Well tvs back then did use actual electron guns to fire electrons at a phosphor screen (and your face). That said, it wasn't really dangerous then because of the electron gun either. It's just not great for your eyes long term, I think mostly due to the even brightness. Let's be honest though, we are all going to need glasses/contacts/laser correction at some point. The world is far to reliant on screens now. Hopefully someone comes up with a solid bionic eye replacement. I want night vision, thermal vision, and video display all built into my eyeballs. 😂
The XReal designs the lens in a way that makes it appear as if it were a few meters away. That's why people with near sighted vision have to use their contacts or prescription attachment to use them. They're great if you want to avoid myopia.
It’s just a minor improvement with newer Sony mini OLEDs and slightly better frame. Xreal has to do way more to support the original Air and their half baked Beam that’s incapable of handling its actual use case to be taken seriously. If you own Xreal Air, just skip 2 unless you can sell the old one for near retail price.
I have Viture glasses and they are just great! I use it all the time when playing Switch especially games with decent graphics like TOTK since its much better than Switch's 720p screen. The color-changing film is literally black magic...I shocked everyone when I showed it to them.
Good review, but given the price and the electrocromatic issue, can you compare the the xreal2 or the xreal2 pro. The features and price points align more closely.
Год назад+1
have no manical difference in version xreal air vs air2 pro bro , only bes feature was the bightness control
What do you think of the Viture neck band. So far the only draw back is that it has to be connected to wifi for a lot of it's compatibility, but it really makes a lot of those accessories unnecessary.
I think the last video I saw on cnet they did of the xreal air was after the company changed their name … and cnet was still using the old name for the whole video. And now they’re using the old product.
I love my xreal air the only downside for me is i wear prescription glasses for distance so i have to use my contact lenses in order to use my xreals. I wish it had the adjustable focal dials instead of the prescription lens attachment which gone run you $150 or more extra, Seems like the new xreal 2 pro's have same design.
@fgerv my optometrist office tried to charge me like $220 to put my prescription in my xreal insert, say it's a special glass that have to be cut or whatever.
I was able to get prescription lenses from HOSVR, still labelled as Nreal last time I checked. I think it was a sale but they are still pretty fairly priced. The only thing was I had to put the lenses into the frame provided by Xreal, which can be a bit fiddly. I'm both short sighted and have astigmatism so having the inserts was a must for me. I've worn contacts in the past but for some reason I've always had trouble looking at screens with them - though these contacts are daily disposables so I don't know if people with longer-lasting contacts have the same issue.
@thomasshaver1569 i have the prescription len attachment already, but getting my prescription in them my eye doctor facility trying to charge me an arm n a leg well over $150
These are the Xreal air pro and Viture Pro. The non-pro versions, which he has in the title, don't have chromitic displays. For a CNET reviewer, this is a MAJOR oversight.
@fgerv you are good at answering a question I did not ask. I am only asking about STANDARD 3D BLURAY MOVIES. Content on the internet and iOS are irrelevant.
120HZ? 60HZ? Resolution? I mean I could look it up on their site but it would have been nice to know :D Alot of time the quality of these displays is so low its better to just not use them.
I feel the rokid max should be compared it's the company that started it. And the max is considerably better. Being hdcp compliment . Bigger screen and amazing audio
I do like you're review BUT I do have a few issues with it. 1st like the viture's mobile dock the xreal does have the xreal beam which you didn't talk about. Also xreal came out with the xreal air2 and xreal air2 pro (and these has the same dimming feature as the viture). This would have been a better comparison
Anyone uses Viture with Steam Deck? I have heard and seen some shaddy images on reddit, but it seems like ventilation on the Deck is blocked with the Viture mobile dock mount...
I don't want internal battery, lighter and you can use external. But the real problem is needs an app for 3dof rotation. You can likely bend the frames a little bit though.
I can't get with the smaller display of the Virtures. I just got the Legion Glasses and coming from the Xreal 1, it was a big difference. I'm just use to that 201" display, opposed to the 120' display size of the Virtures and Legion Glasses. It makes a huge difference.
You will likely see more applications work for the Viture glasses. Xreal prohibits the developer community from being able to develop software to compliment there platform. Custom software/applications for Xreal require there Nebula software to be installed on your device. And the list of devices that support Nebula is very limited. for PC users if you check there website not even windows is supported for nebula and has been like this before I can remember. If you choose to use these with your phone Nebula mixed with the glasses will drain your battery faster than your wallet at Disney land.
I only really play World Of Warcraft, I wonder if either of these glasses are compatible with playing WoW from a gaming laptop dis DisplayPort compatibility?
If they were wireless or atleast didnt need to conect to switch directly but have a dongle on switch and portable battery for the glasses i would get em
all other reviews I have seen suggest xreal has better colour, clarity and sound. why do you say that viture is better? you need to explain in more detail
my experience was the opposite, the Viture are much better for me. The only thing is the screen is a bit smaller but at least the edges arent a blurry mess
@@kom17 I've got the Nreal glasses (before they changed the name to XREAL) so it could also be the quality control wasn't that good back then. I recently got the Viture in an auction only because the price was very attractive and got really impressed by the quality, the magnetic cord is really nice and the way it's designed doesn't seem to "pull" as much as the xreal. The quality of the glasses themselves is great and doesn't feel like cheap plastic is going to break at any moment. The dials to adjust in case you have myopia (I wear contact but not all the time) as well as the electrochromic film are very nice touches. Overall a really nice piece of tech. I'm pretty sure if I upgrade my glasses in the future it'll be a new gen of the Viture ones as opposed to a new gen of the XREAL ones
I see AR Glasses and Headsets being very efficient and possible revolutionary in certain medical settings... Imagine being able to do open heart surgery with the patients vitals in your distant line of sight, or even an enhanced close up image of what you're doing. For consumers... I don't see much except for maybe Navigation via GPS guided directions... or enhanced vision or AI assisted prompts for people with low vision disabilities. I don't want my FaceBook or messages in my eyes, I want relevant, helpful information for the specific task, when I need it. I want AR to assist me, not distract me or draw me in about the latest news or Amazon Lightning Deal.
The air 2 pro are incredible compared to the air 1. Air 2's image is more sharp and bright yet somehow the optics being smaller made the image noticibly larger for me on the air 2 pro. Electrochromic is a must after using it. Somehow the 100 percent blocks out all diffused light yet allows light about 2.5 ft away to still come through very dimly but somehow clear. Its completely black yet phone is visible along with peoples movements around me. The convenience of the dimming is emense on planes and i use this every time i fly to either do work or watch a movie which looks damn near 4k with the combined resolution of each eye. Viture is over rated considering its greater brightness is due to the image being much smaller in addition to terrible contrast. Lastly viture is only 60hz refresh rate which is not ideal for competative games like call of duty.
I just bought these during the Amazon Prime day sale and have sent them back. I am shortsighted and these were my first pair of XR glasses. I chose these because of the built in dials to adjust for short sightedness. The problem is, the virtual screens would be sharp but all surrounding "see through" areas would be blurred due to my short sightedness. At no fault of the device, it doesn't work for me as I am unable to see my physical keyboard clearly nor my laptop screen (for extended virtual screen workspace). Having said that, Skywalker app for MacOS is pretty cool, allowing 3 side by side screens in different layouts.
It's too bad they don't have selective darkening so that only those areas that are lit up by the virtual screen are darkened by some select ratio. A great technology, and honestly it solves a lot of problems, but it's not quite mature yet.
The Xreal air 2 pros do have that technology. He compared the Viture to an older model Xreal. The new model has the electro chromatic darkening lenses.
Год назад
@@thomasshaver1569 mm this is only en the cover lens , no in the prismatic or screen, because is a a reflection, are tecnologies distincts
Can I still connect my earbuds so that I won't be using the speakers on the glasses? Cause when I'm on an airplane the speaker part is not a good idea.
1080p is unacceptable for me for anything with text/code/vector graphics. Quest 3 is a much better deal given the specs/price, but I don't like added weight and that I have no interest in the metaverse. After trying Xreal/Viture/Rokid for quite a while, I'd wait until these offer 4k+ resolution.
Put aside text/code: I agree that the Quest 3 is a better deal, the important caveat being that it has far fewer pixels per degree (PPD), so not well-suited to reading text/code.
Год назад
yeah i am a programer , this glasses will be a real help , the dioptrias is a very usefull feature , but que resolution is something poor for me, i have a 49" monitor , would be really fantastic get a similar widescreen aspect ratio 32:9 o 16:9 etc
@, agreed. Even just something with the resolution of the GOOVIS G3 MAX (2560x1440, 46 PPD), but with the "glasses" form factor (ability to see desk, comfort) would be great. The Immersed Visor sounds very cool, but I'm worried they're "biting off more than they can chew". Also the 43 PPD is sort of moving in the wrong direction, even 50 PPD isn't great.
That's a HUGE flaw in the marketing if they don't add functionality to get a first person view of what they actually do. I'll call it right now - this product will fail simply because of that lack of foresight.
I fail to see how the iPhone 14 not having a now standard USB-C port, or Nintendo failing to include a functional USB-C port, is at all XReal or Viture's fault. A little like blaming Tesla for not supporting gasoline refueling at their Supercharger stations.
They say these work as productivity devices. A giant monitor for your laptop. You’ve not really done this at all or spoken about working for a couple days with this as your monitor. I’m going to assume that they don’t have the battery or comfort for this to be an option.
@@fgerv awesome! I’d love to hear more about what that’s like for you. I’m a software engineer. I’ve been considering these different kinds of virtual monitor devices and so far they all seem bad. I have a friend who has been doing VR and AR work for over 2 decades. I have another friend who is the head of VR (also working with AR tech and devices) for Lucasfilm. Both of them have ALL of the hardware available (sitting in boxes in their offices). And after talking to them, both individuals and their coworkers do all their work on real monitors and only put on AR/VR hardware to test specific things. I find this extremely telling. * What kind of work do you do? * Do you work with your glasses? * For how many hours a day do you work with your glasses? * Do you use this as your primary display device for your work? * What issues do you run into? * What would you need for this (or something like it) to be your primary display system to do your work? If something like this or the Meta pro visor or the Apple VR thing is going to be feasible for productivity instead of just being a toy … I feel like it needs to be a preferred way to work.
@@fgerv I just saw a pretty detailed review of these glasses. They pointed out a lack of sharpness around the edges that makes reading text pretty much impossible. They were also able to demonstrate the lack of sharpness with a camera on the screen in the glasses. These do not appear to be good enough to work on. I’m a software engineer. Everything I do is on screen and clarity matters. It also seem like the “120 inch screen at 3 meters” claim makes it a 24inch screen on a desk. So, a mundane monitor is larger. And, I use two of those. So, it’s WAY less screen size and the image quality is too poor to read text at the edges. I feel like I have my answer.
Companies have been trying this for the past 20 years. Still unsuccessfully. Ugly, bulky, too many cables. Same issues. Resolution has improved the rest is just as bad.
Another video like thousands out there. Hey man, can you expand it to something like software development using these glasses? This would be different and would share very important info about the product.
@@3web3 no, sadly I have not. All the videos on this matter are the same. I reached out some creators (as I did here, but in a more polite manner than this one), some said that would look on it but nothing till now.
@@ThugLifeModafocah....have you had any luck finding a good video for software development. I have no interest in the gaming aspect that everyone seems to review but need these to partially take the place of sitting in a chair at a desk all day. I have been looking a zero gravity workstations but these are unbelievably expensive and was hoping something like this would be a sufficient replacement. I would just like to know if these are being used by anyone strictly for work purposes and how they are when you are looking at text and multiple monitors for hours on end. I also wear glasses to see at distance but don't use them when I am at my desk for work so not sure if I would even need to prescription inserts.
@@sb6450 my needs is exactly like yours, including the zero gravity thing. Sadly, zero info about this. Some video creators answered me saying they would check but then, nothing. I got a response once from another viewer saying that text in these glasses is not so good. So, no lucky so far. I guess that we gonna need to wait apple vision pro to get launched to have something usable (I really believe that it will be awesome to development). It will be expensive, but at least not so expensive as zero gravity chairs.
I’m happy I already invested hours into watching other reviews. It’s not okay to compare the older generation of a company’s products and not mention that everything you mentioned was addressed and fixed in the new/current model the company sells. This seems like you were paid to promote one product over the other, and I don’t say that lightly because doing that without informing your audience would destroy your credibility. You didn’t share the other company’s adapter that’s similar either though, so this is just very misleading and alarming. Why would you compare a current generation product to a last generation product? Why would you only share one company’s accessories in the same category? Why would you not mention there is a new updated product that addresses your concerns?
They need to come up with a wireless connection will be a major upgrade, and also an internal battery...i mean if your guna make something this high tech why not give it all the best features...?🤔🤔 its kinda pointless if you have to stay that close..might as well just look at the actual screen thats much larger
Nice review, but the X-Real beam solved most of the problems mentioned, plus it ads more features and a 320 inch screen. The x-real 2 pro has better audio quality, brightness, and includes electro chromic lenses, plus they're lighter and have improved balance and nose cushions. You should do your research. 😅
Do your research as well, 320 inch is pure overmarketing while FOV stays the same...Viture already have better audio quality, brightness, and electro chromic lenses that was copied by xreal
@@sergekonevsky “copied by xreal” come on now… that’s like saying ford copied back up cameras from Chevy… its a feature that as a consumer you would expect products like these to have. Instead of commenting like a negative, applaud xreal for adopting it. And I don’t understand why everyone is even using audio quality as a comparison point. You are so limited by the nature of how the sound is being delivered to begin with… if you want good audio quality that will match the visual experience you’re gonna need nice earbuds or over ears. To me the audio comparison is negligible.
@@thomasshaver1569 Probably because people like you who tolerate this kind of copy, either work or support for this kind of company, so that companies with such low behaviors still exist.
@@sergekonevskyFunny how iPhone users are fine with such practices, when Apple announces "groundbreaking functionality" that has existed in other platforms for years. All works of art and culture (including technology) are derivative in nature, so "copying features" is a moot argument. I worked at an R&D facility for a major car manufacturer, and we had vendors regularly come and display tech that wasn't seen by consumers for > 5-10y minimum. My point is that unless a tech is proprietary and built in house (rare), all of these manufacturers have access to the same OEMs, making it a question of cost/profit/integration. Another example is Monitors/TVs and Memory (RAM). While there are a vast amount of brands designing/selling these products, there are less than 5 major manufacturers of LCD panels and flash memory that all those companies buy from...meaning a $2k TV could be using the same LCD panel as a $200 one.
@@sergekonevsky dude everything you’ve ever bought was a recycled idea… people like you are so near sided and have such a limited mind that it’d be a waste of my time to explain the depth of the meaning of the quote “there is no such thing as a new idea”
Eh, neither. They're kinda gimmick glasses. The screens are good, but the design is lacking. Image is too small and the frames get in the way, blocking part of the image. You'll just constantly be reminded and annoyed by the frames unless you're in the dark. I think these are good glimpses at what the future will be. Also, not that many devices support them.
Wow thank god an expert on the biology of the human eye chimed into the discussion, can you explain why this is bad for our eyes? Or are you just imagining?
Don't buy any AR/Display glasses. Unless you have a small head or you are a child(not an adult child). You need to know the IPD of your eyes and the distance between the screens of the AR/Display glasses before you buy a set. It's funny you watch reviews of AR/display glasses, the reviewers look like they are cross-eyed because the screens are set so close together. These reviewers are clueless to why the screen looks blurry on the outer right and left sides. The outer sides look blurry because there is no IPD/PD setting and the screens are set too close together. All the glasses look like they are made for a kid or an adult with a small head. The quest 2 has three settings IPD 58mm, 63mm, and 68mm. The quest 3 has a IPD setting with a range of 58mm - 71mm. I hope all the AR/Display glasses brands read this!
I wonder if any of the smart glasses like the smart glasses in this video will connect to the backbone controller to my phone while I have my wired headphones connected to the backbone controller for playing games. I also wonder about the same thing about connecting my wired headphones to the headphone jack from my sony xperia 1 iv android phone to get 0 latency audio and plugging in any of the smart glasses to the usb c port from my phone. My sony phone supports video out from the usb c port. On my phone I use a 3.5mm auxiliary splitter for connecting my sennheiser hd 600 open back headphones to the 3.5mm aux splitter and my rode lavalier go mic from it's 3.5mm port to the same aux splitter for 0 latency audio for gaming. I set it up this way so I can use my wired headphones from it's 3.5mm port and my wired mic from it's 3.5mm port both at the same time. When I use the backbone controller I do the same thing except I plug the auxiliary splitter to the headphone jack on the backbone controller so I can use my wired headphones and my wired mic both at the same time. I bought the backbone controller specifically because it has a headphone jack. I have 4k movies stored locally on my micro sd card from my phone and I do the same thing that I have already described when watching 4k youtube videos and my 4k movies with the exception of not using the mic and the backbone controller. For example, will any of the smart glasses route the audio from the headphone jack from my phone when I plug in my wired headphones and route the video from my phone when using the usb c port as video out. I wanna be able to use my wired headphones for audio from my phones headphone jack and the smart glasses as an extension for video output from the usb c port from my phone. Unfortunately, none of the smart glasses don't have a resolution of 3840 x 2160p for each eye with a mini led display not oled at 1,000 nits that I'm looking for. The tcl ray neo x2 smart glasses have 1,000 nits and uses a micro led display and uses ar that I'm looking for instead of vr and mr but the tcl smart glasses does not have 3840 x 2160p resolution for each but have 1920x 1080p for each eye. 1080p resolution is too pixelated and not that sharp looking. I been used to using 4k since 2014. My sony xperia 1 iv android phone has a 4k oled 120 hz display, my 2022 razer blade 15 has a 4k 144 hz ips display and my samsung chromebook has a 4k 60 hz super amoled display. Using less than a 4k display is like the equivalent of having a 1080p tv instead of a 4k and have a library of 4k physical discs. I even watch 4k youtube videos even on 1080p displays on any device like a phone, laptop and tablet that has a 1080p display.
Sadly VITURE is a horrible company to deal with - they have no devices to ship, charge your credit card and then do not ship your order. No matter when you ask about your order it is the same answer - next week.
The xreals also have a mobile adapter called the "beam" that also allows charge for the switch, ps5, etc. It even ads 3DoF, which vitrue doesnt offer. This video is verge build a PC bad. Why even include xreal in the video (not even the latest xreal version) if you didn't do the much needed due diligence of reporting?
OMG, stop putting out bad information. The Viture comes WITH 3DoF without needing an external device like Xreal's Beam device. The Viture DOES have a mobile device. It has the neckband which you can wear around your neck and is much more elegant a solution than the Beam.
Moms in the 90's: don't stand too close to the TV, it's bad for you
People in 2023:
Well tvs back then did use actual electron guns to fire electrons at a phosphor screen (and your face). That said, it wasn't really dangerous then because of the electron gun either. It's just not great for your eyes long term, I think mostly due to the even brightness.
Let's be honest though, we are all going to need glasses/contacts/laser correction at some point. The world is far to reliant on screens now. Hopefully someone comes up with a solid bionic eye replacement. I want night vision, thermal vision, and video display all built into my eyeballs. 😂
The XReal designs the lens in a way that makes it appear as if it were a few meters away. That's why people with near sighted vision have to use their contacts or prescription attachment to use them. They're great if you want to avoid myopia.
Haha😂
Nice comparison but it would've been a lot more useful if it was done with the Xreal Air 2.
exactly. He also didn't go into the xreal accessories. weird?
vrgamerdude already did on his Facebook, Air 2 is even worse than Air 1
Tried air 2, no difference. The Air 2 Pro stole the electrochromic film from Viture and sold them like 450 bucks...
It’s just a minor improvement with newer Sony mini OLEDs and slightly better frame. Xreal has to do way more to support the original Air and their half baked Beam that’s incapable of handling its actual use case to be taken seriously. If you own Xreal Air, just skip 2 unless you can sell the old one for near retail price.
@@fruitcake4910 the issue with small size makers like xreal is that they tend to put all R+D on newer devices and forget to support the others.
Rumor is VITURE is going to make their add-ons compatible with XReal and Rokid glasses as well.
This video came out today. The xreal air 2 came out this month. Does it make sense to look at the old model?
These are the budget models. Thr 2s are the premium
@@NateBuildingBricks Yes. Technically the old model being sold for less it's more budget minded.
In terms of Switch playing, Viture is hands down the best! I have spent hundreds of hours on these glasses and there is no latency at all!
The screen size hand gesture you provided was very creative.
Yea it wasn’t very helpful lol
Very useless too.
I have Viture glasses and they are just great! I use it all the time when playing Switch especially games with decent graphics like TOTK since its much better than Switch's 720p screen. The color-changing film is literally black magic...I shocked everyone when I showed it to them.
how text is readable and blur on edges?
@@BlobBlobkins Text is totally readable and no blurry issue for me
@@sekiro18888 interesting, I sold my Xrel Air cus of that. Do you still use them? Maybe I should give Viture a try
What is the impact on your eyes? Will this cause long term damage?
why don't test the air 2 pro?
Thank you! I’m trying to decide between the two.
Good review, but given the price and the electrocromatic issue, can you compare the the xreal2 or the xreal2 pro. The features and price points align more closely.
have no manical difference in version xreal air vs air2 pro bro , only bes feature was the bightness control
Do they support 3d video?
I have about 20+ 3d Blu-Ray.
The xreal does. I have used mine for 3d video a few times
Is the mobile dock what you need to connect a laptop to the Viture glasses?
What do you think of the Viture neck band. So far the only draw back is that it has to be connected to wifi for a lot of it's compatibility, but it really makes a lot of those accessories unnecessary.
Do all the streaming services work through the Viture glasses? IRC the xreal have problems with at least Netflix due to DMCA?
there is zero problems with the xreals, you must be talking about the beam
Hi, I flight a lot. Do you think this would help for some work and tv shows during the flights? Viture?
Can I use the Viture with an iPhone with lightning port?
Are there transitional lenses for these?
I think the last video I saw on cnet they did of the xreal air was after the company changed their name … and cnet was still using the old name for the whole video.
And now they’re using the old product.
Viture glasses are much better
Too bad none of these are available in my country :( I would really like to try these before buying!
You should have compared to xreal air 2 especially price wise
I love my xreal air the only downside for me is i wear prescription glasses for distance so i have to use my contact lenses in order to use my xreals. I wish it had the adjustable focal dials instead of the prescription lens attachment which gone run you $150 or more extra, Seems like the new xreal 2 pro's have same design.
@fgerv my optometrist office tried to charge me like $220 to put my prescription in my xreal insert, say it's a special glass that have to be cut or whatever.
I was able to get prescription lenses from HOSVR, still labelled as Nreal last time I checked. I think it was a sale but they are still pretty fairly priced. The only thing was I had to put the lenses into the frame provided by Xreal, which can be a bit fiddly. I'm both short sighted and have astigmatism so having the inserts was a must for me. I've worn contacts in the past but for some reason I've always had trouble looking at screens with them - though these contacts are daily disposables so I don't know if people with longer-lasting contacts have the same issue.
Xreal sells the prescription lenses for another $45 or something.
@thomasshaver1569 i have the prescription len attachment already, but getting my prescription in them my eye doctor facility trying to charge me an arm n a leg well over $150
@@ag3116 yikes! That sucks man… I’ll be using my contacts anyway so I hope that works out. I use them almost exclusively anyway.
can i use the mobile dock for pc or gernerell hdmi out?
These are the Xreal air pro and Viture Pro. The non-pro versions, which he has in the title, don't have chromitic displays.
For a CNET reviewer, this is a MAJOR oversight.
Thanks for the video
Came for the display glasses, stayed for the Sean Booker
Do they decode 3D blue ray movies from hdmi output of a 3d player?
@fgerv a 3d bluray disk does have standards, the 3d bluray player hdmi output is standard. Do these glasses display the standard 3d output?
@fgerv you are good at answering a question I did not ask. I am only asking about STANDARD 3D BLURAY MOVIES. Content on the internet and iOS are irrelevant.
Does Virture screens follow your head around or can you lock them in place like you can with the Air (w/ Beam)?
Yes they are the only one that has built-in 3Dof
@@AlexJorgensenPresidentso you CAN lock them on viture? My English is not good
@@BlobBlobkins Yes you can, it is ok to use, not as good as when you are using an iPhone with their SpaceWalker app, but for me I seldom use 3Dof
@@AlexJorgensenPresident thanks
120HZ? 60HZ? Resolution? I mean I could look it up on their site but it would have been nice to know :D Alot of time the quality of these displays is so low its better to just not use them.
Great now add an array of cameras like meta smart glasses and you have Augmented Reality.
Want vr glasses ... Had pro 2 were blurry I couldn't read the text in games ,, I returned them. Too bad any other options???
I feel the rokid max should be compared it's the company that started it. And the max is considerably better. Being hdcp compliment . Bigger screen and amazing audio
So which one. Viture or XReal?
I do like you're review BUT I do have a few issues with it. 1st like the viture's mobile dock the xreal does have the xreal beam which you didn't talk about. Also xreal came out with the xreal air2 and xreal air2 pro (and these has the same dimming feature as the viture). This would have been a better comparison
Anyone uses Viture with Steam Deck? I have heard and seen some shaddy images on reddit, but it seems like ventilation on the Deck is blocked with the Viture mobile dock mount...
the viture look slightly less ridiculous on your face
I don't want internal battery, lighter and you can use external.
But the real problem is needs an app for 3dof rotation.
You can likely bend the frames a little bit though.
Does mobile dock it works with TCL NXTWEAR XR GLASS 👓
I can't get with the smaller display of the Virtures. I just got the Legion Glasses and coming from the Xreal 1, it was a big difference. I'm just use to that 201" display, opposed to the 120' display size of the Virtures and Legion Glasses. It makes a huge difference.
which would you recommend for reading text? Can't read text on Air 1 very blurry
You will likely see more applications work for the Viture glasses. Xreal prohibits the developer community from being able to develop software to compliment there platform. Custom software/applications for Xreal require there Nebula software to be installed on your device. And the list of devices that support Nebula is very limited. for PC users if you check there website not even windows is supported for nebula and has been like this before I can remember. If you choose to use these with your phone Nebula mixed with the glasses will drain your battery faster than your wallet at Disney land.
In my opinion, I would recommend getting xreal air 2 pro, then use the virtue accessories like the neckband and dongle attachment. They're compatible
I only really play World Of Warcraft, I wonder if either of these glasses are compatible with playing WoW from a gaming laptop dis DisplayPort compatibility?
thanks for review. I will be holding out for the 2k or 4k versions; someone will be making them, I hope.
Does it have 3D degrees of freedom ?
Viture does built-in. Xreal needs the another device called "Beam".
If they were wireless or atleast didnt need to conect to switch directly but have a dongle on switch and portable battery for the glasses i would get em
How much bad are smart glasses for eyes?
all other reviews I have seen suggest xreal has better colour, clarity and sound. why do you say that viture is better? you need to explain in more detail
my experience was the opposite, the Viture are much better for me. The only thing is the screen is a bit smaller but at least the edges arent a blurry mess
hey, thanks for responding, so have you tried both and decided on vitures?
@@kom17 I've got the Nreal glasses (before they changed the name to XREAL) so it could also be the quality control wasn't that good back then. I recently got the Viture in an auction only because the price was very attractive and got really impressed by the quality, the magnetic cord is really nice and the way it's designed doesn't seem to "pull" as much as the xreal. The quality of the glasses themselves is great and doesn't feel like cheap plastic is going to break at any moment. The dials to adjust in case you have myopia (I wear contact but not all the time) as well as the electrochromic film are very nice touches. Overall a really nice piece of tech. I'm pretty sure if I upgrade my glasses in the future it'll be a new gen of the Viture ones as opposed to a new gen of the XREAL ones
Does anyone know how Billy mays died?
Does give a headache?
I see AR Glasses and Headsets being very efficient and possible revolutionary in certain medical settings...
Imagine being able to do open heart surgery with the patients vitals in your distant line of sight, or even an enhanced close up image of what you're doing.
For consumers... I don't see much except for maybe Navigation via GPS guided directions... or enhanced vision or AI assisted prompts for people with low vision disabilities.
I don't want my FaceBook or messages in my eyes, I want relevant, helpful information for the specific task, when I need it. I want AR to assist me, not distract me or draw me in about the latest news or Amazon Lightning Deal.
Already been used for decades, buddy.
DBZ scouter. Any with built in camera?
Plus X-real echo system is more robust and has some AR features as well and games.
Quite the contrary, viture's ecosystem is much more robust with the neckband, mobile dock and iOS XR support, xreal is not even close
The air 2 pro are incredible compared to the air 1. Air 2's image is more sharp and bright yet somehow the optics being smaller made the image noticibly larger for me on the air 2 pro. Electrochromic is a must after using it. Somehow the 100 percent blocks out all diffused light yet allows light about 2.5 ft away to still come through very dimly but somehow clear. Its completely black yet phone is visible along with peoples movements around me. The convenience of the dimming is emense on planes and i use this every time i fly to either do work or watch a movie which looks damn near 4k with the combined resolution of each eye. Viture is over rated considering its greater brightness is due to the image being much smaller in addition to terrible contrast. Lastly viture is only 60hz refresh rate which is not ideal for competative games like call of duty.
In the air 2s are the edges of the image blurry
@@jessica49arrowyes the air. That’s why I’m returning the xreal air 2. Does the viture have blurry lenses?
If you're going on a trip, in your favorite rocket ship. Flying through the sky, Little Einstein! Thanks for the memory.
What's the cost of each?
Amazing review
A lot of talking, but which one has better display? I have a hard time reading text on Xreal air 1
This is the answer MKBHD is looking for..
The XReal Air 2 Pro has the electrochromic adjustment.
I just bought these during the Amazon Prime day sale and have sent them back. I am shortsighted and these were my first pair of XR glasses. I chose these because of the built in dials to adjust for short sightedness. The problem is, the virtual screens would be sharp but all surrounding "see through" areas would be blurred due to my short sightedness. At no fault of the device, it doesn't work for me as I am unable to see my physical keyboard clearly nor my laptop screen (for extended virtual screen workspace). Having said that, Skywalker app for MacOS is pretty cool, allowing 3 side by side screens in different layouts.
Why not use the Xreal Air 2 pro + Beam?
It's too bad they don't have selective darkening so that only those areas that are lit up by the virtual screen are darkened by some select ratio.
A great technology, and honestly it solves a lot of problems, but it's not quite mature yet.
The Xreal air 2 pros do have that technology. He compared the Viture to an older model Xreal. The new model has the electro chromatic darkening lenses.
@@thomasshaver1569 mm this is only en the cover lens , no in the prismatic or screen, because is a a reflection, are tecnologies distincts
You should have compared to the xreal air 2 and xreal 2 pro.
Which one is better in 2024
Thanks. Xreal has now a Pro model, test it 😅.
Also there is another brand called Rayneo, review it please
Can I still connect my earbuds so that I won't be using the speakers on the glasses? Cause when I'm on an airplane the speaker part is not a good idea.
I'm leaning Viture
The Viture are awsome!!!
For the Viture what adapter do I need to buy to connect my DJI drone? Dji air 2s Mt controller doesn't have a screen on it.
1080p is unacceptable for me for anything with text/code/vector graphics. Quest 3 is a much better deal given the specs/price, but I don't like added weight and that I have no interest in the metaverse. After trying Xreal/Viture/Rokid for quite a while, I'd wait until these offer 4k+ resolution.
You clearly don't understand resolution and ppd enough to talk as confidently as you do.
Pixel density.
Put aside text/code: I agree that the Quest 3 is a better deal, the important caveat being that it has far fewer pixels per degree (PPD), so not well-suited to reading text/code.
yeah i am a programer , this glasses will be a real help , the dioptrias is a very usefull feature , but que resolution is something poor for me, i have a 49" monitor , would be really fantastic get a similar widescreen aspect ratio 32:9 o 16:9 etc
@, agreed. Even just something with the resolution of the GOOVIS G3 MAX (2560x1440, 46 PPD), but with the "glasses" form factor (ability to see desk, comfort) would be great. The Immersed Visor sounds very cool, but I'm worried they're "biting off more than they can chew". Also the 43 PPD is sort of moving in the wrong direction, even 50 PPD isn't great.
That's a HUGE flaw in the marketing if they don't add functionality to get a first person view of what they actually do. I'll call it right now - this product will fail simply because of that lack of foresight.
I fail to see how the iPhone 14 not having a now standard USB-C port, or Nintendo failing to include a functional USB-C port, is at all XReal or Viture's fault. A little like blaming Tesla for not supporting gasoline refueling at their Supercharger stations.
They say these work as productivity devices. A giant monitor for your laptop. You’ve not really done this at all or spoken about working for a couple days with this as your monitor.
I’m going to assume that they don’t have the battery or comfort for this to be an option.
They don't have any battery; they take power from whatever you plug them into
@@Antenox but, they can be tethered to a battery.
@@zero11010 Oh, I see, you were talking about battery life in general when using this. Gotcha. Sorry for the misunderstanding
@@fgerv awesome! I’d love to hear more about what that’s like for you.
I’m a software engineer. I’ve been considering these different kinds of virtual monitor devices and so far they all seem bad.
I have a friend who has been doing VR and AR work for over 2 decades. I have another friend who is the head of VR (also working with AR tech and devices) for Lucasfilm. Both of them have ALL of the hardware available (sitting in boxes in their offices). And after talking to them, both individuals and their coworkers do all their work on real monitors and only put on AR/VR hardware to test specific things. I find this extremely telling.
* What kind of work do you do?
* Do you work with your glasses?
* For how many hours a day do you work with your glasses?
* Do you use this as your primary display device for your work?
* What issues do you run into?
* What would you need for this (or something like it) to be your primary display system to do your work?
If something like this or the Meta pro visor or the Apple VR thing is going to be feasible for productivity instead of just being a toy … I feel like it needs to be a preferred way to work.
@@fgerv I just saw a pretty detailed review of these glasses. They pointed out a lack of sharpness around the edges that makes reading text pretty much impossible. They were also able to demonstrate the lack of sharpness with a camera on the screen in the glasses.
These do not appear to be good enough to work on.
I’m a software engineer. Everything I do is on screen and clarity matters.
It also seem like the “120 inch screen at 3 meters” claim makes it a 24inch screen on a desk. So, a mundane monitor is larger. And, I use two of those.
So, it’s WAY less screen size and the image quality is too poor to read text at the edges.
I feel like I have my answer.
Who does a comparison video, but doesn’t actually compare the products side by side 😂
RUclips 101 bro
1:38 Imagine being anti-consumer by supporting a PROPRIETARY connecter vs USB-C.
👎👎👎🤣🤣🤣
Companies have been trying this for the past 20 years. Still unsuccessfully. Ugly, bulky, too many cables. Same issues. Resolution has improved the rest is just as bad.
how many refresh rate it has? 300mhz.
Viture is 60 and Xreal 2 is 120.
Why the heck wouldn't you mention the Viture app is iOS only?? FFS man. Trying to make an informed decision here.
Google Glass died for social issues. Not technical. Did you solve any of those issues?
PSA: viture ones are small and look better on women or people with smaller heads and the xreal are more tradition ray ban size
Another video like thousands out there. Hey man, can you expand it to something like software development using these glasses? This would be different and would share very important info about the product.
I have the same question. Have you find something?
@@3web3 no, sadly I have not. All the videos on this matter are the same. I reached out some creators (as I did here, but in a more polite manner than this one), some said that would look on it but nothing till now.
@@ThugLifeModafocah....have you had any luck finding a good video for software development. I have no interest in the gaming aspect that everyone seems to review but need these to partially take the place of sitting in a chair at a desk all day. I have been looking a zero gravity workstations but these are unbelievably expensive and was hoping something like this would be a sufficient replacement. I would just like to know if these are being used by anyone strictly for work purposes and how they are when you are looking at text and multiple monitors for hours on end. I also wear glasses to see at distance but don't use them when I am at my desk for work so not sure if I would even need to prescription inserts.
@@sb6450 my needs is exactly like yours, including the zero gravity thing. Sadly, zero info about this. Some video creators answered me saying they would check but then, nothing. I got a response once from another viewer saying that text in these glasses is not so good. So, no lucky so far. I guess that we gonna need to wait apple vision pro to get launched to have something usable (I really believe that it will be awesome to development). It will be expensive, but at least not so expensive as zero gravity chairs.
What in the World!? Holy smokes
Size of thing-I-don't-want-to-say-out-loud: "This size."
I’m happy I already invested hours into watching other reviews. It’s not okay to compare the older generation of a company’s products and not mention that everything you mentioned was addressed and fixed in the new/current model the company sells. This seems like you were paid to promote one product over the other, and I don’t say that lightly because doing that without informing your audience would destroy your credibility. You didn’t share the other company’s adapter that’s similar either though, so this is just very misleading and alarming. Why would you compare a current generation product to a last generation product? Why would you only share one company’s accessories in the same category? Why would you not mention there is a new updated product that addresses your concerns?
They need to come up with a wireless connection will be a major upgrade, and also an internal battery...i mean if your guna make something this high tech why not give it all the best features...?🤔🤔 its kinda pointless if you have to stay that close..might as well just look at the actual screen thats much larger
Internal battery simply means more weight on the glasses which will impact you more on long term period
Not me getting the xreal for $70.00 and the vulture for $50.00 😅
People that wear glasses already:
Hello,îs It possible for xreal air glasses to work with the mobile Dock from viture.Thank You.
Nice review, but the X-Real beam solved most of the problems mentioned, plus it ads more features and a 320 inch screen. The x-real 2 pro has better audio quality, brightness, and includes electro chromic lenses, plus they're lighter and have improved balance and nose cushions. You should do your research. 😅
Do your research as well, 320 inch is pure overmarketing while FOV stays the same...Viture already have better audio quality, brightness, and electro chromic lenses that was copied by xreal
@@sergekonevsky “copied by xreal” come on now… that’s like saying ford copied back up cameras from Chevy… its a feature that as a consumer you would expect products like these to have. Instead of commenting like a negative, applaud xreal for adopting it. And I don’t understand why everyone is even using audio quality as a comparison point. You are so limited by the nature of how the sound is being delivered to begin with… if you want good audio quality that will match the visual experience you’re gonna need nice earbuds or over ears. To me the audio comparison is negligible.
@@thomasshaver1569 Probably because people like you who tolerate this kind of copy, either work or support for this kind of company, so that companies with such low behaviors still exist.
@@sergekonevskyFunny how iPhone users are fine with such practices, when Apple announces "groundbreaking functionality" that has existed in other platforms for years.
All works of art and culture (including technology) are derivative in nature, so "copying features" is a moot argument. I worked at an R&D facility for a major car manufacturer, and we had vendors regularly come and display tech that wasn't seen by consumers for > 5-10y minimum.
My point is that unless a tech is proprietary and built in house (rare), all of these manufacturers have access to the same OEMs, making it a question of cost/profit/integration.
Another example is Monitors/TVs and Memory (RAM). While there are a vast amount of brands designing/selling these products, there are less than 5 major manufacturers of LCD panels and flash memory that all those companies buy from...meaning a $2k TV could be using the same LCD panel as a $200 one.
@@sergekonevsky dude everything you’ve ever bought was a recycled idea… people like you are so near sided and have such a limited mind that it’d be a waste of my time to explain the depth of the meaning of the quote “there is no such thing as a new idea”
Yeah there is x real 2 now
Eh, neither. They're kinda gimmick glasses. The screens are good, but the design is lacking. Image is too small and the frames get in the way, blocking part of the image.
You'll just constantly be reminded and annoyed by the frames unless you're in the dark.
I think these are good glimpses at what the future will be. Also, not that many devices support them.
Imagine how bad that is for your’re eyesight only a inch from your retina
Wow thank god an expert on the biology of the human eye chimed into the discussion, can you explain why this is bad for our eyes? Or are you just imagining?
Or you know you can just get the xreal beam
This feels like a virtue commercial. Man everyone is playing an angle.
Don't buy any AR/Display glasses. Unless you have a small head or you are a child(not an adult child). You need to know the IPD of your eyes and the distance between the screens of the AR/Display glasses before you buy a set. It's funny you watch reviews of AR/display glasses, the reviewers look like they are cross-eyed because the screens are set so close together. These reviewers are clueless to why the screen looks blurry on the outer right and left sides. The outer sides look blurry because there is no IPD/PD setting and the screens are set too close together. All the glasses look like they are made for a kid or an adult with a small head. The quest 2 has three settings IPD 58mm, 63mm, and 68mm. The quest 3 has a IPD setting with a range of 58mm - 71mm. I hope all the AR/Display glasses brands read this!
I wonder if any of the smart glasses like the smart glasses in this video will connect to the backbone controller to my phone while I have my wired headphones connected to the backbone controller for playing games. I also wonder about the same thing about connecting my wired headphones to the headphone jack from my sony xperia 1 iv android phone to get 0 latency audio and plugging in any of the smart glasses to the usb c port from my phone. My sony phone supports video out from the usb c port. On my phone I use a 3.5mm auxiliary splitter for connecting my sennheiser hd 600 open back headphones to the 3.5mm aux splitter and my rode lavalier go mic from it's 3.5mm port to the same aux splitter for 0 latency audio for gaming. I set it up this way so I can use my wired headphones from it's 3.5mm port and my wired mic from it's 3.5mm port both at the same time. When I use the backbone controller I do the same thing except I plug the auxiliary splitter to the headphone jack on the backbone controller so I can use my wired headphones and my wired mic both at the same time. I bought the backbone controller specifically because it has a headphone jack. I have 4k movies stored locally on my micro sd card from my phone and I do the same thing that I have already described when watching 4k youtube videos and my 4k movies with the exception of not using the mic and the backbone controller. For example, will any of the smart glasses route the audio from the headphone jack from my phone when I plug in my wired headphones and route the video from my phone when using the usb c port as video out. I wanna be able to use my wired headphones for audio from my phones headphone jack and the smart glasses as an extension for video output from the usb c port from my phone. Unfortunately, none of the smart glasses don't have a resolution of 3840 x 2160p for each eye with a mini led display not oled at 1,000 nits that I'm looking for. The tcl ray neo x2 smart glasses have 1,000 nits and uses a micro led display and uses ar that I'm looking for instead of vr and mr but the tcl smart glasses does not have 3840 x 2160p resolution for each but have 1920x 1080p for each eye. 1080p resolution is too pixelated and not that sharp looking. I been used to using 4k since 2014. My sony xperia 1 iv android phone has a 4k oled 120 hz display, my 2022 razer blade 15 has a 4k 144 hz ips display and my samsung chromebook has a 4k 60 hz super amoled display. Using less than a 4k display is like the equivalent of having a 1080p tv instead of a 4k and have a library of 4k physical discs. I even watch 4k youtube videos even on 1080p displays on any device like a phone, laptop and tablet that has a 1080p display.
You guys are like 2 years too late.
Xreal Air 2 says hi.
🤣🤣🤣
Sadly VITURE is a horrible company to deal with - they have no devices to ship, charge your credit card and then do not ship your order. No matter when you ask about your order it is the same answer - next week.
The xreals also have a mobile adapter called the "beam" that also allows charge for the switch, ps5, etc. It even ads 3DoF, which vitrue doesnt offer.
This video is verge build a PC bad. Why even include xreal in the video (not even the latest xreal version) if you didn't do the much needed due diligence of reporting?
OMG, stop putting out bad information. The Viture comes WITH 3DoF without needing an external device like Xreal's Beam device. The Viture DOES have a mobile device. It has the neckband which you can wear around your neck and is much more elegant a solution than the Beam.
can people see that your watching something?