TimeStamps here: 00:00 💰 Faceless RUclips channels profit via RUclips automation. 02:45 🤔 Fair use allows transformative content with added value. 06:09 📚 Be cautious with copyrighted sources, avoid strict corporations. 10:04 ⏳ Amount of content used matters; avoid using significant portions. 11:13 💼 Avoid replacing or harming the copyright holder's market within fair use.
"the US court system decides what is fair use" HAHAHAHAHA 🤣 Nice joke! as if ALL the violations & wrong strikes YT has done came from "us court system". This guy doesn't know what he's talking about or he's purposfeully misguiding people
Wait until you get a copyright claim by a huge mega corp holding company claiming your completely original generative work is a copy of a 12 year old instrumental of one of their artists they dropped the ball promoting (27 YT views, one FB like and a plucked Twitter bird in 12 years in this case). You’re not going to be a fan of videos like this one outlining tips on how to target the least likely to have a legal defence department.
@@gen-amb yea for this reason I don't use music. Man music is a huge trouble area. You will never know when you might get trouble. Or prefer to use oher creator's music with license.
People on the tiktok shop are REALLY bad about it. Selling merch of licensed characters and there was several people who would turn fanfiction into hard cover books and selling them even tho it's pretty common knowledge that you can't sell fanfiction
I mean it kinda depends on perspective right? If you truly believe that people should be able to create content using footage from external sources, then it's not really about taking from those who won't fight back, but rather not taking from those that will knock you out and drown you in legal waters where you can't fight back at all.
@@PixelTheory That's not a legitimate perspective. You are able to use external sources as long as you license those sources. Some of those licenses cost money, some don't. When you actively steal from someone else, it's not about drowning you in "legal waters where you can't fight back," it's about asserting THEIR legal right to THEIR content, which you actively stole.
Commentary and criticism of news stories and interviews etc is very important part of fair use as it doesn't let the news organisation control the narrative.
I think it's much easier having a faceless channel if somebody is a shy person. I am a bit like that so starting a personal channel was not an option for me. But with faceless channel everything is easier. I can focus on my content without being judged on my looks, voice, body, etc... (I can also recommend using some tools like Famester here and there, as it works best with this type of channel).
"the US court system decides what is fair use" HAHAHAHAHA 🤣 Nice joke! as if ALL the violations & wrong strikes YT has done came from "us court system". This guy doesn't know what he's talking about or he's purposfeully misguiding people
Faceless channels are easier to manageand to run for everybody though the Shy forks like me are advantaged. I run one faceless Mental health channel that doing Great.👊🏼👊🏼
@@TINABLESS88 I understood it completely, thanks. And a key message was, one way to get away with copyright theft is if your victim is too poor to sue in the US courts.
@@TINABLESS88 Are you still going on about this? Since you've been so rudely condescending - I worked in publishing for 10 years and am very familiar with copyright law. But if you think it's fine to steal other people's work because you can get away with it then I've no more to say to you.
I like seeing film clips interspersed into an original piece, usually in the form of a reaction, a gasp, a sigh, a laugh. Always helps with the pacing of a piece
I'm not taking a side here whether it's good or bad to "transform" other's content. There are a whollllllle lotta people out there doing this now, so that's another conversation. That being said, there is a lot of very, very good & valuable (& common sense) info here. Thanks a ton! Great job!
Yea it all depends on what are you making. Prime Example of transformative content is Reaction channels. For other channels like science channel or some channels like education or explaintion type they generally use few seconds clip for refference purpose.
Not really into making a faceless channel, but these tips are very useful to help getting some clips into podcasts and avoiding serious copyright issues.
That's the way to do it. Some good stuff there! Subscribed. Only on one or two vids have I used external footage - and I've got written permission for that - and one coming in a few weeks with press released copyright free content. Might not be good stuff from me, but everything film/video and even 90% of the music is done by myself.
One of the hardest parts of starting a RUclips channel must be the patience required. I only started 2 weeks ago and it feels like forever without gaining any subs or views.
@@Earn_YourWayNot really. I just saw a channel, a year old with around 50 videos. So so quality I'd say, and double digit views in 1 year. It depends on quality and believe me or not, luck.
my friend had a channel like yours, in month 2 or 3 he got millions of views and over 3000 subs but when he applied for YT partnership... REJECTED for not adding enough value to the copyrighted content. If you cant do EVERYTHING this guy has said, EXTREME edits while using individual's content etc etc, then you have a problem come monetization time. Good luck though.
So recap: Steal “Transform” Only steal from people who can’t stop you This is the dumbest and most exploitative way you can make content other than just putting your face next to a video and saying nothing (cough cough Sssniperwolf)
I follow Noah on Twitter, and one thing that bothers me in these videos is that he never mentioned a case where he lost a buch of channels linked to the same gmail account, because of copyright strikes and lost about 20 000$ from ad revenue a month if I remember correctly. (He has a Twitter thread about it). The way he avoids the risk now is with putting the high risk content on one gmail account, and lower risk content on other accounts, so if he losses some of them, it's less of a problem. It's definitely an interesting topic. Not sure where Google stands with having multiple Ad sense accounts though, I think you can only have one connected to your own name? You could always open more from your family members and stuff but this whole topic is a bit shady and people should definitely be careful and decent if doing this...
Google told me in 2018 that you can have one Adsense Channel "per business entity". At the level he is at I'm guessing that there is more than one LLC, which would make sense.
@noahmorris8511they really should have left that in, super important to know both the good sides and the bad with real examples. Glad you were transparent about that as well :)
@MysterryPlayer na, I don't think so, I increased my subscribers by 40 percent and viewing time by over 200 percent in the last 28 days, I don't think the market is oversaturated, you just need to always try to Improve
I hada situation recently where I was using some music from a game in one of my videos. The developers are very cool with people doing this on RUclips (they've literally said this), it doesn't get flagged by the Content ID system and they don't make copyright claims. But I used a certain piece of their music that did get flagged by Content ID. I was confused, and it turned out that it got flagged by another company that I guess represents independent music artists or something like that. Turns out some guy had remixed the game's music into his song, causing the Content ID to flag it as owned by him. I tried to appeal it but, of course, RUclips just told me that the guy claims it's his and, as I'm not the owner of the music either, I can't really go further and say 'well, no it's not owned by him.' Just kind of sucks that the developers let people use their music and you've got a$$holes remixing it into their songs that are then copyrighted which prevent other people from using it themselves like they did.
Did you email the Game Developers about it all? Also say they need to do a basic licence to stop someone doing this. The thing is.. You are using the original not their remix. I suppose someone could get their remix and remix it again and then copyright them...
For all of you ripping on the person who issued the claim, they paid to use that source material. They have a right to defend their use of it the same as any copyright holder.
@@mySeaPrince_ I considered it but I was concerned that they wouldn't know how to handle the situation or what they could do (the claim is on my video after all, not theirs, meaning the option to appeal is only available to me, even though it's their music) and was concerned they might think the only response is to begin actively claiming and flagging all their music themselves to ensure no one else does, resulting in the same problem but worse. I might still do it though, I'm not sure. I'll continue to look into it.
I will honestly say. Listen to anything these channels tell you with a grain of salt. They prey off of those who can’t seem to break out on RUclips. And they’ll continuously drive you away from creating what you wanted to.
I like your comment, !!! I DON'T WANT TO DRIVE AWAY OF MY CREATIVITY. !!! Desperation and lack of honesty with our self, fear to fail, etc., etc., etc., Most of the time, could be, we want someone guide us to success, but then we need to think, WHY ? I can not be successful like him, ? MAY BE FEAR. Don't fear failure, fear all the opportunity's you lose because your fear and insecurities and LET YOUR CREATIVITY SHOW YOU THAT YOU KNOW THAT EVERYTHING IS POSSIBLE, JUST DO IT,................YOU WILL SUCCED. Must of the time we forget how powerful our BRAIN AND UNIVERS ARE AND THAT YOU CAN MANIFEST, WITH YOUR ACTIONS AND DESIRES, !!!! WHEREVER YOU WANT. !!!!
"The impact" on the Copyright holder. It's obviously detrimental. We see non stop these thieving channels get waaay more views than the original. That's facts. And so in that case the original uploader should be entitled to a portion of revenue. I don't understand why this whole system is so complicated. There's such an easy fix to all of this. The ORIGINAL owner or uploader should always be getting some fixed portion of any works remade. whether its 1% or 5% or an amount we could eventually all agree on. I don't see how that's difficult to register with content id? But no....let's rather let thieves steal literally thousands from creators or uploaders that aren't even monetized in the first place. SMH....the whole system is broken
Transformative is part of the key. Also, if your faceless video takes away any reason to watch the original content, you're heading for a confrontation.
Hi there - great job on this video!! It is hard to get the truth sometimes - I have always felt that with any process, people try to beat the system and potentially ruin for it for other creators. You help us and it is appreciated. In my own businesses I was fair and honest.
This guy is literally trying to beat the system and trying to squirm away from copywrite laws. Another poster even said he has lost a ton of channels due to copywrite strikes.
He really creates exciting stories from those footages. He put his efforts in it. He deserves the outcome. People shouldn't be so strict like that. Thanks for sharing, Noah
The original rightsholder (or their local subsidiary) could potentially sue you outside of the RUclips ecosystem under the law of the country you come from. It's unlikely, as they will probably just have the video deleted and move on, but they could sue you for copyright infringement.
Ah yes, the Dark Arts....a.k.a. theft. As a small creator who is working his butt off to get to 1000 subscribers, I can't help but think it will be much more rewarding to find success without stealing from other creators.
Nice video as always, but sorry Rob, this is not the first time I heard strange noises (mic problem), try to fix it. Am I the only one who noticed this?)
This video does not discourage stealing from other youtube creators, and does not encourage using footage fairly, instead telling people how not to "get caught". I do not like the vibes here
Agreed. Bad vibes from VidIQ. Was considering paying for VidIQ. Your point is well taken about their true colours here given this comes across like cheerleading for copyright abusers. Good video nonetheless though. Better to know. When you’ve had a copyright claim placed clearly by analysis on your entirely original work multiple times by huge mega holding companies long enough to observe that they actually have a market in trading copyright claims, you will be even less impressed by the moral position on theft that VidIQ has apparently decided to take here about how to sneak away with ill gotten gains in your career as another IP appropriation abuser. The key purpose of “Fair Use” under the U.S. copyright Act of 1976 ushered right in and placed in the seat of highest honour in this video as “a legal doctrine” without the slightest challenge by VidIQ in this piece (presumably because that would tend to upset the soothing pro-theft narrative and negatively impact AVD in this video) is to identify evidence, not to provide meme cred as B-roll in any random scheme uploaded. Big companies have done this (to me for one example) since many years ago. Calling the recipe “faceless” doesn’t ennoble it or change the ingredients list. And VidIQ is apparently working hard now to spread the exact knowledge of precisely how you too, kids, can become a successful internet pickpocket. Start out by choosing targets well: no big companies with legal departments! You want to stick with DEFENCELESS targets. But careful you don’t do anything wrong while you’re pickpocketing. Just because there’s a way to get away with it doesn’t make it right.
I do very transformative and educational music analysis videos. The bulk of my content is listening to a piece of music, stopping often to reflect and breakdown what is happening composiontally and rewind to go over again. This process is repeated over and over throughout the piece. 95% of my uploads are claimed. I have made sure to stay very true to transformative and educational content my entire time on RUclips. I dispute most of the claims and lose most of the claims. The rejection notice is almost immediatly. I think in a year and a half of disuputes I have won maybe 7 total and that was primarily because they didnt respond within the 30 day window. I was REALLY hoping this video would go over the process of when you DO get claimed and how he handles disputing and IF he issues an appeal after the dispute. Thanks for the video!
Really interesting. the whole system is a bit ridiculous. It would be so much better if they can just calculate the royalty due to the content creator and send it to them instead. Like they do with radio. Any licensed broadcaster can play your song and you just get a payment. Embed the watermark system into the video editing apps so that the metatagged revenue share breakdown is uploaded along with the video, everyone can use everything and everyone gets their share. So if your video has 30 secs of someone else's song, and its the only thing playing, then they get 30 secs worth of the $$$. Just an idea but I hope something like this would happen in future.
No offence to VidIQ but this is by far the most value I have learned about content creation and fair use then I have learned in the 15 years i've been on RUclips. THANK YOU , I had one channel hit well a few years back but was nailed with copyright I couldn't understand the fair use policy it killed my channel immediately . This was priceless yet so valuable Yeah ty to the next generation , yall helping us foggies understand. Breakin the barriers for us all LOVE THIS !
Would definitely contact youtube support. I have 6k watch hours and not even 600 subscribers and already have monetized channel memberships. Might be an issue with youtube u need to sort out
Sorry to hear. I began making those same type of shorts as you, but took them all off my channel after a week as I figured out they were low-value and not what I wanted to represent me.
@@ThoughtfulAl ya, better to figure it out that sooner than later I guess I know I just started like 1 week or so ago, but didn't get why all of a sudden the views went to straight 0 😅 hope your channel is doing good now
I think some people are very mistaken about what 'public domain' means when it comes to copyright. Just because it's on the internet, or even published on a site that claims it is 'copyright free' does not mean something is 'public domain, thus copyright free. To be public domain a piece of content must indeed be copyright free, and it isn't unless expressly stated as so by the creator, or owner of the copyright, and the owner of the content isn't always the owner of the copyright. This is why, as a commission artist, I originally started taking my own reference photos. I then owned the copyright on the photos, and the art.
Exactly, people cannot be bothered to actually search out the CC license (and double check to make sure that someone hasn't lifted it then put it out under CC themselves.) It's too much hard work. People find your angle too much hard work, going and taking your own photographs. It's an angle I always admire. When I began in Motorsport journalism I found CC images were usually too poor quality (shots of F1 races from the 70s aren't generally good for publishing!) Modern CC shots from motor races taken by fans actually broke the condition of entry if used even editorially - rendering them unusable (even if rights holder don't enforce - not worth the risk) and press release images were very limited - eventually went through the process gain accreditation to do it properly myself. Life would be so much easier if I could just lift content......
@@touringcarmagazine Just given you a subscribe since both my son and I are rallying fans, but will watch track racing too. I used to watch F1, but stopped some time ago when Bernie sold the UK out on the live races. Used to go and watch a friend track race, so I've tried getting shots/footage of races. It's not easy!
Well according to law public domain means usually the owner Donated it for free or the copyright has expired. For books its usually till the authors death. And for music- its till 50 uears after owners death. Well for photos its 70 years after owners death. Also Copyright free photos or Videos which one usually get they are not in public domain but Technically in Creative commons license but they don't usually bother to ask
I thought about it but because i do not want copyright strikes or issues,i decided to film my videos myself and hopefully I'm doing well showing my FACE 😊
Informative. I think the best way to ethically and legally do this is to act like a reputable news network. Treat it like such by giving credit and adding value! The only way to avoid is to strictly not use anyones videos or copyrighted stuff.
Under US law there is no “legal doctrine called fair use” as this foreign national kid lectured about US law. There is the Copyright act of 1976 which name was not changed to “the Fair Use Law” by Wikipedia despite the Wikipedia page title. They don’t arbitrarily alter half century old legislation by the results of X Polling that say ‘theft should now be a right, but only for ME.” Fair use is not a “legal doctrine” and even if it were a legal doctrine that doesn’t override the law, no matter who wants it to. Fair use refers to an exception that can be allowed by a judge on a per case basis. That it is often allowed is not determinative. Any judge can refuse to consider what you’ve done to fall under the fair use exception. Like if you’re not the NYT for example, using an unauthorized screen grab in a story. Then you’re just another thief. There is no right justified as “fair use” for anyone to steal. This “transformative” test is now what’s being determined in cases like Getty Images vs Dall-E. Fair use has become a defence strategy. If your lawyer says “we’re going to plead ‘fair use’” that’s because he knows you will just look like a thief to the judge. If you buy a fancy enough AI hedge trimmer (or you do it by hand) that it “transforms” the part of your neighbour’s hedge facing you to resemble Mt. Rushmore, does that mean a Judge will then move your neighbour’s property line away from you award some of your property to your neighbour? Because that’s what all these “transformative” people are saying should happen. ‘I copy pasta’d a special prompt so that should give me some legal rights in your property.’ I don’t think so, Tim. There’s a LOT of Silicon Valley money whining to judges about this but under law I personally don’t think it’s going to work over the long term. Because eventually a case will go to the US Supreme Court and no Supreme Court is going to say “ownership is only 1% of the law.” You can diminutize what I’m sayings by cordoning it off as “opinion” but then your opinion is going to change when somebody like this man steals your original content from you. Opinions can invert based on experience. Opinions can also be objectively right wrong. Calling something an opinion doesn’t magically change the moral nature of that thing from objective to subjective in nature.
I'm not sure what VidIQ's intention is with this video. But it strengthens my resolve to not watch any videos on channels of this type. If they're not monetized and just sharing what is actually allowed to be shared, that's one thing. But to give counsel on how to skirt the laws and reduce your risk of getting caught, well, it just proves this guy's morals.
@@localtravelcouplejams what I mean is: Are creators protected from copyright infringement if Remix Options are turned on. I received a Strike from a content owner after following the Remix Option that was operational. It was a bait & switch that cost me a Strike & 90 days of probation. I’m suffering from a case of the “ Remix🌪️Twisties “.
How can copyright law apply to peoples personal videos?? Like if they don’t want you to use it that’s different then like Disney suing you for someone’s video of their family at Disney world.
So i am getting copyright claims on videos .live performances . Some are vintage videos of a band i was . We recorded these songs in the 90s. should i dispute these ? Also there are lots of channels that uploaded songs i recorded and wrote for my band from the 70s on RUclips . I would rather them be exclusively on my channel to at least drive traffic . What to do ? So difficult to make money as a musician these days .
i share your frustration.. my other channel does cover versions in a different language, and YT says there's no added value, despite having a few videoa with tons of likes n positive comments. yet there are lyric channels being monetised, where they just copy n paste the words of a song.. 😒
How can you use clips in your videos without worrying about whether or not theyll CR you? ex. them using real life footage of people in court ( court case videos ) or whether motivational videos where they'll pull different scenes in movies/shows exc. and being able to use them...
Does text referring to the source make any difference? A way of showing you are acknowledging the original creator and not just trying to steal content? Does it help your argument for fair use or is it just a waste of time?
I was using common creative licenced videos for one of my channels, but the content under that licence is often old and of low quality. This is useful information.
Sometimes it's really hard to find right type of content. This thing happened specially for education, explaining , science type channels. I also struggle many times to find the right video but sometimes we were not able to do.
So can you get copyrighted if you want to share a lil clip of a celeb in a show/movie with a piece of work you made of them? Or is it better to share a user generated content/fan clip of the celeb. with your piece of work?? And can you share a fan clip from youtube or FB too?
But RUclips has no clue what Transformative means and/or what/how Fair Use is or how it works. I upload podcasts I co-host, and most of the time it claims copyright issue as our primary host uses some intro/outro music _over which he speaks,_ transforming it from Just Music to opening/closing themes with narration. I've not tried to monetize the channel due to these non-strike level copyright issues RUclips clearly doesn't/won't understand...
what about music?🤔 for instance, if i only use 90seconds of a song, speed it up and change the lyrics to something completely different from the songs lyrics?
@VidIQ Do you still get paid with personal account? Or is it only brand youtube accounts now? And what about kid channels? My kids have a channel but debating if they should switch to brand or not
I created a voiceover and edit for a small clip from an old novela, and it was still copyrighted claim because of a 2 second tune. 🤣 how do I go about creating educational videos if I can’t show examples
Years ago I had an Internet cafe in Bucharest -Romania. Games, OS software was licensed or open sources. One day, we had a guy for Romanian Copyright Association who come to check if we are respecting the law, and we bought OS and software. But we put music all the time there. An online radio. And the guy told us we have to pay for that. It wasn't a penality. is was a contract between our company and Romanian Copyright Association - entitled to collect that money and distribute to authors. Is was something realy cheap like 10 or 20 dollars for one year. After that, the guy told us: "I am a musician and I know this copyright is just a trend. Also less that 30% of that money are going back tu creators" I will be happy to use YT music and pay for it if that money are going 90% to the creator. Unfortunately is not like that.
I just really don't buy this. I constantly see videos with essentially no value being added, and they get away with it nonstop. It'll be literally an entire video from someone else, but then they add a meme image, and yay it's a new video? Or they'll have that stupid male AI voice that's everywhere just describe what's happening in the video, and somehow that's adding more context than the video it's describing? I still don't get how they're getting away with this, because these people are not adding more content to the video than what they've stolen and reuploaded.
My channel is less than a year old and tiny. It is on Homesteading - in Australia. I film all my own footage. But sometimes I want to put out a video, that is going to say require a seasonal shot of something - lets say for instance carrots being harvested by hand, or planting a tomato. If I can find a snippet a carrot being pulled up, (less than 3-5 seconds!) can I use it if I am giving a commentary over the top of the images? I am very new to all of this and was tech phobic 12months ago, so everything about video creation is a steep learning curve....
Here's something I will tell from my over 10+ channels over 13 years experience here in YT which is also something I discussed with other content creators and it's not even mentioned or hinted once here, in this video or others talking about this topic. - No matter what "outsource content" you use, once your channel gain repercussion and certain amount of numbers starting to make you some interesting money.. you will be targeted by companies as individuals that will run a bot or manual check all your channel listing all possible "clips, memes, sounds, music" you may have used and start to massive report your videos but not to take down your channel but to take away your monetization. - There were cases, that even if you create your own visual meme, emote or whatever, a company or individual may take that visual and register it's copyright then copy strike all your YT videos claiming ownership over that single element and YT will not help you but give all monetization to that shady company or individual. - Just be aware, whatever content you do here on RUclips, if you get lucky enough to make love with the algorithm and grow your numbers into millions, you will run into this kind of problems and will be forced to hire lawyers and mentally prepare yourself for an infinite fight in this issue.
Question about narration. I narrate classic ghost stories - out of copyright - and write my own, then I add sound effects & artwork, but there are very large channels that upload narrations of in-copyright stories/books with no sound effects or original artwork. Does simply narrating something add sufficient value?
I don’t believe this is a good idea. The channels that do this, just haven’t been caught yet. Think about it. If I found a channel that just narrated Stephen King books, then I wouldn’t have to buy King’s books or audio books. I’d just listen to them for free on RUclips. The RUclipsr would basically be stealing money away from the original creator.
I miss the old RUclips, the site with real videos made my real people who actually shared knowledge. This new RUclips is an AI-generated nightmare, just thousands of lazy, talentless hacks re-posting millions of garbage videos that say nothing.
I noticed on my channel that videos created by me with Creative Commons footages don't get recommended well. Adding value through transformation is quite subjective. Another thing I noticed is if I pay licenses for songs they keep copyright claims for long before clearance. during this time they get some money probably. What happens if I delete a video with a copyright claim? I think is better to delete after clearance. What do you guys think?
@@RandomButBeautiful yes. Using copyrighted footage under fair rule might result in you sharing the income produced by the video with the copyright owner as well. He lets use the footage but claims a part of the income. Everything is quite tricky. The best is you have your own footage.
My channel is a gaming channel, and I don't show my face in my videos, but I have recently started using my voice in videos that are not live streams. I haven't been live streaming for very long either. I started live streaming at least weekly in June this year. That is the first time I ever did a voice reveal since silent live streams wouldn't do very good right? And then I decided to start using my voice in regular videos too (at least for some of them). Before I started using my voice I'd always get background music from the Audio Library to avoid issues with copyright. When I use my voice I don't have to really worry about picking music since I want the main audio to be my voice. I do usually still have background music at a very low volume in a separate audio track than my voice is so that there's not just silence in the seconds when I am taking a breath, reached end of a sentence, etc.
TimeStamps here:
00:00 💰 Faceless RUclips channels profit via RUclips automation.
02:45 🤔 Fair use allows transformative content with added value.
06:09 📚 Be cautious with copyrighted sources, avoid strict corporations.
10:04 ⏳ Amount of content used matters; avoid using significant portions.
11:13 💼 Avoid replacing or harming the copyright holder's market within fair use.
"the US court system decides what is fair use" HAHAHAHAHA 🤣 Nice joke! as if ALL the violations & wrong strikes YT has done came from "us court system". This guy doesn't know what he's talking about or he's purposfeully misguiding people
yes, it has no idea what he is talking@@HassanSanem
It's weird how for some people they have the audacity to take someone's content and be like "why is it taken down?"
Welcome to twenty-first century entitlement
Wait until you get a copyright claim by a huge mega corp holding company claiming your completely original generative work is a copy of a 12 year old instrumental of one of their artists they dropped the ball promoting (27 YT views, one FB like and a plucked Twitter bird in 12 years in this case). You’re not going to be a fan of videos like this one outlining tips on how to target the least likely to have a legal defence department.
@@gen-amb yea for this reason I don't use music. Man music is a huge trouble area. You will never know when you might get trouble. Or prefer to use oher creator's music with license.
People on the tiktok shop are REALLY bad about it. Selling merch of licensed characters and there was several people who would turn fanfiction into hard cover books and selling them even tho it's pretty common knowledge that you can't sell fanfiction
It’s only asked because others are making millions doing the very thing your video is getting taken down for…
His biggest tip is essentially "Take from people who can't fight back". Tells you everything you need to know about the legitimacy of his "content".
Heck yeah! Because who gives a rat's behind about being original or creative?
That's exactly what I got from this. Its so messed up 😢
I mean it kinda depends on perspective right? If you truly believe that people should be able to create content using footage from external sources, then it's not really about taking from those who won't fight back, but rather not taking from those that will knock you out and drown you in legal waters where you can't fight back at all.
Its called creative leveraging.
@@PixelTheory That's not a legitimate perspective. You are able to use external sources as long as you license those sources. Some of those licenses cost money, some don't. When you actively steal from someone else, it's not about drowning you in "legal waters where you can't fight back," it's about asserting THEIR legal right to THEIR content, which you actively stole.
Commentary and criticism of news stories and interviews etc is very important part of fair use as it doesn't let the news organisation control the narrative.
I think it's much easier having a faceless channel if somebody is a shy person. I am a bit like that so starting a personal channel was not an option for me. But with faceless channel everything is easier. I can focus on my content without being judged on my looks, voice, body, etc... (I can also recommend using some tools like Famester here and there, as it works best with this type of channel).
Famester is really good service, I am using it for six months with no issues so far.
"the US court system decides what is fair use" HAHAHAHAHA 🤣 Nice joke! as if ALL the violations & wrong strikes YT has done came from "us court system". This guy doesn't know what he's talking about or he's purposfeully misguiding people
@@HassanSanemthat is so stupid
Faceless channels are easier to manageand to run for everybody though the Shy forks like me are advantaged.
I run one faceless Mental health channel that doing Great.👊🏼👊🏼
@@HassanSanem wrong you can run faceless channels. his is not misguiding lol
Pretty disappointed that Vidiq is pushing this guy saying stealing from smaller channels makes it ok.
Guess u missed the whole point of the video. Tv programs been doing this for ages. All material being original is not always realistic.
@@TINABLESS88 I understood it completely, thanks. And a key message was, one way to get away with copyright theft is if your victim is too poor to sue in the US courts.
@@GrandThriftAutoYou clearly need to educate yourself on Copyright Infringement. Not everything is a violation.
@@TINABLESS88 Are you still going on about this? Since you've been so rudely condescending - I worked in publishing for 10 years and am very familiar with copyright law. But if you think it's fine to steal other people's work because you can get away with it then I've no more to say to you.
Yeah that’s just wrong
I like seeing film clips interspersed into an original piece, usually in the form of a reaction, a gasp, a sigh, a laugh. Always helps with the pacing of a piece
sounds really intellectual. you wouldn't want to overwhelm your attention spam without proper pacing you goldfish.
My channel is pure hobby and does not generate money for me. Still, I was exited to see if channels like mine was mentioned in this context.
Thx for sharing. I really like your channel. But then again, we share same taste in movies it seems
Hi. Would you share why your channel is not monetized, despite having good amount of subscribers?
Yeah why... Your channel is not monetized despite the subscribers and the views??????
I'm not taking a side here whether it's good or bad to "transform" other's content. There are a whollllllle lotta people out there doing this now, so that's another conversation. That being said, there is a lot of very, very good & valuable (& common sense) info here. Thanks a ton! Great job!
Yea it all depends on what are you making. Prime Example of transformative content is Reaction channels. For other channels like science channel or some channels like education or explaintion type they generally use few seconds clip for refference purpose.
Not really into making a faceless channel, but these tips are very useful to help getting some clips into podcasts and avoiding serious copyright issues.
To avoid all this nonsense, I just film my own videos.
Unless you are doing talking head videos it may not always be possible to get all your own footage.
That's a way:)
Yeah this is more practical if you have a team doing it.
That's the way to do it. Some good stuff there!
Subscribed.
Only on one or two vids have I used external footage - and I've got written permission for that - and one coming in a few weeks with press released copyright free content.
Might not be good stuff from me, but everything film/video and even 90% of the music is done by myself.
100%
One of the hardest parts of starting a RUclips channel must be the patience required. I only started 2 weeks ago and it feels like forever without gaining any subs or views.
@@Earn_YourWayNot really. I just saw a channel, a year old with around 50 videos. So so quality I'd say, and double digit views in 1 year. It depends on quality and believe me or not, luck.
It could be up to months or years without any results, we should be prepared for that.
Indeed, i feel the same
my friend had a channel like yours, in month 2 or 3 he got millions of views and over 3000 subs but when he applied for YT partnership... REJECTED for not adding enough value to the copyrighted content.
If you cant do EVERYTHING this guy has said, EXTREME edits while using individual's content etc etc, then you have a problem come monetization time.
Good luck though.
Two weeks..... And you're already frustrated at having no progress..... Jesus. Ha
So recap:
Steal
“Transform”
Only steal from people who can’t stop you
This is the dumbest and most exploitative way you can make content other than just putting your face next to a video and saying nothing (cough cough Sssniperwolf)
I follow Noah on Twitter, and one thing that bothers me in these videos is that he never mentioned a case where he lost a buch of channels linked to the same gmail account, because of copyright strikes and lost about 20 000$ from ad revenue a month if I remember correctly. (He has a Twitter thread about it). The way he avoids the risk now is with putting the high risk content on one gmail account, and lower risk content on other accounts, so if he losses some of them, it's less of a problem.
It's definitely an interesting topic. Not sure where Google stands with having multiple Ad sense accounts though, I think you can only have one connected to your own name? You could always open more from your family members and stuff but this whole topic is a bit shady and people should definitely be careful and decent if doing this...
Google told me in 2018 that you can have one Adsense Channel "per business entity". At the level he is at I'm guessing that there is more than one LLC, which would make sense.
@noahmorris8511they really should have left that in, super important to know both the good sides and the bad with real examples. Glad you were transparent about that as well :)
Could you please post it on your channel in the Community feed?😉@noahmorris8511
So knowingly breaking copywrite law but is smarmy and tries to work around it as much as possible. Not someone you should be looking up to.
As a faceless channel recently accepted into the YPP, I can confirm all this to be good stuff
Lol and theres me, trying to make a gaming channel were i actually do show my face 🤣 maybe I need a new avenue! Na! Imma persevere!!!
Nah I think its the supply and demand thing that you are struggling
@MysterryPlayer na, I don't think so, I increased my subscribers by 40 percent and viewing time by over 200 percent in the last 28 days, I don't think the market is oversaturated, you just need to always try to Improve
@@CptBuckarooit's not over saturated, it's under saturated. Nobody watches long letsplays on unpopular games nowadays
@@D4N1LO I never said it was over saturated, but I agree! Nobody watches unpopular games
Same lol
I hada situation recently where I was using some music from a game in one of my videos. The developers are very cool with people doing this on RUclips (they've literally said this), it doesn't get flagged by the Content ID system and they don't make copyright claims. But I used a certain piece of their music that did get flagged by Content ID. I was confused, and it turned out that it got flagged by another company that I guess represents independent music artists or something like that. Turns out some guy had remixed the game's music into his song, causing the Content ID to flag it as owned by him. I tried to appeal it but, of course, RUclips just told me that the guy claims it's his and, as I'm not the owner of the music either, I can't really go further and say 'well, no it's not owned by him.' Just kind of sucks that the developers let people use their music and you've got a$$holes remixing it into their songs that are then copyrighted which prevent other people from using it themselves like they did.
That's probably the scummiest thing I've read. Hope those "independent artists" get their karma served...
Exactly....I used music from Dragon Raja (a mobile game) and it got claimed by some ásshãt
Did you email the Game Developers about it all?
Also say they need to do a basic licence to stop someone doing this.
The thing is..
You are using the original not their remix.
I suppose someone could get their remix and remix it again and then copyright them...
For all of you ripping on the person who issued the claim, they paid to use that source material. They have a right to defend their use of it the same as any copyright holder.
@@mySeaPrince_ I considered it but I was concerned that they wouldn't know how to handle the situation or what they could do (the claim is on my video after all, not theirs, meaning the option to appeal is only available to me, even though it's their music) and was concerned they might think the only response is to begin actively claiming and flagging all their music themselves to ensure no one else does, resulting in the same problem but worse. I might still do it though, I'm not sure. I'll continue to look into it.
I will honestly say. Listen to anything these channels tell you with a grain of salt. They prey off of those who can’t seem to break out on RUclips. And they’ll continuously drive you away from creating what you wanted to.
I like your comment, !!! I DON'T WANT TO DRIVE AWAY OF MY CREATIVITY. !!!
Desperation and lack of honesty with our self, fear to fail, etc., etc., etc.,
Most of the time, could be, we want someone guide us to success, but then we need to think, WHY ? I can not be successful like him, ? MAY BE FEAR.
Don't fear failure, fear all the opportunity's you lose because your fear and insecurities and LET YOUR CREATIVITY SHOW YOU THAT YOU KNOW THAT EVERYTHING IS POSSIBLE, JUST DO IT,................YOU WILL SUCCED.
Must of the time we forget how powerful our BRAIN AND UNIVERS ARE AND THAT YOU CAN MANIFEST, WITH YOUR ACTIONS AND DESIRES,
!!!! WHEREVER YOU WANT. !!!!
Love how this video is a prime example of its subject.
I was just about to say this!!!!
"The impact" on the Copyright holder. It's obviously detrimental. We see non stop these thieving channels get waaay more views than the original. That's facts. And so in that case the original uploader should be entitled to a portion of revenue. I don't understand why this whole system is so complicated. There's such an easy fix to all of this. The ORIGINAL owner or uploader should always be getting some fixed portion of any works remade. whether its 1% or 5% or an amount we could eventually all agree on. I don't see how that's difficult to register with content id? But no....let's rather let thieves steal literally thousands from creators or uploaders that aren't even monetized in the first place. SMH....the whole system is broken
Transformative is part of the key. Also, if your faceless video takes away any reason to watch the original content, you're heading for a confrontation.
Hi there - great job on this video!! It is hard to get the truth sometimes - I have always felt that with any process, people try to beat the system and potentially ruin for it for other creators. You help us and it is appreciated. In my own businesses I was fair and honest.
This guy is literally trying to beat the system and trying to squirm away from copywrite laws. Another poster even said he has lost a ton of channels due to copywrite strikes.
He really creates exciting stories from those footages. He put his efforts in it. He deserves the outcome. People shouldn't be so strict like that. Thanks for sharing, Noah
Spot-on title here. The video was about avoiding copyright issues rather than teaching how to make fair use of copyrighted content
I very recently had someone download my video and upload it as their own without doing any edits to it at all.
start putting a watermark is the only thing i know could help.
@@Legacy20999 is it from tiktok?
This is the BEST video about avoiding copyright that I have watched. Excellent!!!!!
Here is my question are copyright videos treated differently then image?
Does the US legal system rules apply if the creator is not from the US?
Yes. Technically, RUclips applies the laws from around the world. But it ends up mostly being the US since that is where most content is from.
Yes because youtube is a US based company
Copyright law is unique per country, but it’s international in scope through treaties and agreements.
The original rightsholder (or their local subsidiary) could potentially sue you outside of the RUclips ecosystem under the law of the country you come from. It's unlikely, as they will probably just have the video deleted and move on, but they could sue you for copyright infringement.
Ah yes, the Dark Arts....a.k.a. theft. As a small creator who is working his butt off to get to 1000 subscribers, I can't help but think it will be much more rewarding to find success without stealing from other creators.
Nice video as always, but sorry Rob, this is not the first time I heard strange noises (mic problem), try to fix it.
Am I the only one who noticed this?)
This video does not discourage stealing from other youtube creators, and does not encourage using footage fairly, instead telling people how not to "get caught". I do not like the vibes here
Agreed. Bad vibes from VidIQ. Was considering paying for VidIQ. Your point is well taken about their true colours here given this comes across like cheerleading for copyright abusers. Good video nonetheless though. Better to know.
When you’ve had a copyright claim placed clearly by analysis on your entirely original work multiple times by huge mega holding companies long enough to observe that they actually have a market in trading copyright claims, you will be even less impressed by the moral position on theft that VidIQ has apparently decided to take here about how to sneak away with ill gotten gains in your career as another IP appropriation abuser.
The key purpose of “Fair Use” under the U.S. copyright Act of 1976 ushered right in and placed in the seat of highest honour in this video as “a legal doctrine” without the slightest challenge by VidIQ in this piece (presumably because that would tend to upset the soothing pro-theft narrative and negatively impact AVD in this video) is to identify evidence, not to provide meme cred as B-roll in any random scheme uploaded.
Big companies have done this (to me for one example) since many years ago.
Calling the recipe “faceless” doesn’t ennoble it or change the ingredients list.
And VidIQ is apparently working hard now to spread the exact knowledge of precisely how you too, kids, can become a successful internet pickpocket. Start out by choosing targets well: no big companies with legal departments! You want to stick with DEFENCELESS targets. But careful you don’t do anything wrong while you’re pickpocketing.
Just because there’s a way to get away with it doesn’t make it right.
Nice work, very informative, keep on helping us in the RUclips community.
Thank you for clearing all doubts.
How does music apply to this?
What do you mean? You have a huge RUclips Library available for everyone to download, so there you can find free copyright music for your videos ;)
If you are asking questions like this, you did not listen to a thing in this video and you need to get your ass out your head
I do very transformative and educational music analysis videos. The bulk of my content is listening to a piece of music, stopping often to reflect and breakdown what is happening composiontally and rewind to go over again. This process is repeated over and over throughout the piece. 95% of my uploads are claimed. I have made sure to stay very true to transformative and educational content my entire time on RUclips. I dispute most of the claims and lose most of the claims. The rejection notice is almost immediatly. I think in a year and a half of disuputes I have won maybe 7 total and that was primarily because they didnt respond within the 30 day window. I was REALLY hoping this video would go over the process of when you DO get claimed and how he handles disputing and IF he issues an appeal after the dispute. Thanks for the video!
Really interesting. the whole system is a bit ridiculous. It would be so much better if they can just calculate the royalty due to the content creator and send it to them instead. Like they do with radio. Any licensed broadcaster can play your song and you just get a payment. Embed the watermark system into the video editing apps so that the metatagged revenue share breakdown is uploaded along with the video, everyone can use everything and everyone gets their share. So if your video has 30 secs of someone else's song, and its the only thing playing, then they get 30 secs worth of the $$$. Just an idea but I hope something like this would happen in future.
Finally, something I always wanted to know❤
Thanks again for doing another informative interview with Noah Morris!! This guy is really amazing. He again shared important tips in this video 💪
An amazing scumbag.
vidIQ, Subscribed because your content is fantastic!
Exactly what I needed. Thank you very much :)
No offence to VidIQ but this is by far the most value I have learned about content creation and fair use then I have learned in the 15 years i've been on RUclips. THANK YOU , I had one channel hit well a few years back but was nailed with copyright I couldn't understand the fair use policy it killed my channel immediately . This was priceless yet so valuable Yeah ty to the next generation , yall helping us foggies understand. Breakin the barriers for us all LOVE THIS !
Don't you think they're playing favorites here then?
cheers buddy
So basically it's a lot easier to record your own content and download it to RUclips to avoid copyright lawsuits ❤
I want this answered! Thanks for NOT LITERALLY but stealing the words out of my keyboard 😅
Help
I Have 17.3k Watch hour but
When im trying monetize it says "We will ket you know when you're Eligible" Cause there is only 875watch hour
Would definitely contact youtube support. I have 6k watch hours and not even 600 subscribers and already have monetized channel memberships. Might be an issue with youtube u need to sort out
I can't even find his channel....
Simple
Guy stole the material
Didnt credit author
And you still watch him
meanwhile here we are
trying to create something from 0 and the yt algorithm just decided to stop showing my shorts to the audience. very nice 😂
Sorry to hear. I began making those same type of shorts as you, but took them all off my channel after a week as I figured out they were low-value and not what I wanted to represent me.
@@ThoughtfulAl ya, better to figure it out that sooner than later I guess
I know I just started like 1 week or so ago, but didn't get why all of a sudden the views went to straight 0 😅
hope your channel is doing good now
I think some people are very mistaken about what 'public domain' means when it comes to copyright. Just because it's on the internet, or even published on a site that claims it is 'copyright free' does not mean something is 'public domain, thus copyright free. To be public domain a piece of content must indeed be copyright free, and it isn't unless expressly stated as so by the creator, or owner of the copyright, and the owner of the content isn't always the owner of the copyright. This is why, as a commission artist, I originally started taking my own reference photos. I then owned the copyright on the photos, and the art.
Exactly, people cannot be bothered to actually search out the CC license (and double check to make sure that someone hasn't lifted it then put it out under CC themselves.) It's too much hard work.
People find your angle too much hard work, going and taking your own photographs. It's an angle I always admire.
When I began in Motorsport journalism I found CC images were usually too poor quality (shots of F1 races from the 70s aren't generally good for publishing!) Modern CC shots from motor races taken by fans actually broke the condition of entry if used even editorially - rendering them unusable (even if rights holder don't enforce - not worth the risk) and press release images were very limited - eventually went through the process gain accreditation to do it properly myself.
Life would be so much easier if I could just lift content......
@@touringcarmagazine Just given you a subscribe since both my son and I are rallying fans, but will watch track racing too. I used to watch F1, but stopped some time ago when Bernie sold the UK out on the live races. Used to go and watch a friend track race, so I've tried getting shots/footage of races. It's not easy!
Well according to law public domain means usually the owner Donated it for free or the copyright has expired. For books its usually till the authors death. And for music- its till 50 uears after owners death. Well for photos its 70 years after owners death. Also Copyright free photos or Videos which one usually get they are not in public domain but Technically in Creative commons license but they don't usually bother to ask
I thought about it but because i do not want copyright strikes or issues,i decided to film my videos myself and hopefully I'm doing well showing my FACE 😊
Informative. I think the best way to ethically and legally do this is to act like a reputable news network. Treat it like such by giving credit and adding value!
The only way to avoid is to strictly not use anyones videos or copyrighted stuff.
Or ask permission!
Under US law there is no “legal doctrine called fair use” as this foreign national kid lectured about US law. There is the Copyright act of 1976 which name was not changed to “the Fair Use Law” by Wikipedia despite the Wikipedia page title.
They don’t arbitrarily alter half century old legislation by the results of X Polling that say ‘theft should now be a right, but only for ME.”
Fair use is not a “legal doctrine” and even if it were a legal doctrine that doesn’t override the law, no matter who wants it to.
Fair use refers to an exception that can be allowed by a judge on a per case basis. That it is often allowed is not determinative. Any judge can refuse to consider what you’ve done to fall under the fair use exception. Like if you’re not the NYT for example, using an unauthorized screen grab in a story. Then you’re just another thief.
There is no right justified as “fair use” for anyone to steal. This “transformative” test is now what’s being determined in cases like Getty Images vs Dall-E.
Fair use has become a defence strategy. If your lawyer says “we’re going to plead ‘fair use’” that’s because he knows you will just look like a thief to the judge.
If you buy a fancy enough AI hedge trimmer (or you do it by hand) that it “transforms” the part of your neighbour’s hedge facing you to resemble Mt. Rushmore, does that mean a Judge will then move your neighbour’s property line away from you award some of your property to your neighbour?
Because that’s what all these “transformative” people are saying should happen.
‘I copy pasta’d a special prompt so that should give me some legal rights in your property.’ I don’t think so, Tim.
There’s a LOT of Silicon Valley money whining to judges about this but under law I personally don’t think it’s going to work over the long term. Because eventually a case will go to the US Supreme Court and no Supreme Court is going to say “ownership is only 1% of the law.”
You can diminutize what I’m sayings by cordoning it off as “opinion” but then your opinion is going to change when somebody like this man steals your original content from you.
Opinions can invert based on experience. Opinions can also be objectively right wrong. Calling something an opinion doesn’t magically change the moral nature of that thing from objective to subjective in nature.
Body camera footage is public domain: IE, its typically royalty free. Its really that simple, don't steal commercial work.
I am currently faceless but I'm thinking of doing facecam stuff soon honestly
Same
Amazing video! Almost no one talks about this
This is exactly whats wrong with You Tube
I'm not sure what VidIQ's intention is with this video. But it strengthens my resolve to not watch any videos on channels of this type. If they're not monetized and just sharing what is actually allowed to be shared, that's one thing. But to give counsel on how to skirt the laws and reduce your risk of getting caught, well, it just proves this guy's morals.
This is very good, and like he said, the ultimate decider is the court system.
What are the rules for using the remix option
You can turn the option off under create/clips in yt studio
@@localtravelcouplejams what I mean is: Are creators protected from copyright infringement if Remix Options are turned on.
I received a Strike from a content owner after following the Remix Option that was operational.
It was a bait & switch that cost me a Strike & 90 days of probation.
I’m suffering from a case of the “ Remix🌪️Twisties “.
It's interesting knowing this video is recommended to me after 9 month's
Awesome content! Thank you kindly to you both ❤
How can copyright law apply to peoples personal videos?? Like if they don’t want you to use it that’s different then like Disney suing you for someone’s video of their family at Disney world.
So i am getting copyright claims on videos .live performances . Some are vintage videos of a band i was . We recorded these songs in the 90s. should i dispute these ? Also there are lots of channels that uploaded songs i recorded and wrote for my band from the 70s on RUclips . I would rather them be exclusively on my channel to at least drive traffic . What to do ? So difficult to make money as a musician these days .
i share your frustration.. my other channel does cover versions in a different language, and YT says there's no added value, despite having a few videoa with tons of likes n positive comments. yet there are lyric channels being monetised, where they just copy n paste the words of a song.. 😒
How can you use clips in your videos without worrying about whether or not theyll CR you? ex. them using real life footage of people in court ( court case videos ) or whether motivational videos where they'll pull different scenes in movies/shows exc. and being able to use them...
05:31 @sniperwolf . there is no better example for that question
Does text referring to the source make any difference? A way of showing you are acknowledging the original creator and not just trying to steal content? Does it help your argument for fair use or is it just a waste of time?
I was using common creative licenced videos for one of my channels, but the content under that licence is often old and of low quality. This is useful information.
Sometimes it's really hard to find right type of content. This thing happened specially for education, explaining , science type channels. I also struggle many times to find the right video but sometimes we were not able to do.
@@tapabrataghatak7963 I used copyrighted news content today and I didn't have any problems since it was transformed.
Love your videos helping me get on the right track with my channel! Keep up the good work 💪🏼
I am sure youtube watched this video carefully and went back to the drawing board, to decide what the next step will be
So can you get copyrighted if you want to share a lil clip of a celeb in a show/movie with a piece of work you made of them? Or is it better to share a user generated content/fan clip of the celeb. with your piece of work?? And can you share a fan clip from youtube or FB too?
Can get demotize from short policy copyright?
Movies are very protected? Yet, I see channels with multiple RAW movies with millions of views.
As a designer and creative I just have a hard time getting behind this method. As always thanks vidIQ
But what about the use of Music? How does fair use or The Rules of Copyright in relation to Music work?
But RUclips has no clue what Transformative means and/or what/how Fair Use is or how it works. I upload podcasts I co-host, and most of the time it claims copyright issue as our primary host uses some intro/outro music _over which he speaks,_ transforming it from Just Music to opening/closing themes with narration.
I've not tried to monetize the channel due to these non-strike level copyright issues RUclips clearly doesn't/won't understand...
you can't just take someone's music and "transform it" by speaking over it, you absolute midwit
what about music?🤔 for instance, if i only use 90seconds of a song, speed it up and change the lyrics to something completely different from the songs lyrics?
@VidIQ Do you still get paid with personal account? Or is it only brand youtube accounts now? And what about kid channels? My kids have a channel but debating if they should switch to brand or not
I created a voiceover and edit for a small clip from an old novela, and it was still copyrighted claim because of a 2 second tune. 🤣 how do I go about creating educational videos if I can’t show examples
Years ago I had an Internet cafe in Bucharest -Romania.
Games, OS software was licensed or open sources.
One day, we had a guy for Romanian Copyright Association who come to check if we are respecting the law, and we bought OS and software.
But we put music all the time there. An online radio.
And the guy told us we have to pay for that.
It wasn't a penality. is was a contract between our company and Romanian Copyright Association - entitled to collect that money and distribute to authors.
Is was something realy cheap like 10 or 20 dollars for one year.
After that, the guy told us:
"I am a musician and I know this copyright is just a trend. Also less that 30% of that money are going back tu creators"
I will be happy to use YT music and pay for it if that money are going 90% to the creator.
Unfortunately is not like that.
top comment. The ad revenue share should be just worked out like royalties.
We know a thing or two about ©️ copyright. 🧠
Everytime I see your types of videos I wonder how the heck you get away with it 😆
@rssjultra No they aren't monetized
Would be great to interview another source like @MovieGasm to get additional info! :)
True! How about making a video about that? Would love to watch it!
I just really don't buy this. I constantly see videos with essentially no value being added, and they get away with it nonstop. It'll be literally an entire video from someone else, but then they add a meme image, and yay it's a new video? Or they'll have that stupid male AI voice that's everywhere just describe what's happening in the video, and somehow that's adding more context than the video it's describing? I still don't get how they're getting away with this, because these people are not adding more content to the video than what they've stolen and reuploaded.
That was an excellent inside. I don't care if someone took some clips of my content. After all, we are all in it to win.
Yeah Noah is awesome!! I got his course and my faceless channel is doing ok, still young but growing well .
Great video. I learned alot about this! Thanks
My channel is less than a year old and tiny. It is on Homesteading - in Australia. I film all my own footage. But sometimes I want to put out a video, that is going to say require a seasonal shot of something - lets say for instance carrots being harvested by hand, or planting a tomato. If I can find a snippet a carrot being pulled up, (less than 3-5 seconds!) can I use it if I am giving a commentary over the top of the images? I am very new to all of this and was tech phobic 12months ago, so everything about video creation is a steep learning curve....
I am a faceless youtube channel since 2006 not monetized ( no watch hours) but create my own content and edit it
Very good information! I was getting ready to do everything wrong....
Here's something I will tell from my over 10+ channels over 13 years experience here in YT which is also something I discussed with other content creators and it's not even mentioned or hinted once here, in this video or others talking about this topic.
-
No matter what "outsource content" you use, once your channel gain repercussion and certain amount of numbers starting to make you some interesting money.. you will be targeted by companies as individuals that will run a bot or manual check all your channel listing all possible "clips, memes, sounds, music" you may have used and start to massive report your videos but not to take down your channel but to take away your monetization.
-
There were cases, that even if you create your own visual meme, emote or whatever, a company or individual may take that visual and register it's copyright then copy strike all your YT videos claiming ownership over that single element and YT will not help you but give all monetization to that shady company or individual.
-
Just be aware, whatever content you do here on RUclips, if you get lucky enough to make love with the algorithm and grow your numbers into millions, you will run into this kind of problems and will be forced to hire lawyers and mentally prepare yourself for an infinite fight in this issue.
Question about narration. I narrate classic ghost stories - out of copyright - and write my own, then I add sound effects & artwork, but there are very large channels that upload narrations of in-copyright stories/books with no sound effects or original artwork. Does simply narrating something add sufficient value?
I don’t believe this is a good idea.
The channels that do this, just haven’t been caught yet.
Think about it. If I found a channel that just narrated Stephen King books, then I wouldn’t have to buy King’s books or audio books.
I’d just listen to them for free on RUclips.
The RUclipsr would basically be stealing money away from the original creator.
I miss the old RUclips, the site with real videos made my real people who actually shared knowledge. This new RUclips is an AI-generated nightmare, just thousands of lazy, talentless hacks re-posting millions of garbage videos that say nothing.
I noticed on my channel that videos created by me with Creative Commons footages don't get recommended well. Adding value through transformation is quite subjective. Another thing I noticed is if I pay licenses for songs they keep copyright claims for long before clearance. during this time they get some money probably. What happens if I delete a video with a copyright claim? I think is better to delete after clearance. What do you guys think?
interesting, so you think the algo is downrating it because the footage also appears elsewhere. Makes sense but did not know.
@@RandomButBeautiful yes. Using copyrighted footage under fair rule might result in you sharing the income produced by the video with the copyright owner as well. He lets use the footage but claims a part of the income. Everything is quite tricky. The best is you have your own footage.
I'd rather stay on the safe side... prevention is better than curing.
Great information, thank you!
IT REALLY WORKS,,,,,,,,WE DID IT
Great video ❤ Thanks for the information 🌹
I feel like my channel is being ignored by youtube, seems like couple videos are being promoted not sure what to do am so heartbroken 💔
In a nut shell, Taking someone's content is as difficult as creating your own content if not more😂
This was very informative and sophisticated discussion which I appreciate.
Thank you for sharing this information
Thank you for the information this video was so helpful! 🤠
Very Informative !!!
Very informative. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
My channel is a gaming channel, and I don't show my face in my videos, but I have recently started using my voice in videos that are not live streams. I haven't been live streaming for very long either. I started live streaming at least weekly in June this year. That is the first time I ever did a voice reveal since silent live streams wouldn't do very good right? And then I decided to start using my voice in regular videos too (at least for some of them). Before I started using my voice I'd always get background music from the Audio Library to avoid issues with copyright. When I use my voice I don't have to really worry about picking music since I want the main audio to be my voice. I do usually still have background music at a very low volume in a separate audio track than my voice is so that there's not just silence in the seconds when I am taking a breath, reached end of a sentence, etc.
Fabulous information 🌹.
Thanks Vidiq