Which Rolex Explorer - 36mm or 39mm?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 авг 2024
- Visit our website: barkandjack.com
Buy NATO straps: barkandjack.shop
Hi Guys,
Bob's watches in the US lent me a New Rolex Explorer 214270 Mk II, so I thought I'd go through the pros and cons of all the modern Rolex Explorers, but mainly comparing the wearability of the 36mm Explorer vs the 39mm Explorer.
The Rolex Explorer versions we look at are:
14270
114270
214270 Mk I
214270 Mk II
Thanks again to Bob's watches for lending me the watch.
INSTAGRAM
@barkandjack
GEAR
Camera (video) - Panasonic G80 - amzn.to/2nyCNaT
Camera (stills) - Fujifilm X100F - amzn.to/2EfyFGg
Lens - Panasonic 25mm f1.7 - amzn.to/2nBxBCV
Microphone - Rode SmartLav+ - amzn.to/2E2KpNa
Tripod - Manfrotto Compact - amzn.to/2EbtOpF
Tags:
#Rolex #Explorer #BestWatchEver
Which Rolex explorer is the best?, which rolex explorer should I get?, Is the 36mm explorer too small?, Is 36mm too small for a mans watch?, Rolex Explorer 36mm vs 39mm, what is the difference between the rolex explorers, what is the difference between the rolex explorer 14270 and 114270, what is the difference between the 214270 and new 214270,
For those wondering, the lug to lug on the 36mm case is 43.6mm and the 39mm case is 47mm.
Bob’s Watches: you can borrow any watch you’d like.
Adrian: Explorer
Bob’s Watches: don’t you already have one?
Adrian: a different Explorer
Bob’s Watches: ...
Adrian: ...
Bob’s Watches: sure, but we have other wa-
Adrian: EXPLORER
Haha. That’s pretty much how it went.
@@BarkandJack I hate explorer 1. Same design and color for decades. I will take op 39 any day for that budget
@@precociousdeathdealer202 hate is a very strong word
@@jeanraspail2979 it deserves it. Just like sub it is almost the same watch for decades. And all Rolex except vintage date just and op are grossly overpriced
Uncle Bark, Rolex price is tanking fast,quickly sell all your pieces
They need a new explorer version in 36mm. Imagine: the newest movement and that cool blue lume in that perfect small package.
I agree with you.
Maybe they could make it in a 20mm and have it the same size as the bracket.
@@michaeljasminestewart1618 Idiot
@@ayaanjasiah7723 your right, no one cares, about you
Well you got it now lol
Resurrecting the comments section for 2024, I went for the newer 36mm Explorer ref. 124270 thinking that it would be a perfect match for my smallish 6.5" wrist. As it turns out, this 36mm reference actually measures closer to 35.5mm. Despite my smallish wrist, however, the watch looked to be a "boy's size" for lack of a better term. Indeed, my wife's reaction on seeing it on wrist was "it's nice but it looks soooo small". True, she's used to seeing 40mm sports models (GMT, Sub) on my wrist, so this significant down-size was very noticeable. Her concluding words on the subject, given how well she knows me: "It's not gonna last", and she was right (of course). Although compact and comfy, it was just too small even for my smallish wrist. Literally within days of receiving it, I traded it for the 39mm Explorer 214270 (MK2 dial), which I should have bought in the first place. What a difference that added 3mm makes. I rejected the idea of getting the new 40mm Explorer, only because I much prefer the 20mm lug width on the 39. The 21mm lug width on the 40, and corresponding bracelet width at the end links and wider clasp, not to mention the additional overall weight, was a non-starter. The 39 is literally perfect for my 6.5" wrist in all respects. It looks and feels great. A true 38mm, if one existed, would probably also work, but definitely not the 36...at least for me. I'm well aware that other folks with wrist sizes similar to mine, or even larger wrists, and the purists of course, swear by their 36mm Explorers. There's no right or wrong. It's just a matter of preference when it comes to wrist presence and the comfort level you're seeking in the Explorer.
Fair comment! I own the latest version (MkII). It's a fabulous watch and I also very much like the 36mm versions as well. as you pointed out, My 39mm variant is an everyday watch, never taken off. I have worn it when I scuba, outdoor hiking essentially no quarter given. I don't mother it. Wash it with warm water and fairy once a week. Last month I left it on a tea towel to dry and the picked the towel up. It dropped onto a stone floor at 4 feet, on its face. game over right? No! it worked, flawlessly and continues to do so at +1 per day of constantly worn. It's scratched to buggery and it is absolutely never noticed. It's not flash it's just functional and I adore it. My previous watch was and still is, the 14060 two-liner sub. Twenty plus years now with underrated and venerable 3000 movements, also scratched to hell, works perfectly +3 per day, never serviced. Now gaining considerable value and now worn only on curry night :) I have owned many watches, they come and they go but the Explorer and the sub remain. The thought of watches being stuffed away in bank vaults or watch cases and watch winders too risky to wear in an urban setting is a reason not to own those types of watches. Investment apart, both the purchasers and the industry have forgotten the reason for a wristwatch...a daily dependable companion. It has all got very silly IMHO. Love bark and Jack, thanks for the comparison Adrian, I might just yet treat myself to a 36 :) it is very likable
I own a 214270 mk2 and couldn't be happier. This will stay in my collection forever. I get the historic angle of the model makes 36mm the go to size. Yet the 39mm sits so incredibly well on my wrist it's brilliant. Great review and comparison as always. Keep up the great work love the channel
What’s your wrist size if I may ask plz? Ty!
Sold my 114270 to get the 214270 Mk2. I loved my 114270 and it is still the best looking explorer beside the 1016 in my opinion. But the 214270 has the better bracelet, useful Easylink, better movement and the best lume so far. With the lumed 369 it is far more a homage to the 1016 than the 14270 or 114270. It wears bigger than 39 mm, yes, but if you have the wrist size for it, it is the perfect watch for you. I had the luck to get one from my ad and I love it!
What's your wrist size?
I disagree, even if you have the wrist size (I do), it just doest look right at all. Bloated case with so much empty space on the dial. Plus the bezel is super thick. I was super disappointed in person. Lost its charm.
I just purchased my first ever rolex, and it's the new Explorer 1. I absolutely love it! The simplicity and class of it is something I really appreciate. It's not trying too hard and it's not too flashy, It's simply a beauty!
Keep up the great vids
Ben Elsom
Its just called ‘the explorer’ and not explorer 1
how much does it cost ?
Rolex should offer the 36mm version again. Id buy it as a daily.
Here's hoping they do someday. I just picked up a circa 2005 36mm, wish I had an option to buy new, but I just can't get in on this oversize watch FAD. I'm sure someday soon they will realize the demand for the classic case sizes and stop this oversize case nonsense.
I would buy a used 114270, in fact I did. I would really recommend it.
You’d buy after a year of waiting😂
I bought a 114270 and love it
Brandon Kolar How is 39mm oversized?
I own this 214270 explorer. Its the perfect rolex ever made. The size, the look, just everything. Not much to look at, but i still look at it every day still. Have it for like a year now
Got the 39. Massive fan. Just love it.
Ced GT how long did you have to wait?
@@Ferien7 I was lucky. Saw it in the shop window at my local AD here in Westfields - London (Shepherds Bush Mall) last June. I reserved it immediately as a couple of other people were hovering around. Best decision I ever made.
I asked around prior to that and the wait time was approx three months. Might be harder now though as I haven't seen any around. Hope you are able to find one.
I think people really overstate the size to arm size aspect of watch suitability. It’s more down to taste than anything else. I’ve read people who say they have big arms so anything less than 42mm looks bad, but I think that’s more of a case of guys who just want big watches. I’m 6’3 and over 220lbs, and I regularly wear a 34mm Seamaster that looks awesome. Once you get over the mental block and are open to smaller watches, a whole new world of watches Is open to you
One thing that happened in human: you can't stoped the curious and never satisfied of them, if you have a 36, you will want a 39, and then you have a 39, you think of a 36....
L'amore è mancanza
39mm just feels too big for this watch. 36mm was perfect, glad they brought it back.
I always wanted an explorer for many years but when I tried on a 36mm I was surprised how small the watch looked on my wrist. This always prevented me from buying it. When the 39 came along it was a no brainer. I love it.
Adrian, I first came across the explorer on your channel a while ago and was unable to shake off the love for it. Ended up buying a 39 a few months ago and I hardly take it off. I love this thing. Keep up the great work on the channel and good luck with the move.
I tried the 36mm and the dial was just too small for my taste. Picked up a new 39mm this year and it is probably my favourite watch. It just works in any scenario, and the monochrome simplicity is just beautiful. The brushed bracelet and the way it meets the case is similarly gorgeous to me. The case is lovely and curved.
I think the brushed oyster is the best bracelet Rolex make, I have a jubilee and a polished centre link oyster and the brushed bracelet looks the best and suits the watches more IMO.
Do you feel like the bracelet should be bigger. I'm on the waitlist for one. My Rootbeer is a bigger watch of course but I feel like the bracelet is a bit dainty and shouldve been 21 and taper less...
@@jeremydahm2124 The bracelet suits the Explorer far more than a GMT as the case tapers way more and it has narrow curved lugs. If the bracelet was wider the lugs would have to extend out and that would take away that nice curvy case.
@@TheRunningManZ Thanks for the info my man. My AD says February or mid March. I wanted to secure one before they maybe go 41mm or change the color or worse, take out of the line up for a few years. I'm looking forward to a 2 watch rotation. This and the Rootie.... cheers!
I have an Explorer and I really want to put it on a jubilee bracelet. I love the jubilee.
Too true 39mm Explorer is the best version, especially the mark 2 with the longer hands and lume filled numbers..
36mm, classic and perfect.
39 Mk 1 for me. Love the look of the hands. The feel is that each hand gets progressively longer from hour to seconds, with the second hand fully reaching out to the markers. Plus the full white gold numbers has a very classy/sporty feel. With such a small number of years in production, its a keeper.
Raymond Lam totally agree.
Agree
The 34 mm OP silver dial with 3 6 9 numerals is quite nice aswell
jeppep95 but you have to have a tgv like wrist.
@@madstevens8961 g damn
@@madstevens8961 He probably isn't fat like you.
I bought the 36mm after having hesitated for weeks :) I like both versions but I chose the 36mm because of Don Draper...this watch is a pure class beauty. I’m obsessed with this watch and can’t stop looking at it 😀
NEW 36mm !!! So happy about this release. I pretty much deleted my whole wish list 💜 36mm Explorer 124270 is the one
I Just got the 114270 and I'm absolutely in love with it. The 36mm size is absolutely perfect for me as my wrist are small. Thanks for your outstanding review, as it really helped me with the purchase of the watch. Keep up the great reviews. Keep well.
In isolation the 39mm looks fine if a bit off in someway, I had a look at one in an AD. But next to the 36mm here, even the Mark II looks a bit like that 🐷 it just looks oversized with distorted numerals and indices, which look like they’ve just been magnified and not properly integrated into the design like they should of been. The same goes for when directly comparing the 39/40mm Explorer II to the contemporary 42mm version. There’s an excellent video by ID Guy that explains this perfectly.
The 36mm looks perfect. Don’t know why something doesn’t fit in the 39 model 🤔
Had a new 39 mm for a couple of months now, absolutely love it. It’s just such a cool under the radar watch, good with t shirt, polo shirt or under the cuff of a nice shirt and suit.
I really like your old video where you explain the a differences between the different explorer 1 models, so I have been waiting for this video!
Great educational and balanced video. One point you mentioned that could be expanded upon is the 114270 with rehault. It was only made from late 07 to late 09.
Importanly, this was the same time the finance crisis started and Rolex sales almost halved . They never reduced retail prices but deals were possible on all models. Popular sports watches sometimes took months to sell..
The 114270 with rehault are already selling for more than a new 214270 on the used market
That’s an interesting point. I didn’t go too deep on that part as I want to touch on “rarer” Explorers, such an the Black our, Swiss only dial, rehaut and the flat and rounded bezels. 👍🏻
@@BarkandJack l would sell my soul for a black out. However the Swiss dial feels like a what ever and round bezels on an explorer? Never!
The original modern 36 is perfect. Patina is personal though, as you mentioned but their not rare.They made them for many years.. However they are going up in value at an alarming rate, so what do l know...
I agree with everything you said and personally think that your video is balanced and l enjoyed watching it. I feel the 36 is better proportioned but the 39 is of higher quality. I have owned both and kept the 36. I have a 6.5 wrist and it just fits me better and is more comfortable
Lucky to get my 214270 MK2 in 2018 as my one and only Rolex. It retain its value in case I ever want out.
Got the 39mm 1 month ago and I’m in love with it 😍
I've just bought one, waiting for the shop to open...
Me too; cannot wait to collect once we are free :-)
Alan Richards how much from a dealer?
Paul Young how much from a dealer?
@@tiggerx1 5200.
I got to try on an Explorer 36 today. Sorry, I don't know the reference, but I believe it was one with luminova or superluminova (no little Ts at 6:00 to indicate tritium). It was marvelous to behold in person. I think it would wear beautifully and lightly as an everyday watch, similar to (but of course more exquisite than) a Black Bay 36.
Usually would prefer 36mm datejust or daydate but in this case the 39mm is more aesthetically pleasing by a long shot but cant really go wrong with either
It’s great that there’s a choice between 36 and 39mm. For me, 39mm is the sweet spot. I tried on the 36, but I felt it was a little too small for me.
After being 36mm for 50+ years they decided to move it up to 39mm. To me that suggests they're following fashion trends rather than any carefully considered design in relation to the human form (although average weight increase may have been a factor?). I can't see why they can't offer it in both (like they offer the OP in different sizes), or at least offer the 116000 explorer dial in black with Mercedes hands (such a simple thing to do).
Love the macro shots where you show the lume on and off like a switch🙌🏻🙌🏻 keep up the good work. One of my fav channels watch related or not
39mm without doubt
The 36mm looks more balanced, ratio between bracelet/strap width and case diameter does it for me.
no questions 39 way to go
Interesting to see the 36mm and 39mm side-by-side. Personally I prefer a sports watch to be a little larger - but each to his own.
Best wishes for the new life in Scotland.
You are slowly getting the best Rolex analytics and teach us about lot of hidden/ least talked facts we never heard of even though following most of Horological channel for 5-6 years. Never knew that there is a Mark 1 and II versions of the Explorer and I would without any doubt would go for Mark II 39 mm. Thanks Adrian and wish you good luck in Scotland.
Thanks so much Imran, I’m so glad you think that. Cheers, Adrian
Come on Rolex, we need a 214270 mk2 in 36mm...will surely be a home run!
IKR all they need to do is shorten the lug to lug and slim the lugs.
@@n.h187 36mm dial with Arabic numeral Lumed will look so sweet!
I'm prepping an Explorer discussion as I watch this! Completely agree with you about the 39mm size. Imagine it being 38 or 37.5? The proportions and dial architecture (dial negative space) would improve so much. Great comparison, brother! Hope your move is still going smoothly.
Thanks buddy. I've just dropped you a message on Instagram.
I've measured my 214270 with my own callipers. And it actually measures closer to 38.
I agree and said this over and over again....a 37.5mm version would be PERFECT.
You are a 36-guy and I’m 39-guy, but we share the love for Rolex and the Explorer😀 These comparison-videos are you best work IMO. Both within a collection and broader (ex Kermit vs Hulk). You have a great eye for watch aesthetics and a clear way of telling it. Keep them coming😋
Thanks so much buddy. Glad you like it and great choice with your explorer. 🍻
36mm! Wish they would bring the vintage 3,6,9 markers back!
Great summary and spot-on photography.. got the 39 will get the 36 as well one day..
Thanks a lot buddy.
@@BarkandJack and now that day is fast approaching!
36mm for me. I Tried on the 116000 with the 369 blue dial and its an awesome watch for a great price but it does bother me there's no explorer text on the dial. If there was I would buy it in a heartbeat.
This is exactly the video I needed! You're the man, Adrian. Best of luck with the move.
Thanks so much buddy. 👍🏻
Further to my last comment-I Just wanted to add my thanks for pointing out the clever fold over shortening or lengthening link design on the bracelet, it’s not obvious if one isn’t aware of it. Great design. Thank you again Adrian.
Would have to be the 39mm for me. 36 would look too small on my wrist. Tried an old Air-King on the other day and it looked like a kids watch. Haha
Yeah I don’t understand the air king. It doesn’t make sense.
I still think the old Air Kings are so much nicer than the new ones. They are only 34mm though
@@BarkandJack I quite like the modern air king. It's odd, a brave move by Rolex who are usually a predictable company. I think in a few years we will understand it better like the polar dial explorer 2. That was once considered the ugly oddball of the family and now look at it.
Don Mean yeah the old ones are cool. And 34mm on a bracelet isn’t too bad.
@@BarkandJack Still deciding over an Air King 14000 from 1998 silver dial 34mm and a new 34mm OP white the one like in your video...
I have the 114270 which I purchased recently, and it is the ‘Perfect Watch’, (fortunately my partner Sarah thinks the same).The 36mm is small enough to sit on the wrist in an unobtrusive manner, while being perfectly legible; surely a characteristic needed in a ‘Tool Watch’. In the spirit of the original Explorer: it was designed sit on ones wrist, snugly out of the way, while one was climbing, hacking through jungle, or surviving desert travel. My life is less adventurous, but my Explorer sits very comfortably on my wrist, reliable in all situations. It is also a great investment.
Except the 39mm case, 214270 mk2 is the perfect model. So I picked up a 114270.
I much prefer 36mm but the 39mm has a matte dial, something I only recently discovered. Gives it a slight edge in the tool/sport watch aesthetic over the glossy dials of the (1)14270.
The Mk1 looks like a modern version of the blackout Explorer from some angles, due to the polished numbers. I’m surprised you didn’t mention that. I quite like it for that reason.
I have the 39 Mark 2. Fantastic. 36 just too small....
Robert Nora what's your wrist size in inches?
7 1/2
Robert N Not for me....
That’s a tough one. I love the classic feel of the 36mm, but my brain tells me the Explorer 39 is the better all-rounder for me, especially since it’s a sports watch. I’d love to have an Explorer 39 and a Datejust 36 as a two-watch rotation. Sometimes less is more with Rolexes. Safe travels, Adrian!
Chi-Town California. Totally agree with you. Especially a 36mm Datejust with blue dial.
Great summary! I just bought a 114270 (NOS) I found on holiday in Italy. I could have had the current model but I also prefer the 36 mm. It’s more elegant and suits my wrist better
Got a 39mm MkII from Bob's. They are great. I have to say, I was originally interested in the 36mm, but ended up with a 39. Might just be the perfect watch.
Excellent video as always, Adrian. As far as I'm concerned, you could do an all-Explorer-all-the-time channel. Love that watch!
Haha. I’d love that. More Explorer content will be coming. 👍🏻
There is just something off with the case shapes on most of the Rolexes to my eye. Too big of a flat area that the bezel rests on. The 36mm is the one exception to that visual but it might be a tad to small for the braclet. I have heard rumors that they may alter the Explorer case in the future. I would be interested to see if that enhances the look.
Picked up the 214270 Mk II from my AD today. I also have the 114270 in the family alongside other special pieces collected over time and will swap out the bracelet for the B&J NATO straps I acquired a couple of months ago. Great video that provided the guidance for this acquisition.
This video convinced me that it is okay to get a Rolex. That Rolex. It says put me on a strap, wear my hiking or to work. I'm quality, I'm good looking, and I got you covered
The 39mm MKII only had a 5 year production run and with a matte dial…will be a future classic!
Another cracking video Adrian. Having recently purchased a 114270 I really connect with this video and love the whole Rolex Explorer collection. I can’t believe how much of a difference 3mm makes to the modern watch! I considered a newer Explorer for some time before ending up at the 114270, and I’m so glad I went for the 36mm! Keep up the good work and all the best with settling in to your new home! 👍🏻
Thanks for my daily Explorer fix Adrian. I have the 39 mkII.
I like yours too...
Ref OP36 "...don't expect this to hold value, and certainly don't expect this to go up in value." Haha! Crystal ball needs some AR coating!
Next in line for the 39 Explorer at my AD. It's perfection to me. Can't wait! Thanks for the great review, Adrian!
That’s awesome. Congrats Milton. 👍🏻
There was also the 14270 "Swiss" only dial with superluminova before the 114270 :)
Thank you for giving the OP36 blue explorer dial some love! Finally, this variant is getting a bit of recognition and screen time.
Have a 7-1/4” wrist, my 39mm is a perfect fit. Most comfortable watch/bracelet I own.
A year ago I would have said 36mm period, end of story. The Explorer 1 has always been 36mm. But after buying the new 39mm MK2 and wearing it awhile I have second thoughts about which one I truly like better. The 36mm does look a little small to me now. However the 39mm looks a tad big. A 37.5-38mm case would have been the perfect size. Love all the modern touches on the MK2, especially the lumed Arabic’s and improved bracelet. I suppose it all comes down to your wrist size. Sub 7” probably the 36. 7” and up start considering the 39mm.
Mk2 for me. Slick, sporty looking and amazingly clear dial. Explorer is an amazing Rolex.
Adrian - You're channel is so on point. I have just found in the last week, but have been enjoying your content BIG TIME. In particular, it is informative and thorough, whilst being fun to watch. Thanks mate, and keep up the great work.
Thank you for showing them side-by-side. I was also on the fence, but looking at them like that, I'm in the 36mm camp for sure.
Yaaaawn, another Rolex review. Seriously would this incredibly plain watch have any care factor if everything about it was the same but didn't have Rolex written on it? I doubt it. The 36mm Explorer reminds me of the watches the nurses used to wear when I was a child visiting my grandmother in hospital and for me and has about the same appeal.
Love the channel!
Was in the same conundrum between the OP 114300 with Black Dial and Explorer 214270 MK2. Went with the Explorer 214270 MK2 for many of the reasons you mentioned here and in couple of your videos on both references. Couldn't be happier with my decision. Gorgeous piece and incredible balance on the wrist, and the fully luminous dial is special in the daytime, or at night. Couldn't come to wearing a 36mm as a daily wearer. Thanks for the help!
Keep it up!
Picked up my 39mm last week. She’s a beauty!!
Adam Mills were you put on a waitlist for it or were you able to just go and purchase it in store?
Christopher Chao I was on several lists and told it would be at least a year. However one dealer was more confident and managed to source me one within a week!!
It’s a brilliant design that works in multiple sizes.
If you have a small wrist but like watches that wear a bit larger than the 39mm would be perfect for that.
On the other hand if you had a smaller wrist and wanted a watch more on the smaller and more comfortable side then you would go for the 36mm.
And let’s say someone has a very large wrist and they wanted something smaller but not 36mm small then the 39mm would still look similarly smaller on really big wrists. I love the mention of the Oyster Perpetual as well!
People talk about not liking the 39mm version...but these are almost all people with small wrists. For those of us with 8 plus inch wrists the 39mm version is a God send.
Why is this a constant question? It depends on the size of the man
The 39 explorer is the only timepiece you need. In particular the last iteration w/ luminescent numbers. Owning several Rolex SS tool watches, my explorer is simply…simple in the best way possible
Great video! I went with the 39mm MKII, I just felt that it worked better with me and my collection, and there’s no denying the build-quality...like you said, “it’s the best explorer”...but there’s no denying the awesomeness of the 36mm! The Explorer is just an overall great watch, regardless of case size or solid v. hollow endlinks! Definitely makes you proud to own one!
Personally, I think the 39mm Explorer Mk1 is a quirky and cool watch. It also is another Rolex which will always draw divided opinion between watch collectors/enthusiasts and potentially in the long run people may purchase this on the fact that Rolex did not get it right. Who knows but one things for sure it is still a desirable watch.
No it's just shit
Tim do have one? I have and it is a stunner since the dial looks totally different in different lighting conditions. Low light and the numerals nearly disappear (blacked out) as in most photos. Bright light (e.g. daylight or sunshine) and the gold numerals pop depending on the angle you look at the watch. The Mark 1 is therefore a bit dressier and bridge the gap between a smooth bezel datejust and the sports line.
@@madstevens8961 i don't have one since it's shit, are u daft or sth?
Tim you’re daft
My wrist is 6.5 inches, maybe a little more, and people tell me my 39mm OP in white is too small. LOL!
I picked up the OP 116000 blue Explorer dial & had the mercedes hands (Submariner 16610) installed.
39 mm looks like that bold/big font on your iphone settings. Seems a bit off.
So upset with the remover of 39mm Explorer... waited long for Rolex to improve 39mm and all the suddent being remove.
I like the fact that Mr. Barker chooses to love what he has, even though it is out of trend. I really liked this comparison, going through the history, very interesting stuff. I still don’t quite understand the reasoning for why this is one of the best watches though. It would be interesting to see if the reasoning could be put into words and laid out. I suppose it’s just the simplicity with zero complications and no bezel?
39mm by far. Gorgeous watch.
Adrian is basically the go-to expert for over hyped Rolex models.
36mm and 39mm Explorer over hyped? 🤣 Seriously? In a world of Daytonas, Pepsis, SkyDwellers, DayDates… and you’re here saying the 36mm Explorer is over hyped? 😂
39 because Datejust w/ white gold fluted bezel completely owns 36mm
Right now gotta stick to my BB36, the closest I can get to an 36 Explorer without breaking the bank.
Is there any explanation to why 39mm Explorer Mk2 has such a heavy price premium over the entry level 39mm Oyster Perpetual? Just a swap of a dial?
Different case, dial, and easy-link extension built into clasp.
I always keep an eye on bobs, looking for a datejust, I already have a m series sub and omega 2008 seamaster. I don't mind admitting I bought a bp factory 3130 clone explorer that I really really like, so have my eye out for one.
Become my favourite watch even though its a knock off rep but really well made.
Worn nearly 3 years so really want to look for the explorer now. The BP dial apparently is very good I read.
Love this! I’d also love a comparison of the recently discontinued OP36, with the blue 3-6-9 dial and the 36 Explorer.
Looks, the 36mm wins.
Bracelet, the 39wins.
This was so very helpful. The explorer is on my short list and I did not really understand the differences until now
I noticed that some 39mm Explorers have EXPLORER in the top half of the dial and some have it in the lower half. On 36mm Explorers, EXPLORER always seems to be in the top half of the dial.
39mm hands down! Just picked one up at my AD last week. They are getting hard to get as well.
I’m actually in the market for a 114270 w/box and papers and have my name on a watchlist at Bob’s Watches, but have never heard anything back from them. In December 2017, I bought a 34mm OP w/blue dial from a Rolex AD since it looks very similar to the Explorer with Arabic numerals. I have small wrists and the 34mm works very well and I love it. However, I love the 36mm size (had an OP Date for 25 years) and, of course, absolutely love the Explorer. My search will continue and one day I hope to locate one. BTW: Love your YT channel!
Hi Adrian, Thanks so much for making this video! You answered all my questions about the different variations on the Explorer and even got into the blue dial Oyster Perpetual. Thanks again!