i don't understand why would you shoot in f5.6 for portraits? that's the reason you got less bokeh in fuji. You have come down to 2.8 to get proper bokeh and portrait shot.
Ever heard of something called an "environmental portrait", start learning maybe you will understand more and real professionals shoot portraits in a studio with lighting where you can hammer an f8 and get even the hair's on the face sharp.
>We changed to f5.2 for more DoF >Also in the image comparison keeps saying how Fuji has less bokeh Brother, if you're shooting portraits @ 28mm w/ APSC, it's criminal to drop from f2 to f5.2 Calling this a professional camera is an absolute crime lmfao. It's a FIXED lens compact camera.. Also why do you keep saying "looks more detailed" without cropping in, I guarantee every shot on the fuji has tons more detail. If you're already trying to "match" the pictures with DoF, why not actually compare the images closer. *And can you please do some other shots other than pictures of yourself jesus christ*
I have an iPhone and a 24mp dslr. I send pics from the dslr to my phone and when I compare them to the ones I take with my phone, the results are interesting. 1. Biggest takeaway- for casual snaps of people, the iPhone is much more reliable at getting shots that look good. 2. The best shots from the dslr are better than the best iPhone camera shots. But generally the iPhone produces a larger percentage of keepers. 3. For things the phone camera CAN do well, it may actually be the better choice. It’s the camera I always have with me, it’s always on and ready to go, and people are not intimidated by it. 4. Major things the phone camera cannot do well are sports, birds, anything needing long focal lengths, stopping motion, blurring backgrounds.
Suggestion: sample photos are too small to watch on a phone, though bigger screen wouldn’t be a problem. Make it a little zoom in if you’re comparing on something particular like for example: a missed edge detection on a portrait mode or a detail comparison between two photos. Great content though!
Good comparison. It's subtle but you can also see how the iPhone distorts facial features as well, making people look a little different than in real life. For example 8:57.
The real comparison is between sensor size and pixel density. The fact that an iPhone can come anywhere near an APSc sized sensor is a computational marvel.
I tried a whole bunch of Android smartphones this year hoping to find something that would make me switch back to Android, even though I am 100% in the Apple ecosystem (iPhone, Mac mini, iPad). The only one I found that could replace my iPhone is the Pixel 8 Pro. I didn’t encounter the same issues I usually find with Android smartphones. The voice command works perfectly (unlike other Android devices where, for some reason, I can never get the voice command to work on the Gboard keyboard). Additionally, when setting up a new phone, you can have an exact copy of your old Pixel, just like you can with a new iPhone. This isn’t the case with Samsung, etc., where you end up having to put all the apps back into folders yourself, reorganize everything, etc. In the end, I found that the photo and video quality were not as good as on the iPhone, so I kept my iPhone 15 Pro Max and returned the Pixel. However, I’m still looking forward to seeing the Pixel 9 Pro XL. I would be very happy to see Google reclaim its crown as the king of photography. They have the resources and talent; I don’t know what’s missing for them to achieve it. Having a disability, voice command allows me to write very quickly without exhausting myself, so it’s indispensable for me. Additionally, I don’t understand why, when copying data from an old Android smartphone to a new one, you don’t get an exact copy of what you had on the old one. You have to reorganize everything, redo your folders from scratch, etc. This is a basic feature, and Android is advanced enough to have this functionality. I will never understand this.
If you shoot in RAW, you do realize that with about two clicks (or maybe even just one), you can create a completely similar exposure on the Fuji as on the iPhone, right? You can adjust the white balance wherever you want. It’s pointless to talk about color differences when comparing RAW photos…
I don't think realize that film sims have different outcomes based on lighting and colors. Also where the face appears darker, I doubt they under exposed and post editing in LR...As someone pointed out, why shooting f5.6 and not f2.8? Also, the raw photos don't look edited to match or even adjust white balance.
I can tell you put in a lot of hard work into your videos. Much respect to you and thank you for quality videos/entertainment/in depth information to details. Incredible!!!!👏💪
For photos that were taken in low light conditions, I find that photos from APSC/full frame cameras hold up better and the gap in image quality is more obvious when the photos are displayed on large screens. The screens at the back of cameras and screens on cellphones are quite deceiving, because of the smaller screen size.
I think the Fujifilm X100VI is not a professional camera. Yes, the price is relatively high for a fixed lens APSC camera, it has professional specs and features, but it aims toward more casual users who want something to carry around all day every day, and want a camera that has the look and feel of a film camera with digital capabilities. Also, why do you shoot portraits at f5.2 on the Fuji, whereas the blur effect on the iPhone looks like fake f2 ?
X100VI is the definition of a professional camera...pros use it as a secondary body for street/travel/documentary/reportage etc. It is the best for what it is (or Ricoh). Not everything is product/portrait/wedding photography... For amateurs, i consider it a waste to get x100VI as an only camera. Just get something like X-T20 (30, 50) and a pancake lens and you get the same thing but more versitile.
Both the s24 ultra and the Fuji is basically same with oversaturating, overexposing and oversharpening issues. The photos look really cartoonish just like on my s24 ultra. I have a sony A7 IV full frame mirrorless and the shots looks almost like iPhone. More realistic, more consistent and more details. I almost mixup the shots of iPhone and sony cuz of their identical results. I even saw one video where iPhone almost looks same as the sony but due to iPhone having a slight issue in edge detection, it was easily identified. I must say this girl is kinda biased
Artificial scarcity. Fujifilm is now following the hermes,supreme, stanley cup, marketing strategy. Poor people fight over it on ebay while the rich just buys a Leica.
@@obasekiraphael Have a look at the images yourself lol. No phone has still matched the texture and detail processing of it and just the overall detail and quality (except others that also use the same sensor like mi 10s/10/mix4 but they still fall behind). It's 27MP natively. It's default images are as detailed as samsung's "200MP" mode (which btw, since these are multi-bayer sensors, they never look like the actual MP it's stating).
Thanks for the comparison. I used a Pixel 6 on a recent trip along with a Fuji X100f and I was very impressed by the Pixel 6 images I was able to share with digital projection at my camera club. So I bought a Pixel 8 Pro that has much more capability with three lenses with 48 or 50 megapixels and raw options. And better skin color than the iPhone, which I thought was a weakness in the images in this video.. For the most part for my use, goodby X100f!
The iPhone is the standard bro. It doesn’t imply it’s better but it has certainly set itself as the standard, it’s like the US Dollar, if you’re measuring the strength of an any currency, you’re most likely going to measure it against the dollar, and that’s just the way it is bro.
@@mjkim0709 ya it’s laughable bro 😂😂, but this what happens when a product dominates in popularity, you can’t do a comparison test without the iPhone being there despite it not being the best anymore
Reject the negative comments. This was a good comparison for people considering the X100VI when so many own iPhones. Bottom line, iPhone video utterly destroys the X100VI. The photos are close, but here again, the iPhone produces excellent photos which are excellent for 99% of consumers. Difficult to justify $1600+ for a camera when the iPhone on your hip/pocket can do it all, especially video, at a lower price.
Title is hilariously misleading. The Fujifilm X100VI is not a professional camera. It is a hobbyist camera. No professional photographer is shooting weddings or magazine shoots with the X100VI.
Why would you stop the Fuji down to f5.6 for a portrait comparison with the iPhone in portrait mode creating fake bokeh then you comment that the iPhone has more bokeh? Shoot the Fuji wide open to create a narrow depth of field like the iPhone is faking. Your comparison in this section is stupid.
iPhone can be setup to get what you are looking for. there are so many pre filters and also post processing. Looking at this, I cancelled the Fuji order. So much hype for nothing
Based on your video, I kind of feel like a 2nd camera is not entirely worth it - it just seems to be more trading blows rather than a definitive, you need both. Question 1: Do you feel that adding some additional TLC/manual processing to iphone photos improves them to a point where it further closes the gaps between cameras? I'm novice photographer but most of what I do now is somewhat casual - I do a lot of clouds, nature photos and some nature macro. Now I do know cameras for macro will definitely win, question 2: but are there any other scenarios above that you think it would be essential for me to have a higher end camera? I was looking to upgrade my phone soon, but as an alternative, I was considering getting a high end camera, as the #1 reason for my upgrade is an improved camera, so any advice is appreciated.
For photo take: - Vivo X100 Ultra - Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Huawei Pura 70 Ultra ANY of those phones is better than latest iPhone. 😉 For video it's more debatable, but if you ask me, iPhone lost it's crown there also. 🤔
This Fuji is not even an interchangeable less camera. This is not a professional camera but a hobbyist camera. If at least you used a Fuji xt5 or something
le X100VI a le meme capteur et le meme processeur que le X-T5 ! .... et l'iPhone n'a pas d'objectif interchangeable. Donc achetez vous un cerveau pour mieux comprendre...
Hmm, I have some doubts that iPhone is that washed out. Computational is designed and supposed to correct it. I have a Sony a6700, that I compare everyday with the iPhone. Both have strengths and weaknesses, but iPhone comes out first most of the situations. Iphone can be set to HEIF Max for sharper details.
The Fuji colors are way better. That`s all i can see in this video because sharpness and artistic rendering are too low res to be noticed. Oh, the depth of field effect is also way better on Fuji.
That is actually impressive how bad at photography can you be and still make a content about cameras. A professional camera has a lot bigger sensor and better optics than any phone so in right hands photos from a camera would be 10 times better. What is the point of taking portrait shots at around f5.6 and then saying that iphone has more "bokeh", no shit, maybe open your aperture to at least f2.8 or even f2 ? And those overexposed clouds...
So... million people are just dumb for buying 2000 euros cameras+2000euros lens. The solution it's an iPhone. Try to zoom a little bit and after doing, return here to comment the results with us. That's no serious.
In general, whether it's iPhone or Samsung, new phones take great photos, but only as a phone. comparing photos taken with a phone to a Fuji is like comparing shit to cottage cheese with honey. If you don't believe it, take a photo with your iPhone and Fuji and watch it on a 60" TV. Fuji, having 24mpx, consumes every phone in terms of quality and sharpness. Besides, most cameras from even 15 years ago outperform modern phones in terms of photo quality, and that is beyond dispute.
The x100vi is not a phone but this comparison is made as if you were comparing two phone cameras, pointless and misleading. The advantages you get with a dedicated camera and comparatively huge sensor is ignored completely.
Can't really see true differences on on screen side by sides. Certainly better on the TV vs phone , but such limited size. Having had a Fujifilm XT1 for a long time now, there's simply zero comparison vs GFs iPhone 14 Pro when I output some wall prints at work. The relentless bad white balance and yellow hue seems go continue into the 15.
On a small screen for sure, try making large prints or zooming in and you can easily see the difference, any phone picture falls apart quickly and turns mushy. You can try downloading some sample pictures and compare.
@@dsego84 ok. Yeah that is true. But most ppl will view it on a smartphone and compression on social media will likely make everything look the same 🥲🥲
Just got offered a X100vi. I used to take a lot of pictures, but now I'm mainly using an (older) iPhone. I dunno if I'm going to use the camera that much... Is the demand still v. strong?
It still wouldn’t match the Fuji. When you blow up the pictures on a bigger display like a laptop or TV set, the iPhone shortcomings will be immediately apparent. On a tiny phone display, people are fooled into thinking that they’re comparable.
It's the sensor size, aps-c vs 1/2.5", it's physics, larger sensors, bigger glass. If it was that simple to compete, they would've done it, people spend serious money on big lenses and big sensors.
@@dsego84 a huge medium format ccd sensor would lose to a tiny modern iphone camera matrix in RAW so it's not all about the size. But where iphones and most other phones really fall behind cameras is in optics, it's literally plastic lenses with some poor anti reflection coating.
Stop compare iPhone with Camera Digital. Phone nature is for call & Camera for photography. Don't try to produce useless content like that for gain profit and sponsor.
i don't understand why would you shoot in f5.6 for portraits? that's the reason you got less bokeh in fuji. You have come down to 2.8 to get proper bokeh and portrait shot.
clowns
Agreed. Carrying a camera with no knowledge of how to use it
also not using Eterna for videos or mentioning the ability to tune shadows, highlights, clarity for a more smartphone-y look.
I was about to say the same thing!!! Shooting f5.6 and expecting proper bokeh, what a joke hahaha
Ever heard of something called an "environmental portrait", start learning maybe you will understand more and real professionals shoot portraits in a studio with lighting where you can hammer an f8 and get even the hair's on the face sharp.
Aperture to 5.2, for portraits? In order to achieve higher depth of field, why? And then wonder why the bokeh is more prominent on the phone.
I suggest you add 100% crops to your photo comparison. Otherwise it’s very difficult to get the difference
especially considering it's a youtube video with horrendous compression not to mention their own video's compression
This video comparison is criminal
Why exactly did you shoot the Fuji at 5.6 for portraits? And then go on to say that the bokeh looks better on the iPhone???????? Madness.
>We changed to f5.2 for more DoF
>Also in the image comparison keeps saying how Fuji has less bokeh
Brother, if you're shooting portraits @ 28mm w/ APSC, it's criminal to drop from f2 to f5.2
Calling this a professional camera is an absolute crime lmfao. It's a FIXED lens compact camera..
Also why do you keep saying "looks more detailed" without cropping in, I guarantee every shot on the fuji has tons more detail. If you're already trying to "match" the pictures with DoF, why not actually compare the images closer.
*And can you please do some other shots other than pictures of yourself jesus christ*
Would love to see this done again with the Xiaomi 14 ultra, Vivo X100 pro and S24 Ultra!
Will be much delighted 😊
She is a fan of the iPhone and has an unbiased attitude towards other manufacturers.
Only xiaomi
A curious question: Are there people over eighty years of age who are very elderly people who own modern smart phones???
And Oppo Find X7 Ultra! The newest huawei would also be good.
I have an iPhone and a 24mp dslr. I send pics from the dslr to my phone and when I compare them to the ones I take with my phone, the results are interesting. 1. Biggest takeaway- for casual snaps of people, the iPhone is much more reliable at getting shots that look good. 2. The best shots from the dslr are better than the best iPhone camera shots. But generally the iPhone produces a larger percentage of keepers. 3. For things the phone camera CAN do well, it may actually be the better choice. It’s the camera I always have with me, it’s always on and ready to go, and people are not intimidated by it. 4. Major things the phone camera cannot do well are sports, birds, anything needing long focal lengths, stopping motion, blurring backgrounds.
Suggestion: sample photos are too small to watch on a phone, though bigger screen wouldn’t be a problem. Make it a little zoom in if you’re comparing on something particular like for example: a missed edge detection on a portrait mode or a detail comparison between two photos. Great content though!
Good comparison. It's subtle but you can also see how the iPhone distorts facial features as well, making people look a little different than in real life. For example 8:57.
The sky captured by the iPhone always looks like it's about to rain because of how dark it appears in the photo. 🤷♂️
The real comparison is between sensor size and pixel density. The fact that an iPhone can come anywhere near an APSc sized sensor is a computational marvel.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is almost as good as a $30000 camera
Dudes...
AI photo 😂
If the iPhone just had the Fuji film simulations, I would cancel my preorder
film simulations = filters.
Should have compared it to xiaomi 14 ultra
Vivo ultra
I tried a whole bunch of Android smartphones this year hoping to find something that would make me switch back to Android, even though I am 100% in the Apple ecosystem (iPhone, Mac mini, iPad).
The only one I found that could replace my iPhone is the Pixel 8 Pro. I didn’t encounter the same issues I usually find with Android smartphones. The voice command works perfectly (unlike other Android devices where, for some reason, I can never get the voice command to work on the Gboard keyboard). Additionally, when setting up a new phone, you can have an exact copy of your old Pixel, just like you can with a new iPhone.
This isn’t the case with Samsung, etc., where you end up having to put all the apps back into folders yourself, reorganize everything, etc.
In the end, I found that the photo and video quality were not as good as on the iPhone, so I kept my iPhone 15 Pro Max and returned the Pixel. However, I’m still looking forward to seeing the Pixel 9 Pro XL. I would be very happy to see Google reclaim its crown as the king of photography.
They have the resources and talent; I don’t know what’s missing for them to achieve it.
Having a disability, voice command allows me to write very quickly without exhausting myself, so it’s indispensable for me. Additionally, I don’t understand why, when copying data from an old Android smartphone to a new one, you don’t get an exact copy of what you had on the old one. You have to reorganize everything, redo your folders from scratch, etc. This is a basic feature, and Android is advanced enough to have this functionality. I will never understand this.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Xiaomi 14 Ultra,Vivo X 100 pro easily beat the iphone 15 pro max😎
@@ricianobommel4298 I believe you didn't even read my comment before responding...
If you shoot in RAW, you do realize that with about two clicks (or maybe even just one), you can create a completely similar exposure on the Fuji as on the iPhone, right? You can adjust the white balance wherever you want. It’s pointless to talk about color differences when comparing RAW photos…
id still pick the x100vi
over all better quality photos and videos
performs well at night too
It's obvious that there are significantly better phones to compare with better features, but you chose to do it with the iPhone.
because the uninformed masses think iPhones take best pictures. Also, majority of Americans use iPhones so it generates clicks.
I don't think realize that film sims have different outcomes based on lighting and colors. Also where the face appears darker, I doubt they under exposed and post editing in LR...As someone pointed out, why shooting f5.6 and not f2.8? Also, the raw photos don't look edited to match or even adjust white balance.
I can tell you put in a lot of hard work into your videos. Much respect to you and thank you for quality videos/entertainment/in depth information to details. Incredible!!!!👏💪
Great comparison, thanks !
For photos that were taken in low light conditions, I find that photos from APSC/full frame cameras hold up better and the gap in image quality is more obvious when the photos are displayed on large screens. The screens at the back of cameras and screens on cellphones are quite deceiving, because of the smaller screen size.
I think the Fujifilm X100VI is not a professional camera. Yes, the price is relatively high for a fixed lens APSC camera, it has professional specs and features, but it aims toward more casual users who want something to carry around all day every day, and want a camera that has the look and feel of a film camera with digital capabilities. Also, why do you shoot portraits at f5.2 on the Fuji, whereas the blur effect on the iPhone looks like fake f2 ?
X100VI is the definition of a professional camera...pros use it as a secondary body for street/travel/documentary/reportage etc. It is the best for what it is (or Ricoh).
Not everything is product/portrait/wedding photography...
For amateurs, i consider it a waste to get x100VI as an only camera.
Just get something like X-T20 (30, 50) and a pancake lens and you get the same thing but more versitile.
Why does the Fujifilm camera seem like shot on Samsung S24 Ultra🤔🤔
Samsung is more dull
@@r.k.lalnunzira I understand that, but see the pink hue, over sharpening etc. It's very similar to S24ultra
You say the image quality is as good as on the Fuji and Samsung
No
Both the s24 ultra and the Fuji is basically same with oversaturating, overexposing and oversharpening issues. The photos look really cartoonish just like on my s24 ultra. I have a sony A7 IV full frame mirrorless and the shots looks almost like iPhone. More realistic, more consistent and more details. I almost mixup the shots of iPhone and sony cuz of their identical results. I even saw one video where iPhone almost looks same as the sony but due to iPhone having a slight issue in edge detection, it was easily identified. I must say this girl is kinda biased
Must be hard getting the Fuji considering how quite rare it is now. Even when it's only recently launched.
Artificial scarcity. Fujifilm is now following the hermes,supreme, stanley cup, marketing strategy. Poor people fight over it on ebay while the rich just buys a Leica.
looking at the fujis results, I'd say it's closer to what an s24 ultra would have.
no phone captures images similar to an actual camera, closest being shooting RAW with a Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
@@notlahaanbro stop yapping nonsense….that’s almost the result the s24ultra always bring…natural
@@obasekiraphael Have a look at the images yourself lol. No phone has still matched the texture and detail processing of it and just the overall detail and quality (except others that also use the same sensor like mi 10s/10/mix4 but they still fall behind). It's 27MP natively. It's default images are as detailed as samsung's "200MP" mode (which btw, since these are multi-bayer sensors, they never look like the actual MP it's stating).
@@notlahaan Do not waste time, they never had a camera before.
It is stunning to see that the iPhone can be compatible , with the Fujii. This is an amazing video 🔥👌
Wow, what a video! To the point, concise, informational and exactly what most people would be interested in when it comes to this camera. 😊
Thanks for the comparison. I used a Pixel 6 on a recent trip along with a Fuji X100f and I was very impressed by the Pixel 6 images I was able to share with digital projection at my camera club. So I bought a Pixel 8 Pro that has much more capability with three lenses with 48 or 50 megapixels and raw options. And better skin color than the iPhone, which I thought was a weakness in the images in this video.. For the most part for my use, goodby X100f!
Huawei P70 Ultra , S24Ultra ,Oppo Find X7 Ultra, Xiaomi 14 Ultra,Pixel 8 Pro Vs FUJI FILM 100
The iPhone is the standard bro. It doesn’t imply it’s better but it has certainly set itself as the standard, it’s like the US Dollar, if you’re measuring the strength of an any currency, you’re most likely going to measure it against the dollar, and that’s just the way it is bro.
@@404BusinessDataAndAI "the standard" can't even get the skintone right 😂😂
@@mjkim0709 ya it’s laughable bro 😂😂, but this what happens when a product dominates in popularity, you can’t do a comparison test without the iPhone being there despite it not being the best anymore
Reject the negative comments. This was a good comparison for people considering the X100VI when so many own iPhones. Bottom line, iPhone video utterly destroys the X100VI. The photos are close, but here again, the iPhone produces excellent photos which are excellent for 99% of consumers. Difficult to justify $1600+ for a camera when the iPhone on your hip/pocket can do it all, especially video, at a lower price.
Samsung galaxy S24 Ultra is better than the iphone 15 pro max😎
Let's see the Fujifilm vs other flagship camera phones.
Title is hilariously misleading. The Fujifilm X100VI is not a professional camera. It is a hobbyist camera. No professional photographer is shooting weddings or magazine shoots with the X100VI.
No pro photographer is using an iPhone for that either, but they still call it the iPhone pro.
@@Kids11111 Title clearly states smartphone. Thanks for proving how dumb you are.
Why would you stop the Fuji down to f5.6 for a portrait comparison with the iPhone in portrait mode creating fake bokeh then you comment that the iPhone has more bokeh? Shoot the Fuji wide open to create a narrow depth of field like the iPhone is faking. Your comparison in this section is stupid.
iPhone can be setup to get what you are looking for. there are so many pre filters and also post processing. Looking at this, I cancelled the Fuji order. So much hype for nothing
Dope video!
Based on your video, I kind of feel like a 2nd camera is not entirely worth it - it just seems to be more trading blows rather than a definitive, you need both.
Question 1: Do you feel that adding some additional TLC/manual processing to iphone photos improves them to a point where it further closes the gaps between cameras?
I'm novice photographer but most of what I do now is somewhat casual - I do a lot of clouds, nature photos and some nature macro.
Now I do know cameras for macro will definitely win,
question 2: but are there any other scenarios above that you think it would be essential for me to have a higher end camera?
I was looking to upgrade my phone soon, but as an alternative, I was considering getting a high end camera, as the #1 reason for my upgrade is an improved camera, so any advice is appreciated.
For photo take:
- Vivo X100 Ultra
- Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
ANY of those phones is better than latest iPhone. 😉
For video it's more debatable, but if you ask me, iPhone lost it's crown there also. 🤔
if you can show us images less you you you... (Narcissism) everywhere... regular images of landscapes ...
This Fuji is not even an interchangeable less camera. This is not a professional camera but a hobbyist camera. If at least you used a Fuji xt5 or something
le X100VI a le meme capteur et le meme processeur que le X-T5 ! .... et l'iPhone n'a pas d'objectif interchangeable. Donc achetez vous un cerveau pour mieux comprendre...
Seems like the color showing it wrong, fuji is more retro look in result. My Fuji X70 shoot differently in good terms
Hmm, I have some doubts that iPhone is that washed out. Computational is designed and supposed to correct it. I have a Sony a6700, that I compare everyday with the iPhone. Both have strengths and weaknesses, but iPhone comes out first most of the situations. Iphone can be set to HEIF Max for sharper details.
Problem: You can’t buy Fujifilm X100VI anywhere in the world now. 😂
The Fuji colors are way better. That`s all i can see in this video because sharpness and artistic rendering are too low res to be noticed.
Oh, the depth of field effect is also way better on Fuji.
phone = looks a bad vfx, fuji = able for immersion. PHONE = Color unrealistic, Fuji color ok. Who wants to shoot with fake colors ?
Stabilisation is amazing on samsung n Apple than any mirrorless cameras
That is actually impressive how bad at photography can you be and still make a content about cameras. A professional camera has a lot bigger sensor and better optics than any phone so in right hands photos from a camera would be 10 times better. What is the point of taking portrait shots at around f5.6 and then saying that iphone has more "bokeh", no shit, maybe open your aperture to at least f2.8 or even f2 ? And those overexposed clouds...
And we shant forget it's raw photos so all the iPhones photos could be tweaked to perfection.
U should have compared by zooming photos so we could check the quality
All my videos on youtube shot by iPhone
A curious question: Are there people over eighty years of age who are very elderly people who own modern smart phones?!
Mostly You only focus on your skin tones… plz go attention to details
Amazing video as always
try to shoot with 1/4 shutter speed in f4 and iso 640 - black and white and then compare
Compare this camera against Sony Xperia 1 V or the up coming mark VI
No low-light / night comparision ?
Returned my fuji x100vi. iphone comes really close and it's always with you.
Where da hell is a 2X zoom lens on an iphone???
As long as they do not figure out video stabilisation it makes no sense to buy those cameras. We are increaslingly video-based
Use a gimbal if you care so much about video lol
What the point of comparing without a large print? You wont see any difference on a screen
So... million people are just dumb for buying 2000 euros cameras+2000euros lens. The solution it's an iPhone. Try to zoom a little bit and after doing, return here to comment the results with us. That's no serious.
Better comparisson (and better title also) would be:
*"Vivo X100 Ultra vs Fujifilm X100VI - Smartphone OR Proffessional Camera?"* 😉
Ideally the comparison should be with a DSLR camera actually costing Indian price around 1.5-2 lakh rupees and camera is anyday better
DSLRs are bulky and ugly.
In general, whether it's iPhone or Samsung, new phones take great photos, but only as a phone. comparing photos taken with a phone to a Fuji is like comparing shit to cottage cheese with honey. If you don't believe it, take a photo with your iPhone and Fuji and watch it on a 60" TV. Fuji, having 24mpx, consumes every phone in terms of quality and sharpness. Besides, most cameras from even 15 years ago outperform modern phones in terms of photo quality, and that is beyond dispute.
Indoor performance awesome 😎 DSLR
The x100vi is not a phone but this comparison is made as if you were comparing two phone cameras, pointless and misleading. The advantages you get with a dedicated camera and comparatively huge sensor is ignored completely.
Can't really see true differences on on screen side by sides. Certainly better on the TV vs phone , but such limited size.
Having had a Fujifilm XT1 for a long time now, there's simply zero comparison vs GFs iPhone 14 Pro when I output some wall prints at work. The relentless bad white balance and yellow hue seems go continue into the 15.
s24 ultra vs professional camera
professional cameras will always be better than smartphone cameras...
I would not call fuji x100vi a professional camera.
Amazing Comparison 👍🏻👌🏻
The comparison 🔥
The Fuji looks more like a phone to me 💀
On a small screen for sure, try making large prints or zooming in and you can easily see the difference, any phone picture falls apart quickly and turns mushy. You can try downloading some sample pictures and compare.
@@dsego84 ok. Yeah that is true. But most ppl will view it on a smartphone and compression on social media will likely make everything look the same 🥲🥲
Unique comparison video
i laways hate the potrait on the iphone
The Fuji is not a professional camera... And F2 doesn't give you more depth of field; it is very shallow depth of field. So confusing to watch this.
Just got offered a X100vi. I used to take a lot of pictures, but now I'm mainly using an (older) iPhone. I dunno if I'm going to use the camera that much... Is the demand still v. strong?
Why is she talking like on speed?
The x100vi is a profesional camera?
am not a model or a pro photographer so my phone cam is enough for me
iPhone simply needs better anti reflection coating to compete with the fuji claity and contrast
It still wouldn’t match the Fuji. When you blow up the pictures on a bigger display like a laptop or TV set, the iPhone shortcomings will be immediately apparent. On a tiny phone display, people are fooled into thinking that they’re comparable.
It's the sensor size, aps-c vs 1/2.5", it's physics, larger sensors, bigger glass. If it was that simple to compete, they would've done it, people spend serious money on big lenses and big sensors.
@@dsego84 a huge medium format ccd sensor would lose to a tiny modern iphone camera matrix in RAW so it's not all about the size. But where iphones and most other phones really fall behind cameras is in optics, it's literally plastic lenses with some poor anti reflection coating.
And i am guessing the iPhone won the blind camera comparison since you did not mention the results 🤭
중요한 부분이 빠졌네요. 야간촬영에서는 아이폰의 고질적인 고스트 현상 때문에 이 하나만으로도 아이폰은 전문적인 카메라와 비교자체를 하기도 민망해집니다.
Of course, pro camera fujifilm ❤
Hey now, let's check it out.
its not even close,.......
Don't put a photo of yourself taken by the iPhone on Tinder! 🥰🥰❤
of course, fuji
Do it with s24u
I don't understand why your face on the iphone looks so not good
iphone just noise..maybe one day they get big matrix
Fujifilm x100v look better ❤
how about zoom 600 or 300 mm
nice video 💯
Love the iPhone photos. Cancel your pre-order now people.
Vous pouvez toujours prendre RDV avec votre opticien
Now try both in football match😅
Not bad but it has a lazy eye in portrait.
Stop compare iPhone with Camera Digital. Phone nature is for call & Camera for photography. Don't try to produce useless content like that for gain profit and sponsor.
FUJI >>> Smartphones.
No phone can match a camera because of lens flare, the fuckin end.
Iphone is hundred years behind)) it never can be better than real camera. IPhone pictures looking like cartoon pictures with gray skin tone))