I have an R3 and getting an R1. I use all EF lenses purposely as I greatly, greatly prefer EF glass. EF has worked perfectly in my case. Only downside if you prefer RF lenses is that new EF glass will have worse resale value-so just buy them used in that case. I bought my EF glass new for fear that one day, before I die, I may be forced to buy RF glass.
16mm 2.8, 24mm 1.8, 35mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 2, 600mm 11, 800mm 11, except 50mm, all newly designed optics for RF, five of which are great and unique...
Yeah, I am spoiled coming from Sony, SOO many other options in so many price ranges! You have about 10 different options in each focal range on price and ranges at apertures you simply can not get reasonably on Canon right now. Nikon and Lumix as well have amazing lenses at super great prices... Canon being the Big Dog, you would think would want to take advantage of that as well. Thanks for watching! 😊😊
Exactly, and we don't have to go back that many years when good EF glass was expensive, now you can buy it for well under half the price. It's still quality glass, yes, if you're a sports journalist or nature photographer, you want the fast focus and quiet things of RF. But for the most part, there's plenty. I go for film primes, and here, there are good prices, even for RF glass.
Agree on most everything. But I came into the Canon system from Fuji X-H2S about 6 months ago. R6MII, Rf24-105 f4, RF 100-400, RF 16 f2.8, RF 50 f1.8. This is more than good enough for me until they open their mount, I can wait.
thats great man, and I do like the cameras for sure! I just like more options,, and if a person is not already invested in Canon and would like alternative options they are in a spot. But at least you can get all the basic primes, I just love my 2.8 Tamron G2 zoom! That would be amazing on a Canon Camera for 700 bucks! Thanks for watching!
Yeah if you're new to camera land, Canon is starting to focus on their professional crowd only. Canon's are what cameras you get when your business is doing well, is fast paced and needs a streamlined process. Color grading Canon footage is easier than others, they have lots of codecs for different video industy needs and for photography, their cameras are know as bulletproof and reliable. If you have a Canon, just invest in a good zoom. Then when you're ready to move on, you either chug the cool-aid and triple down cost wise, or begin a new journey with another brand. The Canon lenses, while expensive, certainly hold their value. I think for pro-sumers Nikon and Sony are solid hybrid choices, Panasonic does great video and Fuji, like Nikon, seems to have a promising future. Canon on the other hand, I think has it's tail tucked between it's legs in the prosumer category and is focusing on larger productions. Canon is however, up front in VR/AR/XR video.
I am just about at the point where I sell off my canon gear and move on to something else. I've been using adapters to meet my needs. I had a few of my old Zeiss lenses for my Contax RTS system and lenses like the 50mm f1.4 are wonderful, even with the adapter...but the downside for some is that you have to shoot in manual mode....big deal...that is what us old timers did back in the day. I think it would be hard pressed to find a big difference between the Zeiss 135mm and the equivalent ef or rf lens. My philosophy these days is to look for 90% of performance for 10% of the cost. As I shoot for fun and for myself....I am not going to pay thousands to canon to MAYBE get marginally better quality digital photos. I believe Canon is making a mistake not making reasonably priced lenses for the enthusiast. I totally agree with your presentation.
Well said! I also like getting lenses that offer great value for money! I will not pay 2000 for a lens when there are so many other options out there at a fraction of the cost with 90 percent the quality. Thanks for watching!
I have a sigma 18-35 1.8 on my 80d. It was the best bang for the buck back then and is still a great lens. It was all I could afford back then and I mean, I could barely afford that! It was about 400 odd quid. I could never dream of buying a lens over a grand. When the 80d dies ill prob just get a second hand 90d or something else that takes ef/efs or change brand.
it's STILL the only best bang for buck. That lens is solely keeping Canon APS-C alive, virtually no other f1.8 zoom like it. A Canon M50 is cheap and has fantastic little lenses like the 22mm f/2 pancake. EF-M is dead, but the R50's RF mount is more expensive and cannot adapt the wider spread of EF-M lenses even.
@jkteddy77 ive got an eosm and only have one m lens for it. I've adapted for efs and have a viltrox speed booster for the ef stuff. I've even adapted it for my om lens. I Like the camera. Absolutely terrible battery life though.
There is more hobbyists then professionals give the canon users some proconsumer lenses. If canon had the viltrox apsc lenses I would immediate purchase. We need to vote with our dollars.
Wake up Canon. I need an adapter to use the Canon R8 with Sony E mount lenses. I hope you make it as soon as possible. I hope it is available soon. Example of lenses I want to buy: Tamron 17-50mm f/4 Di III VXD Lens (Sony E) - USD $550 Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Lens - USD $700 Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 Lens for Sony E - USD $200 7artisans Photoelectric 50mm f/1.8 AF Lens (Sony E) - USD $228 Samyang AF 35mm f/1.8 FE Lens for Sony E - USD $350 Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 FE Lens for Sony E - USD $480
I am a software engineer. Just purchased a camera for fun and some family photo shooting. I purchased the Cannon R100, but now I am confused which lens to get. Cannon ones seems so expensive for me. I don't know why there is no great veltrox or tamaron optoions. If I knew better, I would purchase Sony Camera just for the options I have with budget lenses
@@superstringsbro correct! Basically your best option is a few sigma lenses on the RF mount if you want the low aperture lenses specificaly made for Crop sensor.
I bought a R50 a little over a year ago. While I love the pictures. I only have the 18-45 kit lens for it. Last winter I started looking for lens for it. Since I don't have a pile of EF lens floating around. Im like I have to pay how munch for a decant lens. I started looking at Sony around that time, and im like i can get at lest three lens for the cost of Cannon L glass. Recently ive been sucked into the lumix rabbit hole. The lens are cheaper, and you I can adopt pretty munch any lens. The video specs are also way better then any sub 2k cannon or sony.
YES! People dont get Lumix, until they get an S5II and MAAAAN the value for the money in that camera is insane, great lenses at good prices, especially if you get them used. Thanks for the comments!
@breakfastforyousoul I think it's because they have been sucked into the Sony full frame/fx30 stuff on social media. All the content creators say you need either of them camera's. To make great content. The thing is most people don't need full frame, or even most of specs of a fx30 for vlogs, or talking head vidoes. When a a6700 or the zv-e10 mark two. Will work the same. If you look at the video specs. It's the same sensor, and same recording specs as the fx30 data wise. I think any one looking to shoot videos mostly. Should download as many unedited log vidoes they can. Of clog, slog, and vlog, and put them in what ever video editor they use. I can see the difference between all three, and the winner is vlog. Another thing is mft gets a bad rap in the picture world. It's more then good enough for hobbiest. Most people will never be able to tell the difference between apsc, full frame, and aft. Unless you told them.
They have those, but the 24-240 starts at 4 and ends with 6.3 aperture. For comparison, you can get a used tamron 28-200 for around 500-550 bucks and the aperture is 2.8-5.6 Its almost half the size with better aperture, better picture quality and better price..
Just like options! that is the main point. Nothing wrong with sticking with what you have, but for me part of the fun of owning a camera is trying out new lenses. And the only reason we dont have other options is the fact that Canon will not allow them in. Thanks for watching!😊😊
Struggling with the same thing. There's virtually no Super Ultra Wide Astophotography options like there is for Sony and Nikon. In Canon's APS-C system and paralyzed to make a single deeper purchase into Canon FF when I'm starved enough. Truly can't beat those colors though, so maybe Nikon is the answer rather than Sony
This is the reason I gave up on canon, I had a canon R and I wanted a prime lens the only ones available at the time were $2k+ and that was WAY more than I wanted to spend. I ended up staying with Sony and eventually added some more expensive glass but I was able to upgrade lenses at my own pace
Yeah that's the good ole greed. They are closing down alternative options to make sure that all purchases are directly through cannon. that's exactly how you close down your market. people will move on to less restrictive camera systems for their lenses because cannon priced themselves out the market.
Exactly! If enough people speak with their wallets, they will change or at some point Sony may overtake them, Nikon is coming hard too! Thanks for watching man!🙂🙂
@@bamhamer I know right! when you own any of the other systems you KNOW! The options are nice to have, part of the fun of owning a camera! Thanks for the comments!😀
But... we have a 24mm lens and a 35mm and a 50mm. Not to speak of a 28-70mm zoom... All at reasonable prices. These are already out there for the hobbyists. The ones recently released are for those people who want a bit more weather sealing and quality. What are we talking about here?
what about a 55 or a zoom 2.8 for under 800 dollars? 17-28 2.8 under 800, and options for 3rd party an MUCH lower prices. I get it that some would pay extra for the canon glass, thats cool, I just want the option and you do not have that with Canon FF. If you want anything other than the kit lens or basic prime under 1000 you are out of luck or you have to adapt an old lens, but thats just not for me and some others dont want to do that either. Just my opinion, I appreciate your feedback😀
@breakfastforyousoul I have Canon, Sigma, Zeiss Milvus, Laowa, Rokinon, and vintage m42 lenses. I adapt them all to my R6 MKII and R7. I pity those who feel "limited"...
@@breakfastforyousoul The one thing I agree with you on is that we could have more Sigma Tamron and others on the RF mount - I am so bummed that I cannot get the Samyang 24-70 on the RF or EF mounts. But I think Canon's non L lenses are really good value and quality and I don't feel as though I am missing (too) much apart from that sweet 24-70. So yes, please Canon open up the RF mount to 3rd parties, but I think they have us covered at the moment
@@b2gun6s I take your pity, and will enjoy my less expensive Native lenses on my other Cameras. Its great if you have all of the other lenses already and that they work well for you!😊😊 If I had a bunch of older lenses to adapt I would, but why spend that kind of money on older lenses when I can buy new ones for the same price on other systems.... Thanks for watching!😊😊
As a Canon R6MKii user myself I do agree that they are basically shooting themselves in the foot with this whole " we dont want to cross brand our RF mount" nonsense. That being said, They did create a semi affordable range of professional glass away from entry level users, however the variable Fstops are what are deterring any potential new prospect customer from buying those lenses. When I bought my r6mkii I invested in the 50mm1.8 the 16mm, 85mm F2, and the 24-105F4L lens. Apart from those lenses its cheaper and more cost effective to just dish out the 200 bucks on the EF-RF adapter and buy any older EF L Series glass like the 24-70 2.8, the 50mm1.2, the 85mm 1.2, the 70-200 2.8 since they are no longer making EF lenses anymore or DSLR bodies. I've wanted to love my camera but I also find myself hating the fact that Sony has all these lens options for 1/3rd the cost. I'll probably be jumping the Canon ship again at some point too and going back to Sony to a A7rii or A7Riv.
Your totally right man! The F stop glass is where your really get blasted outside the basic primes. Its just about optiions! ALL the other brands have opened up their mount! Thanks for watching!😀
У меня был Canon M50. Это первая и последняя моя камера от этой компании. Слава богу я быстро понял что такое молоток инвалида от Canon. Больше я с этой компанией связываться не хочу. Как они урезают возможности своей продукции и как относятся к своим клиентам. Больше я никогда не буду инвестировать в Canon. Точка!
Understand the frustration! I think they make good cameras, just totally disagree with the 3rd party glass lockdown! Gotta speak with my wallet! Thank you for the comments!😀
Canon R, does not have many options for a budget. With my Nikon Z5 and Z50, I use Sony E, and Canon EF, with adapters. For me the Nikon Z system, gives me more lens options from lenses I already own. --- I tried to make the Canon R8 work for me. Expensive lens choices kept me from using R8 for what I wanted. The R8 is a good camera, just not for me. I tried it.
Yeah the basic primes are good for many, its just when you come from Sony or the others man those 2.8 zooms are nice and you cant get a native 2.8 zoom like a G2 tamron. and other primes like the 55 1.8 , just something about that lens, and Sigam 28-70 2.8 is great too! If you like unique lenses on a budget you have to adapt, but that is not for me. Thanks for watchng!
@breakfastforyousoul If your issue is budget then you can also get cheap used EF glass that is better and more affordable used than the Tamron and will work better than on any EF camera. 👀
@@gavinstratospherec453 I did go with Sony, and Nikon and Lumix, and am happy with all of them. Never have to MOAN about them because I have the options, just trying to help Canon users, surely many of them would want those options too if you could have them right? Thanks for watching!🙂🙂
I have been saying for months now that the regular RF lenses are terrible, so now Canon is admitting this fact. I never went to Canon when they went to mirrorless because their regular lenses are crap and their L glass is too expensive.
Yeah, I've come to the same conclusion that as a non-professional, it's time to ditch the Canon in favor of Sony or Nikon FF, since Nikon has awesome budget/affordable lenses (35mm f1.4, 40mm f2, 50mm f1.4) and both Nikon/Sony have plenty of third-party native mirrorless lenses. Sure, I could continue using the EF lenses with the EF-RF adapter, but that screws the whole balance point of the camera and some of the new stuff is only available for mirrorless-native mounts, like the new Tamron 28-75 G2.
RIGHT! for a hobbyist like me I dont like spending big money on a camera and being pigeon holed when a ALL the other brands allow other alternatives. Thanks for our feedback!😀
I have an R3 and getting an R1. I use all EF lenses purposely as I greatly, greatly prefer EF glass. EF has worked perfectly in my case. Only downside if you prefer RF lenses is that new EF glass will have worse resale value-so just buy them used in that case. I bought my EF glass new for fear that one day, before I die, I may be forced to buy RF glass.
16mm 2.8, 24mm 1.8, 35mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 2, 600mm 11, 800mm 11, except 50mm, all newly designed optics for RF, five of which are great and unique...
Yeah, I am spoiled coming from Sony, SOO many other options in so many price ranges! You have about 10 different options in each focal range on price and ranges at apertures you simply can not get reasonably on Canon right now.
Nikon and Lumix as well have amazing lenses at super great prices... Canon being the Big Dog, you would think would want to take advantage of that as well. Thanks for watching! 😊😊
maybe RF to EF adapter might fill that void?
That's what I do. There's also the used market no big deal... As far as licensing RF mount, it will work itself out in time.
Exactly. A ton of affordable EF glass that works great.
Exactly, and we don't have to go back that many years when good EF glass was expensive, now you can buy it for well under half the price. It's still quality glass, yes, if you're a sports journalist or nature photographer, you want the fast focus and quiet things of RF. But for the most part, there's plenty. I go for film primes, and here, there are good prices, even for RF glass.
Exactly
Agree on most everything. But I came into the Canon system from Fuji X-H2S about 6 months ago. R6MII, Rf24-105 f4, RF 100-400, RF 16 f2.8, RF 50 f1.8. This is more than good enough for me until they open their mount, I can wait.
thats great man, and I do like the cameras for sure! I just like more options,, and if a person is not already invested in Canon and would like alternative options they are in a spot. But at least you can get all the basic primes, I just love my 2.8 Tamron G2 zoom! That would be amazing on a Canon Camera for 700 bucks! Thanks for watching!
Gives me an incentive to work harder
Go get em! Nothing wrong with that!
Yeah if you're new to camera land, Canon is starting to focus on their professional crowd only. Canon's are what cameras you get when your business is doing well, is fast paced and needs a streamlined process. Color grading Canon footage is easier than others, they have lots of codecs for different video industy needs and for photography, their cameras are know as bulletproof and reliable. If you have a Canon, just invest in a good zoom. Then when you're ready to move on, you either chug the cool-aid and triple down cost wise, or begin a new journey with another brand. The Canon lenses, while expensive, certainly hold their value. I think for pro-sumers Nikon and Sony are solid hybrid choices, Panasonic does great video and Fuji, like Nikon, seems to have a promising future. Canon on the other hand, I think has it's tail tucked between it's legs in the prosumer category and is focusing on larger productions. Canon is however, up front in VR/AR/XR video.
I am just about at the point where I sell off my canon gear and move on to something else. I've been using adapters to meet my needs. I had a few of my old Zeiss lenses for my Contax RTS system and lenses like the 50mm f1.4 are wonderful, even with the adapter...but the downside for some is that you have to shoot in manual mode....big deal...that is what us old timers did back in the day. I think it would be hard pressed to find a big difference between the Zeiss 135mm and the equivalent ef or rf lens. My philosophy these days is to look for 90% of performance for 10% of the cost. As I shoot for fun and for myself....I am not going to pay thousands to canon to MAYBE get marginally better quality digital photos. I believe Canon is making a mistake not making reasonably priced lenses for the enthusiast. I totally agree with your presentation.
Well said! I also like getting lenses that offer great value for money! I will not pay 2000 for a lens when there are so many other options out there at a fraction of the cost with 90 percent the quality. Thanks for watching!
I have a sigma 18-35 1.8 on my 80d. It was the best bang for the buck back then and is still a great lens. It was all I could afford back then and I mean, I could barely afford that! It was about 400 odd quid. I could never dream of buying a lens over a grand. When the 80d dies ill prob just get a second hand 90d or something else that takes ef/efs or change brand.
it's STILL the only best bang for buck. That lens is solely keeping Canon APS-C alive, virtually no other f1.8 zoom like it.
A Canon M50 is cheap and has fantastic little lenses like the 22mm f/2 pancake. EF-M is dead, but the R50's RF mount is more expensive and cannot adapt the wider spread of EF-M lenses even.
@jkteddy77 ive got an eosm and only have one m lens for it. I've adapted for efs and have a viltrox speed booster for the ef stuff. I've even adapted it for my om lens. I Like the camera. Absolutely terrible battery life though.
Yeah great lens! hard to let those go for sure!
There is more hobbyists then professionals give the canon users some proconsumer lenses. If canon had the viltrox apsc lenses I would immediate purchase. We need to vote with our dollars.
TRUTH!!!
Wake up Canon.
I need an adapter to use the Canon R8 with Sony E mount lenses. I hope you make it as soon as possible. I hope it is available soon.
Example of lenses I want to buy:
Tamron 17-50mm f/4 Di III VXD Lens (Sony E) - USD $550
Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Lens - USD $700
Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 Lens for Sony E - USD $200
7artisans Photoelectric 50mm f/1.8 AF Lens (Sony E) - USD $228
Samyang AF 35mm f/1.8 FE Lens for Sony E - USD $350
Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 FE Lens for Sony E - USD $480
Totally agree
I am a software engineer. Just purchased a camera for fun and some family photo shooting.
I purchased the Cannon R100, but now I am confused which lens to get. Cannon ones seems so expensive for me. I don't know why there is no great veltrox or tamaron optoions.
If I knew better, I would purchase Sony Camera just for the options I have with budget lenses
You have only a few options
@@superstringsbro correct! Basically your best option is a few sigma lenses on the RF mount if you want the low aperture lenses specificaly made for Crop sensor.
@@breakfastforyousoul I think it’s only 2. And I wouldn’t even buy them because they’re not even sharp.
Budget?
Canon R&D: LOL
YEP!
I bought a R50 a little over a year ago. While I love the pictures. I only have the 18-45 kit lens for it. Last winter I started looking for lens for it. Since I don't have a pile of EF lens floating around. Im like I have to pay how munch for a decant lens. I started looking at Sony around that time, and im like i can get at lest three lens for the cost of Cannon L glass. Recently ive been sucked into the lumix rabbit hole. The lens are cheaper, and you I can adopt pretty munch any lens. The video specs are also way better then any sub 2k cannon or sony.
YES! People dont get Lumix, until they get an S5II and MAAAAN the value for the money in that camera is insane, great lenses at good prices, especially if you get them used. Thanks for the comments!
@breakfastforyousoul I think it's because they have been sucked into the Sony full frame/fx30 stuff on social media. All the content creators say you need either of them camera's. To make great content. The thing is most people don't need full frame, or even most of specs of a fx30 for vlogs, or talking head vidoes. When a a6700 or the zv-e10 mark two. Will work the same. If you look at the video specs. It's the same sensor, and same recording specs as the fx30 data wise. I think any one looking to shoot videos mostly. Should download as many unedited log vidoes they can. Of clog, slog, and vlog, and put them in what ever video editor they use. I can see the difference between all three, and the winner is vlog. Another thing is mft gets a bad rap in the picture world. It's more then good enough for hobbiest. Most people will never be able to tell the difference between apsc, full frame, and aft. Unless you told them.
I am using my old EF lens mount with the R adaptor. But I fully agree with your comment. Customer should have a choice to use the Sigma or Tamron.
AMEN! Thats all I am saying! Thanks for watching!🙂🙂
The cheapest lens is how much? I thought they had the 28mm, 50mm and 24-240?
They have those, but the 24-240 starts at 4 and ends with 6.3 aperture. For comparison, you can get a used tamron 28-200 for around 500-550 bucks and the aperture is 2.8-5.6 Its almost half the size with better aperture, better picture quality and better price..
2words: adapter, baby. I'm sticking to efs. $crew them.
Yep that is your best opiton, only option in Canon.
Why do you need to switch? All of a sudden your current lenses no longer work?
Just like options! that is the main point. Nothing wrong with sticking with what you have, but for me part of the fun of owning a camera is trying out new lenses. And the only reason we dont have other options is the fact that Canon will not allow them in. Thanks for watching!😊😊
Struggling with the same thing. There's virtually no Super Ultra Wide Astophotography options like there is for Sony and Nikon.
In Canon's APS-C system and paralyzed to make a single deeper purchase into Canon FF when I'm starved enough. Truly can't beat those colors though, so maybe Nikon is the answer rather than Sony
Yep! You got it!
Agree completely
This is the reason I gave up on canon, I had a canon R and I wanted a prime lens the only ones available at the time were $2k+ and that was WAY more than I wanted to spend. I ended up staying with Sony and eventually added some more expensive glass but I was able to upgrade lenses at my own pace
Totally Agree! Sony, lumix Nikon all have better lens options for the hobbyist. Thanks for the comments man!
Yeah that's the good ole greed. They are closing down alternative options to make sure that all purchases are directly through cannon. that's exactly how you close down your market. people will move on to less restrictive camera systems for their lenses because cannon priced themselves out the market.
Exactly! If enough people speak with their wallets, they will change or at some point Sony may overtake them, Nikon is coming hard too! Thanks for watching man!🙂🙂
Dude thats why i left Canon, all i wanted was some third party lenses from Sigma but Canon wont allow you to
Same. Just sold my canon gear and switched to sony. Couldn't take it anymore
YEP! You got that rigtht man! It just frustrating and I have to speak with my wallet. Thanks for watching
@@bamhamer I know right! when you own any of the other systems you KNOW! The options are nice to have, part of the fun of owning a camera! Thanks for the comments!😀
All, because Canon produces its own lenses. It is expected that all Canon users will use/buy Canon lenses.😂
Абсолютно согласен. Canon уже и по качеству стал хуже Fujifilm
But... we have a 24mm lens and a 35mm and a 50mm. Not to speak of a 28-70mm zoom... All at reasonable prices. These are already out there for the hobbyists. The ones recently released are for those people who want a bit more weather sealing and quality. What are we talking about here?
what about a 55 or a zoom 2.8 for under 800 dollars? 17-28 2.8 under 800, and options for 3rd party an MUCH lower prices. I get it that some would pay extra for the canon glass, thats cool, I just want the option and you do not have that with Canon FF. If you want anything other than the kit lens or basic prime under 1000 you are out of luck or you have to adapt an old lens, but thats just not for me and some others dont want to do that either. Just my opinion, I appreciate your feedback😀
@breakfastforyousoul I have Canon, Sigma, Zeiss Milvus, Laowa, Rokinon, and vintage m42 lenses. I adapt them all to my R6 MKII and R7. I pity those who feel "limited"...
@@breakfastforyousoul The one thing I agree with you on is that we could have more Sigma Tamron and others on the RF mount - I am so bummed that I cannot get the Samyang 24-70 on the RF or EF mounts. But I think Canon's non L lenses are really good value and quality and I don't feel as though I am missing (too) much apart from that sweet 24-70. So yes, please Canon open up the RF mount to 3rd parties, but I think they have us covered at the moment
@@b2gun6s I take your pity, and will enjoy my less expensive Native lenses on my other Cameras. Its great if you have all of the other lenses already and that they work well for you!😊😊 If I had a bunch of older lenses to adapt I would, but why spend that kind of money on older lenses when I can buy new ones for the same price on other systems.... Thanks for watching!😊😊
As a Canon R6MKii user myself I do agree that they are basically shooting themselves in the foot with this whole " we dont want to cross brand our RF mount" nonsense. That being said, They did create a semi affordable range of professional glass away from entry level users, however the variable Fstops are what are deterring any potential new prospect customer from buying those lenses. When I bought my r6mkii I invested in the 50mm1.8 the 16mm, 85mm F2, and the 24-105F4L lens. Apart from those lenses its cheaper and more cost effective to just dish out the 200 bucks on the EF-RF adapter and buy any older EF L Series glass like the 24-70 2.8, the 50mm1.2, the 85mm 1.2, the 70-200 2.8 since they are no longer making EF lenses anymore or DSLR bodies. I've wanted to love my camera but I also find myself hating the fact that Sony has all these lens options for 1/3rd the cost. I'll probably be jumping the Canon ship again at some point too and going back to Sony to a A7rii or A7Riv.
Your totally right man! The F stop glass is where your really get blasted outside the basic primes. Its just about optiions! ALL the other brands have opened up their mount! Thanks for watching!😀
У меня был Canon M50. Это первая и последняя моя камера от этой компании. Слава богу я быстро понял что такое молоток инвалида от Canon. Больше я с этой компанией связываться не хочу. Как они урезают возможности своей продукции и как относятся к своим клиентам. Больше я никогда не буду инвестировать в Canon. Точка!
Understand the frustration! I think they make good cameras, just totally disagree with the 3rd party glass lockdown! Gotta speak with my wallet! Thank you for the comments!😀
Canon R, does not have many options for a budget. With my Nikon Z5 and Z50, I use Sony E, and Canon EF, with adapters. For me the Nikon Z system, gives me more lens options from lenses I already own.
--- I tried to make the Canon R8 work for me. Expensive lens choices kept me from using R8 for what I wanted. The R8 is a good camera, just not for me. I tried it.
Yeah I hear ya, I like it but with my Nikon and sony, I rarely use it now... Will probably sell it when the a7v comes out. Thanks for watching!🙂🙂
What option are you missing ?
Like they are supposed to sell the 70 200 F2.8 for 1K ?
There's plenty of cheap FF lenses under 1K...
Yeah the basic primes are good for many, its just when you come from Sony or the others man those 2.8 zooms are nice and you cant get a native 2.8 zoom like a G2 tamron. and other primes like the 55 1.8 , just something about that lens, and Sigam 28-70 2.8 is great too! If you like unique lenses on a budget you have to adapt, but that is not for me. Thanks for watchng!
@breakfastforyousoul If your issue is budget then you can also get cheap used EF glass that is better and more affordable used than the Tamron and will work better than on any EF camera. 👀
@@mousbleu well said - this bloke just spends 10mins moaning about something we all know.... Go with Sony if Sigma lenses are important. Quit moaning.
@@gavinstratospherec453 I did go with Sony, and Nikon and Lumix, and am happy with all of them. Never have to MOAN about them because I have the options, just trying to help Canon users, surely many of them would want those options too if you could have them right? Thanks for watching!🙂🙂
Отлично свелись цвета на обоих камерах в твоём видео.
I know right! LOL that is sony and Nikon,who would have thought their standard mode was so close! I did not adjust anything! Thanks for watching man!😀
I have been saying for months now that the regular RF lenses are terrible, so now Canon is admitting this fact.
I never went to Canon when they went to mirrorless because their regular lenses are crap and their L glass is too expensive.
Yeah, I've come to the same conclusion that as a non-professional, it's time to ditch the Canon in favor of Sony or Nikon FF, since Nikon has awesome budget/affordable lenses (35mm f1.4, 40mm f2, 50mm f1.4) and both Nikon/Sony have plenty of third-party native mirrorless lenses. Sure, I could continue using the EF lenses with the EF-RF adapter, but that screws the whole balance point of the camera and some of the new stuff is only available for mirrorless-native mounts, like the new Tamron 28-75 G2.
RIGHT! for a hobbyist like me I dont like spending big money on a camera and being pigeon holed when a ALL the other brands allow other alternatives. Thanks for our feedback!😀