War Thunder - HOW will the SOVIET TECH TREE (Air) look like in the FUTURE? FLANKERS? Su-24's? Su-57?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 дек 2024

Комментарии • 415

  • @Peter-ox7wh
    @Peter-ox7wh Год назад +143

    Su-27 and so on are huge aircraft, would be interesting to see how they compared to the others.

    • @bigmemer4398
      @bigmemer4398 Год назад +6

      We already have f-14 which is big

    • @thesupreme8062
      @thesupreme8062 Год назад +21

      @@bigmemer4398 the is su 27 massive

    • @eze3922
      @eze3922 Год назад +2

      @@thesupreme8062 f14 is bigger

    • @thesupreme8062
      @thesupreme8062 Год назад +5

      @@eze3922 its slightly bigger but its faster and a twin seat, and the comparison is bad, the su 33 is bigger than an f14 and its also carrier capable

    • @JSON689
      @JSON689 Год назад +1

      I doubt there will be Mig25. That thing cant really turn and I dont think there will be hypersonic missles so it will be basically useless

  • @mab2187
    @mab2187 Год назад +328

    Don't forget the Su-37 and 47, they might have been only tech demonstrators but they would've used the latest and greatest weapons during their times. R60M, 73s, 77, 27ET/ERs etc etc bombs, AGMs, and they were mounted with 30mm cannons. I'd like to see them and use them, they are my loves!

    • @raygunreagan2274
      @raygunreagan2274 Год назад +12

      Go play ace combat 7 then they’re in that game the su47 and su37 shouldn’t be added even the yak141 shouldn’t have been added

    • @mab2187
      @mab2187 Год назад +50

      @@raygunreagan2274 been there done that, now I want in them in War Thunder and chances are very high they will come in due time. People will pay its a fact. And the game is now finished with pure historical BS. Its now gonna need to start bringing more proto, and half built and blue print vehicles. Besides that is the inevitable.

    • @thiagorocha5133
      @thiagorocha5133 Год назад +32

      @@raygunreagan2274 Warthunder is that kind of game that only generates hype with the addition of new stuff every update. At some point Gaijin will be forced to add those proto/tech demonstrators aircraft, like the mirage 4000, f16xl, 15 stol/mtd, su37, su47, yf23 and others

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 Год назад +18

      One sad thing about SU-47 is that it may end up being an CRAFTING EVENT vehicle

    • @thiagorocha5133
      @thiagorocha5133 Год назад +6

      @@kajmak64bit76 Yeah, same for the yf23 if it comes to the game and other prototypes or tec demonstrators (su37 terminator, f16xl, and others). Anyway, i think those iconic aircrafts deserve to be added

  • @atomicvortex6071
    @atomicvortex6071 Год назад +44

    damn the grind is gonna be crazy even if only half of these planes come out

    • @braedynhoward3644
      @braedynhoward3644 Год назад +4

      For sure... but hopefully the economy changes will soften the blow a bit XD

    • @Korixon.
      @Korixon. Год назад +2

      I think there should be a part 2 of a tech tree. For example tier 9 would be locked until the rest of the tech tree is done, then to make the grind easier, some of the first rank 9 would be a lot cheaper in rp, comparable to rank 5 or maybe 6. Or they could just make the rp go barely go up and a huge jump in rp multiplier

  • @molashen771
    @molashen771 Год назад +7

    I'm surprised that the mig 25 hadn't been added yet, it's so iconic.
    Gaijin pls I need my mach 3 steel shitbrick of a plane in my life

    • @US.NVG.
      @US.NVG. 3 месяца назад

      lmfaoo

  • @simon_figas1699
    @simon_figas1699 Год назад +26

    Just missing the Su-47 as an event vehicle on rank 7

  • @Marxist1917
    @Marxist1917 Год назад +9

    Su-30 and Su-27 forever in my heart😊

  • @McMissile3612
    @McMissile3612 Год назад +11

    This tech tree would be a dream come true.

    • @Andrey_Gysev
      @Andrey_Gysev 3 дня назад +1

      no, its missing Yaks!
      Yak-25K and Yak-36! Both were produced and flown!

    • @McMissile3612
      @McMissile3612 3 дня назад

      @Andrey_Gysev yes those also need to be added

  • @TomatoSaucy
    @TomatoSaucy Год назад +39

    Did you do the American tech tree yet? Super stoked to see the (educated guess) AIr top tier tree especially the F-111 and F-16C :)

    • @FXIIBeaver
      @FXIIBeaver Год назад +5

      The F-111 is soon to be passed.

    • @jnlk2505
      @jnlk2505 Год назад +5

      They should add south Korean and Turkish vehicles to the US tech tree since gaijin wants to fuck over the US with the m1a2T coming to chinese tree

    • @TomatoSaucy
      @TomatoSaucy Год назад +1

      @@jnlk2505 Also some other countries such as the Singaporean F-5S (personal benefit)

    • @unlockingsnow73
      @unlockingsnow73 Год назад +7

      @jnlk2505 south Korea should go to Japan. If anyone doesn't like it, they can go speak to TEC about it and have a cry.

    • @braedynhoward3644
      @braedynhoward3644 Год назад

      @@jnlk2505 fr

  • @missel-skibidi
    @missel-skibidi 3 месяца назад +2

    This video is quite accurate! the su24m is being added and i cant wait for it!

    • @Goof-220
      @Goof-220 28 дней назад +3

      And now the su34

  • @mdrokunujjaman9944
    @mdrokunujjaman9944 3 месяца назад +2

    Bro revealed the whole russian air force and though we wouldn't notice.

  • @WeBall_1204
    @WeBall_1204 Год назад +4

    Yo I love you for making this man. Was looking forward to this lineup

  • @stealthSGMB
    @stealthSGMB Год назад +71

    Will you do a video like this for all countries in game? I think it’s a neat idea.
    EDIT: Okay you already did, but what about ground and maybe Naval?

    • @FallIntoPeace
      @FallIntoPeace Год назад +7

      He alr did that for almost every country

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад +6

      Yup! The only nations left to do are Sweden and America, then we'll move onto ground trees and more videos about nations that can come! Not where they'll go as a subtree or arguing for whether they should be a full tree in themselves, just sharing what vehicles different nations have!

    • @mlaczu8088
      @mlaczu8088 Год назад +1

      ​@@lazylime8046 when can we expect the swedish and american tech trees?

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад +3

      @@mlaczu8088 I've gotta add one vehicle to the American tree then it's good to be recorded, the Swedish tree's finishing up planning - been really busy the last week so I've not had a chance to finalize its planning stage.

    • @mlaczu8088
      @mlaczu8088 Год назад +1

      @@lazylime8046 ok, thank you

  • @LilBrutus
    @LilBrutus 7 месяцев назад +6

    Bro predicted the Su-27

    • @BruhThunderYT
      @BruhThunderYT 5 месяцев назад +2

      and the su25sm3

    • @LilBrutus
      @LilBrutus 5 месяцев назад

      @@BruhThunderYT true

    • @SwedenMapper
      @SwedenMapper 4 месяца назад +1

      And su-27sm

    • @LilBrutus
      @LilBrutus 4 месяца назад

      @JustAviation20 Well yeah it juat got added

    • @Commander_X35
      @Commander_X35 2 месяца назад

      And su 24

  • @WurstWesen82
    @WurstWesen82 Год назад +21

    Super Video Mat. Thank you. But you don't have to apologize for the video being so long. Future Tech tree videos are longer depending on the nation. For me it can also be an hour long - explained a bit more relaxed and even more detailed.

  • @yote_mercenary
    @yote_mercenary 7 дней назад +2

    Aged pretty well

  • @homefront1999
    @homefront1999 Год назад +5

    For April fools we need to get something like a future North Korean Tree. Just have it lined up with nothing but Ace Combat planes and their insane stats. Nothing like having 200+ AA missiles.

  • @lepood
    @lepood 10 месяцев назад +1

    the only reason I trust is that gaijin really added the f-15 and su-27

  • @Sakki007
    @Sakki007 Год назад +2

    Oh yes I can't wait to fight Su 57 in my Saab105G

  • @alexmaximus9134
    @alexmaximus9134 Год назад +2

    First time seeing your channel. And i absolutely loved this video. Amazing work.

  • @Korzh14228
    @Korzh14228 Год назад +3

    Когда-нибудь мои внуки откроют су57 и т90мс....

  • @IllustriousUnknown416
    @IllustriousUnknown416 Год назад +5

    A tech tree MiG-21PFM or a MiG-21S should be a must. Maybe a MiG-21S with its correct R-11 engine (or even a MiG-21PF with a cannon pod, like some of the later ones were retrofitted with). But USSR needs a transition between the early MiG-21F-13 and the SMT.
    *Also, more MiG-17s (F, PF) and 19s (S, SV) are welcomed

    • @miquelescribanoivars5049
      @miquelescribanoivars5049 Год назад +2

      Not holding my breath, but I would love the PFS with the forward hinged cockpit, GP-9 capability and SPS system. Also I hope we will see the RS2-US missiles at some point, even if they would be terrible in-game

    • @IllustriousUnknown416
      @IllustriousUnknown416 Год назад +1

      @@miquelescribanoivars5049 100% agreed

  • @acelohan
    @acelohan Год назад +1

    The thing is in this list, none real bomber added, even when Soviet have tons of them, Tu-22, Tu-95, Tu-160,...

  • @nichendrix
    @nichendrix 3 месяца назад +1

    What I would love would be a Brazilian or Latin American tech tree. Both Brazil and Latin Ame ica has a very interesting mix of planes. Tanks, and ships and boats.

  • @isaacjensen7859
    @isaacjensen7859 Год назад +4

    Radar:🚫
    Raider:✅

  • @unlockingsnow73
    @unlockingsnow73 Год назад +16

    Would be nice to see su47 and su37 as some kind of event vehcile or premium.
    Would be nicer as tech tree vehcile.
    Also where would the su75 checkmate go if you had to estimate?

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад +2

      The Su-47 and Su-37 cannot come to the game as they were not military vehicles, they were simply technology demonstrators never meant for any kind of service. The Su-47 was also never armed and never capable of being armed.
      The Su-75 hasn't even had a first flight yet nor had more than a mockup seen, so we decided not to implement it. It would probably go under the Su-57 if I had to guess, since it has a lot of the same systems and parts but it's smaller and would probably be fitted with a newer radar (though these are all guesses assuming it ever enters service, which it most likely won't)

    • @mab2187
      @mab2187 Год назад +4

      @@lazylime8046 We have quite a few vehicle that nvr went into service, hell they weren't even completed, E-100 as e.g. but this is a game and we wanna have these vehicles. 37 and 47 aren't as aggregious as F-16AJ in Japan. A proposal was implemented! Why can't fully funcitonal prototypes and the weapons we know they would've mounted, theres no weapon they would've had that we are unaware of.

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад +1

      ​@@mab2187 Because they aren't prototypes and they wouldn't have mounted anything - because the Su-37 and Su-47 weren't prototypes. They were technology demonstrators.

    • @mab2187
      @mab2187 Год назад +10

      @@lazylime8046 would, could, should, its a game bruh, just have fun with these.

    • @uhhhhh..i-like-guns
      @uhhhhh..i-like-guns Год назад

      @@mab2187conut

  • @STRYKER1467
    @STRYKER1467 Год назад +12

    You are the only one whos making true content about russian forces without being biased by NATO and ukraine thats some dedication & bravery only a very few have to talk about everything from a neutral point.

  • @abdellahiehreimo3402
    @abdellahiehreimo3402 Год назад +2

    Well made video bro well done this is a masterpiece and we all love ur content.
    But u forgot the Tu16 badger bomber with 9000 kg bomb lol and yak 25 and many other Soviet planes that could be added

  • @zenki_ls400
    @zenki_ls400 Год назад +1

    dont forget the MIG-31 could also carry the KH-47 Kinzhal hypersonic missile which would be a really cool addition with its long range and it being almost impossible to intercept we would get the 700kg conventional warhead most likley since i dont think a "low yield" nuclear warhead would be fair as a nuke option since it travels at Mach 6 almost

  • @skyer1232
    @skyer1232 Год назад +2

    I could also add Su-37 after or before Su-35S or in Su-30s line, Su-47 as event or premium and Su-75 to MiG line

    • @danielelombardo8196
      @danielelombardo8196 Год назад +1

      Too early for the su-75. It hasn't even started air trials yet

  • @pedromaurutto
    @pedromaurutto Год назад +3

    Personally, I can't wait for the SU-30.

  • @kajmak64bit76
    @kajmak64bit76 Год назад +2

    My theory which makes sense is that they may skip MiG-29S and just go to MiG-29SM and then later add the SMT
    SM is basically an S that has access to TV and Laser guided things... and idk if this is SM specific but it can also use the central / fuselage pylon for other things not just a drop tank
    So i think they should either skip the S and go to SM and then SMT which is an SM but muuuch more fat for extra fuel
    ( T in the name stands for "Toplivo" which is russian for fuel it"s same thing as MiG-21SMT )
    Or they can add the S... then SM and then SMT all in a folder or S + SM / SMT folder
    Or S / SM folder and SMT separate?

  • @rowanyuh6326
    @rowanyuh6326 Год назад +2

    Su-30sm2 after su-30sm and maybe tu22m3m would be cool

  • @nichendrix
    @nichendrix 3 месяца назад +1

    The MiG-25RB/RBK as a bomber, to me isn't a good option, it's not that good at this role.
    Its "advantage" was being able to bomb from stand off distances with dumb bombs, due to height, speed and relatively good automated bomb computer, a little like an improvised and worse version of the B-58 Hustler.
    Sukhoi and Tupolev, and a fé others, would have better options, as a jet super sonic bomber.
    I the end a tree like this and a cooperative EC mode that could not be won without fulfilling a good deal of the mission objectivesxl, and the major source of RP and SL would be performing your role, like a scoring bombers to target, inte ceptong bombers, achieving air superiority, air defense denial, CAS, etc. Not killing players for the sake of killing players, so players that go na killing spree without lending any sort of help to achieve their objectives, would take heavy penalties.
    But that's a pipe Dream, Gaijin is could never create such more, and thus, th MiG-25/31 would be newly as useless as the English Electric Lightning, and other pure inte ceptors without a place to fulfill on a 16vs16 death match.

  • @pestomystic
    @pestomystic Год назад

    Pretty good, but I think we need a T-10S-3 as a premium Rank VII. R-60M's and R-27R/T's, Zook radar, no refuel tanks, no ground armament.
    You should folder Su-27s Early and Late into one folder. Su-37 should either lead to Su-35S, or be a premium. It was the testbed for advanced avionics, electronics, and control surfaces for both the Su-35S and Su-30SM. It's basically the first of the "High Maneuverability Sukhois" as some categorize them. Lastly, you need to add the Su-47, either as a tech tree, premium, or event vehicle. It was a testbed just like the 37, for the new features that became the Su-57. Maybe even a PAK-50 as a premium too.

  • @ionutbogdanchis7250
    @ionutbogdanchis7250 Год назад +3

    And please don t forget the MFI 1.44
    and SU 47

  • @TopGunFan47
    @TopGunFan47 Год назад

    5:11 i love how you included the pic of my countries airforce lol

  • @josephthebig2889
    @josephthebig2889 Год назад +1

    The Su27s will most likely not be all in the attacker line but on the fighter line as well and it won't end with just mig 29 then mig 35, since the F16 is also on the American and many other countries fighter line and it can also carry ground attack. Most likely the Su57 will also end on the mig 29 line as they want as many planes as possible before getting a 5th gen fighter jet which they will also do for the Americans.

  • @Echos_ofpengu
    @Echos_ofpengu Год назад +1

    I think the su 27-47 will be in the fighter line not in the heavy attacker line

  • @krower11
    @krower11 Год назад +2

    To be honest. The Su-25k grinder was a good investment. The Russian tree is in a good situation and gets a lot of attention from the developers.

  • @DjellonPalatzzi
    @DjellonPalatzzi Год назад +26

    20 HOURS😭😭😭

  • @lavamerkaENG
    @lavamerkaENG Год назад +2

    When I first time saw yak 131 I was fascinated by it

    • @US.NVG.
      @US.NVG. 3 месяца назад

      honestly, looks nothing "Russian" styled

  • @cleverlaziness
    @cleverlaziness Год назад +2

    I would give my heart and soul for an SU-37 in an event

  • @mycatiscute1658
    @mycatiscute1658 Год назад +1

    I didn't sleep to watch the video, I already drank 3 liters of coffee

  • @MrUzbaba
    @MrUzbaba Год назад +1

    I think when the 5th gens will be added in the game the SU-75 will be more than an prototype so there is a possibility that it will be added as well.

  • @Scorchluck
    @Scorchluck Год назад +1

    You forgot about the MiG-31K - it would be fun to throw a missile into a neighboring game (I mean a neighboring game in Steam, not a neighboring battle)

  • @Russão000
    @Russão000 Год назад +1

    At this time i think gaijin only will Add (maybe) a Better MiG-29 Variant to Fight with the F-14B and the Su-27 that im hyped asf to fight the F-16 and F-14B
    i want to see the MiG-25 and the Su-34

  • @ctcrusader7479
    @ctcrusader7479 Год назад +1

    6:44 The Su-25TM could replace its gun pods with flare pods.

  • @petrussaukkonen6048
    @petrussaukkonen6048 Год назад +1

    the su33 su30 and su27 gonna be sick

  • @ATF.USA-23718
    @ATF.USA-23718 Год назад +1

    I hope the su 27m will be added as a premium

  • @ikea_manager_pok
    @ikea_manager_pok Год назад +1

    great video as always!

  • @dragonlord2451
    @dragonlord2451 2 дня назад

    here a year later, and i still think this list is going to be close.

  • @svx4477
    @svx4477 Год назад +1

    the MiG-25 bombers would go crazy

  • @Mycikakat
    @Mycikakat Год назад +1

    America:
    "Am i a joke to you?"

  • @NoMercyt99
    @NoMercyt99 Год назад +1

    I would also like to see later Versions of the R-27 Almos missile in game.
    The R-27EA for example would be a Active guided missile with a much larger range.
    The most interesting and outstanding missile would be the R-27EP.
    A Variant with a passive seeker which means it would basically be a anti radiation missile but against air targets.
    It would be most effective against AWACS planes but it would be alao interesting to see it be fired on 5th gen aircraft.

  • @ФёдорБарщевский

    The video is just super, but I have a small suggestion. It could be added as a premium aircraft to the 8th rank of the SU-47. This is an extremely interesting machine with the appearance of a space ship , so I think it would be very popular in the game
    (I apologize in advance for my poor English, and therefore I have to write through a translator)

  • @SeSmokki
    @SeSmokki Год назад +2

    Knowing Su-57's realistic capabilities, it should be placed in BR 2.1

  • @lil_sweden2323
    @lil_sweden2323 Год назад +1

    I think adding of these vehicles is possible only if gaijin will do massive br decopression and edit of br for su25s, a10s and other more modern CAS planes, i mean 11.3 su39 ?

  • @stanleylt20385
    @stanleylt20385 Год назад

    Su-30 is like an F-15E, its a ground/naval strike version of the Su-27, still being able to do air to air combat plus the ability to carry air to ground weapons like anti ship missiles (Kh-35, P-800 oniks, brahmos,...), KABs, air to ground missiles like kh-31 (all variants) and Kh-59

    • @thesupreme8062
      @thesupreme8062 Год назад

      Eh comparing an su 30 to the f15e is an insult

    • @stanleylt20385
      @stanleylt20385 Год назад

      @@thesupreme8062 ability wise not performance wise tho

    • @thesupreme8062
      @thesupreme8062 Год назад

      @@stanleylt20385 i mean the f15e is an infinetly more effective aircraft.

    • @stanleylt20385
      @stanleylt20385 Год назад +1

      @@thesupreme8062 i mean this is not a comparison, the su-30 can do pretty much the same things the f15e can do.

    • @stanleylt20385
      @stanleylt20385 Год назад

      @@thesupreme8062 besides, we all know how good your beloved f15e perform so no need to justify it again.

  • @ibum4908
    @ibum4908 Год назад +1

    BRO WHAT WAS THAT INTRO!
    I NEED SAUCE!

  • @splezo1927
    @splezo1927 Год назад +1

    It would be fun to see this with the other nations in the game, like the USA, Germany, Sweden, etc.

    • @FoloQ
      @FoloQ Год назад +1

      He has them already
      Russia was his only outdated one

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад

      @@FoloQ Nah Sweden and America are also outdated, America's pretty much finished production but I need to get to making Sweden.

  • @sid-et7
    @sid-et7 Год назад +1

    what abt the Tu-95, and Tu-22 and the Tu-22M/M2/M3 ?

  • @tothmatyas2177
    @tothmatyas2177 Год назад +3

    I would like some really fast aircraft (mig-25;su-24) but then we would need some bigger maps (for size like the Danish sim map)
    edit: have you submitted these tech trees (Israel; Russia;china) to Gaijin? I mean you should they are outstanding; detailed

  • @Parthemonium
    @Parthemonium Год назад

    If Tech Tree's become this large I'm voting for a split tree like with the Navy Trees.

  • @leonaleksandermaki3848
    @leonaleksandermaki3848 11 месяцев назад +1

    theese things have been correct so far

  • @Dark_Productions
    @Dark_Productions Год назад +1

    If su47 isn't in there I'll be sad

    • @aenodarr7936
      @aenodarr7936 Год назад

      Probably a marathon/battlepass addition, cause it's only 1 prototype

    • @stevenortiz9008
      @stevenortiz9008 Год назад

      ​@@aenodarr7936so it can be added

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад

      @@aenodarr7936 It wasn't a prototype, it was a tech demonstrator - one that was never armed and never even had a radar.

    • @Dark_Productions
      @Dark_Productions Год назад

      @@lazylime8046 there was one mockup with missile bay and it could carry a large amount of missiles in it

  • @thomasw695
    @thomasw695 Год назад +1

    I cant wait to see su 27s in the game

  • @danielmorgan1118
    @danielmorgan1118 Год назад +1

    Plz make a video on the US tech tree as well

  • @APolishedTurd
    @APolishedTurd Год назад

    Su-57 gets added.
    Only 7 can be in the air at any given time in simulator and realism battles and friendly AA has to shoot one down every time.

    • @ferrous3262
      @ferrous3262 Год назад

      not funny

    • @APolishedTurd
      @APolishedTurd Год назад

      @@ferrous3262 Right.
      It’s real 🤣

    • @discordiangangster
      @discordiangangster 10 месяцев назад +1

      F-22 & 35 gets added to the game, 2 has to crash every match, other has to get friendly fired by canadian radars😂😂😂

    • @Niko_rj
      @Niko_rj 6 месяцев назад

      There is 22 Su 57 ir RUAF.
      In this case F35 should fall in any light wind, and also there should be only one HSTVL, ADATS (on bradley) per team.

    • @APolishedTurd
      @APolishedTurd 6 месяцев назад

      @@Niko_rj 1 in 2021
      +6 in 2022
      +3 in 2023
      So far +0 in 2024 does not equal 22 friend.

  • @Zhoomer_radical
    @Zhoomer_radical Год назад

    4th gen can be milked for ages adding new f-15, f-16, f-18, su-27/30, mig-29, etc variants every patch

  • @samuraisoros5846
    @samuraisoros5846 Год назад +1

    Make video like this on tanks would be interesting

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад +1

      We'll be waiting until after this upcoming update to make ground trees - I've made a couple already but I'm waiting to update them since the next update will be primarily ground-focused.

  • @carltoncarter9559
    @carltoncarter9559 Год назад +1

    I thought the mig-35 was equipped with an AESA radar or is that an upgrade version of it?
    edit: nvm I went back and heard him mention it

  • @haruka0002
    @haruka0002 Год назад +1

    I will be dead when this is released

  • @Kankakee4243
    @Kankakee4243 Год назад +2

    When will you do USA Air and German air?

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад

      Both are already done and uploaded!

  • @SuwatWatjinda
    @SuwatWatjinda Год назад

    I think MiG-25P early should be event vehicle rank 7
    And Su-25TM could be rank 8 because short-range & medium-range Air-to-Air Missile full options

  • @SaltySkylerr
    @SaltySkylerr Год назад +2

    You're telling me you want to put the world's fastest jet fighter in Rank 6? Will literally never happen. We already have to deal with F-104's going only Mach 1.3-1.5 running all game, imagine tripling that speed.

  • @mr_kb1420
    @mr_kb1420 Год назад +1

    I’d love to see the Yak 130

  • @nighttide3079
    @nighttide3079 Год назад

    We better get the SU-27 T-10 variant as some sort of event vehicle

  • @qittfthegame6128
    @qittfthegame6128 Год назад

    I wanted to choose American tech tree on every kind of tech tree vehicle but they limited the amount of crews and have to use golden eagle to expand.

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад

      Don't play America to be honest, it's really weak in air and ground.

    • @DerDrecksack87
      @DerDrecksack87 10 месяцев назад

      ​​@@lazylime8046 i dont know about air but i hear the F16 is pretty capable, on ground the US is pretty good especially at 11.3 and above with the Abrams variants, they are behind germany/sweden who are dominant at top tier atm and pretty much on par with russia, nothing like italy, japan & france and partially england who are objectively not nearly as good, with israel being somwehere between the top 4 nations & the mentioned weaker nations.

  • @coldenttube9904
    @coldenttube9904 Год назад

    Everyone be talking about modern su aircraft only or high tier migs
    I am just happy with the idea of good old su-15

  • @stevenkravitz6377
    @stevenkravitz6377 Год назад

    I would think that 5th gen aircraft would probably be considered to be rank IX.

  • @cosmicbass
    @cosmicbass Год назад +1

    just so I don’t get it twisted, this is basically just a prediction right?

    • @vidbobanec8384
      @vidbobanec8384 Год назад +1

      Yes

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад +2

      Yes and no, it's mostly just going over what can come to the game with a rough outline on where stuff will go

  • @jeremyricq8751
    @jeremyricq8751 Год назад

    I wonder where SU-47 and Mikoyan Project 1.44 would go.

  • @jameshopkins5702
    @jameshopkins5702 Год назад

    What they should do is look into Consol systems because I can dump 40 different flares chef and regular pitch. My plane cut. My afterburners and missiles will find me every single time I can’t avoid them ever there’s something wrong with that I fire missiles I see three or four flares pop out my missile goes for the flares I never hit the enemy people say skill issue. If so, then let’s play together show me how

  • @justsavv6378
    @justsavv6378 Год назад

    im hoping the su 47 will be added to it will probably be a premium but if it is it will be the first premium i buy

    • @STRYKER1467
      @STRYKER1467 Год назад

      Due to the upcoming update i had a short review and realized theres no Su-37 either.

  • @funi_chest
    @funi_chest Год назад

    mig25 as such a low BR rank would create the same issue with low-ish tier 104s where they can run all game and waste the 25mins. just smt to keep in mind when balancing such aircraft

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 Год назад +1

      MiG-25 is like less capable then F-104 lol

  • @id_Usher
    @id_Usher Год назад

    A lot of mistakes. For example, the MiG-23 BIS, there was no such aircraft. There were only MiG-23M, MiG-23MS, Mig-23ML, Mig-23MLD. And export variations. There was no modification of the BIS.

  • @dustin2264
    @dustin2264 Год назад

    @matAWG I see you have the su 57 at the bottom but we're is the designated call sign (terminator) I don't see it

  • @IceMarsoc77
    @IceMarsoc77 Год назад

    you forgot one on the list the SU-47 Berkut

  • @oort84
    @oort84 Год назад

    MiG-23bis? Where does it come from?
    This tree looks like how it might look like in the "close" future, not in perspective

  • @sanmiguel4774
    @sanmiguel4774 Год назад +2

    I would like to see the su47 berkut

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад

      Unfortunately that's not a Russian Aeroforce vehicle, that was a Sukhoi technology demonstrator. It's technically a civilian aircraft since it was never armed, didn't have a radar and wasn't intended to ever be used in combat.

    • @stevenortiz9008
      @stevenortiz9008 Год назад

      ​@@lazylime8046event vehicle should be fine then

    • @lazylime8046
      @lazylime8046 Год назад

      @@stevenortiz9008 No, it wouldn't have any armament at all. You wouldn't be able to do anything.

  • @joshy9464
    @joshy9464 Год назад

    Still hoping for a functional CIWS that shoots down both planes and guided missiles

  • @appa609
    @appa609 Год назад

    Su-37 event would be sick

  • @ATF.USA-23718
    @ATF.USA-23718 8 месяцев назад

    I hope they add the mig 41 with the ram jet version as premium and the turbine jet version as tech tree also the role of the jet is a stealth interceptor aircraft its and for its speed Mach 4 to Mach 5 and equipped with an anti-missile laser, weapons will be lazer weapons hypersonic missiles and anti satellite missiles

  • @a.m.k101
    @a.m.k101 20 часов назад

    Russian tech tree can get more premiums like the projects that they had with Iran or even India. Shafaq Training jet is an example.

  • @Commander_X35
    @Commander_X35 2 месяца назад

    Su 75 would be rank 10 with su 57 and it would be cool if they added su 47

  • @いんぬ-b1t
    @いんぬ-b1t Год назад +1

    I'd like the Japanese version, please!

  • @rootkitz2116
    @rootkitz2116 Год назад

    Okay, now how many classified documents that we needed for these?

  • @ghostofthepotato8143
    @ghostofthepotato8143 Год назад +1

    Can you do one for all the nations?

  • @matthewriley4935
    @matthewriley4935 Год назад

    I've seen a Su35 fly irl and just...wow

  • @Twilightss
    @Twilightss Год назад

    who is telling him the Su-39 is literally the Su-25TM

    • @Twilightss
      @Twilightss Год назад

      its also LITERALLY named su_25tm in the files