Nikon D6 vs Canon 1Dx Mark III
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- This video reviews two flagship cameras: the Nikon D6 and the Canon 1Dx Mark III with mention of the EOS R5. Is the D6 the holy grail for sport photography? Is the D6 all we wanted? Can the D6 get any better? Watch now to find out.
Product links
amzn.to/3c8dwf8 Canon 1Dx Mark III
amzn.to/2Vm1Srb Nikon D6
MISTAKE: I reported that the 1DX Mark II shoots 14 frames mechanical, but can shoot 16 frames, and I claimed the D6 does not have Face Detection and eye autofocus. It does have face and eye.
Please subscribe and click the alert bell to get notifications of new videos. Your subscriptions and likes help keep this channel going.
Cited works by Unsplash
Photo by Ria Puskas on Unsplash - backdrop
Special Thanks
CanonRumors.com, Peter Gregg
Gear used in this film
Canon 70d, Canon 50 f1.2 @ f/2, Tascam DR10-L
Peter Gregg’s Right White color balance tool
Software
Final Cut Pro 10.4.7, Compressor, Canva.com, Keynote
if you jump on canon or nikon sony whatever you like you just waste your money . love my nikon d4s d3x . i still love and i dont want waste my money to upgrade my gear . it is not important nikon or canon . you are the photographer
A good photographer can produce great results with any modern camera. Both he D6 and 1DX are amazing cameras as it the D4. Many photographers do not need many of the new cameras. It is video that is largely driving new capabilities, but seeing faster frames rates trickle down to cheaper cameras is nice.
I agree the d6 is a disappointment but you have made several errors about its performance. Even the D5 had an basically had an unlimited buffer for raw files with the older and slower xqd cards. It is limited to 200 raw files by software to avoid accidental running up the shutter count if you say happened to leave it in your bag and the button got depressed with the camera powered on. Just lift and press as fast as you can and you get another 200 raw images. I don't see how the D6, with the same D5 sensor, would be slower with faster memory cards support straight out of the box! The D6 also has face and eye detect. Even the D5 had face detect and it would focus on the eye when possible.
Thanks for the correction. I posted a correction in the description. My research was flawed.Is there a way to remove the limitation in software?
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker As far as I know there is not a way to remove the limitation.
@@AnthonyWilson247 Its still a good camera. I don't think Nikon was aiming at non Nikon customers with the D6. I hope it gives them the revenue they need.
@@OrdinaryFilmmakerAgreed. Hopefully they get it together. More robust competition is good for everyone!
@@AnthonyWilson247 I totally agree. I have canon glass so I'll like get a canon, but it does not mean I hate Nikon or others. I am excited by every camera release looking to see what has been improved.
Years ago when Nikon first jumped ahead of Canon all the Canon fanboys made excuses that this was all just specs on paper and didn't mean anything until you could compare the cameras in hand. They all seem to forget this when they finally see Canon edge ahead on paper after many years. (And yes, they have only just edged ahead.) Remember, this is just one camera, and Canon has been floundering for the last 5 years and taking a serious pounding from Nikon. The forums were awash with Canon people calling for something decent from their brand and screaming to finally get a competitive camera from them again. Maybe Canon is finally fighting back.
We need to see some serious hands-on testing. Even though the Canon spec numbers look better, there really isn't that much difference between these two cameras. The D5 was way ahead of the 1DXM2 but Canon people didn't all throw away their cameras and switch to Nikon(though some surely did switch.) This is just the evolution of camera design.
Video is slowly growing with each new generation of cameras but the flagship is still a stills camera. Video people don't want to hear this but DSLR video is still only a small feature in the scheme of things. Video people keep whining about Nikons video function. But Nikons cameras sell like hotcakes even with less than stellar video.
Do you really think that Nikon has no idea what the majority of it's customers want? What is to be gained by making a big push ahead in video performance? Serious photographers are not going to sell all their equipment, buy all new cameras and lenses, and adopt an unfamiliar brand just because of some minor improvements on the other side. That would adversely affect their productivity and they're not stupid.
I'm sure the D7 or the D8 will give everyone that quantum leap they're looking for.
Watch my video coming out later tonight. For some reason we tend to align with a brand and think their grass is always greener. We expect a lot.
Hands on testing is very important. I am working as hard as I can to get an agreement with a camera company. It's tough going right now.
You also have to remember that videographers are becoming a larger stakeholder than four years ago. Most new cameras are treating video capabilities as important as photo, with exception to a few models.
Great post. Thanks for commenting.
11:10
the 1dxIII can shoot 16fps mechanical AND 20fps mechanical in liveview(not just 14fps). in addidtion to the 20fps electronic
Yes, I added it as a correction. My tongue does not always listen to my brain.
26 years shooting nothing but NIKON...been shooting with my D4S since 2014...love it. I didn’t even think about upgrading when the D5 dropped because it just wasn’t that big of an upgrade but I HOPED that the next body after the D5 would be my next upgrade...what a fool I was. The 1DXIII is everything I have ever wanted and then some. One body/5 lenses all will be traded in for store credit so that I can say goodbye to the ineptitude that is NIKON and Hello to CANON. I can not wait to start shooting with A REAL FLAGSHIP BODY. Great video by the way...
Not that long ago and I felt the same about Canon. I had the 70D and the 80D was not much of an upgrade. The 90D was good, but I was ready for full frame and the R and RP were poor performers for what I needed. What a difference six months make.
Pretty good, thorough and unbiased review. Straight to the point, no holds barred, no fluffing around the issues and development omissions. Arguments well made and concise. I like. Other viewers as well. Nikon probably doesn't. But its entirely their own blame. Competition rules.
They definitely took a different approach. The D6 is still a very good camera, but does not chine next to the 1Dx
Canon is really giving their SLR department a farewell party. Rebels can now shoot 4k, 90D with its impressive 32mp sensor, and the 1DX mk III that has "sayonara DSLRs" written all over it. And the best thing is, I don't think Canon is holding back on the R5. After the world got to see the 1D mk III in the flesh, they announced that they are ceasing EF lens development. Meaning, Canon is well aware that 1DX mk III sales are not going to be as strong for the 4 years before its true mirrorles counterpart emerges.
I'm hoping that Nikon has some secret Z 1 camera in the works or something. Lack of competition is bad for the industry in general.
And someone was saying that Canon has not developed their image sensor in a while...
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker They are right if they are talking about the past 4 years. But now we have a new 32mp APS-C sensor, a new 20mp full frame, an upcoming 8k capable full frame, possibly a new high megapixel sensor (to replace the old 5Ds and 5Dsr), and probably a 24 or 26mp for the EOS RP replacement.
You misinterpreted the EF lens announcement.
Canon did not cease development of EF. They merely state that the EF line is complete, they are now focusing on the RF lens.
Does not mean they stop EF. EF lens will continue to be developed when necessary.
@@esphilee I mean development of new glass. A yes, I am aware that they make new versions/completely new glass if demand sees it.
Thanks
Ordinary Filmmaker, but you said that the cameras can both shoot at 14 frames mechanical but let me correct - Canon can shoot 16 frames.
Mariano. Thanks. That is correct. For some reason, I got it stuck in my head that it was 14 fps mechanical.
Actually I thought so ;-)
I appreciate the correction. Not everyone is aware. I have made a note in the description.
Nikon seems going out of business. Canon seems taking over Sony's throne. Sony seems losing number 1 spot. Imo.
That's a clear description of what is happening. It will be true if Sony does not release that a7S3. Five years since the a7S2...
nawus ayipsunam one very expensive camera won’t do that.
I would not have thought that the Sony has taken the #1 spot for pro shooters. I think the Sony is popular in new, and amateur-to prosumer shooters... Not pro. ?
The top spot for mirrorless. Canon is the top pro maker and Nikon is number two. Sony doesn’t make a direct competitor for that top spot.
Going the way of the dodo.
everyone is crying here about cameras that most of us cant use them at their full potential! this is real internet war. keep at it lol
No war here, just healthy discussion. I think that is true about a lot of things. We get devices for their features and don't use most of them. We should always look at buying devices for the capabilities that they offer. This will save us from buyers remorse. It's about outcomes.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker I was referring more to the comments war, clearly one camera offers more than the other and this now, the past and the future, this competition and we should be happy about it. each year or 2 a new camera will come offering new tech we've been seeing this for the last few years now, its great but its not the end of the world when something new comes out.
Agreed Basil. We are all photographers and videographers. I have a video schedule for 1pm today on the X-T4 - I love that camera. Its great, but if the R6 gives me what I need, I get to keep my glass, otherwise, hello Fuji.
Good review of spec sheet readers who know not much about photography!
As someone experienced both, video aside, Nikon d6 is a better camera for its niche purpose although the gap is not huge
This client isn't demanding video. The problem with providing video features is that invariably, when they provide top features for photography, they feel compelled to pump up the video features (and increase the price accordingly). I want top photo features without the clutter that is video. HD is plenty for 99% of all non- professionals.
Companies are always focused on delivering shareholder value before customer value. They are always looking for an excuse to charge us more. We should not take credit for that ;)
I sure you never touch any pro camera form Nikon. The 200 limit in continuous shooting is for preventing accident pumps on the shutter release when you may forget to turn off the camera in a bag so you won't burn your shutter. When shooting if you hit 200 limit just lift up your finger and press it again, there is no buffer to be clear.
What then is the actual limit if you were to release and press again?
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker on my D4 it takes about 1 sec to clear a buffer after 5-6sec shooting I never go longer than that so I cannot tell for others. However, You can resume shooting at any time whether or not the camera clearing the buffer.
1Dx3 can take 16fps with mirror. 2 more than D6.
1Dx3 can take 20fps electronic. 9.5 more than D6
1Dx3 can take 20fps mechanical mirrorles. 20fps more than D6
Very true, but actual will mean more. How accurate will each be in continuous AF.
Ordinary Filmmaker,
It is not Canon’s normal practice to put something that is not working perfectly in their flagship.
Their pro camera just works. They do not need 2 seconds to startup, 5 seconds if you have battery swap. They make sure their battery last, their sensor does not over heat and stop in the middle of a shoot. The sensor does not degrade over time. And their shutter mechanism works even under subzero condition. So cold that even LCD screen stop functioning, they still keep shooting. (OVF does not freeze in cold.)
I like that about canon. Most of their cameras just work. My 70D has been in -20 conditions, heat and keeps on going.
Why not buy a video camera and then take out stills? 😂
Cool comparison, thanks, one of the best (based on the data available back in Feb 17th). - What I am missing in all comparisons I found: how does the sensor's dynamic range of the 1DX III compare against the D6 ones. Nikon has always been much better concerning this point. - Honestly, what I have been most disappointed on the D6 is no update to the sensor. It's the same like in the D5, the slightly advantages are introduced by the processor. Nikon could have spent at least a BSI sensor. - FYC: I have the D500 and the D850, both have the same pixel pitch. The D500 makes awesome images, but the D850 has a BSI sensor and you may see this in the images. I always shoot 14 bit lossless compressed NEF to the XQD and JPG superfine to the SD card (concerning slots, D500 and D850 are identically equipped) on both cameras. So I can perfectly compare 😉
Just so people don't think I'm ragging on the RUclips channel. I'm 58years of age. Back in the 70s I was shooting a Canon AE1 at the camel supercross in the Astrodome. Indoors. Also many times I've shot the Frame NHRA super national s. You will find my photos enlarged on the walls at Houston raceway Park.
One thing I learned about shooting film and manual. It doesn't matter how expensive a camera you got mirrorless or not. If you can't pan a subject go home. There's a reason diamond p photography took me under their wing. Go back to the basics and buy a D6 and stop worrying about all the I and face tracking. I've got a Nikon d90 that I turn off the AF on. I shoot manual with it. People rave about the great photography. Look how old that camera is. And guess what unlike Sony the internal parts are not obsolete in 6 months. Nikon takes care of their customers and always have. So does Cannon. It's in my opinion that Nikon makes Superior lenses to Cannon. And I will never buy another Sony product ever again for a really good reasons.
I'd say it depends... for video shooters, AF matters especially with moving subjects. It makes shooting on a one man show much easier. For stills, It's a combination. Manual gives you the focus point dead on every time, but for wildlife, eye detection matters. Still manual is a skill still needed in video and stills. Forgetting how to pull manually will leave one with less than stellar shots. Thanks for your comment Troy. I hope others learn from it.
I used to shoot a canon ae-1 program. You can autofocus with it since it has a split prism to help autofocusing, but in digital cameras, autofocusing manually seems nearly impossible without changing to a similar prism. If you can focus without one quickly, that’s very impressive.
I don't think the D6 is as big of a disaster as many people lead it on to believe but that may be because I shoot sports. The Canon only beats it in 3-4 features. Every other feature is very competitive. Sure it is lackluster in many categories but a handful of the features that people are raving about the 1Dx mk3 on have been native to Nikon for a while.
I was hoping to have one by now but the "worldwide fiasco" shot my sales in the foot...
LOLOL As a Commador Amiga user....What did you do, switch to the Atari 800 or did you go with the Apple IIc? OLOL
The Atari 800 was a great computer, better than the Commodore 64. But the creator of the Atari 800 was also the creator of the Amiga. People moved around a lot back then ;)
I never ever thought i would say it Canon, you're going the right way, I been nikon since i started photography and never thought about leaving until this past year. Sony made massive strides ahead(in my field) and now canon is catching up. Nikon for me is presently disappointing, but little i can do, but wait for nikon to decide if they are in the game or following the game. My next season start after ending in July is december, so i hope by sep/october there is something out to cover me, if not then i'll be one of the Churn to Sony/Canon again depending on their offerings(if that buffer issue had been resolved on Sony's i would have already swapped i think). Nikon at present is just a sheep not a shepherd., needs to stop being reactionary, it needs to become Proactive, in development and telling customers how its see's the future. If we got lens details for next 2 yrs tell us what we have on bodies.
What is it that you do with your gear? IS the current gear not capable enough for your current workload? I was looking at having Canon last year. I felt then the way you feel now. But six months made a difference. I am surprised at how Nikon did not even try with this one.
Have you used the D6?
Has Jared, Ken, Ken Rockwell, Tony, Taylor used the D6?
Nope lol
Nope, but it does not take hands on to see that the difference between these two cameras is significant. The D6 is still a great camera, but if I had a D5, I would not be interested in upgrading over the D6.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker This is where I somewhat disagree. I don't see the D6 as a camera for simply an individual. I see it as one for an agency that buys 20, 30 cameras, who's covering multiple athletes at the same time via DSLR remotely and then asking who'd benefit the most from transfer speeds.
Being able to cut down :50s to :30s worldwide is major.
Regardless if the mark iii can shoot 1000 raw files, the mark ii from the mouth photographers was already unlimited when shooting raw.
The better camera is the Canon on both still and video.
I asked myself why would Nikon include jpg + jpg recording and offer 2mp + 8mp files (internet + tv/print) at 30fps or 60fps regardless of it using the electronic shutter, if the camera doesn't have rolling shutter was it worth it?
90% of those photographers at the Olympics are shooting Large Fine jpg files.
I think it does require on hands with the D6 for its workflow upgrade. The use of a global time sync is major when you're using 5 to 20 cameras remotely and the director is managing 1500 photographers.
No one is going to use the D6...well, except for those paid to use it.
Some reviewers say that 1DX III autofocus is on par, or even better than the Sony A9 II. The new sensor on the 1DX III also has improved dynamic range and low-light performance! I can't wait to see how the R5 and the rumored R6 will turn out later this year!
Me too. I fear the R5 will be too much for me. I am looking forward to see what the R6 is all about.
I don't believe the Nikon D6 is a disappointment. Case and point. Everyone who bitches about the video capability is shooting the RUclips videos with a different camera. And I'm to take your advise over specs comparison between 2 cameras. I want to see it for myself. Shoot the video with the camera your comparing.
I get a kick out if all the camera companies holding these expensive cameras while the movie is shot with a RED.
Then I go to RUclips. And the D6 video comparison is shot with. D850.
WHY ?
I'm not here to see the d850 I logged on RUclips to see the D6 video tape you.
I'm sitting in front of a Panasonic VT50 plasma awaiting.
True, but it's not being well marketed. Nikon needs to get out there and communicate.
I am been in this field (photography) since 1979, when I start shooting with nikon cameras I felt I had the best cameras, when I enter the digital field with a d300 it was my big mistake. I give nikon a 2nd chance with the d810, not bad but realy dissapointed.
As you mention, this cameras are not for video, studing nikon cameras, for me d850 is better than d6 but not, not even dreaming better than my sony a7iii. I got tired comparing trying to make a better picture with my nikon cameras but I can't, sony is sharper, warmer, better contrast and much better exposure. About the d6 not even crazy will waste money buying this camera. Honestly I know Canon is much better than nikon in all aspects, soon I will switch completly to Canon, I am sick of nikon.
Nikon is a smaller company with a much smaller budget, but this will be Canon's year, unless Sony stages an upset.
D6 vs 1Dx3 is inappropriate it seems. D6 vs R5 is more like it.
Good point, But as I said in the video, the D6 is a minor upgrade. People might find the video a little too boring.
Dont forget the focus points all in the middle. In 2020 thats really poor.
I just briefly touched on that. TO me the biggest issues is how behind the 1Dx it is. We do not need to get into the details to see that.
I have the D5 it's terrible for video autofocus, it looked so good in the D5 official promo. It still takes a good picture but I totally prefer using my Sony A7r3. D6 is very disappointing, wont be buying one
Did you buy the D5 primarily for Photo or Video, or do you use it in both equally?
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker sports photography but planned on using it as a B cam occasionally. Takes great stills 😉
@@siddallj I can see why you are disappointed in the video capabilities.
Nikon is not going out of business, so stop this nonsense! D6 has't been design to impressed the buyers. Nikon focusing on mirrorless systems which is explains why they did't invest in a D6.
It's that simple. Just because they had decided not to spend a tons of money to develop in new a DSLR -D6 which would rule the market , in a fast growing mirrorless world, does't mean they are going out of business. Actually what they doing is very smart. In the next 2 years there will be amazing Nikon mirrorless will be introduce and finally we can have a pro-pro mirrorless which will stand up to the competition.
They might very well come out with a very good mirrorless camera. The D6 is still a very good sports camera. What Nikon is doing is not necessarily smart, but it is strategic. They have limited options and are doing the best they can. But lack of results is not proof that they will produce positive results in the future. Canon is focusing on their mirrorless platform too. Ten lenses in 1.5 years, nine more this year and two more ESO RF bodies and yet they still managed to produce the 1DX. I would not exactly call this nonsense. However, I really do hope the next mirrorless from them will get customer excited - Nikon fans and non Nikon fans alike.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Nikon is going out of business is just nothing but nonsense. People tend to assume negative things when they see something what they don't like and then starting to craping in their pants.
Nikon will produce great mirrorless in the future.
Yes, Canon launch the greatest DSLR ever but that does't mean Nikon could't have done it, they just decide no to, and that was a smart move. Those Nikon sport shooters already have the D5 which is excellent camera. Nikon officials had decide not to spend years for developing something what more likely can't sell for long time because they putting all their focus on mirrorless system and the next pro mirrorless will be out perform the D5 or D6 pretty much at all.
Canon had to put something to the market, because what they did in the past 24 Month was not really great, far is camera bodies.
Nikon has launched two great full frame mirrorless body and 13 lenses just for the Z system in the past year and a half, that also very impressive.
This year will be Canon's year but I think Nikon will have the answers for everything which will proof that fact Nikon is not going out of business at all.
ALL FACTS BRO
How close did the D6 come to your predictions?
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker 0 bro check out my last video I did
Why are we even comparing these two cameras
The price
I think I stated that in the video...
No contest...the 1DX3 is Godzilla and the D6 is Rodan...sure it’s a Kaiju but...is it though?!
I think that's about right.
Ordinary Filmmaker you mean to tell me you went back to this comment just to say that 😂😂😂😂
How can they compare when nobody knows the exact specs just yet?
If you watch the video, you will see how I compare. It's a conceptual view. won't be able to do a logical view until both cameras have been out in the wild.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker ok
I suspect Nikon closed most of their repair centers and put the spare parts inventory into the D6. At least the old parts did not go to a landfill.
It's mostly the D5 with new labels soon them. If the update had been released as a firmware update, there would not have been a lot of fuss over it. I really hope they have a mirrorless equivalent that is much better than this and ready for release soon.
nice video.
its funny - how Nikon defends the D6 AND HONESTLY...the D6 is basically NIKON buying the cripple hammer from canon and using it on their own system. the D6 being a lack / missed potential for what it could be. and people may defend the nikon saying its a photo shooter, well great , but then why is the photo shooting capabilities also not as good or up to "standard"?? and im sure there's no answer for it.
the nikon defenders are defending BAD BUSINESS practice from the companies that build the products. the same way when the canon bodies were first release the criticisms were legitimate (NOT HAVING 24P for example, and many of the filming/vlogging channels DEFENDED IT. that's crazy. as if they are paid chills and does not want to upset their business partners)
only a year later with canon updates, release of professional 1.4 grade lens , and reducing the price of the canon bodies is when more and more people are picking up canon, and good on them. canon deserves it. but imagine there was no back lash? people give up on standards and let canon do what ever, charge what ever. the body cost wont go down, they wont give more features/updates. at least canon is on track for their next line of professional bodies.
I only hope Nikon can do the same and not fall under. if its not their camera bodies, all thats left in 2020 is their new lens line up and im certainly looking forward to it. for nikon's sake.
This time around, I found a lot of canon users that were far from defending Nikon over the D6. Watch Theroai Aphophasis (sp). He really dug into them...
I took a little more effort this time using B roll and added a custom intro and outro. What did you think of the Intro?
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker i liked the intro, though not so much the voice over. Peter greg got that "Warm Family" voice over haha
I think you could keep it simple and use a type of song you like and make that song over time in all your videos a "theme" people will remember you by.
what ever song if its a soft peaceful one could be used as a back ground sound as you speak.
but this is the first time, maybe listening to the voice over will become more natural but in first impression I liked the visuals over the voice.
@@JayGrapherTh A type of... don't keep me guessing. I'll play with it a bit more for the next video. Voice overs are not expensive. Peter said he does not remember who did his or I would have chosen him.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker ok i watched the intro/outros again.
I THINK its just too long on both.
just the last phrase just kinda made the whole thing drag out too long.
no need to do anything to the beginning of the speech as well i think , just removing the ends.
and some "theme" music you like .
since you reference the camera conspiracy channel a bit, its the same theme where we know the kinds of music he use cause its there in every video.
hope this helps.
(like it gets TOO Descriptive at the end phrase that i think could be removed)
Unfortunately Nikon is becoming the BlackBerry of the camera industry.
Let's hope they have a great mirrorless coming out. Do you have a Nikon now?
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Actually I haven't owned a Nikon since a F4. Learned on a Pentax K1000, saved my money for a Canon T50 and next was the original EOS650. Got back into Photography 2yrs ago and went back to my roots of Canon, they did me well. Started with the 6D and some hobbyist sports shooting so moved to the 7D Markii and made the jump to the 1DX Markii. I use all three now in their own role. 6D for sideline shooting 7D for 100-400 zoom because of the crop and 1DX with my F2.8's. So have my own Trinity of Canon camera bodies. Nikon's are just as amazing but some tale tale signs of things to come and not coming.
Well said Paul. It's just luck I got a canon instead of a Nikon. My brother had a Canon so I got one... You know how that goes. Today I am a little wiser ;)
Nikon D6 has eye auto focus!
I am sorry if I got that so wrong. Can you provide me more details. I did research and was told it did not have it. I don't like making mistakes.
@@OrdinaryFilmmaker Not eye AF but Face AF from the PDAF sensor. Canon also has the same feature but they also have DPAF-powered live view eye and face AF with several tracking presets.
What about the A9 and the A9ii?
I had initially referenced the A9, but it seemed more like a third wheel. We all know the A9 II is a good camera. The real story is the once strong rivalry between these two flagship cameras. Never have they been so far apart. I want to focus on them.
Amiga forever 😎
Only Amiga makes it possible!
Yes. Nikon D6 really disappointed. It shows Nikon suffers in financial crisis. Really great video covering all the possibilities and specs.
Thanks. I think Nikon was counting on Canon providing boring updates as well. They must feel gutted. The D6 is not everything we wanted in a sports camera.
Nikon thinks that their existing customers are Stupid........ by providing a smokescreen....... good luck Nikon. I am disappointed!!
I don't think they are being nefarious. I think they are so hurting for cash flow that they are trying to increase cash flow to existing customers that are unlikely to switch due to a huge lens library.
I've been a sports photographer shooting on a Rebel T6i for 3 years. Those sports photos in the D6 promo video? Nah, I'll stick with my Rebel thanks.
...although I am going to get an EOS R6 because I want something with kickass video
Give a pro any tool and s/he is capable of great things than an amateur with the best kit. Look at my channel. I am still an amateur, but trying to get there.
I like that I can come here for no BS, well researched news. Some of the bigger channels (who I also follow and love) seem to have a sniff of commercial-entertainment, which is fun but it's harder to take seriously.
nikon is on a steady decline, canon is finally revealing all the stuff they've been working on and trying to gain back the market share it lost to sony with their awesome lenses and new bodies.
They are not out yet. Many were counting canon out too until the 1DX and R5 announcements.
Fiat vs Porsche
Looks that way. Do you own either D5 of 1Dx
Ordinary Filmmaker Have had from one 1Dmk4 two 1DX one 1DXmk2 and just borrowed/tested the 1DXmk3
I’m in to medium format now..
So I will not own my own mk3, but can borrow when ever I need..
I’m using Phase One and the Fujifilm GFX100 this days, and the form factor on the GFX100 and 1DX is so alike, that the GFX felt good in my hands👍
Sorry for the bad grammar, don’t speak English
"Photo only cameras got panned"
Do you remember Nikon Df?
Yes, it was a serious camera for serious photographers. Video was never not he table. That was 2013, this is 2020. The market is very different.
The Nikon D6 should been match the specs of the Canon 1dx iii come on Nikon
1dx mark ii is a better option!! Tean d6
They should have tried a little. It's certainly not the holy grail.
16mins of ranting against Nikon ;)
That is not a fair comparison. Nikon D6 is an ugly and unwanted turd muffin. The Canon 1DX Mark III is a real camera people want. No good. That is the beginning of the end of Nikon.
If a camera gave me all the specs I needed, I would not care what it looked like. Its all about the outcomes. Remember, the D6 is still a very capable camera. My beef is that the D6 is not much of an upgrade over the D5.
Ordinary Filmmaker The D6 is for 2015, not 2020. It looks like Nikon believed they are the only ones on the market and consumers take what they offer. This time is over. It won’t happen.
your face is not important..we cant see the chart.
Odd comment...
So much hate from some guys in basements. Technology seen today on youtube is already old :)).
I don't understand your point? Any technology once released is old. That's a given. Always has been.
Ordinary Filmmaker I don’t understand these bait and click videos either. Canon hasn’t improved it’s sensor in years.... technology is always evolving and it’s impossible to have something mind blowing every single day
If you are going to troll me Gabriel, at least do a better job of getting your facts straight. :)
Point 1: these click and bait videos. The title, description and art indicate this video is about a compare of the D6 to the 1Dx mark III. It is there fore it is not bait and click.
Point 2: Canon has not improved it sensors over the years. Last October 90D came out with 32.5MP sensor - largest mp APS-C sensor to date. I could go on about the new sensor canon has announced will be in the EOS R5, but there is no need.
Point3: Technology is always evolving... it's impossible to have something mind blowing every day. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. This point is irrelevant and off topic.
My opinion on comparisons. Nikon shooters with Nikon gear will continue to shoot Nikon and Canon shooters will shoot Canon. No different than the Chevy,Dodge and Ford driver or Apple vs PC for photo editing. You choose what you best feel comfortable with that will do the work for your customers and if a company goes away then you move on to another company.
Ordinary Filmmaker you state some opinions on financial status and cameras. Nobody feels angry with the cameras Nikon has today other than pixel peepers. The way you state opinions as facts based on one single camera released by Canon without showing major improvements on that outdated Canon sensor make you a troll more than anything. Nikon needs to improve it’s mirrorless focusing system and other things but we live in a time when we have great options when it comes to photographic cameras. Stop stating your opinions as facts!