With that being said, I absolutely HATE the Google remote control. the Onn device has a much better remote. Feels better in the hand.
Thinking about getting this for my mom so she can watch all the movies I've purchased from Google tv. The movies I watch on my phone. Here's the question ❓ can this Google tv streamer work with a older TV to be able to stream Google tv to a older TV or do I have to buy a smart TV for this to work? Or can it interface through the RCA plugs in the back of a older TV? Thanks
Not all streaming apps work on Android 14. Britbox is one of those. So the Google TV Streamer was a downgrade from the ONN box, which I still use, while the Google TV Streamer is in a closet doing nothing. Probably will never use.
@@russelldye5506 The Chromecast with Google TV allows programming 2 remotes, and Google sold remotes separately. I haven't checked on the new remotes, yet.
Fascinating devices. The Walmart streamer is way cheaper and has a way better remote. Really Google? You've had a couple cracks at this now and the remote still sucks.
Most of these function well enough my problem has to do with lack of ability to remember what I am watching and following. My attempt to find a streamer that can do this has resulted in a draw full of devices and I back to Roku that are the best of a poor group.
I usually actually take these reviews as valid but this one just doesn't sit well. The fact that they did not address the numerous issues people are having with the Google streamer. I don't feel like listing them but just search it and many people are returning the product because it just doesn't work properly in which case or the other. Also the fact that the box it's shipped in has no protection what so ever for the actual device is another redflag. Every single one I've seen in store the packaging is beaten to shit to the point where one employee physically warned me that I might not even want to bother going up there cause the packaging was in such bad shape. I finally found one and returned it right after opening it cause 1 it was pretty beat up and after opening it revealed that the whole top side of the device which covers most of the hardware is sitting flat against the back of the box no shielding or packaging at all. Think if you took a cd and took the top of the case off shoved it in a box that tightly fit it and shipped it. There is no telling what has hit that thing or been done to it and obviously they aren't holding up for shipping. Which makes sense why so many of them are having physical issues. Would you throw your $1000 GPU in a box without support around it? No what in God's name made them think it was smart to do with that. In the end their all electronics that can be damaged. Big drop on all fronts.
I love it. Its the google version of Apple TV. It's very fast and smooth. I use google home (and homekit) so it's a win win for me. Love the remote too.
Please don't compare Apple TV to anything Google. Apple TV is the snappiest, most beautiful UI, The most powerful, Best picture streaming device one can get. I loved it. The reason i sold mine was because of the lack of audio codecs but if it has all the audio codecs like Dune HD Homatics Box R 4K Plus that i have, I would never go back to Android. It always chug and stutters. The only that works fast initially is the NVidia Shield but with time, that one even slows down.
@@nitmare64 I have both and use both. This is googles version of Apple TV and I will compare it as much as I want. The Apple TV is good, but so is this. It doesn't lag, it's not slow. the UI is just as smooth as apple TV. This box is every bit as good as apple tv no matter what you say. I own them. You own neither. so just shut up and stop telling others to not compare the top TV boxes on the market.
@@mbvx7 You can compare as much as you want for sure, Even when you are completely wrong and seems like you dont know what you talking about online, anyone can and should have there opinion.
Sigh.... Google needs to stop releasing promising hardware with half baked software support. It takes away from the "WOW" experience that is can achieve. Security camera full interaction from your GTS is a no brainer along with a host of other issues you brought up in your video.
OK, I bought this product and I sent it back right away because actually fire stick and bar cubes do so much more than this thing does and our stick runs a lot quicker
Of course he picked Google because of course he was sponsored by Google probably got paid money and didn't even do a review of how the thing works or streams anything
What exactly is this video meant to do? There is zero info regarding actual streaming capabilities. Waste of time
Agreed what the heck is this video for
This guy in particular has done a bunch of nothingburger videos lol
@@CinemaStevewhere’s Caleb denisen when you need him
But he's been using for longgggg before it was Google TV!
Probably the guy on video just likes to be filmed? Why else would we see him instead of actual product.
Google should have kept their $50 Chromecast 4K for people that don’t need all the extra features this new streaming device has
Agree, but separate production runs are $$$.
@@PhilNickinsonnah theyre just forcing ppl to buy the more expensive one. They're already at peak economy of scale with the chromecast, it's not expensive for them
it's still available.....
The Google TV Streamer has to be one of the worst follow-on products I have ever seen. There is essentially no advancement over the CCWGTV 4k and the new features are things that most people won't use e.g. "Thread" hub. For me, the Streamer is actually a step backwards, it does not allow deinterlacing of OTA broadcasts e.g. HDHomeRun.
Been happy with my ONN 4K pro since I got it back in April. There's nothing at all that compels me to spend twice as much on the Google TV Streamer.
It's really good, yeah.
Totally agree. And the price difference just adds up when you buy multiples.
I also absolutely can't stand the feel of the google remote.
I'm getting the Google Streamer because it has a USB-C port that I use to add a dongle for my keyboard, trackpad, and additional storage. I can sideload more usable apps with it. And the extra gig of RAM and plenty more storage will be a welcome and stable upgrade from my Chromecast dongle.
Hate to say it but this review was bad. Typically you guys kill it. Felt like the review was "hey, it does smart home stiff, neat!" How does it compare to apple tv, Nvidia or other big dogs?
Happy with my Google 4K streamer so far
The best TV device is the 4K Bluray Disc. Best quality AV. No subscription ! No Ads !
Based opinion
@@JadenRoss-v3s Well... he is basically correct. Streaming robs you of picture and audio quality due to a lower bitrate being used. I did, as other pro's have done, performed a side by side with same content from both sources. You are definitely convinced once you see it. So, it is not an opinion, but a technical fact.
Forced trailers. FBI warnings.
Plex full quality UHD rips via a streamer is the best solution.
For me anyway.
@@slerched Most modern blu-rays don't have trailers, and most that do allow you to just press the menu button on the remote to skip them.
Have them on my Jellyfin/Plex. Also, many Blu-ray collections ruin the original intent and / or have modified the shows (Buffy HD for example). Basically, I torrent have to torrent all the correct versions anyway.
I purchased the Chromecast non-4K almost years ago when I went on sale. Should have purchased the 4K version, hopefully the TV Streamer will go on sale during Black Friday. And I'll use my old Chromecast on my bedroom tv. I agree I would trust Google more than ONN for timely updates.
You can connect additional storage if you know what you are doing
Yep. Most folks don't though.
Google Streamer. How does it handle TrueHD, not ATMOS, streaming from Plex? Can it pass through via HDMI?
And I am talking about the TrueHD portion, NOT the lossy "Core" that is included.
Does the ONN do pass through for TrueHD?
I know ATMOS works but want to know if I should migrate from my CCWGTV to an ONN or the new Streamer.
I also heard the audio output options are kind of WEAK on the Google Streamer. I have an AVR so this is a BIG deal for me.
No streaming app allows Dolby Tru HD or DTS HD Master Audio 5.1. Dolby Digital plus or Atmos is allowed. Those lossless codecs require more bandwith for streaming services. Only on Bluray discs you will get them. Atmos is not a standalone on bluray or 4k bluray discs. It is a spatial surround expansion of Dolby Tru HD.
Should come in black with an extra USB port.
Yeah, here in the UK it only comes in the gross cream colour. That match is nothing in my house if they want me to have it out on display they should probably have more options. Then again, I'm not buying it anyway. I got sick of giving money to Google for half baked products that stop working properly 6 months in.
Can you please compare it to the Nvidia Shield Tv Pro?
I love my Shield, but it's wifi antennas are awful, and I strictly use it to stream YT, Netflix, and Stremio
Shield is old old old. No one really cares or wants to compare a device that came out in 2015, 2017 or 2019 depending on the model but they all mostly the same. I had but its lacking in so many things that I ended up selling it and buying the Dune HD Homatics R 4K plus. It does everything the Shield does and more since it has AV1 support. Android 12, HDR plus, Frame matching, All the Audio codecs etc etc etc
@@nitmare64 Play Store? Need Kodi for me to switch from my Shield TV.
The SHIELD is OOLLLLLLDDDDDD...!!! Everything that's on now is leaps & bounds better than that.
@@nitmare64people ask about the Shield because it is the mainstream gold standard.
Most people with a Shield are happy with it, they are still have decent performance for the age, so they ask because they may want to know if it is worth finally upgrading.
I have the Homatics with Core Elec and it's fantastic.
Shield Pro is more powerful. And older. And doesn't have Matter/Thread. The end.
The ONN is worth $50.00 and does the job like more expensive streaming devices.😊
TIVO Streamer is a one-time cost solution for $50. it is fast, but it is a "lightweight" version without extras like Google.
seconded. great little device.
I've already saved up some credits to help buy the Google Streamer. Definitely going with that because it has a USB-C port that I use to add a dongle for my keyboard, trackpad, and additional storage. I can sideload more usable apps with it. And the extra gig of RAM and plenty more storage will be a welcome and stable upgrade from my Chromecast dongle.
I know it might be a stupid question but how does the upscaling compare to Nvidia Shield and Apple TV 4K
Can you cast to it ad hoc without WiFi? Like with an Apple TV?
What about the audio and video delay that every unit is experiencing that Google hasn't fixed yet?
The software support for these is a fair point - the Chromecast 4K/HD are getting 5 years, so the Streamer likely will also, but the Onn streamers will probably get closer to 3 years. I know the 2021 Onn box hasn't gotten an update since the summer and is likely EOL.
Still waiting on the first update for the Onn 4K Pro.
I guess, but they also said they'll continue to support it. I just bought the Chromecast 4K on saturday to update our old 2017 samsung tv in the bedroom and I love it. I have a newer Apple TV 4K in our media room on our big screen and honestly, the CC4K is just fine. I'd prefer another AppleTV but for a bedroom TV that just needed more speed the CC4K does what I need it to do. I wasn't about to spend another $150 on an AppleTV. The CC4K is still snappy, software is still good and I don't know why it would need to be faster or more updated when all most people do is click into an app. And most people should have it on App-only mode to reduce any network bandwidth it's using and to just get into their streaming app easier.
In the Google Streamer, where is the mic phyiscally located? The box or the remote?
My concern is privacy.
My Onn 4k Pro is a little jerky playing back my video from a 4TB flash drive plugged into the USB port. I usually publish MP4 at less than 100Mbps, in h264 or h265. I wonder if the hardware in the Google is more capable at decoding h264 or h265? What kind of bitrate can they support?
I have the Onn 4k pro, bought it because of all these reviews saying it doesn't lag.
Well it LAGS, lags like crazy. It doesn't stutter like other devices, it just straight up goes crazy and becomes unusable sometimes. Scrolling through Netflix has a noticeable delay for when you press the button and the action occurs on the TV. It's very much a mid device, it worked great new but not sure what happened.
I was looking forward to this new Google TV streamer, but they completely killed any excitement I had when they left off a USB port so I could connect external storage. Unfortunate.
That is an awful lot of trust in our company like Google to keep the product around lol
Does it match content frame rate?
What channels can we watch?? Espn, TNT etc?
I have that ONN box and the download speeds are twice as fast as the original Google Chromecast
You forgot to mention that the new Google remote swapped the Home and Mic buttons. This can be inconvenient for people who are still using the older Chromecasts on other TVs in their home.
FYI, the Onn 4K Pro isn't officially available here in Canada. Even Amazon's Canadian site doesn't offer an import option (the only option is for the original non-pro 4K). Even the dark grey version of the TV Streamer isn't available here. :(
lol. Welcome to my world. I don't have the luxury of developing muscle memory.
Fellow Canadian here. I grabbed a few Onn 4K/4K Pro when I crossed the border last summer and it's really a great inexpensive device. I replaced my Chromecast w/ GTV 4k with the Onn 4k Pro since it's way snappier + backlit remote is great.
I must also mention that the main difference between the Pro and Non-Pro versions are the integrated speaker (which is only used for Google Assistant to respond. You can't play music with it for example) and the backlit remote. Apart from that, both devices use the same hardware and have the same capabilities. The Non-Pro Onn 4k is already great if you don't need these extra features.
bought a pair of tivo 4k devices while we were still in the good ole us of a. real cheap, managed to kill ALL ads on homescreen (disabled a service in apps menu, it was that easy). even after the updates it stuck. pretty ok device, as snappy as our shield pro, highly recommended. never used tivo app integration, so cant say much about that. the only downside is that you cant run it off of tv usb port, needs a charger. i really loved our roku sticks since it ran off of tv usb, but lack of codec support made us switch to tivo 4k. im actually thinking getting 3-4 more and paying all the duties and taxes and shipping just to have a few more as backups. oh, never used it with hdr/dv material so i dunno if tivo 4k supports those at all…
Oh, man, I forgot about that little thing. Reviewed it when it came out.
The worse review I today 😕
The onn android tv is 10,000 times better than Google Chromecast
Beside all the smart home functionalities, why would one use this over the native TV apps? Is it even worth it for just YT, Netflix? What advantages does it have over a new Tizen OS? How is the upscaling? Does it even upscale 1080p? Why do Google want me 100 bucks if I have native TV apps. So many questions...
I would use something out of the 'native tv apps' for than I don't need to sit all the advertisement in some apps that take full 8 minutes.. If I watch via the native tv app I can't switch to cable tv while the app is running in the background.. With a seperate device via hdmi... I can..
Hello, Vestel or beko smart tv review please,
Wifey says the shape of that remote is eye-catching
I have a Samsung S95D tv, got a couple of questions:
- what's the advantage using this rather the Tizen OS
- if I use this will it make use of the processor on the TV to improve image quality?
- does the image quality of streaming services better/same/worse if using this rather than the apps from the tv?
Thanks
Advantage is just more of quality of life update. Basically apart from the google integration and more apps support it’ll just be much more faster and optimised experience. There wouldn’t be much of a picture quality though.
Please make a comparison video s90d vs c4
Is the Chromecast dead? I tried mine after a few months and it doesn't work anymore. It just chirps.
Google tv streamer for the win.
sorry i'm not a techie but do i need this if i'm going to get a tv that has google tv built in, like the sony bravia series?
Not on a Sony TV. But Hisense yes cause the TV is slow. It also helps keep your TV from doing any heavy lifting prolonging the tv
Can y’all please review s90d esp against c4
I bought the ONN 4K pro when it came out and it's been nothing but trouble. I have 2 user profiles. one of them randomly stopped working. if you use another app and go to RUclips, it stutters. Only option is to reboot. I had no option but to abandon it and go back to the Chromecast.
Sucks to hear that. Working great for us no issues but we switch back and forth from Chromecast to the ONN depending on the TV. Pretty seamless
2 option Factory Reset or exchange if still under warranty
There's nothing wrong with more choices and the Onn does the job and does it for half the price. Let's also not forget that there are millions of Chromecast devices and TVs running Chromecast so I'm pretty sure Google will have to update it. Currently, there are very few Google TV Streamer devices so if anything is getting updated it's probably Chromecast, not Streamer.
dose anyone know if you can zoom out movie black bars by changing resolution
please research before answering
The Review: "This thing is faster, why, don't know, but is faster".
Totally an uninformed review.
Newer, better processor and more RAM just *might* have something to do with that.
🤔 If I need a Matter Smart Home Hub with Thread, I would get the Google TV Streamer
This is a one sided battle. Google needs to rethink things.
Ironically the google streamer is buggy, with audio sync issues, no Dolby Vision 7 profile support for file playback and no audio passthrough. The Onn has all the same limitions and specs for half the price. without sync audio issues.
Does the ONN support the full enhancement layer for Dolby Vision? Or does it fall back to I think profile 5 for DV support?
I bought an Ugoos and slapped Core Elec on it to get full Dolby Vision support. FEL and profile 7 work great.
Google TV Streamer "Horrible Name, Really Horrible Device. I Fixed that for you Phil. Onn 4K pro is the best value for the buck! Hands down! and its more powerful than The Streamer. Never mind that the Onn pro has better audio codecs. The streamer only has matter going for it. Thats it.
I don't think I'd argue against that. Like I said, I'm a brand snob, too. :p
@@PhilNickinson lol
Is anything going to come close to the Nvidia Shield? Or am I doomed to one day downgrade? Been getting ansy since it hasn't updated now in like 2 years.
It actually just received a new update
I have Chromecast 4k and like where the volume buttons are. This new Google streamer is step back in that regard. Instad, they should have removed the mic button, this is really annoying and I'm never-ever going to use voice commands.
Vudu not shiwyng hdr?
I just came to know which one had better picture quality but this information is not there.
nvidia needs to release a new shield
Seems like a good device, but I'm not sure I can justify $100 for it when the Onn device is only $50. So far Walmart has done a good job keeping up the software on the Onn devices.
With that being said, I absolutely HATE the Google remote control. the Onn device has a much better remote. Feels better in the hand.
Agree on the remotes, but that wouldn't be a deal-breaker for me. (Oh, wait, forgot that I have the *weird* Onn 4K Pro remote.)
Thinking about getting this for my mom so she can watch all the movies I've purchased from Google tv. The movies I watch on my phone. Here's the question ❓ can this Google tv streamer work with a older TV to be able to stream Google tv to a older TV or do I have to buy a smart TV for this to work? Or can it interface through the RCA plugs in the back of a older TV? Thanks
Basically any TV would work as long as it has HDMI
I failed to tell us the Google Home is not matter certified, it can not do local control if you loss Internet connection...
Not all streaming apps work on Android 14. Britbox is one of those. So the Google TV Streamer was a downgrade from the ONN box, which I still use, while the Google TV Streamer is in a closet doing nothing. Probably will never use.
Not mentioning that the Google streamer 4K can’t read NTFS drives is a disservice to us your viewers. This review isn’t complete
Google tv streamer would have been a much easier choice if they included WiFi 7
Can the Google TV Steamer be set up with two remotes - one for her chair, one for mine? (We're old 😂)
You'll share and you'll like it!
i would believe you could shield can, try it
@@russelldye5506 The Chromecast with Google TV allows programming 2 remotes, and Google sold remotes separately. I haven't checked on the new remotes, yet.
Fascinating devices. The Walmart streamer is way cheaper and has a way better remote. Really Google? You've had a couple cracks at this now and the remote still sucks.
I haven't hit the don't recommend channel in a long long time :)
Most of these function well enough my problem has to do with lack of ability to remember what I am watching and following. My attempt to find a streamer that can do this has resulted in a draw full of devices and I back to Roku that are the best of a poor group.
I usually actually take these reviews as valid but this one just doesn't sit well.
The fact that they did not address the numerous issues people are having with the Google streamer. I don't feel like listing them but just search it and many people are returning the product because it just doesn't work properly in which case or the other.
Also the fact that the box it's shipped in has no protection what so ever for the actual device is another redflag. Every single one I've seen in store the packaging is beaten to shit to the point where one employee physically warned me that I might not even want to bother going up there cause the packaging was in such bad shape. I finally found one and returned it right after opening it cause 1 it was pretty beat up and after opening it revealed that the whole top side of the device which covers most of the hardware is sitting flat against the back of the box no shielding or packaging at all. Think if you took a cd and took the top of the case off shoved it in a box that tightly fit it and shipped it.
There is no telling what has hit that thing or been done to it and obviously they aren't holding up for shipping.
Which makes sense why so many of them are having physical issues.
Would you throw your $1000 GPU in a box without support around it? No what in God's name made them think it was smart to do with that. In the end their all electronics that can be damaged.
Big drop on all fronts.
I love it. Its the google version of Apple TV. It's very fast and smooth. I use google home (and homekit) so it's a win win for me. Love the remote too.
Please don't compare Apple TV to anything Google. Apple TV is the snappiest, most beautiful UI, The most powerful, Best picture streaming device one can get. I loved it. The reason i sold mine was because of the lack of audio codecs but if it has all the audio codecs like Dune HD Homatics Box R 4K Plus that i have, I would never go back to Android. It always chug and stutters. The only that works fast initially is the NVidia Shield but with time, that one even slows down.
@@nitmare64 I have both and use both. This is googles version of Apple TV and I will compare it as much as I want. The Apple TV is good, but so is this. It doesn't lag, it's not slow. the UI is just as smooth as apple TV. This box is every bit as good as apple tv no matter what you say. I own them. You own neither. so just shut up and stop telling others to not compare the top TV boxes on the market.
@@mbvx7 You can compare as much as you want for sure, Even when you are completely wrong and seems like you dont know what you talking about online, anyone can and should have there opinion.
Apple 4k doesn't have many apps for playing iptv tv.
Channel Master is selling TiVo for 25$
I see Caleb is back in DILF mode.
Sigh.... Google needs to stop releasing promising hardware with half baked software support. It takes away from the "WOW" experience that is can achieve. Security camera full interaction from your GTS is a no brainer along with a host of other issues you brought up in your video.
OK, I bought this product and I sent it back right away because actually fire stick and bar cubes do so much more than this thing does and our stick runs a lot quicker
Of course he picked Google because of course he was sponsored by Google probably got paid money and didn't even do a review of how the thing works or streams anything
3:41 The extra what of ram sir????
Extra gig of ram
@xplodnow listen to what he said, though 😀
What a worthless review for a new streaming device.
Maybe, maybe not? Uh
Apple 4k for me.
is this a review or a snoozefest 💤 😴
A lot of features to lazy people
Neither get an Apple TV!!!Why bother with lagdroid
Thats true but not everyone wants apple tv
Apple TV is way better
Hmmmm.