The whole no IBIS thing is overblown. It does have it's merits, I agree. I would like to stabalize my xf90mm, sure. It's definitely not a deal breaker though, especially on a $1500 body. For real video work, you need a gimbal. For proper stabilization, you need a tripod. Do I miss shots because I don't have IBIS, yes, a few... And on the whole, it's not a big deal. And the battery life? Come on guys, put an extra battery in your pocket. They are small. Every camera is a compromise. Pick the one that works best for your needs and just go out and have fun.
@@DustinAbbottTWI I agree with you, Dustin.. And the argument will make a lot of sense when Sony releases their a6500 successor with IBIS for similar money.
@Phil Jones65 I guess the XH2 will solve that problem for you. I shoot mainly portraits so IBIS is fairly irrelevant for me in most cases as I don't like to shoot below 1/60. IBIS would definitely be nice for the XF90 though. I do see the merits in certain low light applications like architecture/product photography.
I take delight in my X-T3 and every Fuji lens I own, I find that it to be a tool that inspires creativity. Just look at the features - max. shutter speed, focus peaking, stacking, film simulations. I can use it for portraits, macro and any other unusual scenario. My gripes are small, for example I don’t like that it does not show the actual ISO beforehand when auto ISO mode is active, it only shows the maximum. I also really like the grip, so I can use the camera like a larger pro body with plenty battery life, or a discreet unit with a small footprint coupled with fantastic small sized lenses that can travel everywhere.
Sydney_Image I think it is might be because I am using back button focus using AF-L, and only use the shutter button for capturing. I am not absolutely sure if there is any menu option that can change this behavior, but I doubt it.
Sydney_Image I agree, I got one with an X-T20 and when I traded the camera in for the X-T3 I decided to keep the lens. It is my only Fuji zoom lens, and I highly rate it.
I am a Canon DSLR shooter but I brought the X-T3 as an all round travel camera and i absolutely love it. I just got back from a week in Cuba with my X-T3 and only 1 lens (23mm f2) Its a wicket system.
Fuji I LOVE your flip SCREEN concept! They have in my opinion the best flip screen arrangement on the marked. Makes high/low photo a breeze compared to the Panny/Oly/Canon idea where you have to flip it all the way out before rotating etc which makes you miss the moment. 100% cudos to Fuji here. This vlogging-thingy is just for a few users compared to the large amount of photographers out there.
Got XT3 and A7RIII among my cameras. XT3 is great, will go on all vacations with me. Autofocus tracking is brilliant and in my opinion at the top 3 of mirrorless world. Nice review Dustin. Now you need to review Nikon Z6 next.
Even though I'm using Sony A7m3, but I'm always the fan of Fuji. They make cameras and lenses that people want to use . Hybrid RF shooting experiences like X-Pro series, beautiful, classic Fujinon lenses... I appreciate Sony's pragmatic approach, but I really love the nostalgic value of Fuji.
Same. I've got the A7riii, but the XT3 is absolutely beautiful. I'd love to get one to replace the a6000 I always carry for street photography. It'll have to wait though.
I’m on the same boat as you. I use a Sony a7iii with GM lenses for my wedding work. I also have the Fuji XE-3 for fun with a couple of nice primes. Tempted to get a second hand xt2 or even a new xt3 to try out for some of my engagement & family sessions. For a wedding, I love the continuous eye auto focus of the a7iii. Once the Fuji system gets to that level, then I’ll consider it for wedding work. Great review Mr. Abbot.
What people will complain about today! My first camera was a Pentax 1000. I don't remember it being a Rangefinder. For me a Rangefinder is a NOT through the lenses camera viewer, but I could be incorrect. I love my X-T2 and hope to someday purchase a X-T3. Thanks for your work and review Mr Abbott.
X-T3 (previously X-T2) made me move from Canon (not particularly any flaw of Canon 5D MIV) and become Fuji exclusive (X-T3 primary and GFX-50S as special purpose). Primarily their menu system + retro look + physical controls + out of camera JPEG (saves tons of time for me). IBIS is not necessarily a MUST for a photographer (for vlogger it's a different issue altogether, in that case I'd advise to get a video cam) unless you are shooting in a cave (some street photography does demand extreme low light and hence stable hands) or no access to OIS lenses. Fuji is doing a great job, probably making many take a leap into their GFX system (lack of FF)
@@DustinAbbottTWI awesome, I am keen to know the long exposure and flash photography (Their fuji ef x500 works great on HSS above 1/125 - tested 1/500 so far). All the best. It's a beast of the camera, takes a while to make changes to your workflow and it' definitely not a video featured camera (personally, I like the fact that there is no much video things packed in it)
I disagree about the IBIS. It's not just a low light and video feature. Shooting stationary wildlife with long lenses could be better if there was a decent body with IBIS for it. Sadly there isn't. MFT is unacceptably noisy, Sony's telephotos cost an arm and a leg, Nikon and Canon don't have IBIS. Neither does this Fuji, for no reason at all.
I came over from Canon full-frame to the X-T3 and I am very pleased so far. The video quality of the Fuji is outstanding, right out of the box. The still image quality is excellent. I tried the Sony A7III and although it's a good camera, I was never that happy with it, so sold it. The Fuji is a photographer's camera, one that inspires and makes me think about what I'm doing. In addition, the system has a great lineup of affordable, high quality lenses that make it a great choice for a variety of shooting situations.
I got the x-t3 as my first camera and i really Love the physical dials but i hate the Ergonomics. The x-h1 has pretty much perfect economics but it lacks the features for the same price... I'll get a cheap grip for it and hope it will improve the Ergonomics 👌
Enjoy. Just watch for some potential hunting when shooting static shots of you on camera. You'll have to be careful to minimize that, as this is a Fuji weakness.
@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you. All of my videos are "talking head" videos of myself. The xt3 might have trouble with even those? Should I just set the camera in manual focus? Thanks again!
Just experiment with it. I haven't had "talking head" success with Fuji, but maybe your experience will be different. Otherwise, yes, MF is the best option.
I own both Sony A9 and XT3, I love XT3 for its light weight and performance, the classic dials, and beautiful body design is also one of the reason people choose XT3 anyway :P My A9 and GM lenses are great but heavy, XT3 is my almost perfect traveling camera, the only thing I hope is FUJI will put IBIS on the next XT camera. I like to travel light and I’m so lazy don’t even want to travel with tripod these days. :P IBIS helps a lot at handheld low light situation and expand more possibilities for travelers. I prefer my XF1855mm kit over XF1655F2.8 because the OIS is really useful. I bought XF1855mm and XF50140mm which covers my traveling use, I will consider invest more on FUJI once the next XT camera gets IBIS. :)
You can also use your phone to control the camera. Start/Stop and focus. This works pretty good for framing yourself, and starting and stopping recording.
I think you should get to the XH series for IBIS. asking IBIS for XT series is like asking Sony to put ibis on A63XX when they specifically placed it the A65XX series. just my 2 cents
I'll concede your first point, but your second is incorrect. I fully anticipate that IBIS will be in future Sony APS-C mirrorless bodies - not just the a6500. It was a step forward for the series, not so much a way of distinguishing a new line.
There's something especially lovely about the X-E1's sensor, which I believe it shares with the X-Pro1 and X100S. This is the main reason I still use the X-E1 as a travel camera when I have no need for using adapted lenses, as focus peaking doesn't work especially well with that camera. Also love the form factor.
Apart from the previous comment its the H.265 codec that interests me in the Fuji video features. I used the codec with the older Samsung 4k and file sizes and battery usage is far less - thereby less possibility of over heating.
@@DustinAbbottTWI It has to be - sony a6500 was released in Dec 1016. And it is now much cheaper in terms of direct competition. And with ibis. So they have to provide something incremental before sony's next update. Also more native sigma lenses for sony - cheaper too.
Thanks for the review, Dustin. I must say, I never had a bad photo when I was using the XT-2. So, it appears this might be a great backup to my a7riii as an around town camera, for casual use.
Great camera, and as you've pointed out, it's part of the only serious dedicated aps-c system in the market. I've got the x-t2 with the "kit" lens, 16mm, 56mm and 100-400mm. I'll wait for the x-h2 instead, hoping that they'll bring bigger batteries and I need the extra grip especially for the 100-400mm. I watch you for the last 2-3 years, you're one of the most serious and reliable reviewers out there. Don't mind the subs, there isn't any justice in our universe anyway. Keep up the good work!
AFAIk you've already got Sony and Canon gear so...well, you know better. I'm a Fuji shooter mostly and have this x-t2 for 1,5 year now but I want to get out some more thousand clicks before I change. When I do, I really hope the battery is bigger because as you well know, this is the Achilles heel of this system. The bigger grip and the IBIS that x-h2 will offer are certainly nice bonuses.
Thank you. I shall notice, that the old-school physical dials and switches have a caveat. They may not be controlled by custom settings profiles. For example, when I switch to timelapse shooting profile, a score of non standard settings are automatically applied (M mode, MF, single-shot, 16:9, F/16 etc). My Panasonic LX100 has manual controls for aperture and aspect ratio (!!!), therefore I still need to adjust them manually back and forth even after applying the settings profile. Also I heavily rely on presets (involving aperture, drive mode, AF mode etc) in daily shooting, so the old-school controls are less than optimal. I've just purchased the third body - A6300 as a companion to A7III.
Yeah, that is a downside. I like the physical controls in slow paced situations where I go through every setting anyways, but I also like the automatic stuff like resetting the exposure compensation to 0 everytime you turn on the camera or custom settings which is possible with the more usual digital camera conntrols.
Hi Dustin Thank you for your review this is why i did buy one 1week ago and FWI Fuji delivers all Cameras factory Settings in Energy saving Mode this is also hindering auto Focus to work properly, to change that under: Settings/ Powermanagment/PERFORMANCE /Boost Just wanna let you know cheers
you dont have to only control the camera using the physical controls on the top of the body, you can use the front and back wheels to set your ISO and shutter speed. Moving from a Canon 5d M3, it's actually as easy to use.
Hi Dustin, thanks for all your reviews!! I'm an amateur apsc still shooter, not interested in full frame and not doing any video work. I'm considering switching to Fuji system. Is it a good move for me in your opinion? (considering sony is about to release its new apsc camera) thanks a lot!
Actually I agree with your "rangefinder design". I would say the X-H1 is the "non rangefinder design" or "DSLR like design" Thanks for the great video !
oh, I was thinking of the aesthetics rather than the operation. As Fuji choose to use the dedicated-dials approach compared to other mainstream designs....
Another very comprehensive review, thanks Dustin. Nothing controversial here at all ;) Were it not for a fairly extensive investment in Sony kit, I would jump onto the Fujifilm bandwagon without any regrets, other than the X-T3's lack of IBIS. (It worked extremely well on the X-H1 that I tried for a few days). Their dedicated APS-C lenses are enviable and the retro look with manual controls is very desirable.
Thanks for the comprehensive and thorough review on the X-T3. Looking to downsize on weight over my Canon 5d mk iii and glass for travel and journalism work. This is the system to go to. The Fuji glass looks excellent. No IBIS? No biggie. I guess I'm old school, learned how to steady hand held back in the day when I had my first Nikkormat and used "high speed" Kodak Tri-X 400 ASA for low light and action.
You can definitely survive without IBIS (all of us had until a couple of years ago). I make a big deal out of that mostly because some competitors do offer it.
I have also made the same exact switch, even if i did keep some of my Canon gear. The XT3 is soo fun to use, it feels like going back to my old Canon AT-1 in terms of controls. But the retro feel is a good camouflage because its really a high tech camera with all the features I need and even more. And one more thing, the lenses.... Even the pancake lens (27mm 2.8) is fantastic, maybe because you dont have the issue with back/front focus like on the DSLR. Autofocus is great and the eye detect system, i will never ever go back again. One thing though, I have been a primary RAW shooter with the Canon, but the Fuji Jpg straight out of camera is so good that i now, often use only JPG and have RAW on the second card just in case. IBIS, would have been nice, but with stabilized lenses its not that big of a problem.
Expanded ISO is essentially the equivalent of digital zoom. It is using electronics to artificially produce more "ISO", but typically comes at the cost of dramatically diminishing returns.
Akk the review seem to say if you don't like physical controls it might not be for you....I have mine setup EXACTLY like I did my D800 and other cameras with just the wheels and NEVER use the dials. You don't HAVE to use them its just more options.
As for vid footage and color, you may have a look at Kevin Mullins videos, they have recently been filmed on an X-T3, and I think it's color and general quality is sublime... Others have said that too. Maybe it is a thing of fine tuning the settings...
Hi Bernhard, I'm not familiar with Kevin, but there's a good chance he is grading the footage in post. You can get great footage out of any of these cameras with LOG if you do grading in post. I pump out 2-3 videos per week, however, and don't have the time to do a lot of grading of my footage most of the time. I use it right out of camera.
I kept going back and forth between this XT3 and the Panasonic G9 - I ended up buying the G9 with the Leica 12-60 - for two reasons: High Resolution Mode (for studio photography) and IBIS. I'm starting to think this camera would be a much better choice for street photos - or any photos that would require a quick touch. I love the flip out screen on my G9 - but for fast street type shots - it's a little slow to fold out. I also think Fuji color science is top notch. Guess I'll be saving my coins and buy this as a second camera - lol. Nice review!! Thanks!
@@DustinAbbottTWI Exactly. I sat down and wrote down precisely what I needed a new camera for (Macro photography of my personal jewelry work and for making RUclips videos of me producing said work) and at the end of the day - the Panasonic G9 won out with it's excellent video, flip around screen, high resolution mode and a few other image stacking features. I still think the fuji system is amazing and I kind of miss having a slightly larger sensor (my last camera was a Samsung NX series APS-C). If I had to make the decision today - I might actually buy the Fuji. I rarely use the G9's stabilization for video work because I'm usually on a tripod - so that feature isn't a huge "need" for me anymore. As I said before - I actually prefer the look of Fuji images - especially B&W (although the G9's new monochrome D mode is fantastic) and I really like the indie way in which Fuji produces their cameras and lenses. Can't really go wrong with most cameras now-a-days - they are all just too darned good....
I wish reviewers would do more low light tests. My X-T20 also takes amazing shots... in bright light. But take it to an indoor party or shooting kids indoors and it struggles to focus. I know the X-T3 is faster than my camera, but I've heard it shares some low light focusing problems as well. It's a mirrorless shortcoming I believe.
It's true that many mirrorless bodies aren't as confident in low light, though the latest a7 bodies from Sony are pretty good, and the new Canon EOS R is actually excellent in this regard. The X-T3 does slow down in really low light, but I've actually had very few focus issues.
I admire the XT3 but it's behind the rest on dynamic range. But with a great lens lineup and Capture One this is a good travel camera. I don't think IBIS is too much of an issue, I'll stick with FF for now though.
@@DustinAbbottTWI for stills, 12 stops vs 14.6 stops of the Nikon D7200 seems like a big enough margin when trying to retain detail in shots that need some recovery and that's just comparing against another APSC that's older.
May I ask what lens/focal length you are using to shoot your self in this review. Also which camera please? and thank you for this very detailed review. I just love Fuji's style physically for their camera with the tactile feel they offer for their cameras and that honest and natural color science, all within using their APSC sized sensor they don't feel they need to change to anything bigger unless its medium format. Gotta love that confidence.
A hint - I always include the information you are looking for at the end of videos. In this case it is the Sony a7R3 + the Voigtländer 65mm F2. I often use MF lenses for these segments as I prefocus before stepping in front of the camera and don't have to worry about focus shifting.
I started shooting on an aps c then fell in love with shooting on a mft now only shoot full frame sony cameras. Since you can shoot anything, what is the payoff or benefit for some one like me who shoots landscapes and nature primarily with aps c? Other than fugi is such an awesome product, just in terms of form factor? brrr, are you warm now?
At the moment if I could have only one camera, I probably would go Sony a7R3. I have a number of cameras, though, and I'm strongly considering adding the X-T3 to my own kit.
IBIS works on all my lenses, including a number of manual focus lenses that I own (and it makes a big difference in the manual focus process, particularly when magnifying the image to visually focus). I would rather accept a stop less of stability on one given lens (assuming that lens-based OIS would be that much better, which I'm not sure it is), and get stabilization on all my lenses as a tradeoff.
I'm sorry, Daniel, but I completely disagree. There are all kinds of practical applications for IBIS in every day shooting, and it applies to all lenses.
I love the retro design, having grown up shooting fully manual cameras, that is, even before autofocus, the control by top plate dial in fact appeals. Also, Fuji, unlike Sony, the camera comes with the choice of a wide array of high-quality native glass. Also, I must be about the only person who does not have any real interest in IBIS/OSS etc. With the mega high ISO's all modern cameras are capable of, camera shake should not be a problem, except in situations when maybe you should be using a tripod.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Some users and reviewers treat IBIS/OSS etc as though it is a deal-breaker in lens comparisons. Justin, in past times you have coped without it - I did, taking perhaps the best pictures using an OM2, purchased for AU$60 from a pawnshop, and using the mega fast Kodachrome slide film, ASA 64 - not 32,000.
Thank you for another great set of reviews. I had the XPro1 and XT1 camera bodies and loved them and the out of camera images but there was no good editing software at the time. Sold the bodies and kept the lenses in the hope Adobe or Capture1 would catch up. Adobe still sucks even though they will tell you differently. Capture1, 12 is fantastic. I borrowed an XH1 and used my lenses for two weeks at the flower festival and I am going to purchase new Fuji bodies as soon as the replacement for the XH1 arrives.
Dustin Abbott Hey Dustin as usual you are completely correct APS-C stands for APS-classic. I don’t know why I thought the C meant Canon. Probably on a Nikon full frame forum ;-). Thanks again for your great reviews. Happy New Year.
That's seriously tough. They are both extremely competent cameras. I use need the extra dynamic range and shoot a lot at high ISOs, go a73. If you don't, and prefer your lenses to be smaller and lighter, go Fuji.
If all this tech is important to you then I would suggest you need to work on composition and story telling. The differences here discussed are so esoteric I often wonder what sort of images the techies are actually taking. I once went to a show in NYC where some famous photographer had a showing of images taken with a home-made pin hole camera. They were still great images that captured the viewer. I’m an old guy who learned film photography and love the fujis because of the aesthetics of the design and the film simulations. I set a film sim as I would pick a specific film and go with it. While I don’t judge those who like to spend hours with an image on a computer, I prefer to capture as much as possible in-camera and that includes mood, color saturation, grain, composition, etc. In fact, all the post I do is some minor cropping. For me this makes photography more immediate and emphasizes that moment when the image is captured. I’m also a musician who has done studio sessions. An engineer can bring drum beats back into the perfect quarter-note measure and bring a singer back to perfect pitch. As far as I’m concerned that’s bullshit art. But each to his/her/whatever own.
Photography has always been both tech and art. If you can take great pictures with a pinhole, this is gonna do better. Light room is just digital darkroom. Great photographers don't just pick a film, shoot, crop and calls it a great photo. They go as far as using specific paper and printer.
Excellent technical specification review .. I’m curious however Dustin, how do you “feel” when it’s in the hand and when operating the Fuji with it’s more tactile controls? I am Interested in the more intangible impression you have of it
I've got a Jupiter 9 with M42 mount. I enjoy adapting M42 lenses to my Fujifilm cameras so much that I have multiple M42-FX adapters. Focus peaking on the X-T2 and X-T3 helps make focus precise even at wide open apertures.
Hi dustin, thanks for the review. Now that fuji x-t3 has same af-speed as x-t4 with fw 4.0 has this changed your opinion on the camera? I also wonder if the focus limiter is useful in real usage. I currently have the x-t2 and xf 35 f2 for family shooting. thinking of upgrading to x-t3 (which costs about 800 used from a individual) cant decide yet haha
The firmware updates have helped, though some focus features are still not at Canon or Sony levels. But I do think the X-T3 is very strong value at that price point.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Hi Dustin, thank you for your quick reply. I think canon and sony are hard to beat. Though I think Fuji is doing well for being such a small company. Value seems good indeed. I might pounce on one :) Ps: have you tried the 3d tracking mode on the x-t4 / x-t3? (c-af + wide tracking mode). I tried it in a store and seems quite sticky.
Hi Dustin. Thanks for the information. I am pretty new to DSLR and mirrorless photography. I have been studying the basics such as manual mode, aperture, shutter speed and iso and bought some books. I have some money saved up to buy a nice camera and I have been studying both mirrorless and dslr. The two cameras I really like are the Fuji Xt3 for mirrorless and the Nikon D850 for DSLR. I know the Fuji is a lot cheaper, lighter and seems amazing. I was wondering your take on what you would decide for what reasons if you have time. Thanks so much.
Wow - that's not really a direct comparison. My best recommendation is that you look over the lenses you would like to have/use, and see which complete system (camera/lens/accessories) best suits your purpose. Both systems have great strengths.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks so much for responding. I will take some time and not rush it. I have been researching mirrorless vs. DSLR. I have a cheaper Nikon a bought a while back that is plenty good so I don't need to rush. I just love looking at this stuff and I got some money saved up that I am going to use for a new camera when I figure out what I want. I do like the Nikon D850 from what I have seen and also this Fuji xt-3. Thanks again.
Excellent review Dustin, thank you. Visiting this in light of the pending XT-4 and it's specs... seems like Fuji watched this review as well. Curious if you have found some video coloring options (Eterna etc.) useful compared to Sony's? I'm probably still veering toward a used A7RIII then a used A7IV following. The EOS R5 would probably be my choice here soon but imagine that will come with a near $4k asking price. Outstanding job Brother, thanks again.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks for your thoughts Dustin... I sure wish it had a vari-tilt screen, it really is the one major drawback to the Sony's... and the lack of touchscreen functionality. I rented an A7III 6 months ago just to rule it out, lol, and found that I loved it, aside from the LCD Resolution which is why I would get the A7RIII primarily. Thanks again.
Full frame will always be cleaner. Bigger sensor always wins. It all depends on what you shoot. Canon full frame is great at high iso. It more fun to shoot with than canon though.
Thank you for posting this! Really good video! I’m having a problem with both my X-T3 & X-H1 for monitoring audio. I have a SmallHD 5” external monitor that I really like but when I plug it in via HDMI, my audio stops monitoring from the camera, the recording still has audio, but I can’t hear anything. I guess the camera thinks I’m monitoring the audio through the HDMI output but it’s really annoying. Is there any trick we can do to avoid the camera to shut down the audio monitor jack while using a external monitor? Thank you!
Thanks for the great review! I’m thinking about buying the camera even though I already invested in the Sony. What compact all around lens would you recommend for this camera that is small, light, and very sharp? Thanks for your help. Johnny
I've used very few Fuji lenses so far, though I do really like the 35mm F2 (I'll be releasing coverage of it soon). I've heard good things about the kit lens, actually, though I haven't used it yet.
That's true for video, Steve, but that's assuming that this is the major purpose of IBIS. I don't view it that way. It helps eliminate camera shake from portrait shots (at shutter speeds like 1/100th-1/200th, allows you flexibility for shooting shots with the shutter dragging a bit, and, perhaps most important to me, makes it much easier to fine tune focus manually because the magnified image in the viewfinder or LCD isn't jumping all over the place.
Great review as usual Dustin. Just wanted to comment on your findings with the video autofocus as I own an XT3 and use it extensively for video. I've never found that the autofocus in video is "stepping" and actually have found it to be quite smooth actually, something similar to Sony's video autofocus system. Is the sample footage you provided in this review actual footage taken with your copy of the XT3? Or were you recording the screen using an external monitor? I've seen other reviewers have the same findings as you with video autofocus but it was apparent that they were just recording the screen and not actually recording footage, which is where I think this discrepancy occurs.
That was footage from the X-T3 (the one I was using) and the XF 35mm F2. I found a similar performance with the 200mm F2. The best performance in this area comes from Canon's DPAF.
Really like the xt3 but I don't feel the AF is as good as some say, I say this having done side by side tests with an a7riii & 85 1.4 and an xt3 & 56 1.2. I was outside the camera shop shooting pedestrians walking left to right in AF-C and the hit rate was 80% Sony and 30% Fuji. (Not sure if this could be addressed in a firmware update). Aware that the focus speed of the lenses could be a factor here and I find it strange, (having seen many posts on this), that faster aperture and more expensive Fuji lenses tend to be slower focusing than the slower versions, I can't think of any of manufacture who's lense line-up is similar.
That doesn’t sound like my experience at all, though I haven’t used that lens. My hit rate was extremely high with the Fuji, though the same is true if the Sony with most lenses
i agree so much, Fuji and maybe pentax are the only one that actually worked the ass off to make good apsc lenses. good IQ, good build and elegant (except for pentax). Nevertheless, i'm not a fan of the small grip and short battery life, bad wireless connectivity and the lack of fully articulated screen, so it is a no go for me but i should never say never ;)
Your shot is tilted to the left! Just teasing :) I really like your reviews. Find them detailed and not biased towards any manufacturer. Keep up the good work! And I'm really happy that you are reviewing other brands than Canon and Sony now. And about that camera - I like it a lot! The only thing that stops me from pulling the trigger on a Christmas gift for myself, is the price of the lenses. There are a lot of 3rd party lenses for bigger companies' cameras, which pulls the price down. Not Fuji, unfortunately.
Hi. Thank you Dustin. I have two questions I am looking at multiple brands review videos to answer. I like the T3 and T2 price entry points upgrading from my 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor bridge camera for wildlife and landscape. Can you use X-T2 or X-T3 tracking to lock on subjects while they are in motion and then have them tracked, for example capturing a flock of birds or one large bird (like a Heron) flying towards you and clicking multiple frames per second, or capturing them in video and maintaining focus while the flock or bird changes direction suddenly? Also, for video, will an OIS lens on a tripod in a ~20mph wind make up for the minor tripod vibration that drives me nuts (or should I admit at this point I need a gimbal)? Any help is a blessing. Thanks!
Hi - I would recommend that you look at my review of the 200mm F2 Fujinon lens to see what the X-T3 is capable of for tracking (it's impressive with good glass!). As for your second question - I haven't really tested that kind of situation. A gimbal to me is pretty much a must if you want seriously good footage, and they've gotten more reasonable.
Just a great review. IBIS isn't a huge priority for me, but I'm wondering about the size and weight of some of the larger, faster lenses. Do they overpower the body? Would it be better with a battery grip?
I'd really recommend the grip. It's really nice to have 3 batteries loaded up, and the camera feels pretty small in my bigger hands. The only lens that I've seen that has a lot of weight is the 200 f2. Everything else is a lot smaller than Nikon / Canon glass
@@TheErikBallew I'm using my XT3 with a canon adapter with the sigma 18-35 (pretty heavy and big lens) and it would be hard to use without the grip (alternative options could be a smallrig cage which i want to buy too ;))
I doubt they will ever add ibis to the xt line. They've stated they have to comprise to much with the size. That's why they developed the xh1 which is basicly a xt2 with ibis and slightly bigger body. I'm sure they will have an xh2 next year that will have ibis with all the new features of the xt3.
I think you're probably right, but moo is right, too: Sony manages to put IBIS and similar performance into the a6500, which is actually a bit smaller.
I'm getting just as good and often BETTER results with the Fuji xt2 and their lower quality lenses than I do with a 3500K full frame with top of the line lenses, at least on the color and sensor side of things!! Less noise, excellent color that doesn't need to be adjusted to no end, and some kind of intangible quality, which I can not fully describe... a more delicate, ethereal vibe to the pictures that look less like digital files and more like Slides ...
I’m a Fuji newbie with the XT3 ....shoot raw on to one card ..jpeg the other . Not impressed as others seem to be with noise , even as low , as 800 I S O and always have to deal with that on any raw I choose to keep .
People wanting Full Frame have completely missed the point of this system. Fuji is actually interested in and capable of giving APS-C shooters incredible quality and performance in a smaller package, unlike Canon who uses lens gimmicks and marketing tactics to drive APS-C shooters to their Full Frame (read: more expensive) options.
I am very interested in buying this camera buy also i am very interested in shooting the milky way.. Could someone talk about the performanceI of the x-t3 in shooting the galaxy? Perhaps @Dustin Abbott could you try it please and share your opinion? Thank you very much.
It works fine for shooting astro. The lens will have more to do with that than anything. The sensor is still fairly clean at ISO 3200 (and ISO 6400 with a bit more noise), so if you can shoot a lens that works well within those constraints, I think you will get great results.
Strange how Cartier-Bresson, Winogrand, Weston, Strand, Evans, Arbus, Salgado, etc, etc didn't need Ibis... alternatively use a thing called a tripod which photographers have been using for 150 years, or, more radically, try learning how to take a photo using both hands.
Let me offer a counter argument: If they could have had IBIS, do you think they would have disdained it? Making the argument that photographers did without is - to me - irrelevant. So have I most of my career as a photographer. But the fact of that matter is that now I don't, and rival camera makers do offer it, and it does make a difference.
Dustin, I suspect they would have little concern for trying to shoot at two seconds hand-held. Apart from anything else they were not afraid to have soft, often blurry images. They understood blurry images can lend a sense of movement and dynamisim to a typical street scene. In fact I would argue many of the greatest photographs ever taken are 'soft' by contemporary standards, with low dynamic range taken at medium apertures. The current obsession with super-sharp glass, razor-sharp bokeh and HDR is the product of commercial marketing, technology driven product reviews and far too many wedding photographers on RUclips who frankly are mainly concerned with dumb spec-sheets than understanding the poetry of an image.
It's just nice to have and offers some flexibility when a tripod isn't handy or is too cumbersome for the situation. As long as the lens has image stabilization, I'm fine with that.
I don't think that the importance of IBIS is trying to handhold two second exposures. I view the value more as eliminating motion blur from camera shake from a portrait at, say, 1/125th second.
Fuji probably has not given IBIS because it wants one to invest in its stabilized lenses. I was looking for a possible increment to A6500 but without IBIS no. Also I have too many manual lenses. And IBIS also makes it possible to do certain videos using very slow hand movements. These cannot be done without a tripod as one would never be able to minutely move it the way one moves ones hands. The same with photographic macro work. For those who say its not important as we did without it earlier, then just stop watching these videos as we did without internet earlier. I also do not care for the retro look. I worked too long on SLRs and now love the compact minimal body that one can customize. I think the difference between the different camera companies is in their systems. Fuji has created a kind of 'designer' style and specialization of the aps-c sensor size and with it specialty lenses. Thereby drawing the most out of the sensor size and therefore not needing a full frame.
They dont have many lenses that are well stabilized. Also, IBIS works to add more stabilization on top of stabilization coming from the lens, the lens or IBIS do not cancel one or the other out. Selling stabilized lenses is not the reason.
Great review! While I doubt I will ever own this camera it does (or should) provide a ton of pressure on Sony, and especially Canon since this comes in about $800 less then their R. And while I cannot believe I am even considering it, I've been looking at the Fuji GFX 50R somewhat seriously. Now I'm not going to order it tonight, or probably any time next year (but then again, who knows. Life sometimes finds a way.) but would love to learn more about it. Ever consider talking to someone over there and see if you can get a loaner to try out for a few weeks? :)
@@terjeaudio4308 Ummm, have you looked at my portfolio? www.flickr.com/photos/thousandwordimages/ | I'm not exactly a novice with a camera. Yes, I've taken a lot of great photos without IBIS, but it is far more than just a crutch for lazy photographers.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Dustin, no point explaining. For me, IBIS is a necessity for video work. the video capability is the differentiator for this camera and Fuji didn't include IBIS. for stills, the XT2 is still a great option for Fuji system. I have been with fuji from XE1 days. And then most of the older XF lens are not that great for AFC/Video AF. I have about 4 of them. So, in order to use the video, you'll have to invest on the current lens. Since Fuji was relatively new, shouldn't they developed their XF lens system to be video ready from day one? Another issue with Fuji is their X camera value depreciates pretty fast. one of my criteria is resale value, especially with digital camera because the upgrade/replacement cycle is short due to tech obsolesce unlike film cameras. Fuji themselves de-values their camera by offering cashbacks/discounts. Just check the XH1, they started giving discounts and cashbacks a month after release. I see the same for XT3...
That's just not true, at all. All shooters should be using lower light situations, like at dusk and dawn, if they actually want to achieve truly beautiful imagery. Ah, you did say regular shooters, so yeah, they are regular.
Probably A7III. I like the footage straight out of Sony's better for video work and also Fuji hasn't yet eliminated the 4GB limitation, which means that I don't reach for the X-T3 for video work even though it's a very capable camera. That might change if I had more lenses for the X-T3 too. At the moment I've got access to so much more Sony glass, so don't read too much into my personal feelings.
@@DustinAbbottTWI There were reports about import issues, and images appearing softer compared to capture 1. But after seeing your iso comparison video, i dont think that its is an issue with the xt3
The best way to see if this camera is for you is to rent it for a weekend. You will notice if the auto focus has improved enough for you for example, and so forth..
You can't compare XT3 with cameras outside of its price range... How flexible is the RAW coming out of this camera? Does it worth to invest in it for professional photography?
@moo Thanks for your answer :) I work with xt2 for the last 2 years and it is a very good all around camera for its price range especially. I hope we will see something better from canon before 2020, that worths investing in Canons mirrorless.
U don't need to apologize for that "slip-of-the-tongue" 'cos U reviewed many cameras and lenses that it's clear U know the matter U'r talking in Ur videos and besides it's obvious that it's not a rangefinder, just lookin' at the camera as anyone is able to do.
The whole no IBIS thing is overblown. It does have it's merits, I agree. I would like to stabalize my xf90mm, sure. It's definitely not a deal breaker though, especially on a $1500 body. For real video work, you need a gimbal. For proper stabilization, you need a tripod. Do I miss shots because I don't have IBIS, yes, a few... And on the whole, it's not a big deal. And the battery life? Come on guys, put an extra battery in your pocket. They are small. Every camera is a compromise. Pick the one that works best for your needs and just go out and have fun.
It’s more of a big deal because competitors have it, which means I need to talk about it. I hit the EOS R for the same reason
@@DustinAbbottTWI I agree with you, Dustin.. And the argument will make a lot of sense when Sony releases their a6500 successor with IBIS for similar money.
It'll be called an X-H2. All in the plan.
@Phil Jones65 I guess the XH2 will solve that problem for you. I shoot mainly portraits so IBIS is fairly irrelevant for me in most cases as I don't like to shoot below 1/60. IBIS would definitely be nice for the XF90 though. I do see the merits in certain low light applications like architecture/product photography.
@Phil Jones65 yep, good points. Difficult choices. Compromises with any choice. Enjoy what you have is the big takeaway :)
I take delight in my X-T3 and every Fuji lens I own, I find that it to be a tool that inspires creativity. Just look at the features - max. shutter speed, focus peaking, stacking, film simulations. I can use it for portraits, macro and any other unusual scenario. My gripes are small, for example I don’t like that it does not show the actual ISO beforehand when auto ISO mode is active, it only shows the maximum. I also really like the grip, so I can use the camera like a larger pro body with plenty battery life, or a discreet unit with a small footprint coupled with fantastic small sized lenses that can travel everywhere.
That's a pretty good summation.
Sydney_Image I think it is might be because I am using back button focus using AF-L, and only use the shutter button for capturing. I am not absolutely sure if there is any menu option that can change this behavior, but I doubt it.
Can you please recommend good general purpose, OIS lens, for X-T3?
Sydney_Image I agree, I got one with an X-T20 and when I traded the camera in for the X-T3 I decided to keep the lens. It is my only Fuji zoom lens, and I highly rate it.
@@sydneyimage1874 Tnx. What about primes? 23/35 mm f/1.4 or f/2?
I am a Canon DSLR shooter but I brought the X-T3 as an all round travel camera and i absolutely love it. I just got back from a week in Cuba with my X-T3 and only 1 lens (23mm f2) Its a wicket system.
I'm about to take one on a trip, too.
Dustin, you are the epitome of Canadian politeness, a true gentleman
Thank you. Ironically I only became a Canadian citizen this week. I'm actually American by birth.
Mr. Abbott, very interesting! I have seriously contemplated living in Canada as well, it would be great to hear more about your life story sometime
Congratulatons @@DustinAbbottTWI! It seems it hasn't been so easy to get the citizenship!
Fuji I LOVE your flip SCREEN concept! They have in my opinion the best flip screen arrangement on the marked. Makes high/low photo a breeze compared to the Panny/Oly/Canon idea where you have to flip it all the way out before rotating etc which makes you miss the moment. 100% cudos to Fuji here. This vlogging-thingy is just for a few users compared to the large amount of photographers out there.
Aww I am, I don't know what happened in the previous video, but don't apologize, you won our hearts why saying this word. Love from Atlantic province.
Thanks!
Got XT3 and A7RIII among my cameras. XT3 is great, will go on all vacations with me. Autofocus tracking is brilliant and in my opinion at the top 3 of mirrorless world. Nice review Dustin. Now you need to review Nikon Z6 next.
It's an excellent camera. I probably won't cover the Nikon, as I don't review Nikons generally. I only have so much time.
I have never thought there will be 1 person , nowadays, saying an apsc camera is of a good use. Or the best of its own. What a review ! ✌
What can i say? It's a good camera.
Even though I'm using Sony A7m3, but I'm always the fan of Fuji. They make cameras and lenses that people want to use . Hybrid RF shooting experiences like X-Pro series, beautiful, classic Fujinon lenses... I appreciate Sony's pragmatic approach, but I really love the nostalgic value of Fuji.
Nostalgic is a good word, and I think you've summed up the nature of the experience well.
I'm right there with you! I have an A7iii and will always respect what Fuji does. I have been very tempted to switch to them but can't justify it lol
Same. I've got the A7riii, but the XT3 is absolutely beautiful. I'd love to get one to replace the a6000 I always carry for street photography. It'll have to wait though.
I’m on the same boat as you. I use a Sony a7iii with GM lenses for my wedding work. I also have the Fuji XE-3 for fun with a couple of nice primes. Tempted to get a second hand xt2 or even a new xt3 to try out for some of my engagement & family sessions. For a wedding, I love the continuous eye auto focus of the a7iii. Once the Fuji system gets to that level, then I’ll consider it for wedding work. Great review Mr. Abbot.
What people will complain about today! My first camera was a Pentax 1000. I don't remember it being a Rangefinder. For me a Rangefinder is a NOT through the lenses camera viewer, but I could be incorrect. I love my X-T2 and hope to someday purchase a X-T3. Thanks for your work and review Mr Abbott.
You're welcome. I got hammered over that slip dozens of times.
I have been shooting with XT-2 for two years. I recently bought an XT-3 so I could have two bodies. There is not a huge difference. I like them both.
X-T3 (previously X-T2) made me move from Canon (not particularly any flaw of Canon 5D MIV) and become Fuji exclusive (X-T3 primary and GFX-50S as special purpose). Primarily their menu system + retro look + physical controls + out of camera JPEG (saves tons of time for me).
IBIS is not necessarily a MUST for a photographer (for vlogger it's a different issue altogether, in that case I'd advise to get a video cam) unless you are shooting in a cave (some street photography does demand extreme low light and hence stable hands) or no access to OIS lenses.
Fuji is doing a great job, probably making many take a leap into their GFX system (lack of FF)
I'm definitely going to be testing some of the GFX stuff in the future.
@@DustinAbbottTWI awesome, I am keen to know the long exposure and flash photography (Their fuji ef x500 works great on HSS above 1/125 - tested 1/500 so far).
All the best. It's a beast of the camera, takes a while to make changes to your workflow and it' definitely not a video featured camera (personally, I like the fact that there is no much video things packed in it)
I disagree about the IBIS. It's not just a low light and video feature. Shooting stationary wildlife with long lenses could be better if there was a decent body with IBIS for it. Sadly there isn't. MFT is unacceptably noisy, Sony's telephotos cost an arm and a leg, Nikon and Canon don't have IBIS. Neither does this Fuji, for no reason at all.
I came over from Canon full-frame to the X-T3 and I am very pleased so far. The video quality of the Fuji is outstanding, right out of the box. The still image quality is excellent. I tried the Sony A7III and although it's a good camera, I was never that happy with it, so sold it. The Fuji is a photographer's camera, one that inspires and makes me think about what I'm doing. In addition, the system has a great lineup of affordable, high quality lenses that make it a great choice for a variety of shooting situations.
It's a solid choice for sure.
For me APS-C is the sweet spot sensor size. The balance between size and quality is just perfect.
Glad it works for you.
I got the x-t3 as my first camera and i really Love the physical dials but i hate the Ergonomics. The x-h1 has pretty much perfect economics but it lacks the features for the same price... I'll get a cheap grip for it and hope it will improve the Ergonomics 👌
Look at my text review. The McoPlus one makes a big difference.
@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks very much Dustin, that grip is not available yet in Germany unfortunately.
Thanks Dustin! I just picked up the x-t3, and look forward to using it for my RUclips channel.
Enjoy. Just watch for some potential hunting when shooting static shots of you on camera. You'll have to be careful to minimize that, as this is a Fuji weakness.
@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you. All of my videos are "talking head" videos of myself. The xt3 might have trouble with even those? Should I just set the camera in manual focus? Thanks again!
Just experiment with it. I haven't had "talking head" success with Fuji, but maybe your experience will be different. Otherwise, yes, MF is the best option.
@@DustinAbbottTWI great - thanks!
I own both Sony A9 and XT3, I love XT3 for its light weight and performance, the classic dials, and beautiful body design is also one of the reason people choose XT3 anyway :P My A9 and GM lenses are great but heavy, XT3 is my almost perfect traveling camera, the only thing I hope is FUJI will put IBIS on the next XT camera. I like to travel light and I’m so lazy don’t even want to travel with tripod these days. :P IBIS helps a lot at handheld low light situation and expand more possibilities for travelers. I prefer my XF1855mm kit over XF1655F2.8 because the OIS is really useful. I bought XF1855mm and XF50140mm which covers my traveling use, I will consider invest more on FUJI once the next XT camera gets IBIS. :)
I'm hoping they aren't reserving that for the XH-2 only.
You can also use your phone to control the camera. Start/Stop and focus. This works pretty good for framing yourself, and starting and stopping recording.
That's true of most of these cameras, though whether or not you can do video controls does vary.
I think you should get to the XH series for IBIS. asking IBIS for XT series is like asking Sony to put ibis on A63XX when they specifically placed it the A65XX series. just my 2 cents
I'll concede your first point, but your second is incorrect. I fully anticipate that IBIS will be in future Sony APS-C mirrorless bodies - not just the a6500. It was a step forward for the series, not so much a way of distinguishing a new line.
Thanks mate, good wrap up.
I still use my XE1 & XT1,really enjoy both of them.
The XT3 will come down the line I'm sure.
It's a pretty major upgrade, so I think you'll enjoy it.
There's something especially lovely about the X-E1's sensor, which I believe it shares with the X-Pro1 and X100S. This is the main reason I still use the X-E1 as a travel camera when I have no need for using adapted lenses, as focus peaking doesn't work especially well with that camera. Also love the form factor.
Apart from the previous comment its the H.265 codec that interests me in the Fuji video features. I used the codec with the older Samsung 4k and file sizes and battery usage is far less - thereby less possibility of over heating.
It’s surprisingly robust in terms of video options.
@@DustinAbbottTWI It has to be - sony a6500 was released in Dec 1016. And it is now much cheaper in terms of direct competition. And with ibis. So they have to provide something incremental before sony's next update. Also more native sigma lenses for sony - cheaper too.
Thanks for the review, Dustin. I must say, I never had a bad photo when I was using the XT-2. So, it appears this might be a great backup to my a7riii as an around town camera, for casual use.
Sounds like a plan. I'm strongly considering one as a replacement for my a6500.
Great camera, and as you've pointed out, it's part of the only serious dedicated aps-c system in the market. I've got the x-t2 with the "kit" lens, 16mm, 56mm and 100-400mm. I'll wait for the x-h2 instead, hoping that they'll bring bigger batteries and I need the extra grip especially for the 100-400mm.
I watch you for the last 2-3 years, you're one of the most serious and reliable reviewers out there. Don't mind the subs, there isn't any justice in our universe anyway. Keep up the good work!
I'm also interested in the X-H2 as a potential camera. I'm really debating whether or not to take the plunge on the X-T3 or wait for it.
AFAIk you've already got Sony and Canon gear so...well, you know better. I'm a Fuji shooter mostly and have this x-t2 for 1,5 year now but I want to get out some more thousand clicks before I change. When I do, I really hope the battery is bigger because as you well know, this is the Achilles heel of this system. The bigger grip and the IBIS that x-h2 will offer are certainly nice bonuses.
Great colors in your photos. You have an eye for pleasing colors and composition.
Thank you.
Another great review Dustin...the XT-3 looks to be a good value, and fantastic camera! You take some awesome photos btw :-)
Thank you very much
Thank you for your review, Dustin and merry Christmas, very beautiful decoration out there at your house.
Thank you very much. Merry Christmas to you, too.
Thank you. I shall notice, that the old-school physical dials and switches have a caveat. They may not be controlled by custom settings profiles. For example, when I switch to timelapse shooting profile, a score of non standard settings are automatically applied (M mode, MF, single-shot, 16:9, F/16 etc). My Panasonic LX100 has manual controls for aperture and aspect ratio (!!!), therefore I still need to adjust them manually back and forth even after applying the settings profile. Also I heavily rely on presets (involving aperture, drive mode, AF mode etc) in daily shooting, so the old-school controls are less than optimal. I've just purchased the third body - A6300 as a companion to A7III.
Everyone has a layout that suits them best. Use what works for you
Yeah, that is a downside. I like the physical controls in slow paced situations where I go through every setting anyways, but I also like the automatic stuff like resetting the exposure compensation to 0 everytime you turn on the camera or custom settings which is possible with the more usual digital camera conntrols.
Thank you Mr Abbott
Hi Dustin Thank you for your review this is why i did buy one 1week ago and FWI Fuji delivers all Cameras factory Settings in Energy saving Mode this is also hindering auto Focus to work properly, to change that under: Settings/ Powermanagment/PERFORMANCE /Boost Just wanna let you know cheers
I use mine in normal mode. I rarely go into performance mode as it seems unnecessary
you dont have to only control the camera using the physical controls on the top of the body, you can use the front and back wheels to set your ISO and shutter speed. Moving from a Canon 5d M3, it's actually as easy to use.
I use a combination, personally. I like having the options for how to control the camera, for sure.
Excellent review as always. I agree that ibis is the only thing lacking.
Thanks for the feedback.
Hi Dustin, thanks for all your reviews!! I'm an amateur apsc still shooter, not interested in full frame and not doing any video work. I'm considering switching to Fuji system. Is it a good move for me in your opinion? (considering sony is about to release its new apsc camera) thanks a lot!
That depends on how invested you are in Sony. The X-T3 sounds like a good fit for what you want to do.
Actually I agree with your "rangefinder design". I would say the X-H1 is the "non rangefinder design" or "DSLR like design"
Thanks for the great video !
Rangefinder was mostly incorrect to say due to the actual way they work.
oh, I was thinking of the aesthetics rather than the operation. As Fuji choose to use the dedicated-dials approach compared to other mainstream designs....
And that's what I was originally saying, but I got hammered for that.
@@DustinAbbottTWI exactly. Seems like we have to choose words carefully. But I have to say, I agree with the rangefinder statement. Merry Xmas !
Thank you for all your fantastic reviews! I've had a few Fujis, & they just inspire shooting! :)
My pleasure.
Great review
Thanks
Another very comprehensive review, thanks Dustin. Nothing controversial here at all ;)
Were it not for a fairly extensive investment in Sony kit, I would jump onto the Fujifilm bandwagon without any regrets, other than the X-T3's lack of IBIS. (It worked extremely well on the X-H1 that I tried for a few days). Their dedicated APS-C lenses are enviable and the retro look with manual controls is very desirable.
Exactly. I'm debating whether or not to replace my a6500 with that...or to wait to see if a successor to the X-H1 comes soon.
Dustin Abbott I think this system will compliment my Canon Mark IV. And use the T3 for travel and street photography.
Thanks for the comprehensive and thorough review on the X-T3. Looking to downsize on weight over my Canon 5d mk iii and glass for travel and journalism work. This is the system to go to. The Fuji glass looks excellent. No IBIS? No biggie. I guess I'm old school, learned how to steady hand held back in the day when I had my first Nikkormat and used "high speed" Kodak Tri-X 400 ASA for low light and action.
You can definitely survive without IBIS (all of us had until a couple of years ago). I make a big deal out of that mostly because some competitors do offer it.
I have also made the same exact switch, even if i did keep some of my Canon gear. The XT3 is soo fun to use, it feels like going back to my old Canon AT-1 in terms of controls. But the retro feel is a good camouflage because its really a high tech camera with all the features I need and even more. And one more thing, the lenses.... Even the pancake lens (27mm 2.8) is fantastic, maybe because you dont have the issue with back/front focus like on the DSLR. Autofocus is great and the eye detect system, i will never ever go back again. One thing though, I have been a primary RAW shooter with the Canon, but the Fuji Jpg straight out of camera is so good that i now, often use only JPG and have RAW on the second card just in case. IBIS, would have been nice, but with stabilized lenses its not that big of a problem.
What’s the difference between the native and expanded ISO and why don’t you like to shoot in expanded ISO?
Expanded ISO is essentially the equivalent of digital zoom. It is using electronics to artificially produce more "ISO", but typically comes at the cost of dramatically diminishing returns.
Akk the review seem to say if you don't like physical controls it might not be for you....I have mine setup EXACTLY like I did my D800 and other cameras with just the wheels and NEVER use the dials. You don't HAVE to use them its just more options.
Yes, but I would argue that it is far more compelling to have those controls if you actually prefer them.
As for vid footage and color, you may have a look at Kevin Mullins videos, they have recently been filmed on an X-T3, and I think it's color and general quality is sublime... Others have said that too. Maybe it is a thing of fine tuning the settings...
Hi Bernhard, I'm not familiar with Kevin, but there's a good chance he is grading the footage in post. You can get great footage out of any of these cameras with LOG if you do grading in post. I pump out 2-3 videos per week, however, and don't have the time to do a lot of grading of my footage most of the time. I use it right out of camera.
I kept going back and forth between this XT3 and the Panasonic G9 - I ended up buying the G9 with the Leica 12-60 - for two reasons: High Resolution Mode (for studio photography) and IBIS. I'm starting to think this camera would be a much better choice for street photos - or any photos that would require a quick touch. I love the flip out screen on my G9 - but for fast street type shots - it's a little slow to fold out. I also think Fuji color science is top notch. Guess I'll be saving my coins and buy this as a second camera - lol. Nice review!! Thanks!
It's tough to decide what to buy. No system is perfect, so you have to be realistic about what your needs are and buy accordingly.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Exactly. I sat down and wrote down precisely what I needed a new camera for (Macro photography of my personal jewelry work and for making RUclips videos of me producing said work) and at the end of the day - the Panasonic G9 won out with it's excellent video, flip around screen, high resolution mode and a few other image stacking features. I still think the fuji system is amazing and I kind of miss having a slightly larger sensor (my last camera was a Samsung NX series APS-C). If I had to make the decision today - I might actually buy the Fuji. I rarely use the G9's stabilization for video work because I'm usually on a tripod - so that feature isn't a huge "need" for me anymore. As I said before - I actually prefer the look of Fuji images - especially B&W (although the G9's new monochrome D mode is fantastic) and I really like the indie way in which Fuji produces their cameras and lenses. Can't really go wrong with most cameras now-a-days - they are all just too darned good....
I wish reviewers would do more low light tests. My X-T20 also takes amazing shots... in bright light. But take it to an indoor party or shooting kids indoors and it struggles to focus. I know the X-T3 is faster than my camera, but I've heard it shares some low light focusing problems as well. It's a mirrorless shortcoming I believe.
It's true that many mirrorless bodies aren't as confident in low light, though the latest a7 bodies from Sony are pretty good, and the new Canon EOS R is actually excellent in this regard. The X-T3 does slow down in really low light, but I've actually had very few focus issues.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Good to know, thanks!
I admire the XT3 but it's behind the rest on dynamic range. But with a great lens lineup and Capture One this is a good travel camera. I don't think IBIS is too much of an issue, I'll stick with FF for now though.
That margin isn’t huge, though. It’s very capable.
@@DustinAbbottTWI for stills, 12 stops vs 14.6 stops of the Nikon D7200 seems like a big enough margin when trying to retain detail in shots that need some recovery and that's just comparing against another APSC that's older.
Thank you for the gread review! Loved the animal shots! Which lens did you use?
Okay 5 seconds after I wrote the comment I saw :)
I used basically the best option Fuji has for those images.
May I ask what lens/focal length you are using to shoot your self in this review. Also which camera please? and thank you for this very detailed review. I just love Fuji's style physically for their camera with the tactile feel they offer for their cameras and that honest and natural color science, all within using their APSC sized sensor they don't feel they need to change to anything bigger unless its medium format. Gotta love that confidence.
A hint - I always include the information you are looking for at the end of videos. In this case it is the Sony a7R3 + the Voigtländer 65mm F2. I often use MF lenses for these segments as I prefocus before stepping in front of the camera and don't have to worry about focus shifting.
I must of missed that sorry but thank you for the info Mr.Abbot. Keep up the great work. Take care sir.
I started shooting on an aps c
then fell in love with shooting on a mft
now only shoot full frame sony cameras.
Since you can shoot anything, what is the payoff or benefit for some one like me who shoots landscapes and nature primarily with aps c? Other than fugi is such an awesome product, just in terms of form factor? brrr, are you warm now?
At the moment if I could have only one camera, I probably would go Sony a7R3. I have a number of cameras, though, and I'm strongly considering adding the X-T3 to my own kit.
Thank you for an excellent series of reviews on the XT3. I do have a question. Why is it a great disadvantage to not have IBIS?
Only really a disadvantage for Video and low shutter speed photos (which you would probably use a tripod for anyways)
Exactly...as I am only a stills photographer it is of no need to me. I wonder what the ratio of Vlogers to photo takers is?
IBIS works on all my lenses, including a number of manual focus lenses that I own (and it makes a big difference in the manual focus process, particularly when magnifying the image to visually focus). I would rather accept a stop less of stability on one given lens (assuming that lens-based OIS would be that much better, which I'm not sure it is), and get stabilization on all my lenses as a tradeoff.
I'm sorry, Daniel, but I completely disagree. There are all kinds of practical applications for IBIS in every day shooting, and it applies to all lenses.
I love the retro design, having grown up shooting fully manual cameras, that is, even before autofocus, the control by top plate dial in fact appeals.
Also, Fuji, unlike Sony, the camera comes with the choice of a wide array of high-quality native glass.
Also, I must be about the only person who does not have any real interest in IBIS/OSS etc. With the mega high ISO's all modern cameras are capable of, camera shake should not be a problem, except in situations when maybe you should be using a tripod.
Hmmm, if you've had it both ways, you definitely learn to appreciate IBIS for a lot of subtle reasons other than in low light conditions.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Some users and reviewers treat IBIS/OSS etc as though it is a deal-breaker in lens comparisons. Justin, in past times you have coped without it - I did, taking perhaps the best pictures using an OM2, purchased for AU$60 from a pawnshop, and using the mega fast Kodachrome slide film, ASA 64 - not 32,000.
Thank you for another great set of reviews. I had the XPro1 and XT1 camera bodies and loved them and the out of camera images but there was no good editing software at the time. Sold the bodies and kept the lenses in the hope Adobe or Capture1 would catch up. Adobe still sucks even though they will tell you differently. Capture1, 12 is fantastic. I borrowed an XH1 and used my lenses for two weeks at the flower festival and I am going to purchase new Fuji bodies as soon as the replacement for the XH1 arrives.
PS: APSC is the designation for the smaller Canon APS sensor with the 1.6x crop factor.
That's not actually correct, John. All crop sensor cameras are designed APS-C. From Fuji: 26.1MP APS-C X-Trans BSI CMOS 4 Sensor
Dustin Abbott Hey Dustin as usual you are completely correct APS-C stands for APS-classic. I don’t know why I thought the C meant Canon. Probably on a Nikon full frame forum ;-). Thanks again for your great reviews. Happy New Year.
great review as always man :) .would u choose the xt3 or the sony a7iii? i only shoot stills ,no video
That's seriously tough. They are both extremely competent cameras. I use need the extra dynamic range and shoot a lot at high ISOs, go a73. If you don't, and prefer your lenses to be smaller and lighter, go Fuji.
@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks Dustin :) .i think Sony might have more advantage when it comes to image quality.
Check out other reviews. They have image comparisons and a7iii is not as good
If all this tech is important to you then I would suggest you need to work on composition and story telling. The differences here discussed are so esoteric I often wonder what sort of images the techies are actually taking. I once went to a show in NYC where some famous photographer had a showing of images taken with a home-made pin hole camera. They were still great images that captured the viewer. I’m an old guy who learned film photography and love the fujis because of the aesthetics of the design and the film simulations.
I set a film sim as I would pick a specific film and go with it. While I don’t judge those who like to spend hours with an image on a computer, I prefer to capture as much as possible in-camera and that includes mood, color saturation, grain, composition, etc. In fact, all the post I do is some minor cropping. For me this makes photography more immediate and emphasizes that moment when the image is captured.
I’m also a musician who has done studio sessions. An engineer can bring drum beats back into the perfect quarter-note measure and bring a singer back to perfect pitch. As far as I’m concerned that’s bullshit art. But each to his/her/whatever own.
Photography has always been both tech and art.
If you can take great pictures with a pinhole, this is gonna do better.
Light room is just digital darkroom. Great photographers don't just pick a film, shoot, crop and calls it a great photo. They go as far as using specific paper and printer.
What the hell are you talking about? Hahhahhahahhaha
Excellent technical specification review .. I’m curious however Dustin, how do you “feel” when it’s in the hand and when operating the Fuji with it’s more tactile controls? I am Interested in the more intangible impression you have of it
I like all the physical controls, myself. I would say it is the most completely APS-C camera I've used.
Any idea what adapter to use on a Jupiter 9 with fujifilm?
Depends on the lens mount I think the Jupiter has 3, the m42, m39 and one other. I have a Jupiter 9 with a m39 to fuji adapter.
Frank is exactly right.
Thank you very much.
I've got a Jupiter 9 with M42 mount. I enjoy adapting M42 lenses to my Fujifilm cameras so much that I have multiple M42-FX adapters. Focus peaking on the X-T2 and X-T3 helps make focus precise even at wide open apertures.
Hi dustin, thanks for the review. Now that fuji x-t3 has same af-speed as x-t4 with fw 4.0 has this changed your opinion on the camera? I also wonder if the focus limiter is useful in real usage. I currently have the x-t2 and xf 35 f2 for family shooting. thinking of upgrading to x-t3 (which costs about 800 used from a individual) cant decide yet haha
The firmware updates have helped, though some focus features are still not at Canon or Sony levels. But I do think the X-T3 is very strong value at that price point.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Hi Dustin, thank you for your quick reply. I think canon and sony are hard to beat. Though I think Fuji is doing well for being such a small company. Value seems good indeed. I might pounce on one :) Ps: have you tried the 3d tracking mode on the x-t4 / x-t3? (c-af + wide tracking mode). I tried it in a store and seems quite sticky.
Well done. Great final review!
My pleasure.
Hi Dustin. Thanks for the information. I am pretty new to DSLR and mirrorless photography. I have been studying the basics such as manual mode, aperture, shutter speed and iso and bought some books. I have some money saved up to buy a nice camera and I have been studying both mirrorless and dslr. The two cameras I really like are the Fuji Xt3 for mirrorless and the Nikon D850 for DSLR. I know the Fuji is a lot cheaper, lighter and seems amazing. I was wondering your take on what you would decide for what reasons if you have time. Thanks so much.
Wow - that's not really a direct comparison. My best recommendation is that you look over the lenses you would like to have/use, and see which complete system (camera/lens/accessories) best suits your purpose. Both systems have great strengths.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks so much for responding. I will take some time and not rush it. I have been researching mirrorless vs. DSLR. I have a cheaper Nikon a bought a while back that is plenty good so I don't need to rush. I just love looking at this stuff and I got some money saved up that I am going to use for a new camera when I figure out what I want. I do like the Nikon D850 from what I have seen and also this Fuji xt-3. Thanks again.
Great explanation video thanks 👏🏻
You're welcome!
Excellent review Dustin, thank you. Visiting this in light of the pending XT-4 and it's specs... seems like Fuji watched this review as well. Curious if you have found some video coloring options (Eterna etc.) useful compared to Sony's? I'm probably still veering toward a used A7RIII then a used A7IV following. The EOS R5 would probably be my choice here soon but imagine that will come with a near $4k asking price. Outstanding job Brother, thanks again.
I do think the R5 will be pricey. I think your plan to go RIII then RIV is solid. I like the X-T3, but like the lens options on Sony better.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks for your thoughts Dustin... I sure wish it had a vari-tilt screen, it really is the one major drawback to the Sony's... and the lack of touchscreen functionality. I rented an A7III 6 months ago just to rule it out, lol, and found that I loved it, aside from the LCD Resolution which is why I would get the A7RIII primarily. Thanks again.
Please can you let me know how the files look compare canon 6d mark II at 3200 iso or 6400 what is your opinion? Great reviews as always.Thank you
They are cleaner, actually.
Dustin Abbott great to know I will rent this camera and test it.
Merry Christmas to you and family.
Full frame will always be cleaner. Bigger sensor always wins. It all depends on what you shoot. Canon full frame is great at high iso.
It more fun to shoot with than canon though.
Thank you for posting this! Really good video! I’m having a problem with both my X-T3 & X-H1 for monitoring audio. I have a SmallHD 5” external monitor that I really like but when I plug it in via HDMI, my audio stops monitoring from the camera, the recording still has audio, but I can’t hear anything. I guess the camera thinks I’m monitoring the audio through the HDMI output but it’s really annoying. Is there any trick we can do to avoid the camera to shut down the audio monitor jack while using a external monitor? Thank you!
That’s a pretty specific situation. You’re probably better off asking that question of Fuji
thank you, a great review !!!
My pleasure.
Having the xt2, and being very happy with it, should I be thinking of changing for the xt3?
I'm not familiar with the X-T2 (new to Fuji), but from what I understand the X-T3 was a big step forward in terms of autofocus and video performance.
Thanks for the great review! I’m thinking about buying the camera even though I already invested in the Sony. What compact all around lens would you recommend for this camera that is small, light, and very sharp? Thanks for your help. Johnny
I've used very few Fuji lenses so far, though I do really like the 35mm F2 (I'll be releasing coverage of it soon). I've heard good things about the kit lens, actually, though I haven't used it yet.
How do the colors compare to Canon and Sony?
Watch for my episode on the X-T30 next week. I deal with that a little bit.
Use a high quality gimbal and that will solve the lack of IBIS. IBIS is ok.....but a good gimbal is light years better.
That's true for video, Steve, but that's assuming that this is the major purpose of IBIS. I don't view it that way. It helps eliminate camera shake from portrait shots (at shutter speeds like 1/100th-1/200th, allows you flexibility for shooting shots with the shutter dragging a bit, and, perhaps most important to me, makes it much easier to fine tune focus manually because the magnified image in the viewfinder or LCD isn't jumping all over the place.
Another great video the XT3 is on my shoping list
It's a pretty sweet camera.
hello, you bought the XT3 how is it ??
Great review as usual Dustin. Just wanted to comment on your findings with the video autofocus as I own an XT3 and use it extensively for video. I've never found that the autofocus in video is "stepping" and actually have found it to be quite smooth actually, something similar to Sony's video autofocus system. Is the sample footage you provided in this review actual footage taken with your copy of the XT3? Or were you recording the screen using an external monitor? I've seen other reviewers have the same findings as you with video autofocus but it was apparent that they were just recording the screen and not actually recording footage, which is where I think this discrepancy occurs.
That was footage from the X-T3 (the one I was using) and the XF 35mm F2. I found a similar performance with the 200mm F2. The best performance in this area comes from Canon's DPAF.
Really like the xt3 but I don't feel the AF is as good as some say, I say this having done side by side tests with an a7riii & 85 1.4 and an xt3 & 56 1.2. I was outside the camera shop shooting pedestrians walking left to right in AF-C and the hit rate was 80% Sony and 30% Fuji. (Not sure if this could be addressed in a firmware update).
Aware that the focus speed of the lenses could be a factor here and I find it strange, (having seen many posts on this), that faster aperture and more expensive Fuji lenses tend to be slower focusing than the slower versions, I can't think of any of manufacture who's lense line-up is similar.
That doesn’t sound like my experience at all, though I haven’t used that lens. My hit rate was extremely high with the Fuji, though the same is true if the Sony with most lenses
Hey Dustin...would you prefer a XT3 wtih 18-55 or EOS RP with adapter and existing 16-35? Considering you mainly did travel photos and landscapes.
Probably the X-T3, actually.
The physical controls are the reason why I will buy it.
It does have excellent physical controls
i agree so much, Fuji and maybe pentax are the only one that actually worked the ass off to make good apsc lenses. good IQ, good build and elegant (except for pentax).
Nevertheless, i'm not a fan of the small grip and short battery life, bad wireless connectivity and the lack of fully articulated screen, so it is a no go for me but i should never say never ;)
There still isn't a perfect camera on the market, for sure, but the X-T3 is fairly complete.
Your shot is tilted to the left! Just teasing :) I really like your reviews. Find them detailed and not biased towards any manufacturer. Keep up the good work! And I'm really happy that you are reviewing other brands than Canon and Sony now. And about that camera - I like it a lot! The only thing that stops me from pulling the trigger on a Christmas gift for myself, is the price of the lenses. There are a lot of 3rd party lenses for bigger companies' cameras, which pulls the price down. Not Fuji, unfortunately.
Third party support is the definitely the missing component in the lens ecosystem. If Fuji moves more mainstream, however, I could see that changing.
Hi. Thank you Dustin. I have two questions I am looking at multiple brands review videos to answer. I like the T3 and T2 price entry points upgrading from my 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor bridge camera for wildlife and landscape. Can you use X-T2 or X-T3 tracking to lock on subjects while they are in motion and then have them tracked, for example capturing a flock of birds or one large bird (like a Heron) flying towards you and clicking multiple frames per second, or capturing them in video and maintaining focus while the flock or bird changes direction suddenly? Also, for video, will an OIS lens on a tripod in a ~20mph wind make up for the minor tripod vibration that drives me nuts (or should I admit at this point I need a gimbal)? Any help is a blessing. Thanks!
Hi - I would recommend that you look at my review of the 200mm F2 Fujinon lens to see what the X-T3 is capable of for tracking (it's impressive with good glass!). As for your second question - I haven't really tested that kind of situation. A gimbal to me is pretty much a must if you want seriously good footage, and they've gotten more reasonable.
Just a great review. IBIS isn't a huge priority for me, but I'm wondering about the size and weight of some of the larger, faster lenses. Do they overpower the body? Would it be better with a battery grip?
Take a look at the written review, as I also cover a really cheap accessory that makes a big difference with the grip. $40.
I'd really recommend the grip. It's really nice to have 3 batteries loaded up, and the camera feels pretty small in my bigger hands.
The only lens that I've seen that has a lot of weight is the 200 f2. Everything else is a lot smaller than Nikon / Canon glass
@@TheErikBallew I'm using my XT3 with a canon adapter with the sigma 18-35 (pretty heavy and big lens) and it would be hard to use without the grip (alternative options could be a smallrig cage which i want to buy too ;))
Hi Dustin a pleasure video like always. Im Planning the switch from 80D to this little beast. I have a Tamron 45 SP 1.8 do you think this combo works?
I have never tried adapting EF lenses onto Fuji.
Dustin Abbott When the time comes to do that crazy thing, I'll let you know how it works. Thanks for responding and for your professional videos.
Please review the Fujifilm X-Pro3 if possible, including its comparison with the Xt3.
My Fuji reviews are somewhat dependent on Fuji getting product to me.
I doubt they will ever add ibis to the xt line. They've stated they have to comprise to much with the size. That's why they developed the xh1 which is basicly a xt2 with ibis and slightly bigger body. I'm sure they will have an xh2 next year that will have ibis with all the new features of the xt3.
I think you're probably right, but moo is right, too: Sony manages to put IBIS and similar performance into the a6500, which is actually a bit smaller.
Interesting prediction.
I'm getting just as good and often BETTER results with the Fuji xt2 and their lower quality lenses than I do with a 3500K full frame with top of the line lenses, at least on the color and sensor side of things!! Less noise, excellent color that doesn't need to be adjusted to no end, and some kind of intangible quality, which I can not fully describe... a more delicate, ethereal vibe to the pictures that look less like digital files and more like Slides ...
Fuji does have good color science (particularly in the JPEGs).
Great and amazing explanation (new follower) Two thumbs up!
Welcome on board, Luigi
I’m a Fuji newbie with the XT3 ....shoot raw on to one card ..jpeg the other . Not impressed as others seem to be with noise , even as low , as 800 I S O and always have to deal with that on any raw I choose to keep .
What system are you coming from?
People wanting Full Frame have completely missed the point of this system. Fuji is actually interested in and capable of giving APS-C shooters incredible quality and performance in a smaller package, unlike Canon who uses lens gimmicks and marketing tactics to drive APS-C shooters to their Full Frame (read: more expensive) options.
I think that's a fair assessment.
Canon totally uses lens and marketing gimmicks, like with calling it EOS, as if that is something special, ha!
I am very interested in buying this camera buy also i am very interested in shooting the milky way.. Could someone talk about the performanceI of the x-t3 in shooting the galaxy? Perhaps @Dustin Abbott could you try it please and share your opinion? Thank you very much.
It works fine for shooting astro. The lens will have more to do with that than anything. The sensor is still fairly clean at ISO 3200 (and ISO 6400 with a bit more noise), so if you can shoot a lens that works well within those constraints, I think you will get great results.
Strange how Cartier-Bresson, Winogrand, Weston, Strand, Evans, Arbus, Salgado, etc, etc didn't need Ibis... alternatively use a thing called a tripod which photographers have been using for 150 years, or, more radically, try learning how to take a photo using both hands.
Let me offer a counter argument: If they could have had IBIS, do you think they would have disdained it? Making the argument that photographers did without is - to me - irrelevant. So have I most of my career as a photographer. But the fact of that matter is that now I don't, and rival camera makers do offer it, and it does make a difference.
Dustin, I suspect they would have little concern for trying to shoot at two seconds hand-held. Apart from anything else they were not afraid to have soft, often blurry images. They understood blurry images can lend a sense of movement and dynamisim to a typical street scene. In fact I would argue many of the greatest photographs ever taken are 'soft' by contemporary standards, with low dynamic range taken at medium apertures. The current obsession with super-sharp glass, razor-sharp bokeh and HDR is the product of commercial marketing, technology driven product reviews and far too many wedding photographers on RUclips who frankly are mainly concerned with dumb spec-sheets than understanding the poetry of an image.
It's just nice to have and offers some flexibility when a tripod isn't handy or is too cumbersome for the situation. As long as the lens has image stabilization, I'm fine with that.
I don't think that the importance of IBIS is trying to handhold two second exposures. I view the value more as eliminating motion blur from camera shake from a portrait at, say, 1/125th second.
@@stilllife-artandthephotogr3494 you do realise, you can do exactly that with IBIS? The idea is to have more options available.
Great review as always. The Spotmatic isn't a rangefinder either though....
I think you missed what I said - I said it is a classic SLR, not a rangefinder.
Can we edit Fuji’s raw photos in Lightroom? I heard there are some challenges to that.
I do it all the time.
Fuji probably has not given IBIS because it wants one to invest in its stabilized lenses. I was looking for a possible increment to A6500 but without IBIS no. Also I have too many manual lenses. And IBIS also makes it possible to do certain videos using very slow hand movements. These cannot be done without a tripod as one would never be able to minutely move it the way one moves ones hands. The same with photographic macro work. For those who say its not important as we did without it earlier, then just stop watching these videos as we did without internet earlier. I also do not care for the retro look. I worked too long on SLRs and now love the compact minimal body that one can customize. I think the difference between the different camera companies is in their systems. Fuji has created a kind of 'designer' style and specialization of the aps-c sensor size and with it specialty lenses. Thereby drawing the most out of the sensor size and therefore not needing a full frame.
Solid points. I’ve been surprised how many people have tried to take me to task over caring about IBIS. Silly, really.
They dont have many lenses that are well stabilized. Also, IBIS works to add more stabilization on top of stabilization coming from the lens, the lens or IBIS do not cancel one or the other out. Selling stabilized lenses is not the reason.
I bought one 4 days ago.
Enjoy!
Great review! While I doubt I will ever own this camera it does (or should) provide a ton of pressure on Sony, and especially Canon since this comes in about $800 less then their R. And while I cannot believe I am even considering it, I've been looking at the Fuji GFX 50R somewhat seriously. Now I'm not going to order it tonight, or probably any time next year (but then again, who knows. Life sometimes finds a way.) but would love to learn more about it. Ever consider talking to someone over there and see if you can get a loaner to try out for a few weeks? :)
Yeah, it's on my review list and I've already had the conversation with them about it. My next Fuji review is the 8-16mm F2.8.
What about the Samsung Nx-1 being 28mp?
That’s true, though the camera is no longer in production.
Great first minute ;)
Thank you!
Common... the same thing about IBIS. Regular shooter doesn't need IBIS at all. Use tripod for stills or gimbal for video!
Really? You think having a tripod with you at all times is the solution?
@@DustinAbbottTWIthe solution is to know how to take a photo, ibis is a lazy mind crutch
@@terjeaudio4308 Ummm, have you looked at my portfolio? www.flickr.com/photos/thousandwordimages/ | I'm not exactly a novice with a camera. Yes, I've taken a lot of great photos without IBIS, but it is far more than just a crutch for lazy photographers.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Dustin, no point explaining. For me, IBIS is a necessity for video work. the video capability is the differentiator for this camera and Fuji didn't include IBIS. for stills, the XT2 is still a great option for Fuji system. I have been with fuji from XE1 days. And then most of the older XF lens are not that great for AFC/Video AF. I have about 4 of them. So, in order to use the video, you'll have to invest on the current lens. Since Fuji was relatively new, shouldn't they developed their XF lens system to be video ready from day one?
Another issue with Fuji is their X camera value depreciates pretty fast. one of my criteria is resale value, especially with digital camera because the upgrade/replacement cycle is short due to tech obsolesce unlike film cameras. Fuji themselves de-values their camera by offering cashbacks/discounts. Just check the XH1, they started giving discounts and cashbacks a month after release. I see the same for XT3...
That's just not true, at all. All shooters should be using lower light situations, like at dusk and dawn, if they actually want to achieve truly beautiful imagery. Ah, you did say regular shooters, so yeah, they are regular.
Great. Product but it comes at a price for an apsc. The future will tell us if the lack of FF is a problem.
That's true, though this is hardly the most expensive APS-C camera on the market.
If you were to buy today, XT-3 or A7iii?
Probably A7III. I like the footage straight out of Sony's better for video work and also Fuji hasn't yet eliminated the 4GB limitation, which means that I don't reach for the X-T3 for video work even though it's a very capable camera. That might change if I had more lenses for the X-T3 too. At the moment I've got access to so much more Sony glass, so don't read too much into my personal feelings.
I have heard of editing issues with fuji raw files in lightroom. Is this the case with the xt3?
You'd have to be more specific about what those issues are. I've done all my post work in Lightroom, so obviously I haven't seen it.
@@DustinAbbottTWI There were reports about import issues, and images appearing softer compared to capture 1. But after seeing your iso comparison video, i dont think that its is an issue with the xt3
Is this the Sony A7/3 FF equivalent? very impressive APSC camera, I still shoot with the Xt1
The best way to see if this camera is for you is to rent it for a weekend. You will notice if the auto focus has improved enough for you for example, and so forth..
Very true!
Good advice.
Is it a A73 equivalent? Not at all, is it a good apsc? Yes.
You can't compare XT3 with cameras outside of its price range... How flexible is the RAW coming out of this camera? Does it worth to invest in it for professional photography?
Why can't I compare it with cameras out of its price range? I compared it to the a6500, for example, which is actually less expensive.
@moo Thanks for your answer :) I work with xt2 for the last 2 years and it is a very good all around camera for its price range especially. I hope we will see something better from canon before 2020, that worths investing in Canons mirrorless.
Do you use your xt3 more for video or stills?
I use it more for stills than video, as I mostly use Sony for my video work.
HA! i like how you said the SONY colors are better SOOC versus FUJI.
Did I say that?
Fuji xt3 or A7III for casual shooter who loves bokeh?
I would probably say a7III, as by nature many FF lenses have a more shallow DOF.
How did you scratch the front of the camera?
I can't take credit for that. The X-T3 (a loaner) arrived from Fuji looking like that.
:-)
@@DustinAbbottTWI
U don't need to apologize for that "slip-of-the-tongue" 'cos U reviewed many cameras and lenses that it's clear U know the matter U'r talking in Ur videos and besides it's obvious that it's not a rangefinder, just lookin' at the camera as anyone is able to do.
I mostly did that because I got lectured over that slip dozens of times.