TTArt 56mm f/1.8 AF lens review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 55

  • @steve3751
    @steve3751 7 месяцев назад +82

    Please do a 4-way comparison: Sigma 56mm 1.4 vs Viltrox 56mm 1.4 vs Viltrox 56mm 1.7 vs TTartisan 56mm 1.8

    • @erikekanugraha1735
      @erikekanugraha1735 7 месяцев назад

      Up

    • @SnIpErX07
      @SnIpErX07 7 месяцев назад +5

      The original fujifilm 56f1.2 and the new 56 f1.2 WR as well!

    • @CocoKoi321
      @CocoKoi321 6 месяцев назад +2

      AND THE YONGNUO 50MM

    • @rahmanmaarif
      @rahmanmaarif 6 месяцев назад

      Up

    • @momoz88
      @momoz88 6 месяцев назад

      Was about to suggest the same.

  • @gavinphillips3973
    @gavinphillips3973 7 месяцев назад +19

    I would love to see a comparison between this lens and the Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN. I realise there's quite a big difference in price but it'd be interesting none the less I think. Very happy with the Sigma 56mm but intrigued with these new lenses.

    • @classic.cameras
      @classic.cameras 7 месяцев назад +2

      Spoiler. The Sigma 56mm f1.4 is vastly better.

    • @VincentTse
      @VincentTse 7 месяцев назад +3

      shd compare this with Viltrox 56 1.7 instead

    • @Patrick-vi9xr
      @Patrick-vi9xr 7 месяцев назад

      @@VincentTse Viltrox also much better than TT

    • @matango1979
      @matango1979 6 месяцев назад +2

      If you own the sigma, why would this interest you?

  • @McMaxW
    @McMaxW 7 месяцев назад +10

    Would you consider doing a 50mm lens comparison? Lately we are getting so many new 50/56mm lenses (from Viltrox, Sigma, Fuji, etc) that is hard to know which one is the best option?

  • @Junifoto
    @Junifoto 7 месяцев назад +8

    hey Cris, good to see you, im your Fan since 10 years. Regards from Germany

  • @danieldavis6316
    @danieldavis6316 7 месяцев назад +10

    I thought you already reviewed this, but I was just thinking of the recent Viltrox lens lol

  • @DigiDriftZone
    @DigiDriftZone 7 месяцев назад +2

    Great review as always but would appreciate if the title said APS-C or Full Frame to easily find the relevant reviews :)

  • @nickdovos3897
    @nickdovos3897 7 месяцев назад +1

    I bought myself a ttartisant 27mm f2.8 autofocus on the Fujifilm X-M1, I really like it. nimble and sharp.

  • @countermaster7281
    @countermaster7281 3 месяца назад

    Great video brother, do you have review for the 35mm version of this?

  • @Durio_zibethinus
    @Durio_zibethinus 7 месяцев назад +1

    Reminds me about your recent viltrox video. Good work as usual 👏

  • @swistedfilms
    @swistedfilms 7 месяцев назад +1

    At that price you're getting a LOT of value. Kinda like the Canon Nifty Fifty.

  • @CocoKoi321
    @CocoKoi321 6 месяцев назад

    PLEASE DO A COMPARISON OF THIS AND THE 100$ YONGNUO 50MM

  • @thevanster8084
    @thevanster8084 6 месяцев назад

    Thanks for this review, Christopher

  • @Doct0r0710
    @Doct0r0710 7 месяцев назад +2

    Between this and the Viltrox f/1.7 it seems like the Viltrox is a bit better, but for some reason it's not available for Sony mounts. Also their 139USD price went up to 169USD, so it's not cheaper anymore.

    • @jazzgtrs1243
      @jazzgtrs1243 7 месяцев назад +1

      It’s on my Amazon “Wish List” and it’s still priced in the US at $139.00

    • @Doct0r0710
      @Doct0r0710 7 месяцев назад

      @@jazzgtrs1243 on their official store page went up to 169USD, and b&h photo has no stock left at 139USD. It could have been some introductory price or something, or maybe nothing

    • @Doct0r0710
      @Doct0r0710 7 месяцев назад

      @AaronFigueroa1 yes, for 2x the price.

  • @mikesrandomchannel
    @mikesrandomchannel 2 месяца назад

    This or the Yongnuo 50 mm is an interesting budget choice

  • @lionheart4424
    @lionheart4424 2 месяца назад

    This can be bought for about $129 USD when there are deals.
    Seems like a great deal for a portrait AF lens!

  • @echolaoful
    @echolaoful 7 месяцев назад +4

    Please help me Decide, TTartisan 56 vs Viltrox 1.7.. Please :)

    • @TJHartnett
      @TJHartnett 6 месяцев назад +2

      Viltrox, superior image quality in the corners and less focus breathing. Both perform great though and neither would disappoint.

    • @echolaoful
      @echolaoful 6 месяцев назад

      @@TJHartnett i did go the viltrox route already

  • @nageshj-v9w
    @nageshj-v9w 7 месяцев назад

    Hello Chris please do review on fuji 8-16 f2.8 please

  • @knalpotbocor168
    @knalpotbocor168 2 месяца назад

    Which one is you recommended for beginner TTartisan 56mm f1.8 or 35mm f1.8?

  • @AE-cu5zy
    @AE-cu5zy 6 месяцев назад

    If you could only keep p1 lens between this lens and the 7Artisans AF 50mm f/1.8, which would you pick and why? Thank you

  • @opalyankaBG
    @opalyankaBG 7 месяцев назад +3

    The Viltrox 56 1.7 seems to be quite better.

    • @CocoKoi321
      @CocoKoi321 6 месяцев назад

      Isn't that more expensive?
      Better comparison is the yongnuo

    • @opalyankaBG
      @opalyankaBG 6 месяцев назад

      @@CocoKoi321 no

  • @fifi_starr_vlogs
    @fifi_starr_vlogs 6 месяцев назад

    can i use it on fuji xa20?

  • @Caaamsilog
    @Caaamsilog 4 месяца назад

    Which one is sharper this or the 7artisans AF 50mil f1.8?

    • @SidGolan
      @SidGolan 2 месяца назад

      7artisans AF 50mm doesn't have an X mount (fujifilm x) version released yet. They only have Z/E versions.

  • @garethdwatkins
    @garethdwatkins 7 месяцев назад

    If it had had an aperture ring it would have been interesting with a Fuji camera, without it it's a deal breaker..shame..!!

  • @verzivull
    @verzivull 7 месяцев назад

    ugh, that viltrox lens destroyed everything on-site.

  • @lb_projekt
    @lb_projekt 7 месяцев назад

    Unfortunately the sigma is worst in flaring. It produces a rainbow when a ray of light comes into. It's become unusable

    • @Patrick-vi9xr
      @Patrick-vi9xr 7 месяцев назад

      Weird, because I never had such issues with my copy of 56mm sigma, lose of contrast yes, but seeing a flare is really rare.

  • @CristoforoBonissone
    @CristoforoBonissone 7 месяцев назад

    👍

  • @bradl2636
    @bradl2636 7 месяцев назад

    Not for video obviously

  • @RudiZimmerer
    @RudiZimmerer 2 месяца назад

    After all, I would never consider a lens that is so unsharp at the corners, this means it is sharp only in the center and that it is not getting significantly better with F5.6...

  • @noelopez3
    @noelopez3 7 месяцев назад

    Is this a crop-censored lens? I have a Sony 7r3.

    • @Simpaulme
      @Simpaulme 7 месяцев назад +3

      Crop yes - listen at 20 seconds in 😉

  • @Scyth3934
    @Scyth3934 7 месяцев назад

    Why wouldn't you just get a 50mm f1.8 for the same price? It would be full frame too!

    • @gregorybeale
      @gregorybeale 5 месяцев назад +1

      Well Fuji doesn't take full frame lenses so....

  • @blabler2533
    @blabler2533 5 месяцев назад

    Fujifilm cameras in general are never sharp because of the autofocus stuck on gen 1 dslrs