*SUBSCRIBE if you enjoy Battlefield related videos* Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/TBagGamingYT BIG Thanks to TmarTn for letting me use his footage: ruclips.net/user/TmarTn By the way I know it should be 'winchester 1897' and not '1997' :D
TBag [Epic Gaming Content] in think Battlefield 1 better than Call of duty because call of duty no have any idea to make new game sorry if english so bad
Egg Pickles also if you listen closely, when the magazine almost empty in bf1, you can hear the distinct noice from the mag, the noice of that last bullet in the mag. Oh and also if I'm not wrong you can also hear the firing sound with more depth or something when you ads in bf1
And it's very smooth in a way compared to modern warfare like I understand that the guns feel like real proper guns with strong recoil and stuff but there's a middle ground were it's smooth and realistic
I just played Bf1 multiplayer and WWII multiplayer back to back and what a night and day difference. BF1 has more photorealistic graphics, better immersion with explosions and the feeling of war being all around you, better maps, better teammates, much better gun sounds on my sound bar, and you just run into more people.
Honest opinion, the guns in COD sound like they recorded some gun sounds and just added some sort of synthetic bass to them, but battlefield sounds sounded as if they were recorded at a range. They sound authentic and they sound as if you are actually there in the war zone, like u can hear the echo and all that
i think its actually more accurate than in bf1.. shovels are heavy. and when you swing it around like that, it is exhausting, so yeah, yells are accurate, as well as heavy breathing, but not for the first few swings
The dev dep is a joke! Everyone should be fired asap! I am talking about COD of course. I think someone has had the philosophy for to long , Easy money!
True, I get the feeling like that some of the sounds are recycled, which really turned me off from the game, I get that sounds petty but for me if a game is going to have recycled sound effects for more then 2 guns then no thank you, apologize to anyone I may have offended, that is my honest opinion feel free to disagree Have a good day
Being super honest but the guns from Battlefield sound so soothing, and makes it sound as if you were there in real life. The echoes it gives off after every shot makes it sound and feel realistic.
They both have there pros and cons only thing I wish would change is the amount of online traffic between the two. BF should be getting more players but they don't because people who play COD play it just because it's "COD"
You cant deny Battlefield is the winner. The producers actually recorded the gun sounds of the actual gun. For the guns where they cant find it they just recreated it
Imperium Legio IX Gemina Exactly, I thought cod sounded more crisp and was clear, and it's not even out yet. Bf never really sounded that great to me for some reason, not the gun sound, explosions, callouts, etc.
Derp Derpington So your basing how good the game is off of the sounds of guns. I like to pay attention to graphics, and gameplay. Also, this was alpha gameplay theyre not done with the audio.
> You can't compare an already recycled politically-correct bullshit game with a successful almost god-tier game like Battlefield 1 CoD: WWII >supply drop system >more microtransactions >unhistorical censorship >more shitty business practices 11/-1 Definitely best franchise, would buy again
ASHANOMINAL There were like 3 or 4 black soldiers who actually were in the German military during ww1. That is nowhere near 1/5 of the entire military lmao. Just stop trying to deny it and just accept BF1 for what it is. It’s a politically correct shooting game that is no where near realistic, but still fun to play which is what Dice intended it to be hopefully.
Shut the fuck up U obviously haven’t been or seen the Call of Duty series over talking about bf1 being a god tier game stop fucking masterbating in the comments and do it behind close doors
Vault-tec Rep All guns in Battlefield 1 have bullet drop not just snipers and I forgot the name of what bullet drop in video games is called but I know cod uses hit scan.
Lol, people hating on both games, grow up and realise we're talkin about videogames. The BF franchise has always and will always be more realistic, and COD will and should always be more arcadish. People complaing that COD isnt realistic enough so BF is better, your opinion, you dont have to call COD players idiots. And COD players dont have to call BF players idiots either. Everyone grow up.
Will Dombrowski I was about to say the same fucking thing. You deserve more upvotes. Just a bunch of kids and manchilds arguing over videogames, lol what a bunch of losers.
There's a difference between graphics and animation. I think they both look amazing when it comes to graphics. But check how smooth BF1 looks, how the gun shakes when shooting and how smooth it looks. COD Looks good, but not as smooth as BF1. Check How the Lewis gun in bf1 looks hella smoother than the lewis gun un COD. But that's just my opinion.
Im Legit He's talking about the animation. For example, the gun movement in BF1 is 60fps while the gun movement in cod is more like 30fps. That's what he means by smooth.
Can I get 2 Subs? True.. i played the beta on x1 and recently seen it on the PC and big difference maybe because my friend has good specs on his PC but i really liked the PC version more than the console version ...
iTsJesusBruh PC is always better than consoles, especially the high-end ones. People must stop comparing pc to consoles because my PS4 looks equivalent to my 2012 PC.
Even if it were a variant, why would a 1997 model be in games from 1914-1945 Painfully stupid. He’s wrong, and can’t see that even if what he said was right, he’d still be wrong.
Cody Shultz the 1903a4 never had an offset scope, at least not a unertl scope which is what that is supposed to be. It also makes stripper clips impossible to use. And reply the video the scope isn't offset of the gun, it's like they was loading at an angle which again isn't possible
Were the graphics on high settings for CoD? This game looks king of ugly... And BTW, the sound design of Battelfield 1 is just PERFECT. The immersion is total. Seems like the CoD sound were taken in a studio and are not rendering great in open space. But CoD is an arcade and nervous game while BF 1 is more a kind of cinematic game. Almost 500, keep your efforts! :-)
Caleb Favela glad u ain't hopping onto the bo2 bandwagon. All these kids act like it is the best game ever but it just simply isn't. There is some stuff it did better then the first and some it didn't
Rogue CIA agent Poseidon Yeah your true but multiplayer is the important and just look at the graphics of WW2! BF1 has been launched 1 year ago and still better! And correct me if I'm wrong, The last 4 CODS have been total bullshit Compared to BF1(AW, Bo3, IW)
Except for the fact that the Lewis gun was used throughout the First World War, the BAR was used right at the end, and guns like the Helriegel weren't used even in the Second World War. I couldn't imagine any of the smgs in bf1 one being used in either, but there are photos of German soldiers holding the MP18 in WW1. The same with the medic rifles.
silent gamerX how is he a fanboy? Just saying the game is better doesn't mean he's a fanboy that shits on every FPS. Also don't talk shit with an anime profile picture
The Springfield reloading fail is an instant classic!!!!! (You couldn't reload a full clip because of the scope on the way and you had to reload one bullet at a time. In BF1 the scope is on the side, but in CoD the guy reloads through the scope)
That's not the only fail... If u reload half way like 3 rounds left in the rifle, the soldier just puts in a new 5 round clip and it magically becomes 5 in total instead of 8... How fucking dumb and lazy is that. CoD devs don't know shit about weapons in any way possible. Same old shit
"It's not finished yet" XD get real, we all know this watered down poorly made game is what we are going to see at launch. It's been the same every year. The same gameplay same graphics and it seems to me Cod is dying
Mistakes I can find in cod ww2 and bf1 but imagine cinemasins voice when reading this CoD: -Lewis gun thing behind the plate mag is the opposite way -even if m1911 magazine can be extended it would be 13-15 rounds not 9 -schnellfeuer m712 are rare and the rate of fire is too fast the entire magazine would be empty in split second -you cannot reload a stripper clip when a scope is in the way -Detachable magazine for the sniper rifles doesn't exist except for Lee Enfield, but it's not use for reloading and it's only for cleaning to avoid weapon jamming -3/5 *Still uses stripper clip to reload* -campaign might be iconic but what the heck is the point of adding Soviets, English,French, and Japanese weapon when there's only Germany and Americans -Normal Load outs is inaccurate -Mg42 is slow probably as slow as Mg34 it's big brother -PPsh only holds 56 rounds when in real life it hold 70-71 -most of these weapons are silent -Theres no thanks in cod ww2 when there's one in the campaign and more in WaW -HITMARKERS ARE LOUDER THAN EVERYTHING IN THAT GAME -M1 garand bolt usually closed by itself when the clip is inserted and there's some acception to reload it that way because the weapon is muddy or dirty - *when every weapon is mudded it goes away by it self* - silenced weapon is silent but the bullet is making all of the noise -Invisible walls -whats the point of having AT weapons when there's no tanks? -magazine fed shotgun doesn't exist in the past -physics aren't working properly - *why Chinese language when I open the game?* -why is there a Soviet weapons in the first mission? -Historical Accuracy is a little bit most of them are not accurate enough -only Soviet Russia recruits woman in ww2 or if you know some countries that do - Molotov is supposed to be a tactical but no they're adding it for kill streak instead BF: -Tanks are fast in real life it's slow -iron sights is weird -lewis gun magazine rotates very fast that you can only catch it in slow motion -some of these weapons aren't accurately placed in the right time -also your load outs is inaccurate for your faction - this time BLACK man in the battlefield people assume this game is racist but no -THESE WEAPONS ARE MASSIVE COMPARE TO REAL LIFE *Done* Now talk shit about me and be offended because these mistakes are real and you have to accept it and not defend it
bf1 wins based how it looked in the war for example the Lewis gun in ww2 always had the jacket on but in cod the jacket is off this is stupid because you will burn your hand and the fullauto c96 was uncontrollable without the buttstock in real life because its firerate of 900-1000 but in cod you can control it like it is nothing
Montagne He makes sense, the Lewis Gun witout the jacket is only used on aircraft, and Day of Infamy got it right with the full-auto C96 by having a stock.
The problem is that cod is still releasing this a year after their last game. Why not take 2 years and perfect it and redeem yourself. They're too money hungry.
DANK_GAMING If that's the case then they've done a piss poor job. I understand it's early but by this time you can pretty much tell what you're going to get.
Robertjr82 Call of Duty is made by three developers; Infinity Ward, Treyarch and Sledgehammer. They all take turns releasing one every year so they have more time to work on it. Making even a half decent game in a year is quite challenging.
LateNightGaming - Video Game News & Entertainment you are comparing a slow paced realistic ww1 fps to a fast paced arena style ww2 shooter. yeah, you are a fucking fanboy.
Nerag Swerop well thats what it is. a fast paced arena arcade shooter. where are you getting at with these arguments? if you look at the top of the comment section, i have a comment explaining why fanboys on both sides need to grow tf up so you seem to just be getting pissed off that im defending CoD. that's a fanboy move. "lol get real"
if COD was from devs that are doing hard job on putting new engine, that are learning everything from scratch yeah.. i would totaly agree with you.. however those COD dudes have same if not more experience in FPS games compared to DICE. and look what shitshow they have.. same engine for decade, graphics a little bit better so i can say there is tiny difference. dissapointed overall.. not to mention how old their engine is.. look at BF.. its true they need more time to release but damn they allmost always bring new frostbite engine with better preformance
You also don't realize how much time these developers put into a AAA game like this. Unlike the amount of work a shitty ass critic has to type a comment saying how devs are lazy BEFORE they even released their project to the public
Zyzz Mirin brah it's not the fact that it gets dark around you, when you focus you won't see the outside of your scope. That's what's happening when you hold your breath. Your moving your face closer to the inside of the scope
jerry78x the thing that made me a bit angry was the scope placement, you would have to load each bullet separate, you can't load a stripper clip in sideways
Cod ww2 will definetely destroy bf1, only if they dont copy paste it from battlefield though. You see, bf1 looks like a good game, but it really is a boring full priced game full of glitches, unreallistic af and completely unbalanced. That is the biggest problem, balance. In bf1 skill does not matter, what matters is who will first get into the light tank, and get on a solo 50 kill streak, while a highly skilled player using a one shot reload sniper will get a chest shot from one centimeter and only deal 97 dmg. If cod requires killstreaks for you to earn tanks, planes etc it will be a 10.000 times better version of bf1. If only dice took advise from visceral, and they made a proper pvp game.
Thotpatrol 69 its your choice, if you want, you can jump into a light tank and get a solo 57 kill streak, which is very easy to do. In cod, you need fast reflections and skill, all guns need skill, even explosives.
I cannot deny that COD always does a great job on there textures, their materials are always highly detailed, convincing looking and they have some of the best animators in the industry. But, the Frostbite engine rendering destroys the engine COD uses. And its basically no contest with Frostbites audio systems.
KillerRedVine agreed 100 percent. cod ww2 has also a good hip fire Base. what I mean with that is that aesthetically is could look better in what kind of position it's been held. for example, the m1903 in cod is being more on the view of the player which looks cooler in my opinion. where as in bf1 it's lower and looks maybe more realistic (actual hope fire) but less cool. but then you see cod putting in stripper clips through the scope and realise it's an unfinished product XD
I don't mind the look of the guns, rather the feeling they give. Nothing in Call of Duty feels heavy or powerful. The weapons look like toys because they animate like they weigh nothing.
Sebastian Ruble it's not all just about the quality, although both games look amazing, I love BF1 and it's graphics are good, I have also preordered WW2 and it's looks very good, I know that the recoil in WW2 does not look as good, but keep in mind, the game isn't yet finished.
LYŒN I can understand your other reasons but quality? for a game not to be based around quality already means it's gonna flop. if it's based around anything else other than quality, there will be little attention to detail and more attention on production. less attention to detail means lower quality which will make it less enjoyable.
Pooder Power yes, but it could also have a good campaign and all, remember old games, the graphic quality not the voices quality weren't as great, but we still enjoyed that. And I only said it's not only about the quality because there are other things than quality that make the game good.
the bf1 look and sound much better imo.....some of the cod guns look like toys and just don't look right..... the test range is dope tho and I wish bf1 had something like that....great video dude 👍 btw u put the shotgun as 1997 lol
Fuck I was waiting for someone to notice that, congrats you win XD yeah obviously it should be 1897 lol. But I agree with your statement, although it is pretty hard to do good against any battlefield game in this catagory ;)
TBag [Epic Gaming Content] yeah the frostbite engine is so good at the little details that for looks and sound it can't be beaten.....that test range tho 😮
BRO UR SAYING THAT COD GUNS LOOK LIKE TOYS WTF THE BAR FROM BT1 I WAS LIKE WHATS THIS MAYBE SOME ARE BETTER THAN OTHERS AND IN MY OPINION MOST OF THE GUNS FROM COD SOUND A LITTLE BIT BETTER BRO UR JUST A BT1 FANBOY .
I like to play both cod and bf. I never even considered them that much of the same type of game. Gameplay between the two are extremely different and i find that to be a good thing. If they were the then these arguments about "BF HAS THIS or COD HAS THAT " would actually make sense. When it comes to graphic, they are both good. visuals can be update and changed. For all we know the build that was used didn't show the full potential of WWII. So at the end of the day they are both great games "when its boots on ground cod", both with their own flaws.
Tobias Timm because the main goal of a beta or alpha is to get people hyped with the gameplay. I dont think the graphic will change all that much in the 3 months till release but in my opinion they are still good. As long as the game is good I don't care if the graphics are slightly worse or what not, as long as i have fun im good.
kevin i just watched a video about this gun, I'm pretty sure it has to do with the way the smoke is released out of the gun causing the muzzle flash to appear blue, sort of. Or I could be a glitch like the other person says
zeke geek what's to finish? Every call of duty is the same map with different textures, using 2013 graphics. Their maps are like 1/4th the size of battlefield 1's, yet they look SO HORRIBLE
Bester Mann boii if cod weaponds had guns that had bullet drop.recoli that feels real and well better graphics the real og players would still be playing cod. if there was only that perfect game oh wait thats bf
Battlefield 1 has more of a variation of sounds between the guns and also has more of a realistic recoil but I got to give Call of Duty some props for coming back from their fall in Infinite Warfare.
SpringSpyd3r Yeah........believe me i am an history buff and i wanted COD to go back to WW2, but after seeing how they treated history i was really disappointed. I was more hyped for Infinite Warfare than this. Not Joking.
nxios cod is still in Alpha, fucking dumbass 12 year old. The guns feel different, they may look somewhat similar, but if you know anything about history... or just common knowledge... the BAR from BF1 will almost look exactly like the COD WW2 version
Reminder that the game has been in development for 2 years and ot still looks like trash; pro-tip- quality never changes from the alpha to the release.
Gay Politician unless your playing watchdogs . the quality gets worse on release lol (;. either way I'm a bf fan all of them have been good I like a few cod games but there's a few I will never touch again like infinite . where as I'll play bf 2 again and again . and bc 1-2 . but cod games start to die every time a new one comes out . and the cod group and community are cancer for the most part . a bunch of bitching preeteens and pubescent teens . there are a few cool guys and girls that play cod but I find the bf community to be friendly for the most part . and not so self centered when it comes to the games . on cod it's always get rekt fggt and stuff at the end of a match but on bf it's usually go mate and getting messages saying that long shot was awesome man . I Donno I just wish cod could offer a bit more and not have to make up for there crappy games by adding zombies so people stick around lol . because bf doesn't need zombies for people to stick around .
That's every COD game except for last year's Modern Warfare. Every gun in the black ops cold war alpha felt identical. In WW2 some guns at least felt different. It was only cause Infinity Ward did some hardcore research for MW2019 that the guns feel any good.
StrapSlash stop, even if you think bf1 is better, you can't deny the graphics of world war 2 are good. And this was in June, graphics are even better now because the beta is out
Hauptsturmführer Müller I think reflex sights were invented by the time World War I was started, so it's not unlikely that they appeared in World War II.
*SUBSCRIBE if you enjoy Battlefield related videos*
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/TBagGamingYT
BIG Thanks to TmarTn for letting me use his footage: ruclips.net/user/TmarTn
By the way I know it should be 'winchester 1897' and not '1997'
:D
TBag [Epic Gaming Content] Mmm 3:03 1997? XD
Great vid btw 😉
Thats it! Im gonna put it in the comment that I made a mistake :P You're the second one to notice god dammit XD
TBag [Epic Gaming Content] glad to help! 😄
TBag [Epic Gaming Content] in think Battlefield 1 better than Call of duty because call of duty no have any idea to make new game sorry if english so bad
M1911 pistol extended mag is double the size but can only fit 2 more rounds?!
*_Top Ten Questions Science Still Can't Answer_*
Lol
*3
3
1903 Clip goes straight through scope?
Single stack mag would be the only answer but it ain't the case 😂
BAD DAY TO BE A HOUSE
Faier Fenix lol
Faier Fenix lmao good one ☝️
Faier Fenix fuck yo house
Faier Fenix or bad day to own that house.
house lives matter
COD: Recoil, What is that?
Crylec you are right
I think it's when your head moves up??? Ehh idk just put it in, **its not like anyone is gonna notice**
@@garfd cod fans: WhY aRe ThEsE gUnS gOiNg Up?!
Yeah just divert your attention from the fact that the M1911 in BF1 has about as much recoil as an Airsoft gun
ZipTie Garage You don't know shit about recoil my dude.
The new cod almost looks cartoonish to me
White Chocolate Wonder ya same here
Your stupid
Ut Fan *you’re
Taffy Tittes its a video game it’s basically a interactive cartoon stoopid
True, even black ops 4
2:46 WOW I didn't know you can load a sniper with a scope on it with a stripper clip...... oh wait you can't
Yeeeeeeet bf1 bois
Its at an angle
Hehehe Gehwer 98 sniper is quaking
@@blankblank5409 then it wouldn't load properly
LightBulb Man aaaah yes I don’t care if I clearly can only put bullet by bullet in the chamber meh I’ll just faze my thumb through the scope XD
Bf1 shovel: swing swoosh swang
CoD shovel: *YAAA RAAAAA YYAAAAAAAAA RRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA YRRAAAAAAA*
Egg Pickles also if you listen closely, when the magazine almost empty in bf1, you can hear the distinct noice from the mag, the noice of that last bullet in the mag. Oh and also if I'm not wrong you can also hear the firing sound with more depth or something when you ads in bf1
ha ha
Jk Ggezpz Yeah... EA and DICE made a big deal about the sound of the mag emptying when you fire...
Egg Pickles the game looks pretty ugly graphics wise
SKULLRAIDER If you mean BF1 look at some more footage of gameplay and you'll see it has some amazing graphics
BF1 has more realistic shooting
indeed
Of course it does
It feels more real
@@pck8276 yup
And it's very smooth in a way compared to modern warfare like I understand that the guns feel like real proper guns with strong recoil and stuff but there's a middle ground were it's smooth and realistic
I just played Bf1 multiplayer and WWII multiplayer back to back and what a night and day difference. BF1 has more photorealistic graphics, better immersion with explosions and the feeling of war being all around you, better maps, better teammates, much better gun sounds on my sound bar, and you just run into more people.
As a COD's fan, I think BF1 is better.
Cyber Scout respect... from a bf fan
Cyber Scout respect man 😄
No your a bf 1 fan tell the truth!!!!!
TheRealWarMech [FTL] salty cod fan boy
yeah me too
LOL cod really made some budget cuts in the graphics department
Bill Cipher theyll probably fix them in updates
Bill Cipher watch the campaign
Like they always do
Tweak215 who you calling an imbecile? Atleast BF1 became one of the greatest games in 2016, and is still better looking than cod.
Bill Cipher they made budget cuts in all departments
Honest opinion, the guns in COD sound like they recorded some gun sounds and just added some sort of synthetic bass to them, but battlefield sounds sounded as if they were recorded at a range. They sound authentic and they sound as if you are actually there in the war zone, like u can hear the echo and all that
Matthew Ledford they were
Matthew Ledford they really shot the guns to have the sound
They recorded with the authentic guns at range in cod waw... but that's another game
Matthew Ledford headass
TheFadingFiend you do realize people shoot guns at outside ranges, right?
Huh, didnt know shovels screamed.
Voldebutt bruh it’s legit in the history books
Frying paaaaaan
Hmmmmmmmmmm...
Aight lemme just use my shovel
AHH
YAHH
AHH YAH
AGHHHhh
i think its actually more accurate than in bf1.. shovels are heavy. and when you swing it around like that, it is exhausting, so yeah, yells are accurate, as well as heavy breathing, but not for the first few swings
Battlefield 1 is still better in every way lmao.
The dev dep is a joke! Everyone should be fired asap! I am talking about COD of course. I think someone has had the philosophy for to long , Easy money!
Both are unrealistic
Alexander Balesini yeh
Maybe in realism, but ww2 is the more fun game
GamerWind thank you for understanding what an opinion is. U have earned my respect good sir, bf1 isnt bad, just cod fits my playstyle more 😁
2:57
The fuck? Thats not even physically possible! The scope would block the full clip from going through!
good eyes
And there were still bullets in the sniper, so he should have put them 1 by 1 anyway
Just because you are playing with LEGOs every day , doesn't mean it is not physically possible , oh it fucking is
+Nofear-SoUlZ
Why cant you accept it when cod doesnt win every aspect, if they spent more time developing they might be as realistic
Alex de Boer
Cod doesnt win in any aspect. All the newer cods are pretty much mediocre.
Geez you must really hate the house
Derpo Sawr lol made my day xD
Derpo Sawr lol good one!!
Derpo Sawr lol good one!!
Derpo Sawr Forrest Gump alternate scene.
Derpo Sawr Old joke.
How to destroy a house : part 1
tobby theedgehogue hahahah genius
tobby theedgehogue agreed
Me: Easy, gets in the driver seat of a landship then proceeds to destroy the house
both cool but bf1 cooler
Meso Sweet yeah the physics are better in battlefield 1 compared to ww2
2:24
Ummm....
Wont the scope block the stripper clip?!
IR0N AUSS13 I think you meant for ww2 right?
IR0N AUSS13 yes in cod it does
Yeah, but U KNOW, ITS FUCKING COD
Cod : not today boii
Infact...
Am going to be honest BattleField 1 wins...
Very true they spent a lot of time on the sounds call of duty doesn’t even sound anything like some of them
Alex Monterrosa agreed
SO TRUE! BF1's my favorite FPS.
@@tatetumbles Mine, too
*I’m
i have played both games and i can say that battlefiled its much better
The final Chanell me too
Also the lewis mag did not spin like a fidget spinner
3:25
Winchester 1997? Man, didn‘t know WW2 was still around back then.
They should have called it cod ww3 (the same war but with modern guns)
@@barrelsofwaste7658 I don’t think that would be a good game,it’s probably because I don’t like modern guns than much.
@@evanrush1082 its cod they suck at making anything new so it might happen
@@evanrush1082 I dont think anyone asked
@@barrelsofwaste7658 Wow. I guess you have been under a rock for two years in a row.
the springfield animation in Call of Duty is just plain wrong
Agent Bill Wilson IKR it's like here let me load this 5 round clip into a Springfield
springfield m1903, that's what it is. you're either blind or stupid, most likely both
"It's not a Springfield"
Please, consider year round schooling, whatever it is you're doing clearly isn't working.
Empiire Fluxii Springfield is a brand like Walmart you jack fuck there are springfields made in the 1800's and 1900's as well as today.
Empiire Fluxii i didn't know ppl could get any dumber
Like for battlefield 1
battlefield did something call of duty could not do ....... PUT THERE SCOPES ON THE SIDE OF THE RIFLE SO YOU CAN PUT IN THE STRIPPER CLIP IN CORRECTLY
Says the person that plays club penguin and Roblox
Battlefield has actual weapons that are from the time period we're call of duty copied some of them and battlefield has detail
Scum bag
Imagine baiting for likes on your RUclips comment. Pathetic.
The guns in cod ww2 look really thin...
*All* of the CoD guns sound like slamming a small bag filled with sand or mud against a wall lmao
True, I get the feeling like that some of the sounds are recycled, which really turned me off from the game, I get that sounds petty but for me if a game is going to have recycled sound effects for more then 2 guns then no thank you, apologize to anyone I may have offended, that is my honest opinion feel free to disagree
Have a good day
DoubleSloth Gaming ik I’m 8 months late but I totally agree
If the gun doesn’t sound satisfying, it takes away about 30% of the experience for me
@@jblazerndrowzy completely agree! What's the point of recreating iconic weapons if they're aren't going to do it well?
exactly XD
And after Cod modern WARFARE being released
Battelfield gun sounds are trashed
Being super honest but the guns from Battlefield sound so soothing, and makes it sound as if you were there in real life. The echoes it gives off after every shot makes it sound and feel realistic.
Cristian Rayas wtf man wtf did you just say the guns are to fuking loud in real life
the Winner is BATTLEFIELD 1
For sure
The screaming in the end is cod being mad that it lost and then proceeding to destroy the range with a shovel to express it's anger
They both have there pros and cons only thing I wish would change is the amount of online traffic between the two. BF should be getting more players but they don't because people who play COD play it just because it's "COD"
that's true and also if you talk trash about cod or battle field you gonna end up playing them both at sometime
and fun you forgot fun.
true
You cant deny Battlefield is the winner. The producers actually recorded the gun sounds of the actual gun. For the guns where they cant find it they just recreated it
Derp Derpington for cod they dp the same but we can't juge a game when it's not at the alpha version !
Imperium Legio IX Gemina Exactly, I thought cod sounded more crisp and was clear, and it's not even out yet. Bf never really sounded that great to me for some reason, not the gun sound, explosions, callouts, etc.
Imperium Legio IX Gemina I'm not exactly a fan of cod but can't argue that point
Derp Derpington So your basing how good the game is off of the sounds of guns. I like to pay attention to graphics, and gameplay. Also, this was alpha gameplay theyre not done with the audio.
HOGG Well then, that's a bit odd
that screaming when using the shovel will piss me off ingame
Its like a elite class in bf1 lol
Luca Guida Autistic screeching is important to COD 😂
XxGunner_ 317xX reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.................................................
XxGunner_ 317xX Indeed, it's a hat tip to their demograph
Luca Guida imagine you are doing a stealth mission on bf1 with that cod reaction
battlefield 1 guns are so satisfying
thats funny because ive been unsatisfied since the beta.
Who ever said he still plays bf1
I'm about to go play it now actually lol.. most of the guns do blow though
ah yes, there's nothing more satisfying than that red hit hit marker sound after sniping someone with the martini henry
Affan Syed yea right
that BF1 Shovel , so satisfying 😍
> You can't compare an already recycled politically-correct bullshit game with a successful almost god-tier game like Battlefield 1
CoD: WWII
>supply drop system
>more microtransactions
>unhistorical censorship
>more shitty business practices
11/-1 Definitely best franchise, would buy again
Le HippieVibe 😂 so true
Bruh bf1 isn’t a god tier game
Because black soldiers on every side are not "politically correct" in bf1. Having said that bf1 is amazing.
ASHANOMINAL There were like 3 or 4 black soldiers who actually were in the German military during ww1. That is nowhere near 1/5 of the entire military lmao. Just stop trying to deny it and just accept BF1 for what it is. It’s a politically correct shooting game that is no where near realistic, but still fun to play which is what Dice intended it to be hopefully.
Shut the fuck up
U obviously haven’t been or seen the Call of Duty series over talking about bf1 being a god tier game stop fucking masterbating in the comments and do it behind close doors
Winchester is 1897,not 1997.
Pablo-Dg3Jz like cod graphics
vinvinudu77 XD
vinvinudu77 t méchant
Pablo-Dg3Jz I thought I was the only one who noticed lmao
As a COD fan BF1 was definitely better, so good that wind blowing effect in BF1
Oliver Chraizy and the fact that snipers have bullet drop
Vault-tec Rep All guns in Battlefield 1 have bullet drop not just snipers and I forgot the name of what bullet drop in video games is called but I know cod uses hit scan.
SuperGodzilla 56 Yeah i know
No it wasn't dumbass. You probably never played cod
Im Legit look at were he reloads a full fucking clip on the m1903 in cod through the fucking scope
Bf 1 is better like if agree
Josh Allen strange how this has over 100 likes but no backlash from cod fans, but I agree I love bf1
Josh Allen Thats just like l would say "Like if you are breathing"
Mcfch no u
Yeah
404 like not found
It’s a joke because you got 404 likes
4:06 Now if those ain't some extended mags, I don't know what is.
Chayse Poikea that's so stupid. That extended mag should hold at least 15 bullets
Chayse Poikea those aren't extended mags they were simply a rest for the hands of soldiers and some found it comfortable
battlefield 1 rules! (my opinion)
Omar Enrique fact*
Omar Enrique COD*
think about it No.
AleXtreme anyway it's your opinion man
All of these cod kids mad😂😂😂
Which Machine gun did the Germans use in WW2?
MG42 or MG34
Thats right kiddo the MG15
Crackergaming You must be really fun at parties...
Lintao Klepach I was hoping for a good game.
They took my toys...
... So I took their lives
Crackergaming it was both
Crackergaming MG42 will be in the full game. The MG15 was used a little bit as well.
Crackergaming mg15
BF1 is more fun than cod
they're completely different tho
It depends on play style
@@idkagoodnamesorryidoubtyou6191 yes
Mw: are you sure about that
L. A. Bautista in*
Lol, people hating on both games, grow up and realise we're talkin about videogames. The BF franchise has always and will always be more realistic, and COD will and should always be more arcadish. People complaing that COD isnt realistic enough so BF is better, your opinion, you dont have to call COD players idiots. And COD players dont have to call BF players idiots either. Everyone grow up.
Couldn't agree more. Literally have nothing more to add because you said it perfectly.
Will Dombrowski there we go finally someone
Will Dombrowski You are 100% right.
Will Dombrowski True. But uh...welcome to the internet.
Will Dombrowski I was about to say the same fucking thing. You deserve more upvotes. Just a bunch of kids and manchilds arguing over videogames, lol what a bunch of losers.
There's a difference between graphics and animation. I think they both look amazing when it comes to graphics. But check how smooth BF1 looks, how the gun shakes when shooting and how smooth it looks. COD Looks good, but not as smooth as BF1.
Check How the Lewis gun in bf1 looks hella smoother than the lewis gun un COD.
But that's just my opinion.
Alejandro McAnally it has more recoil in cod hip firing than on bf1 and it is an heavy weapon so its not mean to feel smooth like the fal from mw2
Alejandro McAnally guns aren't supposed to be smooth to use
Grim Gamers he means animation
Guns aren't suppose to be smooth dumbass
Im Legit He's talking about the animation. For example, the gun movement in BF1 is 60fps while the gun movement in cod is more like 30fps. That's what he means by smooth.
Haven't played BF1 nor WW2 .. both games have decent graphics but the BF1 look more realistic
it is
I have bf1 it's amazing
iTsJesusBruh But once again, cod will always be the champion when it comes to the sales war.
Can I get 2 Subs? True.. i played the beta on x1 and recently seen it on the PC and big difference maybe because my friend has good specs on his PC but i really liked the PC version more than the console version ...
iTsJesusBruh PC is always better than consoles, especially the high-end ones. People must stop comparing pc to consoles because my PS4 looks equivalent to my 2012 PC.
I feel bad for whoever lives in that house
3:15 its Winchester 1897 not 1997
RedMaximus That's not a variation, it's just typed wrong
RedMaximus
You must be a liberal
Even if it were a variant, why would a 1997 model be in games from 1914-1945
Painfully stupid. He’s wrong, and can’t see that even if what he said was right, he’d still be wrong.
Bf1 Random clips mistakes happen
How the fuck do you use a stripper clip in the 1903 if there's a scope?!?!😂
Cole Avison you don't Call of Duty World War 2 is trash don't buy it it's garbage
Cole Avison 1903?
Scope is offset. Just like the M1D.
Cody Shultz the 1903a4 never had an offset scope, at least not a unertl scope which is what that is supposed to be. It also makes stripper clips impossible to use.
And reply the video the scope isn't offset of the gun, it's like they was loading at an angle which again isn't possible
budget gamer2017 Your right, I did some more research and saw that. I concede good sir.
Were the graphics on high settings for CoD? This game looks king of ugly...
And BTW, the sound design of Battelfield 1 is just PERFECT. The immersion is total.
Seems like the CoD sound were taken in a studio and are not rendering great in open space.
But CoD is an arcade and nervous game while BF 1 is more a kind of cinematic game.
Almost 500, keep your efforts! :-)
TheAlexitou very true. exactly what you say. battlefield is always amazing in so8nd design! and thanks man, couple more weeks I hope :D
TBag [Epic Gaming Content] like I said before your growing fast I know you'll hit 500
TheAlexitou well, both games took time to come out and maybe cod might look a bit like bf4
The Game Is Still Beta Not Fully Realese Thats Why The Graphics Looks Ugly
Aris_Walker511 graphics don't really change from beta - still the same game engine when it will be released
Call of Duty run out of ideas 😂 BF1 takes my heart. The last great game of CoD was MW3
Caleb Favela glad u ain't hopping onto the bo2 bandwagon. All these kids act like it is the best game ever but it just simply isn't. There is some stuff it did better then the first and some it didn't
Caleb Favela so trie
Haha, mw3 was a failure, the best Call of dutys are the really old ones like Call of duty 2
WaW was the last good CoD game. The rest was just...dogshit.
I'd say mw2
I see COD is still sticking with them future weapons, Winchester 1997
Stunners32 *1897
Minor mistake
This was actually funny lol
I love COD but battlefield 1 vs COD battlefield wins
titansgaming123 cod is screwed. only MW series and Bo1-2 were good
xPredator325 the originals are the best
titansgaming123 battlefield has the worst actors that never won any award do yoy research before sayinh who wins
Rogue CIA agent Poseidon Yeah your true but multiplayer is the important and just look at the graphics of WW2! BF1 has been launched 1 year ago and still better! And correct me if I'm wrong, The last 4 CODS have been total bullshit Compared to BF1(AW, Bo3, IW)
Rogue CIA agent Poseidon battlefield 1 won, doesn't matter about awards
COD is more of an arcade kind of game, as for battlefield it is really trying to get the immersion that you're in the fight.
Battlefield is a arcade mod with vehicles for call of duty
please dude play red orchestra 2
Mysterious Stranger I didnt feel like I was in a fight... dafuq.... I just kept getting sniped from a distance..
except for the fact that the weapons in bf1 are only really used in ww2 and not ww1
Mysterious Stranger yes bro
Except for the fact that the Lewis gun was used throughout the First World War, the BAR was used right at the end, and guns like the Helriegel weren't used even in the Second World War. I couldn't imagine any of the smgs in bf1 one being used in either, but there are photos of German soldiers holding the MP18 in WW1. The same with the medic rifles.
Bf 1 is still better
Daniel Hudson no
Daniel Hudson yep
silent gamerX how is he a fanboy? Just saying the game is better doesn't mean he's a fanboy that shits on every FPS. Also don't talk shit with an anime profile picture
silent gamerX yup
Shamrock well, bf 1 is honestly better, and ya, I'll admit I'm a fanboy, cod... not my type of games.
5:37 i laughed so hard for a moment i thouged i was in skyrim
The Springfield reloading fail is an instant classic!!!!! (You couldn't reload a full clip because of the scope on the way and you had to reload one bullet at a time. In BF1 the scope is on the side, but in CoD the guy reloads through the scope)
It's reloaded at an angle, it DOESN'T go through the scope.
D3AL1O Either way, you can't load a strip clip into the Springfield in an angle.
D3AL1O If the scope is straight above the magazine than how do you load a straight clip into it?
PrimarisGeneseedIsHeresy u call that HAX!
That's not the only fail... If u reload half way like 3 rounds left in the rifle, the soldier just puts in a new 5 round clip and it magically becomes 5 in total instead of 8... How fucking dumb and lazy is that. CoD devs don't know shit about weapons in any way possible. Same old shit
I tried to reload springfield the same way.
*I almost broke my scope*
LOL
That shotgun reload at 3:35 sounds like a dog licking peanut butter off the roof of its mouth.
xD LMAO
lols
William Moon XD
Lmfao it actualy does 😂😂
William Moon It's weird and funny XD
Im fan of COD but BF is really good.
K.N wwii not finished yet
Phillip Edmond İ know. But im playey BF and its good.
"It's not finished yet" XD get real, we all know this watered down poorly made game is what we are going to see at launch. It's been the same every year. The same gameplay same graphics and it seems to me Cod is dying
TROLLSTIN13
Look at the sales figures...cod is far from dying.
TROLLSTIN13 İ agree with you
Battlefield is honestly better
Mercenary Peacemaker ok
Mercenary Peacemaker Bolji je battlefield 1 ! MNOGO BOLJI.
Yea but cod ww2 is getting shit for not being historically accurate while bf1 is just as bad lol
Avery Gallup but bf1 is not a shit game
but it is... running in that game makes me dizzy with the way its over exaggerated af
Mistakes I can find in cod ww2 and bf1 but imagine cinemasins voice when reading this
CoD:
-Lewis gun thing behind the plate mag is the opposite way
-even if m1911 magazine can be extended it would be 13-15 rounds not 9
-schnellfeuer m712 are rare and the rate of fire is too fast the entire magazine would be empty in split second
-you cannot reload a stripper clip when a scope is in the way
-Detachable magazine for the sniper rifles doesn't exist except for Lee Enfield, but it's not use for reloading and it's only for cleaning to avoid weapon jamming
-3/5 *Still uses stripper clip to reload*
-campaign might be iconic but what the heck is the point of adding Soviets, English,French, and Japanese weapon when there's only Germany and Americans
-Normal Load outs is inaccurate
-Mg42 is slow probably as slow as Mg34 it's big brother
-PPsh only holds 56 rounds when in real life it hold 70-71
-most of these weapons are silent
-Theres no thanks in cod ww2 when there's one in the campaign and more in WaW
-HITMARKERS ARE LOUDER THAN EVERYTHING IN THAT GAME
-M1 garand bolt usually closed by itself when the clip is inserted and there's some acception to reload it that way because the weapon is muddy or dirty
- *when every weapon is mudded it goes away by it self*
- silenced weapon is silent but the bullet is making all of the noise
-Invisible walls
-whats the point of having AT weapons when there's no tanks?
-magazine fed shotgun doesn't exist in the past
-physics aren't working properly
- *why Chinese language when I open the game?*
-why is there a Soviet weapons in the first mission?
-Historical Accuracy is a little bit most of them are not accurate enough
-only Soviet Russia recruits woman in ww2 or if you know some countries that do
- Molotov is supposed to be a tactical but no they're adding it for kill streak instead
BF:
-Tanks are fast in real life it's slow
-iron sights is weird
-lewis gun magazine rotates very fast that you can only catch it in slow motion
-some of these weapons aren't accurately placed in the right time
-also your load outs is inaccurate for your faction
- this time BLACK man in the battlefield people assume this game is racist but no
-THESE WEAPONS ARE MASSIVE COMPARE TO REAL LIFE
*Done*
Now talk shit about me and be offended because these mistakes are real and you have to accept it and not defend it
Now find the mistakes you can find in this comment
What game do you think is better
I guess call of duty made the same mistake again
Red Hex NO THEY DIDNT
Boi 420 69 Yes they did, it's still boring. again.
Lol then you play on PC with 100 fps the. Realise ww2 is better
Dan006 d00d same
@@danscrsus Are you kidding me? Why would anyone pick real life? I prefer 2D and it would be much better.
Battlefield 1 has a more realistic feel to it
I bet u dont remember this comment at all lol
@@CatsAreKindaCooli don’t think you remember this either
How the hell do you load a clip into a Springfield when the scope is covering the chamber.
CripTik Storm he goes through the scope...
CripTik Storm tf
CripTik Storm thought the exact same thing
CripTik Storm probably u put the magazine or clip at the side
CripTik Storm EXACTLY
Cod: hey google why is my shovel screaming?
Bf1 won by a long shot
Cod won
Jake Yohn their both great games
It doest matter if you dont like a game people will still like it ok, I play both I have fun with both of them
Jyohn250 you are fucking stupid, they are both shit.
bf1 wins based how it looked in the war for example the Lewis gun in ww2 always had the jacket on but in cod the jacket is off this is stupid because you will burn your hand and the fullauto c96 was uncontrollable without the buttstock in real life because its firerate of 900-1000 but in cod you can control it like it is nothing
You make no sense.
Montagne how does he make no sense?
Montagne He makes sense, the Lewis Gun witout the jacket is only used on aircraft, and Day of Infamy got it right with the full-auto C96 by having a stock.
in cod they also got the model of the m712 (fullauto c96) wrong because the fire selector switch is missing
BloodSteelGaming no one rlly care since its not supposed to be realistic
As a major CoD fan. Battlefield easily takes the cake.
NiNja Animations The game is not finished yet
I think this is the first tbag video I ever watched. He's come a long way now.
I've become accustomed to gun sounds in bf1 that anything else sounds wrong
The problem is that cod is still releasing this a year after their last game. Why not take 2 years and perfect it and redeem yourself. They're too money hungry.
Robertjr82 every year one developer does a game its not just one there's treyarch, infinity ward, and sledgehammer they cant take their time
you’re kidding right. WW2 has been in development for 3 years, not 1 year...
DANK_GAMING If that's the case then they've done a piss poor job. I understand it's early but by this time you can pretty much tell what you're going to get.
i just hope the gameplay wont be as fucking boring as bf1
Robertjr82 Call of Duty is made by three developers; Infinity Ward, Treyarch and Sledgehammer. They all take turns releasing one every year so they have more time to work on it. Making even a half decent game in a year is quite challenging.
BF1 wins hands down.
robdee81 Whatever BF1 fanboy
Javier Ortega aaaaand a CoD fan thinkibg CoD is even good
Javier Ortega lolol "I can't refute those facts so... LOLOL BF1 FANBOY"
LateNightGaming - Video Game News & Entertainment you are comparing a slow paced realistic ww1 fps to a fast paced arena style ww2 shooter. yeah, you are a fucking fanboy.
Nerag Swerop well thats what it is. a fast paced arena arcade shooter. where are you getting at with these arguments? if you look at the top of the comment section, i have a comment explaining why fanboys on both sides need to grow tf up so you seem to just be getting pissed off that im defending CoD. that's a fanboy move. "lol get real"
3:00 love the Winchester *”1997”*
I know that I am gonna get vaporized for saying this, but here goes nothing.
In my opinion...
both games look fine...
hey its not your fault for being vaporized and your right both games do look great
Gregthegamer I expected major feedback ?
if COD was from devs that are doing hard job on putting new engine, that are learning everything from scratch yeah.. i would totaly agree with you.. however those COD dudes have same if not more experience in FPS games compared to DICE. and look what shitshow they have.. same engine for decade, graphics a little bit better so i can say there is tiny difference. dissapointed overall.. not to mention how old their engine is.. look at BF.. its true they need more time to release but damn they allmost always bring new frostbite engine with better preformance
You also don't realize how much time these developers put into a AAA game like this. Unlike the amount of work a shitty ass critic has to type a comment saying how devs are lazy BEFORE they even released their project to the public
I love you man...
Bf1 all the way, but you guys gotta admit: WWII's snipers breath holding is legit really cool.
jerry78x
In the Bf1 campaigns you could do the absolute miracle of holding your breath in
Squishy Potato Power It doesn't silence the music or the background noise. As well as give tunnel vision, which just makes it cooler.
well its not something outstanding imo. just a feature.
Zyzz Mirin brah it's not the fact that it gets dark around you, when you focus you won't see the outside of your scope. That's what's happening when you hold your breath. Your moving your face closer to the inside of the scope
jerry78x the thing that made me a bit angry was the scope placement, you would have to load each bullet separate, you can't load a stripper clip in sideways
4:33 just look at that chamber flooping 😂😂😂
Pepsi Adictionz yes that's that a luger did that's just like saying hey haha a gun ejects a empty round😂
Pepsi Adictionz i know, it looks like shit, ive seen better graphics from pacman
BadKarmaComes he was just making a joke
just because someone was telling a joke doesn't mean you have to be an ass about it
02:46 Call of Duty reloading logic!!!
soory cod fans but truly battlefield 1 wins hats off!!*
Prabhdeep Singh no fucking shit
Prabhdeep Singh No shit Sherlock
Cod ww2 will definetely destroy bf1, only if they dont copy paste it from battlefield though. You see, bf1 looks like a good game, but it really is a boring full priced game full of glitches, unreallistic af and completely unbalanced. That is the biggest problem, balance. In bf1 skill does not matter, what matters is who will first get into the light tank, and get on a solo 50 kill streak, while a highly skilled player using a one shot reload sniper will get a chest shot from one centimeter and only deal 97 dmg. If cod requires killstreaks for you to earn tanks, planes etc it will be a 10.000 times better version of bf1. If only dice took advise from visceral, and they made a proper pvp game.
The Greek HIJACKER not when you have anti-tank grenades and use some fucking teamwork
Thotpatrol 69 its your choice, if you want, you can jump into a light tank and get a solo 57 kill streak, which is very easy to do. In cod, you need fast reflections and skill, all guns need skill, even explosives.
battlefield has that distinct sound
of garbage, unless your talking BadCompany2 then your talking about Goku level of awsome. (infinite)
Hellfire0220 what?
Am i the only one who thinks COD WW2 looks cartoon-ish? 😂😂
Wake Nope, for a 2017 release its looks about as good as something that came out in 2010, bit pathetic really but hey classic COD honestly
Wake WW2 is colorful epsically in a war area which shouldn't look like that but it's fine though.
Republic 117 yeah... But what i mean is that it's got like... Outlining..
yeah
100% agree.. It does look cartoonish. BF1 all the way!
What is the video in the background for your outro? It looks cool
I cannot deny that COD always does a great job on there textures, their materials are always highly detailed, convincing looking and they have some of the best animators in the industry. But, the Frostbite engine rendering destroys the engine COD uses. And its basically no contest with Frostbites audio systems.
KillerRedVine agreed 100 percent. cod ww2 has also a good hip fire Base. what I mean with that is that aesthetically is could look better in what kind of position it's been held. for example, the m1903 in cod is being more on the view of the player which looks cooler in my opinion. where as in bf1 it's lower and looks maybe more realistic (actual hope fire) but less cool. but then you see cod putting in stripper clips through the scope and realise it's an unfinished product XD
KillerRedVine we don't need a frostbite engine for a game to look good
which is why i dont get why they dont use the m1903 model from the campaign which is held like other snipers
the map assets are great but some of the guns here looked quite poor
I don't mind the look of the guns, rather the feeling they give. Nothing in Call of Duty feels heavy or powerful. The weapons look like toys because they animate like they weigh nothing.
BF1 wins, quality is much higher
Sebastian Ruble it's not all just about the quality, although both games look amazing, I love BF1 and it's graphics are good, I have also preordered WW2 and it's looks very good, I know that the recoil in WW2 does not look as good, but keep in mind, the game isn't yet finished.
LYŒN I can understand your other reasons but quality? for a game not to be based around quality already means it's gonna flop. if it's based around anything else other than quality, there will be little attention to detail and more attention on production. less attention to detail means lower quality which will make it less enjoyable.
LYŒN because of ppl like you who preorder games like that after a CoD IW is because we still got this activision AC like ass games every year.
Sebastian Ruble I wonder why! Oh, maybe because WWII Isn't even in beta yet! Wow!
Pooder Power yes, but it could also have a good campaign and all, remember old games, the graphic quality not the voices quality weren't as great, but we still enjoyed that. And I only said it's not only about the quality because there are other things than quality that make the game good.
Never knew that WW2 Graphics look worse than WW1 Graphics.
Fuhrer Parodies are you trying to find a reason to hate the game.
All of cod ww2 fanboys are expecting the updates to fix everything
the bf1 look and sound much better imo.....some of the cod guns look like toys and just don't look right..... the test range is dope tho and I wish bf1 had something like that....great video dude 👍 btw u put the shotgun as 1997 lol
Fuck I was waiting for someone to notice that, congrats you win XD yeah obviously it should be 1897 lol. But I agree with your statement, although it is pretty hard to do good against any battlefield game in this catagory ;)
TBag [Epic Gaming Content]
yeah the frostbite engine is so good at the little details that for looks and sound it can't be beaten.....that test range tho 😮
tizza_ BF1TV true. back in bf4 we had a test range. for some reason it's not in bf1?
BRO UR SAYING THAT COD GUNS LOOK LIKE TOYS WTF THE BAR FROM BT1 I WAS LIKE WHATS THIS MAYBE SOME ARE BETTER THAN OTHERS AND IN MY OPINION MOST OF THE GUNS FROM COD SOUND A LITTLE BIT BETTER BRO UR JUST A BT1 FANBOY .
Cristofer Carrasco I like both games , but I'd say battlefield has a more realistic feel when it has to do with guns and graphics
I like to play both cod and bf. I never even considered them that much of the same type of game. Gameplay between the two are extremely different and i find that to be a good thing. If they were the then these arguments about "BF HAS THIS or COD HAS THAT " would actually make sense. When it comes to graphic, they are both good. visuals can be update and changed. For all we know the build that was used didn't show the full potential of WWII. So at the end of the day they are both great games "when its boots on ground cod", both with their own flaws.
MV Shadowz When its used on a demo for the E3, why should you use the version with less good graphics?
Tobias Timm because the main goal of a beta or alpha is to get people hyped with the gameplay. I dont think the graphic will change all that much in the 3 months till release but in my opinion they are still good. As long as the game is good I don't care if the graphics are slightly worse or what not, as long as i have fun im good.
Why is the Cod trenchgun muzzle flash blue?
It's probably something to do with the lighting. Or it might be a bug.
The game is still kinda work in progress......
kevin i just watched a video about this gun, I'm pretty sure it has to do with the way the smoke is released out of the gun causing the muzzle flash to appear blue, sort of. Or I could be a glitch like the other person says
kevin could be beacause the game is in alpha.
I think it's because the shells are hitting the metal plates on the firing range, which makes it a bluish color
Battlefield is has more choas and more realistic, bigger maps, with more people, you can ride horses and tanks and other vehicle's. I love BF1
BF1's gun sounds have a more crisper sound to them. While CoD WWII's guns sound louder. At least within this video.
The cod sounds are dull, They have no umph. While battlefield sounds like your shooting something powerful, and it has the echo of the shots as well.
PnutButterNLadys It's the f***in alpha shut the hell up about audio.
Battlefield sound design is simply on another level, love it.
Nigel cod isn't even finished
zeke geek what's to finish? Every call of duty is the same map with different textures, using 2013 graphics. Their maps are like 1/4th the size of battlefield 1's, yet they look SO HORRIBLE
for people who think cod is more realistic i hope u know what recoil is
And Medal of Honor Warfighter has hell a lot of it.
and battlefield has nullet drop as well looks like cod spends 6 months in dev while BF is like 18 months
Like those bf guns had any recoil, don't fool yourself there fella
Bester Mann good try but i think u missed the footage of the lewis gun and the m1911
Bester Mann boii if cod weaponds had guns that had bullet drop.recoli that feels real and well better graphics the real og players would still be playing cod. if there was only that perfect game oh wait thats bf
2 mill views that’s so nice to see for a RUclips who deserves 2 mill subs I feel that tbag is so underrated
That BAR for bf1 is so Thicc and sexy (holy shit my comment had gotten like 181 likes)
The storm variant is the best
It's the god gun
+Kid from Africa youre*
You're*
AstroPictures Yeah
Battlefield 1 has more of a variation of sounds between the guns and also has more of a realistic recoil but I got to give Call of Duty some props for coming back from their fall in Infinite Warfare.
SpringSpyd3r Yeah........believe me i am an history buff and i wanted COD to go back to WW2, but after seeing how they treated history i was really disappointed. I was more hyped for Infinite Warfare than this. Not Joking.
SpringSpyd3r
Props for what? They had no other chance than revealing a boots on the ground cod.
Nice Profile Avatar
SpringSpyd3r all the guns in BF1 sounded the exact same to me, while the CoD ones all sounded different
infinity ward and sledgehammer are the ass companies that make shit games, treyarch is the good shit
wow no comparison, Battlefield 1 is clearly the winner.
Hazard Elite. they ain't fixing shit you and me both know that.
Hazard Elite. They were making ww2 game for two years. fuck out here
nxios cod is still in Alpha, fucking dumbass 12 year old. The guns feel different, they may look somewhat similar, but if you know anything about history... or just common knowledge... the BAR from BF1 will almost look exactly like the COD WW2 version
Reminder that the game has been in development for 2 years and ot still looks like trash; pro-tip-
quality never changes from the alpha to the release.
Gay Politician unless your playing watchdogs . the quality gets worse on release lol (;. either way I'm a bf fan all of them have been good I like a few cod games but there's a few I will never touch again like infinite . where as I'll play bf 2 again and again . and bc 1-2 . but cod games start to die every time a new one comes out . and the cod group and community are cancer for the most part . a bunch of bitching preeteens and pubescent teens . there are a few cool guys and girls that play cod but I find the bf community to be friendly for the most part . and not so self centered when it comes to the games . on cod it's always get rekt fggt and stuff at the end of a match but on bf it's usually go mate and getting messages saying that long shot was awesome man . I Donno I just wish cod could offer a bit more and not have to make up for there crappy games by adding zombies so people stick around lol . because bf doesn't need zombies for people to stick around .
Why is there no recoil in CoD, were the developers like "let's make them feel like nerf guns"
That's every COD game except for last year's Modern Warfare. Every gun in the black ops cold war alpha felt identical. In WW2 some guns at least felt different. It was only cause Infinity Ward did some hardcore research for MW2019 that the guns feel any good.
@@dustinakadustin the guns in mw feel like the guns in battlefield games
@@alexfusneica2624 even better
Why are you asking that? I love no recoil.
@@winchesterchua3311 it's unrealistic
Roblox has got better graphics than Call of Duty.
StrapSlash And better graphics than BF. Roblox is close to the number 1 Crysis
StrapSlash stop, even if you think bf1 is better, you can't deny the graphics of world war 2 are good. And this was in June, graphics are even better now because the beta is out
xxTwisty Nope, roblox graphics are off the charts, if you haven't played roblox you have to.
xxTwisty im sorry, they're ugly on WW2, its my opinion.
xxTwisty I can deny the WWII graphics aren't good... they look terrible
When you have to put a reflex sight on a gun invented 1918, then you know that you are in CoD
Hauptsturmführer Müller I think reflex sights were invented by the time World War I was started, so it's not unlikely that they appeared in World War II.
Hauptsturmführer Müller This Cod takes place in the 1940s during ww2 not ww1
Hauptsturmführer Müller pretty sure ironsight where in battlefield 1 lmao
Bmess55 nobody here will understand because its cod and everyone have to hate it without purpose
Hauptsturmführer Müller or battlefield 1. Yeeea sure the MP 18 actually could fit a reflex sight that was only intended for the Enfield.
I myself happen to be an open minded person, which then let's me to like both games for what style they are.
Simplified, I like both
Carlos Romero #respect
TBAG what did that house do to you to deserve that