This 340bhp TURBO'd GT86 is EPIC FUN!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 фев 2025

Комментарии • 65

  • @hampshirephoto
    @hampshirephoto  3 года назад +2

    Get Surfshark VPN at surfshark.deals/Hampshire - Enter promo code 'Hampshire' for 83% OFF and 4 extra months FREE!

  • @drive-r
    @drive-r 3 года назад +19

    Amazing video, thank you for featuring our GT86!

  • @shshh-fw9eh
    @shshh-fw9eh 2 года назад +9

    Seems really well sorted and sounds amazing. I really think an UEL exhaust and a turbo is a must for the 86/BRZ, not just because it lacks power but it adds emotion to it. Just listen to it when you go off the gas, it sounds so addictive. A great job that I feel like replicating in the near future. A specsheet of it would be so much appreciated.

    • @Prepelec
      @Prepelec Год назад +1

      i guess i have rare case of adiction for a supercharger whine

    • @shshh-fw9eh
      @shshh-fw9eh Год назад

      @@Prepelec Rare? May be, but count me in for supercharger whine too!

    • @Prepelec
      @Prepelec Год назад

      @@shshh-fw9eh now I have problem deciding, I have about 30k kilometres to do timing change I was planning to do k swap, but when I hear damn sc whine it makes me Wana buy short block and slap SC on it...

  • @jdmguy44
    @jdmguy44 3 года назад +8

    Looks and sounds amazing. Feel I want a GT86 in my life after watching this tbh.

  • @carsonschultz9071
    @carsonschultz9071 Год назад +2

    Glad i came across this video ben thinking of getting the car ,i think i will also add a victor racing active wing to improve performance , thanks for the video really enjoyed it

  • @Vicarivss
    @Vicarivss 3 года назад +2

    Never a disappointment, Luke. Keep it up. 👍

  • @LUKEASHLEYPEARSON
    @LUKEASHLEYPEARSON 4 месяца назад

    Quality build!
    I'd like one of these at 340 but after a completely sorted Whiteline 96 STI at 340 with AWD I just can't justify it :/ just like I can't an S2000. When I live somewhere drier I'll go S2000 with 500 Turbo stock block.

  • @Chivwari
    @Chivwari 3 года назад +9

    Definitely time to buy another one Luke! Love mine!

    • @jim8462
      @jim8462 3 года назад

      I drove a stock gt86 it was the most disappointing car Iv ever driven it Badly needed more power.

  • @mrporsche4236
    @mrporsche4236 Год назад +2

    Positive displacement supercharging these cars is by far the most fun. Turbocharging completely ruins it

    • @Booka3141
      @Booka3141 11 месяцев назад

      don't be daft

    • @0ri
      @0ri 9 месяцев назад

      @@Booka3141I agree with the comment. Supercharging keeps the essence of what they want with the car; instant power around corners and able to push the car to the limit daily. With a turbo it’s much harder to drive the car at its limit because you need to stay in higher rpms whereas superchargers give you that nice noise and linear power throughout the

    • @pak1ll3r
      @pak1ll3r 9 месяцев назад

      @@0ri LOL sure

  • @lemaga86
    @lemaga86 2 года назад +4

    Just one question. How ? How fa20 can handle 340bhp on stock internals ? Sounds really sick. I'm thinking to build engine to get 300whp and you get 340 on stock. Anyway great project at same time!

    • @drive-r
      @drive-r 2 года назад +3

      Hey! Running 340bhp on the FA20 is safe and ours has ran this for 8 years now. Its when you reach around 400bhp that the Rods can struggle. If you go above this then its advised to get forged rods. Drop us a follow on Instagram, would be great to follow your build!

    • @mresab1997
      @mresab1997 2 года назад +1

      @@drive-r hi! What about the transmission?
      Also, how often over the span of those 8 years were you on map 3 (340)?

    • @drive-r
      @drive-r 2 года назад +1

      @@mresab1997 Hi! Stock transmission is well up for the job! Map 4 is full boost, its spent plenty of time at full power. Handled 11 runs down santapod in one morning like a champ

    • @mresab1997
      @mresab1997 2 года назад +1

      @@drive-r awesome! Thank you for the reply. What was the “full boost” pressure you ranv

    • @drive-r
      @drive-r 2 года назад +1

      @@mresab1997 Believe full boost is running around 22-23 psi

  • @shepardman993
    @shepardman993 3 года назад +21

    Seriously why Toyota didn’t do this is beyond me

    • @smilepermile8165
      @smilepermile8165 3 года назад +22

      Because it would make the car more expensive and put people off with the idea of paying a lot with a 'Toyota badge'. Manufacturers want to have OEM levels of refinement and reliability so by adding a turbo, that requires a stronger transmission+clutch, beefier prop shaft, beefier drive shaft, more cooling and heavier piping so that it can do several laps at a track without heat soak issues. All this adds complexity and weight which is not what the 86 is about. The 86 is a car that teaches drivers about RWD car control within speed limits, its not meant for spec sheet enthusiasts who want to think that they're a good driver with a car thats fast on the straights.

    • @jdmguy44
      @jdmguy44 3 года назад +14

      Toyota deliberately kept the GT86 simple because they knew that a lot of them would be modified. The tuning scene for these in Japan and the US is huge. There's so much you can do to them.

    • @cerogravity8653
      @cerogravity8653 Год назад +3

      Because the Supra exists, why would they have a car with dam near equal weight and specs the fact is we will never get a factory turbocharged GR 86 from Toyota unless they do away with the Supra, also people miss the intended purpose of the 86 it’s supposed to be an affordable sports car key word is affordable if they add turbos they will have to change the whole drivetrain of the car and that will drive up cost just buy one and turbo it or supercharge it yourself.

    • @jonasbaine3538
      @jonasbaine3538 Год назад +1

      @@cerogravity8653 gr86 should have made a 3.0 flat 6 300hp evolution of the 2.0 200hp engine. A true Porsche cayman competitor like originally marketed in 2012.

    • @wyattspencer2281
      @wyattspencer2281 Год назад

      Dude the highest trim Supra only has like 320ish whp, why would they ruin sales of a car that’s alr not selling well by matching it with a car that’s only 2/3 the price?

  • @The_journeyy
    @The_journeyy 3 года назад +4

    This car sounds naughty 😳

  • @vroom6591
    @vroom6591 3 года назад +4

    Cool I'm only five minutes away from Stourbridge

  • @Manuqtix.Manuqtix
    @Manuqtix.Manuqtix Год назад

    Can you make a fast brz without any boost??

    • @Icemann336
      @Icemann336 8 месяцев назад

      With great difficulty and a lot of money, theres not many that recorded to go past 230hp NA, unless you mean around corners in which case, these are already really agile

    • @Manuqtix.Manuqtix
      @Manuqtix.Manuqtix 8 месяцев назад

      @@Icemann336
      after all turbo’s are for those who can’t build engines

  • @Gorilla_Jones
    @Gorilla_Jones Год назад +1

    Supercharging is the way to go for sure.

  • @ghostpsgaming5871
    @ghostpsgaming5871 4 месяца назад

    I want to buy this car but I’m just scared of getting a high mileage car and inheriting all sorts of problems

  • @lastnamefirstname520
    @lastnamefirstname520 3 года назад +2

    See man, this is what I was sayin, turbo it!

  • @FastDriver318
    @FastDriver318 3 года назад

    Stock M140i or this (purely on the drive)?

    • @paradox4431
      @paradox4431 3 года назад +2

      stock m140

    • @jim8462
      @jim8462 3 года назад

      M140i or this are you mad

  • @aaronwilkinson1901
    @aaronwilkinson1901 3 года назад +2

    Absolute geek bro 🤣

  • @nico3727
    @nico3727 2 года назад +2

    As if the boxer isn't unreliable enough

    • @nico3727
      @nico3727 2 года назад

      Wow it's lasted longer than I thought

    • @drive-r
      @drive-r 2 года назад +3

      @@nico3727 Still going strong

    • @user-sk4wf3ve6z
      @user-sk4wf3ve6z 2 года назад +2

      Only the 2012/13 were unreliable,iv done 160k miles in my 2014 and never had any problems

    • @romeocano1919
      @romeocano1919 Год назад

      187k miles on stock regularly maintained 2013 frs

  • @Rob6MSTV
    @Rob6MSTV 3 года назад +1

    You'd struggle to make that any uglier 😅

    • @ee1yd
      @ee1yd 2 года назад +9

      all a matter of opinion mate

    • @romeocano1919
      @romeocano1919 Год назад

      oh you havent seen half of these then

  • @mattnicholls1992
    @mattnicholls1992 Год назад

    Slow

    • @devilsoffspring5519
      @devilsoffspring5519 Год назад

      It'll probably go ~170+ MPH? You think it's slow? It's a light car with plenty of power. Probably traction limited in the first 2 gears if not 3.

  • @JoshXCVIII
    @JoshXCVIII 3 года назад +1

    In all those years why would you not sort out that ugly interior, sick card none the less

  • @DaleSteel
    @DaleSteel 3 года назад +3

    Wow imagine spending all that money on that lol

    • @KXP70
      @KXP70 3 года назад +18

      Imagine being a car snob 🤡

    • @jorgnyoa3561
      @jorgnyoa3561 2 года назад +3

      much rather have a good looking car whit the one problem it has (power) solved.

  • @JR19k
    @JR19k 2 года назад +2

    They're not as fast as they look you mean