No the SVD wasn't designed by Kalashnikov, it was designed by some other person (forgot his name) using his own design. Though some parts were taken from the AK platform, such as the safety and some of the trigger group, it's still a very different gun. The SVD has a milled receiver, the action is a completely different beast, and there are many other changes to allow the gun to fire the 7.62x54R round accurately.
@141235a I already said it is better in terms of damage. But the AK variants, no matter how much you attempt to upgrade it, will never reach the range/accuracy of american rifles (or any other modern, high end rifles.)
@pavel280488AA Thats a new model of AK the AK 101 - its basically plastic but still has the mechanics of the 47 with less weight - Really cool weapon - can't wait to try one out properly :D
@BigBossIvan How so? I just said russians are planning to replace the outdated AK series with the AN-94, which is a huge improvement. However, I cannot argue with somone who says "At most engagement distances modern AK's are far more than accurate enough to do the job" Really, just no.
@XplosiveProductZ AK101 is 5,56x45 nato round velocity is about 3000 ft per second, a lot more accurate than the 47.. AK47 is 7,62x39 (muzzle velocity is about 2300 ft per second, more killing power, less accurate) If your going for an AK, Buy Russian, not cheap knockoffs.
the mp44 was the first assualt rifle, the ak47 was a modification from that. So please reply more about how your right and i am some how wrong. Google is your friend :)
@BigBossIvan i am from serbia and the yugo ak is a serbia yugoslavia doesnt exist eny more the "yugo" ak witch is manufactured in kragujevac serbia by zastava is caled m70 and it is not compleatly the same as an ak
Поверьте мне этот АК не сделан в России,судя по магазину АК сделан под НАТО патрон.А в армии у меня был АК-74 5.45мм ни одной задержки за 2 года службы на Севере!!!Я границу охранял!!!
It's funny how you accuse him of being a "COD4 expert" while using the word "noob". Why don't you both challenge each other to a video game duel, and the AK 101 fires a 5.56 round.
Russia sells out-of-date samples copies of other countries all rest without observance of "know-how" as a rule such weapon is lowered on fighting qualities many times over
@blobguy1212 Oh please,Everyone knows the AK has better Reliability and damage, but everyone ALSO knows the american rifles have better Accuracy and range. Just shut up, even if the AK is better, americans still have access to it.
The picture of an AK101 I'm looking at right now (wikipedia) shows a smooth receiver right above the mag well, but in the vid it has the longer depression above it like those with milled receivers. Maybe the Army's upgrading its OpFor weapons with plastic furniture?
Hmmm, an impressive shoot day at one of America's most well known Military Academies. AWESOME!! The caliber for the AK-101 is the same as the Ak-74, right?
@blobguy1212 Not all battlefields are Swamp/Muddy conditions. In wide open spaces and urban enviroments, the M16 is a better choice. Also, The M16 is far more reliable then it was during Veitnam, and that is somthing that many AK fanboys dont touch on. Just beacuse the AK is like 99.9 reliable, doesnt mean the American weapons of today are horrible unreliable, they are actually pretty good in terms of reliabilty.
@blobguy1212 The AK still has horrible accuracy and range, somthing which I dispise of. I have already admitted the AK is like 99.9% reliable, but to me, thats the only real strength (and its cheapness). Stuff like Recoil, Accuracy, Range, weight, and iron sights are all very poor on the AK-47.
It that for a deer wearing spectacles shoots from АК? Is he the American soldier? He does not know as correctly to discharge the weapon. At first the empty shop is cleaned. The shutter is then cocked and control descent is made. At us in Russian army it would receive from the officer a kick on a nape for it)))
the first ak47 was built in 1934 on designs of the german m944. He was a tank gunner and wounded during ww1, while he was healign he made the first ak47, its was a very ugly gun, but it had modifications to it,
@BigBossIvan so you are saying that all russian weapons manufactured by izhsmash are kalashnikov rifles? even its the rifle was designed by Gennady Nikonov and uses a totally diferent mechanism? do you really know why there is a family of kalashnikov weapons all based in the original AK-47 design and why are they called "kalishnikov", let me tell you something AN-94 its not a kalashnikov rifle at all. mihail kalashnikov and their designs didnt inspired this weapon at all.
@Tiger66261 your talking as if the m-16 has improved and everyone still uses AK-47. the AK has also improved becoming much more accurate then it used to be. american weapons are not horribly unrliable, but they do jam, or stop working, maybe it started raining, maybe you had to swim across a river. but i know that i can rely on an ak no matter what weather or any conditions are.
That is not AK-101 that is a Bulgarian knock-off called SA M-5... It has milled receiver (Ak-101 is stamped), is an underfolder (AK-101 is a sidefolder), and has a wrong compensator...
@blobguy1212 Well, The only new version I would give credit to is the AK 103/104, only beacuse it is the only real AK that can use a large variety of attachments. But even then, they are still found with a large lack of accuracy and range compared to real modern Rifles of today (the AK 103/104 is really just a AK-74 with better materials.) Due to the inadequate accuracy and range of the AK series, the russians needed to replace the AK with the AN-94, and that is enough proof.
@Tiger66261 Clearly you've never seen or heard of the AN-94 Abakan rifle then... But I digress, in my experience I have been appalled by how much our American M16 weapons system jams from the range, to training, to it's almost 20% rate of failure in combat (thankfully never saw the last one).... At most engagement distances modern AK's are far more than accurate enough to do the job and having a rifle that does not jam is the difference between life and death.
personally, as an american, i prefer an adopting of an ak in the standard nato round. i think one already exists, i think it is the ak101 but im not positive. we can just modify it with a picatinny rail on top for sights and it would still be cheaper than an ar15/m16 style weapon, or maybe adopt the finnish valmet that is said to be the most accurate AK variant in widespread service.
This weapon is a misterious shit. You can see by looking at the reciver that this is AKS reciver, not AKM/AKMS) or AK-74/AKS-74 (AKS-47 for those who think such a weapon exists). AK-101 is basically AK-74M chambered in 5.56 x 45. It uses magazines curved like this one. However this stock and whole reciver indicates this is not an AK-101. So the answer could be this is rechambered AKS (AKS-47)
@InRUSSIAweTRUST Did you know that in 1974, Russia updated the AK-47, which used the 7.62x39 cartridge? The new rifle is called the AK-74, and chambers the 5.45x39 cartridge, which fires a smaller bullet at a higher velocity, with greater accuracy. There's a reason that every military that can afford to do so, abandons the 47 and its archaic, ineffective cartridge, despite how many civilians think it has great "stopping power".
One of the main m16 designer said himself that he'd rather see his son, serving in iraq, use a ak-47. Just the sole idea of having all marksman infantry with optics is scary. Walking man can't aim. Let along a running one. Truth is, they just too stuburn and greedy to admit the m16 is beated. The 7.62 and 5.45 ammo have both been proven more effective in every field. The 5.45x39 is a SCARY ammo, Ask the troops who saw brothers fall to it. It was designed to be a 1 shot kill "magic bullet".
@Tiger66261 no, the an 94 wont replace the aks , an 94 got many bad things, its expensive and the government is poor lately, not as reliable than the ak series due to the complicated mechanism , the two shot burst is excellent but it needs specialist practice which is not for the army, so the an 94 is for special force but not for the army
every time there is a revolutionary weaponry breakthrough guns are copied. for example: the mauser 98. almost all modern bolt actions originated from it. the m1 garand is the forefather for many semi and full autos today. and there are so many versions of ak-47s because almost all middle east, asia and eastern european countries want the gun but dont wana pay to make it
@USBtwoPointOh True and well said, but they do share the same heritage and basic design principles. Not to mention the unmentioned AN-94 rival the AEK-971 which is a a direct decedent of the AK-74. Just more rifles that are more then a match for our old M-16 based weapon systems is all.
I agree wit you that it's not an Ak-101, but Russia made Ak-101 and 102 are the export model of Ak-74m, and they fire 5.56x45mm NATO. Ak-103 and Ak104 are the Russian standard and fire 7.62x39 Russian. (Ak-105 is same as Ak-104 but fires the traditonal ak-74m cartridge 5.45x39)
look, an ak-101 is made by the same company that made the ak 47 and 74, the ak-101 variant is basically an ak-74M, the only difference beween the ak-74m and the ak-101 is that the ak-74m chambers the russian 5.45mm round, while the ak-101 chambers the NATO 5.56mm round.
That is NOT AK101! I hav owned several 101's and this definitely is not 101. If I had to guess, I'd say it is an underfolder version of Bulgarian Arsenal. (Which also has a milled receiver and also a stock exactly like that is available)
@RedFang4 like i said, if it was ww1 then he would be over 100 years old. he was wonded around 20 years old.and that happend during ww2. because it ww2 the russians needed automatic weapons.
Spetznaz is well known to use Ak-103 and 104. Their methods of engagment bring them closer to the enemy then regular army, they prefer the extra stopping power Russian intermediate .308 provides.
IDK where you got the last bit of info at but the 5.45 is actually ballistically inferior to a 62 or 63 grain 5.56. As of now, I'm pretty sure almost all the AK's in the middle east are chambered in x39.
@RoadRageKen Oh absolutely, i dont mean to bag on the guy, cuz it IS a good idea to check for jams etc (even if its not completely necessary). Im just bagging on the M16/ M4 :)
SethFarrier and paintballa175: If 5,56 ammo is in your eyes bb gun ammo, then what was the point for Russians to make even smaller ammuniton(5.45x39 mm) for their guns, noobs.
Well, maybe I took it kind of hard, but the rate of fire is kind of average for an assault rifle. 600 round a minnute. not too high not to low. The ak series has low-medium rate of fire.
@7Grendel7 Yeah it does fire a NATO round and not 7.62 - I think they would rather would have a bunch of guys try to save the wounded ass then just leave him as dead
AK-74M is AK-101 with 5.45mm rounds. Doesnt look different, doesnt work different, doesnt feal different. Same thing with only to fit Russian ammo. 74 comes before 101 btw.
@reddwarf50 yeah, but its very large, large means weight, and you dont want alot of weight. you can probably hold 3 50 rds mags for AK and youll be good (:
@Ediadelor LOOOOOOOOL The first M4s were used during the Vietnam War? It was first made in 1994, and it was first in service in 1997. Vietnam ended in 1975.
that shit that this guy fired seems more an u.s. made ak47 without licence of copyright, because of this mag failure. Russian weapons are just another standard .
ur first thought was right gun russian weapons dont fire 5.56 nato rounds for a ak it either 7.62x39,5.45x39 or the big boy of the group my fav 7.62x54
No, the Ak74 uses the 5.45 rounds, this is the Ak-101 (export version of Ak-74m) which uses the 5.56 NATO rounds, its Ok everybody makes mistakes buddy.
0:01 someone has a bad case of diarrhea
Look at the impressive control. That was some accurate auto fire.
This weapon ROCKS
it was beated as soon as the m16 came out bcause youve got to remember that kalashinikov built it before the m16
No the SVD wasn't designed by Kalashnikov, it was designed by some other person (forgot his name) using his own design. Though some parts were taken from the AK platform, such as the safety and some of the trigger group, it's still a very different gun.
The SVD has a milled receiver, the action is a completely different beast, and there are many other changes to allow the gun to fire the 7.62x54R round accurately.
5.56x45 NATO
Now there are ak -102, 103, 104 ,105's
all using diffrent types of rounds including the oldschool 7.62x39mm.
@141235a I already said it is better in terms of damage. But the AK variants, no matter how much you attempt to upgrade it, will never reach the range/accuracy of american rifles (or any other modern, high end rifles.)
Note: he cleared the weapon a second time...
Lol, I was watching this vid and thinking the range looked really familiar and then I realized it was West Point which is where I go to school.
@hemek
I think it also fires the 5.45 instead of the 7.62. I'm not sure though, I might be wrong.
@pavel280488AA Thats a new model of AK the AK 101 - its basically plastic but still has the mechanics of the 47 with less weight - Really cool weapon - can't wait to try one out properly :D
@BigBossIvan How so? I just said russians are planning to replace the outdated AK series with the AN-94, which is a huge improvement.
However, I cannot argue with somone who says "At most engagement distances modern AK's are far more than accurate enough to do the job"
Really, just no.
@BigBossIvan Sorry, dude, but AN-94 is a completely different system. The only thing it has in common with AK is the round it fires.
I thought it was use the same ammo like AK-74M, thanx for the info.
All I'm missing is an AK chambered for 7.62NATO
@XplosiveProductZ AK101 is 5,56x45 nato round velocity is about 3000 ft per second, a lot more accurate than the 47.. AK47 is 7,62x39 (muzzle velocity is about 2300 ft per second, more killing power, less accurate)
If your going for an AK, Buy Russian, not cheap knockoffs.
the mp44 was the first assualt rifle, the ak47 was a modification from that. So please reply more about how your right and i am some how wrong. Google is your friend :)
you know that the AK-101 is russian made right? its just a newer version.
i have one thing to say to that... TACTICAL FACEPALM
"More old."
@BigBossIvan i am from serbia and the yugo ak is a serbia yugoslavia doesnt exist eny more the "yugo" ak witch is manufactured in kragujevac serbia by zastava is caled m70 and it is not compleatly the same as an ak
THe AK-101 is a great weapon. However, the AN-94 is a better weapon thats why Spetsnaz is issued the 94. But the 101 and 103 are great weapons
its modernized AKMS, not AK-101.
Поверьте мне этот АК не сделан в России,судя по магазину АК сделан под НАТО патрон.А в армии у меня был АК-74 5.45мм ни одной задержки за 2 года службы на Севере!!!Я границу охранял!!!
why does it sound so quiet?
How do you figure?
not the AK101 unless they modified it.
in soviet russia gun shoots you
Nope. Gun here is 5.56x45. Look at magazine.
someone explain why this chubby-face would be officer have to laugh. He's good to shoot new SNAFU cartoons,I guess.
i like
It's funny how you accuse him of being a "COD4 expert" while using the word "noob". Why don't you both challenge each other to a video game duel, and the AK 101 fires a 5.56 round.
@ScatTheGat here in America gun shoots badguys:D
xm8 is still the best weapon like all hk wapons =P
Russia sells out-of-date samples copies of other countries all rest without observance of "know-how" as a rule such weapon is lowered on fighting qualities many times over
@XplosiveProductZ this is specialy made by bulgaria
@reddwarf50 that is a bannana clip. i actaully have a clip for my ak that holds 50 rounds! takes forever to fuckin load lol. a WHOLE BOX
haha, another COD4 expert.
you just took what i said and reworded it.
This gun for NATO solders in IRAQ and SF in Afganistan.
hehe looked so easy for him
no gun is...
pretty neat seeing an AK101 with a folding stock, normally I'm use to seeing them with a sidefolder or solid stock nice vid.
@blobguy1212 Oh please,Everyone knows the AK has better Reliability and damage, but everyone ALSO knows the american rifles have better Accuracy and range.
Just shut up, even if the AK is better, americans still have access to it.
The picture of an AK101 I'm looking at right now (wikipedia) shows a smooth receiver right above the mag well, but in the vid it has the longer depression above it like those with milled receivers. Maybe the Army's upgrading its OpFor weapons with plastic furniture?
Hmmm, an impressive shoot day at one of America's most well known Military Academies. AWESOME!!
The caliber for the AK-101 is the same as the Ak-74, right?
@blobguy1212 Not all battlefields are Swamp/Muddy conditions. In wide open spaces and urban enviroments, the M16 is a better choice.
Also, The M16 is far more reliable then it was during Veitnam, and that is somthing that many AK fanboys dont touch on. Just beacuse the AK is like 99.9 reliable, doesnt mean the American weapons of today are horrible unreliable, they are actually pretty good in terms of reliabilty.
@blobguy1212 The AK still has horrible accuracy and range, somthing which I dispise of.
I have already admitted the AK is like 99.9% reliable, but to me, thats the only real strength (and its cheapness). Stuff like Recoil, Accuracy, Range, weight, and iron sights are all very poor on the AK-47.
umm that has a milled receiver so its no AK-101
It that for a deer wearing spectacles shoots from АК? Is he the American soldier? He does not know as correctly to discharge the weapon. At first the empty shop is cleaned. The shutter is then cocked and control descent is made. At us in Russian army it would receive from the officer a kick on a nape for it)))
the first ak47 was built in 1934 on designs of the german m944. He was a tank gunner and wounded during ww1, while he was healign he made the first ak47, its was a very ugly gun, but it had modifications to it,
What? I never talked about hitler here except for him banning the STG44 in ww2 because of its uglyness.
AK-47, RPK, AKM, AKMS, AK-74, AK-101, AK-103, AK-104, AK-107, AK-108 etc.
@BigBossIvan so you are saying that all russian weapons manufactured by izhsmash are kalashnikov rifles? even its the rifle was designed by Gennady Nikonov and uses a totally diferent mechanism? do you really know why there is a family of kalashnikov weapons all based in the original AK-47 design and why are they called "kalishnikov", let me tell you something AN-94 its not a kalashnikov rifle at all. mihail kalashnikov and their designs didnt inspired this weapon at all.
@Tiger66261
your talking as if the m-16 has improved and everyone still uses AK-47. the AK has also improved becoming much more accurate then it used to be. american weapons are not horribly unrliable, but they do jam, or stop working, maybe it started raining, maybe you had to swim across a river. but i know that i can rely on an ak no matter what weather or any conditions are.
That is not AK-101 that is a Bulgarian knock-off called SA M-5... It has milled receiver (Ak-101 is stamped), is an underfolder (AK-101 is a sidefolder), and has a wrong compensator...
It's not AK-101.
AK clone?
@HunterBeier it doesn't really matter. some soldiers also wear ACU with DCU, or Desert ONLY uniform with ACU equipment.
@blobguy1212 Well, The only new version I would give credit to is the AK 103/104, only beacuse it is the only real AK that can use a large variety of attachments. But even then, they are still found with a large lack of accuracy and range compared to real modern Rifles of today (the AK 103/104 is really just a AK-74 with better materials.)
Due to the inadequate accuracy and range of the AK series, the russians needed to replace the AK with the AN-94, and that is enough proof.
@Tiger66261 Clearly you've never seen or heard of the AN-94 Abakan rifle then... But I digress, in my experience I have been appalled by how much our American M16 weapons system jams from the range, to training, to it's almost 20% rate of failure in combat (thankfully never saw the last one).... At most engagement distances modern AK's are far more than accurate enough to do the job and having a rifle that does not jam is the difference between life and death.
personally, as an american, i prefer an adopting of an ak in the standard nato round. i think one already exists, i think it is the ak101 but im not positive. we can just modify it with a picatinny rail on top for sights and it would still be cheaper than an ar15/m16 style weapon, or maybe adopt the finnish valmet that is said to be the most accurate AK variant in widespread service.
This weapon is a misterious shit. You can see by looking at the reciver that this is AKS reciver, not AKM/AKMS) or AK-74/AKS-74 (AKS-47 for those who think such a weapon exists). AK-101 is basically AK-74M chambered in 5.56 x 45. It uses magazines curved like this one. However this stock and whole reciver indicates this is not an AK-101. So the answer could be this is rechambered AKS (AKS-47)
@InRUSSIAweTRUST
Did you know that in 1974, Russia updated the AK-47, which used the 7.62x39 cartridge? The new rifle is called the AK-74, and chambers the 5.45x39 cartridge, which fires a smaller bullet at a higher velocity, with greater accuracy. There's a reason that every military that can afford to do so, abandons the 47 and its archaic, ineffective cartridge, despite how many civilians think it has great "stopping power".
One of the main m16 designer said himself that he'd rather see his son, serving in iraq, use a ak-47.
Just the sole idea of having all marksman infantry with optics is scary.
Walking man can't aim. Let along a running one.
Truth is, they just too stuburn and greedy to admit the m16 is beated.
The 7.62 and 5.45 ammo have both been proven more effective in every field. The 5.45x39 is a SCARY ammo, Ask the troops who saw brothers fall to it. It was designed to be a 1 shot kill "magic bullet".
it's not Ak-101. Where muzzle break?
Maybe Ak-103?
@Tiger66261 no, the an 94 wont replace the aks , an 94 got many bad things, its expensive and the government is poor lately, not as reliable than the ak series due to the complicated mechanism , the two shot burst is excellent but it needs specialist practice which is not for the army, so the an 94 is for special force but not for the army
every time there is a revolutionary weaponry breakthrough guns are copied. for example: the mauser 98. almost all modern bolt actions originated from it. the m1 garand is the forefather for many semi and full autos today. and there are so many versions of ak-47s because almost all middle east, asia and eastern european countries want the gun but dont wana pay to make it
@USBtwoPointOh True and well said, but they do share the same heritage and basic design principles. Not to mention the unmentioned AN-94 rival the AEK-971 which is a a direct decedent of the AK-74. Just more rifles that are more then a match for our old M-16 based weapon systems is all.
I agree wit you that it's not an Ak-101, but Russia made Ak-101 and 102 are the export model of Ak-74m, and they fire 5.56x45mm NATO.
Ak-103 and Ak104 are the Russian standard and fire 7.62x39 Russian. (Ak-105 is same as Ak-104 but fires the traditonal ak-74m cartridge 5.45x39)
look, an ak-101 is made by the same company that made the ak 47 and 74, the ak-101 variant is basically an ak-74M, the only difference beween the ak-74m and the ak-101 is that the ak-74m chambers the russian 5.45mm round, while the ak-101 chambers the NATO 5.56mm round.
That is NOT AK101! I hav owned several 101's and this definitely is not 101.
If I had to guess, I'd say it is an underfolder version of Bulgarian Arsenal. (Which also has a milled receiver and also a stock exactly like that is available)
@SymAmineC8H11N
they dont want to admit that the russians built a better weapon then them
@RedFang4 like i said, if it was ww1 then he would be over 100 years old. he was wonded around 20 years old.and that happend during ww2. because it ww2 the russians needed automatic weapons.
Spetznaz is well known to use Ak-103 and 104.
Their methods of engagment bring them closer to the enemy then regular army, they prefer the extra stopping power Russian intermediate .308 provides.
IDK where you got the last bit of info at but the 5.45 is actually ballistically inferior to a 62 or 63 grain 5.56. As of now, I'm pretty sure almost all the AK's in the middle east are chambered in x39.
@RoadRageKen Oh absolutely, i dont mean to bag on the guy, cuz it IS a good idea to check for jams etc (even if its not completely necessary). Im just bagging on the M16/ M4 :)
SethFarrier and paintballa175: If 5,56 ammo is in your eyes bb gun ammo, then what was the point for Russians to make even smaller ammuniton(5.45x39 mm) for their guns, noobs.
Well, maybe I took it kind of hard, but the rate of fire is kind of average for an assault rifle. 600 round a minnute. not too high not to low. The ak series has low-medium rate of fire.
@7Grendel7 Yeah it does fire a NATO round and not 7.62 - I think they would rather would have a bunch of guys try to save the wounded ass then just leave him as dead
AK-74M is AK-101 with 5.45mm rounds. Doesnt look different, doesnt work different, doesnt feal different. Same thing with only to fit Russian ammo. 74 comes before 101 btw.
@reddwarf50 yeah, but its very large, large means weight, and you dont want alot of weight. you can probably hold 3 50 rds mags for AK and youll be good (:
@Ediadelor LOOOOOOOOL The first M4s were used during the Vietnam War? It was first made in 1994, and it was first in service in 1997. Vietnam ended in 1975.
that shit that this guy fired seems more an u.s. made ak47 without licence of copyright, because of this mag failure.
Russian weapons are just another standard .
Errr, you mean CAR-15´s? those where the closest weapons to resemble an m4 during the vietnam war, the m4 carbines were made at 1980 i think... :P
The thing about the AN-94 is it costs to much to be mass produced, although it has been issued to select task forces in the Russian army and spetznaz.
ur first thought was right gun russian weapons dont fire 5.56 nato rounds for a ak it either 7.62x39,5.45x39 or the big boy of the group my fav 7.62x54
No, the Ak74 uses the 5.45 rounds, this is the Ak-101 (export version of Ak-74m) which uses the 5.56 NATO rounds, its Ok everybody makes mistakes buddy.
@afrofin1 LOL, actually the ak-101 uses the american 5.56x45mm bullets, I'm guessing thats the reason why an american officer is trying it.
they... well I found they are made cheaper and less accurate... no I mean compared to a European Com block AK they make them look bad...
true but then again the same could be said about any legendary product out there needless to say the AK is in high demand around the world.
Not Ak-101.
Look at the muzzle, that's an old 47 remake, or replica i should say.
Find some real pictures of Ak-101 you'll see.
It just doesn't have a standard flash eliminator.
It fooled me till I looked closley, the magazine is what gives it away.
Yeah, this isn't an AK-101, it doesn't have the Russian designed flash eliminator that all the new AK models have now.
LOL He checked for a jam cuz usually when his M16 stops shooting its cuz of a jam
silly american AKs dont jam (:
They use all the AK variants except the AK 47 it's just that the AK 74 is in far greater numbers than the others.
@RedFang4 he was wonded during ww2 not ww1. he wouldent be alive by now if he would disine it during ww1 :P.
Its not exactly the same size round as NATO 5.56mm though is it? Isn't it 5.45 or something? Does that matter?
@BigBossIvan I think you guys are mistaken. Arkangel419 was probably meaning the M16, not the M4 carbine.
Just to let you know.
I'm gonna assume that it is a Romanian WASR-10, in a vauge sence it could be called an Ak-47 clone.
Yeah thats deffinetely NOT AK 101. The AK 101 looks almost identical to AK 74M, exect in 5.56 NATO.