Can Amber Heard Be Charged With Perjury For Lying in Court? (Sidebar Podcast EP. 32)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 июн 2022
- Jesse Weber breaks down one of the biggest questions in the aftermath of the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard trial: Can Amber Heard be prosecuted for perjury? Jesse sits down with criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Marie Pereira as they go through different portions of Heard's testimony.
Listen to Law&Crime's Sidebar Podcast on Apple & Spotify:
Apple: apple.co/3wMgRgB
Spotify: spoti.fi/3wITe7b
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam
#JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard #LawAndCrime 
Развлечения
If she's not charged with perjury with those obvious lies and contradictions, the court system is still a joke.
It's only perjury if a man does it.
Unfortunately they are not going to do anything about her perjury. It’s very hard for people to get in trouble for perjury because they consider that not a big deal and they have so many other larger issues to deal with. I really wish they would do this with her because she really needs to be stopped. If they would bring her up on perjury charges she would have to let go of all this crap that she’s putting out there. She wouldn’t Have the money to pay all the legal fees from the perjury and from an appeal both.
@@judyjarrett3917 it would set a great example of respecting the court system.
It's still a joke
No sense making people take an oath to tell the truth, if there are no consequences if they LIE.
She said under oath she took pictures in different lighting, when it was proven she used identical pics, & just altered them through apps. That’s definitely perjury!
@LindaF. Whitney lied on the stand. Whitney said Johnny came up the stair’s behind her and Amber said Johnny came from behind her & her sister was in front of Amber back turned to steps. They both lied.
I went into this case with an open mind because I remember several years ago watching that video of her tape recording him in the kitchen and I thought what a psycho Johnny was and then I heard about all the lying crap in the courts and I thought OK she sounds like she’s the psycho and I came out of this 100% for Johnny Depp I never believed anything Amber said she looked like she was making it up as she went along and she was performing. I’m sure there was some truth to some things maybe he did like push her off of him or something when she was going at him he probably did throw wine bottles I would’ve went completely insane staying with someone like her. I was in a bad marriage with my ex-husband he was acting violent and I left. when you’re in it it makes you feel crazy
Ummm…she couldn’t see the metadata. You know, the day after the metadata battle, Amber used that as her excuse 🤣🤣🤣🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥
This!!! It was clear BEYOND doubt that those pictures were the same, even without the metadata.
And falsifying evidence!
The perjury comes in with Heard contradicting her own testimony on at least two occasions. In each case both can't be true; therefore, she lied.
Great point
@@boatsandhoes311 🌻
Those are the instances I was thinking of re perjury.
Plus...there is videoproof😜
Find her guilty of cringe.
Yes! When she made claims to deceive the jury then when pressed during cross said another that is the definition of perjury
Although perjury is hard to prove, this is one of the rare instances where there are “mountains” of evidence she was lying. Not to mention falsifying evidence.
She should absolutely be tried for perjury based on the fundamental definition of perjury.
Yes! There ARE many lies that can clearly be proven in many ways, like her saying she never met or seen Morgan Knight, and said that he was NOT the owner, NOT present - many people where there that seen her interact with him, he gave her & Johnny a half hour tour.
Please- don’t even dare to say that she told the truth but didn’t have evidence on her side. She had the opportunity to speak up to any medical professional at any point or time. And she always had people around her as support.
Even then herself and her team keep on saying that they had a mountain of evidence, but infact that evidence clearly backfired and those dumbasses find it so hard to believe that they've lost the frickin case!
Srsly when the world was against Depp, Amber was at her high during which she could've used the medical evidence (if she had any) to completely destroy his life.
But no she's gonna torture him till his grave just to prove herself right
Including medical staff.
@@joaoveloso4954 c'mon why do you even expect her to be so smart🙄✋
Omg. So frustrating. No. Amber is not a victim she's the perpetrator. There is so much evidence out there but the media refuses to do even a small amount of work to look into her claims. Amber's claims are all other people's stories that she played off as her own. She also claimed she barely ever did drugs but she has been an addict using for many many years.
Media: She's a woman + celebrity so she must be right and the others are gaslighted and manipulated by unofficial media. Her dog steps on a bee, isn't that bad enough?
Exactly! 😡
Yeah. She suffered from severe substance issues, too, Johnny just had enough integrity to not treat addiction as a moral issue rather than a medical/behavioral disorder.
@@daricvn I stood on a bee, does that count as well?
It's like we're the only ones who watched the trial 🤦♀️.
I’ve watched the whole trial. If there is no perjury prosecution for Amber for her clearly lying under oath, then the court rules are a joke 🥵🥵🥶🥶
Exactly
I know...the court is always a joke when they don't make decisions you agree with. Maybe it's just you, that's the joke?
@@bernlin2000 No, I'm pretty sure you are the joke here Chris Ducat. Dragging me in that hole with you, unfortunatly. The point being made is that an oath of truth is pointless without repercussion. The courts will be penalised if they are known to be leanient with somthing like this, so it is up to them if they are ok with lying under oath. In turn, telling people it is ok to break that oath. So how about instead of being a sassy little twait to people you actually try to understand somthing other than your own ego.
@@bernlin2000 Uncalled for Chris Ducat. The world, we all watched hours of this trial in its entirety. To lie repeadily on the stand and no consequences? If it was someone you cared about and this happend to them, one would think your attitude would have a better choice of words than "a Joke". No joke when someone tries to destroy your life intentially.
What is even the point of having to make an oath on the stand. If the rules are not enforced when someone clearly breaks that Oath. It baffles me
AH lied on the stand, multiple times. If there are no consequences for her committing perjury, that is a huge setback for the sanctity of honesty in testimony. I can't believe that it "isn't worth it" to hold her accountable.
It shouldn't be JD's responsibility to go after her for perjury. It should be the court's.
I agree 👍
I agree 100%
Absolutely. Get AH, and her two main enablers, Rocky & Witney in front of a jury & see which one cracks first! The lies were nothing short of criminal!
Exactly
Well said I agree
Perjury wouldn't just be that she lied about what Johnny did to her, it could just be lying about anything. She contradicted herself in court so many times. Just that would be perjury because she said one thing at one point during the trial and then said the opposite at another point, which means she lied with one or the other. That is perjury/lying just on its face.
Fun fact: contradicting yourself under oath regarding the same matter is an extra category of perjury under Virginia state law.
@C Mulvenna by death
She submitted numerous 'manipulated' photos.
@@laurieann5312 and probably documents as well
@@charlescollymore7575Documents might be harder to prove.
This case should have ended but after the coverage by mass media and her own statements.. this criminal needs to be tried for perjury for domestic victims everywhere
I feel like the best examples of perjury are her saying she didn't write the op-ed about Johnny Depp, and then later saying "That's why I had to write the op-ed" in reference to Johnny's power and the people around him protecting him; the issue with TMZ; the "I donated" when she didn't; and the doctored photos.
And that’s a lot. Especially when you take an oath TO TELL THE TRUTH!
How about blatantly lying about donating to sick and dying children!!
@@jibbyjabs That would be harder to prove, as pledge and donate is the same word to her, as she said it herself, to her they are synonyms. For perjury, you have to prove that she knew she was lying when she did lie.
@@rosebine9811 she's not clinically insane so she knew she was lying. It's called trying to cover your back. It doesn't matter what she says she deems synonymous. If I say murder and cook for are synonymous to me, can I invite someone over to cook for them and then murder them instead and expect a jury to believe its not murder because to me they're mean the same? No. If your argument is she's too insane she needs to undergo an assessmsnt and she had enough experts to say she isn't insane already. She is just committing perjury. Chronic manipulators know they're lying they just don't care.
@@jibbyjabs Oh I agree, and we both know she lied and covers it using that excuse. Now, lack of culture does not mean insane...I still believe it would be hard to prove. Let,s just hope she goes to jail for committing perjury!
It's just physically impossible to have the injuries she claimed she sustained and not go to a doctor. This isn't a Marvel or DC movie. She's so detached from reality and so are her followers.
No way, she's Kal-Ella. This is her Ultimate Form.
Atlantians have super fast healing powers dontcha know?
It blew my mind when, near the end of the trial, Amber stated that she did write the op-ed in reference to Depp. But near the beginning of the trial, and serving as a core aspect of their defense against the defamation claims, she stated that the article wasn’t even about him, so it couldn’t be defamation. So one of those statements was inherently perjury.
She also admitted after being grilled by Camille that she wrote the op-ed about JD because he was a powerful man and she wanted people to know of his power. She admitted it. She leaked and doctored the TMZ video.
can I press charges against Amber for perjury? I feel offended she lied in our courts and thus want her to be prosecuted
In my opinion, she's a phoney! In my opinion, Johnny's team proved she lied! She should be held accountable.
these are some of the things that on my opinion could lead her to be successfully charged for perjury
first, when her team presented the same picture depicting two different incidents which happened months apart
when she said the op-ed wasn't about johnny but on the last day that she was on the witness stand, she accidentally admitted that it was about him.
when she said she donated the money and then it turns out she didn't and she tried to cover it up by saying donating and pledging go synonymously
when she said johnny wanted to push her sister down the stairs but her sister went on stand and said johnny came from behind ( downstairs ) and kicked her on her back ( not push her)
when she said johnny grabed her arm so tight that it left a big bruise and started punching her on face so many times that she lost count but she presented a photo depicting the same incident but it showed no sign of damage on the face at all and the bruise on her arm did not match the explanation of it
there're so many, i would want to go on
What about her saying during testimony that she had nothing to do with TMZ knowing she'd be at the courthouse? Or nothing to do with the cabinet video?
In her own deposition, she said that TMZ had been alerted. Is that not a clear cut case of perjury???
And TMZ, AIRED that Amber leaked the video..opphsa..
She never acknowledged any contact with TMZ, nor could TMZ provide evidence of their source's identity, it was received anonymously.
@@bernlin2000 In all seriousness, please explain to me then, what she meant in her deposition, when she said "I wanted Johnny to be made aware of the divorce filing, or my intention to file, in person. Not on the internet or through TMZ, which was ALERTED." That's what she said.
Are we to assume that telling TMZ about filing for divorce is completely separate from the rest? She left out where and when they could find her to see the bruise on her face?
I'm not looking to start an argument with you, just trying to understand what you mean.
To me, hearing that along with the ex TMZ employee's testimony, sure sounds like she made the press aware of everything. At the very least she knew and or approved a person in her camp leaking information.
Are you saying those are two separate instances of potentially involving a news source?
Cheers
I'm just on one now...how about multiple photos she presented as evidence that were clearly doubled through a photo shop app and then presented as separate pictures?
How about her being dragged naked through broken glass, slicing and cutting her feet and body, being kicked and hit repeatedly...then to be seen on the red carpet in a backless dress the NEXT night. Yet she testified that for some reason she never worried about what her back might look like until AFTER the event. 🤔
Amber was very careful in her word choices. Watch her testimony again. She kept saying "I didn't do that." "I wouldn't know how to do that." What she didn't say was whether an agent of hers (an attorney, publicist, etc.) took actions on her behalf. She knew how to avoid perjuring herself, and she probably pulled it off successfully.
Didn't Amber also say that she didn't do cocaine but then, later on, when Camille was cross-examining her, Amber corrected Camille about how to snort cocaine and she admitted to have done cocaine..?
Wouldn't that, and other various instances of Amber contradicting herself during the trial, be enough to prove that she was lying under oath?
She had a bump in court🤣
I think it funny she called Depp a coke head when she is the coke head.
I'm not the one who cries easily, and I'm not controlled by my emotions. But I can assure you, if I went through what Amber describes here I would cry hard, even if I had to tell it in public. All she does is breathing heavily, without a single tear. She is lying.
Not to mention her trying to figure her run of narrative. She stops and stammers every time she has to wonder what , and how , to say next.
Whereas her usual run of 'dribble' is on point , concise, and exact.
And i think a lot of her stammering and wondering where to go next , is because she has tried to cry at all the appropriate times , but she just can't .
So that's when she realises that she has to keep 'waffling' horrific details to cover a very real INability to cry.
Not O N E tear in a SIX week court trial , is very , very telling.
The thing i most took away from this case is , you can lie every day , under oath , and there will be ZERO consequences for it.
That is almost as frightening as the psychopath herself.
Yep
All she does is twist her face up. If I were crying in a court room, they'd have to get a mop and a bucket. Crying is involuntary, and nothing about her 'crying' was involuntary, it was all fake. Lousy actress.
I don't agree with judging people on how they act. There's a reason body language experts aren't allowed to testify in court. Everyone is different. People can act strange when they're stressed or reliving things, and judging people for that as being truthful or not is unfair.
I mean. She was lying. Lets be real here there's way too much counter evidence that shows she was, but I still don't like judging how people act on the stand.
@@meggers1771 I do agree with you, but I think the issue was because Amber was 'trying' to cry. So it came off as bad acting. She would twist her face up in odd ways, sigh heavily, and make the motions of crying, but there were no tears, and it seems no real emotion because she would stop on a dime and go with another state of emotion. It was rough to watch.
Omg, she should go to prison, she has lied right throughout the trial..
She never looked at lawyers once during questioning, she looked at the jury only, which I find is rude... Disgusting to not look at person asking you a question..
That tactic backfired on AH. It was noticable that AH failed to look at the jury after they found her unbelievable ruling against her.... Because the jury had not filled out the forms completely & judge PA had not reviewed them prior, AH had time to control her reaction and slap on a stone facade while they were sent back to complete their task. If AH had been the victim AH would have had a completely different reaction. I'm still bummed out that we were robbed of that moment of true reaction.
I am a big fan of the judge but in my view she made a serious misstep by not making the financial judgement & punitive damages cap clearer to the jury.
Her Team told her to. Bc the Jury is who you try to convince.
🛏💩💦💦AQUATURD
Not prison lol, she needs mental help, this bish has gone crazy
Prison sentences start in criminal cases. If its a civil case and perjury has taken place either its ignored or she loses the compensatory charges owed to her by Johnny.
@@tedmink7568 Thanks for that explanation. Why the theater making anyone swear an oath if the court ignores, in this case, the plethora of lies?
But there are instances where she clearly lied. Like when she said she never edited pictures and the difference is that she opened the light for the second picture. They were clearly the same picture, taken at the exact same times (hour, minute, second). Or when she said that she did donate the $7M to charity. Both those things were lies that have been proven to be lies.
Also using the same picture for two different incidents
Yes how can it not be perjury her saying she donated $7million when it was proven she hadnt.
@@angelicaca those wine puddle photos were awesome! She used the same puddle for 2 separate incidents!
If she can get away with these lies, the justice system can close it's doors and let everybody just do whatever they want.
and when she lied about not having anything to do with TMZ leaking the divorce news/ didn't know how it happened when she herself slipped up and admitted that TMZ was "alerted." How did she know they were alerted BEFORE she even figured out how to tell johnny the news through a "third party" source? If she hadn't reached johnny yet, how tf did TMZ even get a chance to get ahold of the drama? She kept dancing around the line until she accidentally slipped out the truth, when she easily could've just NOT mentioned TMZ at all
She should be charge with Perjury please, Her lies is too much.
In the incident where she claims Johnny hit her in the face with a phone, she points to her left side but produced pictures of bruising on the right side of her face. How can anyone believe her. 16:40
the only way to stop this woman is to repeatedly take her to court on perjury, defamation...whatever it takes to stop her....
If her was doing that she's a fighter so why would she just stand there and take it BS liar
The only way to stop her is to get her medical treatment, her mental state is obviously unwell, she’s a pathological liar and narcissist, she needs treatment and I don’t say this be because I care about her, i’m more concerned for her little girl who will have to live with her.
*YES* because what's the entire point of "remember, you're under OATH" if nothing happens to you?
If she’s not charged with perjury, then we basically all learned that we can totally fabricate anything and get away with it…
Exactly: So why even testifying under oath! It's a farce.
Exactly
Whitney's friend accused her of lying to protect her sister. Why can't Whitney be charged?
Alright guys, we're free to lie in court now. Perjury is a myth.
Sorry not for you. If you lie in court you will be fined or jailed. Only AH gets away with it cause she is special. Didn't you know that?.
The most clear and easiest to prove examples of her perjury aren’t her DV/SV claims, but her testimony about the verifiably doctored picture and the -donation- “pledging” of her settlement money. If she’s brought up on charges, those are the ones that need to be prosecuted.
I hope the divorce lawyer/judge that did their divorce enforces the condition that she was ordered to pay the $7 million divorce settlement to the charities and she didn't.
She was never “ ordered” to pay the charities.
She wasn't offered to. She pledged to. Unfortunately I don't think that constitutes a contractual obligation.
It was her choice to say she will donate the sum. Then she didn't. But she's not obligated to.
She committed perjury at least 100 times. 😂
If you're going to set an example of doing the right thing. This. This, the most high profile court case in a long time, is a perfect way to set that example, that perjury will not be tolerated!
She said under testimony she didnt give the videoclip to TMZ, but that must be very easy to prove she did? One of many lies where perjury would be possible imo
Eh, they’d have a really hard time getting TMZ to testify that she gave/sold them the video. There are lots of laws that protect news outlets from revealing their sources. Even though we all know that they had to have gotten it from her ( after all, how else could they have gotten it? ), without them actually saying that, there’s no “ proof”.
She also initially said the op-ed wasn't about Johnny, then revealed that it was. So she did lie under oath.
@@Shadywolf09 I was thinking the same thing.
If she doesn’t get charged, there will be more and more like her doing the same thing.
She got her stories confused. "He balled up his fist, leaned back then head-butted me square in the nose". If someone balled up their fist, they would punch you not head but you.
There's plenty of evidence that she committed perjury. The message that is being sent by not prosecuting perjury is that it's okay to lie on the stand.
Agreed. Even her claiming that everyone else lied on the stand.
This ones trucky in my own eyes. We all know mr depp is awkward and we love that about him. Is it possible to fake out a person by wheeling back to expect a punch when you fully intend to headbutt from the beginning.
Im not defending her in any scamber alertturd format, just offering a recourse this specific arguement can offer.
My question is about knowingly falsifying evidence.
@@hexlinger I feel she realized she needed to get in the story of the head butt and changed course mid-story. If it really happened as she initially described it, I feel she would have said he balled up his fist then head-butted me. I was caught off guard because I expected a punch to the face.
As much as she should be in jail, it’s very hard to charge and convict someone of perjury in a civil court in a manner that would result in jail time
It literally says that in the video.
she can actually be sued again for a statement she wrote, and unlike the OP-ED, in these statements she actually mentioned him
How can anyone trust the testimony in civil cases then? That oath is worthless with consequences for breaking it. I understand that inaction may be the precedent but perhaps that needs to change.
Agree. I’m sure Depp’s team could have called her out on many of the lies she told in more detail but they went for the bigger kill instead of taking up more and more of the courts time otherwise this trial would still be ongoing and there is a time constraint with these civil cases ..they were looking at the bigger picture
There is perjury then there is assault she clearly assaulted him
Her own words
Just for the sake of upholding our laws, which all the rest of us have to observe, she should be tried for perjury or at least held in contempt. If they do not prosecute on the basis of the numerous contradictions then at least there should be several other defamation and slander cases against her for the number of people she said lied on the stand.
She is so vicious through and through, it's just appalling to look at her smirks and grimacing, to watch that pathetic performance, to listen to her panting and telling lies... ugh, so glad it's over. Hopefully.
Me too, I don't think they can appeal though.
yep, that's the "dupers delight' all over that smug smile.
It's just embarrassing that the legal system could even feign perjury would be hard to prove (in this case). We can all see it's easy to prove.
That's the crazy part
I DON"T see how Johnny is liable for Waldman's actions.
Guilty by association basically. It’s absolutely ridiculous. If Depp can be liable for Waldman’s actions I think Depp could go after Amber/Elaine (Amber’s lawyer) for the crap she is spewing on talk shows right now. Except for the fact that he is done with all of this
Was he actually working for or representing Johnny at the time?
@@debcollins8231 I don't remember; good question.
Perjury
Amber in 2020: I donated 7 million dollars.
Bank records: No you didnt.
She is such a liar! If she had proof that she couldn't show in this case- then make her show it in a defamation/purgery case!
This lady is something else the evidence proved him innocent and proved that she lied time and time again
Lady?? She's no lady.
She’s a joke,she never prepped a case review for this interview. Such an insult , disappointing, waste of time and complete ninny, spewing misinformation. She’s looks like a fool
She came. She lost. She left. She broke.
She’ll not go away
I can't bear to watch one more minute of Heard's disgusting, ridiculous, testimony.
Not only that it's clear from her testimonys especially the last one, she has indicated plenty of times looking through social media and watching videos relating to this case which she was strictly forbidden to by the judge. I'm confused why nothing is happening to her regarding this, as well as the perjury. They're gonna make the justice system look a joke if they dont do anything, I mean it's very clear what shes done.
BINGO! 🎯
Only the jury was forbidden from reading social media. Heard and Depp were forbidden from posting, not viewing it.
She wasn’t forbidden looking through from social media. Only the JURY was.
@@wowyathink5982 That doesn't make sense; if she and JD were allowed to peruse social media during trial it could have a major influencing bias on BOTH sides. If you are able, please send a link or share whatever additional insight you may have on this particular point. It would be most helpful. ;0)
@@WH2012 Sure. I’ll see if I can find a link. But I’m not understanding what you’re getting at. How would social media influence them ( AH and JD) any more than they already are? Plus, why/how would it matter if they are influenced by social media since they’re only the plaintiff and defendant. They’re not making any decisions. Plus, they’re clearly already biased towards their own side. How is seeing something on social media going to influence either side any more? The only people that the court doesn’t want influenced by outside factors like social media is the jury.
Are you referring to the the fact that one of them ( JD or AH) may mention something they’ve seen on social media while on the stand giving testimony? I see where that could possibly be an issue. Depends what they say I suppose and the opposing lawyer can always object and have it sticker from the record. Granted, it’s a little late at that point since they jury would’ve already heard the statement but they would be informed that they are to disregard it.
She said she didn't know how to send information to news agencies etc.. she also said under oath if I wanted to do something to johnny I would do it something like that, Vasquez asked her to elaborate
I can't listen to nor watch this woman lie like she does, as it's extremely damaging to true victims. Appreciate the perjury part though.
When she said he had butted me with his head in the nose and I looked him right in the eye than the bottle up the Ying Yang this is something that’s not normally going to happen to somebody only in a movie she went overboard on that when she started lying on the stand that’s when I knew she was lying for 100% she should be tried for Perjury she did commit that back she is nothing short of a habitual liar
To quote the verdict of Mr Depp's defamation suit.
Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes.
It won't happen though, it's civil.
She left out that AH claimed JD trashed the trailer, the manager was upset. The actual manager testified she was lying and only a light fixture was broken.
True but then it is the case of who of the two is lying? Both cannot be true but maybe the manager is lying. I’m just playing devils advocate.
You reap what you sow Amber, suck it up. The jury was unanimous, let that sink in
This channel blew up during the Depp trial. Great job. You provided high-quality coverage, so you deserve the subscribers.
If your spouse decided to do a cavity search on you for their drugs, then either you've hidden them there before or you've made them think you would hide them there. Nobody thinks like that unless they're given reasons to believe it could be true.
That's what I was sitting here thinking. That girl knows about drugs. Ans if she can lie to get her dogs to Australia she knows how to smuggle drugs. It just didn't seem right when she was saying that.
You are presuming guilt. What you wrote is the definition of "unfair". You can tell that didn't happen not because of what you wrote but because her body language screams "lie".
Mer mer....wow, forget this particular case and just think about what you're saying there. If someone assaults and brutalises another person by conducting a "cavity search" it's the victim's fault. Either man or woman, there would never be a justification for doing such a thing.
She needs to go to jail!!!!!!!&
I believe that her statement regarding the “donations” versus “pledges” is the most blatant example of perjury, and should be prosecuted. This statement was made under oath.
These arguments against charging AH for lying under oath do not make any kind of sense. There are *several* instances when AH clearly lied during the trial. The police, trained in DV, were called TWICE & saw nothing even remotely suspicious is just one example. Or that the Op-Ed was not about JD when she not only made dog whistle references to JD in the article that a deaf person could hear and on the stand AH inadvertently confessed that she had indeed written the article about JD.
In my view her most ergregious lie was her denying knowing how JD's finger became injured, then changed her story to be that he cut off his finger himself with the phone by smashing it. When the phone was pictured undamaged, she claimed that the phone was on the wall, that claim was also proven false. Yet, she is on tape admitting that she had thrown the bottle and cut off the tip of JD's finger as she pleads for forgiveness. It was not admissible because the man she confessed to has since died? She confessed period.
Not charging AH only shows that lying under oath has no as in ZERO consequence and is a sham exercise. It should not be up to JD to call out her lies because she lied *to the court* . Therefore, the court should punish her since she has been caught clearly telling lies.
AH had a fresh bruise on her cheek *6 days* after she'd seen JD last when she staged the restraining order by alerting TMZ. Why wasn't an expert called in to explain how bruises heal. What about her lying about the photos she reused?
AH made a mockery of the judicial system and now her lawyer is making misleading statements and lying on TV for those who have not followed the trial to get worked up about.
This is a travesty and taints JD's complete vindication.
It was proven she lied when the TMZ guy verified the video was sent to them by Amber. Amber denied it and that's a lie.. Is that not perjury??
If she committed perjury prosecute her to the max and if found guilty:
🗣LOCK HER UP!!
Maybe this will send a message to some Women who lie regarding allegations of domestic violence by men.
For Real!!
🗣♊️👤
Men lie too. My ex falsely accuse me of punching him in the face and had me arrested, spent tens of thousands and dragged through both feeling in criminal court, couldn’t see my son for 40 days until the security camera showed that I didn’t do anything. Human beings lie and human beings can be victims this is about right wrong the truth and lies and that bish is a liar 💩
@@LaurenFromRhody401
I am a sorry for what happened to you and I hope you were made
whole.
Moreover, there is no doubt in my mind that some men lie too.
However, my comment was directed at Heard based on the evidence presented and her testimony during the trial.
Regarding some Women
lying about domestic violence, that was a general statement which does not put ALL WOMEN in that category and my opinion is based purely on logic.
More importantly, that statement previously made about some Women lying in no way, shape or form implies that some men are not guilty of doing the same thing.
IMO, Heard is dangerous and despicable and she needs help.
Str8 like that!!!
🗣♊️👤
Waldman statement was not defamatory, it was truth, said with malice.
My only disappointment is that this case was too big for Judge Judy to trial. She would have called out every lie
Judge Penny Azcarate
@@janesrensen1881 you missed the point😶
If she's not charged with perjury - that would send a message that it's ok to lie under oath and on the stand testifying with no consequences!
Unfortunately if the jury was able to see the other evidence out there, Amber wouldn't have won that one either.
16:35 She's playing out the way Johnny was supposed to behave and fails to act out the way her face was allegedly hit.
It means, it was her who pulled her arm back with the phone in it and her face was never hit. That's what her body language says.
Oops, then she points at her left cheek and eye that was hit .... but her bruises were on her right cheek!!! This is actually hilarious 😂
If I suffered and injury like this, I wouldn't describe in details how the hand of my attacker moved ... but I would definitely touch my face at the area where I was hit (and not the other side of my face!)
Then I wouldn't say "Johnny you hit me" but I would cry "my eye! my eye!"
Everything she said was her doing to Johnny. She twisted her own actions and contributed them to Johnny. It was her who became aggressive under the influence of alcohol, and we know she drank two bottles of wine daily. It's projection in it's finest.
Why is it tough to prove perjury? She said she gave $7 million away, but DID NOT!!!
She told so many lies, take your pick
Can you please explain why a jury would award a punitive amount *above* the state cap? Is it to send a message only or did they not understand that there's a state cap at $350,000?
They didn’t know there was a cap 🤙
Yeah I think all the judge told them was it had to be at least a dollar.
they didn't know
Virginia law specifically prohibits telling the jury about the cap on punitive damages. I searched it up and read it. My opinion as a regular person (I’m not a lawyer) is that hearing what the jury wanted to “punish” you with in punitive damages is to make a point - this is what the jury thought you should pay, what you really should be paying. That way the person understands how seriously the jury wanted to issue punishment-type damages.
@@trinitychani9931 thank you! You all have been so helpful
It's like she's making it up as she's telling it. She's way too detailed.
When I had to testify, There's a lot that I couldn't remember. She's very sick!
She's acting out the attacking part, not the receiving part of her stories.
If I was hit on my eye I wouldn't say "Johnny you hit me!" I would say "my eye! my eye!"
She's pointing at her left cheek having been hit but the bruise was on her right side.
She's full of rubbish.
I wouldn't have found it odd if AH didn't cry, we all process differently. What was telling was her effort to forcefully try to make herself sob continuously; with no physiological symptoms of emotional lacrimation/tears, ever. Coupled with the fact her acting coach testified that AH could only cry organically, *not* while acting. Add that her emotions changed drastically within seconds. The HPD dx by Dr Curry fits her perfectly. I hope she gets into intensive therapy, if not I fear for her childs safety.
I fear for the child’s safety as things stand.
Dr Curry's testimony was like a prophecy of exactly how she would behave.
There should be a petition for she and her sister to be charged with perjury, not once but three times in three different countries. The louder the voice the more the investigator will look into this.
What a bs interview from your guest attorney. She is SO biased it’s almost comical!!
Lol so true
Obviously this woman’s is on Amberside she says how he already redeemed himself so he doesn’t deserve anything no that’s 100% wrong she should be held accountable for the lying she did it’s obvious she lied do you realize what that could’ve done to him he could’ve went to prison even for this my God that was perjury she committed she should be held accountable
I feel the same way.
She is right though, lack of evidence cant necessarily mean that she is lying, BUT…. The slip up on the op ed is a really big evidence of lying.
Amberside? Isn't that in the Lake District? 😁😉
No jail in civil court..fyi
She should be held accountable for perjury just like everyone else who was held accountable for perjury. She choose to lie. Yes, If she's not held accountable will say a lot about our failed justice system. Amber was caught lying in court on more than one occassion.
yeh but her 1st lie that she never did coke can be proven a lie. there are all sorts of people who have done coke w/amber. these people can testify to that
Amber has a cocaine addiction too.
People SHE brought in said she did coke during all of the times she claimed she didn't.
@@T3rra8 yes anyone that does MDNA, mushrooms, adderal, sleeping pills and drinks bottles of wine everyday will do a line of coke too. im pretty sure that the pic of lines was her breakfast and her tampon straw. its highly unlikely whitney did coke w/johnny but amber said no. NO WAY!
What about her sister taking the stand? And then the email and testimony of Jennifer Howell? Wouldn't that be perjury 🤔?
As far as difficulty of proving her lies is concerned, let us take one simple example: she said yes when asked whether she had taken the video of JD banging the cabinets. This video was on her personal tablet. A few days later it was with TMZ who now owns the copyright of the video. She said no when she was asked whether she or her team had given the video to TMZ. However, a TMZ employee came and testified that it is only when a video comes directly from the content creator that TMZ does not have to verify anything and it can upload the video without any delay. TMZ was able to upload this video within 15 minutes. Additionally, there's that video from the UK trial where she slipped up and said, "because TMZ had been alerted."
She also tampered with and fabricated evidence.
I don't think the specialist here (Marie Pereira) knows the case well enough.
Completely agree. All bias aside, there are multiple examples of perjury/tampered evidence that can easily be proven. The TMZ one is easily one of the biggest.
Fantastic discussion. I learned so much about what a charge of perjury requires. Thank you!
Omfg this is so painful. Civil court does not require a proof beyond a reasonable doubt, criminal court does.
YES SHE COULD AND SHOULD NOW
@Nando Thanks for correction
How can Amber cry like that without tears? Also, her recordings proved she was the abuser.
I enjoyed this discussion 👍
What about when she stated the photos were taking at different times and with different lighting….. she knew that was not true and it was proven that the photo’s were edited. She knew the pictures were not taken at different times and with different lighting but she still chose to say that.
So basically people will probably now feel free to commit perjury.
If she can get away from making almost all false statements, then...guess everyone can?
They really need to take that law which will not be prosecuted- a non existent law.
Right... this is bad. Because other people who are maybe much better liars than AH, would be empowered to lie on the stand. And face no consequences.
So because she believes her lies to be true she can't face charges for lying under oath.
Make no mistake she believed her lies to be FALSE she manufactured them and evidence however it is a civil case and I don’t think that given the backlog of cases in court these days that they would prosecute
I think we need to differentiate between lack of evidence (they maybe telling the truth but have no evidence) and evidence that totally contradict the allegations (clearly misrepresenting facts to harm another). There should be consequences for the latter.
The lady is wrong, as there is a former colleague of AH, who says that he witnessed AH doing cocaine in recent years, whereas she said under oath that she stopped doing cocaine when she was 18.
Thats just one of the many.
Also, the manager of the trailer park contradicted her statement 100%
The TMZ, the photos, the donation, she was definitely lying about those no doubt.
What’s good for the goose is good for the gandor. Everyone should lie under oath! She was caught so many times lying but is exempt from arrest? BS!!!
The most convincing part for me was multiple police officers basically destroying the claim that she sustained injuries. Literally multiple police officers shredded her claims. how do you beat that? Multiple officers people. For me it was like after that i just was like... yeah she's just a liar
She lied so many times it should be easy !
Straight up lies .
Regarding perjury, you should ask about donation/pledge. That was perjury commited in the UK case.
I do hope AH & her gang get charged/corrected for so much lying, plotting, schemes... etc. Hope her child(ren) will not grow up duplicating her😰💝🙏
Thank you for answering my question
Yes, and I really wish they would charge her because she needs to be shown accountability!!!!
The photographs submitted to evidence alone should be enough evidence of her lying.
Amber does not believe in God so it would be so easy and not think twice to perjury herself. She’s not above the law and should be charged with perjury, she obviously knew she was perjuring herself every single time she took the stand; and reminded her she was still under oath.
She took an oath, she promised to tell the truth, help her God. She has no conscience whatsoever.
That woman should be prosecuted and held accountable, beyond defamation, for each and every crime involved in what she did
Amber Heard engaged in a destructive game with JD, one she started, one belonging to her narcistic frustrations, beliving that she could easily win it, taking advantage of some weak spot of JD she got acquainted to. She knows no shame. It is really a disgusting person
Well I’m sure Camille Vasquez has proven beyond reasonable doubt that she lied on the stand during the cross examination. She should be charged for falsifying evidence as well which could be proven by the digital forensics expert by getting a warrant on her devices that she refused to turn over.
having both amber heard and johnny depp do a polygraph test would solve this whole thing in minutes lol
I would love that to happen
This crazy witch probably believes her own lies. She would maybe even be able to pass the test, lmao
its not admissible in court right?
Amber would pass because she actually believes her lies.
Polygraph tests aren't accurate at all. They're wrong nearly 30% of the time. But I see where you're coming from. The psychological evaluation that Dr. Curry gave to Amber Heard is way more accurate than a polygraph test.
The judge should drag Elaine’s backside back into that courtroom- disrespecting the judge and jury is absolutely abhorrent!! How can she get away with spouting this rubbish
Because that is freedom of speech
great video!!
Thank you