Hey good job getting the emancipation proclamation right. It freed only the slaves that still resided in Confederate territory at the time of Jan of 1863. However it should have been mentioned that the Lincoln actually announced the proclamation right after the battle of Antietam. Lincoln was waiting for a major victory in the war before he proclaimed emancipation. This was both a personal achievement for Lincoln since he abhorred slavery to begin with. And it was also strategic, in order to keep European powers from entering the war; whom of course, also detested the practice of slavery, and would not intervene in a war to end it.
Lincoln was very scrupulous about his authority in areas that were not in rebellion. He couldn’t free the slaves in those areas because the constitution was still fully in force there and he didn’t have the authority
"Nine months, and four days ago. My father brought forth upon my mother, himself. And gave to her, a child. Conceived in a shack in Kentucky, and dedicated to the proposition that I will drink num-nums from a bottle and do little poo-poos in my pantses for the next two to three years" - Abraham Lincoln when he was born
Eli Whitney, the man who invented the cotton gin invented it because he thought that it would make slavery irrelevant and then it would phase out.But fun fact. No.It did not make slavery irrelevant.
Jeez, I remember when I first watched your videos in grade school, way back when they were released. I got flooded with a huge amount of nostalgia when I found this in my recommendations. Just wanted to take some time to say thank you, still working tirelessly after all these years in having your educational content be concise and interesting ❤
@@JohnDRuddyMannyMan Thank *you* for all you've done, good sir. You definitely shaped a big part of my love for learning about history that I still have today. I remember drawing little stick figurines in your videos at the back of my notebooks. It was really dumb but I had a lot of fun with it. And I'm about to enter college now. Good luck man, you're doing great
I remember in 7th grade my U.S History class had us do a project where we had to build and present inovative creations from the 1850's-70's. My dad helped me build the U.S.S Monitor but I never knew what the Monitor was.
Yeah! I'm glad you talk about all Confederates as bloodthirsty villains and depict them to my woke bullshit standards! Get the hell out of here! I can guarantee you're a fan of Atun-Shei Films.
@@Agentsierrabravo I'm sick and tired of everyone "oH lOsT cAuSe" yelling at Southerners for believing the war from their perspective when Northerners are the exact same way. They only listen to the conflict from the Northern point of view which says all Southerners were pro slavery racists who just wanted to own slaves because they were mean
@@BLACULA-Skeewoah Agreed. Reducing your Irishness to a mathematical value just means you don't cherish it at all. *No matter what the source of your math.*
6:20 also another interesting tidbit. Barnard Bee died at Bull Run before he was able to explain his comment. Some believe he wasn't actually referring to Jackson's posture but that he was being inactive and indecisive. It could have been a slight to Jackson but pop culture took the story in the other direction.
Something else you may wanted to have added or put as a footnote is that after the slave trade ended, more slaves were still imported to the US but from the Caribbean Islands instead.
"Four Scores and Eight Years Ago, Our Heroes declared independence from Great Britain. They prevail Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.." -Abraham Lincoln 1864. "He may have said that"
It's always hard for me to decide how much Lincoln used ending Slavery for a political tool vs his own ambition. Either way it is absolutely undeniable he would've handled reconstruction better than Andrew Johnson.
He new it was a moral evil but didn’t want to upset people with that so he only took action when he had to. What he did was the best thing to do during his time. If he had been faster about it, the south may have left even faster and more aggressively.
While the reasons for the American Civil War (ACW) are less relevant to the rest of the world (even though the whole slavery thing is arguably relevant to the world as a whole), the fact that this was the first war with many 'modern' tools like trains and the like makes this a conflict worth studying for other cultures.
By nationalism I think you mean regionalism Also like how the csa states have constitutions that say they left mainly to slavery. They also made laws to make sure no one will free thier own slave and to prevent future politicians and even the current csa president to outlaw slavery to make no sure no one had second thoughts on slavery could change that in office.
What the US did to Native Americans was not genocide by any definition (the dictionary or the UN definition) as is claimed in this video. The US government and the civilians of the US did not seek the deliberate killing of Native Americans because of their ethnic group. There were many "wars" between the US military and civilian conflicts that were caused by innumerable reasons. None of the reasons were because the population or government sought to destroy Native Americans. I put war in quotations because if you search US wars against Native Americans on google you will see a massive list. But if you actually look into those "wars" you will find that a insanely low percentage are actual wars. In the overwhelming majority of cases the "wars" were single conflicts not often normally involving the US military. If you look into the "wars" you will also find that in the vast majority of the "wars" listed the conflicts are actually started by the Native Americans via raids on American settlements. In addition to this the US treatment of Native Americans was comparatively much better then any other nation in the Americas (even Canada). It should be started by saying that of the population of Native Americans in all of the Americas the population north of Mexico made up a minor population to start with. Those estimates range from 1-5% of all Native Americans living North of Mexico with most estimates actually ranging in the 1-3% area. Which makes since due to the weather and the housing that Native Americans had at the time. With that stated if you then look into what happened in the other European nations colonies the treatment of Native Americans was incomprehensibly worse then their treatment in the territory of the US. And even in those territories South of the US essentially all scientists (I have not seen one disagree with this) agree that the vast majority (more then 90% in all studies) of Native Americans died because of diseases they had no immunity to. These were vastly deadly diseases that people from the Old World had gained immunity from over thousands of years. So when these diseases that had been working to their effectiveness on humans for all that time were brought to the Americas they found a population that had zero immunity to those diseases and thus was able to easily kill off the majority of the population. Lastly, of note on slavery the same thing applies. Slaves taken during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade from Africa to the US only equal a less then 3% total sent to the US. For example more then 40% of all the people taken from Africa went to Brazil yet we only always hear about slavery within the US. While slaves were treated much worse in all other lands they were taken to other then the US. Not to mention that slaves had been being taken from Africa to the Middle-East before the start of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and were continued to be taken for long after the end of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. The difference in the West is they became the first to actually outlaw slavery and then push for other nations to outlaw it. What is basically never mentioned is the US was still comparatively speaking one of the first nations to outlaw slavery. Slavery which was something that had been a part of human civilization for thousands of years at the point the US outlawed slavery.
Yes, I noticed that as well. The "Genocide" word is to easily thrown around in todays world without knowing what actually qualifies as slavery. What happened in the US to Native Americans was what happened to defeated peoples all over the world including within the US for thousands of years at the point the US was taking over the continent. People never seem to want to look at the ways that Native Americans were living prior to Europeans arriving (and even after). Native Americans fought wars against each other just as much as people all over the world did. And at the point of the US expanding, Native Americans were also still practicing slavery on their own (it was not something Europeans introduced to them) and were practicing a very barbaric form of warfare in the way they treated people they defeated. This including the killing of all defeated peoples including women and children as well as the many other deplorable actions that most of the world had stopped doing by that point in history to defeated enemies.
Agreed on both points. Nobody likes to mention that slavery in the US was actually very minor compared to all other American nations as well as in comparison to middle eastern and other Asian nations such as India.
"Bring the good old bugle boys, we'll sing another song; sing it with a spirit that will start the world along. Sing it as we used to sing it 50,000 strong, while we were marching through Georgia"
Hurrah! Hurrah! We bring the jubilee! Hurrah Hurrah! The flag that makes you free! So we sang a chorus from Atlanta to the see, while we were marching through Georgia!
Richmond, Virginia served as the capital of the Confederate States of America for almost the whole of the American Civil War. It was a vital source of weapons and supplies for the war effort, and the terminus of five railroads. The Union made many attempts to invade Richmond.
I wish the American flag was drawn more distinct, the red lines overlapping with the white lines make it look like the Republic of China flag when it's really small. Like here 14:52
@@dwarvenminer3329 Yeah, Sun yat-sen originally advocated for an American style Republic in China before the warlord era even began after that is was no more then a pipe dream sadly. A powerful democratic China would have been good for probably everyone
The Union's Best General: Gets known of making an entire army surrender, making General Lee SURRENDER and becoming President in 1869, nice, that man is Grant, and he's granted to be a historical figure for the ages.
620,000 Americans died during the U.S. Civil War! To put in perspective how deadly that was in today's terms, it would be the same if 65 million Americans died over the next 4 and half years. I say this because it seriously worries me everytime a Conservative says they want or believe another U.S. Civil War might happen when they don't seem to understand the severity of it!
Hey you call Liberal RinCons "Conservatives" because you think you are different from them... No your not, you are the same as them except they are more openly racist.
i love your military history videos that’s my favorite topic My 7th Great Uncle was in the American Civil War served on the Confederate side he was in the Thomas’s Legion of Cherokee Indians he served from 1862-1865
Great video, but my only criticism is that you forgot to include that John Wilkes Booth had planned triple murder to save the South by ordering Lewis Powell to kill Secretary of State William Seward and George Atzerodt to kill Vice President Andrew Johnson. Both of these attempted murders failed as Powell only managed to disfigure Seward at his mansion while Atzerodt got drunk and wandered away, rather than attempting to kill Johnson at the Kirkwood Hotel. Out of all the conspirators, John Wilkes Booth never lived to stand trial. Two weeks later on April 26, 1865, he was fatally shot to death at a tobacco barn by a Union corporal named Boston Corbett. In the coming months, 8 conspirators were tried and the four (Powell, Atzerodt, David Herold, and Mary Surratt) were sentenced to death by hanging. That’s my only criticism of this video. Not being rude.
I think the Crimean war was technically the first 'modern war' with US Civil war being the second such modern war, and slightly more modern than the Crimean war.
Cassius Clay also convinced the Russians to *declare War on both France & Britain* if they so much as recognized the Confederacy. Meaning if they traded with said states, they’d be recognizing the legitimacy of the rebels.
So I won't disagree that the US civil war may not be considered the first "modern war". That claim is actually something that is hard to prove since there is not definitive definition of what a modern war is. It could be said that only wars fought in the last 10 years are "modern wars". But in terms of the US civil war compared to the Crimean War I don't think that is a good example because basically everything that happened in the Crimean War happened in the US war in terms of modern combat. I'd actually say the US civil war was a more modern war in that it was a Total War with the whole of each society working to win the war for their side. I don't think the Crimean War was fought to that level (at least not within the UK or France). Then of course the US civil war had the use of trains in it being the first large scale war to use them extensively which was something also used in the Crimean War but to a much smaller level since Russia at the time had very few train lines, train engines or the training to use trains for deployments at a official level.
@@PhillyPhanVinny I don’t think the definition of a total war *is* modern warfare. The war in Iraq and Afghanistan are modern wars but nowhere are they ‘total wars’. I wouldn’t even say that the US civil war was. If that was true than the CSA would’ve probably conscripted slaves ASAP, and the US would’ve treated the CSA much more harshly. And the fact that a lot of what happened in the Crimean war happened in the civil war is sort of my point. Railroads, advanced firearms technology, more autonomy for soldiers; key traits for modern war. All seen first in Crimea. I think the US Civil War is a great example of an early ‘modern war’. And I do think the description is hard to pinpoint; after all the ‘modern period’ counts back to 1776. But I don’t think it can be called the first
I guess in fairness, the Russian Empire was pretty far behind in industrialization and still applied many outdated tactics that might’ve worked against the equally behind Ottoman Empire, whereas the British and French were the most advanced nation in the world at the time and maintained the upper-hand for most of the war. So the impact against technology was not as big compare to the US civil war.
The Civil War didn't end precisely because Reconstruction was ended prematurely. It just took on a different form. It went underground, which is why the South, and ironically the Republican Party now, are the way they are. In their minds, the war is still raging. Sometimes I feel like things overall would be much better if we had just let the South go. Especially because we wouldn't still be saddled with this extremely outdated idea that the American Union is perpetual. Why should anyone be bound to a contract that they didn't sign after all?
I appreciate the service of both Confederate and Union soldiers, however, I'm glad the Union won, people aren't property, they're people, they have natural rights such as freedom and the right to bear arms, just because a person looks a little different than you do doesn't mean you should put them to work and not treat them as equal, they're just as human as you are.
It not like most confederate soilders choose to join the fight (especially in the late war). Just like the north drafting was a thing too and many people tried to doge it.
@@wicklowpatster but its the nature right to defend your self. This includes having said weapons to use it when it's time to defend your rights (or gain some).
@@kingofflamingos4344 In countries where there is rule of law that's what the police and courts are for. When there is dire need of revolution, people can arm themselves (see Manny Man's videos on Irish history for this).
@John D Ruddy You do an Awesome Abraham Lincoln Voice So Iconic It's like over the top awesome Great Speech the Gettysburg Address was I Like when you done the Four Score and Seven years ago part a new birth of freedom great speech and Nice Words Abraham Lincoln has been my favorite US President for as long as i can remember cause i know all the great things he done for this nation in those terrible times he paid the ultimate price for Freedom, and holding our Country together and Sat our Country on the path we're Walking 156 years later
@@frostii2158 ok so essentially after you died in the year 1799 we had some more expansion, a lot of stuff happened in eroupe with some short french man who sold us a lot of land and got in a war with the british and caused all of Spain's territories in america to leave and become new countries, and then we got into a war with the british (we didn't do well) so then there was more expansion, texas split off from 1 of the previously mentioned spanish countries and later became a state which later got us in a war with mexico (the spanish state) where we earned a huge amount of land out west and then this civil war happened a few years later. So then there was some more expansion, until the year 1914 where a giant eroupian war erupted which everyone thought would be the last war ever (IT WAS NOT) and in 1917 we entered it on the side of britian and france (who were allies now apperently), also in this war russia became communist which will be important later, The point is Germany lost and basically collapsed giving rise to "national socialists" which were... Bad to put it lightly, so a new war started in 1939 and in 1941 the Japanese empire attacked us so we joined the war, the germans and japanese lost, there were a lot of trials and executions and we found that they worked to death over 6 million jews in giants prison camps, so now the world was devided between us and russia (still communist) and the cold war was declared. eroupe let all their colonies become independent, korea was split in 2, China and french Indochina became communist countries, the jews went back to israel and that started some wars, eroupe was split in 2, lots of wars in africa, a chrisis in cuba, all the while both sides possessed giant bombs that could destroy a city in 1 go. And then in 1991 the russia collapsed into a bunch of smaller states (1 of them was still russia) and the cold war ended. America became the worlds only superpower and hopes were high until 2003 when some angry muslim terrorist crashed a plane (a giant piece of metal that burns fuel to fly) Into 2 big towers we built in new York and to the pentagon (the nation's main military command post). so "the war on terror" was begun, we invaded iraq and Afghanistan to capture a man named Osama bin Laden who we thought was behind these attacks and both invasions went great until we occupied these countries and everything started collapsing until we pulled out of them. By which time (non communist) russia and (kind of communist but not really) china started becoming threats which is where we sit today
So how did the Emancipation Proclamation work If its purpose was to Free the slaves in the telling southern States (not Maryland Tennessee and Missouri) couldn't the Confederate States just choose to not honor the Emancipation?
Technically yes. It’s not as if the confederacy were like “oh well, I guess you’re all free now!” They still held onto them, but legally they were now free under the US. If they escaped, they would not be held as contraband.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey good job getting the emancipation proclamation right. It freed only the slaves that still resided in Confederate territory at the time of Jan of 1863. However it should have been mentioned that the Lincoln actually announced the proclamation right after the battle of Antietam. Lincoln was waiting for a major victory in the war before he proclaimed emancipation. This was both a personal achievement for Lincoln since he abhorred slavery to begin with. And it was also strategic, in order to keep European powers from entering the war; whom of course, also detested the practice of slavery, and would not intervene in a war to end it.
Lincoln was very scrupulous about his authority in areas that were not in rebellion. He couldn’t free the slaves in those areas because the constitution was still fully in force there and he didn’t have the authority
"Nine months, and four days ago. My father brought forth upon my mother, himself. And gave to her, a child. Conceived in a shack in Kentucky, and dedicated to the proposition that I will drink num-nums from a bottle and do little poo-poos in my pantses for the next two to three years" - Abraham Lincoln when he was born
A man of culture I see.
I see you watch history oversimplified
Oversimplified
Than child was me.
Oversimplified moment
A good quote that i think could apply to the Confederacy.
"Your rights END right about where other people's rights start"
Yep
Based
Eli Whitney, the man who invented the cotton gin invented it because he thought that it would make slavery irrelevant and then it would phase out.But fun fact. No.It did not make slavery irrelevant.
Really?
@Zeno the Filipino The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
My friend was right when he pinned the blame on Eli Whitney for the Civil War.
@@kevin8712 I dont know if it is right to blame Eli Whitney for the American Civil War
@@sheraznisar4833 I blame Jefferson Davis.
Atlanta: burns
General Sherman: *this is fine*
Hello Supreme Leader
General Sherman :THIS IS BEAUTIFUL. I can’t wait to show mom all the cool army stuff on it
what other choice he got
He just dropped his fire mix tape
Jeez, I remember when I first watched your videos in grade school, way back when they were released. I got flooded with a huge amount of nostalgia when I found this in my recommendations. Just wanted to take some time to say thank you, still working tirelessly after all these years in having your educational content be concise and interesting ❤
Thank you :) I wasn’t expecting that ;)
@@JohnDRuddyMannyMan Thank *you* for all you've done, good sir. You definitely shaped a big part of my love for learning about history that I still have today. I remember drawing little stick figurines in your videos at the back of my notebooks. It was really dumb but I had a lot of fun with it. And I'm about to enter college now. Good luck man, you're doing great
This so good. You do such a great job of explaining history, well done John.
Yeah, explaining it from a woke biased viewpoint I suppose.
@@stonewalljackson5692 cope
I remember in 7th grade my U.S History class had us do a project where we had to build and present inovative creations from the 1850's-70's.
My dad helped me build the U.S.S Monitor but I never knew what the Monitor was.
I love how you keep the lost cause shit out of this, thank you
He hates it, the myth will always tilt the truth
Yeah! I'm glad you talk about all Confederates as bloodthirsty villains and depict them to my woke bullshit standards!
Get the hell out of here! I can guarantee you're a fan of Atun-Shei Films.
@@stonewalljackson5692 someone’s upset
@@Agentsierrabravo I'm sick and tired of everyone "oH lOsT cAuSe" yelling at Southerners for believing the war from their perspective when Northerners are the exact same way. They only listen to the conflict from the Northern point of view which says all Southerners were pro slavery racists who just wanted to own slaves because they were mean
@@stonewalljackson5692 not all but most
An American here (Florida) it’s really crazy how an event that occurred over 150 years ago still is so relevant and divisive especially in the south
Three words. Lost cause mentality
as someone who is 90% irish, i love finding an irish person doing history! i’m so glad i found your channel!
As an irish person, I have to ask, How in the name of jaysus can you put a numeric value to a nationality?! 😂
@@BLACULA-Skeewoah ancestry tests
@@BLACULA-Skeewoah Agreed. Reducing your Irishness to a mathematical value just means you don't cherish it at all. *No matter what the source of your math.*
6:20 also another interesting tidbit. Barnard Bee died at Bull Run before he was able to explain his comment. Some believe he wasn't actually referring to Jackson's posture but that he was being inactive and indecisive. It could have been a slight to Jackson but pop culture took the story in the other direction.
Something else you may wanted to have added or put as a footnote is that after the slave trade ended, more slaves were still imported to the US but from the Caribbean Islands instead.
Stonewall Jackson's death remains as the top 10 anime betrayals
"Four Scores and Eight Years Ago, Our Heroes declared independence from Great Britain. They prevail Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.." -Abraham Lincoln 1864.
"He may have said that"
It's always hard for me to decide how much Lincoln used ending Slavery for a political tool vs his own ambition. Either way it is absolutely undeniable he would've handled reconstruction better than Andrew Johnson.
He new it was a moral evil but didn’t want to upset people with that so he only took action when he had to. What he did was the best thing to do during his time. If he had been faster about it, the south may have left even faster and more aggressively.
While the reasons for the American Civil War (ACW) are less relevant to the rest of the world (even though the whole slavery thing is arguably relevant to the world as a whole), the fact that this was the first war with many 'modern' tools like trains and the like makes this a conflict worth studying for other cultures.
By nationalism I think you mean regionalism
Also like how the csa states have constitutions that say they left mainly to slavery. They also made laws to make sure no one will free thier own slave and to prevent future politicians and even the current csa president to outlaw slavery to make no sure no one had second thoughts on slavery could change that in office.
Great video! Thank you for your work!
What the US did to Native Americans was not genocide by any definition (the dictionary or the UN definition) as is claimed in this video.
The US government and the civilians of the US did not seek the deliberate killing of Native Americans because of their ethnic group. There were many "wars" between the US military and civilian conflicts that were caused by innumerable reasons. None of the reasons were because the population or government sought to destroy Native Americans. I put war in quotations because if you search US wars against Native Americans on google you will see a massive list. But if you actually look into those "wars" you will find that a insanely low percentage are actual wars. In the overwhelming majority of cases the "wars" were single conflicts not often normally involving the US military. If you look into the "wars" you will also find that in the vast majority of the "wars" listed the conflicts are actually started by the Native Americans via raids on American settlements.
In addition to this the US treatment of Native Americans was comparatively much better then any other nation in the Americas (even Canada). It should be started by saying that of the population of Native Americans in all of the Americas the population north of Mexico made up a minor population to start with. Those estimates range from 1-5% of all Native Americans living North of Mexico with most estimates actually ranging in the 1-3% area. Which makes since due to the weather and the housing that Native Americans had at the time. With that stated if you then look into what happened in the other European nations colonies the treatment of Native Americans was incomprehensibly worse then their treatment in the territory of the US. And even in those territories South of the US essentially all scientists (I have not seen one disagree with this) agree that the vast majority (more then 90% in all studies) of Native Americans died because of diseases they had no immunity to. These were vastly deadly diseases that people from the Old World had gained immunity from over thousands of years. So when these diseases that had been working to their effectiveness on humans for all that time were brought to the Americas they found a population that had zero immunity to those diseases and thus was able to easily kill off the majority of the population.
Lastly, of note on slavery the same thing applies. Slaves taken during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade from Africa to the US only equal a less then 3% total sent to the US. For example more then 40% of all the people taken from Africa went to Brazil yet we only always hear about slavery within the US. While slaves were treated much worse in all other lands they were taken to other then the US. Not to mention that slaves had been being taken from Africa to the Middle-East before the start of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and were continued to be taken for long after the end of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. The difference in the West is they became the first to actually outlaw slavery and then push for other nations to outlaw it. What is basically never mentioned is the US was still comparatively speaking one of the first nations to outlaw slavery. Slavery which was something that had been a part of human civilization for thousands of years at the point the US outlawed slavery.
Yes, I noticed that as well. The "Genocide" word is to easily thrown around in todays world without knowing what actually qualifies as slavery. What happened in the US to Native Americans was what happened to defeated peoples all over the world including within the US for thousands of years at the point the US was taking over the continent.
People never seem to want to look at the ways that Native Americans were living prior to Europeans arriving (and even after). Native Americans fought wars against each other just as much as people all over the world did. And at the point of the US expanding, Native Americans were also still practicing slavery on their own (it was not something Europeans introduced to them) and were practicing a very barbaric form of warfare in the way they treated people they defeated. This including the killing of all defeated peoples including women and children as well as the many other deplorable actions that most of the world had stopped doing by that point in history to defeated enemies.
Agreed on both points. Nobody likes to mention that slavery in the US was actually very minor compared to all other American nations as well as in comparison to middle eastern and other Asian nations such as India.
@@rayferrone4518 Thank you
Slavery is still a part of many places around the world. The "evil" west did away with it, but somehow we're still the bad ones.
It's all the woke BLM bullshit
"Bring the good old bugle boys, we'll sing another song; sing it with a spirit that will start the world along.
Sing it as we used to sing it 50,000 strong, while we were marching through Georgia"
Hurrah! Hurrah! We bring the jubilee! Hurrah Hurrah! The flag that makes you free! So we sang a chorus from Atlanta to the see, while we were marching through Georgia!
@@STepanHAmbroski And there where many union men who swept with joyful tears,
When they saw the honered flag they had not seens for years
@@gergelylaszlo5463 Hardly could they be restrained from breaking forth in tears! While we were marching through Georgia!
@@crimsonterror5795 Hurrah, hurrah! we bring the jubilee! Hurrah, hurrah! the falg that makes you free!
so we sang our chorus from atlanta to the sea!
Richmond, Virginia served as the capital of the Confederate States of America for almost the whole of the American Civil War. It was a vital source of weapons and supplies for the war effort, and the terminus of five railroads. The Union made many attempts to invade Richmond.
Well they did eventually. Don’t know why you act like they didn’t.
I wish the American flag was drawn more distinct, the red lines overlapping with the white lines make it look like the Republic of China flag when it's really small. Like here 14:52
The ROC flag was based off the American and English colors
@@anakinskywalker9848 That makes sense, especially since some Chinese thinkers like Sun Yat-sen drew inspiration from the US
@@dwarvenminer3329 Yeah, Sun yat-sen originally advocated for an American style Republic in China before the warlord era even began after that is was no more then a pipe dream sadly. A powerful democratic China would have been good for probably everyone
Cool vid. Wish I was round for reconstruction =(
I was looking our my window and saw your funereal in 1865
Man I wish you were around for it too. Probably would have gone better
@@abrahamlincoln8037 Did you like it?
The world would be so much better
I dunno; Lincoln would still be reeling from Willie's death.
The Union's Best General: Gets known of making an entire army surrender, making General Lee SURRENDER and becoming President in 1869, nice, that man is Grant, and he's granted to be a historical figure for the ages.
620,000 Americans died during the U.S. Civil War! To put in perspective how deadly that was in today's terms, it would be the same if 65 million Americans died over the next 4 and half years. I say this because it seriously worries me everytime a Conservative says they want or believe another U.S. Civil War might happen when they don't seem to understand the severity of it!
probably more if you facto in nuclear weapons
Hey you call Liberal RinCons "Conservatives" because you think you are different from them... No your not, you are the same as them except they are more openly racist.
@@Elite20001 go back to twitter
@@Elite20001 Not all conservatives are racist, even though more of them are than liberals. And the two are very different.
They truest don’t, but they really don’t want that. It’s a tactic to rally support.
17:23 I performed this song during district choir and I never seen a crowd moved by a song before
i love your military history videos that’s my favorite topic
My 7th Great Uncle was in the American Civil War served on the Confederate side he was in the Thomas’s Legion of Cherokee Indians he served from 1862-1865
Props to your uncle!
I love your vids John
I like how you don't flatly say the more blunt bad history but showing it in the animation.
I love how you draw everything
Nitpick: ‘Confederate’ is the adjective. Confederacy is the noun.
Absolutely Smashing!
Glad to see you remastering your old content. Btw, what information did you have to correct?
You fought all the way, Johnny Reb, Johnny Reb!
Oh boy, remastered video, heck yeah!
Could you do the North King Street massacre 1916
3:41
Right before this time, there was a lot, and I mean a lot of southern aggression
Great video, but my only criticism is that you forgot to include that John Wilkes Booth had planned triple murder to save the South by ordering Lewis Powell to kill Secretary of State William Seward and George Atzerodt to kill Vice President Andrew Johnson. Both of these attempted murders failed as Powell only managed to disfigure Seward at his mansion while Atzerodt got drunk and wandered away, rather than attempting to kill Johnson at the Kirkwood Hotel. Out of all the conspirators, John Wilkes Booth never lived to stand trial. Two weeks later on April 26, 1865, he was fatally shot to death at a tobacco barn by a Union corporal named Boston Corbett. In the coming months, 8 conspirators were tried and the four (Powell, Atzerodt, David Herold, and Mary Surratt) were sentenced to death by hanging. That’s my only criticism of this video. Not being rude.
I wonder what would have happened if my ancestor didn’t kill Lincoln
I feel like we need to admit that most of the problems in modern America is directly because of the failure of reconstruction.
Dear John D. Rudy a.k.a. Manny Man!
Would you be so kindly to think on making the video on English Civil War?
Thank you!
Irony: The last battle of the American Civil War was a Confederate victory.
Were the closing lines of your commentary an oblique reference to the 2nd Amendment?
I think the Crimean war was technically the first 'modern war' with US Civil war being the second such modern war, and slightly more modern than the Crimean war.
That is true, the Crimean War was also the 1st war where photography was used
When (John)ny comes marching home HURRAH!
Very well done.
Cassius Clay also convinced the Russians to *declare War on both France & Britain* if they so much as recognized the Confederacy. Meaning if they traded with said states, they’d be recognizing the legitimacy of the rebels.
Fun lil fact: I live near the site of the first battle of the Mexican American war and the final battle of the Civil War! BROWNSVILLE TEXAS! :D
do vids about the estonian freedom independence war the finnish civil war and the polish war vs the soviets
I’m not sure this can be called the first ‘modern war’. I think that honor should go to the Crimean War
So I won't disagree that the US civil war may not be considered the first "modern war". That claim is actually something that is hard to prove since there is not definitive definition of what a modern war is. It could be said that only wars fought in the last 10 years are "modern wars".
But in terms of the US civil war compared to the Crimean War I don't think that is a good example because basically everything that happened in the Crimean War happened in the US war in terms of modern combat. I'd actually say the US civil war was a more modern war in that it was a Total War with the whole of each society working to win the war for their side. I don't think the Crimean War was fought to that level (at least not within the UK or France). Then of course the US civil war had the use of trains in it being the first large scale war to use them extensively which was something also used in the Crimean War but to a much smaller level since Russia at the time had very few train lines, train engines or the training to use trains for deployments at a official level.
@@PhillyPhanVinny I don’t think the definition of a total war *is* modern warfare. The war in Iraq and Afghanistan are modern wars but nowhere are they ‘total wars’. I wouldn’t even say that the US civil war was. If that was true than the CSA would’ve probably conscripted slaves ASAP, and the US would’ve treated the CSA much more harshly.
And the fact that a lot of what happened in the Crimean war happened in the civil war is sort of my point. Railroads, advanced firearms technology, more autonomy for soldiers; key traits for modern war. All seen first in Crimea.
I think the US Civil War is a great example of an early ‘modern war’. And I do think the description is hard to pinpoint; after all the ‘modern period’ counts back to 1776. But I don’t think it can be called the first
I guess in fairness, the Russian Empire was pretty far behind in industrialization and still applied many outdated tactics that might’ve worked against the equally behind Ottoman Empire, whereas the British and French were the most advanced nation in the world at the time and maintained the upper-hand for most of the war. So the impact against technology was not as big compare to the US civil war.
do you have anything on the mexican american war?
That outro music is amazing. What is it?
I think Manny Man does history guys
Good video 👌
Hi u went to my school and taught are class about history also i subscribed and liked and turned on notifacations
I'd wanta be in the Midwest for that
"Leonidas PARK" 🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
american civil war was the most deadliest conflicts in american history
Antietam was the deadliest battle in American history
Some of the dates are wrong
Oh I wish I was in Dixie hooray hooray In Dixieland I'll take my stand to Live and Die in Dixie
To arms , to arma
The Civil War didn't end precisely because Reconstruction was ended prematurely. It just took on a different form. It went underground, which is why the South, and ironically the Republican Party now, are the way they are. In their minds, the war is still raging.
Sometimes I feel like things overall would be much better if we had just let the South go. Especially because we wouldn't still be saddled with this extremely outdated idea that the American Union is perpetual. Why should anyone be bound to a contract that they didn't sign after all?
Which 1
17:30 kinda funny seeing my real-life name on youtube =)
Virginia North Carolina Tennessee were in The confederacy
Checkmate Lincolnites!
I appreciate the service of both Confederate and Union soldiers, however, I'm glad the Union won, people aren't property, they're people, they have natural rights such as freedom and the right to bear arms, just because a person looks a little different than you do doesn't mean you should put them to work and not treat them as equal, they're just as human as you are.
It not like most confederate soilders choose to join the fight (especially in the late war). Just like the north drafting was a thing too and many people tried to doge it.
@@kingofflamingos4344 that is true
Bearing deadly weapons is not a "natural right". The whole of the rest of the world (and a lot of Americans) would disagree with you on that.
@@wicklowpatster but its the nature right to defend your self. This includes having said weapons to use it when it's time to defend your rights (or gain some).
@@kingofflamingos4344 In countries where there is rule of law that's what the police and courts are for. When there is dire need of revolution, people can arm themselves (see Manny Man's videos on Irish history for this).
Nice
@John D Ruddy You do an Awesome Abraham Lincoln Voice So Iconic It's like over the top awesome
Great Speech the Gettysburg Address was
I Like when you done the Four Score and Seven years ago part
a new birth of freedom
great speech and Nice Words Abraham Lincoln has been my favorite US President for as long as i can remember cause i know all the great things he done for this nation in those terrible times he paid the ultimate price for Freedom, and holding our Country together and Sat our Country on the path we're Walking 156 years later
No John Brown? Come on now
Ok I don’t blame you for this error but in the u.s. Maryland is pronounced (maraland)
Can you do a video about Civil War in Yugoslavia 1941-1945 during WW2 but before you do that i prefer you watch Kingdom of Yugoslavia in WW2
hey can u make the presidents of the Philippines a video?
You / may / have / wasted / your / time / decoding / this
Yes I did sir…
*B U T I D I D I T A N Y W A Y S!!!*
Finally!! Hahahaha
I’m hear early yasss!
Grant actually who try to hunt down the early KKK
The capital was Richmond Virginia
Keep watching…
@@JohnDRuddyMannyMan I finished
korean war please
No.
poggers
I wanted to learn about the American civil war. Not your political opinions.
Is that what you told Russian people in 1917?
damn tsar nicholas the 2nd prob the most incompetent leaders in world war 1 eh
Damn okay you got me there
The so-called "battle of the ironclads" at Hampton Roads was really nothing revolutionary.
What tf did i miss 🙄
You want a list?
@@TheUSgoverment Yeah im really confused
@@frostii2158 ok so essentially after you died in the year 1799 we had some more expansion, a lot of stuff happened in eroupe with some short french man who sold us a lot of land and got in a war with the british and caused all of Spain's territories in america to leave and become new countries, and then we got into a war with the british (we didn't do well) so then there was more expansion, texas split off from 1 of the previously mentioned spanish countries and later became a state which later got us in a war with mexico (the spanish state) where we earned a huge amount of land out west and then this civil war happened a few years later. So then there was some more expansion, until the year 1914 where a giant eroupian war erupted which everyone thought would be the last war ever (IT WAS NOT) and in 1917 we entered it on the side of britian and france (who were allies now apperently), also in this war russia became communist which will be important later, The point is Germany lost and basically collapsed giving rise to "national socialists" which were... Bad to put it lightly, so a new war started in 1939 and in 1941 the Japanese empire attacked us so we joined the war, the germans and japanese lost, there were a lot of trials and executions and we found that they worked to death over 6 million jews in giants prison camps, so now the world was devided between us and russia (still communist) and the cold war was declared. eroupe let all their colonies become independent, korea was split in 2, China and french Indochina became communist countries, the jews went back to israel and that started some wars, eroupe was split in 2, lots of wars in africa, a chrisis in cuba, all the while both sides possessed giant bombs that could destroy a city in 1 go. And then in 1991 the russia collapsed into a bunch of smaller states (1 of them was still russia) and the cold war ended. America became the worlds only superpower and hopes were high until 2003 when some angry muslim terrorist crashed a plane (a giant piece of metal that burns fuel to fly) Into 2 big towers we built in new York and to the pentagon (the nation's main military command post). so "the war on terror" was begun, we invaded iraq and Afghanistan to capture a man named Osama bin Laden who we thought was behind these attacks and both invasions went great until we occupied these countries and everything started collapsing until we pulled out of them. By which time (non communist) russia and (kind of communist but not really) china started becoming threats which is where we sit today
Texas was defended by a Pink ball
Away down south in the land of traitors,
@Bartholomew lmao
Great video, but I enjoy your fast-talking delivery more.
The capital was Richmond and there was 13 southerner states to secede else wise the Video was awesome
Sorry
u1gzjm
#von.ong
Racism may not have been ended...but by now its on life support.
Lincoln Is Overrated
You are probably just jealous Teddy.
So how did the Emancipation Proclamation work
If its purpose was to Free the slaves in the telling southern States (not Maryland Tennessee and Missouri) couldn't the Confederate States just choose to not honor the Emancipation?
Technically yes. It’s not as if the confederacy were like “oh well, I guess you’re all free now!” They still held onto them, but legally they were now free under the US. If they escaped, they would not be held as contraband.