Thanks to Squarespace for sponsoring this video! Head to squarespace.com/thrillseeker to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code thrillseeker at checkout. THE XR4 HAS ARRIVED.. AND ITS FREAKIN' GOOD. What do ya think? Willing to rip out a kidney to get one? I'm unsure especially with Vision Pro coming up.
2:40 Virtual Desktop is a hard pass for me. All these years later, I basically have two options. Let VD display 1920x1080 on my desktop (which is 5120x1440, so the image is unusably stretched in passthrough) OR I can flip the option to fit my 5120x1440 monitor into a 1920x1080 letterbox. Giving me an amazing resolution of... *_1920_* x _*520*_. also unusable. This is the same issue I had with the old ultrawide several years ago, which was "only" 3840x1080... "Showing Meta and Valve How To Do It"... Pft. QuestLink, Airlink, and SteamVR have *always* shown my desktop at the appropriate 1:1 scale.
well... I will have a closer look at Bigscreen Beyond headset... already very expensive ... at least for me ... but I love the idea to make headsets smaller and easier to wear. XR4 for sure is a great great headset for VR enthusiast .. like you? :) but way toooo expensive for normal Vr market and yeah... again "big" and far away from the great idea behind bigscreen beyond making a small wearable headset with great specs too
People may look at these hyper expensive headsets and think “ok cool but i can’t afford that right now” and that’s just the thing. The tech in those headsets may be expensive now, but they’re a glimpse into the future of what VR can bring as that tech trickles its way down into cheaper headsets as tech innovation always does. In this current moment, VR tech is the worst it’s ever going to be, and that’s especially exciting. The future holds a world of possibility for VR.
The VR-3 was the epitome of VR headsets in 2020, and it cost $3,195. Three years later, the Aero, which is just flat out *better* as well as easier to use than the VR-3, goes on sale for $890? If the trend continues, the XR-4 is $3,995 right now. In late 2026, the successor to the aero should be better than the XR-4, easier to use than the XR-4, and go on sale for $1,090 down from $1,190! I know things don’t pan out linearly like that usually, but it gives a ballpark of where things could be! Also by then, Meta will probably be releasing the Quest 4 (likely that year even), which *will* be a competitor to that despite likely being priced substantially lower just due to how well of an all rounder it will be.
The thing is, even the quest 2 gave me some neck issues. I'd be willing to give up a lot of fidelity for more bigscreen size headsets - this one is completely unappealing to me.
i just don't want VRChat to turn into roblox, incessantly begging and pestering you to buy shit, and adding paywalls like you said, its exactly what i didn't want to happen
If I were a frequent user of VRchat I'd hope for paid worlds that are child restricted. Then maybe I'd use it more. Nothing more annoying than exploring different worlds and seeing just how many squeakers end up wannabe JoshDubs enthusiasts.
@@cenciende9401 While that's true its also true that people is greedy and wanna turn everything into money making to the point things start to get bad or even predatory.
I think having a free wireless option for PC VR will make it easier for people to make drivers for things like face or hand tracking. Hopefully making it more accessible to everyone.
@@0skuro they already use a bunch of valve patent, I don't see valve wanting to safeguard specifically the controller, pretty sure they will be pretty happy to sell a license for it
@VioFax yeah, it's one of the reasons I kinda feel like not learning blender. For all we know next year they'll make a ai that can just make a world at the rate it's going by just typing in what you want.
I dislike the VRChat monetization. Don't get me wrong, I like the fact it's gonna be easier for creators to get paid, but I hate the implementation. It uses coins, which are designed like coins in pay-to-win mobile games. They're made so it's hard to judge how much something costs. You can also only buy them in packs, meaning you'll likely have some leftover after a purchase, meaning you'll want to buy more so they don't go to waste. Even if you can cash out a single coin, doing so makes you lose half it's value, thanks to the 50% cut. I know VRChat unfortunately can't get around the 50% cut, but they didn't have to make the value weird, they could've made 1 coin $0.01 USD, and they could've made it so you could buy individual coins! It just feels so scummy IMO, and I can this becoming another Roblox situation, since those exact concerns are issues people have with Robux.
Glad to see Varjo coming out with a banger headset. Of all the headset makers, they were the ones poised to compete directly with Apple's Vision Pro. And considering the amount and quality of product Apple can turn out, they were in a somewhat dire position. It's nice seeing them still able to push hardware boundaries and make it more accessible. Now all we need is an Aero 2.
@@MaddTheSane Also apple is such a large company it has more resources and VR apps will be much more mainstreamed on the Apple headset. It's about to get interesting.
Sony & Meta are the only leaders in this industry, nobody is selling more then 1 million headsets. Sony is currently the leader technically, since Quest hasn't sold 600,000 units, and Sony is likely far past 1 million sales by now.
I'm not that amped about vrc's monetization effort; I feel like a monetary incentive, especially given their in-game currency model, is going to attract people seeking the money. Modern examples don't really leave me with much hope for this model.
Yea I just hope there wont be any pay walls to enter worlds(which is gonna happend 100%) or where you get barebones version of the world where you have to pay to actually play the intended experience of the world
That's a good thing. Want lots of really good content, money needs to be involved, behind all content are human beings with limited time who have lives to live
Also even if we don't get paywall worlds, or paywalled content, thrill said in the video that VRC creators get paid in vrc's proprietary currency. Roblox has the same issue where even if they get 50% of the revenue, it has an insane markup to turn that Monopoly money back into real money
@@pewdspersonaldronefromthef5546 It's not greed is good, it's people are going to be able to put in more effort to their work if that work also pays the bills
I'm hoping the vr chat pay thing is more like a donation jar that's optional, and used sparingly maybe for some extra avatars. Idk, this could easily go horrible or well. 😅 I know if I could make money making a world, that would definitely motivate me to learn to make a world finally lol.
Valve has a history of making software open source after they believe that it's fully developed and finished for their intended purpose or goal, so it may be the same case here
Also, I think they weighed the value of making it open source vs. actually having a closed product that is in the Meta market with so much more reach to mainstream. I can see why they would have chosen the latter. I also, really hope, this is indicator of more VR software from Valve...like H-L 3 ahah.
In regards to the VRC changes, I just hope the map creators don't get too greedy, I don't think all of them will but some will likely get carried away I imagine. I'm glad it's here but I'm just cautiously optimistic.
It's wild how the Vision Pro has suddenly made $4000 sound like an actually reasonable price. The Apple effect is real Edit: to clarify, I don't necessarily think this is a bad thing. It's just wild how much it changes the public's (and my own) perception of the cost.
Actually, Apple is pushing the prices down. The XR-3 costs $7000 plus a subscription, needs stations for tracking and isn't a standalone device. The Vision offers higher resolution and eye-tracking navigation that is yet to be seen in the industry. And now Varjo launches the XR-4 cutting almost half the price with no subscription.
I remember my first experience with actual vr. It was a while ago at gadget show live, and we were walking around the convention area. One of the booths had vr rings to try where you held onto a guard rail, wore some special shoes, and you could walk around a famous painting. The shoes had no grip so you literally couldnt stand with them, but against being told not to, i let go of the ring to try and… tried to grab something that wasnt really there. I smacked my head on the rail and everyone was trying to make sure I was okay, but I was just fascinated by the idea of a world that didnt really exist
I think it's kinda funny how the VRChat credits now make it even more like the Oasis than it was before. Obviously the Oasis was more of an MMORPG that turned into a MMORPG hybrid with social experiences and productivity in addition to other things, but VRChat is really close to that now and it's sort of insane and cool.
Is it? Or is it exactly expected, predicted trajectory. I think Rift was more incredible, because it really made viable, consumer VR a reality, the rest is normal tech advancement. I think the lucky part that Zuckerberg got obsessed over it and put sooo much money behind it.
Yeah I'm still rocking the CV1 and just can't convince myself to upgrade yet. Thinking of maybe trying the quest 3 but still not totally convinced it's worth the upgrade
@milannesic5718 that's fine. The consumer market has only really just started to take off. We started at NES and are now at PS5 and that only took like 3 decades. The quest 3 in standalone mode is fairly strong for what it is, nearly surpassing the xbox 360 in quality after only 3 years after the quest 2. All the QoL gripes (FoV, optic stacks, and power draw) get fixed over time.
I think adding monitization to vrchat will be a bsd thing. The game is already plauged by shady characters and half assed strip clubs. Adding real money directly into the game i believe will worsen these issues and create new ones like, paywalling features that have no reason to be paywalled, pollarize communities by those who donated and those who havent, and scams.
already an issue you know. patreon paywalls. what this will do is just make it more mainstream. low effort cash grabs are going to be more common. lets just hope 1 or 2 good things come out amongst the wave of shit
Just got word that it only has DP1.4, so it's restricted to 30PPD unless the game specifically implements Varjos SDK (which is currently zero games). So the Aero actually has higher PPD for consumer use cases, albeit lower FOV. Really a headscratcher that they went with DP1.4.
Yeah still 1.4. I asked them about it and apparently hey did some interesting stuff to stay right under the bandwidth with the eye tracking. The PPD on the pupil gaze is still 51PPD (according to them) with drastic fall off outside of the focus range.
@@ThrillSeekerVR That's true but only with SDK implementation so unfortunately for the consumer experience of Steam VR gaming, we will be stuck st 30PPD (lower than Aero due to the larger FOV). It will still be amazing but much less appealing for the mad cost but does make the Aero still an appealing purchase at a good price now (although come on... Bigscreen beyond is what you'd really go for now haha).
For the creator economy, sure the creators may get 50% of the split, but Gumroad only takes 10% of what avatar and world creators make, not to mention Patreon takes 25 cents on direct deposit payout and 1% payout fee for PayPal on top of an at most a 12% cut for membership fees. Sure, it's nice for people to support their favorite creators in game, however, the creators earn more still through outside platforms. Hell, I think some creators even just have a donation thing so they get 100% of donations anyways, so thinking about it from a purely monetary perspective, it makes sense to support creators through the means by which we are already doing so. VRChat wants to capitalize off of how convenient it will be paying for in-game subscriptions.
I honestly think that the XR4 is the biggest slap in Apple's face. Vario just looked at Apple and said "what do you got on us." I honestly think the selling point for this thing should be that it costs about as much as what Apple wants for their vision pro headset but is like 10 times better
Not to mention Quest 3 is 7x cheaper and has the largest VR gaming ecosystem period and does a lot of similar things with improved MR over Q2, leaving people wondering who Vision Pro is even targeting at this point. Sandwiched in-between.
thats nothing new. apple has always made weaker hardware thats priced higher. they excell at everything else. software and marketting. Thats why the iphone is so successful despite compettitors having better and cheaper hardware. its only till a few years ago that apple actually has decent hardware in their stuff. the thing you forgot though is the apple headset is standalone. its made to be used standalone.
@@TayoEXEyeah gee I wonder if that much cheaper gaming device is meant to compete with an incredibly high end and unique headset, it’s definitely not like they were different markets.
Yep I'm planning to use the quest 3 to finally be able to work on my patent properly. I can't draw for shit which means I can't properly show how it works despite having my proof of concept but with the 3D art apps in the quest 3 I can finally do that. I only wish I'd gotten it months ago but I didn't realize it was an option. The hell I probably could do it with the quest 2 but I was wholy uninterested in virtual reality. I just didn't realize that it was for more than just gaming at the time I didn't think they'd come that far.
Some of us are waiting with VERY deep pockets for the perfect VR system to get into. I have dropped $5,000+ for a laptop, so this is not much different. I want something so awesome, I could slip into a VR delusion and escape reality for the remainder of my retirement years.
@@Sarevok_Wins I see a couple bits of hardware I could use, but it is not available yet for the consumer market. Looks like the RTX 5000 series will be out (or at least announced) around the end of the year too.
@@Sight-Beyond-Sight I think I'll be rebuilding my setup once the 50 series drops, but I'm just looking for a nice VR set without the damns screen door effect.
@@Sarevok_Wins That is part of my problem too. My desktop is a 2nd gen i7. The 14900KS looks JUICY and dumping in some 192GB of DDR5 5600 MHz (CPU limit) would fill the need nicely. I want to get it all at once so I have something worthy of pushing the latest and greatest. Also looking at the Virtuix Omni One omni-directional treadmill to go with.
VRC is becoming the metaverse Zucc wanted. Living and working in VR just became a lot more real and honestly, I can't wait to see what the change brings to VRC
I worry it will bring paywalled worlds, and bad conversion rates to creators from VRC's proprietary currency back into real money. I think this was certainly a decision that was made by the upper echelon of VRC, and I fully believe this will be bad for the community.
XR4 is not as good as you say. To have reviewed it for one month at work, I only agree with your VR feedbacks. MR is not their yet, I would prefer Quest 3 smoothness than XR4 really clear but only in controlled environment and with zero movement. And hell what a poor ergonomic!
Tbh I’m kinda hoping the new creator monetization program for VRC will turn out well for everyone! I’m curious to see how it will be used going forward:O
Hey Thrill. Will you talk about Resonite, the spiritual successor to Neos by the same dev team, but without the crypto? I feel like it needs more atention, make people aware of it.
I have been RAVING about variable focus for years and it is literally the *only* feature I’ve genuinely really wanted from a new VR headset since the technology was announced by oculus like six years ago! I am so insanely happy that this is coming out and that it’s going to come down in price soon! I’ve been saying that people keep wishlisting things like increased resolution, wider fov, lighter weight, better audio, etc, but almost none of it matters compared to the ability to focus on objects and use your eyes normally! This is the missing link between Virtual Reality and Reality Reality!
@@Nobody-Nowhere I know, but at least it’s a step in the right direction-having that feature available for any part of a headset immediately improves it in my book beyond all headsets that don’t have it at all
I for one am really stoked about the VR Chat monetization because it means it could finally be the thing that drives ARTISTS onto the platform. I mean its not hard to imagine maybe some very famous DJs might see this as motivation to do virtual concerts in VR Chat where you need to pay 5 or 10 bucks to attend. I don't think it's unreasonable at all if it brings out famous artists that normally wouldn't care.
Yeah that surprised me as well. After using it I considered for a brief moment saving to get one until I saw the price. 4k is one thing. 10k is a whole different ball park.
The Varjo is really interesting but it will still probably be obliterated in sales and quality by the Vision Pro. The Vision is cheaper, it got a small footprint, it does not look like an Oculus VR1, and it has m-OLED screens. Software wise, nothing really beats Apple, and it will integrate so well within the ecosystem that it’s a no brainer for those companies. You cannot compete against Apple if you are not a GAFAM. And even if you are, like Facebook, it’s still a task in its own right. But I’d argue it’s not really what Varjo was going for anyway. If they were at an military convention, it’s because you do not give a 3.5k glass headset to a soldier for training. They saw the Apple headset, they HAD to lower the price for most people, at this point, it’s probably be staying a niche product within a niche sector, even if the Vision lineup democratize Spatial computing headsets.
I'm literally holding off on buying my next vr headset, waiting for a wider FOV headset with modern specs. The pimax 12k, set to launch AFTER the crystal seems like a decent contender, but VR headsets keep dropping with index-like FOV. Why can't we have bigger FOV headsets?
I have an 8kx, I debated getting the Beyond, but the FOV wasn't there. I've tried most VR products by way of my flight school, heaps of students have their own sim set ups and being them in from time to time. The 8kx still stands out all these years later. Let's hope the 12k addresses all our needs, idc if it requires a beastly PC to run it, it has to be ABLE to do it.
4000 is too much, so i am waiting for Pico 5 Pro. This one should have full face tracking. And i hope VRChat is not too much pay-walled, also i hope creators are not going too far to buy for some silly effects. I build worlds too, so i know almost exact what is needed to make it work. I hope everything stays friendly and open.
Kinda sad for VRC. The most fun I had was just world hoping and having to pay for most would make it untenable. Especially if like me you are in a country where the money is very weak vs USD. You end up paying double or more for the same...
Great another prosummer++++ vr headset. The number of times I said this in the past 2 years, this getting ridiculous. These kind of products are slowing vr adoption way back. Ultra high tech without proper software integration is WORTHLESS.
Subscriptions and the inevitable (imo) ability to tip people like musicians and dancers directly is a great thing overall but def gonna be a mixed bag. I’m not looking forward to the explosion of fake musicians using RUclips videos making a comeback.
The hype is real, and so is the expense! Only private industry and popular RUclipsrs need apply. Huge gap now between low end VR and high end. Hope that changes soon
Thanks to Squarespace for sponsoring this video! Head to squarespace.com/thrillseeker to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code thrillseeker at checkout.
THE XR4 HAS ARRIVED.. AND ITS FREAKIN' GOOD. What do ya think? Willing to rip out a kidney to get one? I'm unsure especially with Vision Pro coming up.
2:40 Virtual Desktop is a hard pass for me. All these years later, I basically have two options. Let VD display 1920x1080 on my desktop (which is 5120x1440, so the image is unusably stretched in passthrough) OR I can flip the option to fit my 5120x1440 monitor into a 1920x1080 letterbox. Giving me an amazing resolution of... *_1920_* x _*520*_. also unusable.
This is the same issue I had with the old ultrawide several years ago, which was "only" 3840x1080...
"Showing Meta and Valve How To Do It"... Pft. QuestLink, Airlink, and SteamVR have *always* shown my desktop at the appropriate 1:1 scale.
I tried it just yesterday before your video came out... The problem is SquareSpace is So paid and expensive for normal people!
LMAO😂😂2024💪WE REFINANCING KIDNEYS🥴🥴🤣🤟
well... I will have a closer look at Bigscreen Beyond headset... already very expensive ... at least for me ... but I love the idea to make headsets smaller and easier to wear. XR4 for sure is a great great headset for VR enthusiast .. like you? :) but way toooo expensive for normal Vr market and yeah... again "big" and far away from the great idea behind bigscreen beyond making a small wearable headset with great specs too
So pumped for SteamLink
People may look at these hyper expensive headsets and think “ok cool but i can’t afford that right now” and that’s just the thing. The tech in those headsets may be expensive now, but they’re a glimpse into the future of what VR can bring as that tech trickles its way down into cheaper headsets as tech innovation always does. In this current moment, VR tech is the worst it’s ever going to be, and that’s especially exciting. The future holds a world of possibility for VR.
For now, I can only wait for the hand tracking and other full body technologies to trickle down
@@Aeretofull body already kinda has, I mean look at slime vr, only thing with them right now is they aren't able to ship out until next year
@@RedLotus102
They are dealing with the FCC which resulted in US shipments being on the backlog.
The VR-3 was the epitome of VR headsets in 2020, and it cost $3,195. Three years later, the Aero, which is just flat out *better* as well as easier to use than the VR-3, goes on sale for $890? If the trend continues, the XR-4 is $3,995 right now. In late 2026, the successor to the aero should be better than the XR-4, easier to use than the XR-4, and go on sale for $1,090 down from $1,190! I know things don’t pan out linearly like that usually, but it gives a ballpark of where things could be! Also by then, Meta will probably be releasing the Quest 4 (likely that year even), which *will* be a competitor to that despite likely being priced substantially lower just due to how well of an all rounder it will be.
quest 4 will likely be closer to a bigscreen beyond competitor, and bigscreen can drop to like $700
@@cannedolives
You forgot the most important part! THEY ADDED A CLOCK TO VRCHAT
!!!!!!!!!!!! CAN YOU BELIEVE IT
So true. I was shocked when I logged in.
WHERE IS THE MEME BREAK?!
It's not a Tuesday Newsday unless it's not on a Tuesday
true, but he said "friday newsday" near the beginning
the wording "selling yet another kidney" suggests that the kidneys are not his
The thing is, even the quest 2 gave me some neck issues. I'd be willing to give up a lot of fidelity for more bigscreen size headsets - this one is completely unappealing to me.
cervical radiculopathy is no joke
Actual exciting VR news are back❤
Steamlink really didn't work at all for me, I went straight back to Virtual Desktop.
floor gang
floor gang
floor gang!!!!!!!!
Only 12 likes???
Now 13
VRChat creators are gonna need to be a whole lot more aware of what assets they're using from now on if they want to monetize them.
big bingo
Some case is probably gonna have to get pretty ugly before people start realizing licences exist.
i just don't want VRChat to turn into roblox, incessantly begging and pestering you to buy shit, and adding paywalls like you said, its exactly what i didn't want to happen
Want lots of really good content, money needs to be involved, behind all content are a human beings with limited time who have lives to live
If I were a frequent user of VRchat I'd hope for paid worlds that are child restricted. Then maybe I'd use it more. Nothing more annoying than exploring different worlds and seeing just how many squeakers end up wannabe JoshDubs enthusiasts.
this is exactly what will happen and im not here for it. =[
@@smittyvanjagermanjenson182just go to PC only worlds
@@cenciende9401 While that's true its also true that people is greedy and wanna turn everything into money making to the point things start to get bad or even predatory.
I think having a free wireless option for PC VR will make it easier for people to make drivers for things like face or hand tracking. Hopefully making it more accessible to everyone.
There is already free open source ALVR. Not sure if this new steam version is based off it or not. Ive used alvr and its been great
I am far more excited to think this is an indicator that Valves next HMD will be wireless :-)))))
Is quest airlink free?
hoping for hand tracking support personally.
@@tgw230 Yes, but it's not great, and geared for Quest only.
this new varjo headset is really freaking cool. it gets me wondering about the near future and how much better VR is gonna be.
LCD, so NOPE for me.
yeahhhhhhh@@StubbyPhillips
imagine if they finnaly crack a way to make this level of immersion just by using something akin to a bandage/blindfold over your eyes.
@@Secret_Squirrel_Scottishgamer Indeed. The Beyond isn't terribly far from that TBH. You really can forget it's on your face.
@@StubbyPhillips Not an LCD, but MINI LED.
I don't understand why nobody copy the index controller, especially for a 4000 USD headset
Patents, probably
@@0skuro they already use a bunch of valve patent, I don't see valve wanting to safeguard specifically the controller, pretty sure they will be pretty happy to sell a license for it
floor gang
FLOOR GANG
im still pessimistic about the microtransactions in vrchat
yay, supporting the creators, but i only see it going bad
@VioFax yeah, it's one of the reasons I kinda feel like not learning blender. For all we know next year they'll make a ai that can just make a world at the rate it's going by just typing in what you want.
floor gang!! owo
I dislike the VRChat monetization.
Don't get me wrong, I like the fact it's gonna be easier for creators to get paid, but I hate the implementation.
It uses coins, which are designed like coins in pay-to-win mobile games. They're made so it's hard to judge how much something costs.
You can also only buy them in packs, meaning you'll likely have some leftover after a purchase, meaning you'll want to buy more so they don't go to waste.
Even if you can cash out a single coin, doing so makes you lose half it's value, thanks to the 50% cut.
I know VRChat unfortunately can't get around the 50% cut, but they didn't have to make the value weird, they could've made 1 coin $0.01 USD, and they could've made it so you could buy individual coins!
It just feels so scummy IMO, and I can this becoming another Roblox situation, since those exact concerns are issues people have with Robux.
Glad to see Varjo coming out with a banger headset. Of all the headset makers, they were the ones poised to compete directly with Apple's Vision Pro. And considering the amount and quality of product Apple can turn out, they were in a somewhat dire position.
It's nice seeing them still able to push hardware boundaries and make it more accessible. Now all we need is an Aero 2.
I think Apple caught them with their pants down.
Also, Apple's pricing is more enticing for business owners for being a flat rate and cheaper.
@@MaddTheSane Also apple is such a large company it has more resources and VR apps will be much more mainstreamed on the Apple headset. It's about to get interesting.
The VR wars gonna be epic again
ikr
Zuckerberg be the real winner here.
Sony & Meta are the only leaders in this industry, nobody is selling more then 1 million headsets. Sony is currently the leader technically, since Quest hasn't sold 600,000 units, and Sony is likely far past 1 million sales by now.
@@ConservativeJuggaloPodcast And Apple hasn't officially entered the market.
And hasn't even announced a consumer model.
Once Apple drops Samsung gonna have something to say too.@@MaddTheSane
3:20 how many kidneys do you have? Or better question, how many people did lose their kidney for you VR addiction?
( ⚆ _ ⚆ )
Floor gang.
Floor
Honestly, floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor Gang
I'm not that amped about vrc's monetization effort; I feel like a monetary incentive, especially given their in-game currency model, is going to attract people seeking the money. Modern examples don't really leave me with much hope for this model.
Yea I just hope there wont be any pay walls to enter worlds(which is gonna happend 100%) or where you get barebones version of the world where you have to pay to actually play the intended experience of the world
That's a good thing. Want lots of really good content, money needs to be involved, behind all content are human beings with limited time who have lives to live
@@cenciende9401I'm sick of the whole "greed is good" mindset that modern companies have!
Also even if we don't get paywall worlds, or paywalled content, thrill said in the video that VRC creators get paid in vrc's proprietary currency. Roblox has the same issue where even if they get 50% of the revenue, it has an insane markup to turn that Monopoly money back into real money
@@pewdspersonaldronefromthef5546 It's not greed is good, it's people are going to be able to put in more effort to their work if that work also pays the bills
floor gang
I'm hoping the vr chat pay thing is more like a donation jar that's optional, and used sparingly maybe for some extra avatars. Idk, this could easily go horrible or well. 😅 I know if I could make money making a world, that would definitely motivate me to learn to make a world finally lol.
I'm not too thrilled to have VRchat worlds locked behind a paywall
@@Just_a_Piano_if they lock out little kids in exchange for money that's a potential gold mine.
this sounds like paid mods again, remember how that went for bethesda
FLOOR GANG
FLOOR GANG
fkoor gang!
FLOOR GANG
It seems Valve is going in the right way, shame the app isn't open source but being free is already great
Valve has a history of making software open source after they believe that it's fully developed and finished for their intended purpose or goal, so it may be the same case here
This obsession with open source is meh
Since it's Facebook's drivers they're likely not allowed to publish Facebook IP
Also, I think they weighed the value of making it open source vs. actually having a closed product that is in the Meta market with so much more reach to mainstream. I can see why they would have chosen the latter. I also, really hope, this is indicator of more VR software from Valve...like H-L 3 ahah.
I'm really hoping they make it work with linux, we're so close to me finally being able to uninstall Windows completely
In regards to the VRC changes, I just hope the map creators don't get too greedy, I don't think all of them will but some will likely get carried away I imagine. I'm glad it's here but I'm just cautiously optimistic.
Thanks for the consistently awesome uploads, Thrill!
Floor Gang ^_^
FLOOR GANG
It's wild how the Vision Pro has suddenly made $4000 sound like an actually reasonable price. The Apple effect is real
Edit: to clarify, I don't necessarily think this is a bad thing. It's just wild how much it changes the public's (and my own) perception of the cost.
The Apple Vision Pro doesn't need a PC
@@phil631still overpriced
@@corruptederror1952it probably isn’t depending on the cost of the tech. This shit ain’t cheap to make
Actually, Apple is pushing the prices down. The XR-3 costs $7000 plus a subscription, needs stations for tracking and isn't a standalone device. The Vision offers higher resolution and eye-tracking navigation that is yet to be seen in the industry. And now Varjo launches the XR-4 cutting almost half the price with no subscription.
@@phil631 that doesn't mean it has great graphics....
floorgang
floor gang
Stop selling kidneys, people are starting to wonder where you are getting them 😂
Underrated comment
I remember my first experience with actual vr. It was a while ago at gadget show live, and we were walking around the convention area. One of the booths had vr rings to try where you held onto a guard rail, wore some special shoes, and you could walk around a famous painting.
The shoes had no grip so you literally couldnt stand with them, but against being told not to, i let go of the ring to try and… tried to grab something that wasnt really there. I smacked my head on the rail and everyone was trying to make sure I was okay, but I was just fascinated by the idea of a world that didnt really exist
my first experience was with the dk1 at gadget show live!!!
i love this. thank you for sharing.
I think it's kinda funny how the VRChat credits now make it even more like the Oasis than it was before. Obviously the Oasis was more of an MMORPG that turned into a MMORPG hybrid with social experiences and productivity in addition to other things, but VRChat is really close to that now and it's sort of insane and cool.
floor Gang!
It’s always amazing to see how far vr technology has come since those first early headsets like the rift it’s truly incredible.
Is it? Or is it exactly expected, predicted trajectory. I think Rift was more incredible, because it really made viable, consumer VR a reality, the rest is normal tech advancement. I think the lucky part that Zuckerberg got obsessed over it and put sooo much money behind it.
I am not impressed. Still bulky and heavy, still garbage FOV. Still out of consumer price. 8 years later., and 12 years later since DK1.
Yeah I'm still rocking the CV1 and just can't convince myself to upgrade yet. Thinking of maybe trying the quest 3 but still not totally convinced it's worth the upgrade
@@milannesic57188 years later, you mean 28. The virtual boy came out in 1995 ;p
@milannesic5718 that's fine. The consumer market has only really just started to take off. We started at NES and are now at PS5 and that only took like 3 decades. The quest 3 in standalone mode is fairly strong for what it is, nearly surpassing the xbox 360 in quality after only 3 years after the quest 2. All the QoL gripes (FoV, optic stacks, and power draw) get fixed over time.
Im a bit angry about the monetization... Already worlds that are now charging for old mod features and access to the worlds... VRChat sucks now...
I love that Brad is just the official mascot for Deckard Copium
Lets go tuesday newsday on a friday night! coming from floor gang
Floor Gang
Dude is selling so many kidneys he must be on a watch list
Cryptocurrency will be the death of VRChat
Agreed. The thought of vrchat shop succs
It's not crypto, just regular ol' proprietary
Like we've had in games for decades now
This sucks, but please complain about the actual system
I think adding monitization to vrchat will be a bsd thing. The game is already plauged by shady characters and half assed strip clubs. Adding real money directly into the game i believe will worsen these issues and create new ones like, paywalling features that have no reason to be paywalled, pollarize communities by those who donated and those who havent, and scams.
already an issue you know. patreon paywalls. what this will do is just make it more mainstream. low effort cash grabs are going to be more common. lets just hope 1 or 2 good things come out amongst the wave of shit
floor gang!
FLOOR GANG
FLOOR GANG
For me, Steamlink's quality couldn't compare to the auto settings I have on Virtual Desktop.
Just got word that it only has DP1.4, so it's restricted to 30PPD unless the game specifically implements Varjos SDK (which is currently zero games).
So the Aero actually has higher PPD for consumer use cases, albeit lower FOV. Really a headscratcher that they went with DP1.4.
Yeah still 1.4. I asked them about it and apparently hey did some interesting stuff to stay right under the bandwidth with the eye tracking. The PPD on the pupil gaze is still 51PPD (according to them) with drastic fall off outside of the focus range.
@@ThrillSeekerVR That's true but only with SDK implementation so unfortunately for the consumer experience of Steam VR gaming, we will be stuck st 30PPD (lower than Aero due to the larger FOV).
It will still be amazing but much less appealing for the mad cost but does make the Aero still an appealing purchase at a good price now (although come on... Bigscreen beyond is what you'd really go for now haha).
@@HeadsetHistorianthanks for pushing me closer to purchasing the BSB. My daily driver is an aero but the form factor of the BSB has me drooling
Maybe because the best GPU that can run in as of today (4090) has DP1.4 so why try harder if hardware is anyways the limit
Meta: Quest 3 design
Varjo: " *YOINK* "
For the creator economy, sure the creators may get 50% of the split, but Gumroad only takes 10% of what avatar and world creators make, not to mention Patreon takes 25 cents on direct deposit payout and 1% payout fee for PayPal on top of an at most a 12% cut for membership fees. Sure, it's nice for people to support their favorite creators in game, however, the creators earn more still through outside platforms. Hell, I think some creators even just have a donation thing so they get 100% of donations anyways, so thinking about it from a purely monetary perspective, it makes sense to support creators through the means by which we are already doing so. VRChat wants to capitalize off of how convenient it will be paying for in-game subscriptions.
here to stop ppl saying first
First
A true hero
@@itsasinine3337and their mortal enemy
Doing the lord’s work
First
Floor gang 🕺🕺
FLOOR GANG
I honestly think that the XR4 is the biggest slap in Apple's face. Vario just looked at Apple and said "what do you got on us." I honestly think the selling point for this thing should be that it costs about as much as what Apple wants for their vision pro headset but is like 10 times better
Yeah I thought a lot of the same. XR3 was basically the only thing at Vision Pro's level and Varjo just one upped themselves.
Not to mention Quest 3 is 7x cheaper and has the largest VR gaming ecosystem period and does a lot of similar things with improved MR over Q2, leaving people wondering who Vision Pro is even targeting at this point. Sandwiched in-between.
@@TayoEXE eh I still don't want to be in the meta ecosystem. I was thinking about it but I'm going to stick with my Pico 4
thats nothing new. apple has always made weaker hardware thats priced higher. they excell at everything else. software and marketting. Thats why the iphone is so successful despite compettitors having better and cheaper hardware. its only till a few years ago that apple actually has decent hardware in their stuff.
the thing you forgot though is the apple headset is standalone. its made to be used standalone.
@@TayoEXEyeah gee I wonder if that much cheaper gaming device is meant to compete with an incredibly high end and unique headset, it’s definitely not like they were different markets.
What I think the headset shows is that it's still pretty amazing how solid the quest 3 is for price.
Yep I'm planning to use the quest 3 to finally be able to work on my patent properly. I can't draw for shit which means I can't properly show how it works despite having my proof of concept but with the 3D art apps in the quest 3 I can finally do that. I only wish I'd gotten it months ago but I didn't realize it was an option. The hell I probably could do it with the quest 2 but I was wholy uninterested in virtual reality. I just didn't realize that it was for more than just gaming at the time I didn't think they'd come that far.
Some of us are waiting with VERY deep pockets for the perfect VR system to get into. I have dropped $5,000+ for a laptop, so this is not much different. I want something so awesome, I could slip into a VR delusion and escape reality for the remainder of my retirement years.
Same boat honestly. Quest 2 Fallout 4 has been a stellar experience for now. Have you purchased a VR daily driver yet? Or are you still waiting?
@@Sarevok_Wins I see a couple bits of hardware I could use, but it is not available yet for the consumer market. Looks like the RTX 5000 series will be out (or at least announced) around the end of the year too.
@@Sight-Beyond-Sight I think I'll be rebuilding my setup once the 50 series drops, but I'm just looking for a nice VR set without the damns screen door effect.
@@Sarevok_Wins That is part of my problem too. My desktop is a 2nd gen i7. The 14900KS looks JUICY and dumping in some 192GB of DDR5 5600 MHz (CPU limit) would fill the need nicely. I want to get it all at once so I have something worthy of pushing the latest and greatest. Also looking at the Virtuix Omni One omni-directional treadmill to go with.
I'll never go back to wired.
VRC is becoming the metaverse Zucc wanted. Living and working in VR just became a lot more real and honestly, I can't wait to see what the change brings to VRC
I worry it will bring paywalled worlds, and bad conversion rates to creators from VRC's proprietary currency back into real money. I think this was certainly a decision that was made by the upper echelon of VRC, and I fully believe this will be bad for the community.
XR4 is not as good as you say. To have reviewed it for one month at work, I only agree with your VR feedbacks. MR is not their yet, I would prefer Quest 3 smoothness than XR4 really clear but only in controlled environment and with zero movement. And hell what a poor ergonomic!
XR-4 has a mini-LED panel and doesn't include a computer. Really puts the value of the AVP into perspective. (OLED panel + M2 and R1 chips.)
Tbh I’m kinda hoping the new creator monetization program for VRC will turn out well for everyone! I’m curious to see how it will be used going forward:O
No idea why people rave about this VRChat update. World makers already had good monetization thru Patreon etc before without a fat 50% cut.
Yeah, it's just too much.
And honestly, the use of credits is hella shady to me.
Excellent video, great wrap up of the news!
THANK YOU!!!!!!! :D
Hey Thrill. Will you talk about Resonite, the spiritual successor to Neos by the same dev team, but without the crypto? I feel like it needs more atention, make people aware of it.
I have been RAVING about variable focus for years and it is literally the *only* feature I’ve genuinely really wanted from a new VR headset since the technology was announced by oculus like six years ago! I am so insanely happy that this is coming out and that it’s going to come down in price soon! I’ve been saying that people keep wishlisting things like increased resolution, wider fov, lighter weight, better audio, etc, but almost none of it matters compared to the ability to focus on objects and use your eyes normally! This is the missing link between Virtual Reality and Reality Reality!
Its the passthrough cameras, not the headset lenses.
@@Nobody-Nowhere I know, but at least it’s a step in the right direction-having that feature available for any part of a headset immediately improves it in my book beyond all headsets that don’t have it at all
QOTW: How is AI intersecting with VR?
I for one am really stoked about the VR Chat monetization because it means it could finally be the thing that drives ARTISTS onto the platform. I mean its not hard to imagine maybe some very famous DJs might see this as motivation to do virtual concerts in VR Chat where you need to pay 5 or 10 bucks to attend. I don't think it's unreasonable at all if it brings out famous artists that normally wouldn't care.
All good until the 10K jumpscare.. Like, what the hell.
Yeah that surprised me as well. After using it I considered for a brief moment saving to get one until I saw the price. 4k is one thing. 10k is a whole different ball park.
And people think the Apple Vision Pro is expensive.
That was what Apple was going against and out-pricing: the XR3. Not the Meta Quest Pro.
Can I offer my first born child for the xr4?
The Varjo is really interesting but it will still probably be obliterated in sales and quality by the Vision Pro. The Vision is cheaper, it got a small footprint, it does not look like an Oculus VR1, and it has m-OLED screens. Software wise, nothing really beats Apple, and it will integrate so well within the ecosystem that it’s a no brainer for those companies.
You cannot compete against Apple if you are not a GAFAM. And even if you are, like Facebook, it’s still a task in its own right.
But I’d argue it’s not really what Varjo was going for anyway. If they were at an military convention, it’s because you do not give a 3.5k glass headset to a soldier for training.
They saw the Apple headset, they HAD to lower the price for most people, at this point, it’s probably be staying a niche product within a niche sector, even if the Vision lineup democratize Spatial computing headsets.
Sharp is bringing out a headset next year with auto-focus passtrhough.
So it wont take that long.
Meta: let's make a headset that anybody can buy...
Every other brand: let's make a headset that no one can buy 😂😂😂
I'm literally holding off on buying my next vr headset, waiting for a wider FOV headset with modern specs.
The pimax 12k, set to launch AFTER the crystal seems like a decent contender, but VR headsets keep dropping with index-like FOV.
Why can't we have bigger FOV headsets?
A small increase in FOV leads to huge increase in computing. We need faster chips or better cooling systems. Just my guess
I have an 8kx, I debated getting the Beyond, but the FOV wasn't there.
I've tried most VR products by way of my flight school, heaps of students have their own sim set ups and being them in from time to time. The 8kx still stands out all these years later.
Let's hope the 12k addresses all our needs, idc if it requires a beastly PC to run it, it has to be ABLE to do it.
But FOV beyond 140 is useless and taxing on hardware.
In game paywall will make me sad, since I can’t really afford this game to begin with - I guess it’s time to move on. 😢
There might be an issue if you sell both kidneys
Don't think I have seen your vids pop up on my feed with "seconds" shown before. Looking forward to this one and afraid to see the price!
Why the xr4 camera arrange looks so similar to the quest 3?
4000 is too much, so i am waiting for Pico 5 Pro. This one should have full face tracking.
And i hope VRChat is not too much pay-walled, also i hope creators are not going too far to buy for some silly effects.
I build worlds too, so i know almost exact what is needed to make it work.
I hope everything stays friendly and open.
Kinda sad for VRC. The most fun I had was just world hoping and having to pay for most would make it untenable. Especially if like me you are in a country where the money is very weak vs USD. You end up paying double or more for the same...
VARJO BABY
BACK AT IT AGAIN
Edit - I don't need it
What kind of PC spec/modem is required for that SteamVR link?
How does this have so many views and so few likes? Seems legit…
Great another prosummer++++ vr headset. The number of times I said this in the past 2 years, this getting ridiculous. These kind of products are slowing vr adoption way back. Ultra high tech without proper software integration is WORTHLESS.
Expect Apple to release a cheaper model in two or three years, once they refine things and ramp up production.
Im just waiting for nerve link now
Damn we can't even escape cover charges in virtual reality now
ok, but imagine Unrecord in this headset... think about that
within a decade we will probably have > 60ppd headset that are no biger than the beyond, that'll be fun.
Thrill and PHIA together irl, awesome!
I hope those stupid useless mask never come back 😂
Autofocus from PoLight, TLens 🇳🇴
The Rift S in 2023,the experience,is it worth it?
Subscriptions and the inevitable (imo) ability to tip people like musicians and dancers directly is a great thing overall but def gonna be a mixed bag. I’m not looking forward to the explosion of fake musicians using RUclips videos making a comeback.
Can I ask. Why the face mask? Genuine question.
The hype is real, and so is the expense! Only private industry and popular RUclipsrs need apply. Huge gap now between low end VR and high end. Hope that changes soon
The fact you got gobit to join this video is insane
is it just me or does it look like a shiny quest 3?
QOTW: i asked this before but ill ask again
If you were to make a vr headset , what would be the specs and how much would it cost?