Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

The Issue With Aircrafts In 40K

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 авг 2024
  • Trying something a little different. We're going to take a look at the issues with Aircraft in competitive 40k, but a rule that might salvage some of them.
    Maybe...
    Discord ► / discord
    Twitter ► / kimerexprojekt
    Twitch ► / kimerexprojekt
    00:00 - Start
    00:59 - Aircraft Rules In 40K
    5:01 - Interesting Hover Rules
    #gamesworkshop #warhammer40k #wh40k

Комментарии • 17

  • @KimerexProjekt
    @KimerexProjekt  7 месяцев назад +1

    New rabbit hole just dropped. Just realized Reserve and Strategic reserve are TWO different things. So small vid correction.
    🔴 Aircraft wouldn't reduce strategic reserve limit, it seems. So you could possibly run all of those ork aircraft and a couple on field units if you want... maybe... take pictures... post them on the Discord...

  • @captianolimar5194
    @captianolimar5194 7 месяцев назад +13

    As someone who plays WE, i for one am glad to not see aircraft too often. Haven’t quite figured out how to throw Exalted Eightbound that high

    • @KimerexProjekt
      @KimerexProjekt  7 месяцев назад +6

      Gotta get the forgefiends to juggle them :D

  • @thomaskunz8553
    @thomaskunz8553 7 месяцев назад +11

    We all have epic metal dragon purchasing issues.

  • @Spacefrisian
    @Spacefrisian 7 месяцев назад +2

    Having to measure from Hull makes for a large no entry from reserves zone, didnt realize this until you pointed it out.

  • @RoseBush1404
    @RoseBush1404 7 месяцев назад +3

    been recently looking at kitbashing some Imperial Guard aircraft using the Ork aircraft as a base, as I didn't want to pay forgeworld prices.
    I think it will be a lot of fun to run them in a list, but I do wish they had a bit more support with them, as you mentioned, they can't do much on the objectives or secondaries, and most stratagems don't work with them. so it does feel like they are just handicapping your self.
    one big thing I do wish they had was when aircraft shoot at ground targets they should get the 'Plunging Fire' rule that ruins have.

  • @kennethphillips6006
    @kennethphillips6006 7 месяцев назад +3

    Great vid! I hope to see more random thoughts!

  • @OEFarredondo
    @OEFarredondo 7 месяцев назад +6

    I never regret fielding heldrakes. They are kamikaze fighters. Might as well paint em as a Japanesr Zero

  • @Zilong17
    @Zilong17 7 месяцев назад +2

    I was gifted a Stormraven Gunship the other day and have been trying to fit it into a thematic RG list. Your video is oddly well timed.

  • @steelejack4846
    @steelejack4846 7 месяцев назад +2

    I wanna try using my Harpy in hover mode in the Vanguard Onslaught Detachment for Nids and see how much I can gain from the detachment rules despite it being way overcosted on my opinion.

  • @masongrae5010
    @masongrae5010 7 месяцев назад +2

    Eh by the rule of cool you did well do not doubt yourself but I will say two is enough no more heldrakes

  • @littlefoot4417
    @littlefoot4417 7 месяцев назад +1

    Aircraft don’t count towards the total of strategic reserves points

    • @KimerexProjekt
      @KimerexProjekt  7 месяцев назад

      Is that in the QA? Looking at aircraft it just says they have to start in 'Reserves'. The reserves section doesn't have anything that directly says 'Aircraft' don't count. Sometimes GW tucks this stuff behind odd sections. Mostly wondering to clarify.

    • @KimerexProjekt
      @KimerexProjekt  7 месяцев назад

      Oh... I think I see it. Strat Reserve V Reserve. A whole new rabbit hole.

  • @shorelineapprentice6563
    @shorelineapprentice6563 7 месяцев назад

    If aircrafts didnt get nefed its all you woud see. The real world military meta is aircraft.

  • @BB-pn2qv
    @BB-pn2qv 7 месяцев назад

    The problem… is 40K, the rule set is just not very good at all.