The Ultimate Smart Telescope Comparison - Design & Specs

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 июн 2024
  • What is the best smart telescope currently available? Let's find out in this 2-part series! This first video goes over the physical aspects and the specifications of each smart telescope. Part 2 will cover the imaging of each type of target for astrophotography.
    Telescopes compared:
    1) Unistellar EVscope - bit.ly/42yezim
    2) DwarfLab DWARF II - bit.ly/47BEyIi
    3) ZWO Seestar - bit.ly/3pKO8r3
    4) Vaonis Vespera - bit.ly/45NbWu3
    💪🏻 Found this helpful? The best way to support us is through Patreon: / galactic_hunter
    ✨ Become a lifetime member of our Premium Astrophotography Course: www.galactic-hunter.com/galac...
    🎨 Our PixInsight Processing Guide: www.galactic-course.com/colle...
    📚 Learn more with our books: www.galactic-hunter.com/books
    00:00 - Introduction
    01:50 - EVscope Design, Specs & Advantages
    03:50 - Dwarf II Design, Specs & Advantages
    05:55 - Seestar Design, Specs & Advantages
    07:43 - Vespera Design, Specs & Advantages
    09:40 - Conclusion
    Website: www.galactic-hunter.com
    Facebook: / galactichunter
    Instagram: @galactic.hunter
    Starting Astrophotography, a Complete Guide: www.galactic-hunter.com/post/...
    Beginner DSLR Astrophotography Equipment Guide: www.galactic-hunter.com/post/...
    The equipment you see in most of our videos: www.galactic-hunter.com/blog/...
    Disclosure: Some of the links on this channel's videos are affiliate links. This means that, at zero cost to you, we will earn an affiliate commission if you click through the link and finalize a purchase.
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 78

  • @GalacticHunter
    @GalacticHunter  6 месяцев назад +6

    One issue in the video: Focal Length of DWARF II is 100mm, not 675mm.

  • @sgtsol7934
    @sgtsol7934 6 месяцев назад +7

    Entry into this hobby is so out there, I love what you guys do and appreciate your content...I live vicariously through you guys. On my own with basic cheap telescopes been able to view the standards Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, Venus, Orion Nebula but not so well. I wish I could view like you guys do, especially out in Arizona or Palm Springs where it's really dark and can view so many stars. Thanks again guys for sharing your time with us!❤

  • @TheSwiftnick
    @TheSwiftnick 5 месяцев назад +1

    Another great review, thanks guys 😀

  • @DronemanJoeRc
    @DronemanJoeRc 6 месяцев назад +3

    I bought the Vespera based on your recommendations and so far its been fantastic. Im going to watch your test vid of all four and I do hope I made the right choice..Thanks my friends for sharing and Merry Christmas to you.🎄🎄👍👍👍👍👍🎄🎄

  • @X_Excelsior
    @X_Excelsior 6 месяцев назад +3

    This video is very well edited 👍

  • @javier5622
    @javier5622 Месяц назад

    Excelllent video! Congrats and thank you!

  • @deepthought1569
    @deepthought1569 6 месяцев назад +4

    I have the Dwarf and have maybe 10 hours of exposure time on most of the November targets within its range. This thing is amazing in a lot of ways. The price quality n ease of use is superb. I think maybe the best bang maybe the zwo but I love my dwarf

  • @DigiTuben
    @DigiTuben 2 месяца назад

    Thank you and good job on the video! At this time there's no broad comparison reviews out there to reference on these devices, so the effort on this is very much appreciated! Is there maybe a way you could provide a comparison of the devices you reviewed in a format that can be easily referenced, side by side, outside of audio?

  • @StaticGamerYT
    @StaticGamerYT 7 месяцев назад +1

    The only video i needed!

  • @andesastro
    @andesastro 7 месяцев назад +2

    I think the EVScope is great just because it got Stella so excited on minute 2:37 . I think she didnt get that happy even when you guys got your collaborative APOD. Kudos EVScope!

  • @stevenholt824
    @stevenholt824 6 месяцев назад

    So looking forward to pt2. Traveling from UK to Oz in Feb and need something to do some imaging while I'm there . Do I take my 385mm apo n camera and buy a mount out there or just get a smart scope ?

  • @SpaceIsBeautiful
    @SpaceIsBeautiful 6 месяцев назад

    This is an excellent way to start astrophotography if you’re just starting to get into it! These telescopes make things so much easier and once you have gotten a feel for astrophotography and enjoy it, you can always buy bigger telescopes and astrophotography gear once you’re ready to get into more advanced astrophotography!

  • @jrags35
    @jrags35 7 месяцев назад

    This is a awesomely good idea,,

  • @nathantw
    @nathantw 7 месяцев назад +6

    I feel a little silly spending thousands on numerous individual astrophotography products when I could just buy one item for a fraction of the price. Plus they’re so much easier to use.

    • @deepthought1569
      @deepthought1569 6 месяцев назад +2

      Don't say that, I just bought a c11 yesterday 😂

    • @AstroB.R.
      @AstroB.R. 6 месяцев назад

      Sound like an adv...

  • @edwarddebruyn8717
    @edwarddebruyn8717 7 месяцев назад +3

    Very curious for part two, IQ...most important I think. Will the resolution be important, quality of the optical system, focal length....
    Very nice to put them side by side

  • @aw7425
    @aw7425 6 месяцев назад

    It’s gonna be out of this world…thank you and clear skies

  • @BsamohT228
    @BsamohT228 7 месяцев назад +5

    I think there is a mistake in the DwarkLab specs; 675mm@F4.2 is an aperture of 160mm (That's the spec of a giant sports lens !!). Even 48mm@F2.4 means a 20mm aperture, which this clearly isn't. So I think DwarfLab took some "marketing freedom" and used full frame equivalent focal length instead of using proper physical values.
    Looking at the IMX415 specs, it has roughly a 6.7 times crop factor, so the real focal lenght is probably around 100mm (which makes a lot more sense in that small packaging).

    • @GalacticHunter
      @GalacticHunter  7 месяцев назад +1

      I think you're right, the specs on the website shows as "100mm (48mm wide, 675mm telephoto)" so I was a bit confused by that, I should have just used 100mm

  • @madshelmerpetersen4428
    @madshelmerpetersen4428 6 месяцев назад

    👏 will the B3 be comparable with Beosound Theater and before more one ?

  • @div0007
    @div0007 5 месяцев назад

    What do you guys think of Vespera 2? The specs look impressive on paper. Should i pull the trigger on it or wait for Pro?

  • @keeplookingup911
    @keeplookingup911 6 месяцев назад +1

    Astro-BackYard covered SeeStar too. Planetary imagining is totally useless with this scope as planets appear like dots.

  • @scottweaverphotovideo
    @scottweaverphotovideo 6 месяцев назад

    Where did you shoot this video? Thanks!

  • @joeycraswell54321
    @joeycraswell54321 7 месяцев назад +5

    All things considered the Seestar can’t be beat! Especially since the app is always improving!

    • @hmuphilly9129
      @hmuphilly9129 7 месяцев назад

      the delivery times though...

    • @RetiredFE
      @RetiredFE 7 месяцев назад

      @@hmuphilly9129 I got mine from Agena in 6 days.

    • @mycarolinaskies
      @mycarolinaskies 7 месяцев назад

      @@hmuphilly9129 quickly becoming a non-issue. As of Dec 1st the timeframe for delivery is ~week thru most vendors.

    • @GamingCentral3000
      @GamingCentral3000 6 месяцев назад

      @@hmuphilly9129I ordered my S50 from highpoint scientific on Nov 18 and got it on Dec 3, 2023. Not too bad.

  • @genemetz1945
    @genemetz1945 3 месяца назад

    So which one would actually track a SpaceX falcon 9 or the Starship durring launch?

  • @JethroXP
    @JethroXP 7 месяцев назад

    I'm curious if the output of any of them is even remotely comparable to a bespoke setup. The SeeStar seems to have glass specs similar to a RedCat51, but are the images as clean as a RedCat?

    • @paths1111
      @paths1111 7 месяцев назад +1

      Not for long exposure deep sky imaging - all of them have uncooled sensors and are alt-az mounts without field derotation, thus limiting the practical length of exposures. These scopes are all intended primarily for EAA-type imaging, with relatively short exposures and somewhat limited total integration time. Their main attraction is of course simplicity of setup, no polar alignment, guiding, etc. but you do trade off capability for that benefit.

  • @luboinchina3013
    @luboinchina3013 6 месяцев назад +1

    Dwarf can be mounted in EQ mode!

  • @nelsongonzalez6898
    @nelsongonzalez6898 6 месяцев назад

    Where is Part 2? cannot find it

  • @sigaar109
    @sigaar109 6 месяцев назад

    Anticipation of “a few days” is killing me! Almost worse than heving to wait until christmas morning….(would love to understand why all of these have such low megapixel numbers. My cell phone 20 years ago had a better sensor…interesting to lesrn about Vespere Pro…)

  • @light1531
    @light1531 6 месяцев назад

    Unistellar a fairer comparison is Equinox 2, lower price point. More around 2000 USDs. Equinox a faster optical setup and naturally less prone to dew formation, being reflector, which you didn’t mention. Software on Unistellar aimed at producing an image on the night and not directly via post processing. The Dew remover on Vespera is around 106 pounds plus postage and is needed in Europe. Dwarf2 is 8mp, but 2x2 binning means more like 2mp. You can use ICE (free Microsoft software) to stitch Equinox images.

  • @SpaceRocksandStardust
    @SpaceRocksandStardust 7 месяцев назад +2

    Have to take Dwarf. Definitely the most portable by far, can do a rough eq mode, expanding your usable image field, great interface, top notch customer care and an interactive development team. Frequent updates to the app. Seestar is the only other one in the same price range.

  • @simulatedpilot3441
    @simulatedpilot3441 6 месяцев назад +1

    Seestar does Mosaic now I believe.

  • @nikaxstrophotography
    @nikaxstrophotography 6 месяцев назад

    couldnt care less for any of these scopes actually I just love watching your videos no matter the content

  • @mikehardy8247
    @mikehardy8247 7 месяцев назад

    Received my Seastar today. Supposed to be cloudy all week.

    • @allenbaylus3378
      @allenbaylus3378 7 месяцев назад +2

      I finally went and put my big 600MM lens on my mount - needed to find the old spare vixen plate for that.
      Every night since then we have had windows of 1-3 hours of clear nights - firtst starting at 8PM local but then shifting later and later, so we had no clear nights that I could image.
      Curse of this hobby. Or the werewolf curse - where you get your equipment and the first night you can test is under a bright full moon.

    • @mikehardy8247
      @mikehardy8247 6 месяцев назад

      WEREWOLF curse! Can I borrow that?

    • @allenbaylus3378
      @allenbaylus3378 6 месяцев назад

      @@mikehardy8247 be my guest - only because it is true!
      Remember 20 years ago getting a new eyepeice - the day it arrived was a full moon and then clouds for the next few weeks.

  • @MichaelB123
    @MichaelB123 6 месяцев назад

    Where is part 2 of this series??

  • @hyperdorian1662
    @hyperdorian1662 Месяц назад

    Are any of these scopes capable of decent planetary imaging yet?

  • @hmuphilly9129
    @hmuphilly9129 7 месяцев назад

    Thought Ill never get one of these....
    Fast forward: used up my trial rental for Unistellar, have my second dwarf (but may need to be returned, inner dust etc in lens.) And now have a Seestar arriving early December [I hope.]
    Yeah wtf happened to my initial thought 🤣😂

  • @denodan
    @denodan 6 месяцев назад

    Think the Seestar will end up matching the l
    Performance of the vespera, as vertically the same specs, and software needs to mature, as Vespera has had a head start.
    The Dwarf 2 is the only one that you can EQ Mount, so I get no field rotation, so may make use of the wide field camera as a guide scope in a future update if using it as an eq mounted system, plus longer exposure times available. So has a greater potential than the others in this resoect

    • @adventurerofthethirdplanet
      @adventurerofthethirdplanet 6 месяцев назад

      The Seestar is virtually already obsolete. In a few months, Vespera Pro will be released with a 12,5 mp sensor and images up to 32 mp with live panorama mode.

    • @bobmusil1458
      @bobmusil1458 6 месяцев назад

      @@adventurerofthethirdplanet I like the resolution of the Vespera Pro but it’s 4x as expensive as the Seestar.

    • @adventurerofthethirdplanet
      @adventurerofthethirdplanet 6 месяцев назад

      the images you can get with it have 16 x the resolution of the ones of the Seestar + more sensible sensor + better optics. It s just not the same category, like it goes for car, camera, computers ...@@bobmusil1458

    • @dennisrogers6786
      @dennisrogers6786 6 месяцев назад +1

      We are not talking about the vespera pro? The standard one, and the Seestar software is not as mature yet, but when it is, will match the standard Vespera for a fraction of the price. Cannot even compare the Vespera pro as that's a whole new system abd even more expensive. At the price you Pau, may as well invest in a decent setup with an EQ mount. It does nor matter how good the Vespera pro is. The alt alz mount handicaps any system and limits exposures to around 10 ro 15 secs max due to field rotation.
      If it could be EQ mounted would then be a game changer? Why is the D2 the only one that can be EQ mounted?
      Surly would not be hard to allow these to be eq mounted? All you need is a tilting tripod?
      Seems Dwarflabs have it figured out and owners eq mount the D2.
      This leads to the possibility of Dwarf labs giving us far longer exposures if they add an EQ mode

  • @allenbaylus3378
    @allenbaylus3378 7 месяцев назад +1

    Based on the specs - I selected these as the winners - not that the others will be bad - just think that DwardLab seems to have a slight advantage on the amount of light that hits the sensor.
    The results should be intresting.
    Unistellar DwarfLab ZWO Vaonis
    EVScope Dwarf II Seestar Vespera
    IMX 347 IMX 415 IMX 462 IMX 462
    f4 f2.4 f4.2 f4.9 f4.9
    450mm 48mm 675mm 250mm 200mm
    7.7 MP 2 MP 8MP 2MP 2MP 8MP
    Planet Planet
    Sun
    Moon
    Orion

    • @MarkManner
      @MarkManner 7 месяцев назад +2

      The Dwarf has the smallest aperture, 24mm, so the least light gathered of the 4.

    • @denodan
      @denodan 6 месяцев назад

      But the Dwarf 2 out of the lot has the most potential, as it can be EQ mounted, so opening it up to give the sensor longer exposure ability and use the wide field camera as maybe a possible guide scope. But yes the aperture handicaps it compared to others

    • @DouglasLippert
      @DouglasLippert 6 месяцев назад

      @@denodanat 25mm vs 50mm it would need twice the exposure time..

    • @DouglasLippert
      @DouglasLippert 6 месяцев назад

      @@dennisrogers6786 It has a 25mm objective. You can’t bypass physics. It will take twice the time due to 1/2 light capture.

  • @alandyer910
    @alandyer910 6 месяцев назад

    Great testing! Thank you! But a tough one to do as the software for these scopes is changing rapidly. So whatever function one model lacks is likely to be added with the next update. We’re anxiously awaiting the major upgrade for the Dwarf II scope which corrects its major deficiency, its small object catalog. And the SeeStar is supposed to get a Pro mode with a choice of exposure times. The Dwarf has one significant advantage over the other three in that it can be polar aligned to minimize field rotation in long sets of images. It wasn’t initially designed to work that way but users tried it, and it works. Dwarf had to strengthen the base to allow it to be tipped over but it is an officially supported (literally!) mode now. Clear skies!

  • @kushanvyas7728
    @kushanvyas7728 4 месяца назад

    Zwo seestar best overall fit in budget.

  • @Videomakerrobin
    @Videomakerrobin 5 месяцев назад

    Reflectorrrrrr

  • @josephtang5459
    @josephtang5459 6 месяцев назад

    You are comparing with a very early version of eVscope. Why?

  • @spookymulder8462
    @spookymulder8462 27 дней назад

  • @thoughts_are_free
    @thoughts_are_free 5 месяцев назад

    the problem with all of those is the Image size... you can not print this stuff... also zoom in is not good... the performance and software is everywhere great but under 12 MP is just a gimmick for PC screen... waiting for the next round with more pixel...

  • @henryhuyhoang
    @henryhuyhoang 6 месяцев назад

    where is part 2 ?

  • @Katzenrads
    @Katzenrads 7 месяцев назад +3

    My bet is Vaonis is the winner for image quality and long term investment. From price perspective and for beginners getting into astro, I think its a tie between Zwo seestar and Dwarf. Its disappointing that Zwo seestar has smaller FOV so large targets like Andromeda are cut (although it does use the same sensor IMX 462 as vaonis and has an extensive catalog). For me Dwarf has an edge because of the dual camera, adjustable gain, eq setup and horizontal orientation. I'll wait for Vaonis Vespera pro 😅.

    • @mycarolinaskies
      @mycarolinaskies 7 месяцев назад

      For the price, you could buy 3 Seestar and do wider field or multiple targets. Once again the only advantage Vaonis is really offering is auto-setup, everything else is simple software variances which will change as Seestar matures.

    • @denodan
      @denodan 6 месяцев назад

      Vespara the only reason it will win is only down to software as its been around longer so has matured. Give it 12 months and Seestar will be as good or better than the Vespera, and often seeing new improved features with Seestar. Also mosaic mode is coming to Seestar and even when it came out it has a better app than when Vespera first came out

    • @Katzenrads
      @Katzenrads 6 месяцев назад

      @@mycarolinaskies not interested in buying more than 1 gadget at this point as I have a dwarf. I Will wait and see how seestar matures though.

    • @timm7778
      @timm7778 6 месяцев назад

      Vespara's software is terrible, buggy, lockups, etc

    • @DouglasLippert
      @DouglasLippert 6 месяцев назад

      Seestar FOV is not that narrow. You can image the entire Andromeda Galaxy.

  • @allenbaylus3378
    @allenbaylus3378 7 месяцев назад

    first!

  • @bobmusil1458
    @bobmusil1458 6 месяцев назад

    Your information about focal length is wrong!
    You compare *actual focal length* (Unistellar 450 mm, Seestar 250mm, Vespera 200mm) to *equivalent focal length* of 675 mm for the Dwarf.
    The actual focal length of the Dwarf is 100 mm.

    • @GalacticHunter
      @GalacticHunter  6 месяцев назад

      Yes, we acknowledged that in a different comment

  • @viniguez487
    @viniguez487 6 месяцев назад

    All I heard from Dalia is...BUTT-TON 🤣

  • @paulovinicius5001
    @paulovinicius5001 6 месяцев назад

    Stop interrupting him!

  • @berndhepp9121
    @berndhepp9121 7 месяцев назад

    How can you buy such crap?😂