Non skippable ads disabled for your viewing pleasure. In this video, I go over which to choose and why. Buy with these links to support the channel Sony A7R5: amzn.to/3DjF4ga or bhpho.to/3zmoevZ Sony A7iv: amzn.to/3DAZhPS or bhpho.to/3DBeLDu
Thank you for that, I bought an A7 iv to replace my A99ii, which is a fantastic camera, but sadly the last of a line. I got the LAEA5 adapter so I could carry on using my collection of A-mount lenses, including lots of cheap Minolta lenses. The A7 iv has been great. The low-light performance is amazing. You can shoot a little bird in the shadows at ISO 12,800 and get a good image, With good post to reduce noise, even better. Then the A7R v came out to rave reviews and I got a sad case of buyer's remorse. Your review fixed that.
I shoot content for band, and the images I capture are viewed only on social media (and likely mostly on phones). So as much as I would LOVE to have an A7RV, my A7III is perfectly capable. It is good enough that I just bought a second body from the used market. The money I have "saved" I put into lenses, lighting, etc.
@@user-eu2me4bp7j for the same money a9, but a7iii basically a gimped a9 so. A used a7iii can be had for under 1k. Minimal difference between the two. A9 is sports oriented.
@few boys cooking channel Outdoors in daylight, honestly an iPhone would be more than sufficient. Heck, the phone works pretty well in low light. The only real reasons to use a full frame mirrorless camera would be if you wanted/needed the flexibility of different lenses (wider or longer, brighter/faster). Don't worry about so much about the video; anything can do it. Put your attention on audio, because _that_ is what will make your content better.
I started taking photos in the early 80's using my brand new Canon AE1P. Then in the early early 2002 I purchased a brand new digital Nikon D100. All the photojournalist were super jealous. Since then I've used the D200 and D800. And...now I'm looking to purchase either the Sony A7RV or the A7IV. Currently I use my photo skills to take pictures of homeless dogs and cats to find their furever homes. So.....my evaluation continues. Thank you for all your informative videos. Big Bruno
As a still shooter and hobbyist, I noticed the only crucial difference were IBIS and Resolution, and everything else almost same. For the price I bought a7iv and never regret
Thank you for the sanity. I always come to your channel to cure my G.A.S. If it is curable at all, I know you will help my symptoms. Keep making these videos, they are great.
I am very happy with the A74. Sure there are a couple of features of the V that I would like the IV to have but there is always is a shiny object you would like.
I have been bouncing back and forth between the two for almost a week, great review this definitely helped. I am thinking the a7iv is more than enough for what I need.
Great commentary on the comparison between these two. I'm in the same boat. Got the A7IV and have been happy with it. Yes I like this new camera but don't really need it. And tired of all the money lost when selling used gear. Going to wait for the next round of either A1 or A7c.
I have both. The A7R V specs are good, but after being used to the A7 IV, I find the A7R V limiting. The specific issue is the low light performance. I do a lot of work with the A7 IV set for 6400 ISO, rarely above, nowhere near the max of 51200. I didn't consider the A7R V max of 32000 to be a significant limitation as I would be well below it. At 6400 ISO the A7R V's noise is noticeable. I did some side by side tests, exact same setting and lens. At the overall image both were equal but as one got closer into the details, A7 IV was turning out more usable detail despite the lower pixel count. At ISO 3200 the A7R V did better, but the A7 IV as no worse and maybe still a hair better. The A7R V really had to get down to ISO 1600 to start to shine. At that point the A7R V could resolve slightly better than the A7 IV.
Thank you for doing this comparison, I swear you read my mind! I was thinking the same thing when Sony trotted out the A7R5, it's expensive, but love the flip out screen (I have the A7R4 and wish it had the flip out screen), that said was thinking get instead of the A7IV because of the flip out screen, I think the R5's new additions however make it a good upgrade, I shoot mainly landscapes, the 8 stop stabilization is intriguing, as well as the new pix shift. Thnx again!
I'm waiting for more Sony cameras to inherit the a7RV's 8 stop of stabilization and the excellent multi articulating screen. But the price jump from when I bought from a7RIII is what's keeping me back. I'll probably hold and see what the a7CII offers. The 8 stop is useful for travel videos. I use my cameras mostly for travel.
sadly, the ZV-E1 didnt inherit the screen or the ibis, I think that will be reserved for only the high end models like the A7v, Siv, A1 mk ii, A9 mk iii.
My good man, I too have/enjoy the R3. Decided to get a7iv and having two bodies is amazing. Shoot way more now that I don't have to change lens continously lol
Photography is just a hobby to me. Sold my Fuji xh1 for a A7iv and very happy with Sony. Only things I missed from my xh1 is bring able to go beyond 30s with a lead and focus bracketing. Staying with A7iv.
I own the a7iv I think at the very least they could reduce the 4K 60 crop to like 1.2x 1.3x or 1.4x instead of 1.5x they did a smaller crop for the a7rv so I don’t see why they couldn’t reduce on the a7iv it’s the very least they could do to help them and there customers or maybe remove or make a mark 2 I reckon if we work together they will have to listen and make a change and with your large platform and influence would really help if you could spread the idea around thx
IMO they didn't because they damn well knew it would stop people from buying the other video centric cameras. Most seem to enjoy doing the crop lens route to battle this for now
Yeah! You got a very good point dude! I use an A7iii now and will buy an A7iv sometime this year and keep my A7iii as my second camera cause it still takes awesome pics. Human eye don’t evolve at the rate of the technology so there is no reason to buy the latest model just for the sake of having the newest toy in your bag!
I have got my eye on the A7 iv for a while. Looking at the A7 release history the R and non R variant are released pretty close to each other. I am torn between waiting a bit for the V or get the 4 now on a discount.
I’ve had the a74 randomly overheat on me on 3 occasions during regular 4k60 recording. I’ve tried to replicate it but I can’t pinpoint the cause its just literally random. In my personal experience, not a reliable camera (depending on what/where you shoot)
I’m with an xt30 rn and i was looking to upgrade and I’m in the middel between xh2 or go in the new sony system with the a7iv and i really don’t know where to invest🙈
Top review and you made total sense. Your comment about future proofing is so right. I've liked what I have watched and read about the A7 IV and ticks most of the boxes for what I will use it for. I started the with the A7iii and was impressed when I got it almost 2 years ago.
The only thing I really care about is the EVF. I tried an A1 and that is what makes the difference for me. It is like when in the old days looking through a 35mm top level camera and looking through a Hasselblad 500/
That screen alone makes it worth the upgrade. I can't tell you how many times I try to flip out the bottom of the screen only to be frustrated that it doesn't do it. I came from Fuji and those screens were perfect for photography. I prefer the flippy screen on my FX3, but the A7iv is driving me nuts. I can't be the only one.
coming from a tilt screen, you can get use to it, but it takes time, months even. The A7R5 screen is like second nature assuming it's anything like the panasonic gh6, extremely useful and easy to use.
@@CharlieVN Thanks for the encouragement. I've had the A7iv for 6 months and have taken 5k images. Still not used to it 😔. I think I'm going to just sell the A7iv and buy the A7RV.
@RandumbTech for what reasons and did you ever pull the trigger? I've had my eyes on the 4 but the 5 I'd looking promising it'd just be higher to make my money back but maybe could land me bigger jobs? (Long term of course).
While I will be "upgrading" from an A7IV to the R5, I appreciate the video and your take on why that might not be for everyone. The 7IV is a great camera and for the price it gets into excellent territory. I'm in the YOLO camp, however. Middle age will do that to you 😞
Congrats, I'm sure to make more comparisons with that camera, so stay tuned. I'm sure you'll be very happy, and the A7iv sell off right now makes others happy as well, win win 😇
hello! i have a question maybe y cab help me, i am thinking in buy one of this bodys, you know if the white balance its the. same in both sensors? or skin tones are diferent? thanks for the video and for your time
Suppose to be better on the A7RV, but I seriously doubt it. I did a test with AWB and the Siii, which also has a dedicated WB sensor, and it made little to no difference. ruclips.net/video/LCUxTKUmlXc/видео.html
Alternatives for both the A7RV and A7IV for still photography are the cheaper Sony A7RIVA (same 60 megapixels sensor as A7RV) and Sony A7RIII (42 megapixels). I had the A7RIII and can recommend it ! I have now the A7RIV and A7RIVA and can highly recommend them, you get two cameras in one Camera with 60 megapixels because you can crop to APSC mode of you always need high resolution. I NEVER do video, so I wish Sony will make a still photography Camera !!!. For me there are only two improvements in the A7RV, the EVF and the IBIS, I do not like the new flip-out screen, I rarely use the screen.
7:22 “I’m no math genius, despite being Asian “ 😅😂❤…you made me laugh❤. Love your videos, as your practical commonsensical approach is refreshing and apropos.
Great review, I am deciding between these cameras at the moment, but I am leaning toward the A7RV just for the significant improvement when paired with my 100-400GM or 200-600 for wildlife. And I agree that 60mp doesnt mean you crop in 50% and get the same quality photo as compared to the A7IV, but it does still give me more options with my prime lenses, especially the 24 1.4 GM to crop in a lot more
Bonjour. C'est une vidéo adressée au possesseur de l'A7 IV. Dès le départ, on devine ton intention et tu ne mets en avant que des arguments subjectifs, en faveur de l'A7 IV.
Been on my a7iii about 3 years, needless I kinda been wanting to upgrade to a more portrait camera like the R series, but after I tested out the a7 r IV, I thought it would be a major waste of money cause I barley noticed the differences, I’m still waiting to jump but the jump has to be a major shift in quality. I more then likely might just jump the the A7IV since I can save money and get fixes from the problems from the A7iii.
The A7iv is a major jump unlike the R4. Shift in quality will be unlikely, cameras are near their limits, bigger sensor if you want noticeable increase in quality.
Your valuable information saved me a minimum $1.5K as I will not be upgrading my A7IV to a A7RV - so what I will do; is purchase a 2X teleconverter for my 70-200GM and feel like I got a cool tasty treat and use the sh*t out of this A7IV in hopes I will be worthy of a; A7RVI when the time comes. Thank you!
I'm leaning towards upgrading to RV but the IV is €2450 now... I did a nifty giftcard trick at a big camera store to get €500 in giftcards so it will cost me €1950, then sell my A7III for 1250 and the new IV will be like €700 and I get over €400 taxes back... Practically a free camera now that I've typed all of this I can see what I will buy next.
With the ability to shoot small raw files at 26mp is like having both the a7iv and the a7rv in one camera. The extra price is justified for that reason
thanks for the vid and explanations. I think I would just go for a7rIV and save the money for another len from my a6500. I think the a7rIV would be enough for family travel and daily photoshoot...
Rolling shutter,rolling shutter,rolling shutter etc...My 8 years old A7RII(42Mpx) has in 4K FF 16ms,which is not so bad, A7IV RS 26.5ms -33Mpx in 2022 ufuf, and I am afraid about RS 60 Mpx A7RV...I am sad ,because otherwise I would have bought A7RV right away (AF,Viewfinder,display, 10 bit etcetc...) :-( A7IV 33Mpx is enough of course,but in APSC mode on 42 Mpx A7RII(7RIII) 18 mpx ,and 7RIV,7RV even 26 MPx I think,which is nice (wildlife,birding etc)...
In reality, your client will never know the difference between any work shot on the A7RV and the A7IV for photo or video PERIOD. Yes, The screen is amazing on the A7RV, but let's be real that should be a standard feature on EVERY sony camera. If you're a serious photographer you wouldn't be watching this video and already own the A1 and are pissed off that you don't have a dope screen that should have been on every camera 4 years ago. For someone like me who shoots mainly video but is a passionate photographer, the A7IV is way better bang for your buck considering Im not wasting 1,500 dollars. I could take a vacation at that point... you get my point.
fondamentalmente hanno aggiunto due cose molto interessanti ma hanno tralasciato la cosa più importante e che tutti i possessori di a7rIV si aspettavano : la resa ad alti ISO! in una fotocamera dedicata al portrait e paesaggistica direi che era il minimo che potevano e dovevano fare, e invece sono andati ad implemementare funzioni e caratteristiche che addirittura vanno a pestare i piedi all'attuale ammiraglia a1 e ancor di più alla a9. Sony ha sempre introdotto le novità prima di tutto sull'ammiraglia e poi nelle fotocamere degli altri segmenti...questa decisione di introdurrre queste novità sulla a7rV proprio non la condivido ,soprattutto perchè ce n'erano di cose ben più importanti da migliorare. Come la a7rIV sopra i 6400 ISO ci vorrà martello e scalpello per levigare il rumore, nel comparto video hanno aggiunto 8k e tutti ad entusiasmarsi,ma nessuno che va a vedere la qualità di questo 8k...contando che per ora la ripresa in 8k viene utilizzata per croppare in post,la qualità non è assolutamente all'altezza di altri marchi, in più è presente un rolling shutter evidentissimo che rende le riprese inutilizzabili o poco utilizzabili con panning o soggetti in movimento laterale, e ok c'è sempre il 4k,4k che fps a parte(specchietto per allodole)è uguale alla a7rIV e cioè molto più impastato del 4k della ottima a7IV e con il sempre pessimo rolling shutter(venduta la a7rIV per a1 proprio per la qualità video molto scarsa. Il tutto proposto a 4500 euro con feature video (8k e 4k 60fps)inserite più per giustificare il prezzo che per essere realmente utilizzabili in riprese dinamiche. Tutti impressinati dal sistema di messa a fuoco e nessuno che va a vedere la velocità di lettura del sensore...senza una rapida lettura del processore di un sitema af di questo tipo te ne fai gran poco in certe situazioni. bah...grande delusione. Come utilizzatore Sony fin dalla prima a7 (e come tanti altri utilizzatori e anche videomaker di fama mondiale)sono molto deluso dal comportamento di Sony. Inserire funzioni evolute su macchine dal costo decisamente inferiore alle ammiraglie e lasciar fuori le stesse ammiraglie che avrebbero diritto a queste feature è un comportamento che ha fatto arrabbiare più di qualcuno...di sicuro prima di spendere ancora tutti questi soldi in un ammiraglia che dopo pochi mesi vedo superata da una fotocamera minore ,ci penserò mille volte.
I think the bigger question is why would you buy the a1 when the a7RV is priced much better? The a7iv is the right choice for most people, amateur or professional
If you shoot sports where AF speed and frames per second matter. I have the A1. Though I primarily shoot landscape I also shoot sports (soccer, football, hockey) and capturing "the moment" in action benefits from the 20fps that I get. If they had made the r5 such that I could use the electronic shutter w/o the rolling shutter issue and get at least 10fps then I might have sold my A1 and picked up the R5. I love the new screen and the focus bracketing (for landscape). But for now I think I will wait and see if all these cool upgrades come out in the A1M2.
@@CharlieVN From Sony : Number of Pixels (Effective) Approx. 61.0 megapixels, Number of Pixels (total) Approx. 62.5 megapixels I believe Sony, not DPReview. Sony made the camera. Please get it right, Thanks
33mp is a positive for the a7iv. Not many people want 61mp. I have the a7iv and ordered the a7rv because I want 4k/60 no crop but also a good photo camera
@@BoshkaGaming yes, but I really meant I want both. The a7siii isn’t a good photo camera, and the a7iv is 1.5x crop. That’s the best camera that’s in the middle of both at the moment
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Non skippable ads disabled for your viewing pleasure.
In this video, I go over which to choose and why.
Buy with these links to support the channel
Sony A7R5: amzn.to/3DjF4ga or bhpho.to/3zmoevZ
Sony A7iv: amzn.to/3DAZhPS or bhpho.to/3DBeLDu
Thank you for that, I bought an A7 iv to replace my A99ii, which is a fantastic camera, but sadly the last of a line. I got the LAEA5 adapter so I could carry on using my collection of A-mount lenses, including lots of cheap Minolta lenses. The A7 iv has been great. The low-light performance is amazing. You can shoot a little bird in the shadows at ISO 12,800 and get a good image, With good post to reduce noise, even better. Then the A7R v came out to rave reviews and I got a sad case of buyer's remorse. Your review fixed that.
I shoot content for band, and the images I capture are viewed only on social media (and likely mostly on phones). So as much as I would LOVE to have an A7RV, my A7III is perfectly capable. It is good enough that I just bought a second body from the used market. The money I have "saved" I put into lenses, lighting, etc.
Nice
yeah... I think of upgrading, but the A7III does such an amazing job there's really no rational practical need.
@@sulev111 looking into a used camera, would you choose A9 or A7iii?
@@user-eu2me4bp7j for the same money a9, but a7iii basically a gimped a9 so. A used a7iii can be had for under 1k. Minimal difference between the two. A9 is sports oriented.
@few boys cooking channel Outdoors in daylight, honestly an iPhone would be more than sufficient. Heck, the phone works pretty well in low light. The only real reasons to use a full frame mirrorless camera would be if you wanted/needed the flexibility of different lenses (wider or longer, brighter/faster). Don't worry about so much about the video; anything can do it. Put your attention on audio, because _that_ is what will make your content better.
That punch SFX for the punch lines was priceless. Loved the review and punch lines.
Thank you Charlie for this video. I have an A74 and the GM35 and I couldn't be happier with the picture quality results.
Great to hear! amazing lens
“Like your wife’s better looking sister” lmaooo
I spilled my coffee on that one and messed up my keyboard. 🤣
I started taking photos in the early 80's using my brand new Canon AE1P. Then in the early early 2002 I purchased a brand new digital Nikon D100. All the photojournalist were super jealous. Since then I've used the D200 and D800. And...now I'm looking to purchase either the Sony A7RV or the A7IV. Currently I use my photo skills to take pictures of homeless dogs and cats to find their furever homes. So.....my evaluation continues. Thank you for all your informative videos. Big Bruno
As a still shooter and hobbyist, I noticed the only crucial difference were IBIS and Resolution, and everything else almost same. For the price I bought a7iv and never regret
also has way better low light; high iso performance
@ricosnake3591 which one?
@@videovaulttv1the a7iv has better low light performance for video, for photos both are great.
I really enjoy the guy's humor, keep the good work man
I LOVE THIS, you shot through the facts without the feelings.... god damn loved it!
I like your video, bro😊. I think you could have mentioned sensor protection as a common strength of the models 😊
I truly appreciated for educating all and your time. Thank you.
Not seeing a lot of videos like this one. Thanks for the help on deciding!
I bought them both, no more questions to ask 😄.
Thank you for the sanity. I always come to your channel to cure my G.A.S. If it is curable at all, I know you will help my symptoms. Keep making these videos, they are great.
nice rounded view of both cameras. love my a74 never wanted for 60mp.
I am very happy with the A74. Sure there are a couple of features of the V that I would like the IV to have but there is always is a shiny object you would like.
I want that screen more than anything else 😊
Would you choose this over a used A9? If so why/why not?
I have been bouncing back and forth between the two for almost a week, great review this definitely helped. I am thinking the a7iv is more than enough for what I need.
Me .too
I enjoyed this, there is a humourism sincerity about your presentation. Thanks for posting.
Great commentary on the comparison between these two. I'm in the same boat. Got the A7IV and have been happy with it. Yes I like this new camera but don't really need it. And tired of all the money lost when selling used gear. Going to wait for the next round of either A1 or A7c.
I have both. The A7R V specs are good, but after being used to the A7 IV, I find the A7R V limiting. The specific issue is the low light performance. I do a lot of work with the A7 IV set for 6400 ISO, rarely above, nowhere near the max of 51200. I didn't consider the A7R V max of 32000 to be a significant limitation as I would be well below it. At 6400 ISO the A7R V's noise is noticeable. I did some side by side tests, exact same setting and lens. At the overall image both were equal but as one got closer into the details, A7 IV was turning out more usable detail despite the lower pixel count. At ISO 3200 the A7R V did better, but the A7 IV as no worse and maybe still a hair better. The A7R V really had to get down to ISO 1600 to start to shine. At that point the A7R V could resolve slightly better than the A7 IV.
What are you shooting this video on
no word about dr in video mode? or latitude test?
Thank you for doing this comparison, I swear you read my mind! I was thinking the same thing when Sony trotted out the A7R5, it's expensive, but love the flip out screen (I have the A7R4 and wish it had the flip out screen), that said was thinking get instead of the A7IV because of the flip out screen, I think the R5's new additions however make it a good upgrade, I shoot mainly landscapes, the 8 stop stabilization is intriguing, as well as the new pix shift. Thnx again!
Awesome content, delivered to the point and fun.
I'm waiting for more Sony cameras to inherit the a7RV's 8 stop of stabilization and the excellent multi articulating screen. But the price jump from when I bought from a7RIII is what's keeping me back. I'll probably hold and see what the a7CII offers. The 8 stop is useful for travel videos. I use my cameras mostly for travel.
sadly, the ZV-E1 didnt inherit the screen or the ibis, I think that will be reserved for only the high end models like the A7v, Siv, A1 mk ii, A9 mk iii.
My good man, I too have/enjoy the R3. Decided to get a7iv and having two bodies is amazing. Shoot way more now that I don't have to change lens continously lol
Photography is just a hobby to me. Sold my Fuji xh1 for a A7iv and very happy with Sony. Only things I missed from my xh1 is bring able to go beyond 30s with a lead and focus bracketing. Staying with A7iv.
how do you even find focus bracketing usefull - when i choose points from a to b , it takes 300+ images to capture and my m1 max cant handle it ...
For filming RUclips, A7IV would be better right? Since A7IV is supposed to be better for video.
Always enjoy your Sony videos, thank you…
I own the a7iv I think at the very least they could reduce the 4K 60 crop to like 1.2x 1.3x or 1.4x instead of 1.5x they did a smaller crop for the a7rv so I don’t see why they couldn’t reduce on the a7iv it’s the very least they could do to help them and there customers or maybe remove or make a mark 2 I reckon if we work together they will have to listen and make a change and with your large platform and influence would really help if you could spread the idea around thx
IMO they didn't because they damn well knew it would stop people from buying the other video centric cameras. Most seem to enjoy doing the crop lens route to battle this for now
Marketing tactics at it's best.
I want to do still cinematic video/ moving photo type work. Is the a74 good enough?
what are the best alternatives for these cameras for photography?
I love this video!! You are so low key funny and I love that! Thank you for sharing all your info and making it fantastic to watch 😊
Yeah! You got a very good point dude! I use an A7iii now and will buy an A7iv sometime this year and keep my A7iii as my second camera cause it still takes awesome pics. Human eye don’t evolve at the rate of the technology so there is no reason to buy the latest model just for the sake of having the newest toy in your bag!
I have got my eye on the A7 iv for a while. Looking at the A7 release history the R and non R variant are released pretty close to each other.
I am torn between waiting a bit for the V or get the 4 now on a discount.
I think this trend is broken, the 7iii to 7iv was a four year stretch?
Love your videos, real world helpful info.
Which lens is better for event?
I’ve had the a74 randomly overheat on me on 3 occasions during regular 4k60 recording. I’ve tried to replicate it but I can’t pinpoint the cause its just literally random. In my personal experience, not a reliable camera (depending on what/where you shoot)
I’m with an xt30 rn and i was looking to upgrade and I’m in the middel between xh2 or go in the new sony system with the a7iv and i really don’t know where to invest🙈
Top review and you made total sense. Your comment about future proofing is so right. I've liked what I have watched and read about the A7 IV and ticks most of the boxes for what I will use it for. I started the with the A7iii and was impressed when I got it almost 2 years ago.
Another solid review sir. Going to get the A7RV after selling my R3.
you make really good down to earth and honest videos, thanks
As an astro photographer, I bought A7IV. It’s more than enough for my aplication.
Couldn't you shoot in medium raw and have the best of both?
that line about your 4 year old..... GOLD.
Agreed, A7IV is great. Power on, record, do your thing. Your mic sounds a bit muffled, great informational video nonetheless 👍
Wireless lav, definitely a downgrade compared to my typical dynamic mic, but I need to stand or else I have no energy while making these videos 😄
@@CharlieVN Yes standing works, it's more dynamic too. I don't have pressure though, no views currently 😂
The only thing I really care about is the EVF. I tried an A1 and that is what makes the difference for me. It is like when in the old days looking through a 35mm top level camera and looking through a Hasselblad 500/
Down to earth review. Thanks.
I just want the new colors/skin tones from the 7R5 in the 7M4
Have you tried adjusting your auto WB to white or ambiance?
That screen alone makes it worth the upgrade. I can't tell you how many times I try to flip out the bottom of the screen only to be frustrated that it doesn't do it. I came from Fuji and those screens were perfect for photography. I prefer the flippy screen on my FX3, but the A7iv is driving me nuts. I can't be the only one.
coming from a tilt screen, you can get use to it, but it takes time, months even. The A7R5 screen is like second nature assuming it's anything like the panasonic gh6, extremely useful and easy to use.
@@CharlieVN Thanks for the encouragement. I've had the A7iv for 6 months and have taken 5k images. Still not used to it 😔. I think I'm going to just sell the A7iv and buy the A7RV.
@RandumbTech for what reasons and did you ever pull the trigger? I've had my eyes on the 4 but the 5 I'd looking promising it'd just be higher to make my money back but maybe could land me bigger jobs? (Long term of course).
Thank you for your ruthless honesty ❤
Good arguments. I will keep an eye on your channel
While I will be "upgrading" from an A7IV to the R5, I appreciate the video and your take on why that might not be for everyone. The 7IV is a great camera and for the price it gets into excellent territory. I'm in the YOLO camp, however. Middle age will do that to you 😞
Congrats, I'm sure to make more comparisons with that camera, so stay tuned. I'm sure you'll be very happy, and the A7iv sell off right now makes others happy as well, win win 😇
May I ask what make your decision to R5? I sold my R6 and planning to switch to Sony 😅
hello! i have a question maybe y cab help me, i am thinking in buy one of this bodys, you know if the white balance its the. same in both sensors? or skin tones are diferent? thanks for the video and for your time
Suppose to be better on the A7RV, but I seriously doubt it. I did a test with AWB and the Siii, which also has a dedicated WB sensor, and it made little to no difference. ruclips.net/video/LCUxTKUmlXc/видео.html
@@CharlieVN thanks for the answer and the link!
All I require is the guts of the a7rv but with stacked 30mp sensor and the A1 mechanical shutter
Alternatives for both the A7RV and A7IV for still photography are the cheaper Sony A7RIVA (same 60 megapixels sensor as A7RV) and Sony A7RIII (42 megapixels). I had the A7RIII and can recommend it ! I have now the A7RIV and A7RIVA and can highly recommend them, you get two cameras in one Camera with 60 megapixels because you can crop to APSC mode of you always need high resolution. I NEVER do video, so I wish Sony will make a still photography Camera !!!. For me there are only two improvements in the A7RV, the EVF and the IBIS, I do not like the new flip-out screen, I rarely use the screen.
I'm happy with my A74 with 35GM :D
When are we going to see these features on the Alpha 1 - via firmware update?
about the same time the Siii gets firmware updates 😁
Features maybe,but bigger 3.2 inch 2.1 MPx 4 axis never, only 3inch 1.44Mpx,btw.the same display on flagship A1 as my 8 old years A7RII,ufuf:-(
7:22 “I’m no math genius, despite being Asian “ 😅😂❤…you made me laugh❤. Love your videos, as your practical commonsensical approach is refreshing and apropos.
"Like my wife's better looking sister."
🤣🤣🤣
Instant sub!
What a God!
Great review, I am deciding between these cameras at the moment, but I am leaning toward the A7RV just for the significant improvement when paired with my 100-400GM or 200-600 for wildlife. And I agree that 60mp doesnt mean you crop in 50% and get the same quality photo as compared to the A7IV, but it does still give me more options with my prime lenses, especially the 24 1.4 GM to crop in a lot more
Bonjour. C'est une vidéo adressée au possesseur de l'A7 IV. Dès le départ, on devine ton intention et tu ne mets en avant que des arguments subjectifs, en faveur de l'A7 IV.
Parce que sa femme ne veut pas qu'il achète l' A7RV...
Been on my a7iii about 3 years, needless I kinda been wanting to upgrade to a more portrait camera like the R series, but after I tested out the a7 r IV, I thought it would be a major waste of money cause I barley noticed the differences, I’m still waiting to jump but the jump has to be a major shift in quality. I more then likely might just jump the the A7IV since I can save money and get fixes from the problems from the A7iii.
The A7iv is a major jump unlike the R4. Shift in quality will be unlikely, cameras are near their limits, bigger sensor if you want noticeable increase in quality.
Your valuable information saved me a minimum $1.5K as I will not be upgrading my A7IV to a A7RV - so what I will do; is purchase a 2X teleconverter for my 70-200GM and feel like I got a cool tasty treat and use the sh*t out of this A7IV in hopes I will be worthy of a; A7RVI when the time comes. Thank you!
lol love the sarcastic funny comments you put in your review 🙂
Great video
Which product gives you a better image quality/resolution?
A7R5
"I'm no math genius despite being Asian" I found my long lost brother 👍
Great advice!
Liked as soon as you made the sister joke 😆
🤫🤫🤫
This was a very informative, entertaining, and easy to swallow video. Great content! 👍🏼
I'm leaning towards upgrading to RV but the IV is €2450 now... I did a nifty giftcard trick at a big camera store to get €500 in giftcards so it will cost me €1950, then sell my A7III for 1250 and the new IV will be like €700 and I get over €400 taxes back... Practically a free camera now that I've typed all of this I can see what I will buy next.
What did you get?
@@hans6304 A7RV in the end and kept the A7III lol
@@jeroenvdw that's a brave move, my friend! Guess I'll do that too lolol
@@jeroenvdw gotta love that tiltable screen.
Couple things that weren't mentioned and important for many users is ISO performance and dynamic range. A7IV crushes the A7RV in those aspects.
Doubtful
The bigest drawback of both cameras, no stacked sensor. Ever used a stacked sensor?
With the ability to shoot small raw files at 26mp is like having both the a7iv and the a7rv in one camera. The extra price is justified for that reason
subbed. i love the occasional wifey jokes in between, though not trying to encourage it
Sony is slacking on the speed at this point it should be 15fps minimum for their entry level offering.
thanks for the vid and explanations.
I think I would just go for a7rIV and save the money for another len from my a6500.
I think the a7rIV would be enough for family travel and daily photoshoot...
Thanks for sharing!
Rolling shutter,rolling shutter,rolling shutter etc...My 8 years old A7RII(42Mpx) has in 4K FF 16ms,which is not so bad, A7IV RS 26.5ms -33Mpx in 2022 ufuf, and I am afraid about RS 60 Mpx A7RV...I am sad ,because otherwise I would have bought A7RV right away (AF,Viewfinder,display, 10 bit etcetc...) :-( A7IV 33Mpx is enough of course,but in APSC mode on 42 Mpx A7RII(7RIII) 18 mpx ,and 7RIV,7RV even 26 MPx I think,which is nice (wildlife,birding etc)...
it's a shame, thankfully, there are some alternatives like the A1/A9's and even M43 if willing to go down that rabbit hole.
In reality, your client will never know the difference between any work shot on the A7RV and the A7IV for photo or video PERIOD.
Yes, The screen is amazing on the A7RV, but let's be real that should be a standard feature on EVERY sony camera. If you're a serious photographer you wouldn't be watching this video and already own the A1 and are pissed off that you don't have a dope screen that should have been on every camera 4 years ago.
For someone like me who shoots mainly video but is a passionate photographer, the A7IV is way better bang for your buck considering Im not wasting 1,500 dollars. I could take a vacation at that point... you get my point.
Bro you're hilarious.
Hey bro you chinese or taiwanese?
Vietnamese 😄
fondamentalmente hanno aggiunto due cose molto interessanti ma hanno tralasciato la cosa più importante e che tutti i possessori di a7rIV si aspettavano : la resa ad alti ISO!
in una fotocamera dedicata al portrait e paesaggistica direi che era il minimo che potevano e dovevano fare, e invece sono andati ad implemementare funzioni e caratteristiche che addirittura vanno a pestare i piedi all'attuale ammiraglia a1 e ancor di più alla a9.
Sony ha sempre introdotto le novità prima di tutto sull'ammiraglia e poi nelle fotocamere degli altri segmenti...questa decisione di introdurrre queste novità sulla a7rV proprio non la condivido ,soprattutto perchè ce n'erano di cose ben più importanti da migliorare.
Come la a7rIV sopra i 6400 ISO ci vorrà martello e scalpello per levigare il rumore, nel comparto video hanno aggiunto 8k e tutti ad entusiasmarsi,ma nessuno che va a vedere la qualità di questo 8k...contando che per ora la ripresa in 8k viene utilizzata per croppare in post,la qualità non è assolutamente all'altezza di altri marchi, in più è presente un rolling shutter evidentissimo che rende le riprese inutilizzabili o poco utilizzabili con panning o soggetti in movimento laterale, e ok c'è sempre il 4k,4k che fps a parte(specchietto per allodole)è uguale alla a7rIV e cioè molto più impastato del 4k della ottima a7IV e con il sempre pessimo rolling shutter(venduta la a7rIV per a1 proprio per la qualità video molto scarsa.
Il tutto proposto a 4500 euro con feature video (8k e 4k 60fps)inserite più per giustificare il prezzo che per essere realmente utilizzabili in riprese dinamiche.
Tutti impressinati dal sistema di messa a fuoco e nessuno che va a vedere la velocità di lettura del sensore...senza una rapida lettura del processore di un sitema af di questo tipo te ne fai gran poco in certe situazioni.
bah...grande delusione. Come utilizzatore Sony fin dalla prima a7 (e come tanti altri utilizzatori e anche videomaker di fama mondiale)sono molto deluso dal comportamento di Sony. Inserire funzioni evolute su macchine dal costo decisamente inferiore alle ammiraglie e lasciar fuori le stesse ammiraglie che avrebbero diritto a queste feature è un comportamento che ha fatto arrabbiare più di qualcuno...di sicuro prima di spendere ancora tutti questi soldi in un ammiraglia che dopo pochi mesi vedo superata da una fotocamera minore ,ci penserò mille volte.
Great points.
yaaaaaaa no 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A7RIIIA
I think the bigger question is why would you buy the a1 when the a7RV is priced much better? The a7iv is the right choice for most people, amateur or professional
If you shoot sports where AF speed and frames per second matter. I have the A1. Though I primarily shoot landscape I also shoot sports (soccer, football, hockey) and capturing "the moment" in action benefits from the 20fps that I get. If they had made the r5 such that I could use the electronic shutter w/o the rolling shutter issue and get at least 10fps then I might have sold my A1 and picked up the R5. I love the new screen and the focus bracketing (for landscape). But for now I think I will wait and see if all these cool upgrades come out in the A1M2.
Wife’s sister got me 😂
61mp, please folks stop saying 60mp. Every mp is important.
🤣 DPReview lists it as 60mp effective, sony 61mp. The resolution numbers 9504x6336 = 60,217,344.
@@CharlieVN From Sony : Number of Pixels (Effective)
Approx. 61.0 megapixels, Number of Pixels (total)
Approx. 62.5 megapixels I believe Sony, not DPReview. Sony made the camera. Please get it right, Thanks
33mp is a positive for the a7iv.
Not many people want 61mp.
I have the a7iv and ordered the a7rv because I want 4k/60 no crop but also a good photo camera
a7rv has crop in 4k 60p i think :-??
@@BoshkaGaming yes, but I really meant I want both. The a7siii isn’t a good photo camera, and the a7iv is 1.5x crop. That’s the best camera that’s in the middle of both at the moment
How does the 7rv work out for you?
wait for a7v
AF point more on a74
This review was so funny i couldnt pay attention
First
Neither just buy the a7riv
For your sake I hope your wife doesn’t have a sister 😦
They dont both have the same chip (X vs XR), fact check me. stopped watching at that point, do your research
Do you shoot Canon too?
sorry, no