I work at a Ford dealership and I've driven many of these Rangers in all trims. I also just bought a new Colorado Z71 last year, and I've driven several Tacomas that have been traded in. That EcoBoost torque in the Ranger is nice, the 10-speed is snappier than the Colorado's 8-speed, and the Ranger seats feel more comfortable. That being said, the driving dynamics are a lot better in the GM trucks (midsize and fullsize). Compared to the Ranger, the Colorado ride is more planted and compliant, the steering is tighter, and the interior is quieter and better laid out. I'd still take a Ranger over the Tacoma, which feels dated in every way, has sub-par brakes, and a terrible seating position. Also if you get a Lariat Ranger it does come with push button start and the same configurable gauge cluster that you can get in an Explorer or Edge. Finally, I'd rather have a midsizer for the sake of having something to live with every day. I drive/park those F-150s more than anything else and they're a pain in tight spaces, which there are a lot of here in Massachusetts.
1mlb704 thanks for the insight really considering getting a Ranger. Love the idea of the turbo 4. I’ve always loved Tacoma’s but a bit tight inside for me and the Colorado’s have a lot going for them I’ve just never been a huge fan of the look. And I totally agree I don’t need a full size truck like the F-150 plus I can fit this in my garage which is always a plus.
Add interior rattles to your Tacoma list. I own a 17 Tacoma. First and last Toyota. Thier quality has slipped. I'd rather deal with any chevy dealer any day then then the best toyota dealer at thier finest moment. Oh yeah and their frames still rust. The recall notice is on my desk.
Agreed 100% in my opinion there's really no market for this truck.. when you could spend 2-4k more and get a full-sized F150. When you're financing we are talking a couple bucks a month. No clue who would buy this ...
@Christian Really I went with my old man to see Trucks at Ford, he left with a 2019 XLT Sport F150 for 50k...I left the dealership with a 2019 XLT Sport Ranger for 32k, we both left with a truck 😂 50k is a Big Difference to a 32k
Size is the biggest factor... When someone is shopping for a smaller sized pickup truck, the F150 is just too big. That's the main reason I have not purchased an F150, it's not the price tag, its the overall size. A lot of people that live in cities or more populated areas are looking for a smaller truck, and the Ranger was missing from the Ford line up for far too long. Glad to see it back again.
I just actually had this decision a month ago. I ended up getting the F150. The rebates and dealer discounts made the F150 an easy choice. The Ranger was comfortable for the size. It did have some disappointments. The way the back seats fold for storage could not be a worse design. Even on the highest trim the ranger has a manual back window.
You get that key with all the lower end model pickups. You have to get a Lariat trim to have push button start and proximity remot. Ford is not the only company like this either.
A nice honest review Matt, way to not hold back. I would have to agree with all your points. I use to be a Chevy salesman and would love to be able to get into a Colorado, but I can't even afford a 2wd Nissan Frontier S. :/ So being one who loves to learn about new vehicles and my youngest brother being a Ford fan, when I saw the exact same built truck, color and everything on the local Ford lot I had to stop and check it out. I told the salesman that I was just curious and wanted to take pics for my Army bro that was overseas at the time. I got in it and wasn't wowed by anything. It definitely doesn't standout in most cases. It does look no better than the Colorados/Canyons that came out in 2015. I didn't drive it but the only two things that I like about the Ranger is the punchy ecoboost engine with the 10 speed, most reviewers agree and I like how on the FX4 Off Road package there is not a HUGE 5-6 inch chin spoiler on it like the Colorado has with its Z71 "Off Road" package. That was actually smart. I hope Chevy/GMC follow suit in their refresh (I am hoping that it comes soon). When I showed my brother and told him the price, he sent me back a pic of a new F-150 XLT Crew Cab for the same $38-39k, albeit with some good factory rebates. I am single with no kids and I don't need a full sized truck right now, I like the maneuverability of a mid sized truck. I can fit better on these skinny dirt roads out in the country, plus I still have the utility of a truck bed. But if I had the $$$ and there was a sweet deal on a light duty truck for about the same as a mid sizer I can see how it would be tough to pass up. The truck I would love to have in the mid size class is a Colorado ZR2 crew cab, since I enjoy hunting, fishing, kayaking and camping, it would definitely get me places that my compact sedan won't. Thanks for sharing this on point review.
At $39,000, you're getting a Ranger XLT Super Crew 4x4 with thousands of dollars in options. If you were to just get an F150 XLT Super Crew 4x4 or even a Super Cab 4x4, you'd be blowing past $40,000 before any options. A similarly equipped F150 with the FX4 package, painted trim, Nav, etc. will be closer to $50,000. The prices aren't close at all. Also, they're two different categories of vehicle. The F150 is a much larger truck. If I don't want a vehicle that size, why would I spend $10,000 more for an F150? In reality, the appeal here is a smaller size and a much cheaper price.
Thank you! People constantly compare prices between midsize and full size trucks but they never use comparably equipped vehicles in their comments. $10,000 is 25% and that's a significant price difference.
The reason why it's nearly 50k for all the same options is because the FX4 package on the F-150 forces you into upgrading engines. If you skip that package you're only at 45k even with the other options still in place. I understand not everyone wants a bigger truck, but for 5k more, you get a lot more truck, still making it the better value, like my original point was suggesting.
@@MattMaranMotoring Then it's even less comparable without the FX4 package. I don't think the base 3.3L V6 is comparable here. It really doesn't have a lot beans to it. I think the 2.7L Ecoboost would offer the same "punchiness" the 2.3L EB offers in the Ranger. An F150 XLT 4x4 with their weak N/A V6 and nothing more. You're really cutting out a lot of options just to even approach the price of the truck in this video. If you skip options on the Ranger and just settle for the XLT 4x4 with no options, you're at about $35,000, so you're still at about a $10,000 less than a comparable F150.
I went to buy a Colorado Z71 in Orange on Saturday. Came home with an LTZ-Z71 Silverado instead. For less money. Incentives beat out everything else, imo. The new Silverado has a sport mode. I launched it and did a burnout. You should try to snag a Silverado RST 6.2L crew cab short bed. It is a fun truck to drive.
Josh Clontz man. I want that truck with the 6.2 and the tail pipes that are under the bumper. In silver with black int..... but I can’t afford it. I would take the 5.3. But would rather have the bigger engine... hows the trans treating ya? Do you like how it shifts?
An F150 4x4 crewcab with similar options is about $10,000 more expensive. Don't compare this to a stripped out F150 XL or something. That's just an unfair comparison.
@@sikorski3842 actually, you're right. I had the trucks mixed up. You can get a similarly trimmed F250 for the same MSRP as a similar F150. Believe it or not. However, with incentives, you're still better off getting the 150 vs the Ranger. I haven't seen any incentives yet for Rangers in my area, while the 150 has about $7k in incentives. The Ranger is already outdated. I want to like it because I'm a Ford guy, but I just can't get behind it. Sadly, I'd buy the Colorado before the Ranger. Even the Ranger Lariat trim looks like they half assed it. Unless you live in an urban area and worry about parking in tight spots, there's really no reason to even consider a Ranger. Personal preference aside.
@@Mr_Chris77 The Rangers are also being discounted. No truck sells for MSRP, not even mid-size trucks. This dealer already has around $7,000 off MSRP on Ranger XLTs, and it's not even clearance time. You could get a well equipped Ranger for under $28,000. An F150 XLT, even after discounts, would still be much more money. www.jarrettgordonforddavenport.com/inventory/new-vehicles/models=Ford_Ranger+vehicle-type=Truck+sort=display_price,asc
Matt you are spot on with this review, IT is nice you are keeping honesty in your reviews. I agree The Ranger is not priced right, your better off getting an F-150, and also I agree 90% of Americans Really only need a Honda Ridgeline, If they try it they would love the Ridgeline. I recently drove one and it is a great vehicle. It can't tow like the body on frame V8 trucks, but for most people it is perfect. Keep up the Great Reviews
Nah, I'll pass on buying a crossover suv with a bed. That thing is not a truck anymore than an El Camino was a truck. It's a car with a bed and just generally not worth it to any real pickup truck buyer
If you're doing truck stuff all the time then yeah, but for daily driving and normal day to day use, these midsize trucks are super nice. So much easier to park and get around town with.
I cross shopped the F150 with the Tacoma in the fall of 2015. When comparably equipped, the real world street price of the Tacoma was 25% less. The Tacoma still tows my travel trailer very well, handles my home renovation projects with ease and my family fits inside comfortably. The Tacoma fits easily in my garage too. Why would I spend an additional $10,000 on something that I don't need?
what makes you think Ford isn't Redesigning the Ranger right now? do you think Ford is going to stick with this Old Design? why do you think Ford is keeping the production low? there's a reason why you're Low Buck, it's because you're intellectually Lazy
I think if this guy was 6'5" 265lbs then he would like the new Ranger more, I would like the Ranger if it 5k cheaper on the low end and 10k cheaper on the high end models. At these prices, the F-150 is a no brainer.
I might consider once someone helps me understand why a 4 cylinder cost this much? to have 4x4 xlt in a 4 cylinder its over 30k? Is a v8 xlt with same options a little over 60k? is so trucks are no longer for working people. I need a good dependable truck really bad and I would like to own a new one for once in my life, but its just to damn unaffordable for what you get and the depreciation. Same with Chevy. Colorado's v6 4x4 over 35k. New v8 Silverado cost close to 70? If not then why the big mark up between the mid size and full size
Try Nissan. If I were working with it everyday I'd choose a base 4cyl Frontier. I had a dealer offer me one for $17k new it was 2wd auto with a few small options, hand crank windows. I think it had keyless entry and cruise. They had red, white or silver in color for that price.
Good honest review Matt. TFLTruck, (who I swear is sponsored by Ford) will tell you that this is the best mid-size truck on the market. There is nothing special about this truck at all. There are definitely better trucks to spend your money on in this market. FYI, I believe it was Motor Trend about two months ago that tested this truck and had guys under the truck looking for broken suspension components, trying to figure out why the ride quality was so bad. It turned out that there was nothing broken.
Yea right . I own one and the ride is great. Strait and sure and I have never noticed anything out of the normal with the suspension. Smooth as a f150. And I’ve owned both. Besides if you don’t like the ride there’s always after market shocks. Fords been in the game to long . The down right truth of the matter is the Tacoma , Colorado and the Ranger are all good trucks. It’s a matter of personal preference. It seems people would rather argue then agree on anything these days. I’ve heard the same said in reviews about the Tacoma and the Colorado. So go from there. And all three trucks run about the same price when comparing options to options
Damn Matt, you have a really good point of view and the way your thoughts and feeling come out is very well weighted, alot of people are overly happy about cars while a minority is overly dissapointed, for me and my experience, you have your feeling stated well and just gives the correct vibes, idk how to explain it, but we'll done
The problem is Ford doesn't want you to buy this. After incentives the f150 is almost the same price as this. It's hard to find a ranger under $32k and after incentives that's not far off an f150 My local dealer only has about $1500-2500 in discounts for the ranger. And they offer over $11k off on an f150
I think the aesthetics of this first generation leave a lot to be desired. It seems like an Aussie influenced design. It just looks too _soft_ (for lack of a better word) when you think of a pickup truck. Idk how else to describe it other than the fact that you tend to automatically recognize non-US compliant vehicles on our roads. For instance, a Peugeot would stand out here in the US. The same could be said about American vehicles in other countries. You'd definitely spot an F-150 in the streets of Rome lets say. I'd be more interested in Gen 3 or 4 of this reintroduced Ranger. It has great potential and yet it still has a long way to go. Until then I'm ready to buy the Jeep Gladiator [Gen 2]. However to be fair, I'm also biased towards Jeep being that I used to build custom TJ's for many years but I digress. I say Gen 2 because we also refuse to buy a first-year production run of anything, especially vehicles. As a former tech, custom fabricator and general consumer advocate; I've been on the inside of many dealerships from Ford to Ferrari. If there's one thing I've learned, it's that you _never_ buy version 1.0 of a new product. Let them work out all the bugs and kindly allow the overeager to eat the initial depreciation. Auto manufacturers won't scrap a model after just one year of sales so there will always be a generation two and so forth. Just a friendly tip for the community. Keep up the good work my friend. EDITED for internal RUclips error.
This was a good review. At times you did seem to start the next sentence before you fished your last sentence. That is not a complaint just an observation. I test drove one of these and liked it, then priced one out in Lariat trim. It came out at $46, 570, and some basic things are missing for this kind of money. IE No memory seat function, no heated steering wheel and no power rear slider. I drive an F 150 that I like and it listed for 50K It's a Super Crew XLT with a V8. It is ruby red and I added black wheel and new tires. This truck gets an awful lot of compliments. I am going to pursue the Ranger, and probably buy one of I can get Ford and dealer discounts totaling in the area of $7500.00. I base this on your review along with all the negative comments it inspired about the vehicle. Also there is your remark about the next update of the Ranger and then the possibility of the Raptor version. I think that down sizing along with better milage is a factor influencing my desire for this truck. They are much easier to navigate in town and parking lots than the full size F 150 Thanks again. Bill Rogan AKA dungteller.com
I use to lament the turbo 4s killing the v6s. Then I drove a turbo 4. Now I'm happy to see the turbo 4 rid the world of them. I6s were a different thing, silk smooth torque down low. Turbo 4s are dramatic but torque always.
Did you check to make sure you're signed up to receive "all notifications"? RUclips now has 3 levels which makes it unnecessarily complicated. If you hit the bell, you then have to go and manually select "all notifications" otherwise it'll only push them through occasionally. It's annoying that they complicated it.
Big trucks are getting bigger and cost as much as a house. The new Ranger is the same size as a '91 F150 and still too expensive. Why do I want a 4' side on the bed. Please bring back the Rachero or El Camino at a down to earth price the average person can afford and still be able to park in the garage. I really miss my S-10. Currently driving a no thrills '08 Ranger hoping it can last long enough before Ford and Chevy wise up that we all don't need or want a HUGE truck (even at the mid size level).
that key is typical for f150 XL and superduty XL's. i've got a work 2018 XL power package and it's got that same type of key...no push button start, and the msrp was like 41k so yeah, 150's are pretty expensive too even when not fully decked.
No mention in this review of the terrain management and trail control 4wd features in this test model. I've heard this model is very capable off road. The Honda Ridgeline looks like they bolted on an Accord to the front. The Ridgeline towing is only 3500 to 5000 lbs. But it's all a matter personal preferences.
Terrible execution by Ford. What were they thinking? If the Ranger gets cancelled again that’s it. They had a chance, hopefully they don’t screw up with the Bronco.
Good review. Placeholder is probably correct. I'd go for the Gladiator if I had to buy a midsize truck today. I could not see going from my F150 to this Ranger.
@@erickrecinos2931 don't have to be. sport S package starts about 36K. But honestly, i'd pay more for a Gladiator than a Ranger because of the offroad capabilites and the removable doors and roof.
halogen bulbs though are easy and cheap to replace yourself. good luck doing led's on the cheap. a bulb is like what 3 bucks. If it aint broke dont fix it i say. i wish they would make a version with a stick shift and a non turbo model personally but this new ranger does look sharp in that color.
If the crew cab short box 4x4 Lariat was available with the 2.7 TT V6 and a manual transmission, I'd trade in my Tacoma tomorrow. I would really miss the Tacoma's composite bed though. P.S. On the Rangers that I looked at in Canada, there was storage behind and under the rear seats and the rear seat bottom did fold up.
That’s what reviews are generally for, to tell potential customers what the product is like. If every review was 100% positive how would they differ from commercials?
Ended up with an f150 STX 4x4 SCREW. 38,000. Cheap hard plastic interior, and the size is too much. The bed is impossible to use unless you get a step ladder, pop the hood to check the fluids...samething, so tall I can't even check the oil. 4x4 with no under body protection..no thanks. Ford refuses...absolutely refuses to allow the Ranger to be great, just enough to compete, and not excel in a class it should dominate.
I would rather go with the F150 with a 3.3 v6 more room, comfort, same gas mileage and price ! The Ranger only offers a 2.3 turbo ! Not interested in a turbo so it’s a no brainer for me! the best way to buy is buy a leftover every year in July and AUG and get 8 to 10 k off the price!!!!
Way over priced! People buy these trucks because they're smaller and cheaper. All these new "small" trucks are the size of a full size from 10 years ago, but the price of current full size.
I work at a Ford dealership and I've driven many of these Rangers in all trims. I also just bought a new Colorado Z71 last year, and I've driven several Tacomas that have been traded in. That EcoBoost torque in the Ranger is nice, the 10-speed is snappier than the Colorado's 8-speed, and the Ranger seats feel more comfortable. That being said, the driving dynamics are a lot better in the GM trucks (midsize and fullsize). Compared to the Ranger, the Colorado ride is more planted and compliant, the steering is tighter, and the interior is quieter and better laid out. I'd still take a Ranger over the Tacoma, which feels dated in every way, has sub-par brakes, and a terrible seating position. Also if you get a Lariat Ranger it does come with push button start and the same configurable gauge cluster that you can get in an Explorer or Edge. Finally, I'd rather have a midsizer for the sake of having something to live with every day. I drive/park those F-150s more than anything else and they're a pain in tight spaces, which there are a lot of here in Massachusetts.
1mlb704 thanks for the insight really considering getting a Ranger. Love the idea of the turbo 4. I’ve always loved Tacoma’s but a bit tight inside for me and the Colorado’s have a lot going for them I’ve just never been a huge fan of the look. And I totally agree I don’t need a full size truck like the F-150 plus I can fit this in my garage which is always a plus.
Add interior rattles to your Tacoma list. I own a 17 Tacoma. First and last Toyota. Thier quality has slipped. I'd rather deal with any chevy dealer any day then then the best toyota dealer at thier finest moment. Oh yeah and their frames still rust. The recall notice is on my desk.
I am glad that the Ranger is better than ever
It would be nice if there is a manual transmission
It'd also b nice if the Nissan GT-R has a stick too
Yea and am /fm radio 2 barrel carburetor lol
My dad bought a 2018 F-150 5.0 L, 10 Speed Auto for only $1000 more than a ranger. Why wouldn’t you upgrade? He gets awesome gas mileage also.
yea that turbo will tank that fuel economy i bet. turbos will do that
Agreed 100% in my opinion there's really no market for this truck.. when you could spend 2-4k more and get a full-sized F150. When you're financing we are talking a couple bucks a month. No clue who would buy this ...
@Christian Really I went with my old man to see Trucks at Ford, he left with a 2019 XLT Sport F150 for 50k...I left the dealership with a 2019 XLT Sport Ranger for 32k, we both left with a truck 😂 50k is a Big Difference to a 32k
Size is the biggest factor... When someone is shopping for a smaller sized pickup truck, the F150 is just too big. That's the main reason I have not purchased an F150, it's not the price tag, its the overall size.
A lot of people that live in cities or more populated areas are looking for a smaller truck, and the Ranger was missing from the Ford line up for far too long. Glad to see it back again.
@@ejm_demon8263 So...your dad paid sticker? Is he not good at negotiating?
"Welcome back guys! In this episode were dissing ford!"
I just actually had this decision a month ago. I ended up getting the F150. The rebates and dealer discounts made the F150 an easy choice. The Ranger was comfortable for the size. It did have some disappointments. The way the back seats fold for storage could not be a worse design. Even on the highest trim the ranger has a manual back window.
Matt the type of person to talk about "9 to 3 hand position" when reviewing a vehicle 🤣👌🏽
You get that key with all the lower end model pickups. You have to get a Lariat trim to have push button start and proximity remot. Ford is not the only company like this either.
I love the new ranger, not a truck guy, never will be, but it looks great
Jus become a construction worker and you'll probably like trucks
A nice honest review Matt, way to not hold back. I would have to agree with all your points. I use to be a Chevy salesman and would love to be able to get into a Colorado, but I can't even afford a 2wd Nissan Frontier S. :/ So being one who loves to learn about new vehicles and my youngest brother being a Ford fan, when I saw the exact same built truck, color and everything on the local Ford lot I had to stop and check it out. I told the salesman that I was just curious and wanted to take pics for my Army bro that was overseas at the time. I got in it and wasn't wowed by anything. It definitely doesn't standout in most cases. It does look no better than the Colorados/Canyons that came out in 2015. I didn't drive it but the only two things that I like about the Ranger is the punchy ecoboost engine with the 10 speed, most reviewers agree and I like how on the FX4 Off Road package there is not a HUGE 5-6 inch chin spoiler on it like the Colorado has with its Z71 "Off Road" package. That was actually smart. I hope Chevy/GMC follow suit in their refresh (I am hoping that it comes soon). When I showed my brother and told him the price, he sent me back a pic of a new F-150 XLT Crew Cab for the same $38-39k, albeit with some good factory rebates. I am single with no kids and I don't need a full sized truck right now, I like the maneuverability of a mid sized truck. I can fit better on these skinny dirt roads out in the country, plus I still have the utility of a truck bed. But if I had the $$$ and there was a sweet deal on a light duty truck for about the same as a mid sizer I can see how it would be tough to pass up. The truck I would love to have in the mid size class is a Colorado ZR2 crew cab, since I enjoy hunting, fishing, kayaking and camping, it would definitely get me places that my compact sedan won't. Thanks for sharing this on point review.
Thanks Forrest I'm glad you liked it!
@@MattMaranMotoring you are welcome. I always enjoy your thorough and unbiased reviews even coming from a Ford owner.
At $39,000, you're getting a Ranger XLT Super Crew 4x4 with thousands of dollars in options. If you were to just get an F150 XLT Super Crew 4x4 or even a Super Cab 4x4, you'd be blowing past $40,000 before any options. A similarly equipped F150 with the FX4 package, painted trim, Nav, etc. will be closer to $50,000. The prices aren't close at all. Also, they're two different categories of vehicle. The F150 is a much larger truck. If I don't want a vehicle that size, why would I spend $10,000 more for an F150? In reality, the appeal here is a smaller size and a much cheaper price.
Thank you! People constantly compare prices between midsize and full size trucks but they never use comparably equipped vehicles in their comments. $10,000 is 25% and that's a significant price difference.
I bet you get more discounts on the F150 to close that gab though. Still, it's quite jump to go from the Ranger to F150, they're not too comparable.
The reason why it's nearly 50k for all the same options is because the FX4 package on the F-150 forces you into upgrading engines. If you skip that package you're only at 45k even with the other options still in place. I understand not everyone wants a bigger truck, but for 5k more, you get a lot more truck, still making it the better value, like my original point was suggesting.
@@MattMaranMotoring Then it's even less comparable without the FX4 package. I don't think the base 3.3L V6 is comparable here. It really doesn't have a lot beans to it. I think the 2.7L Ecoboost would offer the same "punchiness" the 2.3L EB offers in the Ranger. An F150 XLT 4x4 with their weak N/A V6 and nothing more. You're really cutting out a lot of options just to even approach the price of the truck in this video. If you skip options on the Ranger and just settle for the XLT 4x4 with no options, you're at about $35,000, so you're still at about a $10,000 less than a comparable F150.
That has always been the allure of the ranger
That color is awesome. If Ford doesn't offer that exact same shade on the forthcoming Bronco, they'll need to be taken behind the woodshed.
I went to buy a Colorado Z71 in Orange on Saturday. Came home with an LTZ-Z71 Silverado instead. For less money. Incentives beat out everything else, imo. The new Silverado has a sport mode. I launched it and did a burnout.
You should try to snag a Silverado RST 6.2L crew cab short bed. It is a fun truck to drive.
Hopefully u didn't do the burnout in front of a cop
Josh Clontz did you get the 2019 Silverado? And which engine did you get ?
@@semiauto3148 yea. 2019. I only got the 5.3, as it was discounted well. The 6.2 is just too pricey for my budget. Even still, the 5.3 hauls ass.
Josh Clontz man. I want that truck with the 6.2 and the tail pipes that are under the bumper. In silver with black int..... but I can’t afford it. I would take the 5.3. But would rather have the bigger engine... hows the trans treating ya? Do you like how it shifts?
@@semiauto3148 me too. I may eventually procharge my 5 3 and make 600hp.
Can get an F150 cheaper. The Ranger is a total letdown. If I wanted outdated, I'd get a Frontier.
Atleast you can get a 4 cyl manual frontier for 19 grand. Cheapest ranger is over 28 grand
An F150 4x4 crewcab with similar options is about $10,000 more expensive. Don't compare this to a stripped out F150 XL or something. That's just an unfair comparison.
@@sikorski3842 actually, you're right. I had the trucks mixed up. You can get a similarly trimmed F250 for the same MSRP as a similar F150. Believe it or not. However, with incentives, you're still better off getting the 150 vs the Ranger. I haven't seen any incentives yet for Rangers in my area, while the 150 has about $7k in incentives. The Ranger is already outdated. I want to like it because I'm a Ford guy, but I just can't get behind it. Sadly, I'd buy the Colorado before the Ranger. Even the Ranger Lariat trim looks like they half assed it. Unless you live in an urban area and worry about parking in tight spots, there's really no reason to even consider a Ranger. Personal preference aside.
@@Mr_Chris77 The Rangers are also being discounted. No truck sells for MSRP, not even mid-size trucks. This dealer already has around $7,000 off MSRP on Ranger XLTs, and it's not even clearance time. You could get a well equipped Ranger for under $28,000. An F150 XLT, even after discounts, would still be much more money.
www.jarrettgordonforddavenport.com/inventory/new-vehicles/models=Ford_Ranger+vehicle-type=Truck+sort=display_price,asc
@@guod1973 wrong. ranger starts at 24300.
Matt you are spot on with this review, IT is nice you are keeping honesty in your reviews. I agree The Ranger is not priced right, your better off getting an F-150, and also I agree 90% of Americans Really only need a Honda Ridgeline, If they try it they would love the Ridgeline. I recently drove one and it is a great vehicle. It can't tow like the body on frame V8 trucks, but for most people it is perfect. Keep up the Great Reviews
Thank you, I'm glad you liked it!
I might be interested in a Ridgeline if I could get past how ugly it is
Course he'll keep up the reviews
Nah, I'll pass on buying a crossover suv with a bed. That thing is not a truck anymore than an El Camino was a truck. It's a car with a bed and just generally not worth it to any real pickup truck buyer
50% of the truck for 90% of the price... pass
If you're doing truck stuff all the time then yeah, but for daily driving and normal day to day use, these midsize trucks are super nice. So much easier to park and get around town with.
I cross shopped the F150 with the Tacoma in the fall of 2015. When comparably equipped, the real world street price of the Tacoma was 25% less. The Tacoma still tows my travel trailer very well, handles my home renovation projects with ease and my family fits inside comfortably. The Tacoma fits easily in my garage too. Why would I spend an additional $10,000 on something that I don't need?
It's more like 75% of the truck for 75% of the price.
It's best smaller truck out there. Period.
what makes you think Ford isn't Redesigning the Ranger right now?
do you think Ford is going to stick with this Old Design? why do you think Ford is keeping the production low?
there's a reason why you're Low Buck, it's because you're intellectually Lazy
I think if this guy was 6'5" 265lbs then he would like the new Ranger more, I would like the Ranger if it 5k cheaper on the low end and 10k cheaper on the high end models. At these prices, the F-150 is a no brainer.
Love my Ridgeline, unmatched practically, refinement, and drivability.
I might consider once someone helps me understand why a 4 cylinder cost this much? to have 4x4 xlt in a 4 cylinder its over 30k? Is a v8 xlt with same options a little over 60k? is so trucks are no longer for working people. I need a good dependable truck really bad and I would like to own a new one for once in my life, but its just to damn unaffordable for what you get and the depreciation. Same with Chevy. Colorado's v6 4x4 over 35k. New v8 Silverado cost close to 70? If not then why the big mark up between the mid size and full size
Try Nissan. If I were working with it everyday I'd choose a base 4cyl Frontier. I had a dealer offer me one for $17k new it was 2wd auto with a few small options, hand crank windows. I think it had keyless entry and cruise. They had red, white or silver in color for that price.
Good honest review Matt. TFLTruck, (who I swear is sponsored by Ford) will tell you that this is the best mid-size truck on the market. There is nothing special about this truck at all. There are definitely better trucks to spend your money on in this market. FYI, I believe it was Motor Trend about two months ago that tested this truck and had guys under the truck looking for broken suspension components, trying to figure out why the ride quality was so bad. It turned out that there was nothing broken.
Yea right . I own one and the ride is great. Strait and sure and I have never noticed anything out of the normal with the suspension. Smooth as a f150. And I’ve owned both. Besides if you don’t like the ride there’s always after market shocks. Fords been in the game to long . The down right truth of the matter is the Tacoma , Colorado and the Ranger are all good trucks. It’s a matter of personal preference. It seems people would rather argue then agree on anything these days. I’ve heard the same said in reviews about the Tacoma and the Colorado. So go from there. And all three trucks run about the same price when comparing options to options
35,100 for a new one with 35,000 milles on parkway ford nc... How the times have changed?
When are you going to review the new Explorer ST? Or the Palisade?
And the 2019 Ford Edge
Damn Matt, you have a really good point of view and the way your thoughts and feeling come out is very well weighted, alot of people are overly happy about cars while a minority is overly dissapointed, for me and my experience, you have your feeling stated well and just gives the correct vibes, idk how to explain it, but we'll done
Matt you need to try to do more truck reviews.
Agree
The problem is Ford doesn't want you to buy this. After incentives the f150 is almost the same price as this. It's hard to find a ranger under $32k and after incentives that's not far off an f150
My local dealer only has about $1500-2500 in discounts for the ranger. And they offer over $11k off on an f150
That's a huge discount
I think the aesthetics of this first generation leave a lot to be desired. It seems like an Aussie influenced design. It just looks too _soft_ (for lack of a better word) when you think of a pickup truck. Idk how else to describe it other than the fact that you tend to automatically recognize non-US compliant vehicles on our roads.
For instance, a Peugeot would stand out here in the US. The same could be said about American vehicles in other countries. You'd definitely spot an F-150 in the streets of Rome lets say. I'd be more interested in Gen 3 or 4 of this reintroduced Ranger. It has great potential and yet it still has a long way to go.
Until then I'm ready to buy the Jeep Gladiator [Gen 2]. However to be fair, I'm also biased towards Jeep being that I used to build custom TJ's for many years but I digress. I say Gen 2 because we also refuse to buy a first-year production run of anything, especially vehicles.
As a former tech, custom fabricator and general consumer advocate; I've been on the inside of many dealerships from Ford to Ferrari. If there's one thing I've learned, it's that you _never_ buy version 1.0 of a new product. Let them work out all the bugs and kindly allow the overeager to eat the initial depreciation. Auto manufacturers won't scrap a model after just one year of sales so there will always be a generation two and so forth. Just a friendly tip for the community.
Keep up the good work my friend.
EDITED for internal RUclips error.
Course he'll keep up the work
So I thought from the title this was going to be a pro vs con. Between the ranger and F-150. Turns out it’s just a review of the ranger
12:40 Rust already?
I love the new Ranger
Same
So do I!
loving mine
I saw one of these going down M5 yesterday and I realized why I'm not a fan... It looks just looks tired and old.
Gtfoh. Stay off the opiods.
This was a good review. At times you did seem to start the next sentence before you fished your last sentence. That is not a complaint just an observation. I test drove one of these and liked it, then priced one out in Lariat trim. It came out at $46, 570, and some basic things are missing for this kind of money. IE No memory seat function, no heated steering wheel and no power rear slider. I drive an F 150 that I like and it listed for 50K It's a Super Crew XLT with a V8. It is ruby red and I added black wheel and new tires. This truck gets an awful lot of compliments.
I am going to pursue the Ranger, and probably buy one of I can get Ford and dealer discounts totaling in the area of $7500.00. I base this on your review along with all the negative comments it inspired about the vehicle. Also there is your remark about the next update of the Ranger and then the possibility of the Raptor version. I think that down sizing along with better milage is a factor influencing my desire for this truck. They are much easier to navigate in town and parking lots than the full size F 150 Thanks again. Bill Rogan AKA dungteller.com
You should do a ranger tremor review now.
They should offer a v6, atleast in the top trim
the 2.3L Ecoboost is more Powerful than a Toyota V6, with a Superior Torque Curve
Not to mention having a superior 10-speed transmission
@@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 so a EcoBoost v6 would further that superiority
the 2.3L EB is Tuned for 87, but if you put 91 or 93 in it, then it produces 300 hp
@@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 mehh, it's just preference for me then, I'd rather a v6 in my trucks at a minimum
I use to lament the turbo 4s killing the v6s. Then I drove a turbo 4. Now I'm happy to see the turbo 4 rid the world of them. I6s were a different thing, silk smooth torque down low. Turbo 4s are dramatic but torque always.
Matt upload more frequently, this is the first time in like 2 months i see one of your vids on my notification. RUclips is not liking that.
Did you check to make sure you're signed up to receive "all notifications"? RUclips now has 3 levels which makes it unnecessarily complicated. If you hit the bell, you then have to go and manually select "all notifications" otherwise it'll only push them through occasionally. It's annoying that they complicated it.
Matt Maran Motoring really annoying because I enjoy your channel more then some, am subscribe to. But yet get more notifications from them.
Turn off notifications and turn it back on
Hank hill would approve.
Me too
Floyd Waters mmhmm
When they will release this in the philippines?
a decade ago
Big trucks are getting bigger and cost as much as a house. The new Ranger is the same size as a '91 F150 and still too expensive. Why do I want a 4' side on the bed. Please bring back the Rachero or El Camino at a down to earth price the average person can afford and still be able to park in the garage. I really miss my S-10. Currently driving a no thrills '08 Ranger hoping it can last long enough before Ford and Chevy wise up that we all don't need or want a HUGE truck (even at the mid size level).
That’s not a ranger just like the new blazer isn’t a blazer
Is the color Electric Spice?
This color is called Saber, but it does look very close to the old Electric Spice color, it's possible they just renamed it.
Pumpkin spice 😀
It’s a truck. Not your daughters Subaru. Trucks don’t need to have a bunch of toys and outlets and coolers
Tully Mckinley riiiight it's a travel vehicle and a pickup truck it's dope the way it is
that key is typical for f150 XL and superduty XL's. i've got a work 2018 XL power package and it's got that same type of key...no push button start, and the msrp was like 41k so yeah, 150's are pretty expensive too even when not fully decked.
It looks like the new Ram 1500 from the front
No mention in this review of the terrain management and trail control 4wd features in this test model. I've heard this model is very capable off road. The Honda Ridgeline looks like they bolted on an Accord to the front. The Ridgeline towing is only 3500 to 5000 lbs. But it's all a matter personal preferences.
Silverado is probably better off road
Does it have auto start stop? The F-150's started making that mandatory without an option to set it to be "off" by default in 2017 so I got a 2016.
Auto start stop is dumb
16:23 Is there suppose to be an engine cover or is it suppose to be exposed like that (wires everywhere)?
The other EcoBoost models that use this engine have covers, not sure why the Ranger doesn't.
It's exposed I think
Unfortunately it's only available in the lariat trim....not making that up!
Terrible execution by Ford. What were they thinking? If the Ranger gets cancelled again that’s it. They had a chance, hopefully they don’t screw up with the Bronco.
You're a GM fan for sure!!!
I'll take the Ridgeline for functionality.
In a nutshell you said “it’s just ok”. Lol
Good review. Placeholder is probably correct. I'd go for the Gladiator if I had to buy a midsize truck today. I could not see going from my F150 to this Ranger.
Jason Crittendon Gladiators’ are stupid expensive though
@@erickrecinos2931 don't have to be. sport S package starts about 36K. But honestly, i'd pay more for a Gladiator than a Ranger because of the offroad capabilites and the removable doors and roof.
Just ordered a '20 model! Black on black!
halogen bulbs though are easy and cheap to replace yourself. good luck doing led's on the cheap. a bulb is like what 3 bucks. If it aint broke dont fix it i say. i wish they would make a version with a stick shift and a non turbo model personally but this new ranger does look sharp in that color.
The thing with LEDs is that they last way longer. Most people never even have to replace them.
+1,000 for calling out the headlights!!
Why did they make the Ranger a full size truck?
Because that's their choice to
If the crew cab short box 4x4 Lariat was available with the 2.7 TT V6 and a manual transmission, I'd trade in my Tacoma tomorrow. I would really miss the Tacoma's composite bed though. P.S. On the Rangers that I looked at in Canada, there was storage behind and under the rear seats and the rear seat bottom did fold up.
Interesting, I tried finding stuff in the back seat but it didn't look like the seats folded at all.
I was all over southeast asia in the past few years and these things were all over the place over there
One word for the Ranger, BORING!
is that your Expert Opinion?
One word for @Jonathan, BORING!
Idk why people complain about having LED headlights and a dampened tailgate, and rear drum brakes, It’s not a luxury car it’s a truck, get over it. 🙄
I’d get a Tacoma with a manual transmission.
Cool truck but I'd rather buy a used f-150
"In line with the rest." Pretty much the story of the Ford Ranger.
$39,000 for that..... no way.
Probably can negotiate for about $35k
Bob The i love ford, but i wouldnt pay more than $30k lol overpriced for what is supposed to be a midsized truck. For this price just buy an f150
WhaddupImJohn at, that point, I'd rather buy a Tundra
Bob The true that
I prefer the smaller pickups like the ranger, tacoma, colorqdo, etc. to the bigger full-size trucks.
Those are some huge taillights 😂
Ridgeline isn't even a truck really
Hahaha well said! Ford just bring it back just to satisfy the current fanboy. In 2015..yes, it will be a benchmark for other trucks.
Got me a 2018 stx 4x4 crew cab instead, for 40k
You look good in a truck!
Thanks brother.
I don't think he's ur brother
*That interior looks like a 1990's model. XD Dang Ford! What Happened?*
what happened? it isn't a new design, - Genius
Doesn't look tht old
You must have forgotten how funky the 90s Rangers were.
I’m not a fan toy trucks.
It's rare to see Matt hate a car. But he sure does hate this one....
Worth buying? Not isn a fking crew cab and short bed configuration! Who are they selling this too, housewives and soccer moms?
what would you suggest, a Toyota or a Chevy?
@@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 For reliability and overall lifecycle - the Toyota
@@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 But hey, Chevy is now bragging that they offer a $100K+ pickup! Whoopee!
Keith Johnson - Shelby GT500 I'd have a Tundra over any pickup truck
This pickup is a disappointment and a lot of thing Ford is doing are disappointments to me.
Like the Edge
Too bad. It’s a good looking truck
16:05 :)
god bless you
if you hate the truck so much, why do a review.
That’s what reviews are generally for, to tell potential customers what the product is like. If every review was 100% positive how would they differ from commercials?
Haha I loved how you struggle to say something nice about this truck looks like 1992! 😂😂
Lol
No
Ended up with an f150 STX 4x4 SCREW. 38,000. Cheap hard plastic interior, and the size is too much. The bed is impossible to use unless you get a step ladder, pop the hood to check the fluids...samething, so tall I can't even check the oil. 4x4 with no under body protection..no thanks. Ford refuses...absolutely refuses to allow the Ranger to be great, just enough to compete, and not excel in a class it should dominate.
To answer the question no. Same price as f150 since they’re 15k off all day
Seems like no one buys F150's anymore
Leave it on the lot. Way overpriced.
Review: 2019 Ford Ranger XLT - Worth Buying Instead of F-150?
Review a Bugatti Chiron
Brand new vehicle that is very stale
Irk! Your jacket was making noises!
I would rather go with the F150 with a 3.3 v6 more room, comfort, same gas mileage and price ! The Ranger only offers a 2.3 turbo ! Not interested in a turbo so it’s a no brainer for me! the best way to buy is buy a leftover every year in July and AUG and get 8 to 10 k off the price!!!!
You guys Heard bout the charger widebody? Lol😂
I heard bout it
The styling is horrible. It's too big! Too tall, too narrow. Dated styling. It's SO expensive for a midsize truck. It's a big miss on Fords part.
I don't like the Ranger's interior either.
Road noise from the tyres! Poor fascia! This from a guy who is reviewing the biggest selling vehicle worldwide. Give us a break. Load of nonsense.
Way over priced! People buy these trucks because they're smaller and cheaper. All these new "small" trucks are the size of a full size from 10 years ago, but the price of current full size.
Ain't that the truth. Park my 2004 Silverado 1500 next to a modern Colorado and for the most part they're the same size except my bed is bigger
Matt u should be a little tougher on the reviews. Always being like “but it’s ok”. Let’s be real Matt, it’s not ok. We deserve a better ranger.
Ford is pretty cheap now. 😔
interior its unacceptable...looks like 10 years old ....ford designer are not that good! they need to hire someone from pininfarina or zagato!
This is from another country
Dude you complain more than anyone I ever heard gee its not a 75k truck
My man you too young to be dressing like your in your early 40’s
jesus chainz No he doesn’t! He dresses like he’s pushing 60.
He's probably over 40 yrs old
The Ranger is a nice truck needs a V6
It's a Ford. Naw I'll pass
I'd rather Eat Worms than Buy a Toyota
@@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 well get used to eating worms because that FORD will leave you stranded with nothing else to eat than worms. Caww caww
@@navysealsrock1725 lmao😂
Whats up with these soyboys reviewing trucks and complaining about non damped tailgates and soft touch materials, push button start etc.
Joseph Rivera the problem is that it’s 40k
Wtf is Ford doing?