Incorrect the mod does not determine what engine the game will be built on or the graphics or anything just a basis of the gameplay not way before 2017 just 2017
I've played games older than World at war with better sound effects. The original COD for example and the old Day of Defeat on HL1 engine. Sound development was pretty much done before 2008 and there are more examples of better sounds for guns. In this case that argument doesn't old up in my opinion. For some reason game devs almost always skimp on the sound. But Battlefield has always had pretty good sounds.
Well, from a technical point of view its not fair to compare a game from 2008 with a game from 2017... But yeah, Day of Infamy is better in most aspects.
It's not just that. I did this also to show how the sounds advanced over time in WWII games. I imagine if the next COD will be set in WWII, then people will say : it's not fair to compare a AAA game to a game made by a way smaller team. xD
Even if it was a contest, they are on an equal playing-field since cod had much higher budget. Recording and post processing techniques haven't changed for a long time. only the equipment and knowledge has become cheaper and more accessible hence the high quality on an indie game. Doi Objectively sounds better with only post processing seemingly being Saturation/Distortion which means that the sound is very dynamic and realistic. But since equal or more minimal treatment is also done to every other sound, it makes sounds such as footsteps to be really quiet comparatively and you need good headphones to really enjoy the high fidelity of the soundscape and to be competitive. Cod is usually played on a couch with regular tv speakers so they added compression and stereo separation to make it sound bigger with narrow hifi speakers. In cod, footsteps peak at a similar levels as gun sounds do to make sure that everyone can hear them. People associate footsteps, echos and other misc sounds to be quieter so everything sounds a bit off but you can't tell why because your brain makes up for the lack of dynamic range. This way cod sounds are more useful to the player and when everything is playing, it doesn't sound half as bad as it really is on a technical and individual level. Soundscape is more than a sum of it's parts. If both games are made on a 32bit or 64bit engines, then the only limiting factor is the prowess of the dev team when it comes to sound design. Even 16bit might be enough but games during 16 bit time periods used midi and low quality samples because there wasn't enough room to store audio until CDs came around
I guess World at War is pretty old by now so maybe that's why I like the DoI sounds better. Really great job by the DoI guys considering the difference in budget!
So many people are saying "call of duty wins" "days of infamy wins" "call of duty sucks" and I just so badly want to smack these people with a sandal. This is not a contest, this is a comparison of an old game to a new to see if the graphics, sound and animation still hold up, which they surprisingly do.
THICC SMOKE I have no issue with call of duty What I have an issue with his people saying it won, or people saying days of infantry won Pretty much I have an issue with people saying one won over the other as it's not some sort of contest
Compares and 8x22mm Type 14 Nambu to a 9x19mm Luger..... Seems legit Edit: Its been a day, but I meant "Compares *an* 8x22mm" not "Compares *and* 8x22mm"
The Wandering Dovahkiin Ok, CoD reload animations are great, but in World at War they're terrible. Day of Infamy has better reload animations that CoD WaW.
COD franchise is messed up sense COD infinite warfare came out and that trailer became 2nd most disliked video on RUclips and many COD fans went to battlefield GOD BLESS BATTLEFIELD 1
I'm almost sure that WAW sounds were recorded indoors, and they added the echo later, whereas Day of Infamy sounds were recorded outdoors. That's why the later sound better and the former sound quiet.
really Nobody take a look at youtube search call of duty world at war behind the scene. doi sure sounded better because that game doesnt use IW engine which is known to doesnt have good sounding. oh and take a note as well doi is 2017 game with more advanced tecnology compared to 2008 game with old game engine
SUCC yea? and how old is IW engine? yes yes if u want to make game 10 years from the original engine release date u sure will update the engine with new coding. this however the source engine are updated in 2017 with more advanced tecnology as I said before, and the IW engine was updated in 2008 with tecnology less advanced than the 2017 tecnology, nowadays IW engine are far more superior than the IW engine in 2008 with probably comparable to 2017 source engine. However the video isnt fair at all because u dont really compare 2017 game with updated source engine to 2008 game with old engine
Jk Ggezpz the video wasnt necessarily meant to be fair, it was just comapring sounds with similar games, im fairly sure the creator of this video is aware that cod WaW was not made in 2017.
He's settling the rounds in the magazine. If you slow down the animation, you can actually see that the rounds haven't been settled yet within the magazine. Soldiers were often told to hit their magazine on a hard surface to settle the rounds properly before loading them.
Rose Supreme Right but the Thompson was actually unique in the fact that it's bolt didn't need to be pulled back after emptying a magazine, unless using a drum magazine. After emptying 20 or 30 round magazines, the Thompson's bolt remained open
Jeez, many WWII games have been getting it wrong. I have seen in Battlefield: Bad Company 2 where the user pulls the bolt back, pulls the mag out and then loads the new one in. Is that one accurate or wrong?
Chris Janicki They are the closest comparisons available: The Webley was a large caliber, powerful revolver, and the "Magnum Revolver" is just a generic name for the same type, but the last two pistols aren't really a decent comparison.
Visl SDio can you not read all he's saying is that for a game that's on the source engine the graphics look good not that the graphics look better than cod
There's something about older Call of Duty's, especially WaW, that have that nice touch of arcade-y feel blended in with realism that makes it just sooo much more enjoyable.
iV1rus0 It's fair though... also, he's not doing a "contest" here. It's a comparison. CoD was made by a huge team and an enormous budget. DoI is an Indy game made by a small team. Have you ever played Counter Strike 1.6? It is so old, yet weapon sounds are so powerful.
Help me reach 100 subs bad company 2 > bf 1 cod 4 modern warfare > the new cods forza horizon 2 > forza horizon 3 old sim cities > the new sim city shit
If Day of Infamy has the Sten, you could've technically compared it to WAW. No, not with the Type-100. WAW has a deleted British campaign, and the Sten model from WAW is used in Black Ops 1.
Maybe a few months down the line, you could make a comparison between Day of Infamy vs Call of Duty: WWII, or Day of Infamy vs Battallion 1944 or even Battallion 1944 vs Call of Duty: WWII. Hell, even Battlefield 1 vs Call of Duty: WWII/Days of Infamy/Battallion 1944 would be dope!
They look similar because of the lighting type, also everything is very reflective and has a higher color heat (seems to be a trend in BF games, they add a little more blue or red to the games after the beta...)
Gábor Várhegyi Titanfall 2 is on the Source engine ya know The Source engine itself is like,a magnum opus of engines Easily customizable,easily programmed but can be pushed to the limits to surpass even the latest engines
See, I like this review. At first I was all, wow comparing two games that came out at two drastically different times is fair, but instead I feel that this one shows how far that video games in the WW2 shooter genre have come. Great work!
I feel that World at War's weapons sounds are too...silent, not enough echo to give you a feel for how far the sound travels. Like the M1887, Springfield or Thompson are WAY TOO enclosed with not enough sound feedback.
I think a lot more games need gun sounds similar to those in insurgency/day of infamy. Like even in AAA games like R6S the gun sound effects might not be BAD but certainly not good.
Day of infamy 2017 vs World at war 2008... But Day of infamy is an Insurgency mod and both are on the source engine, WAW is on a different engine being the IW engine, IW 2.0 engine from 2005 compared to the Source engine from 2004, so technically WAW has the newer engine and should have been more advanced in a way
Well it kind of is, Day of Infamy has 2004 graphics because it's on a 2004 engine, same with CSGO, the engine was never updates unlike the engine for COD which gets updated every few years so the game can look better. A game from 2017 isn't necessarily going to look and sound better than a game from 2004 if they use the same engine. I'm assuming you've made a game so you can confirm or deny things with actual proof or evidence? If not, shut the fuck up
I don't know why people are complaining saying "oh it's unfair one is nine years older than the other" it's not a competition. it's literally just a video comparing the sounds of guns in two different games.
My opinions on the gun sounds: M2 Flamethrower - WaW M1911 - WaW Walther P38 - DoI Type 14/Luger - DoI Revolver - WaW M1 Carbine - WaW Kar98k - WaW M1903 Springfield - DoI Gewehr 43 - WaW M1 Garand - WaW STG-44 - DoI Thompson - DoI MP40 - DoI Type 99 LMG/Bren - DoI MG42 - DoI M1919 Browning - DoI FG42 - DoI M1918 BAR - DoI Trench Gun - WaW Grenade - WaW Bazooka - WaW Panzerschreck - DoI WaW - 10 DoI - 12
Literally every gun sound from DOI is better. They sound more real and are of so much higher quality. WaW sounds like a bunch of airsoft guns. I know it's obviously your opinion of course and that's fine but I shoot guns on the daily and I really think DOI is so much better.
As alot of people mentioned this game is from an older era, and usually some game companies like to compress and dampen the sound so shooting the gun doesnt become an obstruction to playing
Sir Crusade have you ever fired a gun? Because they Most definitely don't all sound the same. You're literally just making up crappy lies to defend this game. Which I don't know why you would but. Cool cool.
Wow...for once COD sounds almost realistic, by that I mean the M1 Garand. I'm just saying, I mean I'd say Band of Brothers is a good source for what weapons actually sounded like.
Connor Quarmby most guns in CoD don't sound anything like their real life versions, especially the FG42, the guns in DoI however sounds the closest to their real life version, you got the M1 Garand with its longer ping, the FG42 with its insane rate of fire and etc.
"almost realistic" honestly i think not i've fired enough guns to know cod doesnt really sound like the real thing, but heavily filtered and edited sounds
Jeremy Lim I was specifically on about the M1 Garand not anything else. Like I said, I assume Band of Brothers to be a trusted aourcw when it comes to that. Since you know, it was told by the actual people who were there and was made in to a 10 part HBO series. You know this right?
U.F.T assistant Doesn't really matter if it's new, DOI is an indy game made by a small team, whereas CoD is a AAA game made by a huge team and an enormous budget. Ever played Counter Strike 1.6? So old... yet gun sounds are powerful.
Yeah But you can not compare swords withnukes, by that I mean u can not compare 2008 technology with 2017 technology and say (DOI is better sound wise because the developers of WAW suck at making games)
The Thompson fires from an open bolt and it chambers the rounds (puts them into position to be fired) upon pulling the trigger, so what he's doing is resetting the bolt to its open position so that when it fires next, it will chamber the round and fire EDIT: I now realize you're taking about the DOI animation, and I have no clue what that's about. Thompsons were known for reliability, so idk
Not to be a dope, but which are the Day of Infamy sounds are which are Call of Duty World At War sounds? The title is 'Day of Infamy Gun Sounds vs Call of Duty World At War' and the description is 'Call of Duty World At War versus Day of Infamy'.
the sound effects from DoI are just so much betters. I rarely happens for a developer to really get that punch right. You can 'feel' the caliber of the guns
Even though I can tell which is which, it's probably a good idea to have which game is currently showing somewhere, maybe small up in the corner. So that people who are either unfamiliar or just simply interested in history or animation, and not necessarily video games.
Just figured I'd poomt out that the revolver you showed in WaW was a standard colt python type revolver but the 'comparison' was a ww1 British Webly Auto revolver, so it makes natural sense that they would sound and reload differently especially considering that 99% of Webly revolvers were break action and 99% of colt revolvers were side cylinder ejections.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Bad day to be a cloud
Old TW Games ahahahahahahahah
Old TW Games this comment saved my day .. but not the clouds
RIP to all the brave clouds and walls during the war.
You will be missed,
Care Bare Massacre.
Old TW Games lol lol
A better comparison would've been Day of Infamy Vs Red Orchestra 2
Lol ikr comparisons like these are sparking lots of controversy amongst game communities.
yeah
justinjacques766
justinjacques766 does that also include rising storm?
justinjacques766 liked it and made it 420!
Day Of Infarmy: 2017
World At War: 2008
You can make up anything you want from there, im just saying...
Actually, Day of Infamy was a mod for Insurgency, so it's way before 2017.
าาารสว
Hhg Fhg คนไทย เหรอโหลดภาษามา
Incorrect the mod does not determine what engine the game will be built on or the graphics or anything just a basis of the gameplay not way before 2017 just 2017
I've played games older than World at war with better sound effects. The original COD for example and the old Day of Defeat on HL1 engine. Sound development was pretty much done before 2008 and there are more examples of better sounds for guns. In this case that argument doesn't old up in my opinion.
For some reason game devs almost always skimp on the sound. But Battlefield has always had pretty good sounds.
Well, from a technical point of view its not fair to compare a game from 2008 with a game from 2017... But yeah, Day of Infamy is better in most aspects.
It's not just that. I did this also to show how the sounds advanced over time in WWII games. I imagine if the next COD will be set in WWII, then people will say : it's not fair to compare a AAA game to a game made by a way smaller team. xD
PC Gaming Videos Even then, I still imagine Day of Infamy sounding better than a cod game.
insurgency, has excellent gun sounds, from what ive heard the best outside of arma and battlefield
Check out the game Squad. Best sound design of any war game to date.
You do realise this game runs on Source engine? Same engine used on CS:GO and CS:S, aka 2006 game engine.
Lol so many triggered people in comments talking about 2008 vs 2017. This is a comparison not a contest.
Skelytun _ it does say Vs in the title
Even if it was a contest, they are on an equal playing-field since cod had much higher budget. Recording and post processing techniques haven't changed for a long time. only the equipment and knowledge has become cheaper and more accessible hence the high quality on an indie game.
Doi Objectively sounds better with only post processing seemingly being Saturation/Distortion which means that the sound is very dynamic and realistic. But since equal or more minimal treatment is also done to every other sound, it makes sounds such as footsteps to be really quiet comparatively and you need good headphones to really enjoy the high fidelity of the soundscape and to be competitive.
Cod is usually played on a couch with regular tv speakers so they added compression and stereo separation to make it sound bigger with narrow hifi speakers. In cod, footsteps peak at a similar levels as gun sounds do to make sure that everyone can hear them. People associate footsteps, echos and other misc sounds to be quieter so everything sounds a bit off but you can't tell why because your brain makes up for the lack of dynamic range. This way cod sounds are more useful to the player and when everything is playing, it doesn't sound half as bad as it really is on a technical and individual level. Soundscape is more than a sum of it's parts.
If both games are made on a 32bit or 64bit engines, then the only limiting factor is the prowess of the dev team when it comes to sound design. Even 16bit might be enough but games during 16 bit time periods used midi and low quality samples because there wasn't enough room to store audio until CDs came around
matti ur an idiot
why are u verified
jesse fam u want verified?
I guess World at War is pretty old by now so maybe that's why I like the DoI sounds better. Really great job by the DoI guys considering the difference in budget!
also running in source engine
DOI guys is New World Interactive
So many people are saying "call of duty wins" "days of infamy wins" "call of duty sucks" and I just so badly want to smack these people with a sandal. This is not a contest, this is a comparison of an old game to a new to see if the graphics, sound and animation still hold up, which they surprisingly do.
22megaton these were the gold age of cod mate no wonder why many people support it
THICC SMOKE
I have no issue with call of duty
What I have an issue with his people saying it won, or people saying days of infantry won
Pretty much I have an issue with people saying one won over the other as it's not some sort of contest
22megaton They're just a bunch of console kids
To bad Waw multiplayer is dead :/
FrostThreat48 is day on infamy on consoles or is it only on PC
Compares and 8x22mm Type 14 Nambu to a 9x19mm Luger.....
Seems legit
Edit: Its been a day, but I meant "Compares *an* 8x22mm" not "Compares *and* 8x22mm"
Raihan Purboyo I don't get it either. Two completely different pistols, so he shouldn't put them in the vid at all
CrADrafgo yep. The video maker should have learnt more about firearms.
maybe some guns are simply not available in the other game?ffs
UberTiger1 so don't show them
Raihan Purboyo He needs to reach the 10 mins for the ad money. Many youtubers do this while it negatively impacts the quality of the video
God damn just the sound of those "World at War" guns take me back. Best COD hands down.
All the CoD guns are so quiet.
Senekenn well It was made in2008. they had some limitations that aren't relevant anymore
because it was made in 2008.
DarkInfernape65 ehhhh the battlefield games still sounded alright.
boznizzle and it's cod. It still has crap gun sounds(mostly because all the iw gun sounds are taken from either paintball or airsoft guns
boznizzle this isn't bf dumbass
I prefer the gun sounds and reload sounds and the reloads in day of infamy.
of course people prefer the newest game rather than old game.
No Name it's engine were 13 years old, older than cod
Akihisa Yoshii i know.
Akihisa Yoshii COD runs on an ever older engine... what's your point?
The Wandering Dovahkiin Ok, CoD reload animations are great, but in World at War they're terrible. Day of Infamy has better reload animations that CoD WaW.
since the developers of COD is going back to their roots they might aswell make WAW 2 with WAW remastered
mont murillo not this year...sledgehammer is making this year's cod...WaW belongs to treyarch
Eadamb yes but they cannot make a WaW2
Eadamb if you read his comment you would have noticed that he said WaW2 not WW2
Yeah they seem to Fuck everything good up lol
COD franchise is messed up sense COD infinite warfare came out
and that trailer became 2nd most disliked video on RUclips
and many COD fans went to battlefield
GOD BLESS BATTLEFIELD 1
I'm almost sure that WAW sounds were recorded indoors, and they added the echo later, whereas Day of Infamy sounds were recorded outdoors. That's why the later sound better and the former sound quiet.
really Nobody take a look at youtube search call of duty world at war behind the scene. doi sure sounded better because that game doesnt use IW engine which is known to doesnt have good sounding. oh and take a note as well doi is 2017 game with more advanced tecnology compared to 2008 game with old game engine
Jk Ggezpz the source engine is 13 years old
SUCC yea? and how old is IW engine? yes yes if u want to make game 10 years from the original engine release date u sure will update the engine with new coding. this however the source engine are updated in 2017 with more advanced tecnology as I said before, and the IW engine was updated in 2008 with tecnology less advanced than the 2017 tecnology, nowadays IW engine are far more superior than the IW engine in 2008 with probably comparable to 2017 source engine. However the video isnt fair at all because u dont really compare 2017 game with updated source engine to 2008 game with old engine
Jk Ggezpz the video wasnt necessarily meant to be fair, it was just comapring sounds with similar games, im fairly sure the creator of this video is aware that cod WaW was not made in 2017.
really Nobody nope they were recorded outside...
8:40 I though he said "Fuck Me! Grenade!" XD
Nova Xtreme he does say it.
*tosses frag* "F*ck me grenade!" *stares at it* "sh*t!" *nade blows up on his face*
xD
Nova Xtreme That is what he actually said
Fuck Me Grenade! Ill just stare at it blows me up. Ah Shit! *KABOOOOOOM*
Grenade fanfics
4:51
What's with the spank?
He's settling the rounds in the magazine. If you slow down the animation, you can actually see that the rounds haven't been settled yet within the magazine. Soldiers were often told to hit their magazine on a hard surface to settle the rounds properly before loading them.
Fair enough. Though I'm curious why he didn't pull the bolt. It is meant to be an empty reload animation. Right?
Rose Supreme Right but the Thompson was actually unique in the fact that it's bolt didn't need to be pulled back after emptying a magazine, unless using a drum magazine. After emptying 20 or 30 round magazines, the Thompson's bolt remained open
Jeez, many WWII games have been getting it wrong.
I have seen in Battlefield: Bad Company 2 where the user pulls the bolt back, pulls the mag out and then loads the new one in. Is that one accurate or wrong?
Yeah that's also incorrect. After an empty magazine (as long as it is not a drum magazine), the Thompson's bolt will remain back
Honestly Both games are fucking awesome
I like how the Nambu slide release sound is a little "tack!" sound. XD
o.
Call of Duty World At War STILL RULES!! WHO'S WITH ME?
starwars niels Day of Infamy is a good game
Me
I am
Only CoD 1 and 2 with their expansions rule imo.
Pepe4358 CP bruh u don't know anything about the cod series then
Why is the Magnum revolver compared to the Webley? And the P08 to the Nambu?
Chris Janicki They are the closest comparisons available: The Webley was a large caliber, powerful revolver, and the "Magnum Revolver" is just a generic name for the same type, but the last two pistols aren't really a decent comparison.
@@WraithOfMan still, they aren't the same, it would be good if they weren't placed in the video in the first place.
honestly i like them equally.
I personally like neither. xd
Vincent Nunez What does me being a weeb have to do with anything? Are you high?
Vincent Nunez It's his opinion, just calm down. we all have different opinions, can't you respect that?
One person gets what the comments section should be used for. :^)
Vincent Nunez why people who like animes are treated as they have ebola? i don't get it. it's not a bad thing as long as you don't exagerate(?)
Day of Infamy has some really impressive graphics for a source game.
Royality City Chill out my man, he said that DOI had great graphics, he didn't say it was over cods graphics
The graphics are so good for a source game that i've had the engine crash on me twice lol
Visl SDio can you not read all he's saying is that for a game that's on the source engine the graphics look good not that the graphics look better than cod
Apex legends uses Source
@@HollowB the wut?
0:41 the most memorable sound ever!!
There's something about older Call of Duty's, especially WaW, that have that nice touch of arcade-y feel blended in with realism that makes it just sooo much more enjoyable.
Hey it depends on where you are what the sound will be. In a field, more echo. Crisp sound in urban area
I would prefer a Vietnam game, something that's not been done enough and that was a hell of a war.
Krad Links then play rising storm 2 vietnam
Krad Links or the day of infamy mod: born to kill
Krad Links rising storm 2 just came out.
Play Black ops 1
Finally a good feel of shooting! THE RECOIL :O good damn job... I like it.
Days of Infarmy looks amazing but the comparison is not fair, lets wait until WWII releases this year
iV1rus0 It's fair though... also, he's not doing a "contest" here. It's a comparison. CoD was made by a huge team and an enormous budget. DoI is an Indy game made by a small team. Have you ever played Counter Strike 1.6? It is so old, yet weapon sounds are so powerful.
iV1rus0 how is it not fair?
... says "vs" in the title ....
It's not fair because it's comparing a 2008 game to a 2017 game
Revvion games from 2006 have better gun sounds than waw
The best call of duty ever never forgot the gun sounds
As someone who shot a real m1a1 carbine, the day of infamy takes the cake
you basically sold me on Day if Infamy just on this video, sounds really great.
"Hmm, what does this do..." *pulls pin on grenade and throws* "FUCK ME, GRENADE!!!!!" *BOOM*
XLegionarre716X xD
XLegionarre716X I'M HIT
Old games are more fun than new games .
Day Of Infamy looks more fun to play. I have CoD WaW on my PC
Erik Passo Except Titanfall 2
Erik Passo Not really,Titanfall 2 > Titanfall
Gta Sa > Gta 3
Bf1 > Bf hardline
Help me reach 100 subs bad company 2 > bf 1
cod 4 modern warfare > the new cods
forza horizon 2 > forza horizon 3
old sim cities > the new sim city shit
and bioshock 1 is better than bioshock infinte
Why did CoD go to space?
Because no one on earth wants it.
Cinge r so original
Cinge r original
WW2 cod is back
pirated joke....
Cinge r le funny meme 2k16
Fuck me! Grenade! * Shrapnel hits face * Shit!
2008 to 2017 games
Seems legit.
Next video is comparing Gta Vice City graphics to Gta 5 on pc with graphics mods.
Ham Sandwich Lol, you obviously don't see the point of the video, which was to show how the sounds have evolved over time.
Ham Sandwich Title says: "Day of infamy GUN SOUNDS vs Call of Duty World at War"
What are you talking about?
Aaron Muck he's just copying every other comment on this video
HeyItsPaco Ah, clearly a troll, or a really upset 4 year old that grew up on CoD
Aaron Muck We are on 2k17.
I bet the second one.
That quick millisecond scope with the spring field 👌
For the next WW2 graphics and sound comparison.
Day of Infamy vs Wolfenstein 3d!
At 4:51, why did he hit the barrel with the magazine? What purpose does it have?
All these snide remaks..
Pretty sure the uploader didn't meant to make it a "which one is better" contest. It's just a comparison folks, that's all.
It has the word vs in the title
collin monroe So? The creator uses vs as a replacement word for comparison
If Day of Infamy has the Sten, you could've technically compared it to WAW. No, not with the Type-100. WAW has a deleted British campaign, and the Sten model from WAW is used in Black Ops 1.
These guns are cooler than Infinite warfare's ones, I hope that cod ww2 is going to have guns like this
Maybe a few months down the line, you could make a comparison between Day of Infamy vs Call of Duty: WWII, or Day of Infamy vs Battallion 1944 or even Battallion 1944 vs Call of Duty: WWII.
Hell, even Battlefield 1 vs Call of Duty: WWII/Days of Infamy/Battallion 1944 would be dope!
ShadowBolt995 CoD WWII? what kind of next level drugs you taking bro?
no drugs it's comfirmed
Day of Infamy is great.
The reticle detail of the springfield in Day of infamy is awesome
is it me, or does day of infamy have battlefield 1 like graphics?
They look similar because of the lighting type, also everything is very reflective and has a higher color heat (seems to be a trend in BF games, they add a little more blue or red to the games after the beta...)
burrow the hamster Not at all dude, take a better look...
im talking graphics not gameplay
absolutely not, it's not even close. trust me, I love DOI, but it's a source engine game, graphics is very limited
Gábor Várhegyi Titanfall 2 is on the Source engine ya know
The Source engine itself is like,a magnum opus of engines
Easily customizable,easily programmed but can be pushed to the limits to surpass even the latest engines
I'd like to know where the casings for the belt fed lmgs went in WAW, as the belt clips can be seen, but not what they were attached too.
Well for being a 2008 game, sounds and animations aren' t that bad.
BaronVonHellMet the sounds are
BaronVonHellMet You gotta admit, they didnt even try on the gewehr 43 sounds lol
BaronVonHellMet You can tell sounds werent the priority.
See, I like this review. At first I was all, wow comparing two games that came out at two drastically different times is fair, but instead I feel that this one shows how far that video games in the WW2 shooter genre have come. Great work!
I feel that World at War's weapons sounds are too...silent, not enough echo to give you a feel for how far the sound travels. Like the M1887, Springfield or Thompson are WAY TOO enclosed with not enough sound feedback.
I'll have to agree with you there.
i love that with the FG42 the CoD charector just drops the magezine like it's a dead rat being dropped in the trash by a disgusted person.
day of infamy vs rising storm
Orso Zen also red orchestra 2
Did they re-use a lot of the gun sounds from Insurgency for Day of Infamy or were they all brand new?
6:25 Also how come the MG42 belt is cut off like that
hmm Day of Infamy sound more realtic
i love how the magnum casings make he sounds of hitting the floor while theyre in mid air
Now u can do this with cod ww2
2:56 nice quickscope m8
Day Of Infamy... wins :)
yup
no shit dude its almost 10 years newer
DJ Twenty I think the sounds for day of infamy may have been recorded outside while waws sound like they were recorded in a firing range
DJ Twenty no
DJ Twenty but... cod-2008 and Day of infamy-2017.... ;-)
I would like to see a Red Orchestra 2 vs Day of Infamy comparison.
I think a lot more games need gun sounds similar to those in insurgency/day of infamy. Like even in AAA games like R6S the gun sound effects might not be BAD but certainly not good.
Forget about the sound, look at that beautiful animations
Day of infamy 2017 vs World at war 2008... But Day of infamy is an Insurgency mod and both are on the source engine, WAW is on a different engine being the IW engine, IW 2.0 engine from 2005 compared to the Source engine from 2004, so technically WAW has the newer engine and should have been more advanced in a way
hahahahaha
The irony
Titanfall doesn't look great
That's not how engines work for fucks sake....
Well it kind of is, Day of Infamy has 2004 graphics because it's on a 2004 engine, same with CSGO, the engine was never updates unlike the engine for COD which gets updated every few years so the game can look better. A game from 2017 isn't necessarily going to look and sound better than a game from 2004 if they use the same engine. I'm assuming you've made a game so you can confirm or deny things with actual proof or evidence?
If not, shut the fuck up
you deserve more subscribes ☺
I could fart louder than the COD gun sounds.
James Sawley *oh*
Yuk
James Sawley *FART JOKES*
So why do the have the M1 Garand with the ping sound when the clip is ejected?? The ping doesn't happen until the metal clip hits a solid surface.
8:40 wait what 😂
What was wrong with it?
I don't know why people are complaining saying "oh it's unfair one is nine years older than the other" it's not a competition. it's literally just a video comparing the sounds of guns in two different games.
I Like WAW more
Daft same
I like the punchiness to each shot in Day of Infamy! The animations are nice and smooth too!
My opinions on the gun sounds:
M2 Flamethrower - WaW
M1911 - WaW
Walther P38 - DoI
Type 14/Luger - DoI
Revolver - WaW
M1 Carbine - WaW
Kar98k - WaW
M1903 Springfield - DoI
Gewehr 43 - WaW
M1 Garand - WaW
STG-44 - DoI
Thompson - DoI
MP40 - DoI
Type 99 LMG/Bren - DoI
MG42 - DoI
M1919 Browning - DoI
FG42 - DoI
M1918 BAR - DoI
Trench Gun - WaW
Grenade - WaW
Bazooka - WaW
Panzerschreck - DoI
WaW - 10 DoI - 12
what guns did you shoot IRL?
chickenflem none
KillerDud301 i think you might want to rethink your opinion on the gewehr...
Literally every gun sound from DOI is better. They sound more real and are of so much higher quality. WaW sounds like a bunch of airsoft guns. I know it's obviously your opinion of course and that's fine but I shoot guns on the daily and I really think DOI is so much better.
Nolan Campbell big boy here shoots guns on the daily look out!!!
As alot of people mentioned this game is from an older era, and usually some game companies like to compress and dampen the sound so shooting the gun doesnt become an obstruction to playing
Day of Infamy wins hands down. Treyarch better improve their gun sounds for their next installment.
Revive Hans well, It was made in 2008. sure così gun sounds have(not) improved
DarkInfernape65 the sound was a complete copy of Insurgency with a bit of edit from 2014, and the engine were 13 years old.
Revive Hans DOI didn't even sound good. Every gun sounded the same. Besides the bazooka and grenades
Ham Sandwich Little did you know, most guns sound the same when they fire. Dont let Codmunism taint your mind.
Sir Crusade have you ever fired a gun? Because they Most definitely don't all sound the same. You're literally just making up crappy lies to defend this game. Which I don't know why you would but. Cool cool.
What's that music that plays at the end of the video?
Hennessy Blues Darude Sandstorm
COD is better and i love COD
Why did you do the nambu and luger together? they're 2 seperate pistols.
Doi!
I got it 13-9 for Day of Infamy but pretty impressive that WAW that came out in 2008 with weaker audio technology won so many.
Wow...for once COD sounds almost realistic, by that I mean the M1 Garand. I'm just saying, I mean I'd say Band of Brothers is a good source for what weapons actually sounded like.
Connor Quarmby most guns in CoD don't sound anything like their real life versions, especially the FG42, the guns in DoI however sounds the closest to their real life version, you got the M1 Garand with its longer ping, the FG42 with its insane rate of fire and etc.
"almost realistic" honestly i think not i've fired enough guns to know cod doesnt really sound like the real thing, but heavily filtered and edited sounds
Jeremy Lim I was specifically on about the M1 Garand not anything else. Like I said, I assume Band of Brothers to be a trusted aourcw when it comes to that. Since you know, it was told by the actual people who were there and was made in to a 10 part HBO series. You know this right?
Connor Quarmby we're going off on you because you said that CoD sound realistic for once, CoD's weapons don't sound realistic at all.
Amobrero127 apart from the M1 GARAND WHICH IS WHAT I WAS SPECIFICALLY TALKING ABOUT. NOTHING ELSE JUST THE M1
i love how day of infamy just puts detail into their reload animations and there's just cod shoves a rocket into a rocket lancer and it works
Except day of infamy will never be as good as cod waw
DJWeedoz have you played Day of Infamy?
DOI Bazooka and panzerschreck launching and exploding sounds are awesome
so basically, most guns in days of infamy sound th same
Dapper yet Crass You sure you were listening? They each sound unique. In game, you can easily pick out a gun in the distance just based on sound.
You need to get your ears checked
they seem for every class, pistols sound the same, rifles sound the same, etc
if you fire 2 different guns in the same enviorment, they will both sound very much alike.
I love how the m1 carbine sounds like a wind chime in WaW
oh come on .... the only games CoD would win against are on mobile
Vincent Law lol you are probably playing csgo...
lol why do people always use csgo as an insult
why hate on cod?
Jeremy Lim I dunno, it's not even an argument since it's not the best looking game
Sounds like you weren't great at CoD.
The CoD soldier seems to know his way around his guns much more than the other guy.
Day of infamy is waaaaaaaay better
The Omega D3RP Gaming day of infamy is new
U.F.T assistant Doesn't really matter if it's new, DOI is an indy game made by a small team, whereas CoD is a AAA game made by a huge team and an enormous budget. Ever played Counter Strike 1.6? So old... yet gun sounds are powerful.
Yeah But you can not compare swords withnukes, by that I mean u can not compare 2008 technology with 2017 technology and say (DOI is better sound wise because the developers of WAW suck at making games)
game development it's more easely than first.
Edomus What the fuck's an "indy" game
why the animation of Thommy Smacks the Gun with the Mag b4 really reloading?
Ghifary Muhammad I think that is done to fix the spring in the magazine so it lines up, and the bullets actually go in the gun properly.
The Thompson fires from an open bolt and it chambers the rounds (puts them into position to be fired) upon pulling the trigger, so what he's doing is resetting the bolt to its open position so that when it fires next, it will chamber the round and fire
EDIT: I now realize you're taking about the DOI animation, and I have no clue what that's about. Thompsons were known for reliability, so idk
Which WW2 gun would win, MP40 or Thompson (Tommy gun)?
Thompson in stopping power.
MP40 in everything else.
I am rewatching this since I just bought Day Of Infamy. It was on sale yesterday.
Not to be a dope, but which are the Day of Infamy sounds are which are Call of Duty World At War sounds? The title is 'Day of Infamy Gun Sounds vs Call of Duty World At War' and the description is 'Call of Duty World At War versus Day of Infamy'.
the sound effects from DoI are just so much betters. I rarely happens for a developer to really get that punch right. You can 'feel' the caliber of the guns
4:52 why does he whack the side of the gun with the clip before inserting it??
Even though I can tell which is which, it's probably a good idea to have which game is currently showing somewhere, maybe small up in the corner. So that people who are either unfamiliar or just simply interested in history or animation, and not necessarily video games.
Ya gotta remember that BFBC came out in like 2008 and sounded betta.
imagine a group of german, or japanese soldiers walking up to the sounds of gunfire, only to see a random guy shooting various guns at the sky.
Btw how do you test weapons like this?
I don’t want to sound dumb or anything but is days of infantry for Xbox one?
Man i love the World at war mp40 sound
Nice nice!!! For compare Medal of Honor Airborn VS Red Orcestra 2 or Heroes and Generals
Just figured I'd poomt out that the revolver you showed in WaW was a standard colt python type revolver but the 'comparison' was a ww1 British Webly Auto revolver, so it makes natural sense that they would sound and reload differently especially considering that 99% of Webly revolvers were break action and 99% of colt revolvers were side cylinder ejections.
Accuracy: DOI
Childhood: CoD: WaW