Видео

The cheapest lens is how much? I thought they had the 28mm, 50mm and 24-240?

Gives me an incentive to work harder

Why do you need to switch? All of a sudden your current lenses no longer work?

I have an R3 and getting an R1. I use all EF lenses purposely as I greatly, greatly EF glass. EF has worked perfectly in my case. Only downside if you prefer RF lenses is that new EF glass will have worse resale value-so just buy them used in that case. I bought my EF glass new for fear that one day, before I die, I may be forced to buy RF glass.

16mm 2.8, 24mm 1.8, 35mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 2, 600mm 11, 800mm 11, except 50mm, all newly designed optics for RF, five of which are great and unique...

I am just about at the point where I sell off my canon gear and move on to something else. I've been using adapters to meet my needs. I had a few of my old Zeiss lenses for my Contax RTS system and lenses like the 50mm f1.4 are wonderful, even with the adapter...but the downside for some is that you have to shoot in manual mode....big deal...that is what us old timers did back in the day. I think it would be hard pressed to find a big difference between the Zeiss 135mm and the equivalent ef or rf lens. My philosophy these days is to look for 90% of performance for 10% of the cost. As I shoot for fun and for myself....I am not going to pay thousands to canon to MAYBE get marginally better quality digital photos. I believe Canon is making a mistake not making reasonably priced lenses for the enthusiast. I totally agree with your presentation.

I bought a R50 a little over a year ago. While I love the pictures. I only have the 18-45 kit lens for it. Last winter I started looking for lens for it. Since I don't have a pile of EF lens floating around. Im like I have to pay how munch for a decant lens. I started looking at Sony around that time, and im like i can get at lest three lens for the cost of Cannon L glass. Recently ive been sucked into the lumix rabbit hole. The lens are cheaper, and you I can adopt pretty munch any lens. The video specs are also way better then any sub 2k cannon or sony.

I can’t even tell the difference between 2.8 and 4. Save your money if you’re staying in the studio

Totally agree

Yeah if you're new to camera land, Canon is starting to focus on their professional crowd only. Canon's are what cameras you get when your business is doing well, is fast paced and needs a streamlined process. Color grading Canon footage is easier than others, they have lots of codecs for different video industy needs and for photography, their cameras are know as bulletproof and reliable. If you have a Canon, just invest in a good zoom. Then when you're ready to move on, you either chug the cool-aid and triple down cost wise, or begin a new journey with another brand. The Canon lenses, while expensive, certainly hold their value. I think for pro-sumers Nikon and Sony are solid hybrid choices, Panasonic does great video and Fuji, like Nikon, seems to have a promising future. Canon on the other hand, I think has it's tail tucked between it's legs in the prosumer category and is focusing on larger productions. Canon is however, up front in VR/AR/XR video.

Wake up Canon. I need an adapter to use the Canon R8 with Sony E mount lenses. I hope you make it as soon as possible. I hope it is available soon. Example of lenses I want to buy: Tamron 17-50mm f/4 Di III VXD Lens (Sony E) - USD $550 Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Lens - USD $700 Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 Lens for Sony E - USD $200 7artisans Photoelectric 50mm f/1.8 AF Lens (Sony E) - USD $228 Samyang AF 35mm f/1.8 FE Lens for Sony E - USD $350 Rokinon AF 50mm f/1.4 FE Lens for Sony E - USD $480

Struggling with the same thing. There's virtually no Super Ultra Wide Astophotography options like there is for Sony and Nikon. In Canon's APS-C system and paralyzed to make a single deeper purchase into Canon FF when I'm starved enough. Truly can't beat those colors though, so maybe Nikon is the answer rather than Sony

There is more hobbyists then professionals give the canon users some proconsumer lenses. If canon had the viltrox apsc lenses I would immediate purchase. We need to vote with our dollars.

Budget? Canon R&D: LOL

I have been saying for months now that the regular RF lenses are terrible, so now Canon is admitting this fact. I never went to Canon when they went to mirrorless because their regular lenses are crap and their L glass is too expensive.

I am a software engineer. Just purchased a camera for fun and some family photo shooting. I purchased the Cannon R100, but now I am confused which lens to get. Cannon ones seems so expensive for me. I don't know why there is no great veltrox or tamaron optoions. If I knew better, I would purchase Sony Camera just for the options I have with budget lenses

I am using my old EF lens mount with the R adaptor. But I fully agree with your comment. Customer should have a choice to use the Sigma or Tamron.

I have a sigma 18-35 1.8 on my 80d. It was the best bang for the buck back then and is still a great lens. It was all I could afford back then and I mean, I could barely afford that! It was about 400 odd quid. I could never dream of buying a lens over a grand. When the 80d dies ill prob just get a second hand 90d or something else that takes ef/efs or change brand.

Agree on most everything. But I came into the Canon system from Fuji X-H2S about 6 months ago. R6MII, Rf24-105 f4, RF 100-400, RF 16 f2.8, RF 50 f1.8. This is more than good enough for me until they open their mount, I can wait.

All, because Canon produces its own lenses. It is expected that all Canon users will use/buy Canon lenses.😂

Yeah, I've come to the same conclusion that as a non-professional, it's time to ditch the Canon in favor of Sony or Nikon FF, since Nikon has awesome budget/affordable lenses (35mm f1.4, 40mm f2, 50mm f1.4) and both Nikon/Sony have plenty of third-party native mirrorless lenses. Sure, I could continue using the EF lenses with the EF-RF adapter, but that screws the whole balance point of the camera and some of the new stuff is only available for mirrorless-native mounts, like the new Tamron 28-75 G2.

As a Canon R6MKii user myself I do agree that they are basically shooting themselves in the foot with this whole " we dont want to cross brand our RF mount" nonsense. That being said, They did create a semi affordable range of professional glass away from entry level users, however the variable Fstops are what are deterring any potential new prospect customer from buying those lenses. When I bought my r6mkii I invested in the 50mm1.8 the 16mm, 85mm F2, and the 24-105F4L lens. Apart from those lenses its cheaper and more cost effective to just dish out the 200 bucks on the EF-RF adapter and buy any older EF L Series glass like the 24-70 2.8, the 50mm1.2, the 85mm 1.2, the 70-200 2.8 since they are no longer making EF lenses anymore or DSLR bodies. I've wanted to love my camera but I also find myself hating the fact that Sony has all these lens options for 1/3rd the cost. I'll probably be jumping the Canon ship again at some point too and going back to Sony to a A7rii or A7Riv.

У меня был Canon M50. Это первая и последняя моя камера от этой компании. Слава богу я быстро понял что такое молоток инвалида от Canon. Больше я с этой компанией связываться не хочу. Как они урезают возможности своей продукции и как относятся к своим клиентам. Больше я никогда не буду инвестировать в Canon. Точка!

Отлично свелись цвета на обоих камерах в твоём видео.

Абсолютно согласен. Canon уже и по качеству стал хуже Fujifilm

Dude thats why i left Canon, all i wanted was some third party lenses from Sigma but Canon wont allow you to

2words: adapter, baby. I'm sticking to efs. $crew them.

maybe RF to EF adapter might fill that void?

Like they are supposed to sell the 70 200 F2.8 for 1K ? There's plenty of cheap FF lenses under 1K...

Agree completely

But... we have a 24mm lens and a 35mm and a 50mm. Not to speak of a 28-70mm zoom... All at reasonable prices. These are already out there for the hobbyists. The ones recently released are for those people who want a bit more weather sealing and quality. What are we talking about here?

4k60 overheating in 35mins in a controlled temp room. Ridiculous. Switched over to Panasonic because of this.

This is the reason I gave up on canon, I had a canon R and I wanted a prime lens the only ones available at the time were $2k+ and that was WAY more than I wanted to spend. I ended up staying with Sony and eventually added some more expensive glass but I was able to upgrade lenses at my own pace

Yeah that's the good ole greed. They are closing down alternative options to make sure that all purchases are directly through cannon. that's exactly how you close down your market. people will move on to less restrictive camera systems for their lenses because cannon priced themselves out the market.

Canon R, does not have many options for a budget. With my Nikon Z5 and Z50, I use Sony E, and Canon EF, with adapters. For me the Nikon Z system, gives me more lens options from lenses I already own. --- I tried to make the Canon R8 work for me. Expensive lens choices kept me from using R8 for what I wanted. The R8 is a good camera, just not for me. I tried it.

Is there an English version for this video?

Great Job on your experience and explanation, I shoot with the sony zve1, a7c, fuji xt1, fuji xt10, just as a hobbyist and for some youtube stuff. There's way to many people RUclips critics on cameras, seems like they're never satisfied with what they own. I like your channel format and explanation, sometimes we have to ask ourselves what is it were chasing, because all of this gear is $$$ for the hobbyist

Первый лайк да ещё и из России😁

Nikon Z6III is a super solid choice. I would trust it for professional work; no problem.

Hello, how many feet are you from the camera in this video?

AF Better than z6ii but not better or equal to a7iv

If you’re in a camera system already it doesn’t make much sense to jump around to another brand, be it Sony, Nikon, Canon etc especially in the same price range. Panasonic is great for what you get even if it’s older tech. If you need to jump up to higher tier of cameras for pro work (sports organization, film crews, production sets ) then that’s where you have to decide on what brand you need.

Размытие фона хорошее. Не больше ни меньше

Резкозть хорошая, но немного дрожит при динамической стабилизации

Лайк брат. Это круто!

hye..nice content btw..how about 1080p../which one is betterbr8 vs a7cii

Hey I have been using osmo pocket 3 and would like to switch to zve10ii or a6700 which would u recommend

I switched all my fuji gear (XT5 n lens) after their last announcement (fuji) to the z6iii, I'm quite happy to the AFC results on birding (but lens weight...is damn.... heavy...) N got a way better hit rate then fuji... Fuji afc focus green box is just untrustble (firmware4.0). But simple afs is fine... (but sometimes still could focus outside the box when shooting birds in tree.... lol)

Yo ,I nearly spat out my coffee , I was just searching an actual real AF test for the nikon z6III , and let me say I didnt expect that intro referencing my video ahaha. ps. af seems solid , minor glitches but all cameras do that sometime on the fastest speed, great work showing it

Nikon Af still level of Fujifilm 😮