8:32 that is the international symbol for a Biohazard, not radiation. chambers like that are used to interact with or otherwise manipulate biohazardous material samples while preventing direct contact/exposure to a person; a smart inclusion to this variant's onboard facilities.
The glovebox looks impossible to use with the brackets on the front. How would you actually insert you hands as portrayed - it looks like it wouldn't open without some time with a wrench.
@@jasonp.1195 It looks to me like the brackets on the front are manually turned locks. It makes sense to have what amounts to an airlock there, so you can pull your hands out and slam the doors if something goes wrong.
When the wings are horizontal it should be better for atmospheric flight with all the lift they’d generate, they need to add an option to have the wings horizontal with the engines and landing gear staying in flight position.
@@Smullet90 "The "wings" aren't wings, they're flat on top, they would produce no lift." Never talk about stuff if you have no clue about the subject. "flat" wings as you call them, can absolutely produce lift. google "angle of attack"
@@clausejoke1985 that is called drag. Lift comes from laminar flow over an airfoil. If you don't know what you're talking about, maybe don't comment...
@@Beet5090 Alright lift can not be produced by flat surfaces :), not true but whatever. www.quora.com/How-does-an-aircraft-with-flat-wings-get-lift-even-in-the-absence-of-aerofoils Read this very well written answer, I do not have the time to teach the basics of aerodynamics. Now do your homework before you talk to someone who knows what he is talking about. You basically have fallen for the "incorrect lift theory" that is still teached by clueless teachers around the world. As a pilot I can laugh at your superficial knowledge and the fact that you have the balls to talk back to me while having 0 clue what you are talking about. www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/wrong3.html bye
Yep, after enjoying too much of the bacon flavored plants you discovered on small plant in a backwater of the galaxy you named Swine. No doubt about it, if you can grow this stuff in an Endeavor, you are gonna make BANK! Never mind the rather frequent and highly explosive flatulent emissions, (see video where there is evidence his crewmember blew himself up by using an antique e-cig he found, while on the LOO. (told him that thing was bad for his health........ Probably have to put a warning label on the package.... hmmm...
Too bad, they missed their chance to have the long design mean something from as an astrophysics perspective by having sensors on both wing tips, creating a long baseline array with higher resolution images, a virtual telescope the width of the whole ship! Instead they put "nothing" on the other end?? Such a wasted opportunity.
Once you ship gets damaged to a point it looses power mid-flight, you are trapped. Will be pretty bad for the repair functionality once that is in. Also the interior is another point regards CIG not following any straight lines regarding future gameplay mechanics. Not a single other ship has those research utilities. The new 315p doesn't even have a research console as far as I can tell. I really would wish they'd plan more ahead what tools/stations/features a future career/activity might use and then develop props for that to put into ships. If they don't do that, ships will either need another rework down the line to cramp the utilities in or activities will get simplified to evade that rework.
Just because they dont have them right now doesn't mean the mechanics and game play wont come at a later point. They are talking about Viruses in game as in Biological, They are talking about a science version of the endeavor so the game play does sound like it is planned......
pretty sure the pannels near the camera ball on the wing are some sort of radar/radio frequncy scanning gear, not solar panels, since solar panels that small on a ship would be like a sceen door on a submarine
@@KillerOs13 good point, if it has high power cameras, especially infrared, they would need heavy cooling, having it on a separate system would make sense too since the main coolers have to endure sudden load spikes from weapons, thrusters, and so on
@@UNSCPILOT While I at first thought you were overthinking this, I rethought this and maybe you're right. I am leaning towards phased array antennas for the sensor suite. Just line now you can adjust the parameters of the sensor ping, I would assume you would use these in a fly by of an item, since they don't seem to have the same structure on both sides. And in vertical flight mode they point DOWN.
Out of interest how did that go (If it went at all)? I'm just curious as to if the "landing" and "flight" mode transitions were at all possible in Space engineers
They need to make this ship function more like the b wing from Star Wars where the vertical position is the attack position and the flat position is the cruise position.
You missed the coolest part of the reliants. Sit in the copilot chair and access the remote camera feed from the scanner. The Reliant is the only starter ship to provide multi crew gameplay. You can actually install 2 remote turrets with 2 size 2 guns on any of the variants. The copilot can control both simultaneously providing complete coverage firing at any angle. I picked up a Tana because I think these ships are so good. I just hope they can take more of a beating than when the kore was first released.
Dude, EXCELLENT job finding a great lighting environment to show the ship clearly. Hangars have buggy lighting and, for whatever reason, ships spaw in hangar with damage effects. I saw one guy do a review in the shadow of an asteroid. I couldn't see anything. Also, unhooking landing gear operation from wing configuration is on their list of things to do (also affects swing wing and other types). Explosive bolts to blow the cockpit glass away from the ship in lieu of an ejection system isn't a stretch to imagine or implement.
i love this game so much all these ship trailers are awesome, Im definately going to be a smuggler when its fully released gonn a use that to fund my ships :P
Does anyone else think the 2 weapons hardpoints on the "bottom" of the wing should be placed above and below the cockpit along the central axis, so in flight mode they're firing along the "sides" of the cockpit, between the 2 pilots?
In space, you could go into flight mode and turn 90° and fly sideways relative to how you started. Not sure how long a Reliant can sustain that in atmo however
Those are not solar panels i think, as most likely those are space radar or jamming. The other wing section has what looks like a radar dome of some sort because its evenly rounded with symbol on it.
By the looks of them I'd say those are radiator panels rather than solar panels. I could be wrong. But you should have a look at current day space hardware and the ISS in particular. It has a LOT of panels, but actually a major fraction of them are radiator panels, not solar panels. And solar panels tend to have a bluish black hue, while radiator panels tend towards reddish brown. (if you're wondering why a spaceship needs radiator panels, and why so many of them, turns out that a basic law of physics is such than in a vacuum, one of your single biggest concerns is getting rid of waste heat - this problem is so large in fact, that it's one of the principal reasons why 'stealth is space' is actually kinda nonsensical. That, and the power output of even something like the space shuttle is so high that if it's main engines are firing you could see that from earth with current day tech if it was happening in the orbit of pluto... - long story short, waste heat is a big deal in space.)
Question: Do you buy every new ship that releases or do you borrow it from someone or do you upgrade from your previous ship? Cause, some of these vessels are damn expensive.
I own a SEN and I realllyy like it. It is kinda pointless in the PU right now because no exp/science gameplay obviously, but I'm in love of what the concept of the ship is. Also I really like the two modes, I do hope once VTOL improvements come in it means I can fly in "horizontal" position too, without landing gear extended.
@8:16 That's a glovebox: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glovebox As the link shows it's a fairly standard piece of equipment in many different type of science laboratories, including on the International Space Station.
Any plan to re-cover the base freelancer? When you last made a video on it over 3 years ago it was just in the hanger and not all the doors worked. It would be nice to see fly and the guns demonstrated. Just a thought.
I don't think those are solar panels on the end of the wing. I think they're sensor arrays, like hyper-sensitive sonar or radar. The large antenna surface area would make it far more receptive.
I'm pleased that you report the handling as good, I melted my Kore as I felt it handled like a pug in the old flight model in atmosphere. Maybe I'll be buying it back. ;)
Maybe the solar panels will allow you to scan with the engine/power off. That way you could be a lot more stealthy and still scan? I think this would give it a great selling point.
Somebody Nicked your Loo!!!! Gonna have to lock my ship, cant have us holding it for days at a time, Mine is great, sat on it last night in game. I am sure they are not solar panels, more like sensor receptors, probably EMF or some such. I believe the right seat will run the scanners, and such, the back seat is oriented more for science, so analyzing samples etc. Maybe unlocking some excellent new bits in the game by doing so. Find a new food group, a planet with BACON flavored plants!! Love the idea of going out and poking around the system with this. I would assume a really good set of optics slaved to other sensors in the gimbaled turret ball. CANT wait to really start using the Sen to its full potential.Thanks for the video, Keep em up!
What exactly is going to be the purpose of science/exploration ships? I bought a 315p, but I have to wonder what I'll use it for. CiG hasnt really clarified the details as far as I know
I don't know how the Sen is, but the Tana is currently suffering from absolutely awful heat problems, even when afterburners aren't used. It really becomes nearly unusable after a short while in combat scenarios, even when you completely avoid using afterburners and stay out of cruise speeds. It's a constant barrage of warnings that engines/weapons/shields are all overheating. I've flown many of the other light and medium fighters, and all of the other ones only overheat when pushed- Reliant overheats under basic use. Lovely ship otherwise.
Those are Not solar panel..they are probably;y some sort of Scanner/IR/ER sensor like a radio telescope. And the Warning sticker is For Biohazard not "Radiation"..Oh Tactical I still love you.
I would rather they get rid of the vertical flight mode... since they are not... they can give us the option to toggle vertical and horizontal modes...
The new FM will allow this - but the gear will be down. However since the new FM doesn't have "Precision Mode" the gear out is only cosmetic, you can still fly the same as gear up.
flight mode changes was supose to come in 3.5 but as far as i did see so did it just dissapear they did even say in one of the rtv's that it was supose to be able to do it in 3.5
Most useless "feature" ever invented. It's not just completely nonsensical and useless it's actively counterproductive. This ship shouldn't rotate at all.
I know its obviously not a problem in game, but imagine its a rainy day and you get into a reliant with a buddy, he sits above you in flight mode and theres just dirty water dripping off his boots onto your head.
Im not trying to be mean so please take this as constructive feedback. In your reviews, you are very detailed, a bit too detailed in my mind. If you could speed up the review a tiny bit it would be nice. Overall great review
Discord discord.gg/xdAb8GH
I'll finish this video later but your one of my favorite RUclipsrs thanks for the video
Love these show case videos, tyvm.
5:10 Reliant Kore; R 46 68 600 MU 6 25 S 1500
The toilet isn't missing, you just poop straight onto the ground and fly away. MISC, always a step ahead!
8:32 that is the international symbol for a Biohazard, not radiation. chambers like that are used to interact with or otherwise manipulate biohazardous material samples while preventing direct contact/exposure to a person; a smart inclusion to this variant's onboard facilities.
The glovebox looks impossible to use with the brackets on the front. How would you actually insert you hands as portrayed - it looks like it wouldn't open without some time with a wrench.
@@jasonp.1195 it could be unlocked via an as yet unimplemented control.
@@jasonp.1195 It looks to me like the brackets on the front are manually turned locks. It makes sense to have what amounts to an airlock there, so you can pull your hands out and slam the doors if something goes wrong.
When the wings are horizontal it should be better for atmospheric flight with all the lift they’d generate, they need to add an option to have the wings horizontal with the engines and landing gear staying in flight position.
The "wings" aren't wings, they're flat on top, they would produce no lift.
@@Smullet90
"The "wings" aren't wings, they're flat on top, they would produce no lift."
Never talk about stuff if you have no clue about the subject.
"flat" wings as you call them, can absolutely produce lift.
google "angle of attack"
@@clausejoke1985
Maybe you should Google "flow turning" and tell me how you can turn flow on a flat plane?
@@clausejoke1985 that is called drag. Lift comes from laminar flow over an airfoil. If you don't know what you're talking about, maybe don't comment...
@@Beet5090
Alright lift can not be produced by flat surfaces :), not true but whatever.
www.quora.com/How-does-an-aircraft-with-flat-wings-get-lift-even-in-the-absence-of-aerofoils
Read this very well written answer, I do not have the time to teach the basics of aerodynamics.
Now do your homework before you talk to someone who knows what he is talking about.
You basically have fallen for the "incorrect lift theory" that is still teached by clueless teachers around the world.
As a pilot I can laugh at your superficial knowledge and the fact that you have the balls to talk back to me while having 0 clue what you are talking about.
www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/wrong3.html
bye
Sometimes the toilet gets so destroyed by a crew member that you just have to space the entire thing.
Yep, after enjoying too much of the bacon flavored plants you discovered on small plant in a backwater of the galaxy you named Swine. No doubt about it, if you can grow this stuff in an Endeavor, you are gonna make BANK! Never mind the rather frequent and highly explosive flatulent emissions, (see video where there is evidence his crewmember blew himself up by using an antique e-cig he found, while on the LOO. (told him that thing was bad for his health........ Probably have to put a warning label on the package.... hmmm...
Too bad, they missed their chance to have the long design mean something from as an astrophysics perspective by having sensors on both wing tips, creating a long baseline array with higher resolution images, a virtual telescope the width of the whole ship! Instead they put "nothing" on the other end?? Such a wasted opportunity.
This was probably written by Albert Einstein
They could redesign
That is an Awesome idea! I want them to do that
I'm a big fan of the MISC ships, eagerly awaiting my hull C
Hahaha...the moment you realised the toilet section was gone. Had me in stitches! xD
Great vids as always, couldn't help but notice that the Kore had it's gear up in landing mode, very hopeful for this!
Once you ship gets damaged to a point it looses power mid-flight, you are trapped. Will be pretty bad for the repair functionality once that is in.
Also the interior is another point regards CIG not following any straight lines regarding future gameplay mechanics. Not a single other ship has those research utilities. The new 315p doesn't even have a research console as far as I can tell. I really would wish they'd plan more ahead what tools/stations/features a future career/activity might use and then develop props for that to put into ships. If they don't do that, ships will either need another rework down the line to cramp the utilities in or activities will get simplified to evade that rework.
Just because they dont have them right now doesn't mean the mechanics and game play wont come at a later point. They are talking about Viruses in game as in Biological, They are talking about a science version of the endeavor so the game play does sound like it is planned......
Your point is valid but the Sen is a research vessel while the 315p is a pathfinder ship. Different specialties within the exploration umbrella.
the toilet is one time use only -- jettisoned into space after a heavy dump..
You really sound like that guy from Little Britain, David Walliams
pretty sure the pannels near the camera ball on the wing are some sort of radar/radio frequncy scanning gear, not solar panels, since solar panels that small on a ship would be like a sceen door on a submarine
I was thinking that or radiators for the sensitive electronics of scanning gear.
@@KillerOs13 good point, if it has high power cameras, especially infrared, they would need heavy cooling, having it on a separate system would make sense too since the main coolers have to endure sudden load spikes from weapons, thrusters, and so on
@@UNSCPILOT While I at first thought you were overthinking this, I rethought this and maybe you're right. I am leaning towards phased array antennas for the sensor suite. Just line now you can adjust the parameters of the sensor ping, I would assume you would use these in a fly by of an item, since they don't seem to have the same structure on both sides. And in vertical flight mode they point DOWN.
Just a reminder, "glass" in Star Citizen is actually Diamond laminate
Oh my god, not laminate! My 890J has only the rarest of milled Diamond for all of its transparent surfaces!!!! Laminate if for.... the masses
>Proceeds to try and build in Space engineers.
Don't mind me, I don't even own Star Citizen.
I shall own that ship though.
Out of interest how did that go (If it went at all)?
I'm just curious as to if the "landing" and "flight" mode transitions were at all possible in Space engineers
They need to make this ship function more like the b wing from Star Wars where the vertical position is the attack position and the flat position is the cruise position.
It does now, based on pilot preference, which is nice. And configuration impacts flight characteristics in atmosphere.
You missed the coolest part of the reliants. Sit in the copilot chair and access the remote camera feed from the scanner. The Reliant is the only starter ship to provide multi crew gameplay. You can actually install 2 remote turrets with 2 size 2 guns on any of the variants. The copilot can control both simultaneously providing complete coverage firing at any angle. I picked up a Tana because I think these ships are so good. I just hope they can take more of a beating than when the kore was first released.
Dude, EXCELLENT job finding a great lighting environment to show the ship clearly.
Hangars have buggy lighting and, for whatever reason, ships spaw in hangar with damage effects.
I saw one guy do a review in the shadow of an asteroid. I couldn't see anything.
Also, unhooking landing gear operation from wing configuration is on their list of things to do (also affects swing wing and other types).
Explosive bolts to blow the cockpit glass away from the ship in lieu of an ejection system isn't a stretch to imagine or implement.
i love this game so much all these ship trailers are awesome, Im definately going to be a smuggler when its fully released gonn a use that to fund my ships :P
Well that little advertisement at the beginning is probably one of the best I’ve seen (other than the one for the Kraken).
Does anyone else think the 2 weapons hardpoints on the "bottom" of the wing should be placed above and below the cockpit along the central axis, so in flight mode they're firing along the "sides" of the cockpit, between the 2 pilots?
I agree, or perhaps have two on the opposite side of the wing. ;)
All it needs is an “escape” option kinda like eject in fighters where you punch out that “middle” bit of the cockpit and jump out.
Ladeeez and Gennymenn, tactical advancehere
That's how i know a worthwhile review is coming up.
In space, you could go into flight mode and turn 90° and fly sideways relative to how you started. Not sure how long a Reliant can sustain that in atmo however
Those are not solar panels i think, as most likely those are space radar or jamming. The other wing section has what looks like a radar dome of some sort because its evenly rounded with symbol on it.
I was thinking radiators, what with their proximity to the engine exhausts.
@@RizzsChannel good point. Unnecessary heat from reactor or engines can be annoying to get rid of in space at times.
By the looks of them I'd say those are radiator panels rather than solar panels.
I could be wrong.
But you should have a look at current day space hardware and the ISS in particular.
It has a LOT of panels, but actually a major fraction of them are radiator panels, not solar panels.
And solar panels tend to have a bluish black hue, while radiator panels tend towards reddish brown.
(if you're wondering why a spaceship needs radiator panels, and why so many of them, turns out that a basic law of physics is such than in a vacuum, one of your single biggest concerns is getting rid of waste heat - this problem is so large in fact, that it's one of the principal reasons why 'stealth is space' is actually kinda nonsensical. That, and the power output of even something like the space shuttle is so high that if it's main engines are firing you could see that from earth with current day tech if it was happening in the orbit of pluto... - long story short, waste heat is a big deal in space.)
Question: Do you buy every new ship that releases or do you borrow it from someone or do you upgrade from your previous ship? Cause, some of these vessels are damn expensive.
I own a SEN and I realllyy like it. It is kinda pointless in the PU right now because no exp/science gameplay obviously, but I'm in love of what the concept of the ship is. Also I really like the two modes, I do hope once VTOL improvements come in it means I can fly in "horizontal" position too, without landing gear extended.
Glass is not used for any ship cockpit, it's actually a transparent metal
2:15 It's obviously transparent aluminum.
@8:16 That's a glovebox: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glovebox As the link shows it's a fairly standard piece of equipment in many different type of science laboratories, including on the International Space Station.
that sens got one hell of a strong vacuum flush XD
Any plan to re-cover the base freelancer? When you last made a video on it over 3 years ago it was just in the hanger and not all the doors worked. It would be nice to see fly and the guns demonstrated. Just a thought.
He might want to wait a little longer, at least until the remote turrets are actually remote turrets and not glorified gimbals. :p
That's a good point. Can you explain the difference between those things. I don't know a lot about guns.
I don't think those are solar panels on the end of the wing. I think they're sensor arrays, like hyper-sensitive sonar or radar. The large antenna surface area would make it far more receptive.
Those aren’t solar panels lol. That’s most likely an antenna “dish”. Or for taking measurements.
Believe those are going to be scanning antennas of some type, not solar panels
9:43 Looks like MISC is subcontracting their toilets from Drake now :D
those "solar panels" look more like radiators to me. would also explain why they are where they are on the ship
Might be. Going to be a pain if you have to aim the looks like they don't move
Note to self, do not pack chili until the crapper gets fixed.
I'm pleased that you report the handling as good, I melted my Kore as I felt it handled like a pug in the old flight model in atmosphere. Maybe I'll be buying it back. ;)
I feel like those solar panels are ranged sensors or radar of some sort, considering the array of sensors in their vicinity
Maybe the solar panels will allow you to scan with the engine/power off. That way you could be a lot more stealthy and still scan? I think this would give it a great selling point.
I don't think they are solar, I think it might be some sort of scanning system, solar pannels are ussually more blue
Next step: pick up carbonated Solo.
Somebody Nicked your Loo!!!! Gonna have to lock my ship, cant have us holding it for days at a time, Mine is great, sat on it last night in game. I am sure they are not solar panels, more like sensor receptors, probably EMF or some such. I believe the right seat will run the scanners, and such, the back seat is oriented more for science, so analyzing samples etc. Maybe unlocking some excellent new bits in the game by doing so. Find a new food group, a planet with BACON flavored plants!! Love the idea of going out and poking around the system with this. I would assume a really good set of optics slaved to other sensors in the gimbaled turret ball. CANT wait to really start using the Sen to its full potential.Thanks for the video, Keep em up!
Thanks Kat.
Being able to change flight mode and keep landing gear up is suppose to be a 3.6 thing I believe
When is this due out? I don't see it in the pledge shop.
Beautiful looking ship
That's not the radiation symbol, it's biohazard. This is one mean alien-researching ship!
"In 3.5 you are gonna be feeling inertia a lot more"
11:03 ho ffs
Maybe the window is transparent aluminum? We can already make it today.
What exactly is going to be the purpose of science/exploration ships? I bought a 315p, but I have to wonder what I'll use it for. CiG hasnt really clarified the details as far as I know
reminds me of the ships from the space combat scene in the 90s lost in space movie
Reminds me of the B-wing from Star Wars.
looks pretty cool
I don't know how the Sen is, but the Tana is currently suffering from absolutely awful heat problems, even when afterburners aren't used. It really becomes nearly unusable after a short while in combat scenarios, even when you completely avoid using afterburners and stay out of cruise speeds. It's a constant barrage of warnings that engines/weapons/shields are all overheating. I've flown many of the other light and medium fighters, and all of the other ones only overheat when pushed- Reliant overheats under basic use. Lovely ship otherwise.
the solar panel like things may be sample collection gel
Nice review buddy , to bad ptu(which you are on for this review) is little lag-buggy
At 3:00 those are a heat conduits not solar panels
I think the panels aren't solar panels. They could be this kind of gel used to collect particles? I honestly don't know
upgraded to the cutlass black lol
if you fly in landing mode the engines overheat really quickly so not recommended
Those are Not solar panel..they are probably;y some sort of Scanner/IR/ER sensor like a radio telescope. And the Warning sticker is For Biohazard not "Radiation"..Oh Tactical I still love you.
Those look more like Radiators for the camera equipmnet :-D
I would rather they get rid of the vertical flight mode... since they are not... they can give us the option to toggle vertical and horizontal modes...
Or go with my option allow the legs to go up.
...yeah you cna do that now.
The new FM will allow this - but the gear will be down. However since the new FM doesn't have "Precision Mode" the gear out is only cosmetic, you can still fly the same as gear up.
That would literally ruin the ship if they removed what makes it unique so I’m glad your not designing ships they would all be boring.
flight mode changes was supose to come in 3.5 but as far as i did see so did it just dissapear they did even say in one of the rtv's that it was supose to be able to do it in 3.5
The new flight mode is in 3.5
B-wing is that you?
I wish the radiators were s-foils
you need to have a lucky crash to be in need of something to destroy the glass afterwards :P
Cheers for vid, KO REY
this ship should have the wings able to rotate separately from the cockpit area.
Most useless "feature" ever invented. It's not just completely nonsensical and useless it's actively counterproductive. This ship shouldn't rotate at all.
when is the Tana or Core coming out
You can do that with glass today XD
beach towels hell ya lets go to the beach and discover new life in the ocean !!
The front window could be made of aluminum. Alon it is called.
And wen wil the reliant variant loos what day wer made to do like the Starfarer ability to gader and refine q-fuel
Edison Trent was that English you just typed in ?
Waiting for them to re-rework it. I cant close the darn doors!!!
Well I guess a long drop dunny doesn't take as much to clean.
I know its obviously not a problem in game, but imagine its a rainy day and you get into a reliant with a buddy, he sits above you in flight mode and theres just dirty water dripping off his boots onto your head.
I was really hoping it was a cool attack craft like the fighters from lost in space :p
Templarzealot89 that would be the Reliant “Tana”.
The Reliant Sen is my favourite ship in the entire game.
It's also the smallest in my fleet of 16.
hi TA
12:20 how the hell is the ship floating like that
Maybe in Zero g it will be easier to get out of the seat
Everyone knows it's not glass it's transparent aluminium 2:01
The lady at the start of the trailer pronounced Mako wrong.
it's air brakes - not solar panels :-)
*Slaps glass dome* Two Seater, you and your mate. Ill let it go for 500 if your paying cash.
I never liked the Reliance, it seemed so unnecessary long and slow, but the rework is done very well!
But..where's the rundown ships. I want a class-code 03-K64, and be a Browncoat ;)
1) he didn't do the wing transition from first person view, disappointing
2) what happens when the top guy farts?
He inhales and wafts in his scent since he is inside an insulated space suit.
@@almostontimehero5415 thank you
Have you watched the scifi horror movie... Life ?
how do you review a ship that is missing its core gameplay mechanics?
The MetaBaron give it a few years :p
I think it's fun to look at the assets and hear TA's take on them, that's just me though.
@Solve Everything I agree completely, but calling it a "review" is misleading
@@TheEyesOfNye Of course, but calling it a "review" is misleading.
3:05. those aren't solar panels lol.
Maybe add some music in the background ;)
Umm how much $$ would this ship be ??
robertsspaceindustries.com/pledge/ships/reliant/Reliant-Sen
Misc has no ejection seats 😨
Neither does Drake but they both make very good ships
The MISC Freelancer has, while not an ejection seat, ejection beds/pods. Although I would like if the Reliants seats could work as ejection seats
I have the same logo sting...... damit........ i know where you got it... I paid for the audio as well.
So they literally are spending all their time building new ships to sell. What the fuck is going on?
press K to close doors
lol hammer-break glass tool to funny.
Im not trying to be mean so please take this as constructive feedback. In your reviews, you are very detailed, a bit too detailed in my mind. If you could speed up the review a tiny bit it would be nice. Overall great review
I actually like his pacing a lot, I find it super relaxing.
Doesn’t bother me how he likes to do it.
I used to like his pacing, but I have a full schedule and not a lot of time to chill
👏ship👏review!