Perfect? Why Is The Rolex Explorer Considered Perfect?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- A brief discussion surrounding the Rolex Explorer. The conversation looks at the watches history but focuses primarily on its design development determining how it has continued to remain an icon. Note: The audio issues will be fixed in later videos.
#rolex #rolexexplorer
![ARGENTINA vs. CHILE [3-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 7](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/De3AWmXzhuA/mqdefault.jpg)
Channel Support: www.paypal.me/industrialdesignguy
Latest Releases: ruclips.net/channel/UCzf6rqsEBni5G2TSevD6F4Afeatured
Community: ruclips.net/channel/UCzf6rqsEBni5G2TSevD6F4Acommunity
I guess im asking the wrong place but does anyone know a tool to log back into an Instagram account..?
I stupidly lost my account password. I would love any tricks you can offer me.
@Noe Blaze Instablaster :)
@Omari Johnathan I really appreciate your reply. I found the site on google and im in the hacking process atm.
I see it takes a while so I will get back to you later with my results.
@Omari Johnathan It worked and I now got access to my account again. Im so happy!
Thank you so much, you saved my ass !
@Noe Blaze happy to help :)
The Explorer is my grail watch! No matter where this hobby takes you, Rolex always intrigues and mystifies me enough to wonder what it would be like to own and wear one of their watches! For me personally, the brand's heritage coupled with the humility of the understated Explorer is the perfect oxymoron! In a world where "flash and cash" are celebrated (or at least appear to be on social media and the likes there of), this model I truly believe lends itself to any environment. It is a luxury item that somehow doesn't have to boast! It just exists for whatever personal reason the wearer purchased it for! It is for this reason, I feel this design is iconic and will remain forever relevant!
Yes all this. I love the juxtapositions between the subdued design and Rolex on the dial. That’s why I have my name on one!
@@vantage789I got mine last weekend. 22427 - latest ref
I can safely say it is what people say.
I think it is the ultimate timepiece, especially in 36mm. The Explorer is my grail watch but, unfortunately, completely unaffordable for me. I own a Tudor Heritage Ranger and it scratches the itch, albeit imperfectly. I am very fortunate to have the Tudor, so no complaints. Thanks for another excellent video.
very decent, nice and humble approach. I wish you to one onday rolex
@@marryalen6286 Thank you for taking the time to respond, and for your kind words.
You have a real gift with gathering and sharing information in a comfortable way. That South African accent adds a great voice to the story as well. Keep it up.
Thank you Eric! A few people have recognised the accent before and its crazy to think how few of them we hear on this platform. I really appreciate you watching my ramblings, thanks again!
Well done. I sold all of my Seiko MM's on Random Robs channel to buy a new Explorer I 39mm. I quickly learned that new ones are extremely hard to find in the US. I called every authorized dealer in town and no one had one. I got lucky and found one a couple hours away from my home. I made the drive and snapped it up. Its even better in hand.
I own the 214270 mark2 for a year now. I wanted this watch since it came out. Never felt this kinda love for a watch. And im proud that i own this model.
Just got my 39mm mark 2 ❤️it
Thank you for such a well done video.
The reason I purchased my 214270 is for its simplicity. I like how it goes unnoticed to the average person. To me it’s the perfect watch.
It can be worn for any type of occasion and feels right.
This watch will never leave my collection.
The Explorer is the watch that comes into mind when I think about Rolex. Classy yet rugged. The other models Rolex has to offer are just for bragging rights. The Explorer keeps the original mission statement. It is a tool watch that will fit any occasion and will look damn good doing so
Classy yet rugged. Well said.
@@brandontran4180 I recently bought a 14270 tritinova variant from Japan. Weirdly I had some buyer remorse and started to think that maybe I would have been better off with a two tone DJ from the 90s (16233) but after watching a few more videos on the explorer 1 I know I’ve made the right choice.
36 mm explorer (124270) has the perfect proportions in my opinion. The original.. the og bond watch of flemming.. so classy.. ❤
“A watch that is not compromised under the pressure of modern standards” -> well said !
Just bought one. Still reeling about the cost though.
I already adore my 214270 MKII but after watching your video I am once again amazed and beyond happy with the choice I made for this under-the-radar-Rolex. There is little to look at and yet I look at my wrist ALL. OF. THE. TIME.
Thanks for this great review,
Chris
Same :-)
Yep same here
Thanks so much for the comment, Chris. It's really a model that you cannot go wrong with and in the context of "Rolex" being the hot topic, this slides so casually around the Submariners and GMT's of this world ;)
Totally agree. I love mine. I can't look at it enough.
@@triples4goodglad I'm not the only one!
My favourite is the one I own, the 114270. The last iteration of the classic 36mm, before the introduction of the modern 'maxi' 39 mm dial.
That was the last 'perfect' Explorer. Very cool.
I agree with the comment above, I think they improved the clasp, movement and lume but the modern version (that I still hope to get shortly) lacks something in comparison. It’s technically better but lacks the X factor of the model you have.
If the older ones were at sensible pre owned prices I’d consider buying one but as they are so close to the new version I think I want the tech spec of the newest version when spending £5.5k- but I really appreciate your version 👍🏼
We’re Explorer brothers then. I also have a 114270, and I’m wearing it as I’m typing this.
Yes 💯
Me too, and on my wrist. Feels ... right. Classy, classic. And I love the colour of the 904L steel - a tint I cannot easily describe, varying subtly with the ambient light. Everything about this piece delights me, everyday. Worth every penny. And it’ll be my son’s in 10 years time.
Owned couple of Rolexes and other watches 114270 is best watch ever made ! Especially latest with engraved rehaut. Even with the new 124270 the older references will still appreciate over time ! Kudos
DIsagree with your assessment on the 39mm. The 214270 MKII is the perfect explorer. I have worn several different explorer variations and none of them look as good as the 39mm.
A most engaging synopsis I must say. Makes you appreciate the model more than ever.
Great summary of the perfect watch. Having owned mine for a year now I still love looking at it each day. Its simplicity really does it for me.
Perfectly plain.
yes less really is more in some cases
I never thought I would like this watch, but when I called my AD in Feb to see how he's doing and I asked to see if any new stock arrived he said he has the Explorer. I asked if he could hold it for me so I can stop by and take a look which he did. I stopped by a few days later and to my surprise I fell in love with this Explorer and bought it the same day. I spent a few hours with him and during our conversation I asked about the Daytona white dial which he responded that they have to many people waiting for me to be added. He asked if I would be interested in the black dial and I said yes that the black dial is very sexy too. He said to give him a few months and that he will get me the black dial Daytona. I was of course ecstatic, but now Covid-19 has taken over the world so my Daytona surely will have to wait with Rolex being shut down. I'll wait since our health is more important then any watch will ever be. I wish everyone health and happiness and whichever timepiece you are wearing wear it in good health.
You are very lucky. According to WatchBox, those black dial Daytonas are becoming the watch to grab! I paraphrase but the comment went something like: "The white dials have had their time and now collectors are looking to the black dials as the something new to collect". As a watch lover, please call your AD guy and make sure its on its way!!!! Congrats on your purchase - really nice taste.
Having handled the 124270 it is a phenomenol watch. The 36mm is perfect size. Simple, classic and functional
Great one again! As owner, if I had to chose one watch as my only watch forever it would be Explorer 39
I have always loved the Explorer design for the reasons you summarised so we’ll. but you have hit the nail on the head with the size. I’ve always considered the 36mm just a smidge too small for me, so was attracted to the 39mm which I bought and am really pleased with. The size is perfect for me but somehow I still prefer the 36mm layout. 37.5mm would I think be just perfection. I’ll get my designers on it straight away.
Hans you’ve just re-released the 36mm version because the 36mm version is the perfect watch and I’ve just bought one brand new straight out of my AD. Thank you.
@@f1shf1ngers24 its Hans down the best everyday watch… : )
@@Giovan_Nino he had his Hans on the ball from day one with 36mm
Thank you for another great review, IDGuy. What I appreciate so much about your videos is that you aren’t using special buying privileges or large amounts of money in order to leverage your way into the conversation. Instead, it’s professional and educational experience, and well-read knowledge. All that being said, the Explorer is my number one Rolex sports watch, taking its place alongside the Oyster Perpetual and the Datejust as my three favorite Rolexes.
Thank you. I am not a rich man haha! My feelings about the subject are probably the same as an art critic or an automotive journalist. We don't need to own a Picasso, a Monet or a Ferrari to discuss their worth, their past etc (though it would be amazing) I am fortunate to know a bit about design which helps with understanding some of the first principals, but its just so great that there are so many people who can enjoy what I bring forward (even if it is polarising) Thanks a lot for the comment, brother.
To me any time only watch is perfect! As for the Explorer being “overlooked” have you seen one in an A D’s window? It’s certainly getting recognition now!
Good reviews & videos IDGuy.
I am not a Rolex fan, but if I was to buy one it would be the Explorer....its a work piece but good looking as well, very utalitarian ! Well presented as always, with good insight and understanding. Thank You!
Vaughan, as always thank you for all of your comments! I'm glad you enjoyed the presentation. I also feel that the utility of the watch outshines the "Rolex" persona, which is why it deserves just that slight bit of attention ;)
@@ID-Guy of course it does, I am not that shallow of a guy. The explorer is the only watch that has resisted the Rolex bling..for that reason it's still cool ok..what about version 2..not a mention ...how about the white dial...silence....and this is from a guy who dislikes rolex@@
I’ve owned the 39 mm mark 2 Explorer for 2 years now and I love it! The dial is amazing to look at. I’ve taken it traveling around the world, hiking and driving at various race tracks. It is a perfect size on my 7 inch/18cm wrist. I don’t get your “negative space” comment on its dial. I think the dial is perfect. I have a date just at 36mm which makes sense, but a professional series watch like the Explorer is best at 39mm size. Thanks for the video.
Your point about negative space and integration made me realise why I love the design of the Heuer Carrera and my Dan Henry 1964 (which is based on the Carrera) so much. It is 38mm and its compax subdials just fit perfectly into the design. This probably wouldn't have been possible with a 40mm dial.
good review , i wear a 36 every day , and i tend to think of it as the ultimate in stealth watches its seldom noticed and never draws attention , its as tough as old boots when im in bike gear , or as sleek and elegant as hand made shoes when im in a suit.
The 6298 is considered a pre explorer
the 6350 was the first actual explorer to officially bare the name EXPLORER
Then closely followed by the 6150 and then then 6610
in the early 60's the 1016 was introduced.
I consider myself an Explorer aficionado, as I own a number of them.
Thank you for the details, LLD! This is brilliant! So then how many references would the Explorer have to its name? About nine? That still trumps the Submariners insane lineup ;)
@@ID-Guy To date there are 7 references in the explorer line up:
6350 (honeycomb dial)
6150
6610
1016 - longest running model of this ref (1960's till the later 1980's)
14270
114270
214270 ( both the mk1 and mk2 versions)
Thank you for the videos, keep up the good work!
Another fantastic video ID Guy! IMHO the Explorer 214270 is almost the perfect watch. The size, shape and aesthetics of the watch allow it to fly way under the radar, as far as Rolex's go. It can dress up as well as down, yet still remain true to it's tool watch roots. I believe it is one of the most versatile watches on the market. If I was forced to be limited to a one watch collection, the Explorer 214270 would be my one watch.
Thank you for the excellent comments as always, Blueshirt! I completely agree. It has that special something that makes it a cut above virtually any watch in the family AND it doesn't look gaudy and pretentious. Out of interest, do you own one? And is it the first or second gen 214270? I'm determined to scour the market for an Explorer in the future when opportunity allows
Yes I own a Mk 1. While the Mk 2 is arguably a better watch, I love the Mk 1’s quirkinesses. I absolutely adore it and it will always have a place in my collection.
well presented as always, man. and yes, 37-38 mm diameter would be perfect, imo. another great one from you!
Thank you Fredy! It would be great for them to make that small adjustment just to keep the elements of the dial that bit more connected. But hey! The latest rendition is still superb, it's well beyond competent. Thanks for the comment, man!
I'm an Explorer II guy, but you make a great case for an Explorer and I gotta agree, well done IDGuy!!
I purchased a new Explorer in 2018 and then a Sub in 2019. I enjoy them both and take turns wearing them. 👍and I agree with you, the dial on the Explorer is mesmerizing.
I researched this watch to death before I bought it. I noticed that you'd commented on most of the videos I watched :-) good form bud. Wear in good health!
FifthPint Ha, that’s funny. I also wish you well with your watch. I really love it and I suspect you do too. Funny story....you can probably appreciate. I wore my “Explorer” on vacation to Niagara Falls and got it wet from the waterfall. My first exploration with the watch. LOL. 😁😁😁😁 Mark
FifthPint I have an Air King
FifthPi
I enjoyed this video. Nice to see how it began. At first, I did not like them but now I do. It can go under the radar not to look flashy. It's nice and thin too. Can be worn with a suit.
What a great video, thank you sir.
I wish this watch came in a 41mm, for my enormous wrists, but even the 39mm is really doing it for me.
I own just about every sports model. The Explorer 39 is my go to watch...
Fact check: Tenzing Norgay wrote in his autobiography that Edmund Hillary reached the summit first. Edmund always claimed they reached summit together. That is pure class right there.
Thank you Pete for pointing that out. I hope the error is corrected in the video.
Great video! I truly wish Rolex would use the same numerals as the 1016 and reduce the size of hour markers. The maxi dial application has ruined the watch for me.
Great video. The only thing for me is i would offer it as a 41mm instead of 37 as you suggested
Thought provoking analysis per usual. I reckon with simpler dial watches such as Exp and no date sub, it's the use of negative space that makes it beautiful. Much harder to make a watch with various complications look harmonious.
Thanks to your channel I now appreciate watches that I would have dismissed as boring and plain before. Less is often more.
Great video brother ❤️ I love my 114270, it’s extremely versatile, elegant yet sporty 👍🏼
Any chance you can do a head-to-head comparison between the Explorer, OP, and Omega Aqua Terra? Versatile models. Similar to how you did a video between top dress watches?
Love my 14270 36mm, got it in 2009 used from my best friend, it's vintage cause of the last year of production was 2001. Great video
🇬🇧 Wonderful review and a great build on Adrian’s video. Its been said on here but you have a great style..... I love my 214270 and its my daily go to watch for work and dinners out. Classy, understated and solid. They got the design spot on with this. Keep up the great work? (Your name we do not know)....
The font on the 1016 is just pure, understated style and perfection. The modern explorer's numerals have a rather unappealing/unsubtle 80s beefiness to them. (imo)
So many people wish for that font to return (and I do too) It's strange how Rolex font has transitioned over the years but it's also interesting that they have kept the layouts relatively the same since the 80's. Very good eye. This subject needs to be investigated. Thank you for the comment!
I have a 214270 and wear it 6 days a week but I plan on adding a 114270 to the collection soon. I doubt I will get rid of either. The modern version is great for dressing up/down but I believe the 36mm, after trying it on, is wonderful for day to day.
Thank you for this! It is great to learn more about the Explorer and feel others appreciation for the watch, which I wear with pride every day. This video was my gateway to your channel and I find your content very exciting. Your points on watch design helps me develop on my horological journey. Already looking forward to the next one😀
Because "perfection" is in the eye of the beholder.
Great video. Sorry to be a nerd, but the reference on the left in the video at the 3:04 mark is the 114270, rather than the 14270. The solid end links on the bracelet give it away.
The new mic really sounds great!
Funny that the video is about the 214270, the Explorer that arguably broke with the lineage more than any other, being 39mm. The 124270 in 36mm is where it’s at!
Fully brushed? Isn’t it polished on side case and of course the smooth bezel?
As always you never disappoint! You offer a unique perspective unlike anyone else that I find not only refreshing but extremely informative.
With the case, movement and bracelet (aside from clasp) being the same between the Oyster Perpetual 39mm and the Explorer I 39mm, which do you feel is a better design? While the Everest history is interesting, I lean towards the black dial OP. Now to get Rolex to offer it with available clasp upgrades.
I love these discussions, no where else on you tube. Great channel
Yet another great video my friend.
It is clear to see how the Explorer is the child of the Oyster Perpetual range, very much like the Milgauss.
It provides a clear and easily legible display of the time to the wearer and lacking a date complication is an ideal ‘wind and wear’ solution which could easily serve as an only watch.
In an ideal world I would be going for the mint example of the 1016 that you showed us in your 2nd livestream. Ever since I saw that I can’t stop thinking about it. Damn, these watch channels!!! ✊
Its interesting to see just how these models all diverged from a single DNA strand. And like the Milgauss, the Explorer has such a charm about it (especially the 1016 - I don't think anyone could pass it by if the opportunity presented itself) Between you and me, look up "Smiths Everest 36mm" - that's more than a good enough fix ;) Thanks for the comments as always, brother AND for your donation the other day! You truly are the MVP (person) of all watch channels on this platform...
I much prefer the Explorer to the done to death Submariner- tho those early references you showed are so much better because they don't have the awful Mercedes hour hand. Excellent video as always! Cheers 👍👍
Right? How amazing would it be for the watches to adopt the older handsets again? There was a comment further up by @LLD that shed more lights on the older references that are well worth looking at. Thanks for the comment, Inkitatus!
If it had the old hands it would look boring to me. Kind of anyway. 😜
Not keen on the Mercedes either, so I went for an Oyster Perpetual in black.
I imagine there are more references to the submariner most likely due to its category. As a dive watch especially with the already added complication of a rotating bezel, the submariner has had to keep up with the competition requiring updates not necessary for the explorer. And where radical departures to function needed to be incorporated into the design-there was instead a branched off with the Explorer 2 and Sea Dweller as not to disrupt the iconic designs of the originals.
The Explorer is alright. It’s not flashy or shouty. It’s an honest, down-to-earth watch - from Rolex, no less. I like that.
Also, excellent video, as always. Interesting points and unique insight from someone who is clearly a professional in design.
I wish the top brands like Rolex would consider using harder, more scratch resistant steels for their watches. Manufacturers like Sinn and Damasko do. My 3 year old Submariner shows many scratches from just weekend wear.
They need to bring back the 36mm
Good points! Definitely my favorite Rolex watch.
Thank you for the comment! It has a special charm about it, no doubt
I want the 36 because the dial feels perfectly proportioned but i feel like 36mm is just too small for my 7in wrist. Kind of hoping someone can talk me out of that thinking bc the 40mm fits me perfectly but i dont like that it drifts from the heritage sizing.
I don't like the upside down triangle. Wouldn't it look better with the numeral 12 there instead?
They fixed the dial/hands proportions with the current 40mm Explorer
Really enjoy your reviews, and love the look and history of this watch. However, can you comment on the apparent ease with which the 904L steel scratches and whether you personally think this adds or detracts from the watches overall 'design appeal.' Thank you!
@ That's great to hear. Thanks for your feedback.
I'm not a Rolex fan, I don't know why but I have never warmed to any of the watches in the range. Other than this one, for some strange reason I find this watch very appealing and as such it is the one single Rolex watch that I intend to purchase at some point in the next 12-18 months.
Hi, I have to congratulate and thank you for the quality of your content. If possible, would like to hear your views on the most notable “every-day” watches in comparison - like one of rge Grand seiko models (SBGA211 for example) vs the Explorer vs an Omega Globemaster vs JLC master control Q1398120 perhaps. For me, all excellent pieces from excellent houses - what do they all do that contrubutes to success, and where do they differ?
I have a 2012 model and it’s my favorite watch and my daily wearer. Great review.
Thank you for shedding some light on that ever fascinating mystery that is the Explorer!
It truly is a mystery...and it takes hold of everyone in the watch collecting sphere at some point when you think about it. Thank you for the comment, hrabanus!
Another great show. Your enthusiasm is infectious.
I found the case dimensions and font of the numerals to not be quite so perfect. Also in perfection you can grow tired or bored with the design.
Which is what happened to me... I owned the 214270 Explorer for a year and got kinda bored of how clinical and charmless it is.
@@alectang1614 recently sold mine along with a Speedmaster (got tired of Speedy Tuesday / Moonwatch fanfair)... One watch guy now, Seamaster 300m (2018)
Am I the only person who thinks the batons are to big/thick ?
Also never seen one of these on a strap that suited it, any recommendations?
Great video....and yes, I agree, 37.5mm would have truly made it perfect (for me)....
Just image? More compact, more sturdy and the elements appearing more integrated? I'm so keen. But we may never see it unless we take our watches into the workshop and modify them ourselves ;) Thanks for the comment, Dan
If I could only own one watch, the Explorer-I ref 214270 is it....that’s why I bought two....
Thanks!
You can never have enough...It's like buying shoes! One pair to wear and another to caress ;) Thanks for the brilliant comments as always, man!
Good video. I think I'm starting to get why the Explore like by so many YT and online reviewers--enthusiasts and fanboys alike. The Explorer never really appealed to me because of the 3-6-9 numerals. I understand that is what many loved about it; but I never did. There was something about that that felt slightly asymmetrical. I don't like watches with numbers on them--except pilot's watches--and wasn't crazy about the Mercedes hands as well. Again, I know that these are the defining features. But, after watching dozens of videos and reading more about it, I am starting to get it. My next step is to see one in person. And, one these SIP orders are lifted in my area I will.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication
This watch is design perfection, that’s why so many people have the Explorer itch they cannot scratch until they buy one. It is my grail watch and I contemplated buying it several times now. My only problem is that I love it’s story and utility as much as the design and sadly Rolex marketing and pricing strategies makes this watch feel really far off it’s initial purpose. It loses a lot of it’s magic and becomes just a perfectly proportioned luxury watch.
Outstanding video! Love the comparison of the Explorer to the 114060.
04:00 I think the 214270 is actually a little controversial among Rolex fans.
Hi...not only is the explorer the perfect watch, your video on it is perfect too...congratulations on another insightful and accurate appraisal of my favourite watch I have ..and I own a few nice watches too
Tensing wrote in his biography that Hilary summited first. On another note entirely, my 114270 is quietly enjoyed.
Just discovered your channel and I’m impressed! Keep up the great work brother 🙌🏻
I've had mine since 1972. I'm not a watch person and had no idea the Explorer had such a following.
The sub is a fashion accessory and the Explorer is a true tool watch. It should have a GMT
Have you been able to review the new 36 explorer?
The 214270 is not a strap watch. The case finishing is very rough where the bracelet meets the case and the lugs are not long enough to prevent most straps being damaged by the case. I am torn with mine, whether to keep it or not. I am struggeling to not to chop it for a used SBGA 203 and nearly 2k in my pocket.
Is yours the first or the second gen? I can understand where you're coming from. The modern pieces seem to be at home on bracelets and Rolex has made an effort to migrate the spring bar holes making straps harder to fit and change (or am I mistaken?) I would suggest going with your gut! There's nothing wrong with trying another watch if you plan on wearing it a lot. All you would have to consider is whether or not the Explorer will go up in value and maybe holding it for a while might not be a better plan?
IDGuy 2nd gen. And yes, it is a pig to remove and fit the bracelet. That the straps get chewed makes it just not worth it. I could keep it, but want to wear and enjoy, and I am just at the point now where the watch no longer excites me and gives me a buzz to wear as my other watches do. This is my second one BTW. I really hope I never buy another.
I am saving for my first Rolex do I buy the OP or the Explorer. great vids as always IDGUY.
It depends. If you want to be noticed wearing a Rolex, then buy an OP. If you want a timeless watch that doesn't draw as much attention, then buy the Explorer.
I'm with you, Rob. A white dial OP would be such a killer choice. Keep your eyes on the prices, you might be able to swipe a bargain five digit explorer ;) Thanks for the comment, brother
@@EricLongTX You are right Explorer for me ,would prefer to be under the radar when wearing a Rolex.
@@robski907 Bear in mind, Rob, that it really does blend in, virtually disappears. Honestly, I've had only a couple of people notice mine at work and those were office watch nerds. You need to be sure that you're OK with no one but yourself having a clue that you're wearing a $6,5k piece of industrial art and history on your wrist. I won't trade mine ever, especially that it already bears marks of somewhat unkind use. Also, I spend inordinate amount of time just looking at it :-)
I think the OP is more "under the radar" than the Explorer. I've chosen OP 39 black.
What a great review, enjoyed every second of the video... Thank You !!!
I own a 2017 Rolex Explorer I and i believed this is the most beautiful watch on this planet. Until i bought the new 39 mm Rolex Oyster Perpetual in creamy white. The two most beautiful Rolex watches i know of.
Beautifully written and delivered.
To make it PERFECT. Peg the size at 37.5mm. Add subtle coin knurling (not 1980s date-date faceting) on the rim to hide scuffs. The polished rim as supplied now scratches very quickly. The perfect edge treatment can be seen on some of the Rolex Cellini watches, and (to utter perfection) on Breguet classic watches.
Otherwise, the Explorer is ideal for most situations.
And whilst I'm here - the latest Explorer 2 size is just too big for most wrists and tastes. You'll see the slightly smaller second iteration rise steeply in value, in the same way as the GMTs have shot up, for no obvious or valid reason.
Sometimes Engineers artists create something so perfect that you don't add anything or take away anything you just leave it alone it would be like adding a mustache to the Mona Lisa or cutting her hair
Agreed. If a 37mm Explorer was ever made, that for me would be the absolute perfect watch.
It’s total wrist candy, great video. 👍🏻
I agree with you, it is one of the most perfect [watches] ever made. Thank you for a fantastic review :)
Thanks for the comment, Jeffrey. After spending so much time thinking about the watch, it really has struck me as something else. It has that X factor that keeps it ahead of a large majority of the pieces in its family (I'd even say the Submariner, but then I'd be crucified)
@@ID-Guy I agree with you. I prefer the Explorer to the Sub - which is beautiful in its own right.
I think that the 'Explorer' epitomises the ROLEX style quintessence.
The 214270 looks odd on anything other than its bracelet due to its uber chunky lugs, even thou not as bad as the actual Sub...also the case construction isnt ideal for leather or nato straps due to the small space between the case and springbars...if I had known this fact before I would not bought the Explorer since it really annoys me. Also the bezel is a bit too thick and detracts the visual focus from the dial instead of giving a border too it...this and the chunky lugs make the 39 mm appear rather like 40 or more. Therefore I totally agree with you on the 37.5 mm or even 38 mm as a better size.
Curved spring bars are the way, Ron. On a straight bar, a leather strap will get chewed up and a nylon strap will likely rub out a mark.
@@fifthpint4571 I have used them but never felt comfortable since these are a build in weak point compared to the original straight spring bars
Great vid! IMHO, the numerals of the 3-6-9 are way too wide and don't hit the mark of excellent balance.
Spot on.
Great analysis of the Explorer. Your exactly correct about the current 39mm offering. It’s a tad on the large size and all that extra negative space causes the dial to be “off” visually. It’s hard to put your finger at first but as mentioned the dial proportions just don’t work as well as the original 36mm. Also Rolex keeping the 20mm bracelet width further causes the proportions to be off slightly. That said I always felt the 36mm was a tad on the small side. 37.5mm would have been the perfect size giving the watch a modern aesthetic and wrist presence while still being more true to it’s original design. It was a dilemma choosing between the 36mm and the 39mm. In the end I felt the larger watch worked better for my 7”+ wrist. The model improvements especially the lumed Arabic’s tilted the scale in the 39mm’s favor. Hopefully Rolex will revisit the case size in the future.
To me the Explorer has always been the best Rolex.
The dial is left uncluttered, there's no glitz or unnecessary adornment, its just a watch that sat in the Rolex catalogue, overshadowed by the Submariner and Daytona.
Prices are still fairly low for what is a stunning watch.
It may not have the presence on the wrist like other models, but its the right watch for someone who does not want to draw attention to themselves, and still have a Rolex on their wrist.
39 is small enough and just perfect imo.
Absolutely agree. I have many watches between 36 to 39. 36 is too small even on my wife's 6.25 in wrist. Also, young people today prefer bigger watches.