+Robert Willis No, it wasn't a sound design. It was fundamentally flawed. For various reasons, they couldn't develop a really large chambered engine, and so had to cluster an obscene number of smaller ones together. These engines also relied on what was at the time the new tech of staged combustion. So, we had a situation where there were 30 new tech engines in the first stage alone, ( 6 times more than the Saturn V, for example, and thus at least 6 times the points of failure incorporated into the design)...plus they had a spectacularly complex system of fuel and oxidizer manifolds between these engines and the tanks (which were spherical and thus an inefficient design) and two additional stages to the overall vehicle, thus adding all those additional layers of complexity. Plus, they had to control this thing during its ascent by dynamically throttling these engines...which is crazy complex...and the Soviets lacked the advanced computer and electronics tech the Americans had access to in order to pull it off. Basically, Korelev, though a genius, was getting waaay ahead of himself when he first penned this thing. Could have been ego, I guess, believing himself capable of solving the problems with such an outrageously over-complicated design. We'll never know if they finally ever actually got it figured out, because there was never a successful launch. I'm work in design, and I can tell you, half a century later, that even by todays standards, such an insanely complex system was always going to be doomed to simple statistics.
Mike DeMarco This was actually the doctor who soundtrack for seasons 5-7(ish). Only reason I know that is because his companion was Karen Gillan who was the super hot redhead from the new Jumanji movie. So it kinda got me addicted to Dr. Who.
sigh, I wish my original post could have been made in sarcasm font.... Notice I said KERBALIAN govt??? I *was* actually poking fun at those who think 'the right stuff' was fake.. It was a joke peeps, chill down. I got given a tinfoil hat and told to look at ISS...sheesh, some people have no comprehension skills.
same i remember watching this years ago sooo many times, videos like this is what made me love engineering and science and is the reason why im even in uni doing engineering and not doing some trade for the rest of my life
this is why this video is fantastic: 1st because it remember us that we have done that, and the steps to coming back from that journey. from the liftoff, the pressure in it, the separations, the orbits, the math, the calculations, the materials, the switches, the multiple gravity variations, the chemicals, the people inside, what they do, their suits, their equipment, the landing, the returning, all that plus, what it was missing was the falcon spaceship vertical landing.
It’s fun watching this in 2022 knowing that it’s taken until now for SLS to start flying, SpaceX went bananas with Starship, and now that’s the lander.
No, I really wanted to see how the (whole) ISS held together during launch and how many Falcon 9s you had strapped to it to get it into orbit. Like I said, watched it right after waking up :P
Aaaaaaaand this is why I'm subscribed. Fucking _majestic_. Also, I still can't get over the resemblance I am the Doctor bears to Suicide Mission. Threw me for a loop at first.
great camera angles, editing, and added sound effects. to make it perfect you need that mod that changes the rocket exhaust based on air pressure, like scott manley has in his current KSP series.
it took me 100 launches to even remotely getting into space using Realism overhaul. Maccollo you should have added realplume to make it an even better cinematic. Even though the SLS mod is probably the only mod not configured for real plume but the lander engine was.Plus i love how RO gives me a 50% chance of crashing my game and having to wait 4 minutes for it to load back up. Murphy's law
+Shizzak The game crashed like 5 times while I was trying to record this video. Now I'm just like: Fuck it, the spaceX/SLS launched Mars mission with Nbody gravity is going to have to wait until 1.1!
even astronomers visual pack won't work and i am getting everything from ckan. Can't use bobcatind mod for the soyuz. lots of really good mods that need some extra tweaking. not to mention but the SLS exploration engine drops my VAB fps to like 0.5fps. have you every had a interstage or a fairing just blow up your entire rocket 8 minutes into an LEO burn. Too many times for me. I fixed it by adjusting the decouple force to something of 30%
+maccollo how did you get RVE working. I get the clouds the city lights and the ground textures but i don't have any atmosphere textures. When the creator said to put the shared asset into the plugin folder and overwrite it, it just crashes on startup
Shizzak I just installed it as per the instructions. If you have problems getting it to work you could try to start with a fresh install of KSP and start by just installing RSS and RVE.
+maccollo i did as you said from CKAN and github for RVE. It works but its a bit wonky. maybe it works better is ksp 1.0.4 but the only thing squad offers is either 1.0.5 or 0.90 beta
Now I want to see it launch with FH Block 5 Boosters, a quad landing of the boosters and this to launch in real life (Would it be called Falcon-SLS? SLS Block 3?)
No way. Clustering lots of boosters can be dangerous you know. The excess acceleration can seriously injure or even kill humans or kerbals. I refuse to build RSS rockets with s***loads of boosters unless I consider redesigning core(sustainer) stage.
The acceleration from using four 5 segment boosters isn't actually that bad. The boosters are already to small for the SLS core with a big upper stage, and their thrust actually drops over the two minutes that they are active, so the acceleration peaks at around 3 Gs.
***** That's only possible if Kerbal SRBs have thrust curve, but as of now, I have to split just one SRB pair into several SRB stages, each stage giving different TWRs by changing the amount of fuel and thrust. I use SMURFF mod instead of RealFuel or Realism Overhaul mod BTW.
The music... oh god the memories Additionally, watching your videos made me try RO. I fell in love before clicking the "launch" button... Only to have it ripped away when I found out my computer can barely handle an orbit capable sounding rocket (less than 20 parts) without some extreme framerate losses on minimum graphics settings.
+Jonah Beale (RCFlyer) It might be the ullage simulation that's using all your CPU capacity. Just open the real fuel config file (realSettings.cfg), and set the "simulateUllage =" line to false.
+maccollo It's getting much better, however a couple of times a second the game stutters with a good framerate in between. Any ideas? Thanks for the help; I just managed to put a 3 person command pod & service module into LEO.
+Jonah Beale (RCFlyer) From what I've read that's caused by the KSP garbage collector. Actually I had the same problem, especially with this rocket. I was able to reduce it significantly by setting up a profile for KSP in the Nvidia control panel with the max number of prerendered frames set to 1. i.imgur.com/3EobR4A.jpg
+maccollo I'm almost there, I've uninstalled most of the non-essential mods for RO, and my framerate has increased drastically. Currently I'm attempting an Apollo 8 style mission, (3 kerbals to lunar orbit) of course launching it atop a very spicy launch vehicle ;)
+The Dockpacka Keeper The key to rendezvous is combining patience and careful orbit adjustments. You also have to use the nav ball a lot, keep the prograde and pro target vectors aligned and keep the velocity under control and you'll get there. Scott Manley made a good tutorial video on this, it helped me understand the concept. For my first rendezvous I built two crafts specifically designed to be easy to maneuver during docking. I kept the relatively light with 4 way RCS thrusters equidistant from the center of mass of the craft. I put one in a perfectly circular orbit to make things easier, then I launched the second one and flew it closer nice and slowly. It gets much easier after the first successful time, it's like something clicks into place in your brain, you get that "OOH, that's how you do it, of course!" moment. :D
Excellent video. Things have changed a bit since you did this. SN10 just had to blow up, but it did land, proving Starship is making fantastic progress. NASA's CEV or whatever it's name is now is delayed, again. It did fly, made a mistake, it was recovered, so it's going to work and work well. But things are improving, plenty of optimism.
Stars in a daylight moon landing? You have to be the hero of all conspiracy theorists ;) Anyway, loved your previous videos and decided to abo, and good thing I did, too.
Maybe, eyes are just enough sucseptible to see stars, whils camera isn't . On the Moon small density of ionized dust wouldn't be enough to scatter light from ground thus making stars visible.
Even with the daylight? I thought it would be impossible to see stars in the daylight of the moon... Mainly because of the reflection of the light on moon's surface, offuscating the stars.
KV_IRA the reason you couldn’t see stars from the pictures on the moon was because the moon reflects a lot of light. In order to be able to see detail on of the surface of the moon and of the astronauts. They brought the exposure of the camera way down. Therefore, you aren’t able to see the stars on the Apollo pictures.
Most of the "terminology" is pretty intuitive. The only things are probably the abbreviations. TWR: Thrust to weight ratio (TWR is the ratio of how much thrust you are producing and the weight of your rocket) LEO: Low Earth Orbit TLI: Trans Lunar Injection (a burn to raise your apoapsis (the highest point in your orbit) to intersect the Moon's orbit, ahead of the Moon's current location (as the moon is gonna move while you're going to it)) Some more stuff: Propellant: Fuel Orion: The name of the spacecraft (Orion is a real spacecraft currently being developed) Capture burn: The burn to decelerate enough to which the gravity of said object (in this case the Moon) is suffiecent to prevent you from exiting it's SOI (sphere of influence, or the sphere in which it's gravity is the main influence to an object) Escape burn: The burn to accelerate enough to which your trajectory will take you out of it's SOI.
I realise time and time again how shit i am with this game for not attempting to make the full use of its awesome potential! Thanks for your videos, they are inspiring!!
Good video, but are you sure solid boosters are not powerful enough? Watch this solid rocket booster test for the SLS rocket ruclips.net/video/Qn6OvHofcoo/видео.html Or did you mean the solid boosters in the mods you were using were not powerful enough?
Quite certain. The 5 segment boosters only allow for 120 tons of initial mass to LEO with the EUS upper stage. That's not enough to do this mission with Orion. The quad F9 setup has about 58% more impulse than the 5 segment boosters.
i dont understand wyhat is this a recreation of a future space program or what the heck but this was a masterpiece especially when u transfered the idk those people into the other capsule , very well planned
![[Real Solar System] - To the Moon using only SRBs](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yhdrCxin7A0/mqdefault.jpg)
And 7-8 years later the SLS actually finally launched, could only imagine the awesomeness if this version would actually fly though
With spare falcon 9’s because falcon will have been replaced with starship
@@ThePixelated_kris starship heavy, a starship boosted by 4 falcon heavys.
@@fast-toast wat
40 engines.
Finally putting the N-1 to shame.
yeahh .....
HE COULD DO BETTER
+HALL9000ish The N1 was put to shame when it kept blowing up.
Oh my god people who know history of rocketry!!! I love both of y'all.
+HALL9000ish The good thing for Space X is that they produce HUGE amounts of their engines -> they can test them really good.
+Robert Willis No, it wasn't a sound design. It was fundamentally flawed. For various reasons, they couldn't develop a really large chambered engine, and so had to cluster an obscene number of smaller ones together. These engines also relied on what was at the time the new tech of staged combustion. So, we had a situation where there were 30 new tech engines in the first stage alone, ( 6 times more than the Saturn V, for example, and thus at least 6 times the points of failure incorporated into the design)...plus they had a spectacularly complex system of fuel and oxidizer manifolds between these engines and the tanks (which were spherical and thus an inefficient design) and two additional stages to the overall vehicle, thus adding all those additional layers of complexity. Plus, they had to control this thing during its ascent by dynamically throttling these engines...which is crazy complex...and the Soviets lacked the advanced computer and electronics tech the Americans had access to in order to pull it off. Basically, Korelev, though a genius, was getting waaay ahead of himself when he first penned this thing. Could have been ego, I guess, believing himself capable of solving the problems with such an outrageously over-complicated design. We'll never know if they finally ever actually got it figured out, because there was never a successful launch. I'm work in design, and I can tell you, half a century later, that even by todays standards, such an insanely complex system was always going to be doomed to simple statistics.
Now land the first stage.
+Get Clarked All of them :)
+Tomasz Dzieduszynski SpaceX actually landed the first stage.
I know - I'm challenging the OP to land all 4 of those Falcons simultanously within the game. :P
+Tomasz Dzieduszynski then carry out the mission.... hehehe. Pushing KSP To its limits (and perhaps slightly beyond)
+Clark been there, done that.
1:23 it is global warming. lakes disappears
Lmao it's true
@@Hygix_ lol your pfp is my wallpaper
@@chonk3358 lol
@@chonk3358 CHONK
@@Hygix_ chonk indeed
Accidentally clicked on on video
Was about to go
Then the music started
Stayed and subbed
Good boi
music from The Doctor
Same
@@Jvdbreemen ikr
@@Jvdbreemen is sus
50+ years ago as a teen I watched the race to the Moon. Fifty years later My eyes got misty again watching the animation of a new Moon mission.
It's not an animation. It's a game, and that's even better.
+Kenneth Cummings It's a game, and pretty realistic one actually. If you like space then it's a great thing to try out. ;)
+Kenneth Cummings However dat graphics doe... It looks like a serious animation tbh.
+GamerGab007 That just means that many simulations look bad ^^ While the game looks good a simulation could look 20 times better.
And that's why I love KSP
I though it was a falcon 9 being boosted by rockets
NO ITS A ROCKET BEING BOOSTED BY FALCON 9'S HOLY SHIT
givingtnt the nasa’s space launch system rocket being boosted by falcon heavy’s
@@spamlord7570 Sick!😂
You better say sorry
YOU BETTER SAY SORRY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😡
@@tamicadawkins5488 sorry
6:06 THAT SONIC BOOM WAS SICK!!!
would it even form at such low pressures?? either way it was cool :P
How would that hhappen in RO KSP? Is that edited?
It was a Camera Tools mod feature
atsay714 yikes
Gotta go fast?
Loved the soundtrack for this video. Really helped to pass the timey wimey ;)
Mike DeMarco This was actually the doctor who soundtrack for seasons 5-7(ish). Only reason I know that is because his companion was Karen Gillan who was the super hot redhead from the new Jumanji movie. So it kinda got me addicted to Dr. Who.
Wibbily Wobbly Timey Wimey. Stuff
@@thirdeyestudios5935 i have no idea where he gets that stuff from is actually a quote from DW. its in day of the doctor
They never really went there. This is what the Kerbalian Govt wants you to believe.
tinfoil hat on
Antifoul Awl you do realise that you can see the ISS in the sky at night?
sigh, I wish my original post could have been made in sarcasm font.... Notice I said KERBALIAN govt??? I *was* actually poking fun at those who think 'the right stuff' was fake.. It was a joke peeps, chill down. I got given a tinfoil hat and told to look at ISS...sheesh, some people have no comprehension skills.
All CGI! :D
+Antifoul Awl I'm pretty sure the tinfoil hat one was sarcastic
6:06 by far the best few seconds I've seen of any KSP video. AWESOME!!!!!
Juan Pretorius yikes
This guy loves Doctor who
Who doesn't?
kelly Whitehead Me?
Geronimo!!!
Doctor who
@@fluffieboi3139 Exactly what we are asking!
I saw the faring open to reveal the lander and did a double-take. Up until that point I thought it was just a flyby or orbit operation.
Well done.
It'd be wild to see 4 Falcon 9 boosters landing simultaneously
Now do an SLS boosted ITS
To Titan.
lambaline *BFR
@@maxpower19711 BRF is overused
@@maxpower19711 Super Heavy Starhip SHS*
@@paulambert9207 so if it was called Natonial Super Heavy for some dumb reason would it been medical NHS
Hypersonic boom at 6.06 gave me the chills! :D
Will never get over the fact that people did that for real, some of them more than once!
6:06*
@@felreymiguel5734 rest in pieces mate
@@SilverJavelin more like rust in peice
The sounds in this are amazing!! And the sonic boom at 6:06, fucking sick.
+UKRider agree!!
Someone should really mod that stuff in.
That was the sound barrier being broken from how fast it was going
Obviously when that pod was falling towards Earth at approx. 10.6 mach
+Ethan Bird Yeah, it's called a sonic boom...
The score for when Matt was the Doctor will always give me chills. Also NASA should hire you for the new Moon missions.
macollo would be amazing at making promotional videos
nostalgic! when i was 6 years old, everyday i watched this video, thanks for making my life better :).
same i remember watching this years ago sooo many times, videos like this is what made me love engineering and science and is the reason why im even in uni doing engineering and not doing some trade for the rest of my life
I thought I was the only one with this, but no lol
When the Doctor Who came it hyped me out
hello Stonehenge!
this is why this video is fantastic: 1st because it remember us that we have done that, and the steps to coming back from that journey. from the liftoff, the pressure in it, the separations, the orbits, the math, the calculations, the materials, the switches, the multiple gravity variations, the chemicals, the people inside, what they do, their suits, their equipment, the landing, the returning, all that plus, what it was missing was the falcon spaceship vertical landing.
Doctor Who music :)
HELL yeah
Gallifrey！
Back when the show was good...
Music look like a remix of suicid mission of Mass effect 2
@@jackheier174 still is.
It’s fun watching this in 2022 knowing that it’s taken until now for SLS to start flying, SpaceX went bananas with Starship, and now that’s the lander.
I can't tell you how many times I've watched this video... absolutely love it!
Watching this right after waking up, I was wondering when the part where 'Falcon 9 boosted ISS to the moon' starts.
No, I really wanted to see how the (whole) ISS held together during launch and how many Falcon 9s you had strapped to it to get it into orbit.
Like I said, watched it right after waking up :P
+Janne Aalto Woke up from a nap, read this comment and saw "Falcon 9 boosted ISIS to the moon".
The ISS was sent up seperatly
That would be glorious
@@jessealternate6050 it kind of did but it was a very small company launching mini falcon 1s
I approve this music.
we all do.
I don’t
Remixed 11th doctor music am i right?
mike WIZZ ye
10 is best, no one can argue.
Aaaaaaaand this is why I'm subscribed. Fucking _majestic_.
Also, I still can't get over the resemblance I am the Doctor bears to Suicide Mission. Threw me for a loop at first.
great camera angles, editing, and added sound effects.
to make it perfect you need that mod that changes the rocket exhaust based on air pressure, like scott manley has in his current KSP series.
That was extremely efficient and epic! I do not think that I could ever do this! Also, epic music.
Me playing on RO:
**Builds 1200 tons moon mission**
**Gets back using the kerbal parachute**
"Yeah, a complete success, 60 science"
What is RO?
@@schizophil1 realistic overhaul I think
it took me 100 launches to even remotely getting into space using Realism overhaul. Maccollo you should have added realplume to make it an even better cinematic. Even though the SLS mod is probably the only mod not configured for real plume but the lander engine was.Plus i love how RO gives me a 50% chance of crashing my game and having to wait 4 minutes for it to load back up. Murphy's law
+Shizzak
The game crashed like 5 times while I was trying to record this video. Now I'm just like: Fuck it, the spaceX/SLS launched Mars mission with Nbody gravity is going to have to wait until 1.1!
even astronomers visual pack won't work and i am getting everything from ckan. Can't use bobcatind mod for the soyuz. lots of really good mods that need some extra tweaking. not to mention but the SLS exploration engine drops my VAB fps to like 0.5fps. have you every had a interstage or a fairing just blow up your entire rocket 8 minutes into an LEO burn. Too many times for me. I fixed it by adjusting the decouple force to something of 30%
+maccollo how did you get RVE working. I get the clouds the city lights and the ground textures but i don't have any atmosphere textures. When the creator said to put the shared asset into the plugin folder and overwrite it, it just crashes on startup
Shizzak
I just installed it as per the instructions. If you have problems getting it to work you could try to start with a fresh install of KSP and start by just installing RSS and RVE.
+maccollo i did as you said from CKAN and github for RVE. It works but its a bit wonky. maybe it works better is ksp 1.0.4 but the only thing squad offers is either 1.0.5 or 0.90 beta
Now I want to see it launch with FH Block 5 Boosters, a quad landing of the boosters and this to launch in real life (Would it be called Falcon-SLS? SLS Block 3?)
I once strapped 6 Falcon 9 boosters around a center tank. Called it the Falcon 42. Didn't even panic!
This makes me want to play KSP again.
Yesterday on October 20 2021 Artemis 1 wast stacked marking the first time a heavy launch vehicle is in the VAB since skylab
Time flies
idk why this is one of the most watched KSP videos ever but it looks pretty nice!
And I'm happy when I orbited 1 time around the moon and got back safely...
toskana98 I have been playing for a month and "landed" on minmus.
Hey, that's a whole different league than the mun. Be proud of yourself!
Great mission and some awesome use of Dr Who music, really fits with KSP :)
Infinity War: This is the most ambitious crossover event in history.
Falcon 9-Boosted SLS: Hold my rocket fuel
Cringe
The cringe makes me wanna throw up
That x shaped rille next to where you landed is a nice touch. X marks the spot
Nice work with the music, madman with a box!
That reentry was SICK.
I wish stock KSP had that.
Cluster a bunch of 5 segment solid fuel rocket motors together and you have a booster that can send anything anywhere.
No way. Clustering lots of boosters can be dangerous you know. The excess acceleration can seriously injure or even kill humans or kerbals. I refuse to build RSS rockets with s***loads of boosters unless I consider redesigning core(sustainer) stage.
The acceleration from using four 5 segment boosters isn't actually that bad. The boosters are already to small for the SLS core with a big upper stage, and their thrust actually drops over the two minutes that they are active, so the acceleration peaks at around 3 Gs.
***** That's only possible if Kerbal SRBs have thrust curve, but as of now, I have to split just one SRB pair into several SRB stages, each stage giving different TWRs by changing the amount of fuel and thrust. I use SMURFF mod instead of RealFuel or Realism Overhaul mod BTW.
Kerbal SRBs have thrust curve at least in RO.
Isukaman to
As soon as I heard "I am the Doctor" I started freaking out.
Congratulations, maccollo, you earned a new subscriber!
love the dr who music in the back
The music...
oh god the memories
Additionally, watching your videos made me try RO.
I fell in love before clicking the "launch" button... Only to have it ripped away when I found out my computer can barely handle an orbit capable sounding rocket (less than 20 parts) without some extreme framerate losses on minimum graphics settings.
+Jonah Beale (RCFlyer)
It might be the ullage simulation that's using all your CPU capacity.
Just open the real fuel config file (realSettings.cfg), and set the "simulateUllage =" line to false.
+maccollo
It's getting much better, however a couple of times a second the game stutters with a good framerate in between. Any ideas? Thanks for the help; I just managed to put a 3 person command pod & service module into LEO.
+Jonah Beale (RCFlyer)
From what I've read that's caused by the KSP garbage collector. Actually I had the same problem, especially with this rocket. I was able to reduce it significantly by setting up a profile for KSP in the Nvidia control panel with the max number of prerendered frames set to 1.
i.imgur.com/3EobR4A.jpg
+maccollo
I'm almost there, I've uninstalled most of the non-essential mods for RO, and my framerate has increased drastically. Currently I'm attempting an Apollo 8 style mission, (3 kerbals to lunar orbit) of course launching it atop a very spicy launch vehicle ;)
Hey would you mind sharing your specs? I'm still saving for a PC, and my main focus is basically being able to run Realism Overhaul.
*Music started*
RELEASE THE INNER-NERD!
6:12 the crew freakout lol
I love how bob goes from screaming to chill in less than a minute
I remember that music from somewhere...
really? iTS DOCTOR WHO. "i am the doctor"
It's from doctor who
lol how to trigger a whovian
liam ward I am a whovian, I can confirm I am triggered
It is from Doctor Who
My mind is blow! I can't even rendezvous two ships in earth orbit! Let alone do THAT!
+The Dockpacka Keeper The key to rendezvous is combining patience and careful orbit adjustments. You also have to use the nav ball a lot, keep the prograde and pro target vectors aligned and keep the velocity under control and you'll get there. Scott Manley made a good tutorial video on this, it helped me understand the concept. For my first rendezvous I built two crafts specifically designed to be easy to maneuver during docking. I kept the relatively light with 4 way RCS thrusters equidistant from the center of mass of the craft. I put one in a perfectly circular orbit to make things easier, then I launched the second one and flew it closer nice and slowly.
It gets much easier after the first successful time, it's like something clicks into place in your brain, you get that "OOH, that's how you do it, of course!" moment. :D
The key to it is knowing you nav ball and practice. Like the other commenter, I recommend Scott Manley's video, as it was my rendezvous teacher
not when you are limited by ignitions mate
+Chris R High ignitions and rcs, you'll be fine
The Ultimate Cross-Over
11th Doctor's theme FTW!
i perfer the 13ths guitar solo xD
yesss doctor who!! that's all I could think about throughout the video. and now I will go binge watch the new episodes.
Excellent video. Things have changed a bit since you did this. SN10 just had to blow up, but it did land, proving Starship is making fantastic progress. NASA's CEV or whatever it's name is now is delayed, again. It did fly, made a mistake, it was recovered, so it's going to work and work well. But things are improving, plenty of optimism.
Thanks for the music!!
Know I want to watch Doctor Who!!!!!!! :)
IS FROM THAT. I FINALLY REMEMBER WHERE DID I HEARD IT FIRST, THX
GG I love the Doctor Who Music!!
doctor who music 11/10
1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000/10
You Sir, are amazing! You definitely deserve more subs!
This is a badass concept. One that may one day be true with the tight alliance forged between SpaceX & NASA.
I dropped everything cause I heard "I am the Doctor" playing
i think Elon Musk is doing a career run, otherwise he would have turned on cheats
Love the Doctor Who Music
This was absolutely amazing to watch
Love the "I am The Doctor" score from Doctor Who in the beginning... :)
I Am The Doctor makes everything better.
The doctor who music is the best part
Stars in a daylight moon landing? You have to be the hero of all conspiracy theorists ;)
Anyway, loved your previous videos and decided to abo, and good thing I did, too.
+sesnd Haha
Maybe, eyes are just enough sucseptible to see stars, whils camera isn't . On the Moon small density of ionized dust wouldn't be enough to scatter light from ground thus making stars visible.
Even with the daylight? I thought it would be impossible to see stars in the daylight of the moon... Mainly because of the reflection of the light on moon's surface, offuscating the stars.
sesnd yes you can see planets and the earth.
KV_IRA the reason you couldn’t see stars from the pictures on the moon was because the moon reflects a lot of light. In order to be able to see detail on of the surface of the moon and of the astronauts. They brought the exposure of the camera way down. Therefore, you aren’t able to see the stars on the Apollo pictures.
Watches video as soon as I get in I hear Doctor Who already in love.
Nice choice of music - didn't think doctor who would work so well in kerval space program but now that I think about it, it makes allot of sense..
wow what a lucky subscriptions check!
+AJIuK1 How many subscriptions do you have?? XD
I have over 600
Then yes, you're right. XD (I have like 30, and think they might be too many. ^^U )
I don't have cable so this is my equivalent. 8)
+No Name
Who even watches TV nowadays?
This is a guess, but does TLI burn stand for Trans-Lunar Injection?
+DowzerWTP72 Yes it does :)
Right. There's others: TJI TCI *TMI Mars*
Trans Jovian injection
Trans Cryethian injection
And Trans Mars Injection
I love how he just assumes that we are space nerds and know all the terminology
Most of the "terminology" is pretty intuitive. The only things are probably the abbreviations.
TWR: Thrust to weight ratio (TWR is the ratio of how much thrust you are producing and the weight of your rocket)
LEO: Low Earth Orbit
TLI: Trans Lunar Injection (a burn to raise your apoapsis (the highest point in your orbit) to intersect the Moon's orbit, ahead of the Moon's current location (as the moon is gonna move while you're going to it))
Some more stuff:
Propellant: Fuel
Orion: The name of the spacecraft (Orion is a real spacecraft currently being developed)
Capture burn: The burn to decelerate enough to which the gravity of said object (in this case the Moon) is suffiecent to prevent you from exiting it's SOI (sphere of influence, or the sphere in which it's gravity is the main influence to an object)
Escape burn: The burn to accelerate enough to which your trajectory will take you out of it's SOI.
I realise time and time again how shit i am with this game for not attempting to make the full use of its awesome potential!
Thanks for your videos, they are inspiring!!
A great vid! Loved the directing & epicness :)
the block 1b SLS rocket will fly someday in the 2020s
yep but SLS will never fly with SpaceX Falcon 9 as booster
BUT WE HAVE CORONA
You forgot to make the Falcon 9 boosters reusable
I need these engine sounds
The Doctor Who music was an excellent touch to this great video. :D
the sounds of those flames give me chills
DAT MUSIC!
#SUBBEDBECAUSEOFMUSICONONEVID
Well said my friend.... well said.
If you don't know it, it's "I am the Doctor" by Murray Gold I believe.
+Thomas Wingfield was it from the 50th anniversary?
+Thomas Wingfield Yeah I know, one of my favourite of all time but thanks anyway!
+Top Hat Towers No, it was originally in the first 11th doctors episode
Looks like a cigarette
Still not as many engines as the ITS. :D
boost an SLS with 4 ITS boosters now thats something i wanna see
Drake Hamilton Strapping the SLS core stage onto an ITS stack would be more imaginable (though pointless due to the ITS core's low thrust).
NetRolller3D ah screw it! SLS strapped to ITS strapped to SLS lets go!
BigDiglett omg!
This video has put doctor who to shame. THIS IS AMAZING!
OH MY GOSH THE "I AM THE DOCTOR" SONG AT THE OPENING
Doctor Who!
Good video, but are you sure solid boosters are not powerful enough?
Watch this solid rocket booster test for the SLS rocket ruclips.net/video/Qn6OvHofcoo/видео.html
Or did you mean the solid boosters in the mods you were using were not powerful enough?
This is for going to the moon BTW
Quite certain. The 5 segment boosters only allow for 120 tons of initial mass to LEO with the EUS upper stage. That's not enough to do this mission with Orion. The quad F9 setup has about 58% more impulse than the 5 segment boosters.
***** If that is not enough to go to the moon then how the heck will SLS get to mars? Also how much does your lander weigh?
***** Protips for docking?
Put the docking ports together.
Every body gangster till it lands on da moon
That has to be the best astronaut I have ever seen!
Its when you do those missions return to earth and go "shit I forgot a parachute" that are the best
Or ablator amounts aren't sufficient from excessive mass savings.
Kerbel Space program, the game for geniuses. Nice vid!
That was the most beautiful gameplay ever created
For some reason, I find this more inspiring than all the NASA stuff. Lol.
i dont understand wyhat is this a recreation of a future space program or what the heck but this was a masterpiece especially when u transfered the idk those people into the other capsule , very well planned
love the music so geronimo!
Really nice video:)
Love the Doctor Who music, I knew I recognized it but it took me a minute to remember where it was from.
Ah that music and that sweet Roaring sound.
They asked him "how much thrust do you need?"
"ALL OF THE THRUST"
Psychiatrist : The Frankenrocket can't hurt you, It doesn't exist
The Frankenrocket: