HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 дек 2023
- We are trying to use extreme testing to raise consumer awareness of #new energy sources. It may not be what we hoped for, but at least we have opened a window first. --New Energy Breakthrough Program. Watch this video and see the test results! Let’s chat in the comments together!
Autohome provides you with the most wonderful automobile news, market, reviews and shopping guide videos.
Choosing a car, buying a car or using a car, go to autohome!
----------------------------------------------------------
★Welcome to subscribe our only official channel: / @autohome-athm
----------------------------------------------------------
★Videos are subject to the music copyright, which may lead to some clips without sound.
----------------------------------------------------------
★The copyright of this video belongs to autohome. If you reprint it without permission, you will suffer copyright complaints.
#autohome #auto #automobile #EV 
Авто/Мото
Many useful information, instructive video. Insane amount of work. Thx💯
The Volvo is on a platform designed in 2014 and the Tesla on one designed much more recently, but still is designed with much more redundancy. Volvo for life!
Volvo XC60 failed IIHS new side test.
@@chrisak49Except it didn’t fail. It just didn’t get a “good” rating, it scored an “acceptable” rating.
To understand that - a 10 year old car, without any side upgrades, without the addition of a centre airbag, without the addition of a seat mounted rear airbag, managed to score better than most of the new newer designed vehicles in this test class.
The new barrier is heavier, it moves faster, and has a more dangerous shaped structure that is designed to punch through the side of a car to cause much more damage, like a bull bar would.
This test required the car to absorb 80% + more energy than it was designed for, and still passed the test.
That platform won’t be updated because the XC60 is being replaced by the ex60, which I bet you will be passing the safety impact standards in another decade.
@@asum307 Volvo is held to a high standard. Anything not rated Good instead of Acceptable is considered a fail. The XC40 also did not do well in the updated side tests and that platform is even newer.
@@chrisak49 That’s not true at all. 😂 You’re talking shit right now.
Out of that updated side test at the time, very few cars managed to score a good, as a matter of a fact, in the updated side test for small SUVs only the Mazda CX-5 did.
Something you forgot to mention is that when the XC40 was retested with the updated tests it was only 1 of 2 SUVS to get a good test result in the frontal offset.
The Mazda that scored so well went from good, to a poor rating in the updated tests because their cars were only built for the tests, not for actual safety.
I might add that the same Volvo that got acceptable for the updated side crash test received a top safety pick plus for the 2022 year.
Volvo is really a great and safe car.
However, the tesla 3 which is the base design of model y, was presented in 2016. So the design was probably not much newer.
With introduction of gigacast one could say that it's a larger change, but most is still the same. The xc60 has also seen updates since 2014.
非常值得參考的好節目！另外就是台灣有出現幾場事故是model Y高速側撞之後斷成兩截，不知道有沒有辦法針對這個問題進行測試，謝謝！
Really liked the info about the back passenger. If people don't watch the whole video basically the front passengers are completely fine in this crash, but the back passengers got it really bad.
Fantastic video, guys! Very very informative! Insane amout of work!
Ps: Volvo for life
Good show 👍
Both cars did really well. I own both, but the X instead of Y.
Fantastic video! You should try an "old/new" car crash. I don't know how an 2010 Volvo S80 (for example) will perform in situations like this
Thanks again!!
круть! жгите ещё!
Nice
Great video! thanks God for the air bags….and the closed captions. 😊
Man they talk fast!
@@andreidermeI changed the speed of video to 1/2, so I could easily read the subtitles.
Amazing!
more cinematic than ncap 🗿
The production value of this series is insane. However the relative speed is not 128kmh as started in this video at 4:01. Mythbusters already corrected and proven this in a special episode.
Can you use china BYD to do a safety testing. Thank
would like to see the BYD vs Honda CRV tests as well.
Too slow, only 64kph?
I'd expect it to be at least 50mph (80kph)
Volvo fanboys trying to hold their breath
Seems like a paid advertisement from Volvo.
The rear dummy moved so bad, there is no way it was getting better reads. The door was not opening properl, but had been explained...
the door opened enough and the tesla door couldn’t be opened after an hour, that was the only difference IMO
В Тесле шею сломал в Вольво живой а так да почти одинаковые😂
是哪个车结果比较好呢？
Volvo won ❤
Im in my 2nd XC60. Got tee boned my 1st at about 60 kmh. On passenger side. Definitely get the Volvo at least I know it won't catch fire and doors can open in a nasty accident so you can get out.
8:30 шее кабздец
Add 10kmh and Tesla would be a meatball.
All crashes are different and the Model Y has already proven to be the safest vehicle on the road by a wide margin. No, I don't have one
N’importe quoi. Le Y a obtenu la meilleure note de tous les SUV aux crash tests. Révisez vos aprioris !
No, Tesla has an actually better safety cage due to the batteries adding additional strength to the structure.
Fireball
@@jobathano1660You have wifi under your rock?
Which won?
Volvo won!
@@vdn999No, it didn’t! Look at the test results. Tesla dummy has absorbed much less energy on all body parts, except for the knees (due to the Volvo knee airbag). That is what matters in a crash and not the visible cosmetics of the car. Tesla crumples more in some parts for a reason. And also the driver’s door could be opened easily on the Tesla and not so much on the Volvo. It is crucial if you can open the door in a crash and escape quickly or be taken out. So, in short - Tesla clearly won!
😂 watch at 11:11, Volvo no damage to the windscreen and roof, that means the Volvo body is more stronger than Tesla, 10km more and the driver will be dead in Tesla, because we can see clearly there is a very big damaged to the body structure, the Tesla driver will be smashed same like in Brilliance bs6, on Volvo the front wing come on top of door, so is not big problems to open the door, this is happened because Volvo used a strong steel when making wings, doors... One person crash in one winter my Volvo 855 1994, my car moved 1m from where I left parked, 855 had just a scratch on the rear bumper but anoter car( Opel zefira 2005)smashed rear lights, cracked rear bumper and bend rear wing.😊
@@vdn999 No
@@jeremie.d ?
这种速度碰撞，2车后排的乘客都死了（脖子脊椎都断了）
นี่ถ้าเทสล่าชนในความเร็วที่มากกว่านี้อาจเกิดการลุกไหม้ของแบ็ตเตอร์รี่
The Volvo might catch fire also.
Non, batterie LFP. Elle ne prend pas feu.
Tesla weighs thousands of pounds more then xc60 so it did really well
Same weight fool you can’t read? It’s within a handful of KG both under 2000kg
這種測試裡面放假人不夠準確啊 下次請真人下去做測試好嗎!
好的，下次邀请你坐进去。我们会在旁观看😊
就你去了
感谢你为科学挺身而去
VOLVO BEST !!!! tesla beeee fuuuuu
The Tesla dummies had better protection scores but the presenter argues the Tesla has some risk concerns..... Hmmm ok....
Где же лучшие задний пасажир шею сломал)))
TESLA best ........Volvo is Sh#t
tesla is shit
怎么不和相同是电车的小米su7对撞测试一下呢？