Canon 5D Mark III vs Nikon D800 Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- Canon 5D3: Amazon: amzn.to/2jgxF64
B&H: www.bhphotovide...
www.learningdsl...
I'm really excited to have reviewed both with Canon 5D Mark III and the D800. I have been shooting with both of these camera for awhile and have been taking them both everywhere I go trying them in side by side in different lighting conditions, cloudy, mixed lighting, extreme low light, swimming pools, silhouettes, even time lapses, comparing skin tones, slow motion, landscapes, and pictures styles, and I think I have found some interesting stuff about these cameras that no one else is talking about.
I've been wanting to buy a full frame camera for awhile now and I have waiting for the Canon 5D Mark III to come out, but now that Nikon has step up their game on the video side of things, there are two cameras to consider now. Are you an amateur like me wanting to step up to a full frame? In this video comparison I will be talking about this from the amateur level This is by far my most thorough comparison I have ever done since I will be buying one of these cameras.
First off, both have pluses and minuses, they are both full frame, have dual card slots SD and CF, 100 view finder coverage, weather sealed body, both have a somewhat similar Continuous Shoot Speed, both have excellent auto focus systems, and both now have new headphone jacks.
Music by Premiumbeat.com
See my blog for the rest...
www.learningdsl...
Canon 5D3 pricing:
Amazon: amzn.to/2jgxF64
B&H: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/847545-REG/Canon_5260A002_EOS_5D_Mark_III.html/BI/6499/KBID/7145
This is damn timeless. Watching it 11 years later and still makes a lot of sense.
Thanks!
I've been back and forth between various Nikon and Canon products over 20+ years of shooting. This "war" between their fans is insane. They're both the top two cameras (and the Panasonic GH series is coming on fast as well) that it's just splitting hairs between the two of them. I've now gone Nikon due to the glass and other features I prefer (I feel Nikon cuts better with my RED) but you can make amazing, amazing videos with both Nikon AND Canon. These two cameras are both phenomenal.
He went with the 5d the best camera digivt.com/canon5dmarkiii has this camera read the reviews there too
Again, it's splitting hairs... BOTH are great cameras and there's this stupid nerd war between Nikon and Canon owners. It's a matter of preference. He prefers the Canon, doesn't make it "the best." The DP of the show Wilfred prefers the D800 and won a Cinematography award for it, still doesn't make Nikon the best... it's a matter of preference.
I know exactly how you feel. Nikon and Canon are the top flagships of photography DSLRs and seeing fans argue about it is just sad. Whether you're a Nikon or Canon user, the point is cameras were made to capture the moment and Canon and Nikon do that excellent in their own ways.
If theres anything photographers should argue about, at the very least, be DSLRs vs. Camera-phones.
I can’t believe this video to be 8 years old. It’s phenomenal even in 2020. You did an amazing job thanks for the tips.
Glad you enjoyed it!
For a so called "amateur", this is one hell of a video. Kudos!
Where Mr Dougdale shines, is in his professional and very clear manner of speaking and the way he explains things, as if he was a school teacher or a college professor. He is what I would call a 'natural teacher'. While I agree with you that he does a fantastic job overall for most listeners, where he falls short is his level (or lack of knowledge on most of the things he reviews. For a beginner who knows nothing, he is great and probably the best on RUclips. But the way he titles his videos cleverly to get more eyeballs, he ropes in professional level viewers who are usually disappointed with his lack of in depth knowledge on almost every subject that he covers. To me, its as if he tries to bite off too much and do more reviews than he is actually qualified for and that's why I give him credit for admitting that he is on the 'amateur' level. He also tends to cover just the basics and topics that are all over the place elsewhere on RUclips, rather than truly unique content that us professionals are after.
You, my friend, are what's known as a hater. How many videos of better content and quality do you have online?
All of those compliments that I mentioned and you call me a hater? Wow! At the end, I just fine tuned where his niche is and stated the reasons why, which is not derogatory or hateful at all.
And if I start doing photography tutorials (I just might, actually) and that's one reason that I look at them with a critical eye, because I'm looking for my own niche and I think I found it, because I have uncovered Doug's weakness! Remember, everyone cannot be everything to everyone! And as I said earlier, Doug does a tremendous job and he's superior teacher--even a naturally gifted teacher--and I rarely ever have said that, because he has a rare gift. What I did notice, is that Doug tends to be in a hurry to put up too many videos, without any real substance, In fact, in some cases, he just has an attention-getting title and gorgeous video, with little worthwhile information, except to rookies , maybe. In many of his videos, he readily admits that he's an amateur and often asks for help from the viewers, on the topic that was my reason for watching in the first place. I don't want to waste all my time watching his videos just to be asked what I was wanting clarification on, in the first place. Despite all that, I enjoy watching his videos, because when he actually is knowledgeable on a topic, his explanation is exemplary. My only beef is to ask him to please limit his pumping out of new videos on topics that he knows little about, just for the sake of getting hits on RUclips. After all, its not a secret that placing a title up there on something everyone is searching for it a way to get hits, but when the video doesn't really have any substance, it just wastes people's time who took the time to view it.
Bobby Lopez Creative Aparently, you read what he said but understood the opposite of his intentions. Who said he was complaining? He was actually praising the video!!!
TOTALLY AGREED!! I went with the Nikon D-800E. Hoping I DON’T encounter that “green” tinge issue, maybe I should have spent another grand for the D-750. I have four GOOD AF Nikon lenses (50mm, 35-70, 70-210, 35mm micro), so, that’s why I picked the D800E, and back in the day, the Nikon F-3 HP I owned, was better than the Cannon “pro” film camera then. Maybe I made the wrong choice. IDK. If I switched, what would I do with my lenses?? IDK at the moment. This camera confounds me!! Now I feel like I’ve NEVER owned a camera before, it’s SO DIFFERENT!! SO much to learn!! Film to digital. I’m a “newbie” all over. Film I understand, and had photos published in the Atlanta Journal, but now, I have NO idea how to use this bloody camera!! 😔
D800 eats 5diii. I own both. Literally took them both out for a few weeks to take identical photos to decide which camera to keep and I have come to the conclusion the D800 is better in every way including noise - especially when resizing 36mp images to the same as the Canon. Dynamic range on Nikon slaughters Canon and photos can be manipulated in post so much more than the Canon ones. The Canon files just fall apart so quickly even at high ISO's.
I love the part where you say you're an amateur. Not. Your videos are some of the most professional on youtube.
I just upgraded my D200 to a D800. It is an amazing camera. Thanks for this video, looks like it took a lot of work. Great job!
Welcome to joy!
that picture incoming at 18:10 in combination with "I'm just an amature" .. just golden :')
I solved the white balance issue with my d800 using lightroom preset that I created just for d800. It's really easy just 1 click to apply :) I used 5D Mark iii a lot before D800 but I noticed that my photos were mostly over satruated especially after HDR images processing. I don't like the blue, red, orange, and green color on Canon 5D mark iii. The green color on Canon 5D Mark iii is just too artificial. It looks too bluish-and-too bright. I now go back to Nikon because the Nikon can pick up colors better than 5D Mark iii can't. I'm not a video person so I have no problem with the ISO so far.
Rachel Gore how did you change to white balance to? I am having this issue as well
Dave, I am a full time professional. And I have been for years. Your reviews are great and I don't care if you make zero or 100.000 dollars with photography/ I care about the simple, precise way you show your findings and opinions.
I dont know if you are an engineer, but you have that kind of precise way to go about things.
Thanks.
The 5D Mark III was a really good well rounded camera. The D800 while it lacked in video performance, it gained a lot in dynamic range, detail, picture ISO. But between the two, go for D750 which blows the 5D Mark III out of the water
D750 owner here. You sir are telling the God’s Honest Truth!
And if you’re savvy about certain things you can get really good video out of the D750 as well
Fantastic video! Very clear and just easy to watch! Can't say I've ever watched an 19 minute review video without skipping parts, but I did with this, and easily!
You say you're an amateur, your knowledge is more than pros Lol.
Man you dont sound like an amateur at all talking like this, this is one of the most detailed comparison video i´ve ever seen
My D800E is on its way...thanks for the review.
Very nice, high quality comparison. Thank you! Regarding the white balance, green tint on the Nikon, using the correct ICM colour profile in my raw developer, which is RAW Therapee eliminated the issue for me. I also have my monitors calibrated. So if you struggle with subtle colour phenomena, make sure to be using the correct input colour profile. Cheers!
P.S. A professional is not necessarily a person making a living out of their photography. Being a professional means having mindset, where we learn consciously, challenge ourselves to further our art. Your vid is of top quality and indeed you are a professional the way I understand it. Way to go.
Amazing review! Thank you. What were you shooting the main head shoot/narration with (video and audio)? Thanks!
Wow! This is the real Johnny Harris with an old school comment/question. Hi Johnny! Love your videos.
Wow Jhonny Harris himself 10 years ago !! time flies by
3:44 checkout the window below coors sign. you can see the tree branches using D800 while 5D mk 3 window is blown out. D800 dynamic range trumps 5D mk 3
Dave, I think you've done a fabulous job here explaining the pros and cons of these cameras. Well done!
It's so hard to decide when you have such great options to choose from.
I also wish Canon would just freaking listen about the flip and twist screens. I switched from the 7D to the 70D and I have used that flip out screen in almost 95% of everything I have used it for. Even when I am using both cameras, I've got the screen flipped out on the 70D so I can watch it while I'm standing next to the 7D with my audio setup.
As far as color is concerned, I forked out the 15 bucks or so for the Visioncolor and Visiontech profiles. I had used the Cinestyle for a while, but I much prefer the visioncolor. Far more manageable.
As always, a fantastic vid. Thanks!
Thanks! I like my flip screen on my t3i.
Dave Dugdale how much is Canon 5D in Usa ?
***** Well that may be the case, but that's the reason I bought the 70D to replace my 7D and I am no longer considering getting a higher end Canon. I have the glass necessary for a 5D mk whatever and I even have the budget for it, but without that flip screen, I'd rather pay $500-1000 for a black magic or two.
With all the respect to all Canon owners, but I've had owned Canons in the past, but for some reason, that I won't discuss here and much less engage in a hot argument with Canon lovers, but when you bring the Nikon cameras into the picture here...Canons get relegated to big humongous second place . I've had owned Canons F1s, A1s, Eos1 ,all films in the 1980s and 1990s, but even given the fact, that Canon took the lead a decade ago, when digital went into full swing, Nikon slowly is coming back to where Nikon is always been since the mighty "F" of 1959...the mighty leader. Just take a look, how things are developing. Remember my two F3s, compared to the Canon F1, back in the 1980s. I remember my two F5s, compared to the Canon Eos1 in the 1990s. Now, this days, compare the Eos1D, to the D4s...sorry Canon guys, but no...Canon is relegated to a second place.
Part of Dave's appeal is that he is modest and even self-effacing but I hope he underestimate how much he is appreciated by true newbies like myself. His videos are without doubt the most well-produced and enlightening on YT. Sterling guy.
You are so humble to talk yourself as an amateur but you make such a pro comparison!
Excellent movie, Dave! Thank you for such valuable comparison of the two cameras. It's very helpful. Keep up with the good job. Have a great day!
D800 are quite a bit bigger files. The problem was using a cheap SD card. First off, CF card will be much faster. Always
PLEASE explain this! What brand or type of SD card should I buy? I “thought” they were all the same, except storage size. Is there a difference?? Sorry, very first high-end DLSLR I’ve owned. I feel so dumb. Bought a Nikon D-800E. First digital camera. Owned a Nikon F-3 HP before it.
@@savroof9849 - Excellent choice. You will be fine with a SanDisk Extreme. The D800-E doesn't shoot video nor pictures fast enough to hit a buffer or bottle neck.
Thank you!
I had the Canon 7D and Nikon D300 and was looking for Full frame upgrade.
I went to Canon 5d mk III after this review.
Nice to see how another amature makes a great review of the 2 cameras I was interested in.
My work is in low light conditions, so the choice was obvious for Canon side that you yourself also explained.
And I've never been more pleased with the choice! :-)
Thank you again :-)
Hello Dave, what camera do you use to film your videos? I'm thinking of getting the Canon 700D!
GREAT VIDEO! But since I'm in still photography I'll chose the Nikon. I really think the dynamic range is better on that one. Thank you for the effort. Great video.
Juan Ignacio Weber There is not a huge difference in dynamic range and I believe the more important thing is how quickly you can use the camera. Almost every video comparison I have seen puts the Canon focusing far ahead of the Nikon's in real-world shootouts. The focusing is both faster and more accurate. I'd rather have a more usable and faster camera every time I am out shooting than say "Ooh, I can see a twig in the shadows under a bush more clearly on the Nikon than on the Canon". In other words, big deal! It will be extremely rare for you to lose something "important" in the shot on the Canon which the Nikon would capture, otherwise you need to learn about lighting.
***** I do a lot of street photography and so grabbing focus needs to be swift , accurate and effortless. The same goes for events and even weddings & portraits where you need to nail a fleeting expression or lose it forever. Admittedly, most modern cameras have most of this covered in terms of focus speed anyway.
I think you are exaggerating the dynamic range a little, although the Nikons definitely exhibit less noise in the shadows than Canons. I can honestly say I rarely, if ever, get shots where the shadows have ruined my image. The only shadows I cannot recover are in meaningless parts of the image where it makes no difference. E.g. under the bush in the background, not on the model's face. I never take portraits in such contrasty lighting that I cannot recover shadow details; I shoot from a different angle and/or reposition the model so as not to put myself in that position to begin with (assuming I don't have any lighting aids with me at the time). I would never take a portrait in such unflattering light that the shadows are extremely harsh, unless the shadows were making a shape/pattern and it looked effective. In that case the shadows would be fine as they were.
One other thing - not everyone uses Lightroom. I use Capture One Pro and both the shadow and highlight recovery is superior to that in Lightroom, at least with Canon images. It can bring back a blue sky with defined clouds from what appeared to be a flat white (overexposed) sky and does great shadow recovery without introducing anywhere near the noise Lightroom does with Canon images.
Basically, I do agree there is "an" advantage with Nikon's dynamic range, but certainly not a huge one and not one that allows Nikon users to take images Canon users cannot achieve.
***** Ok, let's look at what you're saying here. You've claimed it affects portraits, so how about you browse the internet for some pro photographer sites and post some links to the portraits which failed using Canon DSLRs.
You're merely regurgitating what all the other Nikon and Sony fanboys say, so back your claims. Where are these failed images? No camera has such a useless DR that it cannot capture a quality portrait, even in uneven light. If the light is so harsh you have to push your camera to its absolute limits in recovering details in a shadow then maybe it's time you did a lighting course?
As for toning down my comments because Canons are not the best cameras in dynamic range, the argument is the exact opposite. I'm saying it is still great enough to achieve high quality professional images. It is you who ASSUMES because the DR is less than that from a Sony sensor that it must be useless for anything. That is kinda like saying a 400lbs man is not heavy because there are 500lbs men out there.
you should've have the same lenses! i am not sure, but i think the nikon lens you had was lower quality then the canon's.
The video would've been more correct if you had used the 24-70 | 2.8f for both cameras.
Good video though! Nikon d800 on the way to my hands!
0:50 said: "If you're an amateur like me..."
Dude, you're so modest, your photo-shooting and videos proved us that you're a PRO! ;)
[clicking the LIKE button]
Dave I have to say thank you. As a fellow amateur this video really helped me understand what to look for when purchasing my first full frame. Straight to the point, candid, and humble review really speaks to the rest of us. Both Canon and Nikon have developed two amazing semi pro cameras in the D800 and 5D Mach 3.
Lol it was defiantly your sd card that made them so slow! I use a 32gb class 10 extreme sd card that i got on sale half price that writes at 80/mbs in my D3200 and I can take continues fast photos until my sd card fill up!
He shot raw files.
god I really love the d800 footage but the low light thing is a problem for me, are they releasing a d850? possibly with improvements to the iso?
great video by the way
Thanks! but later found out that the firmware was out of date. love my D800.
I agree with the sentiment of sticking with what you know. The problem is that if you have invested money in a particular brand of lens, then stick with that brand. Both bodies are brilliant, neither can be said to be better than the other. I use Canon, but I was thinking of getting a Nikon because of the greater pixel count. I think that I will now just upgrade from my 5D2 to a 5D3.
canon for some reason to me seems to bring a better quality.
Contrast yes sharpness not a chance.
You seem like a very likeable guy! great video
I just bought a Mark3 and was concerned when everyone was talking about the new Nikon! I've owned both in the film world, but this is a new age for this old-school guy....After watching your video and having a 7d with a lot of full frame glass, I know that I made the right choice....Thank-you, Dave Great Video and will be watching more....after school is over ( yes went back to school to learn this stuff ) I'll join your site!!!!
By far the most detailed review of the two cameras that i've come across. Thanks Dave. You've got a fan! Tremendous comparison.
The winner is: Nikon D800.
There is no winner...
Nikon D800 number one.
Traingineer
One costs $500 more for less detail, less everything.
Secondary market (used market) for professional lenses and bodies is pretty stable in terms of price. Nothing prevent you to sell your used professional gear from one brand to buy used professional gear from another brand. So your statement has a logical fallacy here.
I don't see where it is better overall unless you are a professional who needs the equipment on a daily basis to put food on the table. I am not in that case and I changed system 3 times in 7 years. Couldn't be happier with my decisions.
When I don't use my system for a month, that gives me plenty of time to switch if something better is out there and that keeps me up to date. That also allows me to compare different system on longer periods of time than this pathetic review does. The day Canon release something better than Nikon, I will switch without hesitation. For now, I'll stick with my D800 :-)
most of your shots are out of focus for the canon
From what I gathered from the video, go with Nikon if you want overall much more detail in your picture due to the megapixels, whereas go with Canon if you want more immediate color correctness and ease of use.
life and it was because i wanted to test the differences between using a camera with and without a flash.
Also having had always been a fan of HDR that function in the Mark III was really interested to see. Its part of the reason why I wanted the camera so much, but because of cost I had to go with the Mark II which unfortunitely doesn't have HDR or video capabilties, but I am really glad the Mark III does. They are two great qualities to have.
Nikon d800 Excellent
why u compare the detail with 22,3 meg to 36,3 meg ....and nikon win ? everybody know that ...its written on the pixel ???
Really like your comparison, sounds unbiased to me. I used Canon for assignments 35 years ago and have only recently in the last couple of years used Nikons. I was happy with Canon at the time and I am happy with Nikon now but, hey ho, there is no such thing as a perfect camera.
Best comparison I've seen, Dave! I was an early adopter of the 5D3 and paid the full price... now it's down below $3k on Amazon! Still it was worth it to have this camera for the past 9 months, but I've learned my lesson and will probably wait next time... if I can stand it !! It's a big step up from the 5D2 no matter what anyone says. Next I want to try Magic Lantern on it.
Great video! It's pronounced "Neeckon" not "Nikon" by the way.
Great share thanks for this You can get the 5d on sale now with the lens kit listed by www.1hds.com/canon5dmarkiiikit for anyone looking for it.
It's pronounced "Nikon" in America. Either way is correct.
GCWaves
It's always pronounced Nikon, everywhere, but Americans and Brits mispronounce it as Naaykon because of the Great Vowel Shift (and often a lot of language cluelessness on top of that).
GathGealaich Nope it's more of an ARROGANCE issue. Americans just believe their way is the best way.
GathGealaich us brits Don't miss pronounce it but Americans do.
Had two D600s that were a nightmare with spitting oil, went through hell to get a refund and upgraded to a D800, at 1000 actuations the same problem, gave up, gone back to Canon and got a 5D Mark III.
To set a custom white balance with Nikon, hold the WB button down while taking a picture of something white, done. Canon, take a picture of something white, in the menu's select set custom white balance, then choose the white picture you took.
Thanks for actually giving a verdict on what you liked better. Often times people are too scared to actually voice an opinion
Canon is a better camera all around. The pixel size on the canon sensor is much better.
jahosaphat 😂😂😂😂😂 you said that 3 years ago hope you're more educated now
John no he is right. Both cams have the same sensor, but Nikon hast more Pixels on it. that means that canon has bigger pixels. Thats what he is saying and its correct. Understand Statements before calling on somebody.
this time Nikon kicks some major ass
This is a great comparison of the cameras. As a note, when I shoot with the D800 I always use a Delkin 1000x card. With that card when you burst and use up all your shots you can start shooting again in a few seconds. If you wait 30 seconds it recycles fully and will let you shoot the full amount of shots again. The 2 minute wait time you are experiencing is because the CF card is slow. This was the same when tethered to an SSD via USB 3.0 (macbook air).
This video holds up very well - I just find it weird how this very clearly a shootout of their video performance, but all your disclaimers referred to your experience level, not your preference between photo and video. As a stills photographer I'd pick the Nikon, but I cannot deny that the Canon looks better with its colors here.
Incredible video, you kept me guessing which one you were going to choose until the very end. Very well done and truly unbiased!
Terrific video! Thanks for posting this, I can see it was a great deal of work. I've seen many of these 800 vs 5d videos, and I'll have to say this is the best in my opinion. Thanks again.
Your humility is so very refreshing; an honest man is hard to find.
I've been following you since almost day one and this must be one of your best reviews ever! Always that nice vibe. Always a pleasure watching. Thank you for sharing this with us. Your stuff is as cool as ecologically grown speaker domes!
I'm a Nikon shooter and may I say this was a great review of both brands. I really like your style and you really did look at areas other reviewers leave out. Well done!
Look forward to more from you.
I think I'd make it a good point that the Nikon doesn't support Magic Lantern. I'm not too sure how many DSLR video guys use Magic Lantern, but it's the best tool I've ever used for my camera, and it has greatly improved my video.
I still shoot with a D800, and I don't have color balance problems. But I use auto white balance only in situations where there are multiple light types. Also, I shoot a lot of HDR, and mine from my D800 blend together in ON1 or Photoshop without a problem. I think the Nikon white balance issue is yours. I don't have trouble with my D800, except that the open shade mode tends to be a little blue, but not bad. And, that can be adjusted or easily fixed in post. You missed on the available light issue. The D800 does as well or better than the canon if it's set correctly. But then, you don't earn you living with cameras, so you don't use them as much. There is a learning curve with the D800, but it's not too steep.
Hi Dave, I am so glad that I clicked the link on this video. By far the best side by side comparison review I've watched so far. Like you, I am amateur photographer and currently own D7000 and hope that some time in the future upgrade to full frame. I will be checking all of yours reviews, because you have such a great calm and informative style allowing us watchers to absorb all the info you are presenting. Excellent review. I hope you'll enjoy your new camera.
Absolutely THE best review ever on youtube. Thank you so much for all the effort you've put in this.
You say your not an expert, but you have more knowledge than 90% of people who say there experts. Good job on comparisons
To me, it comes down to which brand you prefer, and what camera meets your specific needs. I don't like people saying one is better than the other, because they're both fantastic bodies, the 5D might work better for one person, but the D800 might work better for someone else.
i like your video style a lot!! you explain it in a way 98% of the viewers understand what your are talking of !! thats what makes your reviews so good.. my too I'm not a pro in after FX and all these photoshop programms but I think most of us weren't..for normal people with a 9 to 5 job ,married with children it is hard to stay up to date with all these new technologies. its so time consuming!!
This is probably the best comparison movie I have seen. I bought mkiii for the same reason. Thank you
Here we are in 2018 and I’m looking at the 5D3 for landscape photography. Still a viable solution.
I just started watching your videos and I'm disappointed I didn't start sooner. Keep up the good work, very informative stuff.
Thank you Dave for your time. Awesome comparison and description between those cameras. Thank you!
Thanks Dave. This is definitely the best camera review I've ever watched on youtube!
Thanks for taking the time to make this video! I can't thank you enough. If I were in the US I'd get a camera directly from your links!
This is the best comparison video ive ever seen. Thank you so much for all the effort! Great work!
Awesome video! Must be I'm Colorado. I recognized a lot of the shots! Love the cinematography that you do! From one indie film maker to another , great work
I agree with him... Canon is more of a beginner camera and Nikon is more for the pros. Ian's for those who are just getting into photography, you don't need a big expensive camera. I use a canon powershot sd1200is and it works just fine for what I do...
I've found the conclusion to your video a bit of a relieve Dave, as I have ordered my MkIII yesterday! I, too, am an amature/hobbyist photographer... but sharpness for me is key. I probably would have chosen the D800 if it wasn't for my Canon glass, but, in addition to sharpness, low light performance is very important and there is where I'm very excited about the 5D.
Incidentally, my buddy bought the D800 and he's happy with it, but admitted to me that if it wasn't for his Nikor lenses...
What an outstanding comparison, thanks for investing the time to do this!
I plan on it, but it might be awhile, I am busy with other projects right now.
This is the best camera review I have ever seen.
Thanks Dave for your great review on both cameras. You comparison it's so clear and honest.
Another great review as usual. I have a Nikon D7000 which I love and I'm really interested in going full frame to do more videography. It looks like I'm tending towards to Canon at the moment as I'm hearing a lot of good things about it. The production quality of your videos never ceases to amaze me. It totally blows my mind when you say you're an amateur, you're only an amateur because you're not doing it full-time not because you're not good enough!
If you are still choosing between Nikon D800 and Canon 5D just buy Sony A7S. The cine look is amazing on Sony and it is far better in low light
Fantastic comparison video! It taught me more than any other video regarding these cameras.
My canon mark 3 just came in this morning. I haven't put it down. I also had a chance to play with a d800 and your review is exactly the issues my friends and I had. I feel like d800 is made for those big landscape photos. While the Mark iii is like having a swiss-army knife. I think Canon knew not to over kill the this camera with pixels. Making it more handy is almost any situation. Check out my video test. I highly recommend the 28mm 1.8. Thanks for this video and great work!
I think the Canon 5D NK3 is just the best Full Frame camera so far in 2016, but Canon may come up with a new 5D MK4, who knows
I have heard the shoot at full resolution, then convert the images to 8MP. The program they are using to check the features of the sensor works at 8 MP. More MP would mean better image when downscaled. I am not 100% certain, as I haven't spoken to anyone at Dxo, but it makes sense.
How can you call yourself an amateur, you're very knowledgeable, fantastic work!
The mode dial lock release button is great for video productions where you have multiple cameras and camera men as the mode dial would frequently get accidentaly shifted in that environment with older Canon DSLR models.
Best comparison I have seen for a long time, well done !
cheers,
Mark
Congratulations Drumat, I really enjoy your videos, you cover all the important topics and are just an enthusiast photo/video maker like most of us. Keep them coming, and thanks a lot :)
The video was obviously a tremendous amount of work and it was greatly appreciated. Thanks.
@twistedlogic.....BTW the same CANNOT b said about canon simply because they don't make a 36 megapixel camera, also the d800 is aimed at studio/landscape.... medium format quality images are produced.
Jared is a businessman and marketer, you can't take his reviews too seriously
But on a more relevant note, the D800 is the best still camera I've ever used. People who complain about it and the ISO clearly don't know how to handle the camera in that situation. D800's dynamic range is unmatched.
Hi Dave, I'm impressed with your videos, they are very well done and I can see how much thought and effort you've put into these. Just a note about why Canon has a lock button on the mode dial. It has a tendency to change quite easily if the camera is slung over your shoulder on the strap when it rubs agains your body. Lots of people use the Black Rapid straps, same thing when the sit down, have it rub against a leg, chair arm, etc. I am a run-gun shooter and found bringing up my camera to suddenly have to contend with a different mode than I thought I was in to make me miss shots and the critical moments. I had a 5D mark II and had it upgraded to the locking style dial and this worked better for me. I love this feature on the 5D Mark III. reliability, predictability
Great video. But i noticed that you focused too much on Video performance of both cameras which are not the concern of many users.
Same here. It's so rare that I use my D7000 for video (it works great though), but I really would rather have that money put towards a better focusing system or a longer lasting shutter.
Thanks Dave you got the message loud and clear in HD Colour!! what a perfect comparison. Keep them coming
Thanks Dave, very informative. I like the way you presenting your video, the way you talk not to fast and not to slow, the still photo and the video .... I believe you are not an amateur .... you are the master. Once again thank you.
Just so everyone knows, the D800 in high ISO's is the same if not better than the 5DMk3 if you grade the blacks. Notice the black levels rise to blue and the grain you see is in the blue. Grade the blue to black and you'll be amazed!!