I’m a 32 year old Brit - left in 2021 for Brazil, I just can’t believe what I’m seeing from back home, granted I left because I just felt the country declining, but I never in my wildest dreams imagined it would accelerate like it has. I honestly want to get my parents out of there.
Very quick upload, thank you, and ignore the comments last time about uploading late. I appreciate what you're doing here and you're doing amazing work by even bringing this to us so consistently.
We will run a more efficient, healthier economy where we can remove the artificial peg of renewable energy against the most expensive forms of energy and actually massively reduce what people pay individually.
More jam tomorrow BS. Energy costs are ever rising as grid upgrades and storage need to be paid for, just to cope with all the new intermittent renewables@@Beardyweirdyuk
I'd rather her making sure that they quickly answer the questions than that they keep dodging it and wasting the hour. She's a journalist. That's what she's supposed to do. If you don't like her approach, just go back and watch DD's episodes but quit nagging.
@AH-te5gs she butt's in before they even have a chance to answer though and then the question gets diverted. If they weren't answering, then I would agree with you, but she has a terrible habit of not letting the panelists make their point before asking a follow up question.
A ban on social media for under 16s would not deny the means for parents to allow supervised access to social media. This simply offers a more controlled and healthy way of protecting the mental health of young people.
The studio looked nice and warm. Im wearing three layers right now and debating how many fishfingers to put in a sandwhich since 10 cost me £4. Is the studio heated with a heat pump?
Wrong, wrong and wrong. Do you know anyone with a hear pump? I know 3 and they are all quiet, cheap to run and will pay for themselves in a few years compared to paying high gas prices.
My family used technology to end our direct dependence on fossil fuels. Electrified transport works. High speed trains are excellent. E-bikes, car-clubs, etc. all convenient. Heat pumps are awesome. The technologies are there and most people would only experience lifestyle improvements. The only technology which got worse (in my perspective) is that I still prefer gas hobs to induction hobs. Others might disagree. There is too much cynicism and pessimism around. We are literally discussing that lives will get better for most people with lower running costs. At the same time we will buy British made energy instead of funding dictators which hurts our security.
@@DS246416 The energy is mostly made in the UK. To the extent the investors are foreign owned they are mostly Norwegian, Danish, etc. Countries who don't fund the bombing of Europe. What's more is that they mostly pay a substantial proportion to the Crown Estate (essentially the treasury) with low profits compared to what the Saudis, Qataris, Russians get. You might find it hard to accept but your lifestyle means the Iranians, Russians, Saudis, etc are richer. This money has often ended up in the hands of terrorists or create dissent at home. Most of the radical Islamic mosques in the UK are funded by the Saudis and others. This is what you fund ultimately. We have the good news that we can pivot away from this. Most of the expenditure from my lifestyle benefits French, British, Danish, Norwegian, etc. energy producers. However much you dislike the EU these people have never caused terrorism on our shores due to energy profits.
The main problem is on energy price being set to a gas price for renewables suppliers (that's why Dale Vince is a multi-millionaire). That system is out of date and there needs to a clear policy to reprice (rather than wait another 5 years for gas prices to fall) or to windfall tax renewables providers. On the positive side this issue is finally being talked about, on the negative side this system is run by the government; it should have been addressed 2 years ago and the budget made no steps to address it. Labour being way too cautious.
9:45 Money doesn’t come from The Government. Any money the government has is from what taxes it collects, from you and me! Alternatively from QE / Monetised Debt which leads to rising CPI …. Which is a dishonest tax on you and me. All governments are good at is spending our money badly on stuff we didnt ask for.
90% of China will starve to death if west cuts trade ties, most of their peasant population relies of factory work. India... nah they aint got power outside their borders, US relies on UK for many things from technology, intelligence and war ally, as Britain is one of the few countries around the world able to project military power and invade.
This is where the focus is in the wrong place, can you uk play a major role in limiting emissions worldwide? No not directly, but innovatively yes absolutely. You have to think, why are countries using fossil fuels? Because for them it is the cheapest and most efficient way of generating electricity. Now if we as a country take a leading role in both driving down those costs, creating new technologies and showing as a model a country can both function and thrive then of course it would have a major impact on other countries following suite.
Question time in a nutshell = Someone on right speaks sense, no one claps or they boo, then some woke mental leftist talks a bunch of hysteria nonsense, everyone claps and cheers.
@@shoomus3504 every show... just look at this audience crying over who Donald trump is appointing or elon musk, the woke left just payed every Hollywood celeb to endorse them... are you thik asf or what? Labour has made everyone worse off and attacked taxes and the left and wilfully ignorant to it... you C.
We've just had more than two weeks with no wind and no sun. What's the big plan for when that repeats in January or February, and it's ten degrees colder?
There is no plan. You have to have back up energy generation but they are turning off coal and stopping North Sea drilling so the UK won't have that. There is actually too little CO2 in the atmosphere - there is NO evidence CO2 is affecting the climate. The Global South is ignoring this Climate Change rubbish. Argentina walked out of COP29. Trump doesn't accept the narrative and he is right. 'Clean energy' is not cheaper - it is massively subsidised. Everything they say is stupidity or a lie.
Thank you for uploading so fast. I look forward to watching this every week. I'm an expat who left the UK almost 15 years ago but still follow politics there. I totally agree with Australia's path of wanting to ban social media for under 16s. I think mental health drastically improves once you disconnect from online reality and re-engage in the real world which includes nature. I've detoxed from social media and am on my last account which I'm only using now to access marketplace. I hope other countries copy suit. Where I live in BC, they have already banned the use of mobile phones across schools as of this year. I think reducing social media will definitely help reduce the rate of ADHD which we're seeing more and more of in children and youth.
What do you mean unnoticed? The entrepreneur responded to that question directly. You can buy in wind energy when it is not windy and you can use old EV batteries to store electricity too.
@@pemberton6974 its not a lie. It correctly points out the lack of battery capacity and base load energy within the energy grid to match the UK economy. The lack of base load energy needs to be increased with increased battery capacity or increasing base load energy like nuclear, coal, hydro, natural gas, etc; which the UK lacks in its energy mix. Connecting an all/majority wind energy source to the grid isn't currently feasible and provides significant risk to outages which leads to higher costs for the UK consumers.
@@AH-te5gs Not my cactus, he's really quite intuitive. Stanley on the other hand... Well let's just say I hope his parents didn't waste too much money on his education.
i wouldnt feel so lifeending y choice if i wasnt constantly battling poverty , smart phones are not why i feel like taking my own life ,its because im sick of having to work hard and struggle whilst the idle rich get everything handed to them on a plate
i thought the comment by Mr Jackson about how the Chinese developing green technology might or might not be bc they r "nice people" was quite significant, in that surely, as world traders and as humans, as well as the need for the products, the point of trading is to recognise our common humanity, as well as to continue to foster good relations, with considerable respect? Mr Reynolds talks about defence in the context of trade ... to repeat myself, is this not slightly distorting one of the initial reasons for the latter, that is, to promote positive associations, with respect???
Scientists have already come together on this. Politicians are just not willing to act on it, demonstrated very well by Reynolds' response to the question about dairy farming.
They love the ‘innovate’ word. It’s meaningless but they can’t be tied down on anything if they use it. No need to answer the question. Off the hook. Back into the limo and a comfy ride home.
Watch this if you want a one sided conversation and narrow minded propaganda pushing government talking heads. No wonder ppl by the millions are watching podcasts with knowledgeable different opinions people. This has to be a joke.who can stand this?
Insentivise communities to have windfarms close, by giving them energy reductions. The fossil fuel profiteers should not get their hands on green energy, keep green energy owned by us the people. No shareholders. Keep our energy costs as low as possible, and reduce carbon emissions.
Why don't you all stop meddling and let mother nature do its thing. Look at the EU meddling in dams and rivers and the outcome for the Spanish. Every action leave a trace. Every bit of meddling has consequences
Tim was spot on. Our country is punishing its citizens with draconian measures while we only contribute to 1% of global emissions. China and India who are the biggest polluters are practically ignoring the issue. The nonsense talked about wind power etc is grotesque. This problem is horrendous but the world is not addressing it. Still the UK spends billions on fiddling things that are detrimental to ordinary people. Electric cars are just another problem that’s not being addressed. The batteries have a limited life and cost a fortune to replace. And heat pumps are a total laugh. They cost a fortune to install and are far from effective. The government is on a moral crusade at the expense of working people.
This is where the focus is in the wrong place, can the UK play a major role in limiting emissions worldwide? No not directly, but innovatively yes absolutely. You have to think, why are countries like China and India using fossil fuels? Because for them it is the cheapest and most efficient way of generating electricity especially in a growing economy. Now if we as a country take a leading role in driving down those costs, creating new technologies and showing the UK as a model of a country that can both function and thrive while running a net zero economy then of course it would have a major impact on other countries following suite. It's a great point to look at how much renewable energy was to create 10-15 years ago compared to now it is insanely stark, and the same will happen with further investment and innovation for electric and hybrid cars and heat pumps. The alternative is unthinkable and if we have the opportunity to change course then absolutely we should do so.
I appreciate your very relevant heart-felt points and understand the gravity of the situation. My problem is a deeply rooted cynicism about our government’s ability to both understand the issues and to invest properly in solutions that are not simply driven by ill-informed groups such as the Just Stop Oil and climate change extremists or self-seeking industries attempting to make a fast buck on the back of the climate crisis. The whole nonsense about smart meters is just one example. Billions of public money has been invested in this flawed and suspect technology. 8 million or so metres are already faulty and the whole scheme is really about introducing dynamic pricing to maximise the profits of power companies owned by other countries who charge UK residents more than their own nationals. If our politicians were better informed and showed true leadership I could go along with what changes are necessary but the impact of their ill-thought-out plans will result in measures that may cause much suffering for ordinary people and have no real impact on the true problem. Britain’s days of morally “leading the world” are surely over. Yes, support our scientists to develop innovative ways to help decrease the impact of climate change but don’t ruin our economy, and the standard of life for ordinary people, by expensive and useless measures that simply tick boxes. Virtue signalling solves nothing. I have worked in the sustainable development sector for many years and see the nonsense first hand. We will never become a net zero economy but will soon become a third world economy unless our political leadership gets real.
given mr musk's apparent concern for CO2 build-up, i wonder how he justifies the launching of the rockets, emitting a lot of this gas into the atmosphere, although, i think having mars as a back ups potentially sensible???
His answer is, 99% oh his rockets distribute satellites, all other rockets distribute 1 satellite, his system literally delivers 40 or 50 then Instead of leaving the rocket in space it returns and is reusable. So on space terms he is saving huge emissions. Privately his mission to mars is a cost. But if you look at the massive impact he has made in cars and reusable rockets plus multiple satellites per rocket. Mars is a drop of water Vs a ocean he saved
I 8 the use of lazy abbreviations. Imo it makes me lmao, bc it's not that hard to type an actual word lol. It need to stop sooner rather than l8er. Iykwim
@kylejohnson She did try to understand the import of his comment which he was not able to clarify even after she gave him the opportunity to do so. There's only so much time in the programme. He said: a)Trump and Musk were previously Democrats. b) Are they planning to run the US like a business? How was Fiona Bruce to find a connection between a and b? Were Musk and Trump actually ever really Democrats? Didn't Trump donate to both major parties? We're either party members at some time? (I don't know the answers, just posing the questions) Are Democrats known to be more business-minded than Republicans? Is it appropriate to run a government in the same way as a business? Is everything about turning a profit? What do you the questioner feel about Trump and Musk as a combo? One could have asked these questions based on the young man's comments. But it would have been time-consuming and frankly a bit fruitless.
Worker's having rights an being able to pay there bills in stead of going food banks. that's so unfair 😂😂😂😂😂 bang out of Oder! An look one hundred billion lost cos of Brexit! So there is a Brexit tax as well! Dummys!
The host being as biased as ever , not challenging pie in the sky statements by Jonathan then falsely trying to correct actual facts from the more conservative panel member she and the BBC are a disgrace
What were the "pie in the sky statements"? And what did she correct that was factually correct on the conservative side? I'm no fan of Fiona but I didn't see her doing anything wrong in that regard.
i wish Damien cd have helped me more with my quest to ask the OU to extend my fee xtension more, with respect! i may have to approach the royals if there is no 'movement' with this, unfortunately?
I find this obsession with tackling climate change by reducing greenhouse gases in a country which produces 1% of all greenhouse gases at home but imports huge amounts of goods from countries like China thus increasing their greenhouse gases instead utterly ludicrous. Anyone with the tiniest grasp of simple arithmetic knows that is a laughable objective.
Fiona spends far too much time chatting to individual audience members. The audience both in person and via TV are tuning in to hear from the panel, not from other audience members.
praps tim needs to remember, with respect, that GB was the first to industrialise, so y not be the first to go green??? while i take on board his considerations bout costs to the GB populace, is this not an emergency? also, it seems that the new technology is reducing in price?????????????
Folks have to realise the more tax we pay and monies given to the government that the world cools down . Give more money to cool down 😂😂😂😂😂😂 the energy companies have just made 3.4 billion profits so think how much cooler the earth is this winter when the pensioners are freezing to death 😂😂
I am worried about the wholescale embracing of e-vehicles. Toxic stuff in batteries and the mining involved is one thing. Where do people think the leccy comes from? All from renewables? To me, it may be better, but not a complete solution. Hydrogen or other forms of carbon neutral gas propulsion would be better. And prioritisation of mobility over speed.
There talking about the dairy industry having an affect on climate change.. and he says he doesn’t listen to that isn’t it strange what there doing to farmers
My god, this show!!! 😒 This show is a perfect example of why the American people overwhelming voted for Trump. Normal people have had enough of this lefty nonsense. This country is so lost, heading down a very dark road.
to me its ironic that we need to reduce meat 'n' dairy bc it's possible that the latter were the first to be farmed, and, again i'm guessing, i think that before these animals were farmed, we used to worship them, or, at least, honour them after we 'dispatched' them???
That first "guest" was all for locking the country down, he was on good morning britain defendeing the indefensible during covid whilst his ubermasters were eating cheese and drinking wine. Sick of you lot.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
I’m a 32 year old Brit - left in 2021 for Brazil, I just can’t believe what I’m seeing from back home, granted I left because I just felt the country declining, but I never in my wildest dreams imagined it would accelerate like it has. I honestly want to get my parents out of there.
Traitor
Coward
Turncoat
You ran away.
@@Dewsta26Traitor to what? A German Royal Family and a country sold off by Thatcher. There isn’t anything left that is British.
Very quick upload, thank you, and ignore the comments last time about uploading late. I appreciate what you're doing here and you're doing amazing work by even bringing this to us so consistently.
I second this
³
We can hit net zero in this country at a stupidly expensive cost and globally it won't make any difference.
We will run a more efficient, healthier economy where we can remove the artificial peg of renewable energy against the most expensive forms of energy and actually massively reduce what people pay individually.
@@Beardyweirdyuk What does that mean? Are you saying you agree with net zero or not?
More jam tomorrow BS.
Energy costs are ever rising as grid upgrades and storage need to be paid for, just to cope with all the new intermittent renewables@@Beardyweirdyuk
Renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels. Oil runs out in 47 years, gas runs out in 52 years. Where's *your* plan???
Net zero is a fiction. It would utterly destroy our economy.
Fiona bruce butting in every question.
Yep... Too much delivery boy, not enough pizza.
I'd rather her making sure that they quickly answer the questions than that they keep dodging it and wasting the hour. She's a journalist. That's what she's supposed to do. If you don't like her approach, just go back and watch DD's episodes but quit nagging.
@AH-te5gs she butt's in before they even have a chance to answer though and then the question gets diverted. If they weren't answering, then I would agree with you, but she has a terrible habit of not letting the panelists make their point before asking a follow up question.
Exactly!!! Twenty seconds in and she's already interrupting. Always loved Question Time but I really miss David Dimbleby
Like Maitlis, she thinks it's all about her.
Question time is pure propaganda
A ban on social media for under 16s would not deny the means for parents to allow supervised access to social media. This simply offers a more controlled and healthy way of protecting the mental health of young people.
Thank you!! Greatly appreciated, as always!!
This is unbelievable. The bias isn’t even hidden.
The studio looked nice and warm. Im wearing three layers right now and debating how many fishfingers to put in a sandwhich since 10 cost me £4. Is the studio heated with a heat pump?
Heat pumps are shockingly bad and terribly inefficient and cost a fortune
Wrong, wrong and wrong. Do you know anyone with a hear pump? I know 3 and they are all quiet, cheap to run and will pay for themselves in a few years compared to paying high gas prices.
Have you got 1 or do your friends come round your house for a warm
@@cpcnw Hey we are only engineers what do we know.
"Okay so there's one mad media mogul who's right-wing... " - who is it? Musk? Viscount Rothermere? The Barclay Brother? Murdoch? Robbie Gibb?
My family used technology to end our direct dependence on fossil fuels. Electrified transport works. High speed trains are excellent. E-bikes, car-clubs, etc. all convenient. Heat pumps are awesome. The technologies are there and most people would only experience lifestyle improvements.
The only technology which got worse (in my perspective) is that I still prefer gas hobs to induction hobs. Others might disagree.
There is too much cynicism and pessimism around. We are literally discussing that lives will get better for most people with lower running costs. At the same time we will buy British made energy instead of funding dictators which hurts our security.
most electricity companies/suppliers are foreign owned, how is this buying british?
@@DS246416 The energy is mostly made in the UK. To the extent the investors are foreign owned they are mostly Norwegian, Danish, etc. Countries who don't fund the bombing of Europe. What's more is that they mostly pay a substantial proportion to the Crown Estate (essentially the treasury) with low profits compared to what the Saudis, Qataris, Russians get.
You might find it hard to accept but your lifestyle means the Iranians, Russians, Saudis, etc are richer. This money has often ended up in the hands of terrorists or create dissent at home. Most of the radical Islamic mosques in the UK are funded by the Saudis and others. This is what you fund ultimately.
We have the good news that we can pivot away from this. Most of the expenditure from my lifestyle benefits French, British, Danish, Norwegian, etc. energy producers. However much you dislike the EU these people have never caused terrorism on our shores due to energy profits.
The main problem is on energy price being set to a gas price for renewables suppliers (that's why Dale Vince is a multi-millionaire). That system is out of date and there needs to a clear policy to reprice (rather than wait another 5 years for gas prices to fall) or to windfall tax renewables providers.
On the positive side this issue is finally being talked about, on the negative side this system is run by the government; it should have been addressed 2 years ago and the budget made no steps to address it. Labour being way too cautious.
Exactly we just transfer our emissions to another country so we haven't stopped them we have just changed the geographic
9:45 Money doesn’t come from The Government. Any money the government has is from what taxes it collects, from you and me!
Alternatively from QE / Monetised Debt which leads to rising CPI …. Which is a dishonest tax on you and me.
All governments are good at is spending our money badly on stuff we didnt ask for.
The UK has a major role to play? China, India, The US does not care what KS says or thinks. We do not have a major role at all.
90% of China will starve to death if west cuts trade ties, most of their peasant population relies of factory work. India... nah they aint got power outside their borders, US relies on UK for many things from technology, intelligence and war ally, as Britain is one of the few countries around the world able to project military power and invade.
This is where the focus is in the wrong place, can you uk play a major role in limiting emissions worldwide? No not directly, but innovatively yes absolutely. You have to think, why are countries using fossil fuels? Because for them it is the cheapest and most efficient way of generating electricity. Now if we as a country take a leading role in both driving down those costs, creating new technologies and showing as a model a country can both function and thrive then of course it would have a major impact on other countries following suite.
The term 'fossil' fuel was made up to make oil (a mineral) sound more precious
Just watching it now from Down Under 🏴🇦🇺
Question time in a nutshell = Someone on right speaks sense, no one claps or they boo, then some woke mental leftist talks a bunch of hysteria nonsense, everyone claps and cheers.
Please give me examples I beg
@@shoomus3504 every show... just look at this audience crying over who Donald trump is appointing or elon musk, the woke left just payed every Hollywood celeb to endorse them... are you thik asf or what? Labour has made everyone worse off and attacked taxes and the left and wilfully ignorant to it... you C.
@@shoomus3504 oh you're Russian no wonder you know **** all and believe lies.
@@shoomus3504 you know that ain't gonna happen...lol..
@@shoomus3504 he s right watch and listen
Thanks for the very prompt upload
We've just had more than two weeks with no wind and no sun.
What's the big plan for when that repeats in January or February, and it's ten degrees colder?
There is no plan. You have to have back up energy generation but they are turning off coal and stopping North Sea drilling so the UK won't have that. There is actually too little CO2 in the atmosphere - there is NO evidence CO2 is affecting the climate. The Global South is ignoring this Climate Change rubbish. Argentina walked out of COP29. Trump doesn't accept the narrative and he is right.
'Clean energy' is not cheaper - it is massively subsidised. Everything they say is stupidity or a lie.
Got plenty of wind and rain around me. Good thing they built the farms around me and not you.
Why not look at how France does it. They have been investing in energy resources for years. Unfortunately, the uk is very late to the party.
Yes I appreciate this so much as a Brit living in Singapore.
Thank you for uploading so fast. I look forward to watching this every week. I'm an expat who left the UK almost 15 years ago but still follow politics there.
I totally agree with Australia's path of wanting to ban social media for under 16s. I think mental health drastically improves once you disconnect from online reality and re-engage in the real world which includes nature. I've detoxed from social media and am on my last account which I'm only using now to access marketplace. I hope other countries copy suit. Where I live in BC, they have already banned the use of mobile phones across schools as of this year. I think reducing social media will definitely help reduce the rate of ADHD which we're seeing more and more of in children and youth.
When did Australia become a commie hellscape. COVID really fucked with you people
Tim Stanley said, in this country the wind dies and the sun doesn't shine. That went unnoticed. This clown 🤡 is not an expert on the issue.
What do you mean unnoticed? The entrepreneur responded to that question directly. You can buy in wind energy when it is not windy and you can use old EV batteries to store electricity too.
Exactly. BBC is poisoning citizens by platforming right wing freaks like Tim Stanley everyweek
He's not wrong and he's expressing an issue in layman's terms. Not enough baseload is hampering the UK Energy sector and its economy.
@N9mber is "the wind dies, and the sun doesn't shine," a layman's term? Isn't that disrespectful to the layman?
What he said was a lie.
@@pemberton6974 its not a lie. It correctly points out the lack of battery capacity and base load energy within the energy grid to match the UK economy. The lack of base load energy needs to be increased with increased battery capacity or increasing base load energy like nuclear, coal, hydro, natural gas, etc; which the UK lacks in its energy mix.
Connecting an all/majority wind energy source to the grid isn't currently feasible and provides significant risk to outages which leads to higher costs for the UK consumers.
Power from wind and solar is cheaper? We live on an Island where it's mostly cloudy and the wind doesn't blow constantly.
I suggest you do some research on the subject before exposing your arrogant ignorance infront of everyone mate
Being in charge of a platoon is poles apart from being in charge of the US military, Tim.
Thanks for the upload.
Heat pumps are rubbish for a house.Donot be taken in.
I’ll be canceling my Octopus energy agreement as that guy is an absolute narcissist.
I thought he was great. I can't wait to get back to UK and sign up with Octopus 😊
100% of scientists agree with whoever is paying them
Thanks - good show overall. Turned from entrenched positions to trying to address problems
We need a integrated transport system bus and trains, people have no option but drive cars, and pollute environment.
Thanks for the upload 😀 Have a nice weekend.
Don't watch it with FB interruption . It should be called the FB show. I used to love that program.
Send the lady in purple to the front line
THANKS FOR POSTING
Thank you for this (and other) uploads.
I've got a cactus that's smarter than Tim Stanley. 🤣😂
Maybe but they have one thing in common, they're both little ... s. (someone had to say it🤷)
Smart people can be terribly wrong and misguided sometimes.
@@AH-te5gsYes, think of Eugenics!
@@AH-te5gs Not my cactus, he's really quite intuitive. Stanley on the other hand... Well let's just say I hope his parents didn't waste too much money on his education.
You have to have the brain of a cactus to grow Cactus
i wouldnt feel so lifeending y choice if i wasnt constantly battling poverty , smart phones are not why i feel like taking my own life ,its because im sick of having to work hard and struggle whilst the idle rich get everything handed to them on a plate
And illegal migrants
Thank you.
did tim stanley just tried to argue with greg jackson? is he fer real!?!
Thank you very much PoliticalTV.
Thanks for the quick upload bud 👍
i thought the comment by Mr Jackson about how the Chinese developing green technology might or might not be bc they r "nice people" was quite significant, in that surely, as world traders and as humans, as well as the need for the products, the point of trading is to recognise our common humanity, as well as to continue to foster good relations, with considerable respect? Mr Reynolds talks about defence in the context of trade ... to repeat myself, is this not slightly distorting one of the initial reasons for the latter, that is, to promote positive associations, with respect???
I had a ground source heat pump and it was rubbish. tepid water and a freezing house
Can be run by solar powers now, so much better now depending on the source I suppose.
Scientists have already come together on this. Politicians are just not willing to act on it, demonstrated very well by Reynolds' response to the question about dairy farming.
They love the ‘innovate’ word. It’s meaningless but they can’t be tied down on anything if they use it. No need to answer the question. Off the hook. Back into the limo and a comfy ride home.
Watch this if you want a one sided conversation and narrow minded propaganda pushing government talking heads. No wonder ppl by the millions are watching podcasts with knowledgeable different opinions people. This has to be a joke.who can stand this?
You mean its not right-wing enough for you.
Insentivise communities to have windfarms close, by giving them energy reductions. The fossil fuel profiteers should not get their hands on green energy, keep green energy owned by us the people. No shareholders. Keep our energy costs as low as possible, and reduce carbon emissions.
Now I understand why Starmer is obliterating our farming industry and families. It's to do with his net zero target. Didn't join the two until now.
Why don't you all stop meddling and let mother nature do its thing. Look at the EU meddling in dams and rivers and the outcome for the Spanish. Every action leave a trace. Every bit of meddling has consequences
Yes but that green woman tried to say Valencia was climate change. They're all lying gaslighting grifting frauds.😡
Tim was spot on. Our country is punishing its citizens with draconian measures while we only contribute to 1% of global emissions. China and India who are the biggest polluters are practically ignoring the issue. The nonsense talked about wind power etc is grotesque. This problem is horrendous but the world is not addressing it. Still the UK spends billions on fiddling things that are detrimental to ordinary people. Electric cars are just another problem that’s not being addressed. The batteries have a limited life and cost a fortune to replace. And heat pumps are a total laugh. They cost a fortune to install and are far from effective. The government is on a moral crusade at the expense of working people.
Tim? Is that you?? 😂
No. I’m not Tim but someone who understands his position.
This is where the focus is in the wrong place, can the UK play a major role in limiting emissions worldwide? No not directly, but innovatively yes absolutely. You have to think, why are countries like China and India using fossil fuels? Because for them it is the cheapest and most efficient way of generating electricity especially in a growing economy. Now if we as a country take a leading role in driving down those costs, creating new technologies and showing the UK as a model of a country that can both function and thrive while running a net zero economy then of course it would have a major impact on other countries following suite.
It's a great point to look at how much renewable energy was to create 10-15 years ago compared to now it is insanely stark, and the same will happen with further investment and innovation for electric and hybrid cars and heat pumps.
The alternative is unthinkable and if we have the opportunity to change course then absolutely we should do so.
I appreciate your very relevant heart-felt points and understand the gravity of the situation. My problem is a deeply rooted cynicism about our government’s ability to both understand the issues and to invest properly in solutions that are not simply driven by ill-informed groups such as the Just Stop Oil and climate change extremists or self-seeking industries attempting to make a fast buck on the back of the climate crisis. The whole nonsense about smart meters is just one example. Billions of public money has been invested in this flawed and suspect technology. 8 million or so metres are already faulty and the whole scheme is really about introducing dynamic pricing to maximise the profits of power companies owned by other countries who charge UK residents more than their own nationals. If our politicians were better informed and showed true leadership I could go along with what changes are necessary but the impact of their ill-thought-out plans will result in measures that may cause much suffering for ordinary people and have no real impact on the true problem. Britain’s days of morally “leading the world” are surely over. Yes, support our scientists to develop innovative ways to help decrease the impact of climate change but don’t ruin our economy, and the standard of life for ordinary people, by expensive and useless measures that simply tick boxes. Virtue signalling solves nothing. I have worked in the sustainable development sector for many years and see the nonsense first hand. We will never become a net zero economy but will soon become a third world economy unless our political leadership gets real.
given mr musk's apparent concern for CO2 build-up, i wonder how he justifies the launching of the rockets, emitting a lot of this gas into the atmosphere, although, i think having mars as a back ups potentially sensible???
His answer is, 99% oh his rockets distribute satellites, all other rockets distribute 1 satellite, his system literally delivers 40 or 50 then Instead of leaving the rocket in space it returns and is reusable. So on space terms he is saving huge emissions. Privately his mission to mars is a cost. But if you look at the massive impact he has made in cars and reusable rockets plus multiple satellites per rocket. Mars is a drop of water Vs a ocean he saved
@@JamesHambrook thank you!
Bla bla bla bla...open your eyes and you will see.
imho, television b4 the internet was worse 4 us, with respect???
I 8 the use of lazy abbreviations. Imo it makes me lmao, bc it's not that hard to type an actual word lol. It need to stop sooner rather than l8er. Iykwim
24:20 Fiona didn’t have to do poor kid like like that 😂
@kylejohnson
She did try to understand the import of his comment which he was not able to clarify even after she gave him the opportunity to do so. There's only so much time in the programme.
He said:
a)Trump and Musk were previously Democrats.
b) Are they planning to run the US like a business?
How was Fiona Bruce to find a connection between a and b?
Were Musk and Trump actually ever really Democrats? Didn't Trump donate to both major parties? We're either party members at some time? (I don't know the answers, just posing the questions)
Are Democrats known to be more business-minded than Republicans?
Is it appropriate to run a government in the same way as a business? Is everything about turning a profit?
What do you the questioner feel about Trump and Musk as a combo?
One could have asked these questions based on the young man's comments. But it would have been time-consuming and frankly a bit fruitless.
Worker's having rights an being able to pay there bills in stead of going food banks. that's so unfair 😂😂😂😂😂 bang out of Oder! An look one hundred billion lost cos of Brexit! So there is a Brexit tax as well! Dummys!
The host being as biased as ever , not challenging pie in the sky statements by Jonathan then falsely trying to correct actual facts from the more conservative panel member she and the BBC are a disgrace
What were the "pie in the sky statements"? And what did she correct that was factually correct on the conservative side? I'm no fan of Fiona but I didn't see her doing anything wrong in that regard.
i wish Damien cd have helped me more with my quest to ask the OU to extend my fee xtension more, with respect! i may have to approach the royals if there is no 'movement' with this, unfortunately?
Greg Jackson gets loads of government subsedies. Without those subsedies I suspect Octopus would go the same way as all the other companies.
there is a toxin in the air, Tim, with respect, from exhaust fumes which might damage ppls' mental health, possibly???
Fiona Bruce as balanced as ever 😂
Scotland..... Scotland is one of the windiest, most resourceful places INDEPENDENCE RFN 🏴
SO IS YOUR WINDMILLS
I find this obsession with tackling climate change by reducing greenhouse gases in a country which produces 1% of all greenhouse gases at home but imports huge amounts of goods from countries like China thus increasing their greenhouse gases instead utterly ludicrous. Anyone with the tiniest grasp of simple arithmetic knows that is a laughable objective.
GO TEAM
So even with wind we'll be buying power from other people????
Fiona spends far too much time chatting to individual audience members. The audience both in person and via TV are tuning in to hear from the panel, not from other audience members.
I use to be a regular viewer of QT. I can’t stand watching it these days. I watched the first 10 mins of this video and decided to switch off.
praps tim needs to remember, with respect, that GB was the first to industrialise, so y not be the first to go green??? while i take on board his considerations bout costs to the GB populace, is this not an emergency? also, it seems that the new technology is reducing in price?????????????
Tim Stanley LISTEN to the experts!!!
The chairs of this programme should shut up and let questions flow. The programme is spoilt every week
It's about controle and utter nonsense
Folks have to realise the more tax we pay and monies given to the government that the world cools down . Give more money to cool down 😂😂😂😂😂😂 the energy companies have just made 3.4 billion profits so think how much cooler the earth is this winter when the pensioners are freezing to death 😂😂
I am worried about the wholescale embracing of e-vehicles. Toxic stuff in batteries and the mining involved is one thing. Where do people think the leccy comes from? All from renewables? To me, it may be better, but not a complete solution. Hydrogen or other forms of carbon neutral gas propulsion would be better. And prioritisation of mobility over speed.
Tim Stanley is a complete, total, and absolute fool. That guy has *no* idea what he's talking about, on any topic discussed on this panel.
No idea why they keep bringing him back all the time
@@rooks4ever Fiona Onasanya is busy days.
There talking about the dairy industry having an affect on climate change.. and he says he doesn’t listen to that isn’t it strange what there doing to farmers
either Labour's for or against the market economy, no, with respect???
Cannot stand Reynolds - I simply cannot watch him, his hypocrisy and lies.
My god, this show!!! 😒 This show is a perfect example of why the American people overwhelming voted for Trump. Normal people have had enough of this lefty nonsense. This country is so lost, heading down a very dark road.
Amen
Load of rubbish - just be honest if you don't understand what is being said
@@rafl-hx8kw 🤣😆🤣😆🤣😆🤣😆🤣
BBC, planting commentators in the audience since?
Is the BBC still going? I thought it had been shut down.
to me its ironic that we need to reduce meat 'n' dairy bc it's possible that the latter were the first to be farmed, and, again i'm guessing, i think that before these animals were farmed, we used to worship them, or, at least, honour them after we 'dispatched' them???
"conditions 4 success in the long-term" ... ???
Dearest Mr Hinds, with the greatest respect, pl eff off ...
Jonathan Reynolds trying to justify the unjustifiable 😂. Oh wait a 22bn black hole
am i hearing right ... is Ellie saying that bloodshed should continue, with respect???
Tim Stanley? Wot a bloody dope.
If you tell a lie often enough it doesnt become the truth you know.
Ban Under 16s From Social Media.....
😅😅😂😂😂😄😄...🙄🙄🙄
Nobody from Reform on the panel funny that !!!!!
Yeah we need a laugh
nuclear makes us 2 vulnerable, surely, with respect???
I'm sorry to say I gave up watching question time just BBC propaganda
25:00 countries are not businesses!
Trump has picked a series of amazing people to run the country, and none are from Washington
Surely eating more natural foods and less factory produced good makes more sense
STOP SPRAYING HEAVY METALS INTO THE ATMOSPHERE
The grinning head bobbing bloke on the end pushing his business at every question... boring 😴
Stopped the bbc licence 6 years ago don't miss watching it at all !
That first "guest" was all for locking the country down, he was on good morning britain defendeing the indefensible during covid whilst his ubermasters were eating cheese and drinking wine. Sick of you lot.
I stopped watching this labour propaganda program