We give Rockstar a lot of shit for stuff like not releasing GTA 6, not making a Bully sequel or for what GTA Online has become, and rightfully so, but we have to appreciate their work and what they have put out through the years. My life would be different without Rockstars' titles.
Too much content yeah but you realize how much content they have put out through the years I don’t know any other games that have added that much tbh I think we’re just spoiled when it comes to gta
@Henrik K You gotta remember everyone is making a Open world. Plus now they might have real competition with CDPR and Cyberpunk, so whatever they are doing they are gonna put their all. into it
Thanks for inviting me to collab! Rockstar's map design is such an interesting subject and they pack so much detail into them, I could practically spend hours talking about each one.
Minus the damn online bullshit! I get it, they make millions from minors playing this adult game, because these kids want fancy ingame cloth. But is such a shame that single player add ons died for this bullshit! GTA 4 had so nice additional stories, that made you discover it’s whole world from a different perspective and that drew me in even more! While story wise gta 5 is still my favorite (followed closely by San Andreas) it’s such a shame that there is no way to live in this world other than the main game. It’s so sad, that they choose money over content. They abandoned everything they stood for up to GTA 4, just because of money.. It’s a perfect example of capitalism gone wrong.
@@rolux4853 To be honest I’d rather they not put major resources towards expansions and let smaller teams like they do work on the online and have the head writers work on the next big project. In today’s age to make a very good expansion it would probably take 1-2 years compared to maybe 6-12 months like it did 10 years ago. The expectations has risen and the work to create the detail they’d want would be more.
In the main story yes. But when we head into the epilogue after 8 years there’s no improvement nothing drastically new to it, it felt like a cop out. It was heading towards to the end of the Wild West era like it said so I wanted to see more movements to that, maybe dead towns from the ms turned into a populated town.
Rdr2 is tied with skyrim for my all time favorite game. Not only is its map massive ( bigger than even gta5's) but it feels so full, every 8nch populated with wildlife, npcs, activities and missions, Easter eggs, no part is left empty.
Im curious, why? I have never had anything but love for them, their games are all classics. Even with minor misses, they are miles ahead of any other game
I think he’s been getting noticed more like 2 months ago when I started watching his channel he 20k subscribers and since then he’s gotten 34k subscribers
There's not much to do in the open world of LA Noire, but damn if it isn't the most accurate video game map ever made. I can't imagine the amount of research it took to painstakingly recreate 1947 downtown LA, building by building and street by street. I really hope to see a map like that in the future.
One of the details that always got me in GTA IV was when you had an incoming call and you happened to be in a car; You can hear a faint buzzing on the radio station moments before the call is connected. That blew me away as that is so unbelievably true to life.
I mean we theoretically could be We could just be inside a book and God is the author and assuming every character in a story people create is alive, then i feel bad for the people who live in the universe where their God just straight up destroy them 24/7
I think one big thing Rockstar needs is more interiors in GTA. Even if it’s just the podium/lobby areas for skyscrapers and then maybe one or two floors near the top, that’s still more than most of what they’ve got now. And what about that huge mall near the Ponsonby’s? That would’ve been great to have a lot of stores in. I also think more overall world interaction would be good; I miss that they took out the ability to go into a Burger Shot or the chicken place and actually sit down and eat, for example.
@@justanotherghost4589 Or actually be able to order at Burger Shot or Clucking Bell again. Go to the gym and actually get ripped. They had tennis, so why not be able to use the gym equipment on the beach?
4 had that with a lot of locations. Anywhere you could enter for missions was open, and there were even some extra places. V was lacking in so many areas tbh
biggest proof of this video is how memorable rockstars maps are. You could send me a photo of a random curb or store in gta, and I'd be able to tell you where it is on the map instantly.
But dude, why are we rockstar fans so selfish... Rhey are busy creating whats about to be the biggest game for decades just for us, so that we dont feel like we waste 60usd... These type of games only come out once every 10 years... Watch when gta 6 releases, everyone will jump back and suck rockstar's dick again just like how they did after rdr2 dropped .... Before rdr2 dropped, people were trashing on rockstar for online.... But when rdr2 released, all of a sudden, Rockstar is king... Now that rdr2 is aging(that game doesnt age though, ive never seen a game so ahead of its time) people are back at trashing rockstar... Then when gta 6 drops, its the same shit... And dont say it wont be the same because Of Dan and lezlie.... There is only 1 VIP in rockstar, if he leaves its the end of rockstar games, and thats Phil Hooker, Leading Director of Technology and programming in Rockstar Studios... Calm down Rockstar is working in something huge, thats why expanded and enhanced and the trilogy are ass
They didn't make it lol. They did fuck up though by tasking mobile phone game developers to do the job. It should of been done in house and all 3 classics should of got the mafia treatment but on the gta 5 engine.
I love how people just completely forget about RDR 2 as if it wasn't the last thing they've made. Grove Street Games handled the trilogy remasters. And yeah, that was a really dumb decision, but it's not a situation where Rockstar just completely forgot how to make good games. They chose poorly. Wait until GTA VI before you start assuming the worst. I know I sound like a fanboy (and I kinda am, I guess) but people shouldn't panic before we even have a glimpse of VI.
San Diego has huge potential for a GTA game. It's right on the border with Mexico (cartels, people smuggling?), has lots of military bases (secret weapons and stealth break-in missions?) and has a huge biomedical industry, which has a story potential too.
At this point we gotta accept R* is gonna take forever for GTA 6 and will continue to milk the shit out of GTA 5 Online so why not just focus on the positive and push Rockstar to make GTA 6 an absolute banger?
@@mog7501 they went overboard with RDR 2 times over which led to a reform. There's nothing you can push for gta 6, gta online is so broken everywhere, cuckstar needs to address the game breaking bugs
I know Southern San Andreas(GTA5 Map) better than my own hometown. I can navigate without a map or GPS. Rockstar did such a good job to make the world feel real. I may have been born in Massachusetts but I was raised in San Andreas.
This reminds me of the first time I went to New York and being absolutely blown away by how many things I were able to recognize after playing gta 4 as a kid. It made me kinda feel at home in a city I've never seen before.
@@MaxB00M man I wish I could go to New York and LA someday and experience familiarity due to hours of playing GTA 4 and 5. Unfortunately I'm in a third world asian country
“When you play a game from rockstar you can tell that they woeked hard to sell you, not a map, but a reality” A reality with flying motercycles with rockets
@mo gamer rockstar created some new vehicles that r possible to create in real life like how does the ufo's fly whit no motors? They r advanced civilization, we r not advanced as those people, so ya in movies they said it possible to have a flying car, and the oppressor it a small jet engine and small wings it possible to build those but we need to advance whit technology before building stuff like this
@mo gamer yeah, that was just a move on rockstar part who wants get more milk than the cow can give, i am tired of gta v. yeah it's a great game but i already finished the story game 5 times and the online. don't even talk about it. full of oppressor mk2s and 10 year old kids, killing you the moment you spawn on the map. yikes i don't even imagine getting around the map without being exploded
It's so sad how bad they messed that franchise up they could have just keep doing what they did in the second one ... Update map cars guns clothes and get a new story and it'd still be a great game with a graphics update
TLDR: they suggest a few things that range from “might be possible” to “sending game makers to the torture chambers”. Even only keeping suggestions to “might be possible” can lead to catastrophic failure while making such a game. Non game devs talking about what they’d want from a game. It’s hopeful but not possible. Add too many systems to a game which might clash then you’ll be dealing with more and more bugs. A massive landscape is totally possible to make within a game, even if it’ll take a stupid amount of time, but adding destruction to each building? That’s a piss take and a nightmare for artists, developers and technical artists. 300 players is also a stretch (and hell with destruction physics). Possible, but a stretch. It’d be easier on their servers to make it possible to seamlessly slide in and out of servers depending on what region of the map you were in, with a proximity chat, but that’s still a stretch.
Destruction to buildings is probably the dumbest thing anyone can ask rockstar to do. It’s cool but pointless when there’s already so much attention to detail in these games that already make you feel like you’re in a real world.
@@tunacanjerry8693 yea it makes no sense for gta, its works in bf because it's a sandbox shooter with matches and limited chaos that resets every game.
@@CuteSkyler I agree, the reverb is out. Audio is honestly my biggest weakness so I'm working harder at it for the next video. Addressing the over editing, idk man, that's just the point of the video - to be very edited.
If anything. The competition needs to step up. Rockstars making billions of a game that is close to 10 years old. You are telling me other big studios can't invest to create a good match? The maps not even the problem, Watchdogs 2 has a good map despite repeated assets. The problem is the game engine, driving and shooting in the other open world games is atrocious. And even if one turns good, the other doesn't. CoD Warfare is open world, obviously the shooting is better than GTA(not by a lot), but the driving is atrocious, worse than watchdogs(or cyberpunk). Rockstar is just too comfortable to make anything fresh. They are asleep at the throne.
Nah, it ruined exploration. In the other games I get to spend time exploring each area as the story progresses and I get familiar with it all, in V I couldn't tell you how to get anywhere from anywhere because I'd just drive all over the place between missions lmao
As someone who grew up in New York, everytime I play GTA 4 I get nostalgia. Everything from the Duplexes near the train tracks to the tolls you have to pass in order to get to NJ captures the exact feeling of what it’s like to be in NY.
What is underappreciated in terms of RDR2 map design is that they made a large state (New Austin) with loads of easter eggs, two towns and more, when you never go there in the story or in side quests. You're only able to go there starting the Epilogue. That's genuine commitment
Mafia 1 did this as well with the city of Lost Heaven having a countryside outside of the city map where you only really go for a number of missions to single locations but Instead they made a whole area 90% you will never go in the story.
Well its the map of rdr 1 so they didn't make it just for rdr2. But it's cool tjat they included it, i would love to see San Fierro or Las Venturas in GTA V
@@htmlrulezd00d99 i believe they tried but the current console of that gen would not be able to hold such a big map at the time so they expand the map using mountain and plain field instead.
They also believe it or not have Mexico from rdr1 in there too. It’s really well made but not rendered correctly and missing walls in some buildings but it’s still really impressive
Fun Fact: rockstar only put new austin because the RDR2 map was leaked and they wanted to include something to suprise people. Thats why new austin might seem rushed or empty. (imo they did everything they could because john cant really do anything there story wise other then bounty hunt and stranger missions could of been cool but at the same time it would just feel like rdr1 again)
I have my bunker and my 3 MC businesses in Grand Senora, but it is true that i don't visit Paleto Bay that much outside of setups and resupplies but it isn't that bad
@@e14ee that's what they should say, but they make references in Story Mode to Online. Like Lester saying there is one other person but they're too unpredictable, he's talking about your Online character. Also they'd need to come up with another way for how Trevor got his Impotent Rage figurine.
@@shockarmy100 You're partially right, Lester does mention Niko, but he says, "There was an Eastern-European guy, ah but he went quiet." That's Niko, the other one, the is your online character
The desert in gta v makes me feel like a warm summer night in the country. but what would also be cool is instead of them being connected you can fly to them via the international airport by going on flights that you are a passenger too
if you want multiple cities in a single game and want every area of the map to feel unique, then don’t complain about rockstar taking so long to release gta 6
@@xxxod ah I disagree, red dead redemption 2 took a long time to produce aswell and that was on ps4/Xbox one hardware. Imagine their possibilities with ps5/Xbox series x hardware.
Less limitations means more room for detail and expansion which will undoubtedly take time. Rockstar has made their name with simulation of life in their games so I know they’d take their time.
People need to stop playing gta online thats all and i read somewhere that rockstar stop making another single player dlc after realizing they didnt make money as much as their multiplayer dlc so please if they make one in the future consider buying it
cyberpunk has a nice concept, and story, but the fanbase defending that monstrosity and claiming that it's "100x better than gta" is what makes me lose interest in it
one thing that i do find really strange is how none of the dlc vehicles spawn in online traffic, meaning if you play alone it still feels like the 2013 map. would be cool to see some modern hypercars driving around, lowriders, electric cars and such
@@darthwarspite8544 it's more realistic. In real life you see the same old boring vehicles in boring colors. Very rarely do you ever see anything unique.
Yeah, I mean they finished RDR2 in late 2017, maybe early 2018. 3-4 years is NOT enough to create a game that's literally bigger and better than GTA V. I wish more people would understand this.
@@huzzzer6083 Yeah, I mean rdr2 starting being made in 2012 or 2013 (not sure of the exact year) so already it 5-6 years and to make a better game more time is needed. And although I don’t play rdo and gtao people say they care only about money, but imo I think they need the cash to make a great game.
See this is exact answer I want, now it takes games more than 3 years to create especially a gta 6 map that is over 100x bigger than gat 5's map, can't ppl be patient?
@@huzzzer6083 People see that it's been 8 years since a GTA and assume Rockstar is lazy, despite the release of RDR2, which sparked a controversy for overworking devs. Like you say, the actual amount of time Rockstar has had to develop a new GTA is likely only 3 or 4 years.
my parents are incredibly chill and let me play gta iv at a very young age and oh my god i loved it. see i grew up in suburban portland and had never really seen a proper big city except for the few times i got to go downtown, so gta 4 was like a paradise. i think gta 4 with it's unique aesthetic and colors and buildings sparked my love for big, dense urban environments that i can't shake to this day and gta 4 is the only gta game where i feel like i'm in a city, and when i was younger i would spend hours upon hours legit just *walking* around the city and looking at the buildings and i fucking loved it. it's nice to see someone talking about gta 4, i gotta see if my ps3 still works and play it
That’s true but GTA maps are far less though out in the long run like RDR where you actually have land mass surrounding the whole map making it possible for future expansions like how RDR2 was. All GTA games take place on an island which is very strange but a funny joke at how Americans see themselves making map expansions really strange as the area would magically appear the next time you jump in like it was always there. It’s also a universe thing how Los santos in both SA and GTA V are very different.
Problem is people who keep buying old game and shark cards. Common they should be ashamed by selling a 7 years old game and even using 9 years old trailer for the new console. You still don't know how it actually looks in PSV
Especially with the cancelled story mode dlc because to me after I completed story mode I felt it was half baked(mostly on franklins part and a bit on trevors too)
@Mercury Noone ever said they weren't, its just rockstar turned microtransactions into the only way to be good at the game and win, it became a pay to win game, which is the worst type of game to have when you involve multiplayer.
FishPants not at all, anyone who still doesnt have every money making opportunity in gta online is either new or simply shit at the game. everyone should have an upgraded mk2 by now
The problem: they’re so desperate for any money they could get going as far as making RDR Online cheap and tricking the new players into buying gold so they can get the new pass with a bonus of 10 gold which is only available in the first few days
Micro transactions are big now. Don’t blame rockstar, blame take two, they have the second greediest game of all time, NBA 2K is so fucking greedy. Your head would blow if you played that trash
Niko Bellic It’s not only Take Two it’s also Rockstar. Sure does Rockstar belong to Take Two but it’s not like EA where it’s a dictatorship over all the companies they own. Rockstar can make their own decisions and they decide to milk this game, it’s not Take Two only
its max the thing is , this game is not pay to win, and no one forces you to buy shark cards, but at the end of the day , they’re a business, they need to make money and make a profit
Me Or You I‘m not even gonna argue about it. Rockstar obviously only cares about the money and gives a shit about what the community wants, there’s no denying that. Of course no one forces you to buy a shark card, that’s not the case in any game. The point is that they are doing everything to get people to buy shark cards. Most if not all of the money making activities are made as tedious, boring and repetitive as possible and they slowly increase prices with every update, for example the VW Golf GTI that came out in the last dlc a week ago, they are charging 1.4 million for it. 1.4 MILLION! You don’t have to tell me they need to make money but they obviously value money over anything else, just one example is that they use p2p severs which are the cheapest available. They have many problems like people occasionally being stuck on the loading screen and much more. That further proves that they don’t care about the quality of their online game modes
@@Yunprek ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? What are you talking about? Gta online it's not even close to other games that literally force microtransactions on you. You can still play gta online and do heist and have fun especially if you are playing it with a group of friends
Even though Watch Dogs 1 barely even come close to Rockstar's level of map design and atmosphere I still think that if you look past the mediocre story and clunky controls it really feels like Chicago, the atmosphere is nice and looking at the city from far away looks just like Chicago. It captures that Chicago feel.
Oof, how could you not talk about Red Dead Redemption 2’s map? It literally covers 4 or 5 different states and does an incredible job at capturing their essence.
I can understand that rockstar doesn't add more cities because: bigger City= more players in one session= more modders in one session Rockstar could fix this problem by improving Modmenu detection. But I totally agree with you.
If Rockstar pays attention to detail, why do many vehicles lack a 3rd brake light, many vehicles even lack reverse lights and turn signals. Also not every vehicle have a fuel cap unlike GTA San Andreas. Many pedestrian lights are facing the wrong way, many intersections doesn't have pedestrian lights both end of crosswalks. Have Rockstar never seen a intersection in real life? Rockstar attention to details my ass. You can still can underwater or even up high in mountains, which isn't possible in real life. All motorcycles have radios, which in real life only some models do. In real life, submarines doesn't have radio that plays music. Not all motorcycles have radios at all. Rockstar doesn't really pay attention to details. Cars can still play music, even there's no radio unit. Traffic lights are fucked up in GTA V or any GTA games, many intersections get green lights turning rights onto flow of traffic. Even SCS Software are better at programming traffic lights, no cars will get a green light onto flow of traffic.
You could have a huge map without missions like that. I would like to play at one area of the map for some time, then go on a road trip to another part and stay there. Just like it was handled in the single player modes of the gta series.
Rockstar needs to get their heads out of their asses and listen out to us the community as well as do what you people said and add another city to the online world
I would love some kinda map expansion, I already spend hours in story mode driving up to paleto bay and back, so if gtao added new areas I’d be so much more motivated to hop on and either fly or drive from los santos to liberty city
Red Dead 2 is by far my favorite Rockstar title, for the characters and their storys through the fall of the wild west. Charles is my favorite(dont kill me for not saying Arthur) because he was the one who buried the ones most loyal to Dutch, Arthur and Susan. He was also a beast of a warrior, almost as good as Arthur
I still miss San Fierro and Las Venturas. It's interesting you note that the Salton Sea is south of Los Angeles and closer to San Diego, when Mt Diablo (the mountain that Mt Chilliad is based on) is north of Los Angeles and much closer to San Francisco
They also need to have every building in the game accessible to some degree. It would be fun to break into different houses and have some funny dialogue to go along with it. Maybe even some hidden special items you get from raiding special houses/buildings
Why the fuck would every building be accessible if that’s trespassing and that would be a huge game that would be a Terabyte or more. There’s no point anyways. We need Las Venturas and San Diego with Los Santos
One thing i really like is the interconnectivity of their games. That there's references to each game in Red Dead Redemption and GTA. You even have an old wild west photo of Arthur on his horse on Mr. Rubio's office on Cayo Perico. And it seems.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt should've been an honorable mention for an open world game that is on par with RDR2, etc. In the Witcher 3, there is great attention to detail with each region not only having its own unique atmosphere, but also having a distinct ethnic group for each region. There is also a bloody war happening in the background which is often reflected in the game world.
I don't really agree with that, just like in gta, once you beat the story in the Witcher it's an aggressively empty game, no one has new dialogue except for dlc and side missions mostly center around uneventful characters.
We give Rockstar a lot of shit for stuff like not releasing GTA 6, not making a Bully sequel or for what GTA Online has become, and rightfully so, but we have to appreciate their work and what they have put out through the years. My life would be different without Rockstars' titles.
They gave us RDR2 so give them time there in the works
Where the problem begins is on multiplayer and lack of added dlc content on some of their single player games.
Too much content yeah but you realize how much content they have put out through the years I don’t know any other games that have added that much tbh I think we’re just spoiled when it comes to gta
No matter how long they delay it, fact is we have to wait anyway and it will probably be an outstanding game
@Henrik K You gotta remember everyone is making a Open world.
Plus now they might have real competition with CDPR and Cyberpunk, so whatever they are doing they are gonna put their all. into it
Thanks for inviting me to collab! Rockstar's map design is such an interesting subject and they pack so much detail into them, I could practically spend hours talking about each one.
😎
Hi badger
I do drugs
@@yaboique6650 Ok
Thats why GTA was and still is my favourite game series. You can still find new details after playing it for years.
rockstar games rocks pal,its not a cyberpunk tragedy
Moin csyon
Minus the damn online bullshit!
I get it, they make millions from minors playing this adult game, because these kids want fancy ingame cloth.
But is such a shame that single player add ons died for this bullshit!
GTA 4 had so nice additional stories, that made you discover it’s whole world from a different perspective and that drew me in even more!
While story wise gta 5 is still my favorite (followed closely by San Andreas) it’s such a shame that there is no way to live in this world other than the main game.
It’s so sad, that they choose money over content.
They abandoned everything they stood for up to GTA 4, just because of money..
It’s a perfect example of capitalism gone wrong.
@@rolux4853 To be honest I’d rather they not put major resources towards expansions and let smaller teams like they do work on the online and have the head writers work on the next big project. In today’s age to make a very good expansion it would probably take 1-2 years compared to maybe 6-12 months like it did 10 years ago. The expectations has risen and the work to create the detail they’d want would be more.
@@jgooner94 with a full team it could still take less than 9 months for a good addition
I'm absolutely obsessed with their detail and realism. They really hit the nail on the head with red dead 2.
How so?
@@Ben-io2vo it’s good. That’s how
In the main story yes. But when we head into the epilogue after 8 years there’s no improvement nothing drastically new to it, it felt like a cop out. It was heading towards to the end of the Wild West era like it said so I wanted to see more movements to that, maybe dead towns from the ms turned into a populated town.
Rdr2 is tied with skyrim for my all time favorite game. Not only is its map massive ( bigger than even gta5's) but it feels so full, every 8nch populated with wildlife, npcs, activities and missions, Easter eggs, no part is left empty.
@@cjmurphy7967 ummm the rdr2 has been proven to be smaller than the gta v map.
Rockstar games are basically a love and hate relationship with their public
it's better to have a love-hate relationship. Ass-kissers are not as loyal.
@@xxxod true(EA sports crying 😢)
Im curious, why? I have never had anything but love for them, their games are all classics. Even with minor misses, they are miles ahead of any other game
I relate so much in life haha love hate relationship it's so true tho
@@pjetrs because everyone wants GTA 6. We’ve been waiting 7 years and have only got RDR2 during that time (which is beautiful).
Such an underrated channel. This video shows how much effort went into this. Keep up the good work mate.
preach man
Seriously
I think he’s been getting noticed more like 2 months ago when I started watching his channel he 20k subscribers and since then he’s gotten 34k subscribers
I wish we could give him subscribers
Yeah bro
L.A Noire is underrated too. Its interesting to see a 1940 - 1950s town era.
Especially the Hollywoodland Sign
There's not much to do in the open world of LA Noire, but damn if it isn't the most accurate video game map ever made. I can't imagine the amount of research it took to painstakingly recreate 1947 downtown LA, building by building and street by street. I really hope to see a map like that in the future.
IIRC even the house numbers are correct. You can google the address and see the same house in real life
One of the details that always got me in GTA IV was when you had an incoming call and you happened to be in a car;
You can hear a faint buzzing on the radio station moments before the call is connected.
That blew me away as that is so unbelievably true to life.
When I first heard it I looked for my real life phone.
No L.A. Noire? I know they didn't technically develop it, but the amount of research done to recreate 1940s L.A. was insane.
Agreed
too bad the open world is usless for that game
@@tardwrangler1019 true actually but it was fun to roam around after finishing the main campaign
@@tardwrangler1019 well just imagine like mafia, its linear but explorable worlds
Same with Midnight Club L.A. The most accurate depiction of modern L.A.
Trust me dude, not matter how big the map is, you don’t want 300 players in a lobby at once
Max 60-100 in my opinion
PentaBOSS Not everyone has good internet though
Imagine having 50+ Oppressor Mk2 flying around the map
I feel like having that many players at once would just break the game
Razor jaw86 then they’ll lag out. Bye bye.
R*’s map design is why people think we all live in a simulation
Exactly
I mean we theoretically could be
We could just be inside a book and God is the author and assuming every character in a story people create is alive, then i feel bad for the people who live in the universe where their God just straight up destroy them 24/7
@@MinogFarted lmao
I want to live in rockstar worlds. It's better than real.
I think one big thing Rockstar needs is more interiors in GTA. Even if it’s just the podium/lobby areas for skyscrapers and then maybe one or two floors near the top, that’s still more than most of what they’ve got now. And what about that huge mall near the Ponsonby’s? That would’ve been great to have a lot of stores in. I also think more overall world interaction would be good; I miss that they took out the ability to go into a Burger Shot or the chicken place and actually sit down and eat, for example.
I would like to explore airports.
@@justanotherghost4589 Or actually be able to order at Burger Shot or Clucking Bell again. Go to the gym and actually get ripped. They had tennis, so why not be able to use the gym equipment on the beach?
To think they did that in V to give us gorgeous underwater
Honestly for me it’s even if it wasn’t a seemless transition I’d still be fine if they just brought it back at least
4 had that with a lot of locations. Anywhere you could enter for missions was open, and there were even some extra places. V was lacking in so many areas tbh
biggest proof of this video is how memorable rockstars maps are. You could send me a photo of a random curb or store in gta, and I'd be able to tell you where it is on the map instantly.
facts..
i know GTAV's map better than my own city, and i know my city like the back of my hand haha
Hello Goro Dogima
San Andreas for me its so memorable
Who wants to bet this guy can do this.
One of the highest quality videos I’ve ever seen on RUclips definitely underrated
Thank you! Very kind words.
I agree and I’m only 40 seconds into it. Great work!
this is like something on the discovery channel
damn
Honestly, check out the fake humanity video the intro is very good
1000th like! Nice!
Watching this after the GTA trilogy definitive edition was released... Kinda feels like a kick in the teeth seeing how low Rockstar have stooped
My thoughts exactly, tragic really...
They were lazy n hired the wrong ppl for the job
But dude, why are we rockstar fans so selfish... Rhey are busy creating whats about to be the biggest game for decades just for us, so that we dont feel like we waste 60usd... These type of games only come out once every 10 years... Watch when gta 6 releases, everyone will jump back and suck rockstar's dick again just like how they did after rdr2 dropped .... Before rdr2 dropped, people were trashing on rockstar for online.... But when rdr2 released, all of a sudden, Rockstar is king... Now that rdr2 is aging(that game doesnt age though, ive never seen a game so ahead of its time) people are back at trashing rockstar... Then when gta 6 drops, its the same shit... And dont say it wont be the same because Of Dan and lezlie.... There is only 1 VIP in rockstar, if he leaves its the end of rockstar games, and thats Phil Hooker, Leading Director of Technology and programming in Rockstar Studios... Calm down Rockstar is working in something huge, thats why expanded and enhanced and the trilogy are ass
They didn't make it lol. They did fuck up though by tasking mobile phone game developers to do the job. It should of been done in house and all 3 classics should of got the mafia treatment but on the gta 5 engine.
I love how people just completely forget about RDR 2 as if it wasn't the last thing they've made. Grove Street Games handled the trilogy remasters. And yeah, that was a really dumb decision, but it's not a situation where Rockstar just completely forgot how to make good games. They chose poorly. Wait until GTA VI before you start assuming the worst. I know I sound like a fanboy (and I kinda am, I guess) but people shouldn't panic before we even have a glimpse of VI.
San Diego has huge potential for a GTA game. It's right on the border with Mexico (cartels, people smuggling?), has lots of military bases (secret weapons and stealth break-in missions?) and has a huge biomedical industry, which has a story potential too.
id like chacargo aswell
I’d like a gta set in like Canada, New England or the Pacific Northwest
What about an GTA set in Atlanta?
@drippydooku6347 Chacargo??? 😂 Holy shit our schools are abysmal
Ocean: "Urrh, already said too much bad things about Rockstar. Let's do the reverse"
At this point we gotta accept R* is gonna take forever for GTA 6 and will continue to milk the shit out of GTA 5 Online so why not just focus on the positive and push Rockstar to make GTA 6 an absolute banger?
@@mog7501 I agree
@@mog7501 they went overboard with RDR 2 times over which led to a reform. There's nothing you can push for gta 6, gta online is so broken everywhere, cuckstar needs to address the game breaking bugs
@@riptidev10 you must have a shite pc to even complain the slightest bugs, this channel already tells you to DO NOT play the online mode
@@mog7501lol
I know Southern San Andreas(GTA5 Map) better than my own hometown. I can navigate without a map or GPS. Rockstar did such a good job to make the world feel real. I may have been born in Massachusetts but I was raised in San Andreas.
Damn, very well said.
That's sad, raised in a gta game 😂
C B bruh it was a play on words
@@Bindogz he wasn't actually raised in it lol just played it a lit
Imagine having low emotional intelligence
My favorite party about GTA IV is the fact when recreating New York, Rockstar did what we wish we could all do and sank Staten Island into the sea
This reminds me of the first time I went to New York and being absolutely blown away by how many things I were able to recognize after playing gta 4 as a kid. It made me kinda feel at home in a city I've never seen before.
@@MaxB00M man I wish I could go to New York and LA someday and experience familiarity due to hours of playing GTA 4 and 5. Unfortunately I'm in a third world asian country
Sink Staten Island?? Dont you already know?? Wu-Tang aint nothing to fuck with......
@@MaxB00M i'd probably be able to find myself and where i am without needing a map in LA
The map expansion thing aged like milk...
They did make Cayo Perico though so... you’re partially correct
Bro what expansion?
Its just a misson map with poor optimization and vibranium trees/bushes
@@batuu5166 yeah I said he was partially correct
@@batuu5166 it wasn’t too much of a map expansion anyways
@@batuu5166 Hah, poor optimization? Try out GTAIV on PC 😂
2008 really was an incredible year for open world games:
GTA IV
Saints Row 2
Burnout Paradise
Fallout 3
just to name a few
And Rockstar's Midnight Club: Los Angeles!
And Rockstar's Midnight Club: Los Angeles!
How the hell did I forget Rockstar Game's Midnight Club: Los Angeles? I've spent more hours of my life than I'd care to admit in that game!
And Rockstar’s Midnight Club:Los Angeles!
And Rockstar’s Midnight Club: Los Angeles!
that intro legit just made me get chills that was amazing
ikr
Have your.100th like
Except for the music :/ that was garbage
Nah that intro was 🚮
It’s like rockstar making an official promo
I've been replaying gta 3 and even for a 2001 game, the map is really impressive, the ambience, really feels like its own world on a parallel universe
I love how when talking about the problems on gtao all he had to do was show a picture of the Mk2 lol
The MK2 has good
@@mrk3655 ewww (get off chair) (Screams WTF)
@@gaveup1504 I think I had a stroke when writing that or something
MK2 is an excellent choice for grinding ! Unfortunately kids using it for the wrong purpose!
“When you play a game from rockstar you can tell that they woeked hard to sell you, not a map, but a reality”
A reality with flying motercycles with rockets
The people who made the map and game are not the people who make gta online
@mo gamer rockstar created some new vehicles that r possible to create in real life like how does the ufo's fly whit no motors? They r advanced civilization, we r not advanced as those people, so ya in movies they said it possible to have a flying car, and the oppressor it a small jet engine and small wings it possible to build those but we need to advance whit technology before building stuff like this
Well they did sell the reality first but with the help of updates that reality has fled
@mo gamer yeah, that was just a move on rockstar part who wants get more milk than the cow can give, i am tired of gta v. yeah it's a great game but i already finished the story game 5 times and the online. don't even talk about it. full of oppressor mk2s and 10 year old kids, killing you the moment you spawn on the map. yikes i don't even imagine getting around the map without being exploded
They said a reality not realistic 😂😂
EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THİS CHANNEL DUDE İTS SOOOO GOOD
How’d you get out of karlson?
@@bakbanaantjed8508 computers
Shut up thicc Billy
Yo billy wtf? How did you escape from the basement?
Frick billy
Saints Row 2 was criminally underrated.
Bro literally
its probably one of the best open world games even by today
It's so sad how bad they messed that franchise up they could have just keep doing what they did in the second one ... Update map cars guns clothes and get a new story and it'd still be a great game with a graphics update
TLDR: they suggest a few things that range from “might be possible” to “sending game makers to the torture chambers”. Even only keeping suggestions to “might be possible” can lead to catastrophic failure while making such a game.
Non game devs talking about what they’d want from a game. It’s hopeful but not possible. Add too many systems to a game which might clash then you’ll be dealing with more and more bugs. A massive landscape is totally possible to make within a game, even if it’ll take a stupid amount of time, but adding destruction to each building? That’s a piss take and a nightmare for artists, developers and technical artists. 300 players is also a stretch (and hell with destruction physics). Possible, but a stretch. It’d be easier on their servers to make it possible to seamlessly slide in and out of servers depending on what region of the map you were in, with a proximity chat, but that’s still a stretch.
Shit I can imagine the lag you would get from destructive environment
Destruction to buildings is probably the dumbest thing anyone can ask rockstar to do. It’s cool but pointless when there’s already so much attention to detail in these games that already make you feel like you’re in a real world.
@@tunacanjerry8693 yea it makes no sense for gta, its works in bf because it's a sandbox shooter with matches and limited chaos that resets every game.
This channel has a better production quality than some professional multi million dollar companies
It has so much overediting, I can't focus on a single thing in a video
The reverb in his voice is so weird and jilted
@@CuteSkyler I agree, the reverb is out. Audio is honestly my biggest weakness so I'm working harder at it for the next video. Addressing the over editing, idk man, that's just the point of the video - to be very edited.
I never noticed any issues with audio or overediting
Take two *cough* cough*
I've randomly stumbled upon this video in my recommended to then see myself mentioned in it. Small world, uh. Great video!
Glad to see you back on this channel!
If anything. The competition needs to step up. Rockstars making billions of a game that is close to 10 years old. You are telling me other big studios can't invest to create a good match?
The maps not even the problem, Watchdogs 2 has a good map despite repeated assets. The problem is the game engine, driving and shooting in the other open world games is atrocious. And even if one turns good, the other doesn't. CoD Warfare is open world, obviously the shooting is better than GTA(not by a lot), but the driving is atrocious, worse than watchdogs(or cyberpunk).
Rockstar is just too comfortable to make anything fresh. They are asleep at the throne.
That is true never thought about it
There asleep on a throne of selling Sharkcards. Wow pretty mindblowing.
I legit love that gtav has the map open from the beginning.
Its more immersive and allows players to do what they think is fun.
Nah, it ruined exploration. In the other games I get to spend time exploring each area as the story progresses and I get familiar with it all, in V I couldn't tell you how to get anywhere from anywhere because I'd just drive all over the place between missions lmao
The production quality of this video is astonishing, promise me you will keep it that way!
It's a promise!
Fangirl
"You can find the smallest of details in the biggest feature of every GTA game"
Same thing with your videos.
Ass kiss
@@PabloRodriguez-cl4ox lmao my thoughts exactly.
Bro the edits have me amazed
@@PabloRodriguez-cl4ox cry about it.
As someone who grew up in New York, everytime I play GTA 4 I get nostalgia. Everything from the Duplexes near the train tracks to the tolls you have to pass in order to get to NJ captures the exact feeling of what it’s like to be in NY.
I remember driving through gta 4’s version of Times Square. It was so breathtaking to me.
What is underappreciated in terms of RDR2 map design is that they made a large state (New Austin) with loads of easter eggs, two towns and more, when you never go there in the story or in side quests. You're only able to go there starting the Epilogue. That's genuine commitment
Mafia 1 did this as well with the city of Lost Heaven having a countryside outside of the city map where you only really go for a number of missions to single locations but Instead they made a whole area 90% you will never go in the story.
Well its the map of rdr 1 so they didn't make it just for rdr2. But it's cool tjat they included it, i would love to see San Fierro or Las Venturas in GTA V
@@htmlrulezd00d99 i believe they tried but the current console of that gen would not be able to hold such a big map at the time so they expand the map using mountain and plain field instead.
They also believe it or not have Mexico from rdr1 in there too. It’s really well made but not rendered correctly and missing walls in some buildings but it’s still really impressive
Fun Fact: rockstar only put new austin because the RDR2 map was leaked and they wanted to include something to suprise people. Thats why new austin might seem rushed or empty. (imo they did everything they could because john cant really do anything there story wise other then bounty hunt and stranger missions could of been cool but at the same time it would just feel like rdr1 again)
5:17 I already have 2 reasons to leave the city
1. My bunker is at the very tip of the map
2. It’s just fun!
And also just standing on top of Mount Chilliad, admiring the view is amazing.
@@huzzzer6083 true
Not as san andreas...., I really feel lazy to go to paleto Bay
You should get a zancudo or chumash bunker as paleto bunker kinda sucks
I have my bunker and my 3 MC businesses in Grand Senora, but it is true that i don't visit Paleto Bay that much outside of setups and resupplies but it isn't that bad
It’s this level of detail that keeps me playing their games over any other. But they’re so mean to us
Such a shame then, the drought of GTA/Rockstar maps in past 10 years, compared to the previous 10 years prior to them
A ''reality'' with flying bikes that shoot missiles in seconds
That's only in GTA Onl**e, which I hate by the way
I like to think of GTA ONLINE as non canon. Like undead nightmare in RDR
@@e14ee that's what they should say, but they make references in Story Mode to Online. Like Lester saying there is one other person but they're too unpredictable, he's talking about your Online character. Also they'd need to come up with another way for how Trevor got his Impotent Rage figurine.
Moises Guzman no, I think it was about Niko, even mentioned it was in liberty city
@@shockarmy100 You're partially right, Lester does mention Niko, but he says, "There was an Eastern-European guy, ah but he went quiet." That's Niko, the other one, the is your online character
Rockstar never opened the burger shop that were open in GTA 4 in GTA 5, it was one of the first places I tried to get into.
also gta san andreas has burger shop
Karl Taylor you can still get food from a gas station
@@anuarudinbadawi428 gta vice city too
@@mrk3655 but its not the same
@@Zman201 food is food, there are different kinds of it.
1:42
GTAOnline: I’m gonna end this man’s hole career.
I love how we can love and appreciate the old rockstar achivenments and still compelety roast them for GTA online's mess
to be honest porting every map of gta into one big map sounds cool but imagine the file size of such a map. probably 250-300gb?
Not to mention starting up the game every time would take longer than GTA V takes now
@@PolarisCastillo lol ps5 is capable of loading 5gb a second or some shit
Well the things is, if u put them all together, you have to change the textures of the maps before GTA v, it's a huge amount of work.
@@benjaminkaric2874 and huge maps like gta San Andreas have to be redone from scratch. That's adds up to the work
@@RadionYT GTA SA map is not huge, it's actually pretty small
“The map”
Yea that same map where that skyscraper never got finished in the span of 8 years.
Canonically the Mile High Club building is over 30 years old.
@@mangaming1942 it is? how ?
It will be finished in a new gta online update!
Maybe before story mode it got robbed and they quit building it
What do you think will be in the "Expanded and Enhanced" GTA V? Obviously the completed building.
The desert in gta v makes me feel like a warm summer night in the country. but what would also be cool is instead of them being connected you can fly to them via the international airport by going on flights that you are a passenger too
10:50 I love the paper maps! I also have one from Test Drive Unlimited and I remember Midtown Madness 2 having maps in the manual.
yeah, rockstar's maps are beautiful, lively, and extremely well made, but this video is on another level.
if you want multiple cities in a single game and want every area of the map to feel unique, then don’t complain about rockstar taking so long to release gta 6
They statistically shouldn't take this long even with all those features
@@xxxod ah I disagree, red dead redemption 2 took a long time to produce aswell and that was on ps4/Xbox one hardware. Imagine their possibilities with ps5/Xbox series x hardware.
@@borismurillo2834 they use computers to make video games
@@thegamelabgaming7556 I didn’t mean literally on their hardware, I meant FOR that hardware in mind, with the limitations of the system architecture.
Less limitations means more room for detail and expansion which will undoubtedly take time. Rockstar has made their name with simulation of life in their games so I know they’d take their time.
5:02 “as we see here, the oppressor mk 2 in its natural habitat”
I recognize the whole map more than my hometown
Rockstar knows how to make a good game, they seem to lack the knowledge or heart to keep it alive.
More like rockstar would be consumer friendly if they weren't owned by greedy take two
Yeah, unfortunately money changes things and now they know what they can do and will continue unless people stopped playing their shit altogether
People need to stop playing gta online thats all and i read somewhere that rockstar stop making another single player dlc after realizing they didnt make money as much as their multiplayer dlc so please if they make one in the future consider buying it
@@ob1934 Rockstar is greedy too but Take 2 is even worse
@mo gamer It’s NOT mostly Take 2, it’s the same with Rockstar. Unfortunately
No other game's car handling physics, sounds, ambient noices, character and NPC details even comes close to GTA games. Not even Cyberpunk could do it.
cyberpunk has a nice concept, and story, but the fanbase defending that monstrosity and claiming that it's "100x better than gta" is what makes me lose interest in it
Cyberpunk couldnt do anything
@@xenthia It's a mediocre game which was ruined by bad decisions and being pushed out too early.
@@xenthia lol I'm already done playing cyberpunk but still playing gta after all these years
LOL what do you mean "not even Cyberpunk could do it" Cyberpunk is trash!
9:13 "now that GTA V is going to be expanded and enhanced"
2021: ...yea, about that
The amount of chaos from 300 players would be absolute madness
As a staten islander the pain is intense that my home was missed out in gta4.
😭😭😭😭
Ever meet Vinny?
ANOTHER MASTERPIECE!
Hello Mr. Clickbait
@@LonelyDriver99 bruuu. 😆
@@LonelyDriver99 I feel bad for him but you're spittin' truth.
@@LonelyDriver99 He's a cool but he and Mr.Boss are the masters of Clickbait
Sup Zac
production quality of this video is just marvelous
Bro i have no idea how i have not heard of thia channel before, you got a new subscriber
one thing that i do find really strange is how none of the dlc vehicles spawn in online traffic, meaning if you play alone it still feels like the 2013 map. would be cool to see some modern hypercars driving around, lowriders, electric cars and such
Forreal it's the same old cars they also should have put online cars in Single player
@@darthwarspite8544 I started playing Online because all those cars weren't available in Single Player.
@@darthwarspite8544 it's more realistic. In real life you see the same old boring vehicles in boring colors. Very rarely do you ever see anything unique.
The reason gta 6 is taking so much time is basically it’s going to be a real life simulator
Yeah, I mean they finished RDR2 in late 2017, maybe early 2018. 3-4 years is NOT enough to create a game that's literally bigger and better than GTA V. I wish more people would understand this.
@@huzzzer6083 Yeah, I mean rdr2 starting being made in 2012 or 2013 (not sure of the exact year) so already it 5-6 years and to make a better game more time is needed. And although I don’t play rdo and gtao people say they care only about money, but imo I think they need the cash to make a great game.
See this is exact answer I want, now it takes games more than 3 years to create especially a gta 6 map that is over 100x bigger than gat 5's map, can't ppl be patient?
i hope so, i hope online is a role play simulator
@@huzzzer6083 People see that it's been 8 years since a GTA and assume Rockstar is lazy, despite the release of RDR2, which sparked a controversy for overworking devs. Like you say, the actual amount of time Rockstar has had to develop a new GTA is likely only 3 or 4 years.
my parents are incredibly chill and let me play gta iv at a very young age and oh my god i loved it. see i grew up in suburban portland and had never really seen a proper big city except for the few times i got to go downtown, so gta 4 was like a paradise. i think gta 4 with it's unique aesthetic and colors and buildings sparked my love for big, dense urban environments that i can't shake to this day and gta 4 is the only gta game where i feel like i'm in a city, and when i was younger i would spend hours upon hours legit just *walking* around the city and looking at the buildings and i fucking loved it. it's nice to see someone talking about gta 4, i gotta see if my ps3 still works and play it
I FINALLY FOUND THIS VIDEO, I've been searching this video since September, and now I can finally tell you thanks, this video is just perfect
I agree, having San Diego as a subsection of the GTA 5 map would have been awesome. We could have had a Comic Con mission with Trevor.
That’s true but GTA maps are far less though out in the long run like RDR where you actually have land mass surrounding the whole map making it possible for future expansions like how RDR2 was. All GTA games take place on an island which is very strange but a funny joke at how Americans see themselves making map expansions really strange as the area would magically appear the next time you jump in like it was always there. It’s also a universe thing how Los santos in both SA and GTA V are very different.
comic con?
@@CaptainAmercia Honestly just making another island that you can fly or sail to is probably a better idea.
@@CaptainAmercia kinda like the GTA V los santos is 20 years in the future
It sucks that rockstar ruined what could've been an amazing aspect, gta online. They ruined it by corporate greed. But great video, loved the editing.
Problem is people who keep buying old game and shark cards. Common they should be ashamed by selling a 7 years old game and even using 9 years old trailer for the new console.
You still don't know how it actually looks in PSV
Especially with the cancelled story mode dlc because to me after I completed story mode I felt it was half baked(mostly on franklins part and a bit on trevors too)
@Mercury Noone ever said they weren't, its just rockstar turned microtransactions into the only way to be good at the game and win, it became a pay to win game, which is the worst type of game to have when you involve multiplayer.
@Mercury Ah yes, such great game design, playing a multiplayer game in solo because that's the only way to actually enjoy it
FishPants not at all, anyone who still doesnt have every money making opportunity in gta online is either new or simply shit at the game. everyone should have an upgraded mk2 by now
The quality of this is insane
Most remarkable thing here is the edits of this video
The problem: they’re so desperate for any money they could get going as far as making RDR Online cheap and tricking the new players into buying gold so they can get the new pass with a bonus of 10 gold which is only available in the first few days
Micro transactions are big now. Don’t blame rockstar, blame take two, they have the second greediest game of all time, NBA 2K is so fucking greedy. Your head would blow if you played that trash
Niko Bellic It’s not only Take Two it’s also Rockstar. Sure does Rockstar belong to Take Two but it’s not like EA where it’s a dictatorship over all the companies they own. Rockstar can make their own decisions and they decide to milk this game, it’s not Take Two only
its max the thing is , this game is not pay to win, and no one forces you to buy shark cards, but at the end of the day , they’re a business, they need to make money and make a profit
Me Or You I‘m not even gonna argue about it. Rockstar obviously only cares about the money and gives a shit about what the community wants, there’s no denying that. Of course no one forces you to buy a shark card, that’s not the case in any game. The point is that they are doing everything to get people to buy shark cards. Most if not all of the money making activities are made as tedious, boring and repetitive as possible and they slowly increase prices with every update, for example the VW Golf GTI that came out in the last dlc a week ago, they are charging 1.4 million for it. 1.4 MILLION! You don’t have to tell me they need to make money but they obviously value money over anything else, just one example is that they use p2p severs which are the cheapest available. They have many problems like people occasionally being stuck on the loading screen and much more. That further proves that they don’t care about the quality of their online game modes
@@Yunprek ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? What are you talking about? Gta online it's not even close to other games that literally force microtransactions on you. You can still play gta online and do heist and have fun especially if you are playing it with a group of friends
Even though Watch Dogs 1 barely even come close to Rockstar's level of map design and atmosphere I still think that if you look past the mediocre story and clunky controls it really feels like Chicago, the atmosphere is nice and looking at the city from far away looks just like Chicago. It captures that Chicago feel.
Plus, Car design is pretty good in Watch Dogs too, they don't feel as, "Real life car but with thing added to it." as some of Rockstar's cars.
@@nickrustyson8124 They feel like crap to drive, though.
@@thearousedeunuch meh they feel fine ( coming from someone who likes gta 4 driving )
The story was not mediocre rather it was garbage. Ubisoft made a very bad decision making that game, and luckily Ubisoft is recovering
watch dogs 1's world honestly felt more real than gta 5 ever did to me
I feel like this video never gets anywhere. Watching it was a weird experience but a good one.
Oof, how could you not talk about Red Dead Redemption 2’s map? It literally covers 4 or 5 different states and does an incredible job at capturing their essence.
Ikr, the unfinished part of the map (mexico) has less repeated assets than the entire watch dogs 2 map
Yeah but the cities are way smaller and it fits but you can’t have cities that small in GTA. San Diego can’t be a a couple dozen streets
@@raaaaaaaaaam496 maybe because it’s in the Wild West lmao
@@hythe4936 yeah nice observation genius
the editing tho 😍
If only Rockstar saw this video, it does a really good job explaining why their should be multiple cities, and why we need an upgraded map
Fr I really don’t know why they didn’t add a second City in the GTA V map
As a staten islander seeing Badger discuss the desire to include Staten Island in GTA IV’s map just warms my heart.
I can understand that rockstar doesn't add more cities because:
bigger City=
more players in one session=
more modders in one session
Rockstar could fix this problem by improving Modmenu detection.
But I totally agree with you.
I like how every single time I talk about Rockstar’s attention to detail, everyone shits on my opinion simply because of their thoughts on GTA Online
@Lurker M so gta 5 (not gta online), gta 4, gta San Andreas, red dead redemption, and bully don’t have proper detail?
@Lurker M In my opinion, the detail in gta San Andreas and bully were very good for the time due to limited storage and hardware.
@Lurker M if a game was made before detail standards were raised how the hell do you think they are gonna meet them
If Rockstar pays attention to detail, why do many vehicles lack a 3rd brake light, many vehicles even lack reverse lights and turn signals.
Also not every vehicle have a fuel cap unlike GTA San Andreas. Many pedestrian lights are facing the wrong way, many intersections doesn't have pedestrian lights both end of crosswalks. Have Rockstar never seen a intersection in real life? Rockstar attention to details my ass.
You can still can underwater or even up high in mountains, which isn't possible in real life. All motorcycles have radios, which in real life only some models do.
In real life, submarines doesn't have radio that plays music. Not all motorcycles have radios at all. Rockstar doesn't really pay attention to details.
Cars can still play music, even there's no radio unit.
Traffic lights are fucked up in GTA V or any GTA games, many intersections get green lights turning rights onto flow of traffic. Even SCS Software are better at programming traffic lights, no cars will get a green light onto flow of traffic.
@@automation7295 its not traffic simulator holy shit man, no need to write 4 paragraphs about turn signals.
Everyone want a huge map in online, until they have to sell things in one side of the map from another side, but really great video tho.
My god I never even thought of that
or steal a plane from one side of the map and fly it farther than the edge of the map
You could have a huge map without missions like that. I would like to play at one area of the map for some time, then go on a road trip to another part and stay there. Just like it was handled in the single player modes of the gta series.
Rockstar needs to get their heads out of their asses and listen out to us the community as well as do what you people said and add another city to the online world
If the money is good then it's fine
I would love some kinda map expansion, I already spend hours in story mode driving up to paleto bay and back, so if gtao added new areas I’d be so much more motivated to hop on and either fly or drive from los santos to liberty city
Pretty cool that they put Santa Monica ( the pier in gta 5) into the game I was there like two years ago and they did a good job replicating it
10:20
I'm pretty sure every single building on the map would be rubble about half an hour after that update would come out 😂
So would your pc or console 😂
@@fuziking505 true lol
Red Dead 2 is by far my favorite Rockstar title, for the characters and their storys through the fall of the wild west. Charles is my favorite(dont kill me for not saying Arthur) because he was the one who buried the ones most loyal to Dutch, Arthur and Susan. He was also a beast of a warrior, almost as good as Arthur
It good man both Charles and Arthur and John aswell are amazin
I still miss San Fierro and Las Venturas.
It's interesting you note that the Salton Sea is south of Los Angeles and closer to San Diego, when Mt Diablo (the mountain that Mt Chilliad is based on) is north of Los Angeles and much closer to San Francisco
Wow great video actually had me thinking about rockstar maps and games in a way I never had. Instant subscribe can’t wait to see more from you
8:34 "Raise the player cap from 32 to 300"
*Loading times* : So you've chosen death
No
@@Infernuth yes
This joke is more overused than the shitty game your channel is based on
@@fuckyoutube75889 what game? Oh you mean the thing i've been ignoring since it came out... yeah that game doesn't exist.
6:45 I hate that guy!
came here to make that same comment, you beat me too it. nice
Lol
@@Alexzw92 Lol weirdo
So do I
Woah zac I haven't seen one of your videos since I was like 9. Back when I believed you clickbait titles and thumbnails
0:01 That aged well!
That's my childhood dream making all maps in one single GTA!!
Maybe in gta 10
They also need to have every building in the game accessible to some degree. It would be fun to break into different houses and have some funny dialogue to go along with it. Maybe even some hidden special items you get from raiding special houses/buildings
Maybe a random chance Easter egg where someone mentions this isn't legend of Zelda (or GTA's in-game version) and barge into people's houses.
Kind of like assasin's creed unity where you eneter some houses from the window or some shit
At least public areas such as shopping mals
Why the fuck would every building be accessible if that’s trespassing and that would be a huge game that would be a Terabyte or more. There’s no point anyways. We need Las Venturas and San Diego with Los Santos
Like the gta SA burglary side missions
The editing is insanely well done!
One thing i really like is the interconnectivity of their games. That there's references to each game in Red Dead Redemption and GTA. You even have an old wild west photo of Arthur on his horse on Mr. Rubio's office on Cayo Perico. And it seems.
the editing in this video is absolutely insane, good job!
"every building is unique"
small shops: throw my beer off a cliff
the two best rockstar content creators in one video Absolutely beautiful
You forgot to mention the ultor building and hidden mountain base. SR2 was one of my all time favorite maps
You know it is a good video when Badger is in it
Is this the Discovery Chanel ??
Man this editing is God Level !!!!
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt should've been an honorable mention for an open world game that is on par with RDR2, etc. In the Witcher 3, there is great attention to detail with each region not only having its own unique atmosphere, but also having a distinct ethnic group for each region. There is also a bloody war happening in the background which is often reflected in the game world.
I don't really agree with that, just like in gta, once you beat the story in the Witcher it's an aggressively empty game, no one has new dialogue except for dlc and side missions mostly center around uneventful characters.
But the story itself is far more open and every quests is actually a real thing not a filler like a lot of games (gta included) do
Rockstar Games: What's Staten island?
New York: What's Staten island?
The editing is so awesome holy cow!