Porsche Taycan Turbo GT ( 1108 Hp ) "wet condition" vs Tesla Model S Plaid ( 1020 Hp ) 0-200 Km/h!!!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 дек 2024

Комментарии • 47

  • @davidfujkk8018
    @davidfujkk8018 6 месяцев назад +28

    Its not urbo gt,it is turbo s with 939 bhp,please be more accurate

    • @nomansland120
      @nomansland120 6 месяцев назад

      and how do you know it's not the Turbo *1034hp GT in this video?

    • @davidfujkk8018
      @davidfujkk8018 6 месяцев назад +3

      @@nomansland120 i saw this exact video with 7.9 sec to 200 kph with name of turbo s,turbo gt does it in sub 7 seconds

    • @nomansland120
      @nomansland120 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@davidfujkk8018 what don't you understand about wet condition?

  • @retbul001
    @retbul001 17 дней назад

    Nice test… Porsche on wet😂😂😂

  • @lukabosnjak3829
    @lukabosnjak3829 5 месяцев назад +1

    Drive train of the Plaid (battery and especially motors) are still years ahead of the others, for example Plaid has those crazy carbon sleeved rotors which basically do not lose power with the speed increase, co engineered with spaceX apparently, so even with 2 speed gearbox and more power, (from what I've seen so far) Porsche will still be slower especially as the speed increases >200kmh (you can search Plaid power curve to see why).
    Still there's absolutely no denying that the Taycan GT Ring result is astonishing but with 200k apart from Model S, its hardly even seen as a competitor...
    I would also say that there's no denying which one is a better overall car between the two

    • @АлексейКастевич
      @АлексейКастевич 4 месяца назад +1

      There is nothing exactly special about tesla powertrain, pretty basic motors and inverters apart from that strange desicion to use carbon sleeve in an IPM.

  • @fragu123
    @fragu123 4 месяца назад +1

    The Taycan maybe the much better car from an engineering perspective as well as track performance wise but still, the Tesla is a lot cheaper, not too bad and almost as fast in a straight line….

  • @bmrdx
    @bmrdx 6 месяцев назад +8

    Porushe is raining

  • @g00gl31s3vil
    @g00gl31s3vil 6 месяцев назад +3

    Useless video! Also the Plaid's torque is rated at 1420NM and for fairness you should put a disclaimer for the peak Porsche power. Under normal conditions it's 777hp. The absolute peak power is achieved for 2 seconds and the rest 1000ish hp for 8 seconds total. After that power will drop to 777hp.

  • @hasangenc2922
    @hasangenc2922 4 месяца назад +1

    Almost as fast as the soccermom Plaid in the wet.

  • @AgnieszkaKowalska-g3b
    @AgnieszkaKowalska-g3b 4 месяца назад +1

    So turn on "sport + mode".

  • @ersindemirci2673
    @ersindemirci2673 3 месяца назад

    Its not the Turbo GT with 1108 but the Turbo s with 939 hp AND THE PORSCH IS ON THE VERY VERY WET TARMAC...

  • @ChosenMJ
    @ChosenMJ 3 месяца назад +1

    Here’s a better representation and typical run of the Plaid on the street.
    ruclips.net/video/7asAMs9d1f4/видео.htmlsi=baX6nVKk7kr-a717

  • @fenegroni
    @fenegroni 4 месяца назад +2

    What all these videos fail to show is how repeatable the performance is: Tesla is definitely ahead in terms of pure numbers, and some of the technology is also still ahead, but can the performance be repeated lap after lap? If not (see latest M3P) then one has to take into account if they really intend to use this on the track. On the public road, it's more about stability at high speed and comfort, as well as luxurt and technology, and price. A single drag race isn't going to clarify any of the points above.

  • @mikekos7606
    @mikekos7606 25 дней назад

    1108 hp slow G80 with 720 hp.

  • @AgnieszkaKowalska-g3b
    @AgnieszkaKowalska-g3b 4 месяца назад

    you forgot to turn off "normal mode"

  • @salmanillustrator5540
    @salmanillustrator5540 6 месяцев назад +2

    Lets be honest 99 percent of those wont ne driving at such speeds except totally useless to be that fast

    • @TB-vb3ov
      @TB-vb3ov 6 месяцев назад

      That's like saying it's pointless to have a car do 1.3ga when 1.0x is more than enough for moat drivers. Might as well buy a Plaid and put carbon brakes on it and call it a day.

    • @fitzproject
      @fitzproject 6 месяцев назад

      @@TB-vb3ovnah, but usually when you do hit that speed. Its nice if the car handles well. Its also nice if the car looks good and is well built. Tesla is miles away from luxury.

    • @aname-kg3cb
      @aname-kg3cb 4 месяца назад

      teslas have bad build quality but sure they do give the price for the performance 💪

    • @ChosenMJ
      @ChosenMJ 3 месяца назад +1

      @@aname-kg3cbThey used to. Grow up they are built much better than five years ago.

    • @aname-kg3cb
      @aname-kg3cb 3 месяца назад

      @@ChosenMJ see the durability testing of the CyberTruck uploaded by whistlindiesel. recent tesla vehicle and I really don't think that accelerator pedal coming off is a feature of trucks. Just accept that they have bad build quality.

  • @Th3Pull3rb0y99
    @Th3Pull3rb0y99 6 месяцев назад +35

    The Porsche is slower, but fortunately it costs 3x more.... wait

    • @starkillerchardin3050
      @starkillerchardin3050 6 месяцев назад +22

      Porsche IS not slower in the vidéo and if you compare it on dry thé tesla IS destroy and you can't compare thé Price because thé Porsche taycan is way more confortable more option a lot better finition and it look intérieur and exterior way more sexy and cool and dont talk about the soud of thé Porsche or even thé track and street performance who are miles Away in front of thé tesla this two car are not in thé same level or range you can't compare them in fact

    • @TB-vb3ov
      @TB-vb3ov 6 месяцев назад +3

      ​@starkillerchardin3050 Yawn a lot of lies and I would hope it had more features being it cost 3x the price. Let's see what Tesla has on it...The Plaid is slightly quicker 9.2 va 9.4 quarter mile, a lot more room, a better sounding sound sytem and better UI and has access to the Tesla super charger network. That's all a fact.

    • @JannoG4
      @JannoG4 6 месяцев назад

      The reason is, that the Porsche can do that performance all Night Long. The Tesla? Well, its more like a premature ejaculation. One shot and Game over.

    • @melo_pro
      @melo_pro 6 месяцев назад

      @@TB-vb3ov LOL. :D

    • @melo_pro
      @melo_pro 6 месяцев назад +8

      Slower? It's fucking raining. You saw that, right? And the Porsche not really have more hp. And this Porsche, as any other, do these 0-200km/h times over and over again, now. No waiting minutes for special "Gepard" mode...And if you give them a track with just 1 curve, the Tesla will be even more destroyed, than it already is.
      Seriously, these are 2 totally different cars. It's a shame for Porsche, that somebody seriously compare it to a Tesla. Performance-wise, ok, but that's it.
      Quality, engineering, workmanship, Race track, Tesla can say "Goodbye". Take a look for tests, what an excellent car the Turbo GT is. I'm not a fan of electric cars, but this Porsche is not comparable to Tesla, no matter what it costs.

  • @M8KES
    @M8KES 3 месяца назад +1

    So many Tesla Fanboys...😂