Darrell Brooks Calls State of Wisconsin to Testify, Wants to Face Accuser
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 окт 2022
- Darrell Brooks filed a subpoena to call the state of Wisconsin to the stand to testify, stating he has a right to face his accuser. "How can they not be subpoenaed to testify if they're the plaintiff?" Brooks asked the judge, who told him he named an entity, not a person.
#DarrellBrooks #WaukeshaParade #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam - Развлечения
"Im a sovereign citizen, your laws dont apply to me"
Gets convicted
"My constitutional rights have been violated"
😂
I don’t understand what he means when he calls himself a sovereign citizen. Why does he keep saying this?
@@oldhollywoodfan8009 loones conspiracy theorist that think the rules don't apply to them
@@oldhollywoodfan8009 because he's an uneducated far right winger. They are all like this.
Sovereign Citizens seem to believe that laws don’t apply to them. Or some shenanigans like that. They’re quick to say laws do not apply when they are in the wrong, but as soon as their “constitutional rights” are violated, they all of a sudden conform to the laws… it’s BS, this dude is just playing games.
The State of Wisconsin politely declines to appear as a witness due to being too large to physically enter the courtroom
That’s a great point
"I object to that"
Grounds?
Subject matter jurisdiction
Is that a judicial determination?
love how darrel somehow thinks he's found a loophole that no one else has found 🤦
This is a standard card that’s played by Sov Cit’s along with jurisdiction and name in all caps rubbish. Every SoV Cit to use this playbook has been convicted yet it still goes on.
I love when he refers to himself as "my client" 😂😂
And then says "I"
😂
He keeps referring to himself in the first person when he wants rights and the third person when he wants to deflect. He’s illiterate and should have counsel forced on him.
The state of Wisconsin will not testify so i move for dismissal
Objection! Relevance!
This judge is patiently trying to explain algebra to a goldfish.
😂😂😂😂 this comment wins the internet today
I object 😂😂😂
😂😂😂 excellent
Oh thanks. I needed that. That was brilliant . I can go do my laundry now.
Good🎉 one!
This judge could teach how to not lose your mind when dealing with an adult toddler narcissist. She is incredible!
So true. I'm blown away on the defendant asking cold .questions.
An murderer don’t forget that..
HAHAHA, Adult Toddler Narcissist 😂😂😂😂
you're a spoonfed bootlicking trashcan of a human
I hope she gets to retire after this farce of a trial!
She deserves it!
She has more patience than Job!
I've never wanted to punch a person thru a phone but this guy has changed that.
Right 🤔🤔
Yep!! I was yelling and cursing at him on my TV while watching the trial! And now want to do this on my phone while rewatching this!!!!
As MANY OF US WISH!
Free my boy
"Is that a 'tack it' agreement?"
Dense as a damned brick.
SuBstain. 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
I think the brick is smarter
@@GrannySmith123Grounzzzzz
I like your name. Hi, Granny🎉
That’s insulting to bricks; bricks are useful.
Man with no legal training has an epiphany on the toilet: "OMG I found the loophole every other person in history has missed"
I agree love your comment lol
How this judge does not go home at night and have vodka for dinner is beyond me. She needs a standing ovation for her patience.
maybe she does! I would!!
No doubt.
I have been drinking vodkas just by wathcing this.
would not blame her if she does lol
How do you know she doesn’t?
A narcissist will never know how truly foolish they look to the rest of the world.
Truth
Severely ignorant people are too severely ignorant not see their severe ignorance. I'm beginning to believe that the more Narcissistic a person is; the more ignorant they will be. Their ignorance is proportionate to their narcissism
Oh. They know.
They just don't care
@@domisthebomb09 THAT MAY BE A TRUTH
Great point. Brooks talking is the best example of his evil idiocy.
I watch these weeks later and just smile knowing none of his BS stopped that guilty verdict
Or a mistrial. This judge did absolutely amazing
ME TOO !!! 😮
Brooks: "Why can't I face my accuser"?
Judge: "Because, they are dead. The state is representing their families and estates".
And the severely injured
"The prosecution IS your accuser. They're sitting about 5 feet to your left. And your 6A rights are satisfied. That says you may confront the *witnesses* against you. Which you'll do when the State's counsel calls them."
It is so nice to see an obvious control freak not be allowed to be in control. Absolutely love it!
Textbook controlling abusive person
RIGHTTTTT! So satisfying
Yesssssss
He has the intellect of a rock who has watched too many crime shows on tv
Absolutely, that's why he's shaking and crying all the time. What a clownstick!
The fact that Judge Dorow doesn’t roll her eyes and yell, “That’s not how it works! That’s not how ANY of this works,” just proves she’s a saint.
Brooks legitly thought he was winning. Playing tic tac toe while everyone else was playing chess
I believe that DB knew full well what he was trying to do.
Irritate and exhaust the people (ladies) to mistrial.
This was NOT, NOT, NOT the convicted felon's first rodeo in the court system.
As much as he read off the paperwork of mumbojumbo he SHOULD have been able to memorize some of it.
Anyone else has issues with the fact he demanded to be "AWARDED" .
He did not have any business using the word.
Bless this poor woman…I hope she gets some rest now that this is over
@@emilywickler8871I think he was trying to get all of this on the record and get a mistrial or successful appeal later on.
@jbug1979 totally agree. One exception would be his 6 Amendment Right to face his accuser. Not his first time in the courtroom. He knew how the court system works regarding this.
Using the word "award " by him was so bad.
But he was awarded the well deserved prize of the sentenced handed to him.
When he claimed to not have seen documents, truth is he absolutely refused to accept any paperwork from anyone whatsoever.
He’s facing his accuser in the trial. His accusers are represented by the state and are either dead or the dozens of victims. There’s no way to face all those accusers so they’re represented by an entity
But he contradicts himself so much. He keeps stating that he is not Darrell Brooks nor does he know anyone by that name and even in this video he says the state is bringing the claim against his "client". Yet in the next breath says, "*I* should have the right to face my accuser". I wish judge would've been like... but you're not even Darrell Brooks, so it's not your accuser to face. 🤣🤣
Hi coming from England I have watched most of trail
When he was questioned by the FBI he was quite open to give them his name
And date of birth NOW he isn't that person who was driving the red SUV even the evidence is outstanding
He is denying everything
How can he face his accuser's / no named plaintiff 😂😂 definitely missing nut's and bolts
Springs and washers and definitely missing SMEGGING cog's
And also definitely Not on
SMEGGING Right page😠🤡
Exactly..the courtroom is full of his accusers.
As much trouble as he had been in he totally knew what was going on. Games for delay
Also the the 6th amendment is he has the right to face any WITNESSES. Not the accuser. It just basically means he has the right to cross examine and Judge Darrow say it in a round about way
My heart hurts for the victims who have to sit there and be questioned and ridiculed by this evil man. He obviously has no empathy or remorse for what he has done.
Is it just me that gets so angry when I hear his voice. I actually feel true hate for this man. I can’t help it. The things he has done deserve the death penalty. And sadly I’m the kind of person that would torture him before his last breath.
Yesssss it’s extremely SAD that his victims and there families have to to victimized by this EVIL MONSTER!! My heart is just breaking for ALL of them!! I can’t imagine being the families in that court room the judge and prosecution having to deal with this in REAL time!! He’s a demented goofy POS CLOWN!! Besides a murdering Evil monster 🤬
My heart doesn't. I wish the person who hurt my family had refused legal help and made a fool of themselves over and over in court, with the entire world watching.
This is a farce and shouldn't be allowed to happen! 😏
your heart hurts for people exercising their constitutional rights? that's weird...
This judge is probably the best mom on earth lol. Her level of patience is super human.
Yesss what a wonderful woman
@@jwill9237 💀???
Patience is important but there's other things that are also needed to make a great mom. I would say that if she were a mother, once she made a decision she wouldn't budge one inch no matter how much her child whined. Lol
Patience does not make you a good mom at all, LIKE AT ALLLLLL, and don't have an egoboost
Or she uses all her patience at work and is a terror at home haha.
Judge: “you can’t call up an entity to the stand.”
Defendant: *brain damage*
Unfortunately, this guy is getting off on the pain that he is putting everyone through by representing himself. He's on stage and loving it.
And he can love all 900 years in prison knowing that he did that while the rest of us move on with our lives 🙂
He is a sadist.
THIS IS A TRUE STATEMENT
So true. Everything he does is a performance. And he enjoys every minute of it.
Dude wants to subpoena Wisconsin. 😂 He wants the entire population of Wisconsin to face him in court. 🤣
Including himself 🤣🤣🤣
That *would* somewhat limit the jury pool.
I want him to face the entire population of Wisconsin, while running the Gauntlet!
Are you seriously that we Todd did?
Ahahahahahahahaahhaaha
By his train of thought, no one could ever be convicted of murder.
this one simple trick that murderers dont want you to know!
This really is such a good point, and it's just more proof of how this lunatic makes no sense at all.
@@bermchasin Prosecutor hate this man! Click here to learn more now!
Yeah they could, what he’s saying makes sense it just doesn’t help him. His accuser is the State of Wisconsin and the prosecution team is the representative of the State of Wisconsin. So he’s right, but he doesn’t realize he’s already facing the accuser
Edit: the 6th amendment gives you the right to face witnesses against you not your “accuser” so he’s wrong because he thinks his accuser would be the people who died and he’s double wrong because he thinks he has a right to face his accuser and then he’s triple wrong because he doesn’t realize his accuser is already in the room the prosecution
His train of thought? That train derailed and wrecked inutero
If the term “throw the books at him” was ever to be taken literally, this would be the case.
You do not know the definition of the word literally.
@@RiceDaddy07 I believe you don’t. They’re talking about the judge literally throwing a book at him.
Like a physical book. Thrown from somebody’s hand. Right?
@@MonoKrohm_2020 you're absolutely correct 👍🏽
This judge did such a good job dealing with this guy. She deserves a promotion.
Yes and No. You can't say I'll give you one chance and then spend the taxpayer's money arguing for another 30 minutes while she gave 10 more chances (throughout the duration of this trial) I expect he would have NOT gotten away with this crap with a male Judge. Be that as it may. I understand all the appellate issues, but this trial nonsense was crazy and a huge waste of taxpayer $$.
No she did not. The did not she took a Oath she is practicing law, Star of Wisconsin is his ho accuser
@@leximarie3808
It's not her fault... The law is he is allowed to represent himself... So they had to let this play itself out.
Good news, looks like she might very well be getting said promotion as she’s running for a newly open Wisconsin Supreme Court seat
She is running for the State Supreme Court at this moment. Hope u recv this info.
If he, (as he claims), is not Darrel Brooks, then how are his "rights being violated" by not being able to face his accuser? The man's thought processes are so distorted and ridiculous! I honestly cant wait for this to be over with and this man faces the consequences of his heinous actions.
I agree he keeps saying he is not Darrel Brooks and doesn’t know the person. He keeps provoking her and I admire her patience. Stand your ground judge I think your doing greet
You have just gotten to the main problem with SovCitiot arguments. They claim they only answer to god, yet the Bible says to obey the laws of the land. They claim they’re not subject to any US law, yet claim they have rights under the Constitution - disregarding the 10th Amendment in particular. They claim they’re a flesh & blood person, not a name, yet they occasionally answer to that name & that is the name their parents & family usually refer to them by & their parents gave them at birth. Darrell also specifically says at the start of each day something along the lines that he does not dispute the facts of the charges, yet he’s arguing that the charges do not apply to him & that he doesn’t understand the charges, because that comes into the 6th Amendment again. Their “logic” is so ridiculously f’d up it’s laughable. Except he’s making the trial harder for the victims & loved ones of the victims
He's a dufus is why!
These sovereign citizens use US Currency to buy gas, food and things but they don't want to obey the same laws of our government who prints US Currency.
Touché!
Does he not realize that the State represents every single person he killed or injured and he IS facing them and or their guardian.
Nope. He does not.
Yes he does. He's just playing his sovereign citizen script. Usually sovcits are using this nonsensical "strategy" to get out of traffic tickets, not murder charges.
It's been explained to him dozens of times, but somehow it's still "unclear" to him. He still acts like he doesn't know why he's in court!
No he doesn’t at all.
every single time he wants to say he has the right to face his accuser i’d ask him “would u like us to pull the coffins into this courtroom for u sir?”
My thoughts exactly
"I have a right to face my accuser"
"And the innocent people you killed had a right to enjoy the holiday parade without losing their lives sooo...."
Seriously he's got a lot of nerve. He really kills a bunch of people and hurts others and then starts making demands in the courtroom. I'm so glad he chose to represent himself cause I feel like that really helped solidify the jury's decision to charge him on over 70 counts. He needs to be taken out of society
exactly
@@BahamianKingGaming The most hated man on the planet right now
@@billturk183 he wishes 😂
@@billturk183 if Stalin, Hitler and Darrell were in the same room with me, and I had a pew pew with two freedom rounds I would dispense both of them at Darrell. Mostly because Hitler and Stalin are already unalive, but also because he’s the worst human being ever.
Fools rush in
by his argument you can murder someone and not be held accountable because the murdered person can’t face you
Exactly
True His accusers are all deceased😳
He also might be thinking he deserves to speak to the head of state or something, I dunno. Need to hold him in contempt
He’s wanting to subpoena the prosecutors (State) .. 😂
🔥🔥🔥 sad but true
The Sixth Amendment does not give the accused the right to "face his accuser." It gives the accused the right "to be confronted with the witnesses against him." In other words, it gives him the right to be present while the adverse witnesses testify against him and the right to cross-examine them in open court.
Exactly! He’s the one that doesn’t know the law. It’s so infuriating to listen to him!
Correct.
'the the assistance of counsel for his defence' the last words of the 6th Amendment. He should ahve taken advantage of that part!
Precisely. This is some classic sovereign citizen stuff--misconstrue the law and then pretend you've discovered a magical loophole.
He's getting, or has gotten, the usual really bad sovcit nonsense and hasn't really read the Constitution or any of the court rulings he claims support his claims. that's why the judge and prosecutor seem so baffled by his claims when he cites something to back them up. The judge and prosecutor looked up some supposed precedent he cited, and it was nonsense.
Once all the appeals are resolved, Sue Opper should write a book about this case. She could even share the proceeds with the community if she's so inclined
I'd read that
Sadly she’s retiring in 2024. I was very saddened by the news!!!
DA Opper should make it into an audiobook. As part of Brooks sentencing, he should be made to listen to it over and over.
@@trendywipp3715 Oh that would be sweet revenge/justice considering how much he hates her!!😈
This courtroom should have been set up like a studio with someone behind the scenes who could push a button for canned laughter for every time the fool Darrell Brooks spoke.
There are videos as you describe available on youtube.
I loved how the courtroom cracked up when the judge remarked on the delays and he said “but would it be fair to say that these delays are in no way my fault?” and the judge goes “…no, that would not be fair to say”
I love how the prosecutor is just letting him go on. Probably thinks this is the easiest case she's had all year.
No way, this is definitely the most frustrating month of her life. She’s having to work as the prosecutor and the defendant’s counsel to make sure he doesn’t get an appeal. All the while he objects every time a sentence is spoken. Hopefully they don’t just give him 1000 years, but make sure he serves it in the worst conditions legally allowed.
She's the Judge I believe the prosecutor is a man.
@@danielsholdingsllc5445 Offer is the woman prosecutor who spoke.
@@danielsholdingsllc5445 No, the woman who was speaking (besides the judge) is the District Attorney for Waukesha County, Susan Opper. She is the main prosecutor in this case. The other two lawyers are her assistants, Zach Wittchow and Lesli Boese.
He is also f-ing over any chance he would have on appeal
This is what happens when your defense is “there’s gotta be a loophole somewhere”. Just makes him look more guilty and no remorse.
There's a giant "loophole" in the middle of his brain. 😆
He is a disgusting sub human
No...look up Sovereign Citizens on RUclips...you'll soon understand where this lunacy comes from.
@@wildmustangart1577 I'm suprised darrell brooks found that ideology on his own. I wonder who is advising him...
@@User-1683x2 he does not consent to being referred to by that name. Lol
This woman is a national hero for being so patient as to give him zero grounds for an appeal. I think most other people, myself included, would have snapped a long time ago.
Oh yeah. My warnings would have been so forceful he would be crying. And only once no I’m asking you again.
YOU KILLED YOUR ACCUSER!!!!! Now the state speaks on their behalf
She has to be so careful because if she lets him get to her, she could mess up and give him some kind of advantage
exactly
She doesn’t need to care . He will become some other judges problem
Then he would take control, she is not having it
@@maddie48 you are exactly right!
she owns him every single time, i am sure he would like to kill her for that...
he shows his hate and his need to dominate not only to the jury, but also to the whole wide world of true crime lovers!
i have never seen a better example of a malignant narcissist loosing control in plain sight. it is hard to watch, but we are learning so much here!
He is a narcissist, who believes he is smarter than every lawyer in America. If it were this easy everyone would do it Darrell. I'm no friend of the justice system, but this judge is absolutely perfect for this case. She deserves national recognition.
The judge is right legally, but the law doesn't make sense.
@@auklaxer sure it does
no one answers for the state
legal precedent is set
@@ihatecrackhead precedent is a terrible reason to do anything.
Objection. This guy doesn’t know who Darrell is. Respectfully.
@@ihatecrackhead he is facing his accuser. The police, witnesses, and the prosecutor. There's no other way. Murder victims can't rep themselves.
He takes himself far too seriously for someone that nobody else takes seriously. 😂😂😂
This !!!! 👏🏽👏🏾
I LOVE the FACT that even though he did EVERYTHING ....ANYTHING he could on his own to stop or slow the process of this needed conviction, that it DID NOT work. None of it. What a laborious, tedious, traumatizing experience this must been for the people who had to sit in that court room, day in....day out... hours upon hours, watching, listening to this maniac disrespect this court consistently! What a nightmare.
There are days I don't look forward to work but I'm usually hopeful that I'll have a good day with minimal stress. I can not imagine everyone involved with that trial having to wake up every day and go into work knowing that it was going to be a miserable day because one individual had his heart set on dragging out the experience and driving everybody insane. This is like if you were working retail and you have that one crazy customer but instead of them leaving after 20 min in the store, they stay there for 8 hours and they'll be back every day for a month
Totally agree. This judge is legendary.
And those victims having to hear this every day. Judge Dorow is AMAZING!!!
No your Nightmare determination is your own. Don’t speak for others
@@elpllc7541 ...what is the point of your comment? I'm curious...
This guy is the literal embodiment of the phrase "talking just to hear himself talk"
I love it when he objects "Hearsay" when the statement is being given from an actual eyewitness! Lol
@@IdahoRanchGirl lmfao even after he's been given instructions on what "hearsay" means
@Daniel Linley I can't see in any way shape or form this man being freed.
@GameliEL Auceps Nah, he's a mass-murderer that was caught red-handed. He'll have all the time in the world to make his "solid legal point" to the fellow inmates once the trial is over.
👏👏
And throw away the key!! His antics are such a slap in the face to the victims!! He didn’t care when he plowed through that parade killing people and doesn’t care now. Worst kind of human on the face of the earth.
Allegedly; this is the USA he is innocent until proven guilty; no emotional rulings
Sad part is he screams sovereign citizen but wants the constitution rights of the United States applied to him . 🤡 who will be tormented in prison .
@@highlyfe600 🙏🏻 will be sweet when his well deserved karma arrives! And his looney-toon mother too!
I would much prefer an execution as the sentence.
@@Gang-gan oh come on everyone knows what he did. he's the furthest thing from innocent.
Kudos to the judge for not laughing at Mr Brooks
He does not deserve the any respect. he is no Mr
you could get in trouble for doing that, everybody holding their emotions.
Yasssssss
I don't think it would be difficult to rally the entire state to testify.
Agree see how he bullies and face them he’d be hung drawn and quartered
Yes!!
I am a schoolteacher. I deal with some maddening, ridiculous, entitled students, and have always thought I have the most frustrating job ever.
I was wrong.
Yours is still a tough gig, that’s for sure… but it’s thankfully rare to find a specimen as narcissistic, unreasonable and deviant as this one.
Depends on the demographics, I guess
@@LordMarps I've met a few 4th graders who are headed in that direction. But-actually-I was inspired by Judge Dorrow. She exercised amazing decorum and restraint.
@@melissasw64 Agreed - it came across as more of a parent-toddler relationship at times in there. She handled a man-child in the best way possible.
I'm currently studying to become one, do you have any tips on how to handle that? And what about the parents that take out their frustration on the teachers because their kid didn't do well in an exam?
How the judge keeps her composure with this absolute tool is admirable 😳 Just because he can read, he believes he's intelligent & it's so painful to watch 😖
you realize that's a paramount requirement of a judge, right? Patience and discretion...
@@unknownalien3837 err, I think so 🤔
@@unknownalien3837 That may be a paramount requirement to be a judge but there are loads and loads of videos and documents of judges not only not keeping their composer, but some became physically violent towards lawyers, swear at jurors during selection, or sneak documents to prosecutors. So yes, holding your composer should be a requirement, but that doesn’t mean we don’t all snap at some point. She’s an amazing judge to deal with him.
@@rerelux6311 If there are loads of judges like that in America, then that's scary. It's weird how everyone is praising her for the bare minimum.
@@slickrick2420 Bare Minimum? She’s keeping her composure and listening to a murderer rant and rave on and on so that she doesn’t infringe on his rights. She’s stopped the trial more times than I’ve ever seen any judge do, to handle him and his tantrums. She’s been called names, insulted, and fully disrespected. He ran over dozens of people, killing 6, and hospitalizing so many more. The fact that he had rights at all is astounding to me. Anyone siding with a man who couldn’t care less about the lives he destroyed, is not someone I’d care to talk with again so that seems to include you so I wish you the best. Bye ✌️
How can you face your accuser if they are dead? You killed them.
*Quick Summary*
Judge: _Remember, there are 12 jurors deciding your fate._
Darrel: _Objection your honor! You said a dozen yesterday. So, what? Your honor can’t just change the amount of jurors!_
😅🤣😂😅🤣😂👍👍👍
@@JanNan haha thanks your laugh made me smile
Hahaha
Wish the judge could say “I have explained it to you. I cannot understand it for you.”
hehe , good one.
THAT would be perfect.
Well you know it’s not his fault, she just didn’t explain it in 3rd grader words. She needs to say “You did a bad thing Darrell, go sit in the corner until I say you can leave… which is never.“ 😂 He’s a literal man child.
Ohhhh I like that. I'm gonna use it every chance I get 🤣
@Domo haha so true
Yeah, and when I was a kid I said, "Kathy, the entity known as 'mom' has sent me to my room, but I'm unaware of anyone named 'mom.'"
I spent the rest of the week in my room.
and Darrell Brooks will spend the rest of his life in prison where he belongs.
🤣
🤣🤣🤣 good one! Did you grow up and go to law school lol 😆
Noted for the record. 😅
🤣🤣
Every time the jury gets ready to enter the room he raises bs so the jury can hear it.
Imagine thinking you could outsmart the whole legal system of a state without spending a single day in law school. Next thing he'll think not consenting to something is legal grounds for it not to happen.
Look up the dunning-kruger effect, it will make more sense.
This judge is the most patient person I’ve ever seen. She addressed every single one of his questions at least ten times each day. Get a lawyer Brooks!!!!
There's constitutional right in this country.
maybe you haven't been following - he had one and elected to represent himself, as is his constitutional right.
@@butchfils9464 right to what?
It's his mother we must applaud!
@GameliEL Auceps who's point? what are you referring to exactly?
"Since all the people I killed are dead, there is no one alive to accuse me. Mistrial. "
Well there are the 60 that he injured also, and the state of Wisconsin represents them too
@@tranquility9325 Is that lawful law?
@@JohnSmiffer Grounds.
This Judge (I think) was chosen especially for her patience to "deal" with this person" :)
love how he said "im not able to face my accuser" and in the same breath "on behalf of my client" ...wish the judge would have called him out on that
Hes so above everyone else that he is himself and hovering above himself as well. Dont question greatness! 😅
Joe's right. Since he's his own client, he wasn't inconsistent when he said those 2 sentences.
@@morninglift1253 cool
Pack the bowl please.
I caught that
This judge has to have 14 toddlers at home to have this level of patience!
🤣
Nothing but respect for this judge she is so professional and not losing her mind with this person
Someone should dress up in a state of WI costume and testify 😂😂😂
I just got that mebtal image in my head lol
Indeed. They can then take the stand merely to advise Brooks, while in full costume, that the 6th amendment doesn’t say he had the right to face his accuser. It says he has the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him and to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favour.
The problem is the dress code unfortunately..
🤣🤣🤣
Have a Packers fan come in with one of those big foam cheese hats as 'the state of Wisconsin'. Then just have him repeat everything DB asks him, like a parrot!😆
The judge deserves sainthood for calmly putting up with this behavior.
Someone is looking for grounds for a Supreme Court hearing application?
He proffers concepts that seemingly are beyond the understanding of a normal person.
Who from the Sovereign Citizen World is briefing him?
Shea not meant to be emotionally involved. Just handle the proceedings.
nope...she should be removed from the bench for allowing this ridiculous circus
"sainthood" = child molesterhood. try again. she has patience. enough said.
@@JB-js4xi Most judges find the defendants out of order but can do nothing about their ridiculous claims. Brooks need to be held in contempt and thrown in jail until he complies with the court.
His line of arguments really just proves he has zero remorse
Geez, this person really thinks he’s going to say the right combination of magical words to absolve himself. No chance buddy.
The most patient judge ever
His confusion is hilarious. "Bring the state in here I want to question the trees." 😆
@@Stoshnut objection! grounds? I object to not being able to talk to the ground
🤣🤣🤣
9:17-I do not even understand the true nature and cause of the charges...HIRE A LAWYER! lol
Right? Not their fault that he decided to represent himself 🤷♀️
That is a classic bs statement every one of these supposed, pathetic sovereign citizens say. He's being disingenuous. They all have the same 5 statements they say over and over again.
He quoted the 6th Amendment the whole trial. Badly, most of the time. Granted, I didn’t know how to answer most of those questions myself at first. Nit the Prosecution and the judge should have quoted the sixth amendment right back to him. Because The sixth amendment doesn’t say “face your accuser,” (or plaintiff). It says “confront witnesses against you.”
Since he is following the sovereign citizen ideology he believes the term understand meaning if he stands under the government’s authority. Which I believe he is doing
@@DaniHGirl
And then he blamed the judge for allowing him to represent himself...
He's a complete hypocrite.😔
Once he's finally put away the "Guards " will turn a deaf ear and blind eye when he's screaming for help .
Contempt of court. She already explained this to him multiple times last week. Waste of taxpayer money and time.
Contempt may prolong the trial
Not unless contempt charges are added AFTER the verdict. Compounding his problems... each contempt charge carries up to 364 days in county... give him 6 life sentences without parole PLUS 6 years in county.
I wonder what consequence he'd face if he was held in contempt? Usually the people found in contempt get sent to jail, where is already is. And if found guilty of all his charges, he's never going to be out of custody ever.
"Your request is denied", lol. This guy sits in his jail cell trying to find ways to get around being held accountable for his actions instead of actually trying to defend himself.
God help his appeals attorney, I'd quit if his case came to my desk
I seriously doubt that an appeal will be granted. There are no grounds for an appeal.
@@michellesayers5346 he has no constitutional right to represent himself on appeal, which is why he's reaching out to the public defender's office
@Miles Dufourny his case will be dismissed eventually but, unfortunately, this takes months. There is nothing his attorney can cite that would require the judgment to be reversed
well there was issues of the subject matter jurisdiction @@milesdufourny4813
I've seen other courts/judges who have been forced to use duct tape, I would have loved to see it used here, possibly on more than 1 day. 🥰
While judges have a right to do this....recently a judge was just fired for doing just this thing and the defendant got a new trial
This monster's sense of entitlement is astounding to me. No remourse or regret. I'm sure he had that same sense of entitlement when he plowed through the parade. He had the right to be on that road and everyone else needed to get out of his way. He won't do well in prison where he will be spending the rest of his days.
I'm waiting for this fiasco to be done with so we can get on to the jury getting this case! I'll bet it takes them a half of a day to find him guilty on all charges. When he's back in orange and shackled, he's going to cry like a baby screaming his rights have been violated!!
@Lori Baker careful assuming that, the jury could be swayed by their own manufactured sense of guilt.
he honked his horn though?
Yes and most of the commenters are calling him a narcissistic. In my studies. He could be a pyscopath. Just my opinion
Sandy Hook boy is the monster. Brooks didnot shoot 25 children
The nerve of him to say "living, breathing human being" that's low
You would think that before you decide to represent yourself in a trial, you would know the difference between a criminal case and a civil case.
He keeps saying our client as if he’s representing someone else and he’s a lawyer 😂😂😂
She is doing her job so well.. she realizes he’s doing anything and everything to try to lay the grounds for a mistrial or appeal, and she is covering every base at every turn… All while remaining calm and professional. I find it extremely impressive lol I truly do not know where she finds the patience to deal with this CLOWN for HOURS every day. I’d go absolutely insane.
whats really sad is
she shouldnt fkng have to. it just frosts me.
she is finding the courage and patience from knowing she has to do right by those that perished in this event....she is doing it for them.
Exactly
@@Gotz2bril exactly
I’ve gone insane after 5 min it’s SO HARD to watch this trial
It's almost over. He will be behind the walls forever. RIP to the victims.
"Is that a judicial decision" I'm gonna ask my girlfriend this anytime she tells me what to do😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
If this dude has anything, it's the audacity...
Absolutely
This is the guy who will stare at an orange juice container for hours because it says concentrate on it.
😂😂
Hahahaha 😆 😂
Funny
🤣😂🤣
Sovereign citizen but wants all his rights
He knows what he’s doing he’s not slow!! He’s not getting out! Even after his appeals etc. He in fact KILLED HIS PLAINTIFFS and injured the others.. So why isn’t they saying this to him?? Her acting like he’s innocent! Why not say you’re sorry and you didn’t mean to do it and please show mercy on him!! I’m confused what’s wrong with him! He is so argumentative and that’s a shame
He DOES have a right to face (and examine) ANY accuser. Several accusers have come forward, each saying (paraphrased) "With my own eyes, I saw that man drive in a dangerous fashion causing harm to me and/or others, and so I accuse him of crimes." The state is _prosecuting_ not accusing. The state provides people to effect the prosecution based on the statements and exhibits provided by those accusers.
As such, the defendant has the right to face (and examine) each of those accusers. Done.
[EDIT: Even better, the Sixth Amendment does NOT grant "the right face accusers." The actual right is "to be confronted with the _witnesses_ against him." Even if he were to interpret the act of prosecution as "accusing him," his actual right is to be confronted with those _witnesses_ in court.
Thank you- very well said
Darrell Brooks is actually crazier than Alex Jones. 😆
Even in your example, isnt the accuser really just a witness? In a murder case the would-be accusers are dead
He doesn’t have rights tho he’s a sovereign citizen 😮
It’s why she told him to reread that amendment and go over the book several times. Even called him out for misrepresenting the law. She could cause a devastating major blow to his ego by pointing out the very things you just said, but knows she has to watch where she steps with this fool.
He is a narcissist through and through, and I think it's begun to hit him just how screwed he is, which is why we're seeing him grasp at increasingly dubious straws to try and delay the proceedings. Great job by this judge at shutting him down.
I believe you're right. He's going to ramp up the antics over the next few days, and will likely have a full blown meltdown in an attempt to force a mistrial.
I don’t think he is grasping so much as blindly following a Sovereign Citizen script he found on the Internet somewhere, or someone is feeding him this ideology.
I hope you’re right. He needs to worry…
@@deborahmcmindes6812 after this testimony by one of the dancing grannies? This guy better say his goodbyes to his family, because this was it. The trial is over now.
Does Wisconsin have the death penalty? 🙏
Isn't the State of Wisconsin there for the injured parties?
Can we all just take a moment of silence for his future prison cell mate 😱
Wish it would be Chris Watts! Another pos.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This guy is the perfect example for why we cannot be lenient with sovereign citizens.
What’s a “sovereign citizen”?
It is not his claim to be a sovereign that is dangerous because that is just another one of his manipulations.
It is his psychopathic behavior that is dangerous
@@Phah-Queue Google it or look it up on RUclips. You'll quickly see what I mean. They believe they aren't subject to any laws other than "God's" laws which can obviously be interpreted any way they choose. Sometimes they simply use it as an excuse to drive without a license, insurance, etc but other times they take it much further. Some are mentally ill, others just don't have the mental capacity to understand what they're doing wrong.
Why he is hanging himself...
@@gwens5093 He's doing EXACTLY what sovereign citizens do. This isn't the only example. There are many. He doesn't need to say he's a sovereign citizen because it's extremely obvious just like he doesn't have to say he's a man for us to realize he isn't a woman lol.
Brooks is such a dynamo defense attorney. Wow.
Got his law degree through marvel comic books
Don't insult Comic lawyers like that...(;
@Tank 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Oh puhlease! Think of the man who crossed examined his own kid. Also, how does the parkand shooter get many more opportunities than this guy?
Actually he got his degree from one of those advertisements in the back of older comic books.
@Tank Grounds!!!???
When he says "I have the right to face my accuser" he's admitting he is Darrell Brooks, and that he is the guy who's charged with the crime.
Not "my client" as he states earlier.
BEAUTIFULLY HANDLED JUDGE
She's gonna sentence him harder than she'd sentenced anyone in her life
Yes he will get at least 6 life terms!
Yes I believe so as well. I think she is gonna sentence him to the maximum possible CONSECUTIVELY!
I don’t mean to sound cruel but how cool would it be if they just threw him in solitary the whole time.
Good hit him hard
and love every minute of it
He knows what he’s doing, His goal is to do just what she’s allowing him to do which is DELAY
He sounds like he's trying every dialog option in a lawyer video game.
Yep that's it
She has the patience of a saint.
Is it patience or letting him go on and on so any appeal's court will not want to touch it with a 10 foot pole?
exactly, rack391
Ted Bundy stood a better chance of getting out from defending him self then this dude ever will
His lawyer would of told him to shut up so many times this case would of taken 2 days tops.
I hope there is a live stream of his prison life.
Master class on proving one's guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt, just by speaking enough to show everyone who you are and how you think.
Darrell Brooks, the "legal scholar", is unaware that it is "illegal" to: 1) Run his girlfriend over with a car, and 2) Run over a large group of people with his car.
Excellently written
Couldn't agree more!
Just imagine being this judge 😳
She must have the peace of God in her heart. No one else could do it.
I hope she has a very supportive family at home & whichever child/children have taught her how to deal so well with this sulky toddler in a suit, are being little angels while this case is going on. And hopefully her family includes furry people who give her loads of unconditional love, cuddles & relaxation time, while the humans ply her with hot baths, wine, yummy food, massages & comfy beds to recover from the stress of dealing with this horrific case made so much worse by Darrell’s ridiculous antics
She’s a saint…I would have blew up at him 1000 times by now!
Imagine being his ex gf😬
She stronger then me cause I woulda lost my job b slapping a hooooooo 👋
Thousands of prisoners are slapping thier heads and saying why didn't we think of that?
If that's the case and he expects the State of Wisconsin to show up...Then the State of Wisconsin should call HIS CLIENT, DARRELL E BROOKS