Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Am I Really A Visual Learner?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 окт 2016
- You might consider yourself a visual learner, but is there really a way to categorize different types of students?
Hosted by: Hank Green
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: / scishow
----------
Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters -- we couldn't make SciShow without them! Shout out to Bryce Daifuku, Kevin Bealer, Justin Lentz, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Patrick Merrithew, Accalia Elementia, Fatima Iqbal, Benny, Kyle Anderson, Mike Frayn, Tim Curwick, Will and Sonja Marple, Philippe von Bergen, Chris Peters, Kathy Philip, Patrick D. Ashmore, Thomas J., Charles George, Bader AlGhamdi.
----------
Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: dftba.com/scishow
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: / scishow
Twitter: / scishow
Tumblr: / scishow
Instagram: / thescishow
----------
Sources:
www.psychologic...
psycnet.apa.org...
www.researchga...
www.sciencedire...
www2.ed.gov/rs...
For some reason when I close my eyes, I can't see..
ThePlainKiller dude that's weird. Have you been to a doctor yet?
ThePlainKiller Alice can help you out
ThePlainKiller that's weird, I see black
"And knowing is half the battle ..."
Kat465k fun fact: but when you're blinking, you actually see nothing (you don't see black), because the vision is basically disabled during the blink
I feel like visual learning is less boring, which makes me able to concentrate on it more and thus learn faster
He-Man And can be use as entertainment
You're screwed if you are watching this video but are bad at verbal learning.
I don't understand??
turn on the subs
It's a joke.
Is this a joke?? It makes NO SENSE.
I read lips to hear. Does that count?
Congratulations on becoming a father Hank!
random850 how did u know tho?
MrVibriocholerae It's on the vlogbrothers channel
!!!
it was on here too, a lot of the Vida with him in it are pre recorded after this date
This might be some of that "pre-recorded" stuff he was talking about. Maybe he's still out.
Who are these glorious teachers actually caring about how I learn best?
I mean it’s pretty irrelevant on how you learn though
I find Visual to be easier b/c when someone gives me directions or i read directions i tend to forget steps... But when im shown all the steps it's almost like having land markers in the sense that i can remember what it's supposed to look like for the next step... not sure if that makes sense... The short of it is i forget what i read and people say to damn easily
Exactly! Same here!
I almost failed pre calculus my first year, then I switched teachers, and he showed us how to think about the problems with diagrams and blocks, and I was able to grasp the idea and I ended up with honors three years in a row and didn't even have to study for most of my exams. learning by reading is a whole other story..
That "study" he mentioned around 1:30 isn't only *bad* science, it's *no* science.
When words or stories get told to me, i usually stare into nothingness and space out because i imagine things while i listen. It's easier to comprehend for me that way
I think it's because our minds associate certain words or notions a lot better with pictures rather than with bland audio.
I mean imagine trying to learn a language without ever seeing its letters. Damn near impossible.
26% of the worlds population is currently illiterate, and for most of human history the majority of the population was illiterate, and before that writing didn't exist. So it's actually the norm to learn languages without ever seeing the written version.
Troy Adams Good point, but what I meant by learning a language was the words themselves.
That's why for the most of human history there also existed specific known as "literate" writers for queens and kings through the ages. Because they did NOT know the letters, they in turn did NOT know the words. At most they would only know how to speak a language without a very wide vocabulary. They simply never used visual learning to actually learn the letters and write things themselves. They only heard the words and therefore could only speak it.
I feel like the ability to learn better from visual stuff goes back to more primitive times when verbal communication was less of a thing. I'm talking like, before language, or around the time of proto-language, when literally all we could do was show or watch how to do things. The ones that were able to learn well this way were the ones that survived.
You know why I'm on RUclips? Yep, visual learner.
Technically, videos engage *all* types of learning, which is why they work so well.
I'm so glad this channel is here. So i dont have to explain things to people instead Hank can do it.
:)
I used to think I was a visual-based learner, by now I know I'm a Hank-based learner.
My hypothesis is that learning styles are actually dependent on the topic rather than the student. Some topics are better taught visually than textually, and others are taught better vice-versa.
Yeah ,exactly it depends on the thing you learn
How I learn best depends on the type of material I'm learning. If I'm learning something completely new, for which I have no context, I need all the help I can get to understand the concept. If I'm learning something new about a topic with which I have a great deal of familiarity, I can build the visuals I need in my head, based on the existing context. For example, I'm terrible with auditory instructions, if I need directions to a place where I have never been. The third instruction to turn left or right, and I'm lost, I can't remember what was said, I need a map, but if the new place is in a neighborhood I'm familiar with, I can drive there in my head as the person tells me where I'll need to turn. If what I am learning is a task that requires me to physically do something, then I have to physically do it to learn it, even if I think I understand what to do by watching someone else. Listening to a lecture, it helps me to physically write what I hear, so that I can see the words, and then retain the information.
According to one of my old teachers, I'm part visual and part kinesthetic. And I do learn better with these styles, so that was a pretty helpful thing to learn. Hoo-Rah
I don't really consider memorizing to be learning. Or at most, it's a lower type of learning, and not the most important type of learning. A lot of these "learning" studies are just testing memorization, so I think they're not really that useful.
+
DrZaius Agreed. If a person can't recall something a year or two later, they didn't "learn" anything.
DrZaius I agree completely. memorising is not learning because it is forced and not understood properly by the brain. I always forget anything memorised 2 weeks after an exam for example. now I aim to learn and understand it which sits perfectly I'm my head
School is based on memorizing in my opinion we don't really learn
@@yasminwilliams2837 oh , are you an A student ?
Would you guys do a video on un-diagnosed adult Autism Spectrum Disorder?
I'm 33 and going to my doctor next week because I'm concerned that I'm on the low end of the spectrum; maybe a high-functioning autistic. I feel that I've had way too many of the symptoms over my life for it to be coincidence or a combination of other issues.
That's actually really interesting! Keep me posted on what the doctor thinks :) What symptoms do you show? I have an old friend who's high functioning autistic, really cool dude but some things tick him off, and my grandmother actually works at a school centered around helping lower functioning individuals with autism lead the life they want to.
If SciShow did a video on this, it would be awesome!!!
Thanks for the response, DIY.
My symptoms are pretty excessive: difficulty relating to others (a feeling of being 'outside' looking 'in'), lack of strong interpersonal relationships (no real friends, been single my entire life), isolation (lives alone), difficulty in telling if someone is joking, difficulty with "small-talk", I tend to give the impression that I'm arrogant (which I don't believe I am), extremely observant, bothered by sounds that others aren't bothered by, strict routines (which I hate to break), social anxiety (and avoidance of social situations), depression, overly polite, pedantic, and quick speech, extremely candid and honest (to a fault, I think) with people I'm comfortable around, difficulty with eye contact... the list goes on and on.
What's interesting is that my field of study in college was Psychology, but it never clicked that HFA was something that I may have. Also, I'm old enough that I was a kid before they began screening for autism. So I suppose it's a possibility that it's just gone somewhat under the radar.
madattaktube I can relate. In my college days my social anxiety was so bad I sometimes look back and wonder how I even got my degree. You should talk to someone about it, a school counselor, perhaps.
Oh wow, sounds like a lot!! You do make a very good point, they wouldn't be screening for it at the time you were a kid. That's interesting how during your time as a psych major HFA didn't come up as a possibility.
I hope your doctors appointment goes well! I can't relate, but if there are things you have difficulty with that you want to be changed, I hope your doctor is able to help!
Good luck :-)
Thanks for the kind words!
I'm in the Navy and working on my Master Training Specialist qualification, and identifying that there visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners is a key part of that. And am curious why kinesthetic learners weren't included? Learning by doing and touching is a huge way to acquire skills and knowledge.
I learn the best when I try to explain a concept to someone else. It does at least feel like i know it much better afterwards
Wow. That study is bad, and the researchers should feel bad.
I found the video interesting, but from personal experience I can see how there are different learning styles.
I'm in high school and was tested on a wide range of things for an IEP and the results were that I had a disconnect for my visuals, but I was especially strong with my audio. I know that I am an audial learner; I pick up way more info from people talking about things and classroom discussion, rather than the basic "Read chapter X and answer these questions".
In terms of actual data, you can see it on my transcripts. Last year I had 2 As, 2 Bs, and 2 Cs, but after switching to a school with classrooms geared towards how I learn, I have straight As.
I learn best by watching. Someone demonstrates, I copy/repeat what they did and BAM, learning.
Personally I find the mix of different styles the best, but as I have a kind of synesthesia that makes me see concepts as places in 3D space (seeing time as a sort of a line, while cyclic events like days of the week or months as an elypse), drawing visual maps and assigning things I learn places in relation to each other seems to work pretty well. For my last exam I written keywords on sticky pieces of paper and started putting them on my rooms walls, then I would put other keyword or concept close to the ones it was related to. I covered half of my room in these and I remembered most of the facts. I only did shitty in historical dates, because numbers just don't stick to my mind like ever.
Watched a 1 min ad and didn't skip becuz I support SciShow.
My way is amazing. I don't get anything at the time I'm learning it, but I somehow know everything on the day after that.
Thanks God Hank's back.
I have ADHD and I suck at learning auditorially, cause I'm in a permanent state of slightly zoning out and back in again. If you zone out when someone is talking to you, or even just as you are trying to commit something to long term memory from working memory, it's gone forever. I couldn't count the number of times someone has told me a date or time or some small thing to remember, I say "yep" and then two seconds later it is lost to the void.
I learn through EXPERIENCE and by that I mean reading or seeing it first, I get the idea, but I learn it only WHEN I ACTUALLY DO IT.
That is the secondary phase of learning.
We're talking about the first, prior to your build-up of experiences. Learning is just a by-product of your experiences.
i.e. If someone asked you to cut their hair, would you want to listen to a barber cut another person's hair, have them explain it to you, or have them show it to you?
There was also a study on what changes an uninformed/misinformed persons mind. They found that a graph was more likely to change someone's mind than text explaining the same information.
There should be a study on how learning from videos may be a better tool for kids now a days. I'd love to see some numbers to prove/disprove that hypothesis
Congrratulations on the baby Hank!
The reason for this is pretty simple, really. The greater number and variety of connections you can make from existing information to a new piece of information, the easier it is for your brain to "find" it again, and the more likely it is to stick.
Did any of the studies have students with learning disabilities?
I myself have an auditory learning disability (APD) and the only way I can learn effectively is visually.
Also, thankyouthankyouthankkkkyou for making the text emphasized with color instead of alternating the font size, making me motion sick by feeling like I'm going up and down trying to get the whole sentence in.
I dont think im good at learning
but you know what im good at? sleeping,I'm so good at it that I can do it with my eyes closed ;3
i'm giving you props for that one
congratulations on the birth of your son, welcome to the world of dads. Hope mother and baby are doing fine.
This makes pretty obvious sense. Most, if not all people cannot easily identify the importance of an abstract concept without first drawing a connection between a certain material and the real world. This is what gives the information meaning and more importantly, a purpose for your brain to keep the newly learned information ingrained in your memory.
As an asperger I have to say that if i have to learn something it have to be visual otherwise i won't learn it no matter how hard i try
the only exeption is when it is something i'm really interested to, in this case I can learn it now matter how but otherwise it is only via visual ^^
Alkéryn I'm the same, I completely agree. If it's not visual it will go through one ear and out the other
That's interesting. I have Asperger's, and I'm usually the opposite.
Ernst-Jan Bruggink What do you mean by that ?
+Ernst-Jan Bruggink People with Asperger's and autism in general often express the characteristics that make them defined like this in very different ways.
Alkéryn only today i started using subtitles now i understand stuff more but im a good reader and im not deaf
Best way to learn is definitely to teach. Like when an exam is coming up, just jump to the library and read up on your exam question and then try and explain it as simply as you can so someone else.
It sounds to me like auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learning just have to do with how closely the learner interacts with the subject.
Auditory learning is 3rd person. You just hear/read about how it's done.
Visual learning is 2nd person. You see it being done.
Kinesthetic learning is 1st person. You do it yourself.
It seems obvious to me that kinesthetic learning should be the easiest kind of learning, because it requires the least amount of imagination. Likewise, auditory learning is the hardest for the opposite reason.
This helps demonstrate the importance of imagination for learning. The better a student's imagination, the easier it is for them to visualize a problem and find its solution without a first or second hand example.
It's the repetition when it's a combined visual and verbal that really helps.
Can you do one on cerebral aneurysms? I had one rupture at 19 and would love to learn more!
Look at the word.
Say the word.
Cover the word.
Spell the word.
That is how I practiced my spelling words when I was young.
spaghetti.
Mom's?
but on the surface he looks calm and ready, to drop bombs
I hope she made lots of it
where?
You are now reading this in black and white.
Damn you
No I am not.
what
Incorrect I am currently reading this in white and black (RUclips custom theme)
what about physical learning I find it easier if I do stuff myself and learn a lot faster
It's called Kinesthetic Learning.
stefan brown tbh, all 'learning styles' are kind of the same, it is easier to learn a practical skill by actually performing the skill but 'kinesthetic learning' isn't effective for other types of skills (comprehension, learning new mathematical skills etc). The fact of the matter is, for the most part (barring any developmental abnormality) we all have the same brain and the same learning techniques work for all of us. This 'learning style' theory was pulled from thin air and has no real academic support and is often used as a justification by poor readers to excuse themselves from building their literacy skills. So, yes, you are a kinesthetic learner, sometimes.
Mark G - THANKS! Never knew it had a name, but that's exactly how I learn to do new things
yay!~ finally our favorite host
Well, get used to the others, because Hank just had a baby.
woodfur00 I did after I unpateroned
I learn best when there is a strong distraction factor, such as loud music, nice women to talk to and literally everything else but the stuff I should work with. At a certain point, these distractions become a sort of insulator between the world and my studies and the final outcome is almost always excellent. Other learning schemes do not work at all and I forget everything instantly.
"Tell me and I forget, teach me and I may remember, involve me and I learn."
I think is more important to ask how someone understands something.
I propose a different test: learning a complex musical sequence just by hearing, against learning it with the help of the music sheet.
I sang in choirs. Many of the other singers could learn the intricate notes of Bach or Mozart's music by hearing them, using the score just as a guide. Me and others needed the score to *understand* the sounds we were hearing before learning them.
A combination of audio and visual works for me.
This visual, auditory, tactile, whatever, style seems more a matter of the content being taught rather than the student learning it .
As couple peaple mentioned the best way to learn is to repeat. No matter is it words, actions or other stuff
My son and myself both have psychological testing that shows superior iq scores on visual perceprual tests and lower scores on auditory processing tests. My son’s auditory performance was 40 points lower than his visual performance (central auditory processing disorder) while mine were just 21 or 22 points lower. For some of us, there is a clear disability with auditory processing. If people like us, rather than just self identified visual learners are tested, I cannot see how there wouldn’t be significant validity to visual specific learning strategies.
I like how he spelled the phenomenon out ,because I was about to admire that I am a visual learner since, most times in school I want to see the word to know better .But here in the vedeo I realized that if you learn something in several ways ,especially visual and auditory learning with each other will make you learn fast . And the picture it is the best idea actually to learn something and remember it then.
Congratulations for the baby Hank! :)
May not be a visual learner - but you can have great visual memory/ three dimensional memory.
Try imagining your home - scale, size, textures colors, doors, furniture, any cracks or damage, how it looks in the dark or when lights are on, inside or outside and even places you don't often look at. Can you clearly "see" it or even recall sounds?
a picture paints a thousand words
I'm an olfactive learner.
This joke stinks.
Kamelito Toe
You don't?
L Galicki armpits
I tutor handwriting (and sometimes other things), and … well … things got “interesting” on the day that a new student asked (actually, ORDERED) that I must never have her look at anything, trace anything, or copy anything because (she said) she was an auditory learner instead, so (she declared’) I “needed” to teach her entirely by talking! Unsurprisingly, she did not book a second lesson (you can imagine how the first lesson went, or, rather, didn’t go). However, since that day, I have had a lot of fun talking about this incident with believers in “learning styles,” and asking what they would suggest for the next auditory learner who calls and asks me for handwriting lessons.
this is discrimination against kinesthetic learners. we deserve representation too
2:01 You guys are crediting the CK-12 foundation for the image, but I'm pretty sure those flashcards are originally from the Time Life Science Library book: Matter.
Just to nitpick.
When citing sources, you cite where _you_ got it from, not where it might have originated. That way, if the source has been altered in any way, the responsibility falls on your source. If you cite that you got it from the original place, but then someone finds its been altered in some way, you're the one who gets into trouble for it.
This is a more common problem when people misquote versus using pictures, but same principle applies. Always cite where _you_ found it, not where it originated from.
Twosocks42
Oh yeah? [Citation Needed].
(runs, fast as possible)
Great presentation. Here's a funny story. My girlfriend asked me once, "Tell me what you see when I tell you this word." She told me the word "car" then asked, "What do you see?" I told her I saw a car. Instantly she said, "You're 'concrete."" I was confused. I was thinking that she just dissed me. She then went on to explain that there are two types of thinking: Subjective and Concrete. Subjective being for people who would see the word "car" and those who actually see a car. She checked by asking me what the car looked like and I described it to her.
I had this to say my sweet, loving, and most of all, intelligent girlfriend-- the one who taught me that it's not what you say but how you say it: "Yeah? Is that why I keep having to tell you what to write about?"
It seemed that maybe she had something there: I saw pictures. She saw words, and was also a straight A student at a private university who never could figure out any good stories to write for her classes. I was always a B-C student but always had a story to tell, and she even got some published.
Does that ring a bell with your statistics---> imagination? I mean, some of the most brilliant friends that I've had couldn't tie their own ties if the grants depended on it.
I'm a process thinker. I learn much easier if what I'm learning has processes to it. Facts I'm ok with, but tell me a process, and its in my head for good.
I would say, out of 100%, 70% would be visual for me, 15% verbal, and 15% reading
oh my god thank you! i always hated the mandatory tests for learning styles and got into a lot of arguments about their validity...
In high school I took a survey, at the very top was kinestic learning (to learn by doing), with visual as a close second, then auditory waaaaaay at the bottom. So what I'm a bit curious about his how much note taking or other kinestic style learning techniques, such as repeating everything you hear to yourself, would factor in. Some of those are just things you can't test.
Greetings, Hank from the past!
I'm a pretty strict textile learner: I can't learn jack sh*t unless I can do the work, myself. But on the plus side, I learn it pretty damn quick when I do
I thought it was common knowledge that the best way is to include ALL of your senses in learning.
I am learning a new language as an adult and things we're doing in school include to go out and touch the things that we're supposed to learn. Go to a market, learn some of the culture and bring back a photograph to do an assignment with. Sing and walk around while talking and so on. Well, we didn't have any smell- or kissing-assignments, but that's okay. ;-)
I need that hands on style, because the visual and auditory learning isn't "enough" for me. Maybe I'm just slow, who knows.
Congrats Hank!!
When you want to learn something about people, like how we best learn things for example, it may be a good idea to consider our prehistoric background. How did we do it for hundreds of thousands of years? In the case of learning we probably used all of our senses repeatedly to recognize patterns and likely followed the examples of those closest to us.
No matter how we learn something, in the end we visualise it in our minds. People who prefer verbally learning just happen to be good at intaking more information (probably due to knowing more vocabularies) and visualising that information.
yeah , I really like your explanation.
especially we visualise it in our minds.
i leanr by neither I learn by using my hands
You should hook up with my neighbor, he learns by using his face.
***** kinesthetic - tactile learning is a learning style in which learning takes place by the students carrying out physical activities, rather than listening to a lecture or watching demonstrations.
that's what I meant ya fuck nut.
David Remus
I ask someone to cut them off.
You literally can't learn anything by using your hands... Unless it's through tactile signing
Then how did I get my college diploma and become a certified welder? I didn't learn from books or by being told what to do I just learnt by doing.
and I never really learnt anything in school I always had teachers and girlfriends do all my work for me cause I don't learn things any other way than using my hands thus why I passed all of high school with a %51 average grades 9-10-11-12
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ORIN!!!
maybe learning styles aren't inherit but I would say there's got to be some relationship between preference and person
I think history class would have been much less miserable if ANY of my teachers used a visual timeline and talked about events in the context of that visual aid. I have seen Sunday Schools also use visual timelines to make Bible history exceedingly easier to learn.
I have ALWAYS done better with visualizations of abstract information. I have learned over the years to naturally turn any new spoken information into a mental slideshow, and business meetings become much easier to follow. I also tend to draw rudimentary pictures of ideas, like a flowchart or spider graph, while discussing non-physical topics with people. (Also love using my hands to give concepts a physical space to exist in while explaining things to people.)
I also love love love analogies. Like, to the annoyance, I'm sure, of the people around me. Everything ridiculous or out of place or frustrating to me I will try to come up with some simile to describe it as accurately as possible... I do this most of the time while driving alone.
"Thinking in Pictures" by Temple Grandin gives an interesting twist on this subject.
For me, it really depends on the material. Want me to grasp a mathematical concept? Let me practice. Want me to remember some random fact about Themistocles? Give me a good lecture and a couple good pictures. Want me to learn the grammar for some foreign language? Give me a good textbook(preferably with bland charts reminiscent of an excel sheet), and let me take notes.
More videos about the science of learning please. Or the science of teaching (if that's any different)
I am a hands on learner (kinetic learning?). I learn by doing, even if it"s copying text verbatim. If I write it down, I remember it 10x's better than saying it or seeing it. Unfortunately, I tuned noises out pretty easily, so hearing to learn something is the worst way for me to retain information. I actually learned to read mostly from watching subtitled Japanese anime when I was younger (and comic books). Going on a tangent, anyhoo, thanks for another great video! I'm sure this is a sneak peek into SciShow Psych ;)
I can memorize a few hundered pages thick book by reading it once, I remeber what clothes and styles my elementary schoolmates wore 17 years ago by seeing it inside my head like picture, I can project any moving parts or human anatomy,or machine in 3D in my head to test how it works ,but for love of god I cant remember what did somebody TELL me yesterday, even if its juicy gossip or important scientific information, name,date, to do list or whatever. I cant memorize the song unless I associate visual image with it, I can play piano quite well first from sheets then from memory, never other way around, even simple child songs... Sooo I would say that inherent learning styles exist :D because I really tried, it would make my life much easier, but its impossible for me.
and here i am wondering what i had for dinner last night :( i have super poor memory
Essa educativa aí já tá em outro nível hein kkkkk
I was actally diagnosed with a visual learner something i forgot I learned today from my parents
I definitely agree with the combination of listening and seeing to learn. I also learn from examples, which I guess is related to pictures.
What about someone that can see a martial arts move once and can tell you how it works and different ways to use it. He also seems to use these moves faster then most people.
then hank, it seems you're in the right place, doing the right thing. kudos, good sir.
I am most certainly a visual learner. I did pretty in school given everything was book based....well except a few classes like lab, chem, art etc. But once I started working as a mechanic I never had to pick up a book and could basically build a truck from scrap parts 6 months later. That is also why I use YT to learn new skills now rather than a wikihow or something.
what it might actually mean is that youre a bad auditory learner... but left with a picture to learn at youre own pace you eventually get it
for concepts-------- visual/ animations
for facts ---------- written
well yeah.
but the best if it's like a movie. or RUclips video.
I learn best in a class. zoning out. doodling and listening.
sometimes with pictures. but definitely not reading.
if I had to choose. definitely audio. unless it's something you NEED a picture to be able to understand it. like a diagram or just things like. this object is this.
but I'm one of those people with no literal imagination. so "audio" are ALL my thoughts.
can you hear voices, or music in your head
I could swear scishow did an episode on that. ...not being able to visualize or create images in your mind.
joshuah.
yeah same. even tho it usually aren't words I don't understand that make me zone out.
it's when I'm not interested at all. and it's boring.
ourpeanutgallery
how do you think I know that it's actually a thing and imagining is literal
***** I'm actually exactly the same. I'm technically gifted and I guess annoyingly so to my friends, idk whatever, but I'm a paaaaainfully slow reader. ..which surprises them completely. I constantly have to re-read and zone out l and everyone else always finishes wayyy ahead of me (plus, I DO actually want to fully understand what I'm reading before just moving on, so just skimming like others do, I can't do it.)
I do have ADHD, so my zoning out with bad writing, but hyperfocusing to the point of completely shutting out the rest of the world with something love - could be just because of that. But I'm with you. Perhaps you could even consider is ADHD is even a possibility for you if it's more than an annoyance. :)
I work at a architechtual company in which i draw and model buildings. And with new things i get explained more and more new stuff. When somebody explains something to me for about 15+ seconds, i get completely spaced out. It almost feels like i'm staring at the paper, listening to words but all those words lost all meaning. :P
So i learn by doing the best.
if only teachers understood this sighs
But I really, really, reaaally can't imagine something visually. when i told to close my eyes and imagine something, even something that i usually see, like my house, all i see is just an abstract concept, mostly colored dark red because my eyelid. I never blown away by reading novels because all i see is just words. But the strangest part is, i been a successful artist my whole life. i paint, photograph, even directing movies with no problem.
I think this is hog wash. Just tell the little tikes to shutup, sit down, and turn to page 48 in the text book.
jmsether * page 394
jmsether * page 394 section b part 3 question 9 iii
Ropsana Khanom He was referencing Harry Potter bud.
0:03 Yes, Hank. YOU!!!
I consider myself a verbal learner, but that's probably because the vast majority of my classes revolve around discussing a subject. I'm sure if I was learning a strict discipline, I'd do better with pictures.