A320 engine fire procedure

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • Today we're in a full flight Airbus A320 simulator and we're going to see how I perform in an A320 when stuff goes wrong.
    We will have an engine fire after take off and are going to get close to crashing as we get surprised by some terrain.
    I had a blast flying in this awesome simulator even though we had to do an engine fire procedure.
    Hey everyone, today we're testing a Full flight Simulator and got some failures in there. As always sit back and enjoy!
    If you liked it leave a like, Comment and Subscribe.
    Be sure to check out Fullflightsim.de !!! Really enjoyed the time in the Simulator.
    www.fullflight...
    Instagram // / fullflightsim.de
    Be sure to check out my pages:
    Instagram // / pascalklr
    TikTok // / pascalklr
    Adams Links:
    RUclips // ‪@adamdnn‬
    Instagram // / adamdnn
    ****
    In this Video no official Checklists or Procedures were used! The video was filmed for the sole purpose of fun and should not be seen as training material! This Video contains Advertisement.
    ****

Комментарии • 22

  • @stacevox
    @stacevox 2 года назад +1

    New favourite account.

  • @eddideredel
    @eddideredel 2 года назад +2

    Amazing editing!

  • @mohammadjavadazadi5979
    @mohammadjavadazadi5979 10 месяцев назад +2

    why didn't you transfer the radio? what procedure is that? Are you playing a game there?

    • @eprn1n2
      @eprn1n2 10 месяцев назад +3

      Easy there Mohammad!

  • @tonydavis1305
    @tonydavis1305 11 месяцев назад +1

    Totally incorrect engine fire procedure.
    Once you are above 400' ECAM action is to be completed. Here you are busy turning left and resetting altitude which is DANGEROUS.
    Please be a true professional.

    • @fadhilfzan
      @fadhilfzan 10 месяцев назад

      Yes i think so. Above 400’ pilot should do ECAM antiinflamasi first untill eng secure, then accelerate to green dot and climb up. After that pilots can assest the situation and decide to countinue or RTB.

    • @eprn1n2
      @eprn1n2 10 месяцев назад +1

      You are totally incorrect. 400' is the minimum altitude. Company procedures can have you do it later. PIC can make a decision to do it later. Calm down please.

    • @christophegert7271
      @christophegert7271 8 месяцев назад +1

      Especially at an airport like Salzburg where you are surrounded by terrain. It is probably the safest course of action to fly a Engine Out SID and start the procedure 10 sec later. It is not gonna help anybody if you have secured the engine but flown into the alps.

    • @BerHard-zi7yn
      @BerHard-zi7yn 14 дней назад

      Yes good Idea you do the ECAM at 400ft and fly straight into the mountain...

  • @sneekysmurf2084
    @sneekysmurf2084 2 года назад +1

    im not a pilot by any means but you turned off engine 1 while in a left hand turn is that not rather dangerous?

    • @FlyingSi
      @FlyingSi 2 года назад +3

      It’s absolutely fine

    • @runnygames9027
      @runnygames9027 2 года назад +3

      on a smaller twin this is dangerous but this jet is fly by wire and is extremely stable in a 1 engine situation

    • @sneekysmurf2084
      @sneekysmurf2084 2 года назад +1

      @@runnygames9027 i see! thanks for the reply

  • @Valentin_MeL
    @Valentin_MeL Год назад

    Stoping at the runway. other planes: ye whatever we can wait...
    i would personally stop at the taxiway, others also need to land.

    • @dgonL
      @dgonL Год назад +4

      You can't because the fire trucks are on the taxiways waiting to enter the runway. The fire was also still going, so putting it out is the priority, vacating the runway would only delay that.

    • @Valentin_MeL
      @Valentin_MeL Год назад

      @@dgonL And if it's only runway and some on there would have fuel emergency without another airport close by, then what?
      2 possible crashes at the same day?Pretty stupid story for the news today, don't you think so?

    • @dgonL
      @dgonL Год назад +4

      ​@@Valentin_MeL That's why aircraft are required to have an alternate airport and carry enough fuel to go there.

    • @Valentin_MeL
      @Valentin_MeL Год назад

      @@dgonL Are sure? Maybe if we speaking about airliners that's true, but if if we speaking about VFR cessnas, this could be a different story.
      Oh ye, you should check wikipedia and the stories when airline planes crashed with a reason "out of fuel", there is planty of them.
      Their stories doesn't really suit for your "carry enough fuel"
      Driving away from the runway can only take a few seconds after landing. Doesn't look like a big problem for me, espessialy when runway have plenty of taxiways amoung it's length, and with this you can save someone's life.

    • @dgonL
      @dgonL Год назад

      ​@@Valentin_MeL VFR traffic has different but similar rules regarding the amount of fuel they have to carry. Did you actually look at the airline crashes due to fuel exhaustion? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Airliner_accidents_and_incidents_caused_by_fuel_exhaustion
      If you did you would know that this is extremely rare and in fact hasn't happened in 7 years. I couldn't find a single case, not one, where the crash was due to the runway being blocked. As I said before the aircraft has to stop on the runway because there are fire trucks blocking the exits of the runway. Taking the time to vacate the runway would simply not allow the fire trucks to get to the burning engines. The runway is also much wider than the taxiways, allowing the fire services more room to get to the engines. Stopping on the runway in this case is not a choise the pilot even has to make. Every company manual and aviation authority will tell you to do that and this will make the firefighter's job easier.

  • @johnrauner2515
    @johnrauner2515 2 года назад +3

    Stopped watching 1:35. Pretty clear this is going to be endless and pointless distracting and unnecessary cuts. Yet another youtube amateur deciding it's a good idea to film something with as many cameras as possible.