Eragon Movie Mistakes Fans Are BEGGING Disney Not To Make..
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 сен 2022
- Eragon Movie Mistakes Fans Are BEGGING Disney Not To Make..
Welcome back to Fantasy World, today on this channel we are going to talk about “ Eragon’s movie mistakes that we hope the Disney+ ‘Eragon’ Live-Action TV Series Adaptation In Works At Disney+” The 2006 Eragon movie was met with disappointment from both critics and fans of the original books, meaning there is naturally going to be some apprehension about the upcoming series. But there is some hope on the horizon, with the series author deeply involved with the new production, and the 2006 movie to serve as a guideline as to what should be avoided.
The casting choices made by director Stefen Fangmeier and his team were widely discussed in 2006. Not only were the characters' ages all over the place, but they also ignored the book descriptions of characters like Horst and his wife Elain. Disney+ is developing a live-action television series adaptation of Eragon, based on Christopher Paolini’s popular YA book series The Inheritance Cycle. Eragon is the first book in the series. In the series adaptation, a teenage boy becomes magically joined with a newly-hatched dragon. Together, they must learn what it means to be dragon and Rider as they fight in the resistance against a tyrannical king. Check this video out and stay!
#Disney #Eragon #Disney+
Related Videos:
Feeding A Dragon Movie Clip - Eragon (2006)
• Feeding A Dragon Movie...
Eragon Full Movies(How To Train Your Dragon)
• Video
Eragon: How Not to Start a Film Franchise
• Eragon: How Not to Sta...
Everything Wrong With Eragon In 14 Minutes Or Less
• Everything Wrong With ... 
Развлечения
Arya is meant to be alien like, thats the biggest thing about the elves, theyre not meant to look human, how about you point out the fact she was ginger, or wore white instead of having black hair and wearing all black. The film was loosley based on the characters, also in the film they show what looks liek a civil war between the dragon riders but that diddnt happen, it was 13 riders using gurilla tactics to take out the strongest riders, the film got essentially everything wrong. The bools lityerally describe the raazac as having beaks, Beaks! theyre immune to magic and live till the third book, theyre the driving force for roran and eragon meeting back up and repairing their relationship, the fillm offed them half way with MAGIC. also, the mark on eragons hand, Is a scar? The dwarves call riders Argetlam, meaning silver palm because the mark is meant to be a glowing sliver palm! The urgals being removed with the dwarves removes huge plot points in later books, for example, the urgals joining the rebel forces, murtagh killing the dwarf king being the reason he cant stay with natsuada or eragon as he was a king killing criminal. And Saphira had FEATHERS
And why remove her magic, ITS HOW DRAGONS FLY, eragon used magic to make broms grave then saphira used hers to make it diamond, also dragons dont die when their rider does, they just wish they did, with that logic Glaedr would never have been able to finish training eragon. What about angelica that mad witch was a huge influence in the books, and removing saphiras maturation removed the whole arc of eragon forming a bond with Brom by going to him to sneakily get advice. Also magic was gutted in the film, they ignored the whole point of the anchient language essentially cripling Galbatorix as that was the hidden ticking clock. There was no risk to using magic in the film, in the books using too much would kill the user.
Thank you for all this input. Super insightful 😃!
Yeah Arya was a huge letdown here, lol
and what about Arya WEARING A DRESS? The one she ALWAYS hated so much in books? Not to talk about her behaviour being "a princess who waits rescue" and flirting with Eragon while in books she nearly killed him, being about to die, and it took her near 2 years to accept him as a friend! Hope they will not do that again
@@user-mu6mf4rz6v well to be honest I don't really like her character in the books, at least some of her character, that is.
Not gonna lie, I fell in love with the movie… before I even knew about the books. Then I finally read the entire series and it’s safe to say I’m very disappointed in the movie. It skipped over the entire Hadarac Desert portion, Tronjheim, and completely left out the dwarves and elves altogether.
I’m praying the Disney adaptation fixes this because I’d love to see my favorite book series on screen properly this time.
Dont trust disney look what they did with the eye of the world
If you think Disney is gonna listen to what the actual fans want your high
Joemade7071,
Yeah, they don't listen to what the actual fans want. Disney is gonna ruin the whole thing like it always does now. They've ruined Star Wars with their crap new "canon" and they ruined several of their live actions remakes of their cartoons (it would have been far better if they had created new characters and new stories instead of giving us live action remakes which are rehashes of rehashes or rehashes and they are even woke rehashes that are now all about identity politics). Also, the folks at the Disney company always do stupid shit like completely neglecting plot and story so they can have forced diversity, or gender-swapping and/or skin color-swapping a bunch of characters over night for no damn reason even when it adds nothing to the story (which is basically tokenism), or completely changing the story and making it about woke/identity politics shit like racism, religious minorities, slavery, etc, instead of staying fateful to the original story and keeping the characters in character.
Also, no one understands and plays the character of Murtagh like Garrett Hedlund, his performance is the one thing that made the Eragon movie bearable, the one good thing about this movie, the one thing that makes the movie worth watching, it's like this character was made for him and he was fated to play this character, so I'm not interested in watching a stupid Disney series that has someone else (someone undeserving and unqualified who was not meant to play this character) playing my favorite Inheritance character. No thank you.
Also, I stopped watching Disney content after they ruined the Star Wars sequel trilogy movies (btw, "Heit to the empire", "Dark force rising" and "The last command", a book trilogy by Timothy Zahn, is a trillion times better sequel to "Return of the Jedi" than DLC's lame sequel trilogy movie will ever be) and ruined the character of Thrawn in the "Clone Wars" anime by making him into a one-dimensional villain and breaking continuity all over the place in the TV series "Obi Wan Kenobi" which by the way contract established lore in episode 4. This made me rage quit on Disney. The old EU Star Wars novels and comics are far better than this shit and 98% of the fanbase agree with me on this. I even have a couple friends who told me that when Disney release a new movie or a new TV show, they refuse to watch it and they binge read a dozen old EU novels instead because it's a million times better than the DLC's crap new "canon". I love the old EU Star Wars novels, I have 17 of them on my personal bookshelf, I have all the old EU Thrawn books (all 8 of 'em) including "Outbound flight" which is a freaking masterpiece (all of 'em by Timothy Zahn), the Medstar duology (by Michael Reaves and Steve Perry), "Darth Maul: Shadowhunter" and there's a bonus story with it called "Darth Maul: Saboteur" (by Michael Reaves), three Old Republic novels ("Revan" by Drew Karpyshyn, "Deceived" by Paul S. Kemp and "Fatal Alliance" by Sean Williams) and there's also "Cloak of deception" which is a prologue to episode 1 (by James Luceno), "The approaching storm" which is a prologue to episode 2 (by Alan Dean Foster) and "Labyrinth of "evil"" which is a prologue to episode 3 (by James Luceno).
The old EU Thrawn novels:
- "Outbound flight"
- "Heir to the empire"
- "Dark force rising"
- "The last command"
- "Choices of one"
- Specter of the past
- Vision of the future
- Survivor's quest
Mimi.
Oh man, god knows how much we need that satisfaction. Waited to long for it.
I have 0 faith in Disney as of right now, I've got more faith that a tissue paper can stop a flood.
Chistopher paolini takes part on the serie
@@Javier-ur7ly
"Christopher Paolini takes part on the serie."
But an Inheritance cycle movie or TV series is nothing without Garrett Hedlund and even if the TV series was made by a company other than Disney if Christopher Paolini doesn't involve Garrett in the project I would never even consider watching this new TV series or movie or whatever it is they have planned because no one underands and plays the character of Murtagh like Garrett does, his performance is the one thing that made the Eragon movie bearable, the one good thing about this movie, the one thing that makes the movie worth watching, it's like this character was made for him and he was fated to play this character, so I'm not interested in watching a stupid Disney series that has someone else (someone undeserving and unqualified who was not meant to play this character) playing my favorite Inheritance character. No thank you. I feel offended and betrayed just thinking about how Paolini is considering taking part on a series without involving the one talented actor who was meant to play my favorite character because he understands and plays this character like one else could. How can Paolini not see this, that no one else could qualify to and/or adequately play this character? How can he not see that he already has the most perfect Murtagh he could ever hope for, how can he go for second or even third best when he can have THE best? I'm not going to watch the Disney TV series, I'd rather read the books instead.
I'm also extremely disappointed that the audiobook version of the novel "Murtagh" by Christopher Paolini is narrated by Gerard Doyle instead of Garrett Hedlund. He should be the one voicing his character in the book centered around his character. That he was also left out of this project make me feel offended and hurt. I find it very sad that that the people behind the TV series and the audiobook can't seem to see his talent or that this character was obviously made for him. Also, someone should send a free copy of the novel "Murtagh" to Garrett Hedlund, if someone has the right to know about the development, growth and fate of this character it's the one who understands and plays the character like no one else ever could and who gave us an outstanding performance.
Mimi.
The movie had potential but they cut too many important stuff, and the urgals were a joke. Sapphira looked gorgeous, durza was just how I imagined him, and Jeremy irons gave a great performance as Brom tbh. They just missed a lot of important stuff and changed too much on others, like sapphira growing. The final battle on air was cool but needed to end like the book with them shattering the Isidar Mithirim. The dvd actually had a lot of important deleted scenes like the twins, the blessing/curse, roran and katrina. Pity they ruined it, but I'm glad disney is making a series out of it. It's a huge book to fit in a movie without rushing it.
And I don't know why I've never read the the rest of the rest or the books.. I believe I'll start from the beginning and read all of them
Completely disagree on the casting of Jeremy Irons. He was completely fine as Brom. Although I wish that Ray Stevenson was alive to play him.
I still think Cirque du Freak is the worst book to movie adaptation
this is disney's only chance of regaining my trusts with them, if they purposefully not to realized what the movie had messed up what the books are originally, then my choice of disliking them will remain, for good.
Amazing! Every word of what you just said, was right!!! =D
So tbf I'm not a fan of the movie either but feels like you're being a little unfair on some points and others you're completely right. "Eragon finding the egg just happens, the audience is given little to no information about who the protaganist is and what's going on" That is exactly down to a T like the book. From the point that Eragon is introduced until the egg shows up in the book is literally "he can track deer". Even tho they got Aryas appearance wrong she is supposed to be kinda alien and wierd. Murthag is supposed to be a couple of years older than Eragon(thought the actor actually was pretty spot on in the movie). Eragons appearance was wrong and so was Broms but atleast Broms personality felt pretty accurate to the books. Personally I hope they focus on getting the key elements right and just stick to the actual story. The biggest issue was that they changed so many things that they couldn't continue the second movie even if they wanted too.
I loved all the actors but maybe 1. All good to me. I'll be looking for the books now to finish what Disney didn't
They nailed the casting lmao
I have to say that movie vs book, yes the movie is bad, but the movie in general is great putting the book aside.
Sloan and durza were the best casting decision.
Regardless to what anyone says their opinion everyone's entitled to. I myself I love the movie I wish they'd make another Movie for each book..
I read the books when I was 10 and after reading Murtagh six years later, I wanted to watch the movie out of sheer curiosity. I'd heard it was terrible, but it defied my expectations. First off, who adapts a 500-page book into a 1 and a half hour movie ? Who ? Someone who's willing to cut out all of the interesting parts, it seems. Given the success of the series, I suppose the budget ought to have been high, but the whole thing looked incredibly cheap, in every aspect, particularly the digital effects, with 0 efforts made to respect the book's descriptions. What's more, the movie, by its very existence, prevents the making of a sequel because it leaves aside everything that's developed in the next books. Not content with deleting most of the book's features, Fangmeier even decided to add stuff that was never there (Durza riding a dragon ? Galbatorix being shown at all, and throwing a tantrum ??). It's like the filmmakers didn't dare make an adaptation of the book. If you're calling your movie "Eragon", why don't you just bring Eragon on screen as the title says, instead of something else entirely ? I have in mind the examples of Harry Potter and even Hunger Games. Making a book into a good, faithful movie IS possible.
I will never forget how mind fucked I was when the fight scene against the Ra'Zac was like 1 minute and then they're dead and brom just mentioned that they were Ra'Zac and that's it... I mean, they were the reason why Eragon started his travel! They're shitty creatures but important as characters and didn't deserve this treatment... the absence of dwarfs was also mind blowing and I could say a lot of other things too (Urgals just like bald men?)Eragon is blonde and not brown haired like in the books?) but the Ra'zac thing will always be my ''bad highlight''. If you don't know the books you can probably enjoy the movie but knowing the books made it painful, sadly.
Check out that title sequence in the beginning of the movie 😂 RIGHT OFF THE BAD
The development is cancelled-- well, shelved at least for now. I don't see it coming out. Disney wants to get away from endless reboots and Spiderwick and Eragon were on the chopping list
The first mistake is Disney is remaking it
5:51 YES
THANK YOU
To be honest, I think people really are unfair to the movie. Everyone wants the movie to be the same as the books. There's not enough time for really good books to have it all shown. But in my opinion, Eragon has a harder job than most with that. There are just so many different moving pieces with the story. I do think a show format is a better fit to properly tell this story. I struggled with a few casting choices with the movie, but overall, I think they did well. And very much have to disagree with the video's take on Jeremy Irons as Brom. He's exactly the way I pictured him (maybe a little less of a manicured beard, haircut, and outfit. But otherwise the same). I also liked Weiss, Carlyle, and Hedlund in their roles. I like the movie for what it is. But would be happy with a good show version. Maybe if they can recreate the feeling of it being faithful to the source material that the Percy Jackson show supposedly for, it will turn out well. But thank goodness Netflix didn't buy the rights. We'd never have a chance at maybe getting more of the series made. Almost anyone else would be better at this point.
There's way too much filler in the book to fully adapt it into a movie, and for a tv show it would be boring; like some of it was in the book. Carlyle as Durza was brilliant casting! Hedlund as Murtagh is a good choice he was just too underdeveloped; Irons as Brom was pretty good. The Percy Jackson show race swapped Anabeth and her Mom so fuck that; that's not faithful to the book.
Ngl it alwys the producers that rlly make a show, Bert Salke is a great producer and having the funding Disney provides should make this a visually masterpiece but I think this will rlly depend on the writers and the ppl pulling the strings. They should bring back Stefen for the vfx department and jus make some great casting choices(preferably new actors only if they not doin that over woke bs)
Durza was supposed to hqve red eyes.
Durza in the Eragon movie does have red eyes, and red hair. The actor played him perfectly!
Not gonna lie I loved Eragon I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it
Must be one of the few who liked the movie was it perfect no but it was entertaining
I was a fan of the movie Eragon . I do not understand how they don't see a great movie. There should of been an Eragon 2
i REALY hope they make angela mor like in the book...she's definitly one of my favorite characters...she doesn't give a f*ck about the world and just wants to prove that things, that exist, don't exist...like frogs xD
Anyone who thinks DISNEY is going to honor this books source material is foolish Star Wars and MSHEU should've taught you that by now. Christopher shouldn't have trusted Disney.
I felt the actor as Eragon was great,Brom great.John Malkavich great the dragon was great. They ended with an open ending only mistake leaving fans wanting the rest of the story.
I would say the only mistakes they made was A) not reading any source material and B) releasing the movie under the title Eragon.
Have you read the book ? No offense, but I doubt you could say that if you had. This movie should simply not be called Eragon, because it is not an adaptation of the nameske book. The actors did what they could, but Brom's personality and feel in the book are just completely different (side note : he's supposed to have a long white beard). Galbatorix does not appear at all in Eragon until the fourth and last book, where all that is shown of him is the outline of his silhouette and the sound of his voice, and his facial features are only revealed in the very last pages. Besides, how do you want to have the rest of the story when none of what the sequels contain is shown in the film ? Orik and the dwarves, Tronjheim, the elves, Teirm, Angela, Solembum, Elva, Jeod, Murtagh's crush on Nasuada, Eragon's incapacitating wound... SO MANY main characters and arcs left aside. You simply cannot make a sequel because three quarters of the people and things that make them up are absent. Unless you invent an entirely new story, which you could as a result not call Eragon, it's not possible.
It's pronounced "Al-GAY-see-uh"
It’s Al-uh-gay-zee-uh, if you look in the back of the books there is a pronunciation section. Hope this helps 😊
@@sharnageorge7075 Oh, I forgot a vowel. :D-P
The movie did suck and only covered about 68% of the first book, that being very inaccurate. This overview video sucked. Talk sh,, when you actually read the 5 novels!
Yay Disney has the reigns which means it will be the biggest woke crap to be released yet.....well at least amazon is not making it, dont know if the world can take another rings of disaster type of series.
You thought rings of power were a disaster? I saw it’s faults, man, maybe I’m giving them too much credit. For Eragon, yeah, high likelihood of wokeness being present, but not too much. Disney has a new CEO because they went too woke!
@@fantasyworld8993 I'd say it's a whole lot of modern people don't think it completely through or know too little to do so. My firm enjoyment of elf / fairy realms doesn't do with the scenes it does with how well the story respects their hidden ancient myth of honor, and how respectfully the characters cooperate while solving the problem.
I'm not picky about how Tuatha De Danann characters in Tir Na Nog of old Celtic lands, Earlier Alfar of the desert or Elves of the north / Elf-like creatures of other lesser known areas look I've read enough hidden stuff to realize their worldwide relationship.
Norse / German elf above ground, for fertility wisdom or telling the future
Norse / German elf below the dirt or coming out of the caves for Smith work or warrior skills.
Adding some gemstone magic related to historic ideas would be fine. But friendly encouragement of doing the right thing is the thing I'd hope for the most. I loved Donita K. Paul's Realm Walkers Triology similar teamwork with dragons except gentler quotes.
Elves in Europe, Elves in America, Elves in Asia's desert, plus hidden elf scenes in Africa too, that's what I'm familiar with due to both ancestry secrets and my unusual enjoyment of magical stories.
What nonsense are you saying? Yes, the movie being lambasted by critics, it was nearly a failure. But you're becoming delirious...😕
I thought the casting for Roran was spot on-he and Eragon looked just like true cousins.
And Jeremy Irons is always the right choice for a mentor warrior. 🫶🏽
They cut so much lore for pacing issues, there was no way they could do the subsequent films.